Promoting Management and Leadership Canon DR: Nothing compares in Medical Imaging Volume 8 Issue 2 / 2008 April - June Canon DR: Easy as child’s play ISSN = 1377-7629 Unrivalled portability, ultra easy operation, optimal image quality, immediate results ...... the benefits of Canon DR anywhere are unlimited. Maximum efficiency is achieved through a minimum x-ray dose. Only Canon, the inventor of portable Digital Radiography, can offer six years of experience and expertise in the market. See for yourself: Nothing compares. Radiology • Cardiology • Intervention • surgery • it • Management • Europe • Economy • Trends • Technology

Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services

Open Source PACS Maximising Workstation The A - Z of Cost- Decreases Costs Productivity Effectiveness Analysis See it in action now at the ECR 2008 Booth number 105/EXPO A www.canon-europe.com/medical [email protected] Issue 1 Out Now!

Cardiology Management is the only hard-copy journal focusing on best practice in management in cardiology departments across the world. Distributed four times per year, this journal is tailored to meet your informa- tion needs on the latest best practices in management topics, such as staff, financial and IT-related manage- ment issues.

Issue 1, now available, includes the following articles:

Cover Story – Guidelines and their Implementation • Are ESC Syncope Guidelines Being Implemented in Europe? • Heart Failure Guidelines • Overcoming Guideline Implementation Challenges in Europe

Features • Evaluating Heart Disease: The Role of Cardiac Imaging

Technology Management • IHE Cardiology Technical Committee: Achieve Systems Integration • Report on Remote Monitoring for Cardiology • Market Overview of Cardiology PACS Devices • Mechanical Circulatory Support: New Generation Devices Mark a New Era

Call for Abstracts! Call for Abstracts! Call for Abstracts! Call for Abstracts! Call for Abstracts! Call fo

Please submit all management-related abstracts to Managing Editor Dervla Gleeson at [email protected]. A full list of desired topics is available from our website. Visit us at www.cardiologymanagement.eu EDITORIAL

Dear readers, able to move patients around the hospital, who are receiving resuscitation for multi-organ injury. Delivering a first-class imaging service to emer- gency departments is a major challenge for many The solution has been to place dedicated CT and radiology departments around the world. Tradi- in some cases MR machines within emergency de- Prof. Iain McCall tionally most radiologists are not resident in the partments, but these require constant servicing by Editor-in-Chief hospital and specialists have a large inpatient and radiologists. This isolates the equipment from the [email protected] outpatient workload during the day, which often main department, which in itself poses further lo- precludes providing immediate service to emer- gistical problems, reduces staff flexibility and may gency patients and anything other than an on-call increase the inefficient use of expensive assets. after-hours service. All these issues have resulted in a re-evaluation The European working time directive has also had of the way emergency services are provided. At a a major impact on the availability of radiologists macro level there has been closure of smaller de- to provide a 24/7 dedicated service to emergen- partments and the creation of regional major trau- cy departments. In addition, the massive rise in ma units that can be serviced by all the key clinical the use of ultrasound, multi-slice CT and even services. This has enabled radiology to reorganise MR as immediate diagnostic investigations for a the way the imaging is provided with dedicated multitude of injuries, abdominal pain and stroke staff specialising in emergency work providing ap- have resulted in an explosion of complex studies propriate shift coverage, and the advent of PACS requiring experienced radiologists to interpret. and teleradiology has enabled some of the contin- Traditionally in those hospitals where training of uous urgent reporting to be performed off-site. radiologists takes place, much of the provision of radiological support to emergency departments Ultimately it would be better to have experienced was provided by the trainees with varying degrees radiologists in major emergency departments 24/7 of back-up support by their specialist tutors. who would work as and be recognised as a funda- mental part of the emergency team. Such models are While this model still persists it is increasingly functioning around the world although the lack of untenable as the diagnostic skills required have in- sufficient radiology staff and training posts in many creased and the time juniors have for this work is countries is acting as a barrier to further progress. reduced. It is also unacceptable that juniors’ train- ing in the whole field of radiology should be jeopar- This issue of the journal gives insight into the dised by the need to cover the emergency services. way that major emergency radiology services can be provided in an efficient, clinically- and cost- The high use of CT and ultrasound in the emer- effective manner, and I hope that it provides some gency department has also had a major impact on ideas for those grappling with this previously in- the provision of equipment as it is no longer pos- tractable problem. sible to fit urgent multi-trauma cases requiring vir- tually whole body CT studies into routine CT lists within most departments. Equally it is unaccept- Prof. Iain McCall

HAVE YOUR SAY! Letters to the Editor at [email protected]

1

content Healthcare Economics IMAGING Management Volume 8 Issue 2, April - June 2008 20 Principle Components of Conducting and Reporting a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: What Every Decision-Maker Needs to Know Dr. S. Ondategui-Parra Features 22 Open Source PACS: Does it Really Decrease Costs of Healthcare IT? Prof. D. Caramella, Ing. Elisa Talini 24 The Digital Age in Medical Imaging: Dr. T. Vogl, Dr. M.G. Mack, Dr. T. Lehnert 26 Sharing Medical Data Across Organisations and Systems Dr. H. Pohjonen Country Focus: Austria 36 Overview, Austrian Health and Hospital System: Towards Managerial and Financial Convergence 39 Management Challenges for Medical Imaging in Austria: The Chairman’s Perspective Cover Story Prof. W. Jaschke 40 Profile of the Austrian Society of Radiological Technologists: Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services Interview with Society President, Dr M. Rosenblattl 12 The Changing Board Exam Schedule in the US: General Radiologists to be Re-homed in the ER Department? 41 Radiology Management in Austria: Dr. S. Baker Profile of the AKH Imaging Department Prof. Dr. A. Staudenherz 14 Restructuring Emergency Radiology Services: Increasing Efficiency and Decreasing Staff Turnover Dr. T. Langli 1 Editorial 18 Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services: By Editor-in-Chief Prof. Iain McCall Collaborative Approach Gets Results 4 Association News Dr. J.O. Johnson Latest updates from leading European associations 8 EU News - CORDIS Launches FP7 Health Research Web Service Editor-in-Chief Correspondents - European Parliament Approves Postponement Prof. Iain McCall (UK) Prof. Frank Boudghene () of Controversial MRI Directive Prof. Davide Caramella () Editorial Board Nicole Denjoy (France) 10 Industry News Prof. Hans Blickman (The Netherlands) Prof. Adam Mester (Hungary) Prof. Georg Bongartz (Switzerland) Dr. Sergei Nazarenko (Estonia) Coverage of corporate news and updates Prof. Michel Claudon (France) Dr. Hanna Pohjonen (Finland) Prof. Albert Cuocolo (Italy) 30 Product Comparison Chart Prof. Nevra Elmas (Turkey) Guest Contributors Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems Prof. Guy Frija (France) Dr. S. Baker Prof. Marc Kandelman (France) Prof. D. Caramella 44 Imaging Leaders Prof. Lars Lonn (Sweden) Prof. W. Jaschke Prof. Heinz U. Lemke () Dr. J.O. Johnson Interview with Dr. M. Rosselli Del Turco, President, Prof. Jarl A. Jakobsen (Norway) Dr. E. Krupinski European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA) Prof. Mieczyslaw Pasowicz (Poland) Dr. T. Langli, Prof. Udo Sechtem (Germany) Dr. T. Lehnert 45 How To… Increase Workstation Productivity Prof. Rainer Seibel (Germany) Dr. M.G. Mack Dr. Nicola H. Strickland (UK) Dr. S. Ondategui-Parra Advice from Dr. E. Krupinski Prof. Henrik S. Thomsen (Denmark) Dr M. Rosenblattl Prof. Vlastimil Valek (Czech Republic) Dr. M. Rosselli Del Turco 48 Conference Agenda Prof. Berthold Wein (Germany) Prof. Dr. A. Staudenherz Upcoming seminars in Europe and beyond Ing. E. Talini Dr. T. Vogl

3 Association News

MIR Announces Call for Abstracts

Management in Radiology (MIR) has an- Mrs. Amanda Jelley at the following email ad- Congress registration information is available nounced that the deadline for abstract sub- dress: [email protected]. on the MIR website at www.mir-online.org. mission for its forthcoming annual scien- tific congress, to be held in Athens, Greece A preliminary list of programme topics for Registration Fees: from October 29 – 31, 2008, will be Friday, this annual imaging management congress Early Registration - until October 1, 2008: July 18, 2008. will soon be available online. • ESR Member Early Fee: 325 euros • ESR Non-Member Early Fee: 425 euros Submissions should be no longer than 350 The congress will be held in Athens, Greece, words and delivered by sending an email in at the following location: Late Registration - from October 2, 2008: Microsoft® Word format - including purpose/ Hotel Astir Palace, Apollonos 40 Str., • ESR Member Late Fee: 425 euros methods and materials/results/conclusions to 16671 Vouliagmeni, Athens/GR • ESR Non-Member Late Fee: 550 euros

Topics Announced for 2008 Congress

The annual CARS, ISCAS, EuroPACS, CMI, • Computer Assisted Cardiovascular Imaging Submissions Welcome and CAD four-day congress 2008, to take • Image Processing and Display Abstracts or papers including new methods, place in Barcelona, Spain from June 25 – 28, • Medical Workstations devices and applications, clinical studies, posi- 2008, consists of invited talks by internation- • Interventional Radiology tion papers, and poster topics for presentation ally recognised experts, over 200 paper pre- • Minimally Invasive Spinal Therapy at the congress are welcomed. Submissions sentations, as well as exhibits and posters. • Image Guided Diagnosis and Therapy will be peer-reviewed by members of the in- Special focus sessions as well as product ex- of the Prostate ternational programme committee. Abstracts hibits in the industrial exhibition are planned, • Ablation Therapies of accepted lecture and poster presentations to give participants access to hot topics and • Image Guided Radiation Therapy will be published in the proceedings, a supple- new CARS-related products. • Nanotechnology for Imaging and Therapy ment of the International Journal of CARS, • Telemedicine, e-Health and Multimedia EPR which will be distributed to all congress par- Congress Topics • Expert Systems and Computer Assisted ticipants. Paper contributions will be included 22nd International Congress and Exhibi- Education in regular issues of the international journal of tion on Computer Assisted Radiology • Economic and Management Issues CARS. Authors should send their submissions • Medical Imaging, e.g. CT, MR, US, SPECT, • Security, Legal and Ethical Aspects through the CARS website, see further infor- PET, DR, Molecular Imaging, and Virtual mation and guidelines at http://www.cars-int. Endoscopy org/Authors/cars_2008call_for_papers.htm.

ECRI Institute Provides Guidance to Broadlane CT Buy

ECRI Institute will serve as an unbiased ex- “By combining ECRI Institute’s state-of-the-art • The state of the marketplace: pert, offering equipment purchasing clients technology and marketplace insight with Broad- What technologies are available now and the inside track on the latest medical equip- lane’s rigorous Live Group Buy process, attend- where are they heading? ment at Broadlane’s upcoming Computed To- ees should achieve double-digit savings and con- • Key clinical issues: What issues are most mography (CT) Live Group Buy. fidence they are making wise product choices important when considering a purchase? based on the best information available.” • Recent technological advances: “Roughly 41 percent of hospitals will be pur- How do these advances impact chasing a CT this year,” said Kerry Tucker, Vice- ECRI Institute will provide event participants performance and value? President, supply chain services, Broadlane. insight into:

4

Association News

Dates Announced for CIRSE 2008, Copenhagen, Denmark

The CIRSE congresses have become Eu- tional radiologists. This year CIRSE will again abdominal stent grafts and aortic dissection. rope’s most comprehensive interventional devote an important part of its programme They will allow interacting with world-re- meetings focusing on raising the profile of to vascular intervention, including a “Foun- nowned experts on technically and clinically cardiovascular and interventional radiology, dation Course, the essentials on technical challenging cases. and attracting public awareness and politi- and clinical management of peripheral vas- cal attention. cular disease”. The course will be followed Imaging plays a pivotal role in our daily by a self assessment test all attendees are practice, in terms of guiding, patient eligi- Next year’s edition is scheduled to take place invited to take. bility, intervention and follow-up. Attendees from September 13 - 17, 2008, in Copenha- will get updated in new imaging modalities, gen, Denmark. CIRSE 2008 is a unique forum The special sessions at CIRSE 2008 will range including cardiac imaging, 3D road mapping, where medical professionals can meet their from aortic and visceral aneurysms to TIPS, flat panel CT, fusion imaging and whole colleagues from all around the world, and stroke management, carotid artery stenting, body 3T MRA in various special sessions. exchange ideas and information in the field diabetic foot, dialysis shunts and much more. of minimally invasive, image guided therapies. Controversy sessions in which experts will One special session will focus on key imag- The best recent scientific developments and debate topics such as below-the-knee stent- ing features which should lead to the pro- novel research will be presented. ing, IVC filters and thrombolysis for DVT will posal of the corresponding intervention for help attendees to form their own opinion on the patient. Another new feature will be a Vascular Interventions these constantly evolving fields. “Peripheral MRA and CTA: tips for better Vascular interventions represent a major imaging” workshop. component of the work of many interven- Two interactive case discussions will focus on

Next Connectathon Announcement

The next European IHE Connectathon is IHE provides a detailed implementation and During the Connectathon, systems exchange to take place in Oxford, UK from Monday 7 testing process to promote the adoption of information with complementary systems April to Friday 11 April 2008 and will be held standards-based interoperability by vendors from multiple vendors, performing all of the at Saint Catherine’s College. and users of healthcare information systems. transactions required for the roles they have The process culminates in the Connectathon, selected, called IHE Actors, in support of de- IHE is an initiative by healthcare professionals and a weeklong interoperability-testing event. The fined clinical use cases, called IHE Integration industry to improve the way computer systems Connectathon provides the most detailed Profiles. Thousands of vendor-to-vendor con- in healthcare share information. IHE promotes validation of the participants’ integration nections have been tested overall, and tens of the coordinated use of established standards work. Participating companies prepare for thousands of transactions passed among the such as DICOM and HL7 to address specific the event using testing software—the MESA systems tested. clinical needs in support of optimal patient care. test tools—developed for this purpose.

EuroPACS Annual Congress: Topics Announced

EuroPACS is Europe’s most intensive PACS This year’s annual edition to take place in Bar- • PACS Evaluation and Economical Aspects congress, covering all the important subjects celona, Spain from June 25 – 28, 2008, will in- • PACS Beyond Radiology that are useful not just for healthcare IT per- clude between 400 – 600 delegates from dif- • Image Distribution, Storage sonnel, but for all those concerned with ef- ferent countries. The conference programme and Archiving Strategies ficient workflow management and the latest will offer information on the latest and most • Workflow and Data Flow in Radiology IT developments involving radiology. Sessions significant developments in clinical practice, • Regional PACS and Teleradiology will be chaired by expert topic leaders includ- research and education within digital radiol- • Cross-Border Experiences ing Dr Jarmo Reponen, Prof. Davide Caramel- ogy, including: • Security and Privacy, Quality Assurance, la and Prof. Berthold Wein. • PACS Planning and Purchasing Strategies Legal Aspects

6

EU News

CORDIS Launches FP7 Health Research Web Service CORDIS, the European Community cipients, including healthcare profession- stitutes 15% of the overall budget of the Research and Development Service, als, practitioners and patients is the third. Health programme. Intellectual prop- has launched a new health research web erty has been given more protection. service for the Seventh Framework Pro- The ‘Get Support’ link provides a list gramme (FP7) to provide information of National Contact Points (NCPs) for For other information, the ‘Library’ on health research, a part of the FP7 obtaining further information. Users page lists all relevant documents on Cooperation programme. will also find support for research ap- Health Research under FP7 and the plicants, proposal negotiation, project ‘Useful Links’ page outlines all areas On this website, an ‘About Health’ page management and small and medium- relating to Health within FP7. These gives comprehensive details of the three sized enterprises (SMEs). A page on the include current health research in FP7 pillars of health research focus. Empha- site will be dedicated to ‘International as well as details of ‘Life sciences, ge- sis on biotechnology and ensuring that Cooperation’, which explains the strat- nomics and biotechnology for health’, research is specifically geared towards the egies involved in the realisation of this the FP7 theme’s forerunner from FP6. improvement of human health are the theme throughout FP7. first two themes. Maximising the delivery http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/health/ of the outcomes of research to relevant re- FP7 has increased funding, which con- home_en.html

European Parliament Approves Postponement of Controversial MRI Directive

The European Parliament has recently of MRI in healthcare in Europe, while of the EU Physical Agents Directive approved the request by the European welcoming this recent development, 2004/40/EC (EMF) is necessary to Commission to postpone the Directive remains concerned that a number of ensure the future unimpeded use of on the use of MRI for a period of four member states have proceeded with MRI, particularly for research and years in order to have sufficient time to transposition of the Directive. It has MR-guided interventions. The safety review the EU Physical Agents Directive called on the European Commission to of MRI workers is already regulated 2004/40/EC (EMF). address this situation. by the EU Medical Devices Directive (amend. Direct 93/42/EEC) and the The European Parliament approved The current published Directive pre- established MR safety standard IEC/ the postponement with a clear ma- vents healthcare staff from assisting or EN 60601-2-33 (as amended to in- jority. The Directive will be delayed caring for patients during MR imaging. clude users and workers). The IEC by four years until April 30, 2012, to As a result, some patients who cannot standard establishes limit values for allow time for a substantive amend- be imaged without this care – if they time-varying electromagnetic fields ment to be adopted. Prior to this, the are young, elderly, frail or confused – which have been set so that any danger European Commission will be under- would either be denied imaging or have to patients and workers is excluded. taking a comprehensive impact as- to undergo alternative procedures such sessment of the Directive and a broad as x-rays. http://allianceformri.org stakeholder consultation. Derogation Necessary to Ensure The Alliance for MRI, an initiative Future of MRI Dervla Gleeson launched with the aim of addressing The Alliance for MRI has stated that Managing Editor, IMAGING Management the impact of the directive on the use a derogation for MRI from the scope [email protected]

8 © 2007 Philips Electronics North America Corporation.

