Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) ICES WGITMO Report 2006 ICES Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment ICES CM 2006/ACME:05 Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) 16–17 March 2006 Oostende, Belgium International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H.C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2006. Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO), 16–17 March 2006, Oostende, Belgium. ICES CM 2006/ACME:05. 334 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2006 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. ICES WGITMO Report 2006 | i Contents 1 Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Opening of the meeting and introduction.................................................................................... 5 3 Terms of reference, adoption of agenda, selection of rapporteur.............................................. 5 3.1 Terms of Reference ............................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Adoption of agenda ............................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Selection of rapporteur .......................................................................................................... 5 4 Progress with terms of reference at the 2006 meeting of WGITMO......................................... 5 5 ICES alien species alert reports (ToR d) ..................................................................................... 6 5.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 7 5.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................7 6 Report for rapid response and control options (Tor e) .............................................................. 7 6.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 7 6.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................8 7 Summary of national reports 1992–2002 (TOR c)...................................................................... 8 7.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 8 7.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................8 8 Regional Ecosystem Study Group for the North Sea (REGNS) (Tor b)................................... 8 8.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 9 8.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................9 9 Information from national reports (ToR a)................................................................................. 9 9.1 Summary and highlights of 2005 National Reports (ICES member countries, countries with observer and guest status) ............................................................................ 10 9.2 New laws and regulations.................................................................................................... 14 9.3 Live imports, live exports, planned introductions and deliberate releases........................... 15 9.4 Accidental introductions...................................................................................................... 17 9.5 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 31 9.6 Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 32 10 Other Agenda Items .................................................................................................................... 32 10.1 Conference on invasive species ........................................................................................... 32 10.2 New journal on biological invasions ................................................................................... 32 10.3 New database in Norway..................................................................................................... 32 10.4 Research networks...............................................................................................................32 10.5 Discussion on ICES Code of Practice on the Introduction and Transfer of Marine Organisms ............................................................................................................... 33 10.5.1 Poliploidy................................................................................................................ 33 10.5.2 Detailed Appendices of the ICES Code of Practice................................................ 33 10.6 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 34 11 Recommendations to ICES Council........................................................................................... 34 12 Planning of next years meeting................................................................................................... 34 ii | ICES Template 13 Closing of the meeting ................................................................................................................. 34 Annex 1: List of participants at the meeting of WGITMO 2006.................................................... 35 Annex 2: Terms of Reference ............................................................................................................ 39 Annex 3: Agenda................................................................................................................................. 40 Annex 4: National Reports................................................................................................................. 42 Annex 5: PICES Working Group 21: Aquatic non-indigenous species ....................................... 119 Annex 6: WGITMO Input to REGNS ............................................................................................ 121 Annex 7: Rapid Response ................................................................................................................ 133 Annex 8: Ten-Year summary of National Reports 1992–2002 ..................................................... 143 Annex 9: Alien Species Alert: on Undaria pinnatifida (wakame or Japanese kelp)................... 292 Annex 10: Recommendations to the Council ................................................................................... 329 ICES WGITMO Report 2006 | 1 1 Summary In 2006 the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms met in Oostende, Belgium with Stephan Gollasch (Germany) as Chair. The meeting venue was the Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Oostende, Belgium with Francis Kerckhof (Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Oostende, Belgium) as host. Representatives from Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, and the United States of America contributed to the discussions. National Reports were received from 14 countries. Progress with Terms of reference ToR a) National Reports: Highlights and Use of Reports. National Reports were submitted by the following countries: Belgium, Canada, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, United Kingdom, and United States of America. Additional information was made available from Ireland and Spain. Status: completed for 2005, ongoing. WGITMO Members discussed the use of the National Reports and their potential audience. National Reports continue to be used for: • Documentation of the spread of intentionally imported and/or invasive species over time and to new geographic areas. This may be a unique data set especially when considering the long time series. • Determination which species are to be evaluated for an Alien Species Alert Reports. • Answering information requests for organizations (e.g., REGNS-ToR b of 2006 WGITMO meeting) • Providing a warning system for ICES member countries that invasives species have been found in neighbouring jurisdictions, or countries having similar habitat conditions and enabling follow up of the spread of previously introduced species, especially for secondary spread across political borders. • Giving indications which intentionally introduced species (e.g. for aquaculture use) have the potential to become invasive (e.g., Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas) and to provide a follow-up to track their spread. • Documenting exports and imports. Often such records are sketchy, but can be improved through records from other jurisdictions.
