17 Numarali Kirim Şer'iyye Sicili (H. 1084-1085/M. 1673-1674)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

17 Numarali Kirim Şer'iyye Sicili (H. 1084-1085/M. 1673-1674) T.C. SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ 17 NUMARALI KIRIM ŞER’İYYE SİCİLİ (H. 1084-1085/M. 1673-1674) TRANSKRİPSİYONU VE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Şahin KILINÇ Enstitü Anabilim Dalı : Tarih Enstitü Bilim Dalı : Yeniçağ Anabilim Dalı Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. Yücel ÖZTÜRK ARALIK – 2019 ÖNSÖZ Osmanlı Devleti’ne bağlı olan Kırım Hanlığı’nın en önemli yerel kaynaklarından birisi şer’iyye sicilleridir. Bölge halkı hakkında bilgi vermesi, ekonomik unsurları aydınlatması, idari, hukuki, etnik, dini ve mimari vb. alanlarda bilgileri muhtevasında barındırması kaynağı özel kılan unsurlardır. Çalışmamız da Kırım şer’iyye sicillerinden bir yıllık dönemi içeren 17 numaralı (H. 1084-1085/M.1673-1674) defterin transkripsiyonu ve değerlendirilmesi üzerinedir. Tez konusunun belirlenmesi, kaynağın temin edilmesi ve yazılma sürecinde ortaya çıkan birçok sorunda desteğini ve yardımlarını esirgemeyen danışman hocam Prof. Dr. Yücel ÖZTÜRK’e teşekkürlerimi sunarım. Lisans döneminde derslerinde bulunma şerefine nâil olduğum ve akademik anlamda gelişmeme katkıda bulunan hocam Prof. Dr. Mehmet ALPARGU’ya şükranlarımı iletiyorum. Çalışma süresince desteklerini ve yardımlarını hiçbir zaman esirgemeyen Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Fırat YAŞA ve Sema AKTAŞ SARI’ya teşekkür etmeyi kendime borç bilirim. Son olarak Eğitim hayatımda desteklerini ve inançlarını esirgemeyen aileme ve dostlarıma büyük bir zevkle teşekkür ediyorum. Şahin KILINÇ 24/12/2019 İÇİNDEKİLER İÇİNDEKİLER ................................................................................................................ i KISALTMALAR ........................................................................................................... iv TABLOLAR LİSTESİ ................................................................................................... v ÖZET .............................................................................................................................. vi ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. vii GİRİŞ ............................................................................................................................... 1 BÖLÜM 1: BELGELERİN TANITIMI ....................................................................... 5 BÖLÜM 2: KIRIM HANLIĞI’NIN COĞRAFYASI VE TARİHİ ......................... 12 2.1. Kırım’ın Coğrafyası ................................................................................................. 12 2.2. Kırım Hanlığı’nın Tarihi ......................................................................................... 13 2.2.1. Altınordu’nun Kuruluşu ve Parçalanması Sonrasında Oluşan Durum.......... 13 2.2.2. Kırım Hanlığı’nın Kuruluşu ve Osmanlı Himayesine Girişi ........................ 15 2.2.3. XVI. Yüzyılda Kırım Hanlığı’nın Siyasi Tarihi ........................................... 19 2.2.4. XVII. Yüzyılda Kırım Hanlığı’nın Siyasi Tarihi .......................................... 24 2.2.5. XVIII. Yüzyılda Kırım Hanlığı’nın Siyasi Tarihi ve Rusya Tarafından İlhak Edilmesi ......................................................................................................... 27 BÖLÜM 3: 17 NUMARALI KIRIM ŞER’İYYE SİCİLİNE ( H.1084-1085/ M. 1673-1674) GÖRE KIRIM’DA İDARİ YAPILANMA ............................................. 31 3.1. Kazalar ..................................................................................................................... 31 3.2. Kasabalar ................................................................................................................. 32 3.3. Köyler ...................................................................................................................... 33 3.4. Mahalleler ................................................................................................................ 35 3.5. Coğrafi Mevki, Cami ve Mescit .............................................................................. 36 BÖLÜM 4: 17 NUMARALI KIRIM ŞER’İYYE SİCİLİNE ( H.1084-1085/ M. 1673-1674) GÖRE KIRIM’DA ETNİK VE SOSYAL YAPI ................................... 38 4.1. Etnik Yapı ................................................................................................................ 38 4.1.1. Tatarlar .......................................................................................................... 