DOCSLIB.ORG

Poll Verdict on the Future King Charles: "Unpopular and Untrusted – Even at Home"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Poll Verdict on the Future King Charles: MEDIA RELEASE Poll verdict on the future King Charles: "unpopular and untrusted – even at home" EMBARGOED UNTIL MONDAY 25 SEPTEMBER 2017 A new poll of public opinion in the UK is bad news for Prince Charles. Research conducted by FTI Consulting on behalf of the Australian Republic Movement shows that almost two-in-three Brits – 63% or those surveyed – do not want Prince Charles to replace the Queen when she dies. The largest group prefers another member of the British royal family. "Australia will have a new head of state within a few years. The only question is who," says Australian Republic Movement CEO and National Director Michael Cooney. "Will we have a hereditary King Charles III who does not even command the support of the British people – or will we have an Australian, chosen by Australians?" Remarkably, only 39% of those polled said they trust the man who will be King of England and could be King of Australia. "The British public has come to know Prince Charles over many decades – and these results show they hardly trust him at all," says Mr Cooney. "Why should we?" The results show monarchists can no longer rely on an argument for stability. “Change is coming, and the only question is what kind," Mr Cooney says. "A new head of state is inevitable – but an Australian republic is not. Australians can only vote no to King Charles by choosing a republic." “Australia must have this debate now, before we end up with King Charles as our head of state. We are a democracy and we should set our own timetable, not wait for someone else to decide. Australia should have a national vote by 2020 on the key questions so that we can change our constitution by 2022." Other highlights The institution of the monarchy itself may be in doubt, with 57% of respondents agreeing with the statement “hereditary rule is not appropriate in this modern era.” This rises to 67% among those aged under 35. Eighty percent (80%) of respondents agreed that a country’s head of state “should only be a citizen of that country,” rejecting on principle the current situation in Australia (of having a foreign head of state). Awareness of Australia’s predicament is lesser known in the UK, with 33% holding the view that the Prime Minister was Australia’s head of state, rather than the British Queen (29%). Only 17% of those polled thought the Queen is best placed to embody the ‘spirit of Australia’ as Head of State. More than half (53%) said she embodied the spirit of the United Kingdom. The poll of 2531 respondents was conducted between 25 and 28 August 2017. It has a margin of error of 1.9%. The ARM is campaigning for a national vote by 2020 to decide whether Australia should have an Australian as head of state and how that head of state should be chosen. Media Contact: Michael Cooney, National Director and CEO, Australian Republic Movement +61 417 248 650 FTI Research Data Tables FTI Consulting is an independent global business advisory firm dedicated to helping organizations manage change, mitigate risk and resolve disputes: financial, legal, operational, political & regulatory, reputational and transactional. FTI’s multi-disciplinary team consists of professionals who have served in major strategy firms, research consultancies, political campaigns, financial institutions and academic institutions. FTI have earned a reputation for gaining insights from hard-to-reach audiences. http://www.fticonsulting.com/ • Research was conducted online • Research was conducted from 25th to 28th August • n=2,531 respondents (UK Adult General Population) • Results are weighted in terms of age, gender, location and voting behaviour in the EU referendum & General Election • For more information: [email protected] Note: As a consequence of rounding up percentage results, the answers to some questions might not always add up to 100%. Who do you consider is best placed to embody the spirit of the United Kingdom as the head of state? 18 to 35 to Column % Total 50+ 34 49 Unweighted Base 2531 789 655 1087 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 An elected person specifically for this role 14 21 14 9 A government appointed person 3 6 4 1 Prime Minister 14 20 13 10 Head of UK Monarchy 53 31 51 69 Other 2 3 2 1 Don't know 14 18 16 10 Who do you consider is the head of state for Australia? 18 to 35 to Column % Total 50+ 34 49 Unweighted Base 2531 789 655 1087 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 An elected person specifically for this role 9 11 8 8 A government appointed person 6 11 4 4 Prime Minister 33 24 35 38 Head of UK Monarchy 29 18 30 35 Other 1 1 1 0 Don't know 23 35 23 14 Who do you consider is best placed to embody the spirit of Australia as the head of state? 