Recommended publications
  • Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes
    Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes VICTOR G. SPRINGER m SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 367 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoo/ogy Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Author's Personal Copy
    Author's personal copy 554 Book reviews Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology – The Legacy of Charles The 30 chapters are well written, and David Richardson Elton. D.M. Richardson (ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford did an excellent job in editing the diverse contributions of 51 (2011). 432 pp., £45 (paperback), £95 (hardcover), authors, most of them from North America, South Africa, and ISBN: 978-1-4443-3586-6 (paperback), 978-1-4443-3585- Australia. Asia and South America are not represented by any 9 (hardcover) contribution, and European researchers are underrepresented. Most chapters are relatively short, with an easily accessible This book is intended for all scientists and students inter- essay style. This comes at the expense of presentation of ested in biological invasions. It is based on a conference held original data, mirrored by rather few tables and figures. On in South Africa in 2008 to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the other hand, we applaud the possibility to download illus- the famous volume by Charles S. Elton on ‘The Ecology of trations from a companion website. The book is technically Invasions by Animals and Plants’. When a scientific disci- well done; virtually no typos could be spotted, and the over- pline starts exploring its history, defines terms and reviews lap among individual chapters is minimal. The terminology, achievements, this can be a sign of maturity, yet invasion for example on ‘alien’ and ‘non-indigenous’ species (chap- ecology continues to develop in a positive and dynamic way. ters 1 and 4), is not fully consistent, but this should not be The research dynamics in this field are enormous, building on taken too seriously.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Participation in the American Federal System"
    For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing ORice, Washington, D.C.20402 Preface iii In its 1976 legislation reenacting the General views are included as an appendix to this report, Revenue Sharing program for a second three-year along with a staff summary and evaluation of all period, Congress requested ACIR to prepare the comments received. The comment period several studies of fiscal decisionmaking in the extended from early December 1978 through mid- American federal system of government. Citizen March 1979. Many comments were received, participation, the topic of one of those studies, is some of considerable length and detail, and they the subject of this report. were helpful in revising our report. The number The draft report was prepared by the staff of recommendation options presented to the under its regular procedures which provide for Commission was doubled, and numerous critiques by the governmental research com- refinements in the background chapters were munity and others having special knowledge of made as a result of this consultation process. All the topic. Because of the nature of this topic, the comments received by the first of March were Commission also held a hearing on the draft fully reflected in information presented to the report at its regular meeting on December 7,1978. Commission prior to its action on this report. Following this hearing, the Commission deter- The Commission adopted the recommen- mined that opportunities should be provided for dations in this report and authorized its printing a broader range of views to be submitted on Friday, March 23, 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Ornamental Fish Commonly Cultured in Florida 1 Jeffrey E
    Circular 54 Freshwater Ornamental Fish Commonly Cultured in Florida 1 Jeffrey E. Hill and Roy P.E. Yanong2 Introduction Unlike many traditional agriculture industries in Florida which may raise one or only a few different species, tropical Freshwater tropical ornamental fish culture is the largest fish farmers collectively culture hundreds of different component of aquaculture in the State of Florida and ac- species and varieties of fishes from numerous families and counts for approximately 95% of all ornamentals produced several geographic regions. There is much variation within in the US. There are about 200 Florida producers who and among fish groups with regard to acceptable water collectively raise over 800 varieties of freshwater fishes. In quality parameters, feeding and nutrition, and mode of 2003 alone, farm-gate value of Florida-raised tropical fish reproduction. Some farms specialize in one or a few fish was about US$47.2 