27561736.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

27561736.Pdf ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Annex is a complement to the OECD Territorial Review of Montreal. It includes three case studies, two of which focus on issues of metropolitan governance (Minneapolis Saint-Paul/US and Stuttgart/Germany), and one on metropolitan competitiveness (Philadelphia/US). Individual contributions were provided by Marsha Ann Blumenthal, University of St.Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota (the case of Minneapolis Saint-Paul), Werner Bächle, Jürgen Guilliard, Jürgen Ludwig and Suzan Ünver from Verband Region Stuttgart (the case of Stuttgart), and Stephen P. Mullin, John Del Roccili, David Crawford and Kevin Babyak of Econsult Corporation (the case of Philadelphia). At the OECD, Tim Goodspeed, Erin Haddock, Lina Kee and Soo-Jin Kim have contributed to the final drafts of the case studies. The Territorial Review of Montreal and its Annex was co-ordinated by Mrs. Lamia Kamal-Chaoui, Administrator, under the direction of Mr. Mario Pezzini, Head of the OECD Territorial Reviews and Governance Division. Georgina Regnier prepared this annex for publication. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNEX 1. MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL............................................................................................. 7 Portrait of the metropolitan region.............................................................................................................. 7 Definition of the Minneapolis-Saint Paul metropolitan area................................................................... 7 Demography ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Output and income .................................................................................................................................. 8 Poverty and income disparities................................................................................................................ 9 Labour market ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Industrial mix......................................................................................................................................... 12 Exports................................................................................................................................................... 12 Innovation, research and development .................................................................................................. 13 Entrepreneurship and foreign investments ............................................................................................ 13 Human capital........................................................................................................................................ 14 Transportation........................................................................................................................................ 15 Institutional framework............................................................................................................................. 16 Metropolitan governance .......................................................................................................................... 17 Local financial and fiscal arrangements.................................................................................................... 19 County budgets...................................................................................................................................... 20 City budgets........................................................................................................................................... 20 Borrowing.............................................................................................................................................. 21 Property tax ........................................................................................................................................... 22 Tax base disparities ............................................................................................................................... 23 Local government grants ....................................................................................................................... 25 Government growth............................................................................................................................... 25 Intergovernmental co-ordination............................................................................................................... 26 Vertical co-ordination............................................................................................................................ 26 Horizontal co-ordination ....................................................................................................................... 28 Public-private partnerships.................................................................................................................... 28 Case study 1: Economic development ...................................................................................................... 29 Federal government............................................................................................................................... 29 State of Minnesota................................................................................................................................. 29 Metropolitan Council............................................................................................................................. 30 The City of Minneapolis........................................................................................................................ 31 City of St. Paul ...................................................................................................................................... 32 Chambers of commerce......................................................................................................................... 33 ANNEX 2. THE STUTTGART METROPOLITAN REGION .............................................................. 34 Defining the metropolitan area of the Stuttgart Region ............................................................................ 34 Indicators of socio-economic performance............................................................................................... 36 Output and economic growth ................................................................................................................ 