18 to 35 to Column % Total 50+ 34 49 Unweighted Base 2531 789 655 1087 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 An elected person specifically for this role 18 20 18 18 A government appointed person 6 11 4 4 Prime Minister 30 24 30 35 Head of UK Monarchy 17 11 18 22 Other 1 1 1 1 Don't know 27 33 29 22 Generally speaking, which of the following best describes your attitude to the following: The Prince of Wales 18 to 35 to Column % Total 50+ 34 49 Unweighted Base 2531 789 655 1087 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 Trust 39 42 40 35 Cautious of 33 31 29 37 Suspicious of 13 15 13 12 Distrust 12 11 14 12 Hate 4 2 5 4 Who do you think should replace Her Majesty The Queen at the appropriate time to do so? 18 to 35 to Column % Total 50+ 34 49 Unweighted Base 2531 789 655 1087 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 The Prince of Wales 37 28 35 44 The Duke of Cambridge 41 40 42 42 Other Royal Family members 7 12 7 4 None There shouldn't be a monarchy 15 20 17 11 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements: Hereditary rule is not appropriate in this modern era 18 to Column % Total 35 to 49 50+ 34 Unweighted Base 2531 789 655 1087 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 (4) Strongly agree 24 29 25 20 (3) Slightly agree 34 38 36 29 (2) Slightly disagree 25 23 23 26 (1) Strongly disagree 18 10 15 25 Net: Agree 57 67 61 48 Net: Disagree 43 33 39 52 Mean 3 3 3 2 Effective Base 1718 519 442 759 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 Sample Base 2531 789 655 1087 Median 3 3 3 2 Interpolated Median 3 3 3 2 The head of state should only be a citizen of that country 18 to Column % Total 35 to 49 50+ 34 Unweighted Base 2531 789 655 1087 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 (4) Strongly agree 46 38 45 53 (3) Slightly agree 33 40 37 26 (2) Slightly disagree 14 17 14 13 (1) Strongly disagree 6 5 4 8 Net: Agree 80 78 82 79 Net: Disagree 20 22 18 21 Mean 3 3 3 3 Effective Base 1718 519 442 759 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 Sample Base 2531 789 655 1087 Median 3 3 3 4 Interpolated Median 3 3 3 4 Continued over page… The citizens alone should choose who their head of state is 18 to 35 to Column % Total 50+ 34 49 Unweighted Base 2531 789 655 1087 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 (4) Strongly agree 26 34 25 22 (3) Slightly agree 32 39 38 24 (2) Slightly disagree 23 18 21 27 (1) Strongly disagree 19 9 15 28 Net: Agree 58 73 64 45 Net: Disagree 42 27 36 55 Mean 3 3 3 2 Effective Base 1718 519 442 759 Weighted Base 2531 738 691 1102 Sample Base 2531 789 655 1087 Median 3 3 3 2 Interpolated Median 3 3 3 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Albion Full Cast Announced
    Press release: Thursday 2 January The Almeida Theatre announces the full cast for its revival of Mike Bartlett’s Albion, directed by Rupert Goold, following the play’s acclaimed run in 2017. ALBION by Mike Bartlett Direction: Rupert Goold; Design: Miriam Buether; Light: Neil Austin Sound: Gregory Clarke; Movement Director: Rebecca Frecknall Monday 3 February – Saturday 29 February 2020 Press night: Wednesday 5 February 7pm ★★★★★ “The play that Britain needs right now” The Telegraph This is our little piece of the world, and we’re allowed to do with it, exactly as we like. Yes? In the ruins of a garden in rural England. In a house which was once a home. A woman searches for seeds of hope. Following a sell-out run in 2017, Albion returns to the Almeida for four weeks only. Joining the previously announced Victoria Hamilton (awarded Best Actress at 2018 Critics’ Circle Awards for this role) and reprising their roles are Nigel Betts, Edyta Budnik, Wil Coban, Margot Leicester, Nicholas Rowe and Helen Schlesinger. They will be joined by Angel Coulby, Daisy Edgar-Jones, Dónal Finn and Geoffrey Freshwater. Mike Bartlett’s plays for the Almeida include his adaptation of Maxim Gorky’s Vassa, Game and the multi-award winning King Charles III (Olivier Award for Best New Play) which premiered at the Almeida before West End and Broadway transfers, a UK and international tour. His television adaptation of the play was broadcast on BBC Two in 2017. Other plays include Snowflake (Old Fire Station and Kiln Theatre); Wild; An Intervention; Bull (won the Olivier Award for Outstanding Achievement in an Affiliate Theatre); an adaptation of Medea; Chariots of Fire; 13; Decade (co-writer); Earthquakes in London; Love, Love, Love; Cock (Olivier Award for Outstanding Achievement in an Affiliate Theatre); Contractions and My Child Artefacts.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708