38 i 4.1.2. Çerkesler........................................................................................................ 39 4.1.3. Kıptiler .......................................................................................................... 40 4.1.4. Acemler ......................................................................................................... 40 4.1.5. Yahudiler ....................................................................................................... 41 4.1.6. Ermeniler ....................................................................................................... 42 4.2. Suç ve Suçlu ............................................................................................................ 44 4.2.1. Darp ve Şiddet ............................................................................................... 45 4.2.2. Hırsızlık ......................................................................................................... 47 4.2.3. Hakaret ve Sövme ......................................................................................... 48 4.2.4. Mal-Mülk Zapt Etme ..................................................................................... 49 4.2.5. Dolandırıcılık ................................................................................................ 50 4.3. Aile .......................................................................................................................... 51 4.3.1. Evlilik ............................................................................................................ 52 4.3.2. Boşanma ........................................................................................................ 54 4.3.3. Nafaka ........................................................................................................... 56 4.3.4. Miras.............................................................................................................. 58 4.3.5. Vekâlet Etme ................................................................................................. 61 4.4. Köleliğin Sosyal ve Ekonomik Boyutları ................................................................ 62 4.4.1. Köle Tasvirleri............................................................................................... 63 4.4.2. Köle Ticareti ve Maddi Değeri...................................................................... 64 4.4.3. Kaçak Köle .................................................................................................... 66 4.4.4. Köle Azat Etme Yöntemleri .......................................................................... 67 4.5. Unvanlar ve Lakaplar .............................................................................................. 70 BÖLÜM 5: 17 NUMARALI KIRIM ŞER’İYYE SİCİLİNE ( H.1084-1085/ M. 1673-1674) GÖRE KIRIM’IN EKONOMİK YAPISI .............................................. 71 5.1. Para .......................................................................................................................... 71 5.2. Ölçü Birimleri .......................................................................................................... 72 5.3. Tarımcılık ve Tarım Alanları ................................................................................... 74 5.4. Hayvancılık ve Hayvan Türleri ............................................................................... 77 5.5. Meslekler ................................................................................................................. 80 5.6. Alım-Satım .............................................................................................................. 82 5.6.1. Ev Satışları .................................................................................................... 82 ii 5.6.2. Tarım Alanı Satışı ......................................................................................... 83 5.6.3. Dükkân Satışı ................................................................................................ 84 5.6.4. Diğer Ürünlerin Ticareti ................................................................................ 85 5.7. Alacak-Verecek ....................................................................................................... 86 5.7.1. Kefil Olma ..................................................................................................... 87 5.7.2. Rehin Verme ................................................................................................. 