million. Given the additional economic groups, while other farms produce a wide spectrum of effects of tropical fish trade such as support industries, aquatic livestock. wholesalers, retail pet stores, and aquarium product manufacturing, the importance to Florida is tremendous. Fish can be grouped in a number of different ways. One major division in the industry which has practical signifi- Florida’s tropical ornamental aquaculture industry is cance is that between egg-laying species and live-bearing concentrated in Hillsborough, Polk, and Miami-Dade species. The culture practices for each division are different, counties with additional farms throughout the southern requiring specialized knowledge and equipment to succeed. half of the state. Historic factors, warm climate, the proxim- ity to airports and other infrastructural considerations This publication briefly reviews the more common groups (ready access to aquaculture equipment, supplies, feed, etc.) of freshwater tropical ornamental fishes cultured in Florida are the major reasons for this distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Odia: Dhudhiya Magara / Sorrah Magara / Haladia Magara
    FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka 2018 ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute Barrackpore, Kolkata - 700 120 (India) & Chilika Development Authority C- 11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751 014 (India) FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta, M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das, A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka Photo editing: Sujit Choudhury and Manavendra Roy ISBN: 978-81-938914-0-7 Citation: Suresh, et al. 2018. Fish and shellfish diversity and its sustainable management in Chilika lake, ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, Bhubaneswar. 376p. Copyright: © 2018. ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (CIFRI), Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holders. Photo credits: Sujit Choudhury, Manavendra Roy, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, V. R. Suresh, S. K. Karna, M. Mukherjee and Abdul Rasid Published by: Chief Executive Chilika Development Authority C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751 014 (Odisha) Cover design by: S. K. Mohanty Designed and printed by: S J Technotrade Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Temperature Tolerances of Tropical Fish with Potential Transgenic Applications In
    Canadian Journal of Zoology Low -temperature tolerances of tropical fish with potential transgenic applications in relation to winter water temperatures in Canada Journal: Canadian Journal of Zoology Manuscript ID cjz-2017-0043.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 13-Jul-2017 Complete List of Authors: Leggatt, Rosalind; Department of Fisheries and Oceans, CAER Dhillion, Rashpal;Draft University of British Columbia, Zoology; University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin Institute for Discovery - Epigenetics Mimeault, Caroline; Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Aquaculture, Biotechnology and Aquatic Animal Health Branch Johnson, Neville; Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Aquaculture, Biotechnology and Aquatic Animal Health Branch Richards, Jeffrey; University of British Columbia, Department of Zoology Devlin, Robert; Fisheries and Oceans Canada, ANIMAL IMPACT < Discipline, COLD HARDINESS < Discipline, GENETIC Keyword: ENGINEERING < Discipline, TEMPERATURE < Discipline, FRESHWATER < Habitat, TEMPERATE < Habitat, FISH < Taxon https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Page 1 of 35 Canadian Journal of Zoology 1 1 Low-temperature tolerances of tropical fish with potential transgenic applications in 2 relation to winter water temperatures in Canada 3 R.A. Leggatt, R.S. Dhillon, C. Mimeault, N. Johnson, J.G. Richards, R.H. Devlin 4 5 Corresponding author: R.A. Leggatt: Centre for Aquaculture and the Environment, Centre for 6 Biotechnology and Regulatory Research, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 4160 Marine 7 Drive, West Vancouver, BC, V7V 1N6, Canada, Email: [email protected], 8 Tel: +1-604-666-7909, Fax: +1-604-666-3474 9 R.S. Dhillon 1: Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 4200-6270 University 10 Blvd. Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada, [email protected] 11 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Fish Now That You Have Set up Your Aquarium and Are Starting to Think About Adding Fish, You Have Many Choices to Choose From