Simplicity is an exceptional image and a patient at ease. Philips Achieva 3.0T X-series MR scanner. Now optimal scan quality and patient comfort go hand in hand. The Achieva 3.0T provides a remarkably large field-of-view and enhanced imaging technology to handle your most advanced applications. And the open flare, compact design is more relaxing for your patients. Keeping everyone’s needs in mind just makes sense.

www.medical.philips.com/achieva

Exceptional image patient at ease_Achieva3.0TX_210x276.indd 1 28-02-2008 15:32:05 Industry News Philips Closes Visicu Acquisition Boston Scientific said it will seek to overturn the verdict in Philips Holding has completed a 427 million dollar acquisition post-trial motions before the district court. If unsuccessful, the of Baltimore-based Visicu, a healthcare IT and clinical solutions company said it will appeal to the US court of Appeals for the company focused on critical care. The terms of the deal include Federal Circuit. payment to option holders, pursuant to the previously an- nounced merger agreement by and among Visicu, Philips and Ice Saffran, a radiologist who obtained a patent for a drug-delivery Merger Sub. With the close of the acquisition, shares of Visicu device in 1997, is not asking to stop sales of the product, but does common stock are no longer listed on the Nasdaq exchange. have a similar case pending against Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) sub- sidiary Cordis, according to his lawyer Eric Albritton. Philips said it intends to capitalise on its extensive sales channel network to accelerate Visicu’s adoption by ICUs at hospitals in the The suit against J&J involves its Cypher stent on Raptor over- United States, while internationalising Visicu’s activities and migrat- the-wire delivery system and Cypher stent on Raptorrail rapid ing its technologies into other departments within hospitals. exchange delivery system.

Judge ups Boston Scientific Infringement Payment McKesson to Incorporate Proventys Risk Prediction Capa- US District Judge T. John Ward has added 69.4 million dollars in in- bilities terest to the 431.9 million dollars a jury ordered Boston Scientific McKesson will incorporate Proventys’ risk prediction capabili- to pay after a jury found that Boston Scientific’s Taxus Express and ties into the McKesson core clinical decision support solutions, Taxus Liberte drug-eluting stent products infringe Saffran’s patent as part of a newly formed strategic relationship. Proventys and that the patent is valid. Attorney for the plaintiff, Bruce Saf- translates predictive data from traditional and emerging diag- fran, MD, of New Jersey, said this type of interest is “not routinely nostic tests into clinical decision support solutions. This clinical granted” and is at the discretion of the presiding judge. The inter- decision support tool aims to provide information to physicians est dates back to when Boston Scientific first infringed on the in the process of making patient care decisions. patent in question. Toshiba Partners with MedicSight Medicsight has entered a preliminary agreement with Toshiba Medical System’s System Integration division for the resale of its MedicRead Colon and ColonCAD software solutions through- out Japan. Under the terms of the agreement, Toshiba will work with Medicsight to obtain MHLW approval in Japan, according to both companies.

“This agreement is timely as the recently announced positive outcomes of two major clinical trials are widely expected to accelerate the adoption of CTC (also known as virtual colonos- copy) as routine primary screening for colorectal cancer,” said David Sumner, CEO, Medicsight.

Fuji Purchases Pharma Company Japanese photography giant Fujifilm Holdings has reached an agree- ment to acquire pharmaceutical firm Toyama Chemical. Fuji, the parent of Fujifilm Medical Systems, plans to acquire a majority stake in Toyama to enable Toyama to develop its existing pharmaceutical pipeline, and will allow Fuji to enter the pharmaceuticals market.

Toyama is working on drugs such as an anti-influenza virus com- pound and an agent for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Under terms of the agreement, Toyama will become a subsidiary of Fuji.

Fuji said the deal is an example of the company’s new focus on healthcare as it implements “large-scale structural reforms” to its traditional photography business. The company plans to expand from its base in diagnostic imaging and is increasing its investment in R&D and mergers and acquisitions.

10 FAX BACK TO +32 2 286 8508

Administrator/Manager: Administrator o Radiology o Radiology Business Manager Administrator o PACS Executive Officer / IT Manager o Chief Information /o Chairman / Managing Director Director Executive o Chief Financial Officer / titles other executive Other o Medical Physicist Academic o Radiographer / Senior Technologist o Chief o Manufacturer o Business Consultant o Distributor / Dealer o Private clinic beds) of o Hospital (check number than 500 beds o More o 400-499 beds o 300-399 beds o Diagnostic X-ray o Nuclear Imaging o Interventional Radiology o CT o Ultrasound o MRI o Mammography o Bone Densitometry o PACS/Teleradiology Imaging o Cardiac o PET o Echography Angio/Fluoroscopy o Non-physician professionals professionals Non-physician below) (respond one) occupation? (check only What is your 1c. to reply All respondents the questions below work? In what type of facility do you 2. one) (check only With what technologies or disciplines 3. (check all that apply) work? do you

Vascular & Interventional Vascular Overseas 105 euros o Overseas 180 euros o Overseas o General Radiology o Neuroradiology o Nuclear Medicine o Nuclear Radiology Diseases o Cardiovascular o Paediatric Radiology o Other (please specify) 1b. What is your radiology is your sub-specialty?What 1b. one) (check only o

www.imagingmanagement.org 85 euros o Europe 150 euros o Europe

o No Yes o o Diagnostic Radiologist (please specify) o Other Physician rue de la Loi - B-1040 Brussels - Belgium;

1a. I am Chief of my Department I am Chief of my 1a. Medical Doctors (respond below) Medical Doctors (respond one) occupation? (check only What is your 1. Reg.nr.: Subscription Rates (5 Issues / Year) Subscription Rates (5 Issues / One year years Two subscription free your ESR Registration Number for Or enter your and fax it to +32 2 286 8508. this form • Complete How to Subscribe? How to [email protected]; an email with name and address • Send and post it to this form • Complete 28, Email: Telephone: Postcode: Country: Address: Address: City: Institution: Job Title: Title: Job Surname: First Name: First Name: Title: Title: Subscription Form ing Management for Imag In order to qualify please fill in the questions below: In order Cover Story: Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services

The Changing easy to interpret. Our once-exclusive proprietorship of the intellectual manipulation of the 2D to 3D transfor- Board Exam mation has been challenged. Schedule in the US Such a sea-change threatens to engulf the claims of expertise formerly and until recently held by general General Radiologists to be radiologists. Because of the vast and accumulating ex- Re-homed in the ER Department? panse of newly available information engendered by technical advances, they can now no longer lay claim to the possession of recondite knowledge and know- Change, though a constant in radiology, does not al- how. Other specialists who care for patients directly ways announce its arrival. Though the introduction can now have at their disposal, detailed static depic- of a new modality, for example, is readily manifest, in tions of disease as well as video clips and exciting func- contradistinction, some profound changes are the result tional data. Hence, by dint of accessibility to this new of gradual alterations of attitude or slowly developing diagnostic armamentarium, more and more reliance realignments of opportunities or subliminal redirection will be placed on those radiologists who are specialised of perspectives held by regulators, policy planners, or in the referrer’s discipline. competitors. Such subtle developments are generally Author perceptible by those attuned to look for such trends, The neurosurgeon will still benefit from the insights Dr. Stephen R. Baker though most radiologists may be caught unawares. of the neuroradiologist and the thoracic surgeon will New Jersey Medical School continue to seek advice from the chest radiologist. But New York, US [email protected] Just such a metamorphosis will soon occur in the US. the general radiologist increasingly will have less and Today, advances in imaging are leaving those who pro- less to offer to their traditional referrers. After all, our fess only general capabilities in radiology in the un- clinical colleagues’ residency education and practice comfortable position of not being that essential after are suffused now with sophisticated image instruction. all. Anatomy and gross pathology can now be observed Many have gained technical facility with image-guid- readily in 3D arrays, revealed in multiplanar reforma- ed procedures. From now on the radiologist must be a tions rendering composite images which are relatively specialist to other specialists or face obsolescence.

12 Cover Story: Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services

Of course, this job category will not disappear over- Just as technology has driven radiology towards subspe- night. In small and outlying facilities, the general ra- cialisation as an imperative, so too will clinical demand diologist will stay vital but in a gradually reducing drive radiologists towards round-the-clock and often role, servicing primary physicians and other caregiv- on-site coverage. Where is the predominant locus of ers who have had relatively little training in imaging after-hours practice? The emergency suite of course. Tel- interpretation. Yet in hospitals of at least medium eradiology may suffice for ER coverage in small hospi- size, larger radiology groups must become more dif- tals. However, for larger, busier institutions the in-house ferentiated along subspecialty lines if they want to radiologist will be a necessity if diagnostic imaging is to keep their “turf”. remain within our specialty and not be apportioned to ER physicians and trauma surgeons. Such an individual US Radiology Education Faces Overhaul will have to demonstrate advanced knowledge of general Radiology education must adapt to this actuality. US ra- modalities adapted to all emergently ill and trauma pa- diologists can no longer be reassured that their four years tients, because by definition, emergency radiology cannot of residency education, which is now the longest interval be confined to one technology or one organ system or one between internship and fellowship of any non-surgical body region or one patient age group but to one spectrum specialty, should continue to exist as is. Recent calls to of conditions defined by urgency of presentation. change the timing, content and context of the written and oral boards are motivated by a desire to redirect resi- Emergency Radiologists the “Odd Man Out”? dency education to emphasise subspecialty options. Over the years, emergency radiologists in the US have been in many ways the odd man out. They do not have And these calls have been heard! Despite objections from a separate component of the oral board exam through those reluctant to change, the American Board of Radiol- which knowledge and skill are tested even though there ogy has taken the step of fundamentally reorienting resi- is a curriculum entailing emergency radiology’s distinc- dency training. The traditional oral board exam with the tive corpus of knowledge. candidate and reviewer in close communication will be replaced by computer-directed tests. Moreover, the exam Currently, only a few emergency radiology fellowships ex- schedule will be altered. The present written exam taken ist. In various departmental schema, emergency radiology in the fourth year will be replaced by an image-rich, com- has been an afterthought, despite the fact that in some hos- prehensive, qualifying test occurring sometime after 30 pitals up to 50% or even more imaging studies take place months of residency and the aforementioned oral exam in the emergency suite. With the expected transformation will be supplanted by a certifying exam focusing predomi- of radiology education towards encouragement of specialty nantly on areas the candidate wishes to pursue in practice. training, it is time now for emergency radiology to claim This latter exam will take place two to three months after that it too can provide a meaningful experience for those the completion of the fellowship year. who wish not to be bound by a focus on a modality or part of the body and yet claim special expertise. Guidance The effect of the institution of those changes will stimulate and instruction must be provided to enable newly minted subspecialty training which will likely commence after the radiologists to be regarded as the successors to general ra- initial exam, allowing for much of the last period of resi- diologist, specialists dedicated to serving the emergently ill dency to focus on the intensive development of expertise and injured and the highly trained physicians and surgeons in one or two realms of subspecialty knowledge in prepa- who care for them. ration for the continuance of focused training in a fellow- ship to follow in the fifth year of radiology training. Conclusion To me, the path ahead is clear. Emergency radiology is General Radiologist to be Re-homed a distinct discipline as evidenced by the creation of a fo- in the ER Department? cused curriculum, and a willingness of its practitioners to But what about the person who does not want to specia- be available at any time. Emergency radiologists are con- lise? What would the fifth year entail and what are the versant with new imaging techniques and are comfortable opportunities for practice? Regrettably but inevitably, with maintaining a continuing dialogue with emergency the tasks assigned to the generalist of today will likely physicians and trauma surgeons. If emergency radiologists diminish as radiology groups become larger and more and general radiologists fail to recognise these inevitable specialty organised. But the effective “generalist” of to- changes they may face obsolescence, and fall victim to the morrow will have a role to play if his focus is on the vagaries of technology which, fundamentally, does not urgent and emergently ill and injured. owe the practitioners of radiology anything. ❉

13 Cover Story: Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services Restructuring Emergency Radiology Services Increasing Efficiency and Decreasing Staff Turnover

Ullevål University Hospital (UUH) is one of the largest hospitals in Scandinavia with about 9,000 employees. The hospital functions on four differ- ent levels. As well as acting as the local hospital for the largest part of the Oslo region, it is one of five Author regional hospitals in Norway, a National Centre of Dr. Turid Langli Competence in some fields and the trauma cen- Head of Department tre for the whole part of southern Norway and the Department of Radiology Ullevål University Hospital south-west part of Sweden. (UUH) Ullevål, Norway [email protected] The trauma function, which serves approximately half Identifying the Problems the population of Norway, has been recognised as the most important part in our internal Strategic Plan for Logistics and domestic considerations the period 2007 – 2010. From January - August 2007, The department is geographically situated between the a total of 13,000 patients were admitted to the emer- surgical and medical wards. This is very convenient gency unit, of which 700 caused chaos for the multi- for the in-house patients, but less effective concerning disciplinary trauma team. the trauma patients entering the hospital. As part of a strategy to separate the patient flow of the emergency When the hospital was reorganised recently, the prima- patients and those with a planned admission, it was ry concern was to focus on patient flow in order to opti- decided to build an intermediate ward of 50 beds for mise both treatment and the use of medical resources. all emergency patients close to the admission area. The maximum stay in this ward is 48 hours. During this Radiological Services at the UUH time it has to be decided whether to transfer the patient Our radiological service is organised in four radiological to another in-house department, to another hospital, to departments as well as the department of nuclear medi- a nursing home or back home. cine. The radiological departments are the departments of neuro-, cardiac and peripheral vessel intervention, To meet the needs of the emergency department and and paediatric radiology, relatively small units with of course the needs for accurate diagnosis immediately between 15 - 40 employees. The central radiological after admission of critically-ill patients, radiology has department numbers approximately 180 people. This established a satellite unit in the admission area. This department also contains a radiological unit for emer- entity is equipped with MSCT, angiography, DR and gency out-patients in downtown Oslo in addition to a ultrasound suites. Other examples of decentralisation breast diagnostic centre and a unit of diagnostic medical is an MSCT scanner in the oncology department and physics serving most other hospitals in the region. In a mobile DR unit for bedside use serving the nursing 2007, the radiological departments performed around homes in the Oslo region with online transfer of the 371,000 diagnostic and interventional procedures be- examinations to UUH for immediate diagnosis. tween them. Working environment The central radiological department is responsible for Working in a radiological department with a high the primary radiological diagnosis on a round-the-clock number of emergency examinations of critically- basis, and of the 25,000 emergency examinations car- ill patients, combined with in-house and outpa- ried out in 2007, 22,000 were done by this department. tients expecting to be examined at fixed hours are Each radiological department has a consultant radiolo- very demanding for the personnel. In the past, ma- gist on call at home 24-hours a day equipped with a jor concerns included a high turnover of radiolo- PC linked to the hospital RIS/PACS system to decrease gists, radiographers and other employees and a sick diagnostic time and reduce the need for the radiologists leave percentage of approximately 16. In addition, on-call to go to the hospital. the building that housed the department was built

14

Cover Story: Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services

quite a number of years ago, in an era when a lot of of know-how accumulated in this new organisation the radiological exams had to be performed in dim has helped, the theory being that acknowledging and lighting. Thus there was hardly any daylight in the increasing this adds to self esteem and better job-satis- premises; a factor we now know has great impor- faction. Consequently, the organisation was expanded tance for fatigue. to further develop trade and increase research.

What are the Improvements? Great emphases are put on the collaboration of all The most important change was the separation of different occupations in the department. Radiolo- emergency and planned examinations with separate gists, radiographers and physicists work together in core teams for each group. In addition, a focus on optimising examinations. This multi-occupational making our personnel confident of the huge amount work forms the base for arranging national courses targeting all these profes- sions. Also, the department has lecturing contracts with both the University of Oslo and Oslo College of Radiography, enabling in- creased participation in in- ternational congresses and stays in hospitals abroad to exchange experiences. In addition, more scien- tific papers are produced and accepted in interna- tional publications and in- vestments in ergonomical workstations surrounded with green plants and light- intensive PACS screens al- lowing for illumination with daylight tubing have helped.

Employees a Core Focus Management have also fo- cused on encouraging em- ployees as well as giving them the time and means to undertake new challeng- es both in their daily work and to venture into re- search and teaching. Praise is essential, as is taking part in their career planning, listening to their sugges- tions for organising the work schedule and show- ing consideration for their wellbeing both on and off work. Examples of this are the distribution of free

16 Cover Story: Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services

fruit and making a physiotherapist at the disposal of raphy suite for diagnostic and interventional purpose employees two days a week. will be installed shortly. Finally there is a suite with a 64-row CT scanner which can be accessed from the In this period, the percentage of sick leave has dropped trauma suite through a sliding door. In addition the from 16 to five. With a total of 180 employees, this trauma suite contains a mobile ultrasound unit and means 18 more people present each day. This has a a suspended x-ray tube for conventional radiography great effect on the working environment as well as with free positioning, enabling it to serve three trauma allowing time for essential activities like research and patients in different locations in the room. An addi- studying. Staff turnover has decreased dramatically, tional mobile radiography unit can be used all through and the department is now able to serve the hospital the emergency area. with high-quality radiology. 24h/day radiologist and radiographer service Radiographic Services Now Provided During the day the emergency radiology section con- in the New Admission Area sists of two staff radiologists and one resident in train- ing, two radiographers and one secretary. All cases are Workflow model for emergency examinations. immediately interpreted by one of the in-house resi- All requests for radiology are either received online or dents and read out by staff personnel. In case of special scanned into the RIS. One of the key factors for effec- CT and MRI image interpretation, sub-specialists from tive imaging services is a three grade alerting system in other radiological departments are alerted online via a our RIS. These grades are marked with different icons, red-dot system in the RIS, and they are able to make and for the most acute grade the icon stays with the ex- all necessary post-processing and other diagnostic work amination throughout all stages ensuring first priority on their own workstation without having to rush to the until the final report is signed. emergency unit.