88 5.7.3. Borcu Vade Etme .......................................................................................... 89 5.8. Maddi Kültür ........................................................................................................... 90 5.8.1. Giyim Kuşam ................................................................................................ 90 5.8.2. Alet Edevat .................................................................................................... 91 5.8.3. Hane İçindeki Eşyalar ..................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Pa³ac Chanów Krymskich W Bachczysaraju Publikacja Pod Honorowym Patronatem
    Pa³ac chanów krymskich w Bachczysaraju Publikacja pod honorowym patronatem GRZEGORZA DZIKA Konsula Honorowego Ukrainy we Wrocławiu Elwis Osmanow Pa³ac chanów krymskich w Bachczysaraju Przełożył z języka rosyjskiego Musa Çaxarxan Czachorowski Çaxarxan Xucalıq Wrocław 1437/2016 Tytuł oryginału: ХAНСKИЙ ДВOРЕЦ – AРХИTЕKTУРНO-ИСTOРИЧЕСKAЯ ДOMИНAНTA БAХЧИСAРAЯ Recenzent: Prof. dr hab. Selim Mirza Chazbijewicz Redakcja: Mgr Daniel St. Czachorowski Konsultacja w zakresie języka krymskotatarskiego: Prof. dr hab. Henryk Jankowski Korekta: Dr Barbara Pawlic-Miśkiewicz Wydawcy: Inicjatywa Wydawnicza Çaxarxan Xucalıq * Wrocław Selim Mirza Chazbijewicz * Iza Melika Czechowska * Musa Çaxarxan Czachorowski Muzułmański Związek Religijny w RP Najwyższe Kolegium Muzułmańskie ul. Piastowska 13 F * 15-027 Białystok Copyright by Wydawcy&Autor, 1437/2016 Wydanie pierwsze ISBN 978-83-64358-28-9 Skład, druk, oprawa: Agencja Wydawnicza „Argi” s.c. 50-542 Wrocław, ul. Żegiestowska 11 www.argi.pl Przyczynek do tatarskiej historii ontakty Korony Polskiej z Tatarami z Krymu zaczęły się jeszcze Kprzed powstaniem tamtejszego chanatu. Z czasem zacieśniły się i trwały przez stulecia. W wieku XX ostatnim ich akordem było uczestnictwo polskich Tatarów w formowaniu Krymskiej Republi- ki Ludowej w latach 1917–1919. Osaczone przez bolszewicką Ro- sję władze krymskie poprzez polskiego przedstawiciela w Szwaj- carii zwróciły się do Ligi Narodów o udzielenie Polsce mandatu nad Krymem. W cza sach najnowszych nasi Tatarzy i działacze niepodległościowi wspierają ruch narodowo-wyzwoleńczy Tata- rów Krymskich i pomagają uchodźcom z Krymu. Ale tak naprawdę, to bardzo mało wiemy o krymskotatarskiej historii, o dziejach Chanatu Krymskiego, jego mieszkańcach i za- bytkach. W efekcie pokutuje dość ogóle przekonanie o niskim stopniu rozwoju tatarskiego społeczeństwa, którego jedynym za- jęciem miały być łupieżcze wyprawy na sąsiednie kraje.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Art and Architecture in the European Periphery Crimea, Caucasus, and the Volga-Ural Region
    Islamic Art and Architecture in the European Periphery Crimea, Caucasus, and the Volga-Ural Region Edited by Barbara Kellner-Heinkele, Joachim Gierlichs, and Brigitte Heuer 2008 Harrassowitz Verlag . Wiesbaden ISSN 05674980 ISBN 978-344705753-0 Contents Preface.................................................................................................................. 9 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 11 List of Figures ...................................................................................................... 13 Joachim Gierlichs Neglected Research Topics – Some Remarks ...................................................... 21 Ukraine Yuriy Boltryk and Svitlana Bilyayeva Investigations of Akkerman Fortress.................................................................... 35 Svitlana Bilyayeva and Bozkurt Ersoy Monuments of the Ottoman Period in the Ukraine: Archaeological Investigations (1989–2004)......................................................... 39 Ninel Bokii, Irina Kozyr, and Tatyana Pozywei A Golden Horde Complex in Podolia................................................................... 45 Bozkurt Ersoy The Inventory Project of Turkish Monuments in the Ukraine and Examples from the Crimea ............................................................................ 49 Đnci Kuyulu Ersoy Ottoman Cultural Heritage in the Ukraine............................................................ 53 Crimea Elena Aibabina Monumental
    [Show full text]
  • Complexity of Archaeological Research and Natural Scientific Studies in Identifying the Location of Ashlama-Saray, the Countrypalace of the Crimean Khans
    Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana ISSN: 1315-5216 ISSN: 2477-9555 [email protected] Universidad del Zulia Venezuela Complexity of archaeological research and natural scientific studies in identifying the location of Ashlama-Saray, the countrypalace of the Crimean Khans BOCHAROV, S.G; ATYPOV, N.R; SITDIKOV, A.G; FAHRUTDINOV, R.R Complexity of archaeological research and natural scientific studies in identifying the location of Ashlama-Saray, the countrypalace of the Crimean Khans Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, vol. 24, núm. Esp.5, 2019 Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=27962050002 Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Internacional. PDF generado a partir de XML-JATS4R por Redalyc Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto S.G BOCHAROV, et al. Complexity of archaeological research and natural scientific studies in ident... Artículos Complexity of archaeological research and natural scientific studies in identifying the location of Ashlama-Saray, the countrypalace of the Crimean Khans Complejidad de la investigación arqueológica y estudios científicos naturales para identificar la ubicación de Ashlama-Saray, palacio de los Khans de Crimea S.G BOCHAROV Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa? Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Rusia id=27962050002 [email protected] ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4775-4136 N.R ATYPOV Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Rusia [email protected] ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2513-4545 A.G SITDIKOV Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Rusia [email protected] ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-8031 R.R FAHRUTDINOV Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Rusia [email protected] ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6565-9207 Recepción: 05 Septiembre 2019 Aprobación: 19 Octubre 2019 Resumen: El artículo se centra en los resultados de la búsqueda del sitio arqueológico - Ashlama-Saray - palacio de los Khans de Crimea.
    [Show full text]
  • BAHÇESARAY İBRAGİMOVA, Aliye UKRAYNA/UKRAINE/УКРАИНА Kırk-Yer: Is the Castle in Mountain Remote District
    1631 BAHÇESARAY İBRAGİMOVA, Aliye UKRAYNA/UKRAINE/УКРАИНА Kırk-yer: Is the castle in mountain remote district. It was the residence with extensive economic structure of the feudal nobility. castle was built in the XIVth century. It was situated on the mountain Plato between rivers Kacha and Alma, occupying territory from the west part of old Bahçesaray (at the place of modern station) and to the natural boundary nowadays called Eski-yurt. Kırk-yer was important economic center that included eastern markets, workshops, caravan- seraies (motels), pastures and cemeteries. From the early Tatar period on the Plato chufut-Kale kept two buildings - the ruins of the mosque (stone dated 1397 year of Hijra) and canike Hanım Türbe (date of death -841 Y. H.). At the bottom part of city was found cemetery of Tekie Gazi-Mansur. Also was localized the place of Gazi-Mansur Sultans, Sheikh-Halil and Sheikh-Ramazan burials. Salachik: like the others works of the earlier crimean Tatar architecture in crimea, medrese at Salacık represents reduced and simplified variant of the Asia Minors Seljuk medrese. close to the medrese there is Hacı Geray’s Türbe that was built by his son, Mengli Geray in 1501 A.D. Its architecture is similar to Türbe on the Plato Kırk-Yer; On plan Türbe represents an octahedron, each side of it repeated outside – 3,81 m, inside from side to opposite side – 5,91 m, the depth of the portal is 2,33 m, width – 5,24 m. Height of the wall to a socle – 0,85 m. Inside, at the left part from the entrance there is a niche in a wall with 60 cm.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Art and Architecture in the European Periphery
    Islamic Art and Architecture in the European Periphery Crimea, Caucasus, and the Volga-Ural Region Bearbeitet von Barbara Kellner-Heinkele, Joachim Gierlichs, Brigitte Heuer 1. Auflage 2009. Buch. 297 S. ISBN 978 3 447 05753 0 Format (B x L): 17 x 24 cm Gewicht: 460 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Kunst, Architektur, Design > Architektur: Allgemeines Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Islamic Art and Architecture in the European Periphery Crimea, Caucasus, and the Volga-Ural Region Edited by Barbara Kellner-Heinkele, Joachim Gierlichs, and Brigitte Heuer 2008 Harrassowitz Verlag . Wiesbaden ISSN 05674980 ISBN 978-344705753-0 Contents Preface.................................................................................................................. 9 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 11 List of Figures ...................................................................................................... 13 Joachim Gierlichs Neglected Research Topics – Some Remarks ...................................................... 21 Ukraine Yuriy Boltryk and Svitlana Bilyayeva