36 Unemployment ...................................................................................................................................... 36 Structural mix ........................................................................................................................................ 37 Innovation and R&D ............................................................................................................................. 38 Accessibility .......................................................................................................................................... 39 3 Institutional framework............................................................................................................................. 40 Local public finance and fiscal arrangements........................................................................................... 43 Municipal finance.................................................................................................................................. 43 County finances..................................................................................................................................... 50 Local taxation and economic development ........................................................................................... 52 The Stuttgart Regional Organisation......................................................................................................... 53 Representation ....................................................................................................................................... 53 Finances of the Stuttgart Regional Organisation................................................................................... 53 Participation of local authorities............................................................................................................ 57 Participation of the private sector and the civic society ........................................................................ 57 Main challenges for the regional body .................................................................................................. 58 Case study 1: Public transport in the Stuttgart region............................................................................... 61 Competent bodies .................................................................................................................................. 61 The regional transport plan.................................................................................................................... 61 The role of the Stuttgart Regional Organisation.................................................................................... 62 Stuttgart Transport Association............................................................................................................. 63 Financing of local public transport.......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Managing Metropolitan Growth: Reflections on the Twin Cities Experience
    _____________________________________________________________________________________________ MANAGING METROPOLITAN GROWTH: REFLECTIONS ON THE TWIN CITIES EXPERIENCE Ted Mondale and William Fulton A Case Study Prepared for: The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy © September 2003 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ MANAGING METROPOLITAN GROWTH: REFLECTIONS ON THE TWIN CITIES EXPERIENCE BY TED MONDALE AND WILLIAM FULTON1 I. INTRODUCTION: MANAGING METROPOLITAN GROWTH PRAGMATICALLY Many debates about whether and how to manage urban growth on a metropolitan or regional level focus on the extremes of laissez-faire capitalism and command-and-control government regulation. This paper proposes an alternative, or "third way," of managing metropolitan growth, one that seeks to steer in between the two extremes, focusing on a pragmatic approach that acknowledges both the market and government policy. Laissez-faire advocates argue that we should leave growth to the markets. If the core cities fail, it is because people don’t want to live, shop, or work there anymore. If the first ring suburbs decline, it is because their day has passed. If exurban areas begin to choke on large-lot, septic- driven subdivisions, it is because that is the lifestyle that people individually prefer. Government policy should be used to accommodate these preferences rather than seek to shape any particular regional growth pattern. Advocates on the other side call for a strong regulatory approach. Their view is that regional and state governments should use their power to engineer precisely where and how local communities should grow for the common good. Among other things, this approach calls for the creation of a strong—even heavy-handed—regional boundary that restricts urban growth to particular geographical areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Baden-Württemberg/ India
    Consulate General of India Munich ***** General and Bilateral Brief- Baden-Württemberg/ India Baden-Württemberg located in Germany’s Southwest side, lies at the very heart of Europe and shares borders with two other European countries – France, Switzerland and three German States – Rhineland Palatinate, Hesse and Bavaria. In terms of both its area and population size, Baden- Württemberg is the third biggest among the 16 German States. The state population is 11 million. It is the third largest in Germany after North-Rhine Westphalia (17.93 million) and Bavaria (13.07 million) and is larger than individual population of 15 as many as other member states of the EU. (For more detail: Annexure – 1 & 2). Salient Features of Baden-Württemberg Geography: Baden-Württemberg with an area of 35,751 sqkm is characterized by a distinct landscape. In the West, the scenery is characterized by the Black Forest and the Rhine Plain, in the South by Lake Constance and the ridge of the Alps, in the East by the Swabian Alb hills, and in the North by the Hohenloh plain and the uplands of the Kraichgau region. Forest makes up around 40 per cent of Baden-Württemberg’s total area. People: The people of Baden-Württemberg are known for their innovative spirit and industriousness which largely compensates them for lack of natural resources in BW. Their skills and expertise, commitment to industry, science, education, culture have transformed South west Germany into one of the world’s most successful regions. The total foreign population of Baden-Württemberg is over 1.6 million (11%), making Baden- Württemberg one of the most immigrant-rich of Germany’s flatland states.
