DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on the FEMM Committee Delegation Visit to European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), Vilnius, 19-20 May 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on the FEMM Committee Delegation Visit to European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), Vilnius, 19-20 May 2011 Directorate-General for Internal Policies Directorate C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality Brussels, 1 June 2011 Report on the FEMM Committee delegation visit to European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), Vilnius, 19-20 May 2011 COMPOSITION Edit BAUER (EPP, Slovakia), Chair of the FEMM delegation Marc TARABELLA (S&D, Belgium) Members were accompanied by Sabina Magnano and Malgosia Szlendak from the committee secretariat and Valborg Linden-Jonsten (S&D group advisor). CONTEXT AND PURPOSE This was the first visit of a FEMM delegation to EIGE since its establishment in 2009. The aim of the visit was to gather first hand information about the current and forthcoming activities of EIGE and to discuss how to organise exchange of information between EIGE and the FEMM Committee and the framework for possible cooperation. The programme of the visit is attached in Annex 1. MAIN ISSUES RAISED Current areas of work (a list of ongoing studies is attached in Annex 2a): o Beijing indicators in the form of reports to be submitted to the Presidencies (reconciliation of family and professional life for the Polish Presidency; women and environment for the Danish Presidency); o Gender Equality Index o Men and masculinity o Gender Stereotypes o Gender mainstreaming o Violence against women Establishment plan (organisation chart is attached as Annex 2b) o Currently 39 staff (including contract agents and seconded national experts) are employed by EIGE. 94% of the recruitment foreseen for 2010 was completed. o It is planned that in 2011 the staff will increase to 45 Budget o There was a surplus in budget in 2010 since not all activities could start as planned. As a consequence operational budget for 2012 is lower and will be compensated by this surplus. o As for administrative expenses, the rent of the premises (until 15/12/2011 paid by Lithuanian government) shall now also be added, which entails a 15% increase in the budget. o If it is decided that EIGE takes on tasks in relation to violence against women, which was not foreseen in the initial regulations, additional staff will be needed. Premises o The EP and the Commission are looking for joint EU premises in Vilnius. EIGE would also like to join them. Accordingly, a letter was addressed by EIGE Director to the EP DG in charge of Infrastructures and Logistics (see Annex 2c). The support of the FEMM Committee to this request (through a letter from the Chair to the responsible DG) would be very much welcomed by EIGE. Exchange of information about EIGE and FEMM Committee A better exchange of information and cooperation should be organised between EIGE and the FEMM Committee and in particular: o Information from EIGE on studies: . as soon as agreed by Management Board (main objectives and timeframe); . when they are finalised (short summary of study and possibly presentation of study in FEMM Committee if relevant for committee work); o Transmission to FEMM of EIGE quarterly report to its Management Board as soon as available; o Transmission to FEMM of EIGE annual report as soon as available; o Information to FEMM on experts appointed by FEMM Committee as members of Forum of experts; o Transmission to EIGE of FEMM annual work programme as soon as adopted by FEMM coordinators; o Invitation every year in January/February to the EIGE's Director, Ms Langbakk, to present the Institute's annual work programme and evaluate the activities of the previous year before the FEMM Committee; o Informal input on EIGE mid-term work plan. Following a discussion in the FEMM Committee in January/February 2012, the coordinators could discuss the issue. This input could take the form of a letter sent by the Chair on the basis of the discussion by the coordinators; o Prompt information from EIGE on possible budget and staffing problems; o Information to FEMM regarding detailed establishment plan including team members' responsibilities. FOLLOW-UP At their meeting of 25 May 2011, the FEMM coordinators mandated the Chair to write to the EIGE Director proposing some concrete follow-up in particular as concerns better sharing of information. The coordinators also mandated the Chair to write to the DG for Infrastructure and Logistics supporting EIGE request for joint EU premises in Vilnius. Directorate-General for Internal Policies Directorate C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality 12 May 2011 Delegation to Vilnius, Lithuania 19-20 May 2011 Programme Individual arrival to Vilnius on 19 May 2011. Artis Centum Hotel, Liejyklos st 11/23, 01120 Vilnius, Lithuania Tel:+370 5 2660366, Fax: +370 5 2660377 Email:[email protected] Thursday, 19 May 2011 15.30 Arrival of the delegation at EIGE’s premises, Švitrigailos g. 