    [Show full text]
  • UDC 72.03 (477.75) Privolneva SA, St .Lec.. KKTD., National Aviation
    UDC 72.03 (477.75) Privolneva S.A., st .lec.. KKTD., National Aviation University, Ukraine ARTISTIC TRADITION AS THE FACTOR OF THE FORMATION OF THE MODERN CRIMEAN TATAR ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN Abstract: In the article are considered the Crimean Tatar (C.T.) architectural and artistic traditions, which are used in modern conditions. There are analyzed the architecture and design of modern C.T. cafes and restaurants, in which such traditions were embodied most organically. There was predicted the evolution of the C.T. architecture with the active use of products of the folk art. Keywords: The contemporary Crimean Tatar architecture, artistic traditions, design, folk crafts. Statement of the problem. Important component of modern Crimean Tatar culture is an architectural work - a vivid manifestation of national identity. For its fruitful development becomes a prerequisite knowledge and understanding of artistic traditions of the Crimean Tatar people, as well as a critical analysis of the practical use of these traditions in contemporary architecture and design. Analysis of recent research and publications. Understanding the artistic traditions of the Crimean Tatar architecture is impossible without knowledge of the conditions of its formation as a "truly scientific analysis of any historical phenomenon leads to reliable results only when it is launched from the origins of this phenomenon" [1, p.5]. The problem of the genesis of the Crimean Tatar architecture is still far from being solved, as insufficiently studied sources of its formation, the relationship of architectural and artistic traditions of the Turkic world. Also very ambiguous interpretation of the genesis of the Tatars, the region of their settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Akdeniz Adalarına Sürgün Edilen Kırım Hanları Crimean Khans
    DOI: 10.13114/MJH.2018.401 Geliş Tarihi: 04.04.2018 Mediterranean Journal of Humanities Kabul Tarihi: 24.06.2018 mjh.akdeniz.edu.tr VIII/1 (2018) 355-366 Akdeniz Adalarına Sürgün Edilen Kırım Hanları Crimean Khans Exiled to the Mediterranean Islands Özge TOGRAL Öz: Kırım hanlarının Akdeniz adalarına sürgün edilmesi konusu, Kırım Hanlığı’nın Osmanlı Devleti’nin himayesi altına alınması tâbilik-metbûluk ilişkisi bağlamında ele alınmıştır. Osmanlı Devleti, Kırım Hanlığı tahtına geçecek hanın belirlenmesi gibi durumlarda müdahale etmiştir. Bilhassa Osmanlı siyasetine uyum sağlamayan hanların tayin ve azillerinde Osmanlı Devleti’nin kararı etkili olduğu gibi azledilen hanların nerede ikamet edeceği konusunda da yine padişah kararı etkili olmuştur. Azledilen Hanlar, Kırım’da iç karışıklıklara neden olma ihtimalinden dolayı sürgün edilmişlerdir. Azledilen hanlar dışında kalgay ve nureddîn makamında bulunan hanlık mensuplarının da sürgün edilmesi söz konusudur. Özellikle Rodos başta olmak üzere çeşitli Akdeniz adalarına sürgün edilmiştir. Sürgün sebebi ise Hanlık idare merkezine uzak olması ve dış dünya ile olan ilişkileri kontrol altında tutmanın ada yaşantısıyla daha kolay olabileceği fikri etkilidir. Söz konusu yapılan çalışma dahilinde, Akdeniz adalarına sürgün edilen Kırım Hanları hakkında bilgi vererek, sürgün nedenleri ve sürgün sırasındaki uygulamalar Osmanlı Arşiv belgeleri ışığında ve çeşitli araştırma ve inceleme eserleri incelenerek değerlendirilecektir. Anahtar sözcükler: Akdeniz, Kırım Hanlığı, Sürgün, Osmanlı Devleti Abstract: The the exile Crimean khans to the Mediterranean islands, under the auspices of the Ottoman Empire, shows the Crimean Khanate was dealt with in the context of the relationship of loyalty – domination. For this reason the intervention of the Ottoman State in the Crimean Khanate, in particular, the decision of the sultan was influential in the appointment and dismissal of those khans who did not fit in with Ottoman politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials in Archaeology, History and Ethnography of Tauria