    international journal of military history and historiography 39 (2019) 7-33 IJMH brill.com/ijmh Britain, Austria, and the “Burden of War” in the Western Mediterranean, 1703–1708 Caleb Karges* Concordia University Irvine, California [email protected] Abstract The Austrian and British alliance in the Western Mediterranean from 1703 to 1708 is used as a case study in the problem of getting allies to cooperate at the strategic and operational levels of war. Differing grand strategies can lead to disagreements about strategic priorities and the value of possible operations. However, poor personal rela- tions can do more to wreck an alliance than differing opinions over strategy. While good personal relations can keep an alliance operating smoothly, it is often military necessity (and the threat of grand strategic failure) that forces important compro- mises. In the case of the Western Mediterranean, it was the urgent situation created by the Allied defeat at Almanza that forced the British and Austrians to create a work- able solution. Keywords War of the Spanish Succession – Coalition Warfare – Austria – Great Britain – Mediter- ranean – Spain – Strategy * Caleb Karges obtained his MLitt and PhD in Modern History from the University of St An- drews, United Kingdom in 2010 and 2015, respectively. His PhD thesis on the Anglo-Austrian alliance during the War of the Spanish Succession received the International Commission of Military History’s “André Corvisier Prize” in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor of History at Concordia University Irvine in Irvine, California, usa. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/24683302-03901002Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 03:43:06AM via free access <UN> 8 Karges 1 Introduction1 There were few wars in European history before 1789 as large as the War of the Spanish Succession.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocryphilia
    Apocryphilia Simon Matthews Our Island Story Before the teaching of history to children in this country descended to its current formula of dinosaurs + Romans + Henry VIII + Hitler (with a side helping of slavery) the past was taught in a rather different way. Many who were at primary school pre-1980 will be familiar with it: Our Island Story, the carefully nuanced account of how ‘the British Isles’ produced the greatest and most progressive people in the world. Written in 1905 it was, remarkably (or not?), still a common textbook 70 years later. It’s durability, popularity and influence, over a century later, has been recently cited by prime minister David Cameron and the centre-right think tank Civitas as an example of something they would like to see updated and reintroduced. Why is this? The Our Island Story narrative certainly has its attractions. Stressing national unity, in which Englishness is overwhelmingly predominant, it gives key early roles to Alfred the Great and William the Conqueror – the latter not, of course, English – with the repelling of foreign invasions and conquests (nothing since 1066) a critical factor, highlighted by the dispersal of the Spanish Armada in 1588 and, latterly, the defeat of Napoleon (1815) and Hitler (1940). British/English excursions into Europe are seen as the brilliantly executed ventures of plucky underdogs (Agincourt, Waterloo and Dunkirk are typical here) against overwhelming odds. The literary backdrop, from Shakespeare, Milton, Pepys, Dickens etc., embellishes this. Milton appears more or less in tandem with Cromwell, both as exemplars of grimly moral, upstanding and typically English parliamentarians – refusing to bow down before Rome and ensuring the lasting legitimacy of the House of Commons.....this being portrayed throughout the book as the finest and fairest legislature in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • KC3 Play Guide R1 Compr
    PLAY GUIDE 2016 2017 About ATC .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction to the Play ............................................................................................................................. 2 Meet the Playwright ................................................................................................................................... 2 Meet the Characters .................................................................................................................................. 3 The Real Royals ......................................................................................................................................... 5 The Line of Succession .......................................... ................................................................................... 12 British Parliament and Positions .............................................................................................................. 13 British Politics ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Royal Rituals ............................................................................................................................................. 18 King Charles and the Bard .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Colonial Book and the Writing of American History, 1790-1855