State-of-the-art equipment After 4pm, two residents and a general staff radiolo- All emergency patients receive immediate radiology gist from the central radiological unit are on duty until service in the admission area. The emergency radiol- 11pm, whereas for the rest of the night two radiology ogy unit consists of four rooms staffed with radiolo- residents remain in the hospital. But there are radiolo- gists and radiographers. There is a general radiography gists on call in general, cardiovascular, neuro- and pae- room with state-of-the-art computer, radiography diatric radiology both for diagnostic and interventional equipment, an ultrasound room and a modern angiog- purposes round-the-clock. ❉

17 Cover Story: Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services

Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services Collaborative Approach Gets Results

Author According to the Centre for Disease Control, over able to help the radiologist trouble-shoot any Dr. Jamlik-Omari 115 million patients per year visit emergency de- number of problems, be they administrative, Johnson partments in the United States. At our institution, technical or image-related. This division of Radiologist Department of Radiology approximately 48% of the admissions originate in labour allows the radiologist to concentrate Massachusetts General the emergency department. However, emergency on interpreting images and providing con- Hospital departments are not just where the critically ill sultations rather than being distracted by ad- Harvard Medical School Boston, US present for acute intervention. The number of pa- ministrative, scheduling and clerical issues. [email protected] tients seeking primary and even preventative care in the emergency department has ballooned as the Facilitating communication between the number of under- or uninsured people has increased. various members of the emergency radiol- ogy team can be a challenge under normal circumstances. When the pace is quickened Emergency medicine relies heavily on medical imaging for tri- and resources are stretched, open channels of communica- age, treatment and disposition. The percentage of emergency tion are essential to prevent patients from falling between department patients that are imaged approaches 50%. Many the cracks. In our department, we have designed and imple- of these patients are imaged multiple times. At our institution, mented a real-time, web-based electronic protocolling and we average 1.15 examinations per emergency department visit. tracking system that allows all members of the radiology By conservative measures over 57 million emergency radiology team (staff, residents, technologists, clerks and administra- studies are performed each year; more liberal estimates place the tors) to monitor and manage workflow within emergency number of emergency radiology examinations at 105 million. radiology. Such tools orchestrate the movement of patients in and out of emergency radiology quickly and safely. At our institution the number of emergency medicine visits has increased by approximately 5% per year over the past Automated and streamlined workflow fosters more efficient few years. However, emergency radiology imaging services and improved quality of care. Streamlined internal work- are growing by 7 - 8% per annum. This disparity is not only a flow and improved patient throughput leads to quicker reflection of the demand for urgent care but is also a function disposition, and higher referring physician satisfaction and of emergency radiology’s essential role in helping physicians ultimately lead to better patient outcomes. Healthcare sav- to properly triage patients. ings are also realised when effective triage of emergent diag- nostic studies can be tailored to the patient in consultation Across the country, busy emergency departments treat pa- with the ordering physician based on demographics, clini- tients 24 hours a day/7days a week/365 days a year. The cal history, relevant data and physical examination. importance of an integrated, fully functioning, streamlined emergency radiology service is imperative and should ad- Reducing Medical Errors dress a number of key areas. Medical errors cost the healthcare system billions of dol- lars every year. Although radiology accounts for a fraction Quality Management and Workflow Efficiency of this number, and while emergency radiology is an even Preparedness is a major component of effectively respond- smaller fraction of this number, there is always room for ing to any emergency. It is difficult to predict when and improvement. Obviously, we can reduce our errors by effec- to what extent tragedy will tax the resources of the radiol- tively communicating the correct diagnosis the first time. ogy department. However, creating an elastic system that There are, however, other aspects of the quality control ru- can expand and contract with the volume of cases, allows bric that are less well thought of, that should be considered, emergency radiology to better serve patients. A dedicated especially in light of the recent attention to imaging over- emergency radiology manager is helpful in this regard. utilisation and radiation exposure. How do we insure the proper examination is ordered in the appropriate setting? The radiology manager can coordinate the various tech- nologists and clerical staff to optimise their efficiency. He The utility of the various imaging modalities is well-doc- or she can also interface with referring physicians to resolve umented in both the acute and non-acute setting. Based many of the non-medical issues. The manager is also avail- on this experience, we have designed internal authorisation

18 Cover Story: Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services

and protocolling procedures for higher order examinations, The approach to emergency radiology requires collabora- such as CT and MRI, which have decreased the number of tion with emergency medicine, medicine, surgical and criti- unnecessary, inappropriate and incorrect examinations. cal care colleagues. Imaging plays a major role in the triaging and the disposition of patients in the emergency depart- Prior to the patient’s departure from emergency radiology, ment. Radiology staff should be proactive team members examinations are checked to ensure no additional images or rather than passive consultants. Active participation among sequences are needed. In highly critical cases that are often en- radiologists facilitates more efficient patient care. countered in level 1 trauma settings, staff or residents are avail- able to give near real-time preliminary readings at the scanner. Several staffing models exist, however, emergency radiology Effective triage of imaging modalities, timely provision of ap- needs to support the emergency department and, in many propriate examinations and expedited interpretations are para- settings, the remainder of the hospital during off-peak hours. mount to positive outcomes. Designing imaging algorithms Staffing 24/7 allows for contemporaneous interpretations that and protocols specifically tailored to answer the clinical ques- have an impact on patient care. This reduces the potential for tions posed in the ED saves time, saves money and saves lives. patient recall for further evaluation and delayed diagnosis.

Staff Management Conclusion As with any specialty, having a dedicated group of highly Problems inherent to emergency medicine populations are trained radiologists with emergency radiology as their pri- well documented. One of the largest challenges is to deter- mary focus confers an advantage. Exposure, experience and mine which patients need higher order level of care ‑ hos- expertise in this medium not only aid in the appreciation of pitalisation or intensive clinical intervention versus those subtle or atypical findings that can significantly impact pa- that can be managed conservatively or even followed up in tient outcome in a positive manner, but also allows for im- an out patient setting. Medical imaging plays a significant proved efficiency. Emergency radiology is more than simply role in the decision. The role of emergency radiology is not interpreting images. It also entails image planning, resource only to acquire images and to render interpretations, but triaging and clinical consultation in a fast-paced setting the goal is to do so in an efficient and safe manner that aids where the resources are limited and the stakes are high. the referring physician and protects the patient. ❉ Flexible mobile imaging solutions

How many boxes can you tick? I’m upgrading my existing CT and/or MRI. I’m installing a new CT and/or MRI. I’m replacing my existing Cardiac Cath Lab, CT and/or MRI. I need to reduce a waiting list. I have building work or a turnkey project at the hospital that will leave us without scanning services for a number of months. I would like to evaluate the PET/CT technology before purchasing. talk to us If you have ticked at least one box, give us I have an ad-hoc project and I will need a PET, CT and/or MRI for a limited period. a call, we can help you. Tel: +44 (0)1926 482 018 www.allianceinterim.com An interim mobile imaging www.alliancemedical.eu.com Your chance to visit a mobile MRI unit at unit could be the solution! the ECR 2008: Extension Expo A, Stand 4. 9 Immediate access to a choice of mobile imaging systems. 9 A fl exible and tailored mobile service. 9 An all-inclusive competitive price.

AMIS00 IM 210 xx138.indd 1 17-01-2008 15:31:00 Healthcare Economics Principle Components of Conducting and Reporting a Cost- Effectiveness Analysis

Author Dr. Silvia Ondategui- Parra The fundamental principle of economic anal- the economic burden of a disease. This type of analysis, Associate Hospital Director ysis is that choices have to be made between also referred to as “cost-minimisation analysis,” asks the Teknon Medical Center alternative uses of resources, as there is a question, “What is the cost?”. An implied assumption Barcelona, Spain finite pool of resources with which to provide is that the health outcomes of different preventive, di- also, Adjunct Assistant all medical care possible to each individual. agnostic or therapeutic strategies are considered equiva- Professor This principle is not debated. By provid- lent. E.g., an analysis that assumes the effectiveness Boston University School ing estimates of outcomes and costs, these of abdominal hysterectomy and laparoscopic-assisted of Medicine Boston, US analyses illustrate the tradeoffs involved in vaginal hysterectomy are equivalent, and that women’s sondateguiparra@ choosing among a variety of clinical interven- preferences for each are equivalent, might simply report partners.org tions to provide the best healthcare. Never the costs associated with each. Although these types of before has it been more apparent than in our analyses may identify the least costly way of obtaining current healthcare environment that these an appropriate outcome, they cannot specifically predict tradeoffs are inevitable. what the relationship of cost to health outcome will be.

The application of economics to clinical practice in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) healthcare does not necessarily mean that less money Cost-effectiveness analysis incorporates information should be spent, but rather that the use of resources about both costs and health outcomes to describe the might be more efficient. Broadly speaking, the tools value of a particular healthcare programme. CEA evalu- of clinical economics can be applied to the analysis of ates an intervention through the use of a cost-effec- medical practice to improve decisions on how to allo- tiveness ratio. In the ratio, all health outcomes (com- cate resources for clinical interventions. pared with a clearly stated alternative intervention) are included in the denominator, and all costs or changes Here, we will define each type of economic evaluation, in resource use (compared to a clearly stated alternative highlight the basic similarities and differences, and intervention) are included in the numerator. then focus on the principle components of conduct- ing and reporting a cost-effectiveness analysis, one of This type of analysis can be used to compare more the most commonly used economic evaluations used intensive forms of an intervention with less intensive in clinical medicine. forms (e.g., screening every year vs. every three years for cervical cancer); a new technology with the standard of Cost-Identification care (e.g., laparoscopy vs. laparotomy); prevention of a or Cost-Minimisation Analysis problem versus treating it (e.g., behavioural school inter- Cost-identification analysis is used to describe and ventions to reduce rates of sexually transmitted diseases quantify the cost of a particular type of medical care or in teens vs. a school-based clinic to provide early treat-

20 Healthcare Economics ment of these infections). These types of analyses define lars per year of life saved or per quality-adjusted life year the “opportunity cost” of each choice, and provide im- saved) as a result of a given clinical intervention when portant data to decision-makers in diverse settings for compared to the next best alternative. In this ratio, two making informed decisions about interventions. alternatives are being compared with the difference in their costs being divided by the difference in their effectiveness. The particular type of cost-effectiveness analysis that Cost-effectiveness ratios should be reported as dollar per uses Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) as the mea- unit of effectiveness stating the year of the costs, for ex- sure of outcome is sometimes referred to as a cost-utility ample, 25,000 dollars per life year saved (1998 dollars). analysis (CUA), although may alternatively be referred to as one type of cost-effectiveness analysis. Cost-utility Cost-effectiveness analyses are always incremental with analysis is a methodological approach to assessing the the ratios comparing each intervention to the next most value of a given health technology programme, or inter- effective alternative. This means that the costs and clini- vention. As such, it can be considered a process innova- cal benefits associated with the intervention of interest tion designed to inform decisions about utilisation and should be compared to existing practice and to all other coverage of medical interventions. reasonable options. When all possible alternatives are not included, there is a risk of coming to an incorrect conclu- Cost-Benefit Analysis sion that an intervention is cost-effective, but only be- Cost-benefit analysis differs from CEA in that it values cause it was compared with a cost-ineffective alternative. both health outcomes and costs of medical interventions in dollars. Because clinical benefit is measured in terms Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and of currency, a net benefit or net cost can be calculated by Resource Allocation subtracting the cost from the benefit. The criteria that A systematic consideration of cost-effectiveness in de- cost-benefit analysis relies on is whether the benefits of cisions concerning the implementation of healthcare a preventive, diagnostic or therapeutic programme out- technologies would contribute to the efficiency of the weigh the costs, the premise being that if clinical pro- healthcare system. This goes further than the initial grammes that fulfil those criteria are adopted, decisions decision to finance a new healthcare technology based will be made that will result in an “optimal” solution on a favourable cost-effectiveness ratio. A systematic within the economic welfare framework. approach should raise and solve questions of broader resource allocation. The opportunity costs involved The most common methods of assigning dollar value with implementing a new technology should not be to health outcomes are willingness to pay and human restricted to the ‘old’ substituted technology but to all capital. Willingness to pay, a monetary measurement resources available to the healthcare funder. obtained by estimating an individuals willingness to pay for life-saving or health-improving interventions, An imaging test with highest diagnostic accuracy is not can be assessed by a survey that relies on an approach necessarily the test of choice in clinical practice. The called “contingent valuation”, or it can be indirectly in- decision to order a diagnostic imaging test needs to be ferred from decisions that have actually been made that justified by its impact on downstream health outcomes. involve tradeoffs between health and money. Human Decision analysis is a powerful tool for evaluating a di- capital values health in terms of the productive value of agnostic imaging test on the basis of long-term patient individuals in the economy. outcomes when only intermediate outcomes such as test sensitivity and specificity are known. The basic princi- Despite these difficult measurement issues (i.e., the ples of decision analysis and “expected value” decision- assignment of a dollar value to outcomes like mortal- making for diagnostic testing are introduced. ity, functional status and quality of life), cost benefit analyses do appear in the clinical literature. Because it The appearance of more CEAs in the radiology litera- requires valuing all outcomes in monetary terms, it al- ture in the future will create new insights into the reasons lows for comparison to other sectors of society where for the high cost of medical care and uncover ways to benefits are not clinical health outcomes (i.e., environ- decrease unnecessary expenditures. Readers of this lit- ment, education, and defence spending). erature must become familiar with the basic vocabulary, rationale, and standard methods of CEA. By improving Cost-Effectiveness Ratio our knowledge and understanding of this state-of-the- Cost-effectiveness ratio is the measure used to express the art research tool, the radiology community will have a results of a cost-effectiveness analysis andrepresents the in- greater ability to participate in healthcare policy setting cremental price of obtaining a unit health effect (i.e., dol- and decision-making locally and nationally. ❉

21 FEATURE

Open Source PACS Does it Really Decrease Costs of Healthcare IT?

Authors Ing. Elisa Talini During the last two years the radiology depart- Due to its central role in a paperless envi- Prof. Davide Caramella ment at the University Hospital in Pisa, Italy, has ronment, the PACS system is one of the (above) introduced PACS technology, implementing an open most critical and cost-demanding infor- Diagnostic and Interventional source PACS. Pisa University Hospital is the second mative system modules in the healthcare Radiology Department University of Pisa largest hospital in Tuscany after Florence University scenario. Therefore, providing a hospital Pisa, Italy Hospital, with 1,519 beds and 77,725 admissions for with an IT infrastructure for medical im- [email protected] inpatients in 2006. The IT team working at the Divi- ages is a big issue: it needs time and re- [email protected] sion of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology has sources, starting from the project design, been involved in many projects in the field of IT ap- to server and client installations, the in- plications in radiology, developing new IT solutions troduction of the system into radiologi- for radiology. Particular efforts have been devoted cal workflow and the management of the to the implementation of a prototype PACS system, running system. In our PACS adoption based on an open source solution that also offers project, we started by analysing the ra- teleradiology and e-learning features. diological requirements to evolve toward a paperless environment and we evalu- In 2003 the hospital was provided with a commercial ated different solutions available on the market. RIS (RA2000, Siemens, ASP model). At that time there was no plan for introducing a PACS system, so the IT We found the possibility to use an open source software group moved toward possible low-cost integrated solu- very interesting. According to a new report by the Cali- tions. The O3-DPACS solution, provided with a research fornia HealthCare Foundation, open source software agreement with the University of Trieste, has enabled two will decrease the cost of health IT and help physicians radiology departments in Pisa to have a digital archive share information. for radiological images that allows radiologists to report exams, checking images on diagnostic monitors. What are the Advantages of Open Source? The term open source does not actually mean ‘free’, but The purpose of adopting an open source PACS has been pertains to the possibility to modify the code permits to improve radiological workflow, and to evaluate the personalisation made by the IT in-hospital group. Hav- benefits and drawbacks of open source software, with ing access to the source code and to any change in it, in-house radiology information system management. would grant the adopter greater control of the system We present the proposed model and report the results and more possibilities to survive failures in this support. obtained during a real-world validation. Another advantage of open source software could be in interfacing PACS with other systems, for instance RIS, Currently, hospitals and institutions all over the world EPR or HIS: licencing the software to interface systems are upgrading their systems to reach a completely film- represents the biggest upfront costs. and paperless environment. Radiological modalities have been converted into digital imaging producers fol- Introducing O3-DPACS to Pisa lowing DICOM standards, and PACS is becoming an In 2005 Pisa University Hospital signed a research agree- essential requirement across the hospital environment. ment with the Bioengineering and ICT group of the Since images are not printed any more, every physician University of Trieste. They provided O3-DPACS open in the hospital must be able to access the PACS database source software, as well as support to the in-hospital IT and visualise patients’ studies on monitors. team for the implementation in the Pisa environment.

22 O3-DPACS was implemented to provide PACS func- The first production step involved the S.Chiara ra- tionalities to two radiology departments (S.Chiara and diology department. All the DICOM modalities be- Cisanello) located in buildings about 4km from each longing to different vendors (CT, MR, CR and DX) other. Through this project, digital images and associat- were connected to the archive server and several clients ed patient data can be transferred electronically among (testing different DICOM software) were configured medical staff over a 100 Mbps connection network, to query-retrieve images from the PACS server. Some through a dedicated fibreoptic channel, and become integration issues were solved, sometimes with modal- available throughout the departments. ity-provider support.