11M, LT-03228 Vilnius,, tel: +370 5 239 4140 16.00 – 16.30 Opening of the meeting . Virginija Langbakk, Director of EIGE, . Edit Bauer, MEP Chair of FEMM Committee Delegation 16.30-17.30 Session I – EIGE- state of play - Presentation and discussion of the state of play of the European Institute for Gender Equality 17.30-18.30 Session II – EIGE’s main activities planned and future challenges - Discussion on the current and future challenges of the European Institute for Gender Equality, activities during 2011, 2012 and possible coordination of future cooperation with FEMM committee and the European Parliament - EIGE’s focal areas of intervention, and planned studies - Specific areas: GBV, stereotypes, etc 19.45 Pick up at hotel 20.00 – 22.00 Dinner hosted by Director Friday, 20 May 2011 09.30 Arrival at EIGE’s premises Session III – Planning some of the future joint events - EIGE`s cooperation with FEMM committee and the European Parliament in 2011 and 2012 - Exchange of views on EIGE`s second Mid-Term Programme 2013-2015 - Discussion and Conclusions 12.00 End of visit Individual departure from Vilnius List Of Studies Launched by EIGE Study for the review of developments at the level of the EU and the Member States in implementing the Beijing Platform for Action in the Area F: Women and the Economy. (launched 2010) Study on existing indicators and statistics on gender equality in the European Unijon. (launched 2010) Study on implementation methods of work with the Beijing indicators in the European Unijon. (launched 2010) Study on gender stereotypes. (launched 2010) Background study on men's involvement in gender equality within EIGE's working areas. (launched 2010) Study for the further development of a European Union Gender Equality Index. (2010) Study to identify and map existing data, statistics and resources on sexual violence against women in the European Union. (launched 2010) Study: Area K of the Beijing Platform for Action: Women and the Environment in the European Unijon. (launched 2011) Background Paper on Practical Use of the Concept of Intersectionality for Advancing Gender Equality by the EU Institutions and the Member States. (launched 2010) Background Paper on Practical Use of Gender Training as a Tool for Gender Mainstreaming by the EU Institutions and Member States. (launched 2010) Background Paper on Good Practices in the Implementation of Gender Mainstreaming within European Structural Funds. (launched 2010) Study on the use of "good practice" as a tool for mainstreaming gender into the policies and programmes of the institutions of European Union and EU Member States. (launched 2010) Second Ex‐ante Evaluation of EIGE Focusing on the Institute's Specific Objectives and Operations. (launched 2010) Study for Mapping Stakeholders and Actors at European level and Accession Countries in relation to gender equality work: Mapping their interests and needs, as well as those from individual stakeholders. (launched 2010) Feasibility study on effective forms of electronic networks. (launched 2010) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 20130626 Prime Minister Letter USTR
    H.E. Petr Ne čas Prime Minister of the Czech Republic Úřad vlády České republiky náb ř. Edvarda Beneše 4 118 01 Praha 1 e-mail: [email protected] Brussels, 24 April 2013 Dear Prime Minister Ne čas, It is with great alarm that we are following the situation in the Czech Republic, where incomprehensible developments are taking place related to the outstanding Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes and its subordinate, the Security Services Archive. In only 5 years of their existence, both institutions have gained impressive international recognition for their pioneering work and high standards both on the domestic and European level - as frontrunners among similar institutions working on coming to terms with the terrible legacy of totalitarianism in Europe. The Institutions have earned their international reputation for producing high quality publications, exhibitions and for organizing high profile conferences. The access provided to the files of the former totalitarian secret services is the most liberal worldwide and the digitalization of archival documents proceeds at an unsurpassed speed. Moreover, the Institute has been the promoter of a unique process of uniting over twenty partner institutions from 13 EU Member States in the Platform of European Memory and Conscience, which was endorsed by an overwhelming majority of the European Parliament in its Resolution on European Conscience and Totalitarianism of 2 April 2009 as well as by the EU Council in 2009 and 2011 and the European Commission in 2010. We have stood in close and mutually enriching cooperation with the Institute for the past five years. We have now learned that, on 10 April 2013, the newly elected Institute Council dismissed acting Director Daniel Herman from office in the middle of his five-year term and that the entire 15-member Scientific Council of the Institute, consisting of domestic and international academic experts, resigned within two days thereupon.