    [Show full text]
  • Landeszentrale Für Politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg, Director: Lothar Frick 6Th Fully Revised Edition, Stuttgart 2008
    BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG A Portrait of the German Southwest 6th fully revised edition 2008 Publishing details Reinhold Weber and Iris Häuser (editors): Baden-Württemberg – A Portrait of the German Southwest, published by the Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg, Director: Lothar Frick 6th fully revised edition, Stuttgart 2008. Stafflenbergstraße 38 Co-authors: 70184 Stuttgart Hans-Georg Wehling www.lpb-bw.de Dorothea Urban Please send orders to: Konrad Pflug Fax: +49 (0)711 / 164099-77 Oliver Turecek [email protected] Editorial deadline: 1 July, 2008 Design: Studio für Mediendesign, Rottenburg am Neckar, Many thanks to: www.8421medien.de Printed by: PFITZER Druck und Medien e. K., Renningen, www.pfitzer.de Landesvermessungsamt Title photo: Manfred Grohe, Kirchentellinsfurt Baden-Württemberg Translation: proverb oHG, Stuttgart, www.proverb.de EDITORIAL Baden-Württemberg is an international state – The publication is intended for a broad pub- in many respects: it has mutual political, lic: schoolchildren, trainees and students, em- economic and cultural ties to various regions ployed persons, people involved in society and around the world. Millions of guests visit our politics, visitors and guests to our state – in state every year – schoolchildren, students, short, for anyone interested in Baden-Würt- businessmen, scientists, journalists and numer- temberg looking for concise, reliable informa- ous tourists. A key job of the State Agency for tion on the southwest of Germany. Civic Education (Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg, LpB) is to inform Our thanks go out to everyone who has made people about the history of as well as the poli- a special contribution to ensuring that this tics and society in Baden-Württemberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionale Entwicklung Der Betriebsgrößenstruktur in Der Landwirtschaft
    Wirtschaft, Statistisches Monatsheft Baden-Württemberg 3/2006 Arbeitsmarkt Regionale Entwicklung der Betriebsgrößenstruktur in der Landwirtschaft In Baden-Württemberg spielen zwei Erbrechte dem die Flächen ungeteilt an jenen Erben über- eine entscheidende Rolle für die ursprünglichen gehen, der den Hof übernimmt. Dies hatte und und aktuellen Hofgrößen: Die Realteilung (1), hat neben der Ertragsfähigkeit der Flächen ein- bei der Flächen bis zur Unwirtschaftlichkeit zer- en Einfluss auf das „Höfesterben“. In der Rhein- splittert wurden und das Anerbenrecht (2), bei ebene, den Gäuplatten und dem nördlichen Landwirtschaftliche Betriebe in den Stadt- und Landkreisen Baden-Württembergs S1 1979 bis 2005 Zunahme der durchschnittlichen Betriebsgröße in ha unter 10 10 bis unter 15 15 “ “ 20 Mannheim Main-Tauber-Kreis Neckar-Odenwald-Kreis 20 und mehr Heidelberg Rhein-Neckar-Kreis Lkr Heilbronn Abnahme der Betriebe Hohenlohekreis Schwäbisch Hall Lkr Karlsruhe Heilbronn 1 Kästchen entspricht 50 Betrieben Karlsruhe Enzkreis Rastatt Ludwigsburg Pforzheim Rems-Murr-Kreis Ostalbkreis Baden-Baden Stuttgart Böblingen Calw Esslingen Göppingen Heidenheim Freudenstadt Tübingen Ortenaukreis Reutlingen Ulm Alb-Donau-Kreis Rottweil Zollernalbkreis Emmendingen Freiburg Schwarzwald-Baar-Kreis Biberach Tuttlingen Sigmaringen Breisgau-Hochschwarzwald Ravensburg Konstanz Lörrach Waldshut Bodenseekreis Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg Landesinformationssystem 34-34-06-001 28 Statistisches Monatsheft Baden-Württemberg 3/2006 Wirtschaft, Arbeitsmarkt Landwirtschaftliche
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Heat Islands in the Arctic Cities: an Updated Compilation of in Situ and Remote-Sensing Estimations
    Applied Meteorology and Climatology Proceedings 2020: contributions in the pandemic year Adv. Sci. Res., 18, 51–57, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-18-51-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Urban heat islands in the Arctic cities: an updated compilation of in situ and remote-sensing estimations Igor Esau1, Victoria Miles1, Andrey Soromotin2, Oleg Sizov3, Mikhail Varentsov4, and Pavel Konstantinov4 1Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Centre/Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Thormohlensgt. 