    Tropical Fish Now that you have set up your aquarium and are starting to think about adding fish, you have many choices to choose from. One specific type of fish is the tropical fish, found in tropical waters all over the world and in areas near the equator. They can live in fresh water such as ponds, lakes, streams and even oceans that are salt water. In home aquariums, tropical fish are usually kept in heated fish tanks or in areas where the ambient room temperature is between 70°F - 82°F. As you make your decisions, be sure to research their compatibility, hardiness and if they are a schooling fish or not. Selecting the right fish will help ensure that you have hours of enjoyment and success. Today, many freshwater fish are captive bred either in fish farms or by hobbyists, making them readily available and easy to find. Popular freshwater tropical fish include Bettas, Guppies, Tetras, Swordtails, Platys, Barbs, Mollies and Corydoras among others. Sometimes people starting out in the aquatic hobby may not always provide their fish with ideal living conditions. Fish recommended for beginners and new aquariums must be durable and able to handle sometimes-poor water quality and stressful living conditions. The list included here are freshwater fish and will provide you with a nice assortment to consider. Cold -Water Fish The most common cold-water fish species is the goldfish but there are many other fish species that do not require a heated tank such as White Cloud Mountain Minnows, Bloodfin Tetras, and Rosy Barbs among others; where their preferred water temperature is between 64 to 72 degrees F.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Changes in the Names of New Zealand Tree and Shrub Species
    -- -- - Recent changes in the names of New Zealand tree and shrub species - Since the publication of 'Flora of New Zealand' Volume 1 (A- iii) Podocarpus dacydioides Dacrycarpus ducydioides lan 1961),covering indigenous ferns, conifers and dicots, there (iii)Podocarpus ferrugzneus Prumnopitys ferruginea have been major advances in taxonomic research and the clas- Podocarpus spicatus Prumnopitys taxijolia sification of many plant groups revised accordingly. Most of (iv1 Dacrydium cupressinum (unchanged) these changes have been summarised in the Nomina Nova (v)Dacrydium bidwillii Halocarpus bidwillii series published in the New Zealand Journal of Botany (Edgar Dacrydium bijorme Halocarpus bijormis 1971, Edgar and Connor 1978, 1983) and are included in re- Dacrydium kirkii Halocarpus kirkii cent books on New Zealand plants ie.g. Eagle 1982, Wilson (vi)Dacydium colensoi Lagarostrobos colensoi 1982). A number of these name changes affect important (vii)Dacrydium intermediurn Lepidothamnus intermedius forest plants and as several of these new names are now start- Dacrydium laxijolium Lepidotbamnus laxijolius ing to appear in the scientific literature, a list of changes af- (viii)Phyllocladus trichomanoidi~(unchanged) fecting tree and shrub taxa are given here. As a large number Phyllocladus glaucus (unchanged) of the readers of New Zealand Forestry are likely to use Poole Phyllocladus alpinus Phyllocladus aspleniijolius and Adams' "Trees and Shrubs of New Zealand" as their var. alpinus* * main reference for New Zealand forest plants, all the name changes are related to the fourth impression of this book. * It has been suggested that the Colenso name P, cunnin- it is important to realise that not all botanists necessarily ghamii (1884)should take precedence over the later (18891 ark agree with one particular name and you are not obliged to use name (P.
    [Show full text]
  • Iep Newsletter
    n Interagency Ecological Program for the San Francisco Estuary n IEP NEWSLETTER VOLUME 30, NUMBER 1, 2017 OF INTEREST TO MANAGERS .......................................................................................................................... 2 HIGHLIGHTS .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 All Hands on Deck: Revamping the Discrete Water Quality Blueprints of the IEP’s Environmental Monitoring Program .......................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of DWR Old-Middle River Turbidity Transects ........................................................................................ 5 STATUS AND TRENDS .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Zooplankton Monitoring 2013–2015 ......................................................................................................................... 9 CONTRIBUTED PAPERS .................................................................................................................................... 21 Evaluation of Adding Index Stations in Calculating the 20-mm Survey Delta Smelt Abundance Index ................ 21 Evaluating Potential Impact of Fish Removal at the Salvage Facility as part of the Delta Smelt Resiliency Strategy ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Predation Impact of the Introduced Ctenophore Mnemiopsis Leidyi in the Gullmars Fjord, West Coast of Sweden