The IT group started in 2005 by testing the O3-DPACS The second step followed the involvement of the software in a laboratory, connecting just one modality, Cisanello radiology department. To improve the DI- a CT, and one client workstation. In this way, with the COM server performance, another ordinary PC was remote support of the software developers, the IT group used to store images from Cisanello modalities. In this became familiar with the O3-DPACS configuration way the workload was divided between the two PC pro- and features. After some weeks of laboratory testing, cessors, but the clients of both departments were con- the analysis of the departmental image productivities figured to access images on both archives. guided our choice of the best low-cost hardware. All the modalities are now configured to automatically Installing PACS in the Real Setting send exams to the archive servers, so that they are imme- The solution was to realise the archive server with an diately available for reporting. Radiologists from any cli- ordinary PC, using an AMD Athlon XP 3000+, 2 GB ent in both departments are able to access the images and RAM and a 2 TB NAS storage. The RAID hard disk share all relevant current and prior clinical information configuration provided a security level against hardware pertaining to any patients. This PACS-guided workflow, failure. Security breaches are handled through encryp- characterised by rapid retrieval and presentation of a tion and firewalls. continued on p. 43

Come and see us at DRK [89. Deutscher Röntgenkongress]! 30 April - 3 May 2008 | Berlin Booth F 38

Healthy viewing. Gesund betrachtet.

PLANILUX® & ELTRONO®. Your partners in analog and digital viewing.

+ Proven and patented Tilt function »Ergo-Tilt™«: ELTRONO®’s improved and state-of-the-art reduces the risk of muscu loskeletal stress in ergo-dynamic functions can: neck, shoulder and arms. + Increase your concentration + Patented adaptive light: ensures the luminance + Increase your diagnostic efficiency and accuracy contrast to reduce eyestrain and fatigue. + Improve your digital work environment Trademark. ® + Improved ergonomic features + Make your day as comfortable as possible A PLANILUX ® Gerätebau Felix Schulte GmbH & Co. KG The Ergonomic PACS workplace The Ergonomic PACS ELTRONO Rangestr. 46-48, D-59581 Warstein | Phone: +49 (0) 29 02-97 13-0 | Fax: +49 (0) 29 02-97 13-88 | [email protected] | www.planilux.com FEATURE

The digital age in Medical Imaging How Does it Improve Services?

Authors Digital technology has revolutionised our lives. We for serial viewing, contrast enhancement Thomas J. Vogl (above) are collecting, storing, analysing, and using more and other benefits. Precise measurement M.G. Mack and more information at a faster and faster pace. of objects such as aortic aneurysms is pos- T. Lehnert X-ray imaging is no exception. Digital radiology, in sible. In addition, clinically important Department of Radiology which x-ray film is replaced with computer-gener- findings can be annotated for clinical and Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology ated images, is not an entirely new technique; re- educational purposes. Johann Wolfgang Goethe cent technologies, such as computed tomography University (CT), have always been digital. However, in recent Digital Software Allows Frankfurt, Germany [email protected] years, advances have come about that allow all Faster Processes diagnostic studies to exist as electronic files, Digital radiology software allows for requiring no film at all. simplified comparison of studies; for instance, side-by-side viewing of radio- graphs taken days, weeks, or longer apart Digital imaging provides rapid and improved flow of allows the radiologist to quickly note fine differences in diagnostic information. Electronic images can poten- appearance. The number of images that can be stored is tially be viewed immediately after acquisition on a limited only by the storage capacity of the archival sys- screen, rather than waiting for a film to be processed. In tem. Images stored digitally with proper backup mecha- practice, images can be available for viewing less than a nisms, are much less likely to be misplaced, misfiled, or minute after they are taken. Rather than being limited potentially destroyed; they are easily available regardless to diagnostic information existing on a single piece of of time of day or location to anyone who has proper film, digital images can be viewed simultaneously at dif- access to them. ferent locations. This enhances clinical care by permit- ting multiple care providers to view information that With the increasingly widespread use of computers in previously existed in only one location on a single film. the display of radiologic images, it is not surprising that In addition, consultation and discussion from multiple this technology is utilised in their interpretation as well. locations may occur, either from within the hospital or Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) of radiology studies at satellite locations. has shown promise in pulmonary and breast nodule de- tection and in evaluating chest radiographs for abnor- Accessing Quality Services mal asymmetry. A computer cannot replace the percep- Digital technology allows for remote access to radio- tion, intuition, and correlative abilities of a physician, graphic images. The advent of high-speed networks and but this technology does have the potential to further the internet has expanded the range of remote viewing increase the diagnostic accuracy of radiograph interpre- to be essentially any place with network and/or internet tation, leading to better clinical decision-making. access. Remote access to images relieves radiologists of the requirement of being physically in the hospital at Enhancing Education all times. The limitations of teleradiology are generally Digital radiology offers several enhancements to institu- related to technology such as remote access, network tions involved in education. The ability to manipulate speed and file size. These limitations are generally images allows educators to highlight important find- minimal with the use of newer technologies. Through ings easily; comparisons between normal and abnormal the use of teleradiology, even small hospitals can have studies, and the illustration of progressive changes in access to high-quality radiology interpretation on a pathology over time, aid in the development of diag- consistent basis. nostic competency. Digital images can also be easily transferred into presentations for educational confer- The ability to manipulate a digital image offers an ences. enormous diagnostic advantage over film. Software on viewing workstations permits the radiologist to utilise The initial implementation of an extensive digital radiol- zoom for a close-up of specific areas, digital subtrac- ogy system (including workstations, software, networks, tion for improving image definition, stacking of images continued on p. 28

24 FEATURE Part I: Intelligent Resource and Productivity Monitoring

Workflow Monitoring for PACS and RIS New Digital Management Tools Inform Radiology Managers

During 2007, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC) Clearly, we needed a more useful tool for accessing the Author implemented RIS/PACS. This technology, supported by ad- database and decided to reinforce our PACS purchase Wouter Verduyn vanced production and performance monitoring tools, has with Sectra’s Control Tower solution. Although prior Manager Department of Radiology enabled access to structured and easily-queried data, facili- to purchase we saw a demo and were given a ‘tour’ of Leiden University Medical tating cost savings and streamlining management processes the product, not until we put it into practice did we re- Centre in the department based on real-time facts and figures. ally see the benefits of the solution. In fact, though the Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] In this two-part series, radiology manager Wouter Verduyn system was only purchased last year, a new upgraded speaks about his experience with both intelligent IT solu- version was installed some weeks ago and we will hold tions for productivity management and the types of ground- a training workshop to really explore floor challenges they are designed to address. the full functionality of the product, Facts & Figures which promises to extract even more LUMC comprises Leiden University My job is as manager of the radiology department at complex information, such as patient Hospital and the Faculty of Medicine Leiden University Medical Centre in The Netherlands. waiting times. of Leiden University. The LUMC, I work in a management team of four radiologists as well which employs approximately 7000 as myself and the department Chair Prof. Hans Bloem. Typical Radiology people, is one of several academic medical centres in the Netherlands. I am responsible for areas such as investments, personnel Manager’s Day… The core tasks of the LUMC are: management and share responsibility with another man- Let me give you an example of my • Patient care: routine care, high- agement team member for patient care in the department. typical tasks to illustrate the sorts level clinical care, and in particular, of challenges we face. Last Tuesday high-level reference care. Digital Solutions for Better Management morning began at 8am with a man- • Research: both fundamental and In our institution, we are experiencing the constraints agement team meeting. We received bedside, healthcare-oriented research. • Education for the faculties of Med- of financial pressure. We aim to address this by both the approved 2008 imaging budget icine and Biomedical Sciences. allocating costs better through instigating activity-based three weeks ago and are making a • Training for residents to become costing projects and by increasing revenue through in- plan for its detailed allocation. This medical specialists creasing efficiency and new activities. To do this, we was followed up with a project meet- • Training for paramedics, such as needed to implement the latest digital solutions. ing on order management to elec- nurses and technicians • Additional training, both post-doc- tronically integrate orders from refer- toral and post-vocational. We are one of the last hospitals in Holland to implement ring physicians. a PACS system– we purchased our data storage system in 2005 (Dell EMC), but did not implement the RIS/ Afterwards, a meeting took place about understaffing PACS system (Sectra) until 2007. The final impetus was in the mammography department. After a staff mem- to be able to view images in electronic format across ber left, extra duties were passed to a senior radiolo- the entire hospital, to store images in the LUMC wide gist. Instead of hiring a new person, we will share the electronic patient records and for the IT department to roles between current staff members over the coming integrate storage in a holistic solution. one to two years. However, we would not so accurate- ly deal with these challenges, without the necessary The previous RIS, which was part of the HIS the LUMC reports and precise data to inform our decisions. still uses, was comparatively inefficient and the technol- ogy was at least 30 years old. It stored data but extract- The advantage of the Control Tower solution is hav- ing anything other than standard monthly reports was ing real-time data, e.g. we can see daily MRI levels, difficult. For any specific query, we had to commission per-doctor activity reports, CT waiting queues and an internal hospital ICT staff technician to write the get fast feedback on processing levels. Compared to query, which was time-consuming. The more complex the old system, the department is now far more inde- the query, the longer it took to be returned. Therefore pendent. This enables us to make intelligent decisions planning resource use, budgetary allocations, invest- for the sorts of daily challenges we face – planning for ments and hiring was neither a modern nor a stream- 2008 will bring new opportunities to implement this lined process, as the necessary information was not read- data to better operate in an environment of stagnant ily available to make informed choices. budgets and increased demands. ❉

25 FEATURE

Sharing Medical Data Across Organisations and Systems Driving Networked Expertise

Author The EU e-Health initiative and action plan is a Dr. Hanna Pohjonen driver for the sharing of patient information and Conceptually modern e-Health compris- (above) networking of expertise across different institutions es a number of layers. At the top there are Healthcare IT Consultant Rosalieco Oy and countries. It was launched in 2004 and will be clinical e-Services; professionals deliver Finland applied in its current form till 2010. Besides organi- these in virtual working environments - hanna.pohjonen@ sational eHealth, this initiative stimulates e-Health making use of various IT services – both rosalieco.fi at national-level. At the same time the focus is being generic and e-Service-specific. The IT shifted from in-border health to more integrated services themselves are supported by the healthcare provision across the EU. basic infrastructure services providing also the necessary interoperability for health- care service providers. Security and trust Modern e-Health emphasises citizen empowerment services are present at every layer. At the bottom there and citizens’ active participation in health and wellness are the local clinical and administrative information sys- management as well as coordinated resource sharing and tems producing the patient data to be transferred, stored, problem solving in dynamic, multi-institutional virtual shared and used on the upper layers. settings with equal participation by health professionals, patients and citizens. The keywords describing mod- The workflow of clinicians is patient-centric and also ern e-Health include patient/citizen-centric, seamless, highly nomadic – rarely are they able to accomplish all shared, secure and trusted, preventive, independent of necessary tasks by remaining at a single location for an ex- time and place, networked, cross-organisational, cross- tended period of time. However, clinicians have difficulty border and interoperable. in moving outside their own environments because of the need to have access to those IT systems that support their It emphasises two aspects: sharing patient information work. Similarly, contacts with patients at the bedside can and lining up a network of experts from different or- be challenging because disparate sources of patient data ganisations or different countries. Changing the work- need to be assembled for effective communication. ing environment so that patient information can be shared and the usage of networked expertise is easy and There are emerging generic technologies to support the commonplace, will deliver significant benefits by im- realisation of the e-Health community: generic patient proving availability of professionals; making specialist data repositories and streaming. The generic nature of capacity available to improve efficiencies in delivery and the future offerings opens the market that was tradition- to standardise working practices and enabling increased ally dominated by application vendors to ‘new comers’ knowledge sharing across organisational borders. as well. Hitachi Data Systems is a good example offer- ing both generic repositories to manage all data, but also Professionals need access to relevant patient data and streaming based viewers to retrieve and view the data. knowledge in order to identify the issues (diagnose) and plan for a strategy (therapy, care plan, workflow), with Generic Patient Data Repositories expected outcomes (monitoring/follow-up of progress/ The traditional images-only archives are being replaced quality of care). by new solutions which allow any type of fixed content data including images, laboratory results, video files, IT Supports the e-Health Community electronic patient data summaries, prescriptions, etc. to IT has a central role to play in the reorganisation of the be stored in one storage system and in a patient-centric healthcare service delivery environment by facilitating way. New generation enterprise archives are configured and enabling new trusted and secure ways of working, as network-attached systems and allow a set of standard collaboration and knowledge sharing. The generic IT interfaces and protocols – not just DICOM. The fu- services are common and can support any clinical e-Ser- ture repositories will form a GRID linked together via vice. Besides generic IT services, e-Service-specific tools nationwide registries; the European Health Insurance supporting a particular clinical e-Service implementa- Card (EHIC) will be used to access this GRID data in tion are needed. the coming years. ❉

26

Sharing of patient data is changing dramatically: from technology is used to overcome various limitations such ‘point-to-point’ to ‘many-to-many’. The recent IHE as limited bandwidth connections, clients that are not XDS and XDS-I profiles for cross-enterprise document powerful enough for the computation tasks required, and image sharing are being applied in several e-Health and the handling of large data sets. projects in Europe and Canada. In this architecture, IT systems like PACS act as sources and consumers of in- There are two types of streaming relevant in the health- formation. The data are stored in a repository and pub- care field. Intelligent downloading is a form of stream- lished in the metadata registry: this is how we separate ing where only the data required for immediate viewing IT systems from data and data from metadata. or processing are downloaded to a client. In general, processing of the data occurs locally on the client. Ad- Data Retrieval ditional downloading may occur in the background. In The metadata layer enables efficient searching and re- adaptive streaming of functionality, data are not down- trieval of patient data. The retention period for stored loaded to clients, only frame-buffer views of the data or information varies country by country and it is different results of data analyses are streamed. The power of the for images and other patient data. The new generation server is used to render final screen images, which are storage solutions allow intelligent information lifecycle then compressed and transmitted to client devices. management to automate and optimise storing of data taking different national legislations into account. The Advantages of Streaming Technology storage rules can be based on the DICOM metadata or There are several advantages with streaming technol- even diagnosis or other data in the metadata layer. ogy. First of all, network bandwidth can be used more effectively than with traditional web-based solutions The archives are changing from separate IT system at- involving data downloading. Because data can be pre- tached silos to common shared architectures, but at the vented from being downloaded to local clients, and only same time to e-Health platforms: the core is still ar- streamed for interactive viewing, an additional level of chiving, but there are data privacy and security services, data security can be provided. Additionally, streaming messaging services, patient’s informed consent, coding requires only a single copy of data to be stored, which services etc as well. The same platform can also be used is accessed as needed, rather than maintaining multiple for teaching and research. copies in order to meet distribution demands. Streaming also allows access to full processing functionality for all Streaming Technology for Data Viewing professionals; the clinicians can do 3D reconstructions Streaming is a potential emerging technology to view and other advanced post-processing using their own patient data from the generic repositories. Streaming laptops over low bandwidths. Even handheld mobile/ refers to sending portions of data from a source to a wireless devices can provide clinicians with enterprise- client for processing or viewing, rather than sending all wide access to all patient data and analysis tools on a the data first before processing or viewing. Streaming pervasive basis. ❉

continued from p. 24

and digital archives), requires financial resources and ity costs as well as operational advantages resulting in institutional commitment. The major financial benefit improved productivity and reduced turnaround times, of digital systems is due to reduction of film costs and but these issues are dependent on numerous specific or- staff. Film costs include processing, handling, storage ganisational changes. space, and, of course, the film itself. Information tech- nology and digital radiology system administrators need Conclusion to be hired, but overall staffing needs are reduced because Standing where we are in digital imaging, it is not of the elimination of film library functions and the in- hard to see that the future is digital. However, there creased productivity of technologists and radiologists. are still unanswered challenges to its implementa- tion, with the need to establish quality electronic Another financial justification for digital radiology has viewing, reduction of errors, and protection of pa- been the recovery of charges that were previously un- tient information. Multiple operational questions billable due to misplaced or lost films. Revenue that is need to be evaluated and answered. As we embrace otherwise lost from films without a final interpretation the filmless radiology departments, it is important can be a significant source of reimbursement. There to uphold evidence-based medicine and at the same is also a financial benefit due to improvements in risk time to provide a personalised medicine tailored to management and the corresponding reduction in liabil- the history of an individual patient. ❉

28 breakfast

lunch

coffee

wc

phone

WE ASKED HENRIK TO DESCRIBE HIS DAY

No, Henrik is not a radiologist. comes knocking on your door one fi ne morning. (To make He’s one of our PACS designers. sure we always deliver what you need, every single Sectra The only way he and his colleagues can design the employee has to visit customers at least twice a year.) PACS you need is to immerse themselves in your reality. To fi nd out why more than 950 PACS customers That’s why you get remote monitoring. And 24/7 worldwide reckon Henrik and his team do a pretty good support with helpdesk. And full RIS/PACS integration. job, head to www.sectra.com/medical. And scaleability. And don’t be surprised if Henrik himself

RIS/PACS MAMMOGRAPHY ORTHOPEDICS

8.125x10.875tum_Ad_henrik_US_V2_071109.indd 1 08-02-25 13.59.09 SUPPLIER ECRI INSTITUTE'S RECOM- MENDED SPECIFICATIONS1 GE HEALTHCARE GE HEALTHCARE GE HEALTHCARE GE HEALTHCARE MODEL High Field Strength Closed Signa HD 1.5T EchoSpeed Signa HD 1.5T HiSpeed Signa HDx 1.5T EchoSpeed Signa HDx 1.5T HDx Twin- Achieva 3.0T X-Series MRI Systems Speed WHERE MARKETED Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide

FDA CLEARANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CE MARK (MDD) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Magnetic Resonance CLINICAL APPLICATION High performance, whole body High performance, whole body High performance, whole body High performance, whole body Whole body Imaging Systems Product Comparison Chart MAGNET Configuration Closed Cylindrical high performance Cylindrical high performance Cylindrical high performance Cylindrical high performance Short-bore cylindrical ECRI Institute, a non-profit organisation, dedicates itself Strength 1.5 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 3 T to bringing the discipline of applied scientific research in healthcare to uncover the best approaches to improving Homogeneity, ppm V-RMS 0.45 LV-RMS: <0.05 ppm @ 10 cm, <0.25 LV-RMS: <0.05 ppm @ 10 cm, <0.25 LV-RMS: <0.05 ppm @ 10 cm, <0.25 LV-RMS: <0.05 ppm @ 10 cm, <0.25 0.5 ppm @ 40 cm, 0.12 ppm @ 30 ppm @ 20 cm, <0.50 ppm @ 30 cm, ppm @ 20 cm, <0.50 ppm @ 30 cm, ppm @ 20 cm, <0.50 ppm @ 30 cm, ppm @ 20 cm, <0.50 ppm @ 30 cm, cm, 0.3 ppm @ 20 cm, 0.004 ppm patient care. As pioneers in this science for nearly 40 years, <1.00 ppm @ 40 cm, <1.25 ppm @ <1.00 ppm @ 40 cm, <1.25 ppm @ <1.00 ppm @ 40 cm, <1.25 ppm @ <1.00 ppm @ 40 cm, <1.25 ppm @ @ 10 cm ECRI Institute marries experience and independence with 45 cm, < 2.00 ppm @ 48 cm 45 cm, < 2.00 ppm @ 48 cm 45 cm, < 2.00 ppm @ 48 cm 45 cm, < 2.00 ppm @ 48 cm the objectivity of evidence-based research. Dimensions of maximum useful FOV 50 48 x 48 x 48 48 x 48 x 48 48 x 48 x 48 48 x 48 x 48 50 x 50 x 45 and homogeneity, (x, y, z), cm TABLE ECRI Institute’s focus is medical device technology, healthcare risk and Detachable Standard, completely detachable Standard, completely detachable Standard, completely detachable Standard, completely detachable Trolley quality management, and health technology assessment. It provides infor- mation services and technical assistance to more than 5,000 hospitals, Dimensions, L x W, cm 213.4 (L) 213.4 (L) 213.4 (L) 213.4 (L) healthcare organisations, ministries of health, government and planning Horizontal speed, cm/s 10.26 10.26 10.26 10.26 2, 8, 18 agencies, voluntary sector organisations and accrediting agencies world- Elevating Standard Standard Standard Standard Yes wide. Its databases (over 30), publications, information services and tech- Retractable armrest Standard, both sides Standard, both sides Standard, both sides Standard, both sides Not specified nical assistance services set the standard for the healthcare community. Minimum height, cm 68.58 (27 in) 68.58 (27 in) 68.58 (27 in) 68.58 (27 in) 52 Limited mobility 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) 250 (550) horizontal travel More than 5,000 healthcare organisations worldwide rely on ECRI Fully mobile 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) vertical travel Institute’s expertise in patient safety improvement, risk and quality ACOUSTIC NOISE management, healthcare processes, devices, procedures and drug tech- Sound pressure level (SPL) at peak Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified <25 with headset nology. ECRI Institute is one of only a handful of organisations designat- gradient amplitude and slew rate, dB(A) Reduction technology Vibroacoustic mat Vibroacoustic mat Vibroacoustic mat Vibroacoustic mat, vacuum sealed SofTone ed as both a Collaborating Centre of the World Health Organisation gradient coil and an evidence-based practice centre by the US Agency for healthcare research and quality.

For more information, visit www.ecri.org GRADIENT SYSTEM Standard name EchoSpeed HiSpeed EchoSpeed TwinSpeed Quasar Standard strength, z-axis, mT/m 20, 40 33 33 33 50 40

Contact Standard slew rate, z-axis, T/m/s 150 120 77 120 150 120 ECRI Institute Europe Weltech Centre Ridgeway, Welwyn Garden RF SYSTEM City, Herts AL7 2AA, Power output, kW 21 body, 4 head 21 body, 4 head 21 body, 4 head 21 body, 4 head 25 [email protected] Amplifier type Solid-state Solid-state Solid-state Solid-state Solid-state www.ecri.org.uk Standard number of channels 4, 8, or 16 4, 8, or 16 8, 16, or 32 8, 16, or 32 8 Number of channel elements Not specified Not specified 29 (HNS array) 29 (HNS array) Not Specified Optional channel configurations 4, 8, or 16 4 or 8 8, 16, or 32 8, 16, or 32 16, 32 Receiver bandwidth, kHz 100 100 100 100 300 Location of coil connector (plug) Gantry Gantry Gantry Gantry Gantry face Standard length of coil cables, m Variable Variable Variable Variable 1.2 Footnotes to the Product Comparison Chart 1 These recommendations are the opinions of ECRI Institute’s technology experts. Number of coil connectors (plugs) Dual connector port Dual connector port Dual connector port Dual connector port 2 ECRI Institute assumes no liability for decisions made based on this data. Coil tuning technique Auto tuning Auto tuning Auto tuning Auto tuning Automatic 2 The system is equiped with the Atlas coil concept that comprises of anterior and posterior coil segments that can be combined, facilitating organ specific and whole body LAST UPDATED Sep-07 Sep-07 Sep-07 Sep-07 Sep-07 imaging without the need of coil replacement. Through this concept the workflow has OTHER SPECIFICATIONS None specified. None specified. None specified. None specified. Also available in a mobile configura- been improved dramatically tion; optional Ambient Experience; 480 V, 65 kVA, 80 A for the system; 480V, 9 kVA, 30 A for the cryocooler Publication of all submitted data is not possible: for further information please compressor; 480 V, 55 A for the contact ECRI Institute or [email protected]. Schreiber chiller.

30 Product Comparison Chart

SUPPLIER ECRI INSTITUTE'S RECOM- MENDED SPECIFICATIONS1 GE HEALTHCARE GE HEALTHCARE GE HEALTHCARE GE HEALTHCARE MODEL High Field Strength Closed Signa HD 1.5T EchoSpeed Signa HD 1.5T HiSpeed Signa HDx 1.5T EchoSpeed Signa HDx 1.5T HDx Twin- Achieva 3.0T X-Series MRI Systems Speed WHERE MARKETED Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide

FDA CLEARANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CE MARK (MDD) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CLINICAL APPLICATION High performance, whole body High performance, whole body High performance, whole body High performance, whole body Whole body

MAGNET Configuration Closed Cylindrical high performance Cylindrical high performance Cylindrical high performance Cylindrical high performance Short-bore cylindrical Strength 1.5 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 3 T

Homogeneity, ppm V-RMS 0.45 LV-RMS: <0.05 ppm @ 10 cm, <0.25 LV-RMS: <0.05 ppm @ 10 cm, <0.25 LV-RMS: <0.05 ppm @ 10 cm, <0.25 LV-RMS: <0.05 ppm @ 10 cm, <0.25 0.5 ppm @ 40 cm, 0.12 ppm @ 30 ppm @ 20 cm, <0.50 ppm @ 30 cm, ppm @ 20 cm, <0.50 ppm @ 30 cm, ppm @ 20 cm, <0.50 ppm @ 30 cm, ppm @ 20 cm, <0.50 ppm @ 30 cm, cm, 0.3 ppm @ 20 cm, 0.004 ppm <1.00 ppm @ 40 cm, <1.25 ppm @ <1.00 ppm @ 40 cm, <1.25 ppm @ <1.00 ppm @ 40 cm, <1.25 ppm @ <1.00 ppm @ 40 cm, <1.25 ppm @ @ 10 cm 45 cm, < 2.00 ppm @ 48 cm 45 cm, < 2.00 ppm @ 48 cm 45 cm, < 2.00 ppm @ 48 cm 45 cm, < 2.00 ppm @ 48 cm Dimensions of maximum useful FOV 50 48 x 48 x 48 48 x 48 x 48 48 x 48 x 48 48 x 48 x 48 50 x 50 x 45 and homogeneity, (x, y, z), cm TABLE Detachable Standard, completely detachable Standard, completely detachable Standard, completely detachable Standard, completely detachable Trolley

Dimensions, L x W, cm 213.4 (L) 213.4 (L) 213.4 (L) 213.4 (L) Horizontal speed, cm/s 10.26 10.26 10.26 10.26 2, 8, 18 Elevating Standard Standard Standard Standard Yes Retractable armrest Standard, both sides Standard, both sides Standard, both sides Standard, both sides Not specified Minimum height, cm 68.58 (27 in) 68.58 (27 in) 68.58 (27 in) 68.58 (27 in) 52 Limited mobility 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) 250 (550) horizontal travel Fully mobile 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) 159 (350) vertical travel ACOUSTIC NOISE Sound pressure level (SPL) at peak Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified <25 with headset gradient amplitude and slew rate, dB(A) Reduction technology Vibroacoustic mat Vibroacoustic mat Vibroacoustic mat Vibroacoustic mat, vacuum sealed SofTone gradient coil

GRADIENT SYSTEM Standard name EchoSpeed HiSpeed EchoSpeed TwinSpeed Quasar Standard strength, z-axis, mT/m 20, 40 33 33 33 50 40

Standard slew rate, z-axis, T/m/s 150 120 77 120 150 120

RF SYSTEM Power output, kW 21 body, 4 head 21 body, 4 head 21 body, 4 head 21 body, 4 head 25 Amplifier type Solid-state Solid-state Solid-state Solid-state Solid-state Standard number of channels 4, 8, or 16 4, 8, or 16 8, 16, or 32 8, 16, or 32 8 Number of channel elements Not specified Not specified 29 (HNS array) 29 (HNS array) Not Specified Optional channel configurations 4, 8, or 16 4 or 8 8, 16, or 32 8, 16, or 32 16, 32 Receiver bandwidth, kHz 100 100 100 100 300 Location of coil connector (plug) Gantry Gantry Gantry Gantry Gantry face Standard length of coil cables, m Variable Variable Variable Variable 1.2 Number of coil connectors (plugs) Dual connector port Dual connector port Dual connector port Dual connector port 2 Coil tuning technique Auto tuning Auto tuning Auto tuning Auto tuning Automatic LAST UPDATED Sep-07 Sep-07 Sep-07 Sep-07 Sep-07 OTHER SPECIFICATIONS None specified. None specified. None specified. None specified. Also available in a mobile configura- tion; optional Ambient Experience; 480 V, 65 kVA, 80 A for the system; 480V, 9 kVA, 30 A for the cryocooler compressor; 480 V, 55 A for the Schreiber chiller.

31 Product Comparison Chart

SUPPLIER ECRI INSTITUTE'S RECOM- MENDED SPECIFICATIONS1 MODEL High Field Strength Closed INTERA 1.5T Panorama HFO MAGNETOM Espree MAGNETOM Essenza MAGNETOM Symphony MAGNETOM Trio MAGNETOM Verio 1.5T Excelart Vantage Atlas MRI Systems Power WHERE MARKETED Worldwide Worldwide Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide Europe, Japan, US South America FDA CLEARANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CE MARK (MDD) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CLINICAL APPLICATION Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body

MAGNET Configuration Closed Short-bore cylindrical Open, two-post Superconductive, short bore Superconductive, short bore Superconductive, short bore Superconductive, short bore Superconductive, short bore Ultra-short (149 cm) bore Strength 1.5 T 1.5 T 1 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 3 T 3 T 1.5 T

Homogeneity, ppm V-RMS 0.45 1.4 ppm @ 53 cm, 1.18 ppm @ 50 2.8 ppm @ 45 cm, 1 ppm @ 40 ≤5 ppm @ 40 x 40 x 40, 2.8 ppm @ 7.5 (typical 6 ppm) ppm @ 45 x 45 0.4 ppm, guaranteed 1 ppm based <0.25 at 40 cm DSV, 0.8 at 45 cm 4.0 (typical 3.6) ppm @ 50 x 50 x <1 ppm cm, 0.5 ppm @ 40 cm, 0.07 ppm cm, 0.01 ppm @ 30 cm, 0.03 ppm 45 x 45 x 30 (typical 24-plot plane) x 30 cm DSV, 2.2 (typical 1.9) ppm on 24-plane plot DSV, 1.5 at 50 cm DSV 45 cm DSV, 1.6 (typical 1.2) ppm @ 30 cm, 0.03 ppm @ 20 cm, 0.01 @ 20 cm @ 40 x 40 x 30 cm DSV, V-RMS @ 40 DSV, V-RMS (based on ppm @ 10 cm (based on 24-plane plot) 24-plane plot) Dimensions of maximum useful FOV 50 53 x 53 x 48 45 x 45 x 45 45 x 45 x 30 45 x 45 x 30 50 x 50 x 50 50 x 50 x 50 50 x 50 x 45 55 x 55 x 50 at ≤2 ppm and homogeneity, (x, y, z), cm TABLE Detachable Trolley Yes Optional removable tabletop and Optional Optional Optional Optional removable tabletop and No trolley trolley Dimensions, L x W, cm N/A 80 x 240 243 x 54 243 x 54 243 x 54 Not specified 238 x 63 242 x 57 Horizontal speed, cm/s 2, 8, 18 2, 8, 18 20 20 20 20 20 2 / 15 / 20 Elevating Yes Yes Standard Standard free-floating Standard free-floating Standard Standard Standard Retractable armrest Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Both sides Minimum height, cm 52 57 48 55 47 Not specified 50 43 Limited mobility 250 (550) horizontal travel 250 (550) 250 (550) 200 (440) 200 (440) 250 (550) 250 (550) Fully mobile 159 (350) vertical travel 250 (550) 250 (550) 200 (440) 200 (440) 250 (550) 250 (550) 200 (440) ACOUSTIC NOISE 200 (440) Sound pressure level (SPL) at peak <25 with headset <25 with headset 115.6 93 V engine 120 Quantum 102 115 < 90dBA gradient amplitude and slew rate, dB(A) Reduction technology SofTone SofTone Gradients incorporate special design Antivibration mounting, noise reduc- Antivibration mounting, noise reduc- Antivibration mounting, noise reduc- Antivibration mounting, noise reduc- Vacuum enclosed gradient coils features (epoxy resin), torque com- tion, systems integration, whisper tion, systems integration, whisper tion, systems integration, whisper tion, systems integration, whisper (Pianissimo) pensation, stiff suspension, features; mode, others mode, others mode, others mode, others magnet encapsulated with optimized composite material; noise-optimized cold head GRADIENT SYSTEM Standard name Pulsar Pulsar Z engine V engine Sprint TQ gradient VQ gradient XGV, ZGV Standard strength, z-axis, mT/m 20, 40 33 26 33 true each axis value; 52 vector 30 true each axis value; 52 vector 30 true each axis value; 35 vector 45, in x, y, z-axis 45, in x, y, z-axis 30, 33 summation summation summation Standard slew rate, z-axis, T/m/s 150 80 80 100 true each axis value; 173 vector 100 true each axis value; 173 vector 75 true each axis value; 130 vector 200 200 130, 200 respectively summation summation summation RF SYSTEM Power output, kW 18 10 22.4 peak; 500 kHz transmitter BW 15 15 35 33 20 Amplifier type Solid-state Solid-state Not specified Solid-state Solid-state Compact air cooled Compact air cooled Solid state Standard number of channels 6, 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 16 / 32 WIP Number of channel elements Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Max 32 in FOV Optional channel configurations Not specified Not specified 18 N/A 18, and 32 with Tim upgrade 18, 32 18, 32 32 WIP Receiver bandwidth, kHz 100 300 500-1,000 receiver BW 1,000 per channel 1,000 per channel 1,000 per channel 1,000 per channel 1,000 Location of coil connector (plug) Gantry face Table Patient table Patient table Patient table Patient table Patient table Couch & Gantry Standard length of coil cables, m 1.2 1.2 0.15-1.2 Coil dependent Coil dependent Variable Variable Coil dependent Number of coil connectors (plugs) 2 3 10 4 5 10 10 9 & 1 respectively Coil tuning technique Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic LAST UPDATED Sep-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Nov-07 Nov-07 Nov-07 Nov-07 Mar-08 OTHER SPECIFICATIONS 480 V, 65 kVA, 80 A for the system; Optional Ambient Experience; 480 V, Head-out scanning for more than None specified. None specified. None specified. None specified. Vantage Atlas systems are short 480V, 9 kVA, 30 A for the cryo- 65 kVA, 80 A for the system; 480V, 60% of routine scanning. (1.49 m), large clinical FOV (55 cm cooler compressor; 480 V, 55 A for 9 kVA, 30 A for the cryocooler x 55 cm x 50 cm), possesses high the Schreiber chiller. compressor; 480 V, 55 A for the homogeneity at <2 ppm over a full Schreiber chiller. 55 x 55 x 50 DSV. 2

32 Product Comparison Chart

SUPPLIER ECRI INSTITUTE'S RECOM- MENDED SPECIFICATIONS1 MODEL High Field Strength Closed INTERA 1.5T Panorama HFO MAGNETOM Espree MAGNETOM Essenza MAGNETOM Symphony MAGNETOM Trio MAGNETOM Verio 1.5T Excelart Vantage Atlas MRI Systems Power WHERE MARKETED Worldwide Worldwide Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide Worldwide Europe, Japan, US South America FDA CLEARANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CE MARK (MDD) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CLINICAL APPLICATION Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body Whole body