47, Bergen, 5006, Norway 2Institute of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, Tyumen State University, 625000, Tyumen, Russia 3Oil and Gas Research Institute RAS, Moscow, Russia 4Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Geography/Research Computing Center, Leninskie Gory 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia Correspondence: Igor Esau ([email protected]) Received: 17 July 2020 – Revised: 10 April 2021 – Accepted: 19 April 2021 – Published: 3 May 2021 Abstract. Persistent warm urban temperature anomalies – urban heat islands (UHIs) – significantly enhance already amplified climate warming in the Arctic. Vulnerability of urban infrastructure in the Arctic cities urges a region-wide study of the UHI intensity and its attribution to UHI drivers. This study presents an overview of the surface and atmospheric UHIs in all circum-Arctic settlements (118 in total) with the population larger than 3000 inhabitants. The surface UHI (SUHI) is obtained from the land surface temperature (LST) data products of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) archive over 2000–2016. The at- mospheric UHI is obtained from screen-level temperature provided by the Urban Heat Island Arctic Research Campaign (UHIARC) observational network over 2015–2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulm City Centre
    DIRECTIONS TO BECHTLE IT SYSTEM HOUSE ULM Please observe all low-emission zones! Coming from Stuttgart, Munich (A8), Follow the signs for IKEA Göppingen (B10): At the Blaubeurer Ring roundabout, take ... (see On the A8 motorway, take exit 62 – Ulm-West directions for coming from Stuttgart/Munich) Continue on the B10 towards Ulm, following the signs for IKEA Coming from Sigmaringen, Ehingen (B311): At the Blaubeurer Ring roundabout, take the exit Take the B311 towards Ulm. At Industriegebiet onto B28 towards Blaubeuren Donautal (industrial estate), turn left onto West- Continue on the B28 for approx. 1.7 km until you tangente towards Blaustein/Wissenschaftsstadt/ reach the crossroads with traffic lights after the IKEA Blautal-Center Continue for 4.3 km and take the right turn be- Turn left into Jägerstrasse fore the Blautalbrücke (Blautal Bridge) towards At the next set of traffic lights, turn left again into the city centre/IKEA Einsteinstrasse At the first sets of traffic lights, turn right into Take the first turn on the left into Magirus-Deutz- Herrlinger Strasse towards Söflingen Strasse (sign for Stadtregal Business Centre Ulm) Go straight on at the next set of lights Take the next right. Bechtle is on the left-hand Take the first turn on the left into Magirus-Deutz- side (on-site parking is available) Strasse ... (see directions for coming from Stutt- gart/Munich) Coming from Kempten, Aalen (A7), Friedrichshafen (B30): By Public Transport from Ulm Hbf (main station): Take the B28 towards Ulm and go through the Take the bus number 30 or 37 from the central tunnel after the Adenauerbrücke (Adenauer bus station (Zentraler Omnibus-Bahnhof) to the Bridge) Einsteinstrasse stop (marked “H” on the map) A8 Stuttgart/München Berliner Ring Dornstadt Albert-Einstein-AlleeUniversity Hospital Botanic S t Gardens u t t g a r B10 te r S tr .
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
    ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stuttgart Region – Where Growth Meets Innovation Design: Atelier Brückner/Ph Oto: M
    The Stuttgart Region – Where Growth Meets Innovation oto: M. Jungblut Design: Atelier Brückner/Ph CERN, Universe of Particles/ Mercedes-Benz B-Class F-Cell, Daimler AG Mercedes-Benz The Stuttgart Region at a Glance Situated in the federal state of Baden- The Stuttgart Region is the birthplace and Württemberg in the southwest of Germa- home of Gottlieb Daimler and Robert ny, the Stuttgart Region comprises the Bosch, two important figures in the history City of Stuttgart (the state capital) and its of the motor car. Even today, vehicle five surrounding counties. With a popula- design and production as well as engineer- tion of 2.7 million, the area boasts a highly ing in general are a vital part of the region’s advanced industrial infrastructure and economy. Besides its traditional strengths, enjoys a well-earned reputation for its eco- the Stuttgart Region is also well known nomic strength, cutting-edge technology for its strong creative industries and its and exceptionally high quality of life. The enthusiasm for research and development. region has its own parliamentary assembly, ensuring fast and effective decision-mak- All these factors make the Stuttgart ing on regional issues such as local public Region one of the most dynamic and