    HISTORY’S IMPRINT: THE COLONIAL BOOK AND THE WRITING OF AMERICAN HISTORY, 1790-1855 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Lindsay E.M. DiCuirci, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Elizabeth Hewitt, Adviser Jared Gardner Susan Williams Copyright by Lindsay Erin Marks DiCuirci 2010 ABSTRACT “History’s Imprint: The Colonial Book and the Writing of American History, 1790-1855” investigates the role that reprinted colonial texts played in the development of historical consciousness in nineteenth-century America. In the early decades of the nineteenth century, antiquarians and historians began to make a concerted effort to amass and preserve an American archive of manuscript and print material, in addition to other artifacts and “curiosities” from the colonial period. Publishers and editors also began to prepare new editions of colonial texts for publication, introducing nineteenth-century readers to these historical artifacts for the first time. My dissertation considers the role of antiquarian collecting and historical publishing—the reprinting of colonial texts—in the production of popular historical narratives. I study the competing narratives of America’s colonial origins that emerged between 1790 and 1855 as a result of this new commitment to historicism and antiquarianism. I argue that the acts of selecting, editing, and reprinting were ideologically charged as these colonial texts were introduced to new audiences. Instead of functioning as pure reproductions of colonial books, these texts were used to advocate specific religious, political, and cultural positions in the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College Department of History the Constitution of 1812
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY THE CONSTITUTION OF 1812: AN EXERCISE IN SPANISH CONSTITUTIONAL THOUGHT ALLISON MUCK SPRING 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in History with honors in History Reviewed and approved* by the following: Amy Greenberg Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of History and Women's Studies Thesis Supervisor Michael Milligan Senior Lecturer in History, Director of Undergraduate Studies Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT In March of 1812, the Spanish representative assembly known as the Cortes promulgated a decidedly liberal constitution in the midst of Napoleonic invasion. The Constitution of 1812 governed Spain for the next two years until its abrogation upon the return of Fernando VII. This momentary interval of liberalism appears as an unexpected development in the history of Spain. Undoubtedly, the Constitution’s liberal, progressive, and reformist sentiments differ greatly from the conservative national culture and traditional institutions of Spain at this moment in history. This thesis addresses the causes leading Spain to adopt a constitution intent on empowering the representative Cortes, limiting the Spanish monarchy, and unifying the Spanish nation. Inherent in this project is an analysis of the distinctly Spanish brand of liberalism which attempted to combine both liberal and nationalist sentiments within the Constitution’s provisions. The rhetoric of the Constitution’s drafters claims to be attempting to revive an ancient Spanish constitution and system of government where strong representative institutions and a written constitution upheld the individual rights of the Spanish people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereign States of the Americas Larouche’S Program for Continental Development
    LAROUCHE IN 2004 # www.larouchein2004.com The Sovereign States of the Americas LaRouche’s Program for Continental Development Contents PREFACE 2 The Monroe Doctrine Today CHAPTER 1 8 The Deadly Change of 1789-1815 CHAPTER 2 16 Long-Wave Vernadsky Cycles CHAPTER 3 17 Our Planet’s Noëtic Regions CHAPTER 4 20 Fight for the Sovereign Republics of the Americas CHAPTER 5 29 Great Infrastructure Projects for the Americas APPENDIX 38 Synarchism as a System ON THE COVER: Lyndon LaRouche: EIRNS/Stuart Lewis. © September 2003 L04PA-2003-010 Paid for by LaRouche in 2004 EIRNS/Susana Gutierez Barros Lyndon LaRouche addresses a conference in Saltillo, Mexico on Nov. 5, 2002. PREFACE The Monroe Doctrine Today by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. September 4, 2003 p to the present date, John Quincy Adams member of the U.S. House of Representatives. remains the most significant of the architects of Throughout this, the leading features of that expressed Uwhat might be fairly distinguished as “the work- genius included his foresight and contributions respect- ing foreign policy of the United States of America.” ing the role of diplomacy in defining the future coast-to- Although he was already a distinguished diplomat coast and north-south borders of the U.S., and in the before joining President Monroe’s Cabinet, his matured crafting of U.S. policy toward the other states of the genius is typified by three of his leading roles in design- Americas. ing our government’s approach to its foreign policies, His role in defining U.S. policy for the Americas, is beginning his part as Secretary of State under President associated, most notably, with three model precedents.