    [Show full text]
  • Europa-Union Deutschland in Cooperation with Centre International De Formation Européenne
    Europa-Union Deutschland in cooperation with Centre International de Formation Européenne Together in Europe 2004 30th September – 3rd October 2004 Bratislava, Slovakia Europa-Union Deutschland invites you for the fourth time running to the border crossing activity „Together in Europe”. With this activity we want to set a clear signal for democracy and federalism in Europe and stimulate the commitment of its citizens for a united Europe. The discussion with our partners in the EU will include the future of Europe and the ways towards it, as well as possibilities to build up and strengthen the network of pro-european organizations. Draft Programme (31 August 2004) Thursday, 30th September 2004 15:00 – 18:00 h Registration in Hotel Danube 18:00 h Dinner in Hotel Danube 20:00 h Bratislava – Danube metropolis and capital in Europe Reception in the City Hall presented by Andrej Ďurkovsky, Major of Bratislava* Friday, 1st October 2004 8:00 h Breakfast 9:00 h "Together in Europe - Slovakia as a new partner in the EU" Panel discussion with members of the National Council of the Slovak Republic in the parliament building afterwards Lunch break (individually) 14:00 h „Europe on the move: The integration proceeds“ International forum in Hotel Danube with Pál Csáki, Deputy Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic for the European Integration, Human Rights and Minorities Chair: RA Ernst Johansson, Vicepresident of the Europa-Union Deutschland 15:45 – 16:15 h Coffee break 16:15 h "The nEUw members and us – manage challenges together" Panel discussion
    [Show full text]
  • Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action
    Ranking European Parliamentarians on Climate Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS With the European elections approaching, CAN The scores were based on the votes of all MEPs on Austria 2 Europe wanted to provide people with some these ten issues. For each vote, MEPs were either Belgium 3 background information on how Members of the given a point for voting positively (i.e. either ‘for’ Bulgaria 4 European Parliament (MEPs) and political parties or ‘against’, depending on if the text furthered or Cyprus 5 represented in the European Parliament – both hindered the development of climate and energy Czech Republic 6 national and Europe-wide – have supported or re- policies) or no points for any of the other voting Denmark 7 jected climate and energy policy development in behaviours (i.e. ‘against’, ‘abstain’, ‘absent’, ‘didn’t Estonia 8 the last five years. With this information in hand, vote’). Overall scores were assigned to each MEP Finland 9 European citizens now have the opportunity to act by averaging out their points. The same was done France 10 on their desire for increased climate action in the for the European Parliament’s political groups and Germany 12 upcoming election by voting for MEPs who sup- all national political parties represented at the Greece 14 ported stronger climate policies and are running European Parliament, based on the points of their Hungary 15 for re-election or by casting their votes for the respective MEPs. Finally, scores were grouped into Ireland 16 most supportive parties. CAN Europe’s European four bands that we named for ease of use: very Italy 17 Parliament scorecards provide a ranking of both good (75-100%), good (50-74%), bad (25-49%) Latvia 19 political parties and individual MEPs based on ten and very bad (0-24%).