effi- transport, regional planning and business cient regions in the world – innovative in development. approach, international in outlook. Stuttgart Region Key Economic Data Population: 2.7 million from 170 countries Area: 3,654 km2 Population density: 724 per km2 People in employment: 1.5 million Stuttgart Region GDP: 109.8 billion e Corporate R&D expenditure as % of GDP: 7.5 Export rate of manufacturing industry: 63.4 % Productivity: 72,991 e/employee Per capita income: 37,936 e Data based on reports by Wirtschaftsförderung Region Stuttgart GmbH, Verband Region Stuttgart, IHK Region Stuttgart and Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg, 2014 Stuttgart-Marketing GmbH Oliver Schuster A Great Place to Live and Work Top Quality of Life Germany‘s Culture Capitals 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Towns
    24 Satellite Towns Introduction 'Satellite town' was a term used in the year immediately after the World War I as an alternative to Garden City. It subsequently developed a much wider meaning to include any town that is closely related to or dependent on a larger city. The first specific usage of the word ‘satellite town’ was in 1915 by G.R. Taylor in ‘ Satellite Cities’ referring to towns around Chicago, St. Louis and other American cities where industries had escaped congestion and crafted manufacturer’s town in the surrounding area. The new town is planned and built to serve a particular local industry, or as a dormitory or overspill town for people who work in and nearby metropolis. Satellite Town, can also be defined as a town which is self contained and limited in size, built in the vicinity of a large town or city and houses and employs those who otherwise create a demand for expansion of the existing settlement, but dependent on the parent city to some extent for population and major services. A distinction is made between a consumer satellite (essentially a dormitory suburb with few facilities) and a production satellite (with a capacity for commercial, industrial and other production distinct from that of the parent town, so a new town) town or satellite city is a concept of urban planning and referring to a small or medium-sized city that is near a large metropolis, but predates that metropolis suburban expansion and is atleast partially independent from that metropolis economically. CITIES, URBANISATION AND URBAN SYSTEMS 414 Satellite and Dormitory Towns The suburb of an urban centre where due to locational advantage the residential, industrial and educational centres are developed are known as "satellite or dormitory towns." It has a benefit of providing clean environment and spacious ground for residential and industrial expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Poverty Soldier Page 1 Not Participate in Or Contribute to Our That Things Still Seem to Be Getting Worse in St
    THE ANTI-POVERTY SOLDIER By Clarence Hightower, Ph.D. Although Twin Cities poverty dips Now, a new report from the Met Council published in many places, it continues to rise in February, finds that while poverty has started to trend downward across much of the metropolitan in St. Paul area, there are still neighborhoods where it is April 13, 2017 | Vol. 4 No. 15 growing. Among the areas where poverty is on the rise are some northern suburbs and the City of St. In 2011, following the release of the U.S. Census Paul. In contrast to Minneapolis, where the Bureau’s American Community Survey, Minnesota poverty rate has remained “relatively flat” the last Compass published a statistical profile titled few years, the number of St. Paul residents at or “Poverty in Saint Paul.” The data, which was below 185 percent of the federal poverty alarming, showed that nearly one-quarter of all St. threshold (which is the baseline of how the Met Paul residents lived below the federal poverty Council defines poverty in its study) continues to guidelines. And, of the more than 67,000 people rise. Today in St. Paul, the number of individuals living in poverty, approximately 25,000 were living below that threshold is estimated to be children. around 125,000. Another disturbing trend highlighted by Moreover, pockets of concentrated poverty are Minnesota Compass was the rate at which poverty swelling in all corners of St. Paul. According to the was increasing in the capital city. From 1999 to latest data areas such as St. Paul’s East Side, North 2010, poverty rose significantly at the national, End, Thomas-Dale, Summit-University, and state, and the Twin Cities metro level.