    [Show full text]
  • Mike Bartlett's Future History in King Charles
    International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science ISSN: 2307-924X www.ijlass.org The Once and Future King: Mike Bartlett’s Future History in King Charles III Ernest Nolan Madonna University Few things are as important to the identity of the British people as their country’s contribution to Western literature and their particular form of constitutional monarchy. Playwright Mike Bartlett pays tribute to both of these themes in his “future-history” play, King Charles III: to Shakespeare, whom Ben Jonson called “Our Star of Poets” and undoubtedly still reigns as the greatest writer in the English language, and to the Royal Family. In fact, Mike Bartlett has said, The idea for King Charles III arrived in my imagination with the form and content very clear, and inextricably linked. It would be a play about the moment Charles takes the throne, and how his conscience would lead him to refuse to sign a bill into law. An epic royal family drama, dealing with power and national constitution, was the content, and therefore the form had surely to be Shakespearean. (“Mike Bartlett: How I Wrote King Charles III”) Bartlett adopts the form of the five-act Shakespearean history play, using blank verse for the scenes involving the Royals—unrhymed iambic pentameter with rhyming couplets at the end of each scene—and plain prose for the scenes involving the commoners. Like Shakespeare, Bartlett also includes a subplot that provides counterpoint to the main action. The story of Prince Harry and Jess, the anti-monarchy young art student whom Harry falls for, brings Harry to the point of wanting to give up his identity as a member of the Royal Family at the same time as the Royal Family itself faces the possibility that the monarchy will not survive if the country is brought to the brink of civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • Bakalářská Práce the Debate Over the Future of the British
    Bakalářská práce 2017 Elena Vashchenko Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Bakalářská práce The Debate over the Future of the British Monarchy in Selected Newspapers Elena Vashchenko Plzeň 2017 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Studijní program Filologie Studijní obor Cizí jazyky pro komerční praxi Kombinace angličtina – ruština Bakalářská práce The Debate over the Future of the British Monarchy in Selected Newspapers Elena Vashchenko Vedoucí práce: Ph.Dr. Alice Tihelková Ph.D. Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Fakulta filozofická Západočeské univerzity v Plzni Plzeň 2017 Prohlašuji, že jsem práci zpracovala samostatně a použila jen uvedených pramenů a literatury. Plzeň, duben 2017 ……………………… Poděkování Mé poděkování patří PhDr. Alici Tihelkové, Ph.D.za odborné vedení, trpělivost a ochotu, kterou mi v průběhu zpracování bakalářské práce věnovala. Plzeň, 24. dubna 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 2 THE BRITISH MONARCHY ................................................................... 3 2.1 The definition of monarchy .................................................................... 3 2.2 Constitutional monarchy in the UK ....................................................... 3 2.3 The Royal Family .................................................................................... 5 2.3.1 The Queen .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text (PDF)
    63 IAN WARD "It isn't what I hoped:" Shakespeare and the Performance of Kingship in Bartlett's King Charles III Mike Bartlett's King Charles III was first performed at the Almeida Theatre in Lon- don in April 2014, after which it transferred to the Wyndham before going on tour across the UK throughout 2015 and into 2016 (cf. Bartlett 2014a). It was immediately acclaimed: a "snowball success" according to the Evening Standard (Curtis 2014). According to Time Out Bartlett's play was "brilliantly audacious," in sum "theatrical dynamite"1 (McGinn 2015). "Bold, brilliant and unstoppably entertaining, an intelli- gent, empathetic, moving look at the power and limitations of the modern monarchy," the reviewer in The Times gushed, "theatre doesn't get much better than this" (Max- well 2014). The Daily Telegraph was just as impressed: "Outstanding and provoca- tive," its reviewer concluded, "the most spectacular, gripping and wickedly entertain- ing piece of lèse-majesté that British theatre has ever seen" (Spencer 2014). King Charles III tells the story