MAGNET Configuration Closed Short-bore cylindrical Open, two-post Superconductive, short bore Superconductive, short bore Superconductive, short bore Superconductive, short bore Superconductive, short bore Ultra-short (149 cm) bore Strength 1.5 T 1.5 T 1 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 1.5 T 3 T 3 T 1.5 T

Homogeneity, ppm V-RMS 0.45 1.4 ppm @ 53 cm, 1.18 ppm @ 50 2.8 ppm @ 45 cm, 1 ppm @ 40 ≤5 ppm @ 40 x 40 x 40, 2.8 ppm @ 7.5 (typical 6 ppm) ppm @ 45 x 45 0.4 ppm, guaranteed 1 ppm based <0.25 at 40 cm DSV, 0.8 at 45 cm 4.0 (typical 3.6) ppm @ 50 x 50 x <1 ppm cm, 0.5 ppm @ 40 cm, 0.07 ppm cm, 0.01 ppm @ 30 cm, 0.03 ppm 45 x 45 x 30 (typical 24-plot plane) x 30 cm DSV, 2.2 (typical 1.9) ppm on 24-plane plot DSV, 1.5 at 50 cm DSV 45 cm DSV, 1.6 (typical 1.2) ppm @ 30 cm, 0.03 ppm @ 20 cm, 0.01 @ 20 cm @ 40 x 40 x 30 cm DSV, V-RMS @ 40 DSV, V-RMS (based on ppm @ 10 cm (based on 24-plane plot) 24-plane plot) Dimensions of maximum useful FOV 50 53 x 53 x 48 45 x 45 x 45 45 x 45 x 30 45 x 45 x 30 50 x 50 x 50 50 x 50 x 50 50 x 50 x 45 55 x 55 x 50 at ≤2 ppm and homogeneity, (x, y, z), cm TABLE Detachable Trolley Yes Optional removable tabletop and Optional Optional Optional Optional removable tabletop and No trolley trolley Dimensions, L x W, cm N/A 80 x 240 243 x 54 243 x 54 243 x 54 Not specified 238 x 63 242 x 57 Horizontal speed, cm/s 2, 8, 18 2, 8, 18 20 20 20 20 20 2 / 15 / 20 Elevating Yes Yes Standard Standard free-floating Standard free-floating Standard Standard Standard Retractable armrest Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Both sides Minimum height, cm 52 57 48 55 47 Not specified 50 43 Limited mobility 250 (550) horizontal travel 250 (550) 250 (550) 200 (440) 200 (440) 250 (550) 250 (550) Fully mobile 159 (350) vertical travel 250 (550) 250 (550) 200 (440) 200 (440) 250 (550) 250 (550) 200 (440) ACOUSTIC NOISE 200 (440) Sound pressure level (SPL) at peak <25 with headset <25 with headset 115.6 93 V engine 120 Quantum 102 115 < 90dBA gradient amplitude and slew rate, dB(A) Reduction technology SofTone SofTone Gradients incorporate special design Antivibration mounting, noise reduc- Antivibration mounting, noise reduc- Antivibration mounting, noise reduc- Antivibration mounting, noise reduc- Vacuum enclosed gradient coils features (epoxy resin), torque com- tion, systems integration, whisper tion, systems integration, whisper tion, systems integration, whisper tion, systems integration, whisper (Pianissimo) pensation, stiff suspension, features; mode, others mode, others mode, others mode, others magnet encapsulated with optimized composite material; noise-optimized cold head GRADIENT SYSTEM Standard name Pulsar Pulsar Z engine V engine Sprint TQ gradient VQ gradient XGV, ZGV Standard strength, z-axis, mT/m 20, 40 33 26 33 true each axis value; 52 vector 30 true each axis value; 52 vector 30 true each axis value; 35 vector 45, in x, y, z-axis 45, in x, y, z-axis 30, 33 summation summation summation Standard slew rate, z-axis, T/m/s 150 80 80 100 true each axis value; 173 vector 100 true each axis value; 173 vector 75 true each axis value; 130 vector 200 200 130, 200 respectively summation summation summation RF SYSTEM Power output, kW 18 10 22.4 peak; 500 kHz transmitter BW 15 15 35 33 20 Amplifier type Solid-state Solid-state Not specified Solid-state Solid-state Compact air cooled Compact air cooled Solid state Standard number of channels 6, 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 16 / 32 WIP Number of channel elements Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Not specified Max 32 in FOV Optional channel configurations Not specified Not specified 18 N/A 18, and 32 with Tim upgrade 18, 32 18, 32 32 WIP Receiver bandwidth, kHz 100 300 500-1,000 receiver BW 1,000 per channel 1,000 per channel 1,000 per channel 1,000 per channel 1,000 Location of coil connector (plug) Gantry face Table Patient table Patient table Patient table Patient table Patient table Couch & Gantry Standard length of coil cables, m 1.2 1.2 0.15-1.2 Coil dependent Coil dependent Variable Variable Coil dependent Number of coil connectors (plugs) 2 3 10 4 5 10 10 9 & 1 respectively Coil tuning technique Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic LAST UPDATED Sep-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Nov-07 Nov-07 Nov-07 Nov-07 Mar-08 OTHER SPECIFICATIONS 480 V, 65 kVA, 80 A for the system; Optional Ambient Experience; 480 V, Head-out scanning for more than None specified. None specified. None specified. None specified. Vantage Atlas systems are short 480V, 9 kVA, 30 A for the cryo- 65 kVA, 80 A for the system; 480V, 60% of routine scanning. (1.49 m), large clinical FOV (55 cm cooler compressor; 480 V, 55 A for 9 kVA, 30 A for the cryocooler x 55 cm x 50 cm), possesses high the Schreiber chiller. compressor; 480 V, 55 A for the homogeneity at <2 ppm over a full Schreiber chiller. 55 x 55 x 50 DSV. 2

33 Technical Analysis of Radiolucent Breast Cushions

n Corporate Presentation

Addressing Mammography-Related Pain

Contributors Although numerous studies have assessed the magnitude of mography, it is necessary to establish that the Patricia Hall, Hologic, Inc. primary objective of the product, reducing R. Edward Hendrick, mammography-associated pain, the variability of test instruments Ph.D., FACR, Breast pain associated with mammography, can be Imaging Consultant makes it difficult to reliably quantify the severity and incidence met and that there are no detrimental ef- of this problem. The most frequently reported source of pain in fects on the quality of the mammograms, as measured by: (i) image quality and dose; (ii) mammography is compression, followed by discomfort caused adequate tissue acquisition; and, (iii) achieve- by the sharp edges of the image receptor, and contact with the ment of acceptable levels of compression. cold surface of the breast support. Until recently, pain control was Comfort Assessments limited to the use of relaxation techniques and patient controlled Three large, independent studies1, 2, 3 enrolled compression, with no viable method for addressing pain caused by patients reporting for routine screening to the physical structure of the mammography system. evaluate whether use of radiolucent cush- ions resulted in increased comfort. In these studies, both the CC and MLO view for one breast was used as a control (uncushioned), In February 2001, the Hologic MammoPad® ra- underside. The cushion is placed over the image while the other breast was cushioned. Fol- diolucent breast cushion received 510(k) mar- receptor, providing a softer and warmer surface lowing the exam, patients rated the level of keting clearance from the US Food and Drug on which the breast can rest during the exam. pain for each breast using either a visual ana- Administration (FDA) for use in mammography logue scale (VAS) or paired numerical rating exams. MammoPad is a soft, compressible, single- To determine whether the use of breast scale (NRS). Statistically significant levels of use foam cushion with a low-tack adhesive on the cushions is a viable and effective aid to mam- pain reduction were seen in all studies, with 66.0% to 73.5% of patients realising at least a 10% reduction of pain (the benefited group). The average reduction of pain ranged from 33.0% to 52.6%.

Studies were performed using cushions on both the image receptor and compression paddle. Today, most practices incorporating the use of breast cushions customarily use a single cushion on the image receptor only and report no discernable reduction in com- fort levels. One study4, has shown that the use of breast cushions may reduce mammog- raphy pain by 25% to 50% for women who have previously undergone lumpectomy and radiation therapy.

Image Quality and Dose Two methods have been used to evaluate im- age quality with the use of breast cushions; (i) studies using blinded, side-by-side compari- sons of images of cushioned versus uncush- ioned breasts and (ii) evaluations involving

Radiolucent breast cushion applied to image receptor. The low-tack adhesive in the pad does not leave residue on the receptor. contrast-detail phantoms and ACR phantom images. Both types of evaluations report no

34 IM_Selenia_Ad.qxd:Layout 1 2/11/08 6:48 PM Page 1

DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY degradation of image quality or statistically or clinically significant increase in dose when the breast cushion was used.

COMPRESSION AND COMPRESSION MARKS Researchers and technologists credit the gripping ability of the MammoPad with enhanced comfort and warmth, which leads to increased relaxation of involved muscles. The body of avail- able published literature supports the fact that the use of breast cushions does not compromise adequate compression; in fact, it has shown that, for many patients, greater compression can be achieved with breast cushions.

Some facilities using breast cushions have experienced random, sporadic occurrences of images showing lighter, circular or oval- shaped areas of contrast within the breast tissue, a phenomenon known as a compression mark. These infrequent occurrences have been limited to large, fatty-replaced breasts. A compression mark may appear with or without breast cushions when uneven compression of the breast occurs.

Image Quality and Tissue Acquisition Different case studies5, 6, 7 have shown average increases in tissue acquisition at the chest wall for all screening views ranging from 0.27cm to 0.61cm in side-by-side comparisons with images of ex- ams from the previous year. These three studies looked at the per- centage of views showing increased tissue acquisition of 1.24 cm or greater, a measurement felt by clinicians to have greater clinical relevance. The average percentage of views meeting this criteria was 15.4% of all views in the 3 studies, with ranges from 10.7% Selenia. to 19.7%. In addition to increased tissue acquisition, researchers report increases of 20% or more in the amount of pectoral muscle visualized7 and openness of the inframammary fold7. Not all digital mammography systems are created equal Discussion The use of radiolucent breast cushions has been shown to pro- Selenia™ direct capture digital technology completely vide a significant reduction in mammography-associated pain for eliminates light scatter, giving you an unbeatable combination a majority of women. It has also been clearly demonstrated that of incredibly sharp and high contrast images in a matter of this increase in comfort can be achieved without a trade-off in seconds. Our new MammoPad™ radiolucent breast cushion reduced image quality or increased dose. In addition, with ap- creates a warm, soft surface between the patient and the propriate training, tissue acquisition can be enhanced when the mammography detector that helps relax the patient, often cushion is used and compression force can be increased without resulting in better tissue acquisition. a resultant increase in discomfort. Combine the power of Selenia, SecurView™ workstations, 1. Tabar L, Lebovic GS, Hermann GD, Kaufman CS, Alexander C, Sayre J. Clinical assessment of a and R2 ImageChecker™ computer aided detection with radiolucent cushion for mammography. Acta Radiologica 2004;45: 154-158 the comfort of MammoPad, and you’ll have a combination 2. Markle L, Roux S, Sayre J. Reduction of discomfort during mammography utilizing a radiolucent cushioning pad. The Breast Journal; Volume 10, Number 4, 2004: 345-349 that can’t be beat.

3. Dibble S, Israel J, Nussey B, Sayre J, Brenner RJ, Sickles, E. Mammography with breast cushions. Women’s Health Issues 15 (2005) 55-63 In the fight against breast cancer, early detection means

4. Miller L. Addressing mammography pain. RT Image January 6, 2003, Volume 16: 8-10 hope for millions of women. Find out more about our

5. Everett-Massetti E, Watt AC. Use of a mammography comfort aid and education to improve solutions for women's health. Call +1.781.999.7300, breast positioning. NCBC 15th Annual Interdisciplinary Breast Center Conference; Las Vegas, e-mail [email protected] or visit www.hologic.com. Nevada; February/March 2005

6. Coryell T. Increasing mammography tissue acquisition through positioning training and use of a foam breast cushion. NCBC 16th Annual Interdisciplinary Breast Conference; March 12-16, 2006; Together we can make a difference. Las Vegas, Nevada

7. Jaeger B, Waller P, Coryell T. Use of a mammography breast cushion and technologist training in- creases tissue acquisition, enables greater compression, and reduces discomfort for patients. NCBC Come See 17th Annual National Interdisciplinary Breast Conference; February 24-28, 2007; Las Vegas, Nevada Hologic at ECR COUNTRY FOCUS: Austria

Overview of the Austrian health and hospital system

Austria is a democratic republic and a federal state which is composed nine Länder. The Länder have their legislative com- petencies and also participate in legislation at a federal in the Bundesrat (upper house of parliament).

The Austrian healthcare system is characterised by the laws. The social health insurance system, which is the federalist structure of the country, the delegation of com- most important source of financing, provided a total of petencies to self-governing stakeholders in the social in- 45,3% of total healthcare expenditure in 2004. Manda- surance system as well as by cross-stakeholder structures tory insurance is based on membership of an occupa- at federal and Länder level which possess competencies tional group or place of residence; thus there is no com- in cooperative planning, coordination and financing. petition between health insurance funds. According to the Federal Constitution, almost all areas of the healthcare system are primarily the regulatory 25% of total healthcare expenditure is financed by the responsibility of the federal government. The most im- federal government, the Länder and local authorities. portant exception is the hospital sector. In this area, the 10% of this share was accounted for by tax financed federal government is only responsible for enacting basic long-term care cash benefits. The latter have been paid law; legislation on implementation and enforcement is out to people in need of long-term care since 1993. the responsibility of the nine Länder. In 2004, around 25% of healthcare expenditure was The various sectors of the healthcare system have tradi- financed privately. Private households bore 13,5% of tionally been characterised by different stakeholders and healthcare expenditure by means of indirect cost-sharing regulation- and financing mechanisms. However, in re- (services whose costs were fully borne by the insured) cent years there have been increased eddorts to introduce and 7,6% by means of direct cost sharing (co-payments). decision-making and financing flows which are effective Direct cost sharing was increased in recent years and af- across all sectors. fects almost every service provided by social health insur- ance; however, the outpatient clinics fee introduced in Since 2002, all the Länder, except Vienna, as well as 2001 was withdrawn again in 2005 due to the high costs some of the private non-profit owners have privatised involved in its implementation and the considerable re- their hospitals, mainly in the form of organisational sistance it had encountered. privatisations. The various private operating compa- nies have one thing in common: they are responsible Delivery System for the management of hospitals, whereas the Länder Those covered by health insurance can freely choose be- or local authorities as (majority) owners usually act tween service providers in the outpatient sector, of whom as a guarantor. The Austrian healthcare system has the majority work in individual practices. In addition, developed almost completely into a model which is outpatient clinics and hospital outpatient departments. mainly based on decentralised contracts with all ser- vice providers. Compared to 1980, the number of practising physicians and dentists has risen at an over-average rate, with the Healthcare Financing figures for both professions actually doubling. There The financing of the healthcare system is pluralistic in is a considerable variation in the density of physicians accordance with the constitution and social insurance between the Länder. The number of nursing staff also

36 doubled between 1980 and 2003 to 6 per 1000 inhabit- development of a points model for medical follow-up ants. However, it was still clearly below the EU average care, transfers between departments and hospitals, and of 7,3 in 2003. readmissions. The coordination of the Austrian DRG model with the services supplied in hospital outpa- Hospitals which are listed in the hospital plan of a Land are tient departments and private practice is to be achieved subject to public law (“fund hospitals”) and have a statutory through the harmonisation of documentation and the requirement to provide care and to admit patients. They are separation of the contents and the scoring of flat rates entitled to legally prescribed subsidies from public sources per case from other areas of care provision. In addition, for investments, maintenance and running costs. The ra- a performance-orientated financing concept is to be de- tion of beds to inhabitants of 6,1 beds per 1000 persons is veloped for the outpatient sector which is coordinated clearly above the EU average. The average length of stay, 6 with the inpatient sector. days is shorter than the EU average, the utilisation of bed capacity at 76% marginally below. The creation of a new instrument of cooperation designed to provide motivation for cooperation between financing With the passing of the 1993 Federal Long-Term Care bodies is closely linked to the structure of raising fund- Act, Austria reacted comparatively early to the approach- ing for hospital financing. Important impulses for cost- ing demographic challenges. Like acute inpatient care, containment will result from this cooperation if the stake- long-term care too is a sector where federal cooperation holders involved interact in a constructive manner. instruments are used, specifically to ensure the uniformi- ty of entitlement criteria and quality standards of long- Conclusion term care institutions. In the past 25 years, the stakeholders in the Austrian health- care system have succeeded, characteristically by means of Health Reforms cooperative agreements and planning, in ensuring almost Health reforms have primarily dealt with cost contain- universal healthcare provision with a comprehensive benefit ment (by exploiting potential for more efficiency and catalogue, in spite of considerable increases in expenditure raising cost sharing) and with structural reforms to and continuing cost containment measures. improve the planning of capacities, the cooperation of stakeholders and the coordination of financing flows. Waiting times for medical treatment are rarely discussed in public and can be viewed as short in comparison to In the acute hospital care sector organisational privatisa- other countries, although there has been no precise evalu- tions were performed which was essentially completed by ation of this. However, the supply structure is character- 2002. The reimbursement of services and medicines by ised by inequalities between the Länder and also between social health insurance has been more strongly linked to urban and rural areas. Altogether, life expectancy and health technology assessment, but only a small number most of the documented health indicators have improved of benefits have been excluded. At the same time, new markedly in the past 15 years. The level of satisfaction of benefits have been introduced, such as federal long-term the population with the healthcare system continues to be care benefit, psychotherapy, preventive services, and new high in an international comparison. structures for community-based long-term care. Sectoral fragmentation, which also creates the bias to- Contribution revenue has been increased and the con- wards hospital care, is a long standing weakness of the tribution rates of some groups of the insured brought Austrian healthcare system. In spite of numerous efforts, into line, but the revenue base has not been fundamen- it has until now been possible, in the sense of allocative tally changed. Quality assurance requirements have been efficiency, to allow funding to follow the services pro- raised and patients’ rights have been strengthened by a vided across sectoral borders. Nor has it been possible charter and patients’ ombudpersons. to structure the supply chain in a more needs-orientated way across these administrative and financial barriers at DRG System the sectoral borders, especially between outpatient and The Austrian DRG system o f hospital financing is devel- inpatient care or acute and long-term care. oping. Its main focuses are the inclusion of the promo- tion of day care services and the updating of the model The planning, structures and funds introduced since through calculations using a revised calculation guide 2005 permit for the first time the cross-sectoral steering based on updated hospital cost accounting. Further- of capacities and financing flows. They also provide for more, integrated supply concepts and the reduction of incentives for improved interface management and inte- the burden on inpatient care are to be promoted by the grated forms of care. ❉