    MATERIALS IN ARCHAEOLOGY, HISTORY AND ETHNOGRAPHY OF TAURIA 1990 Vol. I Aibabin A.I. The Chronology of Crimean Cemeteries in the Late Roman and Early Mediaeval Periods Gertsen A.G. The Ensemble of Fortifications of Mangup Khrapunov I.N. On the Reasons of the Fall of Several Late Scythian Settlements Achkinazi I.V. On the Problem of the Ethnogenesis of the Krymchaks in the Soviet Scholarship 1991 Vol. II Archaeology Khrapunov I.N. The Late Scythian Settlement of Bulganak (According to the 1981–1989 Excavations) Nikolaenko G.M. The Srednii Peninsula within the Allotment System at the Near Chora of Tauric Chersonese from the Fourth to Second Centuries BC Zin’ko V.N. On the Ethnosocial Stratification of the Farming Population in European Part of Bosporos in the Fourth and third Centuries BC Aibabin A.I. The Main Stages of the History of the Fortfied Settlement of Eski-Kermen Mogarichev Iu.M. The Early Cave Structures of Chufut-Kale Sazanov A.V. The Complex of Amphorae from the First Quarter of the Seventh Century AD from the North-Eastern Area of Chersonese Prikhodniuk O.M., Shovkoplias A.M., Ol’govskaia S.Ia, Struina T.A. The Martynivka Treasure Aibabina E.A. Kashi Ceramic Ware from Kaffa History Petrova E.B. Theodosia as a Part of the Bosporan Kingdom (Political Aspect) Sidorenko V.A. The “Goths” of Procopius of Caesarea’s Land of Dory and “Long Walls” in the Crimea Gertsen A.G., Mogarichev Iu.M. On the Appearance of the Gothic Eparchy in Taurica Nikiforov A.R. The Problems of the Socioeconomic History of the Genoese Colonial Towns in the Crimea in the Soviet Scholarship Vikhnovich V.L., Lebedev V.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Apperception of Sufism: Sociocultural Background (Evidence from the Crimean Ulus of the Golden Horde)
    How to Cite: Chernysheva, E. V. (2021). Apperception of Sufism: sociocultural background (evidence from the Crimean ulus of the golden horde). Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 401- 414. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS2.1362 Apperception of Sufism: Sociocultural Background (Evidence from the Crimean Ulus of the Golden Horde) Elena V. Chernysheva Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University named after Fevzi Yakubov, Simferopol, Russian Federation Abstract---The study states that the spread of Sufi teachings in Crimea in the 13th-15th centuries should be considered as a display of the continuous recursiveness of spiritual culture. The prerequisites for apperception are developing as a result of the formation of an institutional matrix, the basis of which was the union of the so-called nomadic empires and Hellenistic states. Maintenance of the Khazar heritage, the impact of the Hellenistic culture, and recursive practice contributed to the spread of Sufism. The atmosphere of the Golden Horde became a certain “fertiliser” for the establishment of the social structure and development of the spiritual life of the medieval Turkic world. The research highlights the specifics of Jochid rulers’ attitude towards Christians. The study describes the role of the first Muslim rulers in the development of new religious traditions of the state, the spread of the Arab-Muslim educational model in the Crimean ulus, the impact of Sufi brotherhoods on the socio-cultural development of Crimea and the influence of prominent Sufis on the ruling elite. In conclusion, the apperception of Sufism is an organic, tradition-based perception of doctrine as the basis of the medieval Crimea’s ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Girays' Displacement Into
    THE SULTANS OF THE COUNTRYSIDE: THE GIRAYS’ DISPLACEMENT INTO OTTOMAN RUMELI AND THEIR WIDESPREAD ROLES IN NETWORKS OF VIOLENCE (1792-1807) By Muhammet Mazı Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Tolga U. Esmer Second Reader: Jan Hennings CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary June 2020 THE SULTANS OF THE COUNTRYSIDE: THE GIRAYS’ DISPLACEMENT INTO OTTOMAN RUMELI AND THEIR WIDESPREAD ROLES IN NETWORKS OF VIOLENCE (1792-1807) By Muhammet Mazı Turkey Thesis submitted to the Department of History, Central European University, Budapest, with a partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner ____________________________________________ CEU eTD Collection Examiner Budapest June 2020 ii Statement of Copyright Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection iii Abstract After the fall of the Crimean Khanate in 1783, the majority of the Giray dynasty was forced to settle in the Ottoman Balkans. Their immigration to Rumeli impacted the region in profound ways, and its repercussions reverberated beyond that province throughout the Selimian era (1789-1807).