    [Show full text]
  • Programme Progra
    program_v.qxd 21.11.2005 17:24 Page 6 Slovak National Centre Slovak National Centre for Human Rights for Human Rights CONFERENCE CONFERENCE on the occasion of the International Day of Human Rights on the occasion of the International Day of Human Rights ”Importance of Human Rights in Modern Society: ”Importance of Human Rights in Modern Society: Slovakia One Year after Entry into EU” Slovakia One Year after Entry into EU” Bratislava Bratislava Hotel Bôrik Hotel Bôrik 8 December 2005, Thursday 8 December 2005, Thursday 13.00 Registration of participants 13.00 Registration of participants 14.00 Opening of the conference 14.00 Opening of the conference Moderator: Gabriel Bianchi Moderator: Gabriel Bianchi Pál Csáky, Deputy Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic for European Affairs, Human Rights Pál Csáky, Deputy Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic for European Affairs, Human Rights and Minorities and Minorities Daniela Gemerská, Deputy Executive Director of the Slovak National Centre for Human Rights Daniela Gemerská, Deputy Executive Director of the Slovak National Centre for Human Rights Miroslav Kusý, Chairman of the Board of the Foundation for Tolerance and against Discrimination Miroslav Kusý, Chairman of the Board of the Foundation for Tolerance and against Discrimination 14.30 Parallel panel discussions 14.30 Parallel panel discussions ”Human rights education” ”Human rights education” Miroslav Kusý Miroslav Kusý Guests: Rumen Valchev, Burgas Free University, Bulgaria Guests: Rumen Valchev, Burgas Free University, Bulgaria Silvia
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Gender Budgeting Yolanda
    FEBRUARY 2010 Proposal made during the Spanish Presidency of the European Council Yolanda Jubeto Universidad del País Vasco. Spain Angela O’Hagan Glasgow Caledonian University. UK NIPO 800-10-037-5 GENDER BUDGETING PROPOSAL TO THE EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS ON THE ADDED VALUE OF INTRODUCING GENDER-BASED ANALYSIS IN THE BUDGETARY POLICY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES PRESENTATION This research is presented as a contribution of the Spanish Presidency of the European Union to increase and improve the state of the art on one of the issues whose importance is growing on the EU and its member States: the gender budget analysis. Gender budgeting is a strategic tool that provides the means for determining the effect of gov- ernment revenue and expenditure policies on women and men. It involves the examination of how budgetary allocations affect the economic and social opportunities of women and men. It represents a direct example of the mainstreaming principle, and involves an improvement in the quality and evaluation of the public policies. Since the concept appeared in the eighties of last century in Australia, different international or- ganizations have shown their interest in this issue: from the Beijing Platform for Action in United Nations, whose fifteenth anniversary has been celebrated during the Spanish Presidency, to the European Parliament Resolution on gender budgeting - building public budgets from a gender perspective (2002/2198(INI), following the Roadmap for Equality between women and men 2006-2010, the debate has been accompanied by reports and international conferences organized by the Council of Europe or the OECD.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tour of the European Electoral Campaigns in View of the European Elections (4Th-7Th June 2009)
    A tour of the European Electoral Campaigns in view of the European Elections (4th-7th June 2009) Author: Corinne Deloy, author of the European Elections Monitor (EEM) for the Robert Schuman Foundation and project manager at the Institute for Political Studies (Sciences Po). Germany Date of the election: 7th June (regional and local by-elections on the same day) Number of MEPs to be elected: 99 2009 is a super electoral year for the Germans, who within one year, will have to vote in general, regional, local, European and even the presidential elections (23rd May next by parliament). On 7th June, the day of the European election, local elections will also take place in the Länder of Bavaria, Saxony and Rhineland-Palatinate. 64 million Germans are being called to ballot including 4.3 million who will be voting for the first time. Turn out will be the greatest challenge to rise to as in all of the other European countries. According to a survey for the European institutions, only 44% of the Germans are aware that the European Parliament will be elected this year and 43% say they will go and vote. 31 political parties and associations are submitting themselves to the citizens’ judgment, a first in the country’s history. The most important of these groups are Die Linke (Left Party) whose list is being led by Lothar Bisky, the SPD (Social Democratic Party) led by Martin Schulz, chair of the European Socialists’ group in the European Parliament since 2004, die Grünen (the Greens) led by Rebecca Harms and Reinhard Bütighofer, the FDP (Liberal Democratic Party) led by young economist Silvana Koch-Mehrin, the CDU (Christian Democratic Union) led by present president of the European Parliament Hans- Gert Pöttering and the CSU (Social Christian Union) led by Martin Ferber.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Support