37 Author Guidelines

Content images with 300dpi) and their order of placement in the article IMAGING Management welcomes submissions from qualified, must be clearly indicated. Only the electronic formats _.tif_ or experienced professionals active in the imaging industry, related _.jpeg_ can be used for images, i.e. not Microsoft Word or Pow- technology companies and medical healthcare professionals with erPoint. Images must be no smaller than 9cm x 9cm at 100% an interest in imaging-related topics and themes. We are particu- scale. Only images meeting these specifications can be published. larly interested in articles focusing on management or practice If an image has been published before, permission to reproduce issues and therefore accept scientific papers with a clear con- the material must be obtained by the author from the copyright nection to these areas. Articles must be written by independent holder and the original source acknowledged in the text, e.g. © authorities, and any sponsors for research named. Our editorial 2004 Dervla Gleeson. policy means that articles must present an unbiased view, and avoid ‘promotional’ or biased content from manufacturers. Format for references Please use the Harvard reference system. Citations within the Submission guidelines text for a single author reference should include the author sur- Authors are responsible for all statements made in their work, name and year of publication; for a citation with two authors including changes made by the editor, authorised by the submit- include both author surnames and year of publication; for more ting author. The text should be provided as a word document than two authors, include the first author surname followed by via e-mail to editorial@ imagingmanagement.org. Please provide “et al.” and the year of publication. Multiple citations should be a contact e-mail address for correspondence. Following review, separated by a semicolon, and listed in alphabetical order. Ex- a revised version, which includes editor’s comments, is returned ample of within text citation: (Marolt 2008; Marolt and Gleeson to the author for authorisation. Articles may be a maximum 700 2002; Miller et al. 2003). words per published page, but may include up to 1,500 words in total. The format for listing references in submitted articles should fol- low the Harvard reference system. Example of standard journal reference: Sydow Campbell, K. (1999) “Collecting information; Structure qualitative research methods for solving workplace problems”, Article texts must contain: Technical communication, 46 (4) 532-544. Readers will be pro- • names of authors with abbreviations for the highest vided with an e-mail contact for references, which will be kept academic degree; on file and supplied on request. Authors are responsible for the • affiliation: department and institution, city and country; accuracy of the references they cite. • main authors are requested to supply a portrait photo (see specifications below); • one contact name for correspondence and an e-mail address Acceptance which may be published with the article; It is at the discretion of our editorial board to accept or refuse • acknowledgements of any connections with a company submissions. We will respond to submissions within four weeks or financial sponsor; of receipt. We reserve the right to revise the article or request • authors are encouraged to include checklists, tables and/or the author to edit the contents, and to publish all texts in any guidelines, which summarise findings or recommendations; EMC Consulting Group journal or related website, and to list • references or sources, if appropriate, as specified below. them in online literature databases.

For further details or to request a copy of the 2008 editorial Images planner, with topics and focus areas included, please email Main authors are invited to supply a portrait photo for publica- [email protected]. tion with their article, as well as other images and visuals. This and any other relevant images for publication with an article Thank you, should be sent by e-mail as separate files (only high resolution The IMAGING Management Editorial Team

38 COUNTRY FOCUS: Austria

Management Challenges for

Medical Imaging in Austria Author Prof. Werner Jaschke Chairman The Chairman’s Perspective Department of Radiology Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck The radiology department at Innsbruck University Innsbruck, Austria Medical Centre has two divisions located in two differ- werner.jaschke@ i-med.ac.at ent buildings, staffed by 66 physicians, approximately 200 technicians and 88 scientists. Our centre is a well- known leader in fields such as interventional radiology, particularly in the treatment of aortic aneurysms and intracranial aneurysms. Our team have also devel- oped research in areas such as ultrasound-guided biopsies of the prostate, stereotactic treatment of an ongoing basis, and relate this to the liver tumours, stereotaxy (http://sip.uki.at), CT-guided cost of exams and the income generated biopsies of lung nodules and ultrasound imaging and by them. guided therapies of the musculoskeletal and periph- eral nervous system The hospital administration keeps track of the costs per procedure or exam per- formed. Therefore, if you request new PACS has been one of the main catalysts for change in equipment they can calculate not only the cost of the the profession of medical imaging, and Austria is no dif- investment but also the running costs such as the staff, ferent in this. We first established a government-spon- materials and accessories that will be required to run it. sored teleradiology service in Austria as a pilot project These running costs are an important factor in estimat- called “Telemedicine Tirol”, following what constituted ing whether an investment is realistic or not. the first hospital-wide PACS at a university hospital in Austria, and one of the largest PACS installations in Patient Access a Priority Europe. Remote consultations are now provided to five There are no waiting lists for medical imaging in Austria, local hospitals. On a daily basis, this adds between 2 – and patient access to treatment is very good. Productiv- 5 % to our overall workload. However, the advent of ity is higher due to greater incentives for doctors. They teleradiology has also given rise to certain operational earn a fixed income, plus extra income from patients challenges. with additional private healthcare coverage. Therefore, by doing more, doctors earn more. Due to local laws, services are preferentially provided on a local basis and we provide only emergency services Also in Austria, public hospitals operate on a traditional and second opinions. Our decision to cut back on our hierarchical structure which, in my opinion, adds to teleradiology operations with outside partners was based productivity. For example, Chairpersons here are in on poor reimbursement levels. The remaining services a position to delegate more responsibility to up-and- are run more as a courtesy to the smaller institutions coming colleagues, fostering their careers with an and whose specialists might not cover the sorts of cases they eventually developing their roles to positions of leader- receive than as a profit-making project. ship. The general trend is that these individuals, after tens years experience in a bigger hospital can go into Productivity Monitoring Key private practice or can take a top position in a large ra- to Good Management diology department. Productivity is becoming increasingly important for good management. We have a fixed annual budget and Skepticism About Accreditation in Austria therefore although there are no penalties in place, if re- In Austria, there are laws as in other European coun- sources are not allocated properly, we may have to cut tries, obliging medical institutions to comply with in- necessary costs. In parallel, if we perform well, the next dustrial ISO 9001 standards. Each two years we have to year’s budget will increase. Therefore, our department undergo re-accreditation processes to ensure we are up- operates continuous productivity monitoring and train- to-date. However, these are not specifically designed for ing of staff members. We calculate the output of the healthcare institutions, and therefore their true impact department and the numbers of exams performed on on quality management is limited. As a result, accredi-

39 COUNTRY FOCUS: Austria

tation is not viewed in a positive light; as well as being that are experts in organisational change management labour and time-intensive, the question remains of who to oversee the project and to deal with staff concerns. will foot the bill. Also, as the reimbursement levels re- main the same whether you undergo accreditation or Paring down our team may be problematic. We are a not, there is a low incentive to get involved. public institution, and in Austria, if a public sector work- er is on a permanent contract then they have a job for life The results of these procedures are not made public and it is not possible to make them redundant. Therefore like in the US, which is directed towards patients as we won’t replace staff that leave. In the University, they consumers with a right to survey the results of insti- get around this by only hiring on a contract basis since tutions, but only used internally. Another negative 2002. But the hospital administration have a different aspect of accreditation is that it does not measure or system – they hire doctors for an initial six years, then regulate the quality of the output of the department. allow them two following years to be monitored. If they Even if the results of the ISO process are that the re- are hired again after this then it is a given that they also porting process is satisfactory, it makes no comment have a job for life. It allows those responsible to be sure on the effectiveness of the report for the patient, or they are making the right employment decision. whether the referring physician was correct to order that specific exam. Therefore it has limited impact on Management Training improving medical quality. Management training is more of a concern in Austria for those interested in developing long-term career Restructuring the Radiology Department goals. If you are going to become a permanent mem- In early 2007 the hospital administration, the univer- ber of staff then taking courses on leadership, people sity and myself, initiated a restructuring project for the skills and administration is a necessary addition to one’s department of radiology, to cut superfluous processes education. Otherwise all hospital staff receive a week- and related costs and to increase efficiency and medical long crash course in the basics of healthcare manage- quality. By eliminating parallel structures, we will offer ment including an overview of the administrative and a more streamlined service, but quality need not suffer. organisational structure of the hospital. If people want It will take an estimated two years to achieve these goals, to go further than this they have the option of following and we may have to lose technical and administrative part-time courses in management with private trainers staff along the way. We have a two-man coaching team for up to one year. ❉

Profile of the Austrian Society of Radiological Technologists Interviewee Dr. Michaela Rosenblattl Interview with Society President, Dr Michaela Rosenblattl President Verband der Radiologie- technologinnen Österreichs Please tell us a little bit about the history of your body of paramedical professionals (Medical Techno- (Austrian Society of Radio- Society and how it has evolved since it was founded. logical Society of Austria). logical Technologists) Vienna, Austria Founded in 1961, the Austrian Society of Radiological praesident@radiologietech- Technologists is now about 48 years old. During this Please tell us a little about its main activities. nologen-austria.at time, the Society was involved in the process of estab- One of our main activities is to develop and promote lishing rules and laws for the profession of radiological the professional qualifications and occupational charac- technology. At the beginning, we were quite a small or- teristics of radiologic technologists. ganisation with only about 70 members while presently, we have nearly 800. We also organise an annual congress and offer a plat- form for the posting of jobs for radiologic technologists. We are now also a registered state organisation in Aus- These services are much appreciated by our members tria. The Society is governed by the ministry of health, and help us to network. We also issue a number of dif- the national medical association, and the governing ferent publications and newsletters during the year.

40 IMAGING Management COUNTRY FOCUS: Austria

What are the main challenges facing radiologic tech- interventional radiology, radio-oncology and nuclear nicians in Austria and how does your Society help to medicine which are consolidated under a single theme. address them? Education of radiologic technologists is housed in the The role of radiologic technicians is growing and chang- University of Applied Science where trainees may attain ing in Austria - the profession has expanded and now a bachelor degree of science in health studies. The study includes roles in application of contrast media, as free- programmes include diagnostic imaging and interven- lance worker, agent of radioprotection, network agent tional radiology, radio-oncology and nuclear medicine. in radiology and teleradiology, though it does not yet include reporting. Is your Society active in the field of educating its members? How is this achieved? We are also focusing on future changes we would like to Yes - in 2005 the Society adopted the Continuing see happen to improve the working lives of our mem- Medical Education (CME) point system. We offer our bers. With this in mind, we have taken the decision to members the possibility to take part and thus generate establish a paramedic council to register professionals 150 points within three years. We also have partnership and to have more power of veto before nascent rules programmes for continuing education with medical so- pass through the legislative process, as well as to negoti- cieties and companies. ate for increased salaries. ❉

Does your Society host any kinds of events or con- gresses for its members? Each year during Spring, we organise a big congress that includes a variety of themes in diagnostic imaging and

Radiology Management in Austria Profile of the AKH Imaging Department

The history of the Vienna General Hospital goes back more Author than three hundred years. It came about as the result of Education in Radiology Prof. Dr. Anton the reconstruction of the “Home for the Poor and Invalid“, In Austria, the residency course Staudenherz which was founded by Emperor Leopold I in 1693 and was for radiology takes six years to Specialist in Internal & located from 1694 on the site between Alserstrasse, Spital- complete, of which 5 years are Nuclear Medicine University Clinic of Nuclear gasse and Garnisongasse. The home was partly opened in spent training in radiology, 1 Medicine 1695, and in 1696 it housed more than 1,000 poor people. year of which can then be spent Vienna University Hospital The Vienna General Hospital was officially opened on 7 in either the nuclear medicine (AKH) Vienna, Austria June, 1994. This is commemorated by a roll of honour at or radio-oncology departments. anton.staudenherz@ the entrance to the hospital with the names of the decision The 6th year must be split into meduniwien.ac.at makers: Franz Vranitzky, Erhard Busek, Helmut Zilk, Ferdi- 6 months between internal nand Lacina, Hans Mayr and Sepp Rieder. medicine, 3 months of which in surgery and 3 months where residents are free to choose from Vienna University Hospital (AKH) has now developed other specialties. At the end of the training there is a into one of the largest hospitals in Austria. It is a uni- board examination. versity hospital with 2,189 beds. There are two imaging departments - radiology and nuclear medicine. We per- In my own case, after finishing medical school 1993, form about 10,600 diagnostic procedures per annum. I began my residency in internal medicine at the Uni- We provide a thyroid outpatient clinic, a treatment ward versity Hospital of Vienna. After training in internal and a nuclear medicine imaging centre, including PET. medicine I started specialisation in nuclear medicine, Ours is a public institution. Reimbursement is provided finishing in 2002. Since 2003, I am an attending physi- for by both the city of Vienna and the federal budget. cian at the department of nuclear medicine. www.imagingmanagement.org 41 th German Congress COUNTRY FOCUS: Austria 89 of Radiology 5th Joint Congress of the DRG and the ÖRG April 30–Mai 3, 2008 congress presidents Prof. Dr. D. Vorwerk, Ingolstadt Prof. Dr. R. Fotter, Graz In my function as assistant medical director I have been congress venue organising the thyroid outpatients clinic from 2003 to Berlin, Messe-Süd (South Entrance) 2004, then the treatment ward until 2006. Since 2007, I am organising and working in the diagnostic imaging centre. My areas of interest are paediatric nuclear medi- cine and the evaluation and optimisation of processes as well as standardisation and SPECT-CT. I do a lot in ra- diation safety and clinical investigations, as well as basic science in medical physics.

Our imaging department offer patients conventional NM, SPECT-CT, PET and in the near future PET-CT (as well as PET-MRI, albeit for science and not as a mat- ter of routine). We are also involved in thyroid manage- ment and therapy.

Management Challenges In our department, there are waiting lists in the thyroid outpatient clinic and partly in the PET facility where � Paediatric Radiology these waiting lists sometimes pose a significant problem. � Interventional Radiology In the diagnostic imaging part of our department, which I am responsible for, our scheduling centre has been set � Neuroradiology up to provide ways to avoid the formation of significant � Mammography waiting lists. � Musculoskeletal We are proactive in avoiding turf battles and other con- � International Day flicts in the nuclear medicine department by encourag-

http://www.drg.de ing open communication as often as possible with the

� � Continuing Medical Education referring physicians. We also try to optimise and adapt � Research our services to the demand of the clinicians and to an- ticipate there needs. This sort of approach ensures that � Radiation Protection problems are less likely to develop. If you know what � Panel Discussions they want and they know what you are able to deliver then it should work without major conflicts.

In terms of career development, the higher you rise in the hierarchy, the more you have to do troubleshoot- ing and management tasks. If you want to be good at your job, you have to take classes in management. While common sense might help you, in a today’s world it is more important to learn the tricks from experts who are specifically trained in economics. Deutsche Röntgengesellschaft e.V. Straße des 17. Juni 114 While I definitely enjoy the management part of my job, 10623 Berlin the problem is that I have to manage without optimal fi- Phone +49 (0)30 916070-0 Fax +49 (0)30 916070-22 nancial resources and the obligation to report to the head of the department can present obstacles, and while I am committed to the scientific part of my job, I can only Österreichische Röntgengesellschaft – ÖRG ❉ c/o Wiener Medizinische Akademie fulfil all these functions by eating into my spare time. Alser Straße 4 a-1090 Wien Phone +43 (0)14051383-21 42

Fax +43 (0)14051383-23 http://www.oerg.at continued from p. 23 current study and comparison studies, resulted in a speeding up of the production of an imaging report from an image study and related exams. UK RADIOLOGICAL

Good performances for PACS mean from the user CONGRESS 2008 perspective that a query against current exams should last less then five seconds, regardless of the acquisi- AN INVITATION FROM tion date, and the time for retrieving an exam should THE PRESIDENT remain in the order of the network transfer time. In Pisa radiology departments, radiologists have to I extend an invitation to attend the UK Radiological Congress 2008 which wait a very short time: for example to retrieve a CT is to be held in Birmingham, UK between 2-4th June 2008. There is of more then 500 images they need about 25 sec- a strong management theme running through the Congress which reflects current trends in the UK. Justifiably, the UK is proud ofits onds. Obviously, this performance time should re- progress with improvements in service delivery and the UK Radiologi- main stable in the long term and not degrade in a cal Congress represents the major UK forum for service delivery and significant way. management.

The department’s IT group developed sufficient com- Major themes in 2008 are workforce, delivery targets and service stan- petencies in hardware, systems and applications: all the dards. There is a fascinating session on “surviving as a future work- force”. It will feature a UK perspective with Professor Adrian Dixon from available internal knowledge was used to plan and im- Cambridge delivering a presentation with the challenging title “Radi- plement the system. Once the system was in produc- ologists: Will we need more or less?” A US perspective will be delivered tion, fast failure response times were controlled by the by Dr Giles Boland from Massachusetts. The UK workforce has done department’s IT group itself. They can promptly react much to look at skill mix and Mr Richard Evans from the Society of Ra- to malfunctioning, solve more than 95% of the prob- diographers asks the intriguing question “workforce planning: Whose lems and provide the best information for the most ef- problem?” fective intervention by the developer team. UKRC is pleased to announce that the Department of Health will be holding an Imaging Forum at UKRC. This will look at sustainability of The IT departmental group acts also as an interface current success of service delivery improvements and discuss future to users, physicians and other personnel, teaching developments. them how to use the system and helping in solving personal issues with it. High level support is the key The UK Royal College of Radiologists and College of Radiographers are developing a patient focused accreditation programme for the ac- to a good implementation of any technology in the creditation of radiology services. This innovative project will be pre- real world scenario. sented in detail at UKRC.