    [Show full text]
  • Rocznik Tatarski 4 2017 Wersja 2.Indd
    Rocznik Tatarów Polskich seria 2 Czasopismo naukowe i literacko-społeczne poświęcone historii, kulturze oraz teraźniejszości Tatarów w Polsce i Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej Tom IV (XVIII) Muzułmański Związek Religijny w RP Najwyższe Kolegium Muzułmańskie 2017 (1438/39) JAN TYSZKIEWICZ: Dwie mapy arabskie z XI i XII w. ... 3 1397–2017 620 lat osadnictwa tatarskiego w Wielkim Księstwie Litewskim 4 I. ARTYKUŁY I ROZPRAWY Rocznik Tatarów Polskich seria 2 │ Tom IV (XVIII) 5 SPIS TREŚCI Słowo wstępne ..................................................................................................... 9 I. Artykuły i rozprawy ..................................................................................... 13 Jan Tyszkiewicz: Dwie mapy arabskie z XI i XII w. obejmujące obszar Słowiańszczyzny Zachodniej i Wschodniej .................................................. 13 Michał Pędracki: Tengryzm – dawna religia ludów Wielkiego Stepu ............ 29 Dokumenty z tajnych archiwów .......................................................................... 53 Joanna Kulwicka-Kamińska: 620 lat Tatarów w historii, religii i kulturze Białorusi, Litwy i Polski ............................................................................... 75 Michał Łyszczarz: Specyfi ka medialnego dyskursu dotyczącego islamu i muzułmanów w Polsce ................................................................................ 91 II. Tatarzy w Europie Wschodniej .............................................................. 109 Эльвис Османов: Культовые памятники Эски-Юрта
    [Show full text]
  • T.C. EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ Yeni Çağ Tarihi Anabilim Dalı
    T.C. EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ Yeni Çağ Tarihi Anabilim Dalı OSMANLI YÖNETİMİNDE KIRIM (1600-1774) DOKTORA TEZİ Ömer BIYIK Tezi Hazırlayan DANIŞMAN: M. Akif ERDOĞRU İZMİR-2007 Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürlüğüne sunduğum Osmanlı Yönetiminde Kırım (1600-1774) adlı doktora tezinin tarafımdan bilimsel, ahlak ve normlara uygun bir şekilde hazırlandığını, tezimde yararlandığım kaynakları bibliyografyada ve dipnotlarda gösterdiğimi onurumla doğrularım. Ömer BIYIK İÇİNDEKİLER Önsöz. ........................................................................................................................I Kısaltmalar .................................................................................................................II Tablolar Listesi ..........................................................................................................IV Kaynaklar ...................................................................................................................X Giriş............................................................................................................................1 Kırım Yarımadasının Tarihçesi..................................................................................1 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM İDARİ YAPI A) Kırım’ın Osmanlı Yönetimine Girmesi ve Bölgenin Coğrafi Sınırları’nın Belirlenmesi......................................................................................12 1. Kefe Eyaleti...................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]