    Letter of Support The best policies for the integration of migrants are not an enigma. Migrants need opportunities to participate in the life of their country of residence fully, without fear of discrimination. They also need clear legal pathways to full national citizenship. As European populations become more diverse, each country needs to constantly re-think the meaning of citizenship to find new ways of living together in a welcoming society. Many of us have worked to translate these statements into a robust framework of high standards, developed through European cooperation on integration. Time and time again, our governments have committed us to put these principles into practice by raising the standards of our national laws and policies on migrant integration. Until now, however, it has been a challenge to monitor whether governments have been living up to these promises across Europe. The Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX) reveals the ‘good intentions gap’ between best practice and real policies by providing clear, concise and comparable data. We welcome MIPEX as a tool that brings the power of benchmarking to integration policy. We look forward to learning the 2006 results and launching a debate on integration policies across Europe, where myths are challenged with the facts and low expectations with high standards of best practice. Signatories International Jan Andersson, Member of the European Parliament, Chairman of Employment and Social Affairs Committee, Sweden Enrique Barón Crespo, Member of the European Parliament,
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the Management Board and Experts' Forum of the European
    Members of the Management Board and Experts’ Forum of the European Institute for Gender Equality May 2017 EUROPEAN INSTITUTE FOR GENDER EQUALITY Members of the Management Board and Experts’ Forum of the European Institute for Gender Equality The Management Board . 4 The Experts’ Forum . 6 Chair of the Management Board . 8 Chair of the Experts’ Forum . 9 European Commission . 10 Belgium . 12 Bulgaria . 16 The Czech Republic . 18 Denmark . 22 Germany . 26 Estonia . 30 Ireland . 32 Greece. 36 Members of the Management Board and Experts’ Forum of the European Institute Spain . 40 for Gender Equality (May 2017) France . 44 Croatia. 48 Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible Italy . 52 for any use that might be made of the following information. Cyprus. 56 Latvia . 60 Lithuania . 64 Luxembourg . 68 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers Hungary. 70 to your questions about the European Union. Malta . 74 New free phone number (*): The Netherlands . 76 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 Austria. 78 Poland. 80 *Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00800 numbers Portugal. 84 or may charge for these calls additionally. Romania. 88 Slovenia . 90 Slovakia . 94 Finland . 96 More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Sweden . 98 The United Kingdom . 102 © European Institute for Gender Equality, 2017 European Parliament nominations . 104 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. European Commission nominations . 107 Printed in Lithuania EU Level Workers’ Organisations – Experts’ Forum . 109 EU Level Non-Governmental Organisations – Experts’ Forum .
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Note of the Work of the Ep Members In
    Directorate-General for Internal Policies Directorate C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality 10/05/2011 Report on the FEMM Committee delegation visit to Budapest, Hungary, 16 - 18 March 2011 COMPOSITION Eva-Britt SVENSSON (GUE/NGL, Sweden), Chair of the FEMM Committee Lívia JÁRÓKA (EPP, Hungary), Vice-Chair of the FEMM Committee Edit BAUER (EPP, Slovakia) Zita GURMAI (S&D, Hungary) Ilda FIGUEIREDO (GUE/NGL, Portugal) Members were accompanied by Sabina Magnano and Zoltán Pethő from the committee secretariat, Ákos Madari (EP Office in Budapest) and Valborg Linden- Jonsten (S&D group advisor). PURPOSE The delegation visit took place in the context of the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union. The aim of the visit was to learn about gender equality policies in Hungary and exchange views about the implementation of the Presidency Programme in the field of gender equality. PRESS A Press Conference was held at the conclusion of the visit and a press statement was issued by the Committee Chair. MEETINGS (See full programme in enclosed Annex I) 17 March 2011 1. Minister of National Resources Mr Miklós Réthelyi, Minister of National Resources is responsible for a broad portfolio of policy areas, including gender equality. The meeting with the Minister - 1 - and further representatives of the Ministry covered gender equality issues on European level in the context of the Hungarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, as well as the domestic situation of gender policies. The Minister highlighted the following three gender issues which are dealt with during the Hungarian Presidency: The European Pact for gender equality for the period 2011 - 2020 was adopted as a result of the revision of the previous gender pact.