In two years, both radiology departments collected At UKRC 2008 there is a strong satellite programme delivered by in- 7TB of images and O3-DPACS was appreciated for dustry partners. There will be a wide variety of topics including “ambi- its stability, robustness, interoperability and reliabil- ent experience a new experience for patients” and “trauma imaging in the future using hybrid imaging systems”. ity. In the project development, we evaluate the scal- ability feature of the adopted PACS. An healthcare There will also be a strong digital, technology and clinical programme informatics system should implement solutions that which can be viewed with the rest of the programme at www.ukrc.org. could be applied to low load environments up to uk multicenter systems reaching also regional integration environments. This should foster vertical integration I look forward to meeting you at the UK Radiological Congress 2008 and reduce costs. We observe also the economicity of using an open source PACS: an healthcare informa- tive system should not require high investments if not necessary and should try to guarantee the greater reli- Stephen G Davies ability at the lowest cost. ❉ UK Radiological Congress President [email protected]

43 Imaging Leaders

Interview with Dr. Marco Rosselli Del Turco

Interviewee Dr. Marco Rosselli Del Turco Why did you decide to focus your career on How is EUSOMA active in the definition and President breast cancer imaging? dissemination of quality standards for audit and European Society of Breast Cancer My participation in the student’s political accreditation of breast units? Specialists (EUSOMA) Florence, Italy movements at the time of my degree in medi- The primary aim of EUSOMA is to harmonise at [email protected] cine, inspired me to seek a new approach to a high level, the quality of breast cancer care in Eu- medicine. Thus, I decided to dedicate my pro- rope, drawing up guidelines on the different aspects fessional activity to prevention and I decided of its care. One of the essential requirements for to apply for a job at a new centre for preven- providing the best care to women is to guarantee tion of social diseases, just built in Florence. they are treated in dedicated breast units. Therefore At that time the preliminary results of the EUSOMA has written guidelines on the require- Health Insurance Plan conducted by Dr. Phil- ments of a specialist breast unit and based on this ip Strax in New York, who had a very nice of- has defined a voluntary certification process, in fice on 5th Avenue, were very promising and order to foster their implementation and develop- our group decided to start the first European ment. This is an increasing activity for the society; population-based screening programme in 25 the number of units requesting to be certified is municipalities in the outskirts of Florence. growing, as not only health professionals are eager to demonstrate they are working according to Euro- How did you come to be elected to President pean standards in a multidisciplinary way, but also of the European Society of Breast Cancer Spe- patients are aware about the importance of this and cialists (EUSOMA)? look for centres responding to well-defined criteria. Since 2003, I have been member of the Execu- tive Committee and following last year’s election What are the remaining challenges for a Europe- I had the honour to be appointed President. I’ve an standardised breast unit accreditation system? been collaborating within European groups for The big challenge is to prove that quality can breast cancer screening and with EUSOMA for only improve if you employ dedicated personnel, a long time; as experts in radiology, our main task if doctors, nurses, radiographers and clerical staff is to improve quality in mammography. I have are able to share their experience with the other been invited to participate in different EUSO- colleagues involved in the same professional field, MA workshops for the preparation of European independently from their original specialty. Guidelines. This is an opportunity to collaborate with other European experts and increase my What is the ‘gold standard’ that a breast unit commitment to contributing to improvements in must achieve? breast cancer care, developing projects on train- The mandatory requirements for a breast unit are ing for young health professionals, preparing a core team of specialised health professionals, who guidelines on urgent issues such as the definition offer a high standard care with a multidisciplinary of quality indicators for breast cancer care, the approach; a sufficient number of cases to allow ef- use of MRI in breast cancer clinical diagnosis and fective working and expertise; data collection and the optimal organisation of a breast unit, etc. continued on p. 45

44 How To...

How to... Increase Workstation Productivity

For a number of years we worked on customisation, and many workstation de- Author the topic of optimising softcopy display, velopers incorporate customisability into Prof. Elizabeth Krupinksi analysing the influence of display proper- their products. Research Professor ties such as luminance, calibration method, Dept. Radiology Research University of Arizona noise compensation etc., on the diagnostic Another key factor that has not been well Arizona, US performance of radiologists. We still carry studied to date is the nature of the input [email protected] out those types of studies now, but the fo- device. Most radiologists are using the In my work, my general area of inter- cus has shifted slightly to include measures mouse (buttons and/or scroll wheel), hot est is in medical image perception and of efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. keys, a joystick or common modifica- decision making, how well radiologists tions of these devices. Some, like the basic interpret images and what factors For example, we examine the types of dis- mouse, are rather inflexible and awkward contribute to better decision-making play parameters already noted, but include to use. They can and do slow down the strategies. A key component in the measures of timing such as total viewing image interpretation process, especially imaging chain is the display, or the time per image. We also record eye posi- when scrolling through stacks of hundreds point at which the image meets the tion in many studies to determine how ef- to thousands of images. They can also lead eye-brain system of the radiologist. ficiently the radiologist scans the image or to repetitive use injuries. More research in In the early days of digital radiol- ogy, the question was quite basic: can collects and processes the information in general needs to be on finding innovative radiologists attain the same level of the image in order to render a diagnostic ways to interact with image data. accuracy with digital softcopy displays decision. We have found in a number of compared to traditional film? Once it studies that optimised displays not only Increasing Image Volume Impacts was clear that the answer was yes, the tend to yield higher diagnostic accuracy Workers’ Health question became how can we optimise but they also tend to improve interpreta- It is not just radiology that is feeling the softcopy display. This, and other factors tion efficiency. Radiologists tend to fix- impact of the increasing volume of data for good workstation use, are the focus ate the lesions earlier in the search and from studies. Pathology is starting their of this article. tend to need less time to distinguish them own digital revolution with virtual slides from the background and render the cor- (digitised glass specimen slides) and rect decision. these images are as large and even larger than radiology images. Many depart- What Factors Improve Productivity? ments are utilising more image data of As already noted, optimising the display is all sorts in routine patient care and more one major factor influencing productivity. and more clinicians are using worksta- Additionally, the layout of the images and tions for various interpretation tasks. the user tools within the display(s) is quite Studies that I am carrying out now with important. In one study recording eye po- Kevin Berbaum, PhD at the University sition, we found that readers were spend- of Iowa, are looking at one aspect of the ing about 20% of their search time focus- increasing image volume on radiologists’ ing on the menu and tools rather than the health and satisfaction. image itself. The image “hanging protocol” and the tool/menu layout does influence Specifically, we are examining the effects productivity. For many people that means of visual strain and fatigue on observer www.imagingmanagement.org 45 How To... performance. Initial surveys found that Ensuring Worker Health digital reading environment will reduce radiologists were experiencing more and is Protected distractions, improve reader comfort and more visual strain, blurred vision, double Repetitive stress injuries are common from reduce the amount of time it takes to ef- vision, headaches, and shoulder/back pain use of improper input devices (mouse, no ficiently gather and cognitively process the compared to viewing images in the tradi- pad etc.) and shoulder, neck and back prob- information in the displayed images. If all tional film environment. Using a device lems are quite common too from poor selec- of this is accounted for, then there is the to measure visual accommodation or how tion of chairs, monitors at the wrong height, potential to reduce reading errors. well the radiologist can focus their gaze on etc. As already noted, eye strain and visual a point in space (e.g., a fracture on a bone fatigue seem to be more common than one User group meetings, inter-departmental image) we are trying to quantify the effects would think. The only way to avoid these committees, planning groups for reading of long hours of reading on a digital dis- problems is to become familiar with ergo- room design, etc. are all useful in the good play on diagnostic accuracy. So far we have nomic guidelines for reading room design deployment of in-house workstations. found that the ability to accommodate as outlined in the ACR digital radiology The more input someone gets from the does indeed decrease at the end of the day guidelines, read OSHA recommendations eventual users, the more likely it is that (after long reading hours) compared to the for computer use in general, and to just use the adopted solution will work and be ac- beginning of the workday. common sense. If you are uncomfortable or ceptable. It simply may not be possible to feeling pain, then there is clearly a problem please everyone with a single choice. Does IT Offer a Solution? and unfortunately it is probably almost al- More computer-aided detection tools are ways up to the individual to do something Interoperability, flexible licensing, add- being developed for a wide variety of lesions about it and change their working environ- ons, service agreements, etc., are fairly and modalities. The next big step will be ment as best they can. standard and obviously should be re- getting FDA approval for computer tools quested from vendors when choosing that also provide an estimate or probability Additionally it is useful to be aware of the workstations. Another important thing of malignancy for such things as mammo- signs of fatigue - if your eyesight starts to get to ask for may be how willing the ven- graphic, colon and lung lesions. The key blurry or your eyes feel dry, then stop for a dor is to customise the display for your in both cases is to maximise sensitivity and few minutes, look away at a distant target institution or even an individual user. In specificity so the radiologist has sufficient from the computer monitor and just rest the past this has not even been a real con- confidence in the computer’s decisions. An- your eyes for a few minutes. It is probably sideration, but as software becomes more other aid is the development of 3D images also a good idea for radiologists to get their powerful and flexible, we may see work- either by tomography or through produc- eyes checked on a regular basis. Reading at stations that actually adapt to the user. tion of stereo images and displays. David such a close distance for hours on end can The longer an individual uses a worksta- Getty, PhD from BBN Technologies has actually induce myopia. Corrective lenses tion, the workstation can learn the user shown amazing improvements in the detec- (special computer glasses) may be required preferences, style and so on and adapt to tion and classification of mammographic for more people and at younger ages than that particular user. When someone else lesions with stereo images. Further investi- with traditional film reading. logs in, the computer recognises the new gation with these types of techniques with user and brings up the configuration it careful attention to both diagnostic accu- Factors for Success has learned for that user instead of the racy and interpretation times will be needed Good workstation design and attention one for the previous user. This possibility to really determine their true worth. to ergonomic details when designing the is not that far in the future. ❉ continued from p. 44 audit; providing all services from genetics agnosis. The challenge of research in this already the standard for specialist breast and prevention to treatment of primary field is to better understand which cancers cancer centres. A multidisciplinary meet- tumours and care of advanced disease and progress rapidly and need to be treated at a ing should be regularly organised once a finally, patient support. very early stage. week with the attendance of specialists in the different disciplines. Also, to avoid er- What do we know today that has made What is your best advice for other rors, they should measure the interval can- the biggest impact on survival rates? managers in breast units? cer rate, the rate of advanced cancer and We now know that the detectable preclini- To employ dedicated personnel, to main- the proportion of cancers under 1cm of cal phase of breast cancer is even longer tain recall rates within 3 - 5%, and to im- diameter. If these measures are not at an than originally thought, and that new plement digital mammography whenever acceptable level, an accurate training pro- technologies can further advance time of possible. Multidisciplinary teams in breast gramme should be implemented and ex- diagnosis, although we risk some over-di- units are essential, and triple assessment is ternal advice should be considered. ❉

46

AGENDA Key Seminars & Conferences IMAGING Management 28/7, rue de la Loi B-1040 Bruxelles, Belgium T: +32/2/ 286 85 00 F: +32/2/ 286 85 08 www.imagingmanagement.org April 2008 4 – 6 67th International Meeting of the Japan 5 – 9 8th Asia Pacific Congress of Cardiovascular Radiological Society & Interventional Radiology Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Publisher Yokohama, Japan Christian Marolt www.secretariat.ne.jp/jrs67/english/ www.apccvir.org 10 – 13 European Society of Gastrointestinal and [email protected] invitation_eng.html 7 – 11 IHE Connectathon Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) 2008 Annual Meeting and Postgraduate Course Oxford, UK Managing Editor www.ihe-europe.org Istanbul, Turkey www.esgar.org Dervla Gleeson 7 – 8 Annual Meeting of the National Council on [email protected] Radiation Protection & Measurements 14 – 18 Society of Nuclear Medicine, Arlington, US 25th Annual Meeting Honolulu, US www.ncrp.com International Editor 9 – 10 European Conference on Embolotherapy www.snm.org 25 – 28 CAD – 10th International Workshop on CAD Edward Susman Florence, Italy [email protected] www.et2008.org Barcelona, Spain 10 – 12 ESGAR Hands-on Workshop on www.cars-international.org 25 – 28 EuroPACS Annual Congress CT-Colonography Editors Vigo, Spain Barcelona, Spain www.europacs.org Caroline Hommez www.esgar.org Sherry Scharff 11 – 13 Internationaler Fortbildungskurs Moderne 25 – 28 CARS Annual Congress Mammodiagnostik und Therapie Barcelona, Spain www.cars-international.org Erlangen, Germany Global Communications www.comed-kongresse.de Dr. Don I. Idrees 12 – 15 30th Charing Cross International Symposium [email protected] London, UK www.cxsymposium.com July 2008 13 – 18 108th Annual Meeting of the American Journal Management Roentgen Ray Society 20 – 23 9th International Workshop on Digital Mammography Katya Mitreva Washington, DC, US [email protected] www.arrs.org Tucson, Arizona 23 – 26 International Society for Radiographers and http://iwdm2008.org/ Radiological Technologists (ISRRT) 15th World Congress Creative Director Durban, South Africa Astrid Mentzik www.isrrt.org 30 – 03 89th German Radiology Congress September 2008 Berlin, Germany 5 – 9 MRI Update in Neurological www.roentgenkongress.de & Orthopaedic Imaging Oostende, Belgium Subscription Rates (5 Issues / Year) www.oostende-mri-congress.be One year Europe 85 euros 11 – 13 9th ESGAR Hands-on Workshop on Overseas 105 euros CT-Colonography Two years Europe 150 euros June 2008 Berlin, Germany Overseas 180 euros 4 – 7 31st Postgraduate Course www.esgar.org Production and Printing & 45th Meeting of the ESPR 11 – 14 ESUR 2008 Print run: 13,000 Edinburgh, UK Munich, Germany ISSN = 1377-7629 www.espr.org www.esur.org 13 – 17 CIRSE Annual Congress 5 – 8 25th International Congress © Imaging Management is published five times per year. of Radiology (ICR) Copenhagen, Denmark The publisher is to be notified of cancellations six weeks Marrakesh, Morocco www.cirse.org before the end of the subscription. The reproduction of www.icr2008.org 18 – 21 European Society of Neuroradiology (parts of) articles is prohibited without the consent of Congress the publisher. The publisher does not accept liability for Krakow, Poland unsolicited material. The publisher retains the right to republish all contributions and submitted materials via www.esnr.org the Internet and other media.

Legal disclaimer The Publishers, Editor-in-Chief, Editorial Board, Cor- respondents and Editors make every effort to ensure that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinion or state- ment appears in this publication. All data and opinions In the next issue... appearing in the articles and advertisements herein are the sole responsibility of the contributor or advertiser 4The Future of Imaging Education concerned. Therefore the Publishers, Editor-in-Chief, Editorial Board, Correspondents and Editors and their respective employees accept no liability whatsoever for 4 DICOM Toolkits for Cost-Effectiveness the consequences of any such inaccurate of misleading data, opinion or statement.

4 Clinical Leadership in Imaging Verified Circulation according to the standards of International Business 4 Procedure Coding Press Audits

IMAGING Management is 4 Medical Imaging in Belgium independently audited by Accountskantoor Closset on behalf of MIR

48 Issue 1 Out Now!

Cardiology Management is the only hard-copy journal focusing on best practice in management in cardiology departments across the world. Distributed four times per year, this journal is tailored to meet your informa- tion needs on the latest best practices in management topics, such as staff, financial and IT-related manage- ment issues.

Issue 1, now available, includes the following articles:

Cover Story – Guidelines and their Implementation • Are ESC Syncope Guidelines Being Implemented in Europe? • Heart Failure Guidelines • Overcoming Guideline Implementation Challenges in Europe

Features • Evaluating Heart Disease: The Role of Cardiac Imaging

Technology Management • IHE Cardiology Technical Committee: Achieve Systems Integration • Report on Remote Monitoring for Cardiology • Market Overview of Cardiology PACS Devices • Mechanical Circulatory Support: New Generation Devices Mark a New Era

Call for Abstracts! Call for Abstracts! Call for Abstracts! Call for Abstracts! Call for Abstracts! Call fo

Please submit all management-related abstracts to Managing Editor Dervla Gleeson at [email protected]. A full list of desired topics is available from our website. Visit us at www.cardiologymanagement.eu Promoting Management and Leadership Canon DR: Nothing compares in Medical Imaging Volume 8 Issue 2 / 2008 April - June Canon DR: Easy as child’s play ISSN = 1377-7629 Unrivalled portability, ultra easy operation, optimal image quality, immediate results ...... the benefits of Canon DR anywhere are unlimited. Maximum efficiency is achieved through a minimum x-ray dose. Only Canon, the inventor of portable Digital Radiography, can offer six years of experience and expertise in the market. See for yourself: Nothing compares. Radiology • Cardiology • Intervention • surgery • it • Management • Europe • Economy • Trends • Technology

Streamlining Emergency Radiology Services

Open Source PACS Maximising Workstation The A - Z of Cost- Decreases Costs Productivity Effectiveness Analysis See it in action now at the ECR 2008 Booth number 105/EXPO A www.canon-europe.com/medical [email protected]