    [Show full text]
  • Landrat Klaus Pavel, Ostalbkreis
    Der Ostalbkreis – am Rande und doch mittendrin Metropolregion Nürnberg Ostalbkreis Metropolregion Metropolregion Stuttgart München Metropolkongress Stuttgart, 22. Januar 2019, Landrat Klaus Pavel Seite 1 Was braucht der ländliche Raum am Rande einer Metropolregion? Erstklassige Infrastrukturanbindung in Zentren und darüber hinaus! Auf Straße und Schiene Ausbau B29 Engpassbeseitigung, Weiterführung Richtung Landesgrenze Bayern Neues, aufgewertetes SPNV-Angebot ab Juni 2019 Zeitgemäße moderne Fahrzeuge, Durchgehender Halbstundentakt im SPNV (kommunal mitfinanziert) Innovative Mobilitätskonzepte im Kreis: BMBF-Forschungsprojekt zu engagementbasierter Mobilität vor Ort: „KOMOBIL 2035“, Verkehrssicherheitsprojekt fiftyFifty-Taxi Metropolkongress Stuttgart, 22. Januar 2019, Landrat Klaus Pavel Seite 2 Taktik der Region: Fordern und Fördern Fördern durch… Jagstbahn • Vernetzung relevanter Akteure mit Richtung Regionalverband Nürnberg → IG Schienenkorridor S-N → IG Brenzbahn Richtung Ulm → „Schwaben-Express“ nach M Aalen Riesbahn Fordern durch… Richtung • Lobbyarbeit bei Bund und Land • Einsatz für Angebotsverbesserung Remsbahn München und Infrastrukturausbau, bspw. Richtung schneller Anschluss nach Berlin Stuttgart Erfolge bislang… Brenzbahn • Halbstundentakt Stuttgart-Aalen Richtung Ulm • Deutliche Verbesserung Bahn von Aalen über DON nach München Metropolkongress Stuttgart, 22. Januar 2019, Landrat Klaus Pavel Seite 3 Prosperierende Verdichtungsräume lassen Pendlerströme wachsen Auspendler Ostalbkreis Einpendler 28.000 Auspendler, aber auch
    [Show full text]
  • Bewerbungsbroschüre-Teil 2.Pdf
    Das Mühlenviertel zwischen Steilhang und Ludwigsburger Straße soll städtebaulich und freiraumplanerisch umstrukturiert und neugestaltet werden. Hierzu erfolgte bereits ein städte- baulicher Wettbewerb. Ziel ist die Aufwertung des Ortseingangs durch einen attraktiven Stadteingangsplatz mit Aufenthalts- charakter. Die Planung soll in Einklang mit dem Neubau eines Fabrikverkauf-Gebäudes der ansässigen Lederfabrik Oehler erfolgen. Durch eine neue Fußgängerüberquerung bzw. -unterquerung der Landesstraße L1100 (Ludwigsburger Straße) soll in Verbin- dung mit einem neuen Schrägaufzug am Hang die lang er- sehnte barrierefreie Fußwegeverbindung von der Altstadt zum Neckarufer geschaffen werden. Konzeption. Daueranlagen. 49 Marbach am Neckar. Neckarwiese. Die Marbacher Neckaraue ist bereits heute das Naherholungs- gebiet der Marbacher und nicht nur durch den ansässigen Biergarten und die Vereinsgebäude des Rudervereins und des Kanuclubs ein beliebtes Ausflugsziel. Das Naturdenkmal „Fischerwert“ ist als Relikt eines natürlichen Auwaldes ein be- deutender Lebensraum für die lokale Flora und Fauna und unbedingt erhaltenswert. Eine neue Fußwegebrücke bei der Schleuse über den Neckar könnte in Verbindung mit einer evtl. neuen Seilbahn den Marbacher und Benninger Bürgerinnen und Bürgern sowie Besucherinnen und Besuchern, die über den Neckartalradweg ankommen, ganz neue Möglichkeiten der Mobilität eröffnen. Es wird angestrebt die Brücke im Zusammenhang mit der geplanten Verlängerung der Schleuse umzusetzen. So könnte man nun fußläufig und barrierefrei innerhalb kürzester Zeit vom Schul- und Sportzentrum über den Literaturpark und die Schillerhöhe bis zum Benninger Neckarufer gelangen und umgekehrt. Die Neckarinsel soll dabei als Rückzugsort für die Natur belassen werden. Zusätzlich zur evtl. Seilbahn soll auch ein neuer Fußweg südwestlich des Schiller-National- museums die Schillerhöhe mit der Neckaraue verbinden. Die strukturarmen Wiesenflächen in der Aue sollen durch die Neupflanzung von Bäumen aufgewertet werden.
    [Show full text]