of what might happen in the weeks which follow the death of Queen Elizabeth II. More particularly it anticipates what might happen within the respective walls of Westminster and Buckingham Palace if her eldest son decides to pursue a slightly different way of ruling. There are other locations, and different envi- ronments. There is a comic sub-plot located in London club-land. But King Charles III is principally about the highest of high-politics; for which reason critics have tend- ed to place it, understandably, within the genre of "state of the nation plays," of the kind familiar in the work of an earlier generation of radical playwrights such as David Hare, Howard Brenton and Caryl Churchill (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • King Charles Iii by Mike Bartlett
    KING CHARLES III BY MIKE BARTLETT DRAMATISTS PLAY SERVICE INC. KING CHARLES III Copyright © 2016, Mike Bartlett All Rights Reserved CAUTION: Professionals and amateurs are hereby warned that performance of KING CHARLES III is subject to payment of a royalty. It is fully protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America, and of all countries covered by the International Copyright Union (including the Dominion of Canada and the rest of the British Commonwealth), and of all countries covered by the Pan- American Copyright Convention, the Universal Copyright Convention, the Berne Convention, and of all countries with which the United States has reciprocal copyright relations. All rights, including without limitation professional/amateur stage rights, motion picture, recitation, lecturing, public reading, radio broadcasting, television, video or sound recording, all other forms of mechanical, electronic and digital reproduction, transmission and distribution, such as CD, DVD, the Internet, private and file-sharing networks, information storage and retrieval systems, photocopying, and the rights of translation into foreign languages are strictly reserved. Particular emphasis is placed upon the matter of readings, permission for which must be secured from the Author’s agent in writing. The English language stock and amateur stage performance rights in the United States, its territories, possessions and Canada for KING CHARLES III are controlled exclusively by DRAMATISTS PLAY SERVICE, INC., 440 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10016. No professional or nonprofessional performance of the Play may be given without obtaining in advance the written permission of DRAMATISTS PLAY SERVICE, INC., and paying the requisite fee. Inquiries concerning all other rights should be addressed to William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, 11 Madison Ave, 18th floor, New York, NY 10010.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of New Plays 2016–2017
    PRESORTED STANDARD U.S. POSTAGE PAID GRAND RAPIDS, MI PERMIT #1 Catalogue of New Plays 2016–2017 ISBN: 978-0-8222-3542-2 DISCOUNTS See page 6 for details on DISCOUNTS for Educators, Libraries, and Bookstores 9 7 8 0 8 2 2 2 3 5 4 2 2 Bold new plays. Recipient of the Obie Award for Commitment to the Publication of New Work Timeless classics. Since 1936. 440 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10016 Tel. 212-683-8960 Fax 212-213-1539 [email protected] OFFICERS Peter Hagan, President Mary Harden, Vice President Patrick Herold, Secretary David Moore, Treasurer Stephen Sultan, President Emeritus BOARD OF DIRECTORS Peter Hagan Mary Harden DPS proudly represents the Patrick Herold ® Joyce Ketay 2016 Tony Award winner and nominees Jonathan Lomma Donald Margulies for BEST PLAY Lynn Nottage Polly Pen John Patrick Shanley Representing the American theatre by publishing and licensing the works of new and established playwrights Formed in 1936 by a number of prominent playwrights and theatre agents, Dramatists Play Service, Inc. was created to foster opportunity and provide support for playwrights by publishing acting editions of their plays and handling the nonprofessional and professional leasing rights to these works. Catalogue of New Plays 2016–2017 © 2016 Dramatists Play Service, Inc. CATALOGUE 16-17.indd 1 10/3/2016 3:49:22 PM Dramatists Play Service, Inc. A Letter from the President Dear Subscriber: A lot happened in 1936. Jesse Owens triumphed at the Berlin Olympics. Edward VIII abdicated to marry Wallis Simpson. The Hindenburg took its maiden voyage. And Dramatists Play Service was founded by the Dramatists Guild of America and an intrepid group of agents.
    [Show full text]