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation of the Ethnic Hungarian Minority in the Slovak Republic
    UNFULFILLED OBLIGATIONS: THE SITUATION OF THE ETHNIC HUNGARIAN MINORITY IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Geri L. Haight* I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 28 II. THE HUNGARIAN MINORITY IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC ................................................................ 30 A. The History of Hungarians in the Slovak Republic ........................................................ 31 B. Recent Developments Concerning the Situation of Ethnic Hungarians in Slovakia .............. 33 1. Relations Between Ethnic Slovaks and Hungarians in Slovakia ......................... 33 2. The Relationship Between the Slovak Republic and the Republic of Hungary .................................................. 42 III. SYSTEM OF MINORITY PROTECTION .................................. 47 A. Slovakia's Obligations Under the InternationalSystem of Human Rights Protection ...................................................... 47 B. Slovakia's ConstitutionalFramework for the Protection of NationalMinorities ..................... 53 C. Slovak Municipal Law Under International Human Rights and Slovak Constitutional A nalysis........................................................ .55 1. The State Language Law ................................. 55 2. Minority Language Education ....................... 70 3. Territorial Divisions .................................. 83 4. The Law on Names .................................... 91 * United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Office of the Staff Attorney; J.D., 1997, Northeastern
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality Members Mikael GUSTAFSSON Chair Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left Sweden Vänsterpartiet Lívia JÁRÓKA Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Hungary Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Keresztény Demokrata Néppárt Edite ESTRELA Vice-Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Portugal Partido Socialista Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Union pour un Mouvement Populaire Barbara MATERA Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Italy Forza Italia Regina BASTOS Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Portugal Partido Social Democrata Edit BAUER Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Slovakia Strana mad'arskej komunity- Magyar Közösség Pártja Godfrey BLOOM Member Non-attached Members United Kingdom United Kingdom Independence Party Emine BOZKURT Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Netherlands Partij van de Arbeid Andrea ČEŠKOVÁ Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Czechia Občanská demokratická strana 01/10/2021 1 Marije CORNELISSEN Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance Netherlands GroenLinks Tadeusz CYMAŃSKI Member Europe of freedom and democracy Group Poland Solidarna Polska Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
    [Show full text]
  • Gender in Politics 2009-2011
    Robert Schuman Institute Christian Democratic Robert Schuman International Center Institute Gender in Politics 2009-2011 Contact RSI For further information/questions on participation contact the RSI Team. Robert Schuman Institute Alkotás u. 5. 1123 Budapest, Hungary Tel.: +36-1-202-0000 Fax: +36-1-201-8985 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.schuman-institute.eu This project is fully financed by the Swedish International Development We also keep in touch with former Cooperation Agency (Sida) via KIC. Sida has not contributed to the participants, speakers and colleagues from formulation of the information material partner institutions through an official page Capacity Building for EPP Parties or activities and Sida does not have a on the social networking site at facebook: position towards expressed ideas. www.facebook.com/schuman.institute in Eastern and South Eastern Europe Robert Schuman Institute Preface Dear Readers, In this booklet you will find the outcome and lessons learned from our three-year project with the Swedish Christian Democratic International Center (KIC) as well as personal reflections by our participants, speakers, trainers and representatives of sister parties, cooperating institutions. Our project aimed at increasing women’s participation in political and public life by both capacity building and supporting EPP parties in adopting gender-sensitive practices. Nominal legal equality of men and women is of course guaranteed by constitution or other legislation in all the countries of Eastern and South Eastern Europe where we work. This is still in sharp contrast to the record of reality that shows unequal representation, no level playing field in public activity and a waste of resources to societies at large as well as our political parties.
    [Show full text]