    POPULATION DYNAMICS AND PREDATION IMPACT OF THE INTRODUCED CTENOPHORE MNEMIOPSIS LEIDYI IN THE GULLMARS FJORD, WEST COAST OF SWEDEN Lene Friis Møller & Peter Tiselius Dep. Of Marine Ecology – Kristineberg University of Gothenburg The Gullmar Fjord Always stratified Well-documented Rich and diverse fauna Kristineberg Also many jellies Cnidarians Aurelia aurita Cyanea capillata Many hydromedusae Ctenophores Pleurobrachia pileus Bolinopsis infundibulum Beroe cucumis Beroe gracilis What is dominating has now changed.... Mnemiopsis leidyi - invasive ctenophore Native species along the Eats zooplankton American East Coast (and fish eggs) Invaded northern Europe in 2005/2006 High reproduction Most famous for its invasion into the Black Sea in the 80´s Given the rapid growth and high reproductive output of the Mnemiopsis, severe effects on its prey populations may be expected It is impossible to predict the outcome of the introduction into Swedish waters based on observations from other areas – both potential prey and predators differ It is therefore necessary to investigate the development and impact of Mnemiopsis locally Mnemiopsis studies in the Gullmar Fjord In the current project we study the development of the Mnemiopsis population in the Gullmar fjord by regular sampling from March 2007 to present (for long periods every week) (+ zooplankton, chl a, primary production, CTD) x Biomass (g wet weight m-3) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 0 17‐Jun‐07 6‐Aug‐07 25‐Sep‐07 2009 2008 2007 14‐Nov‐07 3‐Jan‐08 22‐Feb‐08 Mnemiopsis biomass 12‐Apr‐08 2007-2009 1‐Jun‐08 21‐Jul‐08 9‐Sep‐08 29‐Oct‐08 18‐Dec‐08 6‐Feb‐09 28‐Mar‐09 17‐May‐09 6‐Jul‐09 25‐Aug‐09 14‐Oct‐09 3‐Dec‐09 22‐Jan‐10 Development Oral/aboral Rapoza et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The AQUATIC DESIGN CENTRE
    The AQUATIC DESIGN CENTRE ltd 26 Zennor Road Trade Park, Balham, SW12 0PS Ph: 020 7580 6764 [email protected] PLEASE CALL TO CHECK AVAILABILITY ON DAY Complete Freshwater Livestock (2019) Livebearers Common Name In Stock Y/N Limia melanogaster Y Poecilia latipinna Dalmatian Molly Y Poecilia latipinna Silver Lyre Tail Molly Y Poecilia reticulata Male Guppy Asst Colours Y Poecilia reticulata Red Cap, Cobra, Elephant Ear Guppy Y Poecilia reticulata Female Guppy Y Poecilia sphenops Molly: Black, Canary, Silver, Marble. y Poecilia velifera Sailfin Molly Y Poecilia wingei Endler's Guppy Y Xiphophorus hellerii Swordtail: Pineapple,Red, Green, Black, Lyre Y Xiphophorus hellerii Kohaku Swordtail, Koi, HiFin Xiphophorus maculatus Platy: wagtail,blue,red, sunset, variatus Y Tetras Common Name Aphyocarax paraguayemsis White Tip Tetra Aphyocharax anisitsi Bloodfin Tetra Y Arnoldichthys spilopterus Red Eye Tetra Y Axelrodia riesei Ruby Tetra Bathyaethiops greeni Red Back Congo Tetra Y Boehlkea fredcochui Blue King Tetra Copella meinkeni Spotted Splashing Tetra Crenuchus spilurus Sailfin Characin y Gymnocorymbus ternetzi Black Widow Tetra Y Hasemania nana Silver Tipped Tetra y Hemigrammus erythrozonus Glowlight Tetra y Hemigrammus ocelifer Beacon Tetra y Hemigrammus pulcher Pretty Tetra y Hemigrammus rhodostomus Diamond Back Rummy Nose y Hemigrammus rhodostomus Rummy nose Tetra y Hemigrammus rubrostriatus Hemigrammus vorderwimkieri Platinum Tetra y Hyphessobrycon amandae Ember Tetra y Hyphessobrycon amapaensis Amapa Tetra Y Hyphessobrycon bentosi
    [Show full text]
  • 72 NATIVE PLANTS in a FENDALTON GARDEN Usually
    72 NATIVE PLANTS IN A FENDALTON GARDEN DEREK COOK AND WARWICK HARRIS Usually private gardens come and go with little record of their existence. Often their duration is short and determined by the period of care the gardener who created them is able to give to them. Through creating and caring for a garden, a gardener inevitably acquires knowledge of the plants in the garden and their requirements for adequate growth. While most gardeners are happy to show and talk to people about their gardens, few leave a written record of the knowledge they acquired about the plants they grew or attempted to grow in their garden. This is a record of plants of the garden of Derek Cook created at 27 Glandovey Road, Fendalton Christchurch. As described by Mary Lovell-Smith (2001) in The Press, it is a garden that was developed as a consequence of a passionate interest in native plants. The garden is a plant collector's garden. Consequently its form is determined by the objective to grow as many different species of native plant as possible, rather than a concern for decorative appearance. Through this approach information has been obtained about which native plants are most likely to succeed in a Christchurch garden. The first list (Table 1) prepared by Derek Cook recorded plants present in the garden in August 2000 that had survived "Christchurch frosts and dry nor'westers for 5-10 years." A list made in September 2001 recording acquisitions made since the list of August 2000 is given at the end of Table 1.
    [Show full text]