DOCSLIB.ORG

Not for Publication by Virtue of Paragraph 8 of Part 1 Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Not for Publication by Virtue of Paragraph 8 of Part 1 Of Portfolio Holder for Safer Communities and Item Licensing 09 March 2017 Report of Strategic Director for Commercial and Author Paul Wilkinson Place ℡ 282787 Title Response to the Consultation on the A120 Braintree to A12 Improvement Wards All wards affected but phyiscally Marks Tey and Layer affected This report concerns Colchester Borough Council’s response to the consultation on the A120 Braintree to A12 Improvement 1. Decision(s) Required 1.1 To respond to the consultation on the A120 Braintree to A12 Improvement 1.1 To submit to Essex County Council this report and questionnaire based on section 5 of this report. 2. Reasons for Decision(s) 2.1 The consultation concerns investment in the strategic trunk road network which runs through Colchester Borough. The A120 is essential to supporting competitive economic and housing growth across the borough and region. Colchester has supported study work by the Haven Gateway Partnership articulating the need for the investment and local economic benefits it can bring. The widening has been identified in the Local Plan and this is an opportunity to influence the design to fit with the Local Plan aspirations. 3. Alternative Options 3.1 Not responding is an option, however this is key infrastructure to support growth and the project needs to be supported to ensure that the scheme is included in the national Roads Investment Strategy. 3.2 Selection of an alternative option: ECC presented 5 route options (see appendix A) for the A120 and the choice of option B or C with modification best fits with the growth and strategic role of the A120 and reduction of through traffic in Marks Tey. 4. Supporting Information 4.1 The A120 is between the A12 at Marks Tey and Braintree is currently a single carriageway route carrying approximately 25,000 vehicles per day. The route is characterised by local communities fronting the route, local accesses, junctions with B Roads and rural lanes and is of varying width; down to 6m in Marks Tey. Excepting the Coggeshall Bypass the A120 is straight following the alignment of Stane Street Roman Road. 4.2 For the user the journey time is unreliable and with evening peak speeds being 22mph slower and 14 minutes longer than the free flow conditions. The A120 joins the A12 at Marks Tey junction 25 – this junction is one of the major pinch points that hold up users along the route. The mixed function of the route creates issues with deliveries, waste collection and such like stopping in the carriageway, not allowing vehicles to pass. Over the period 2011 to 2015 there were 172 collisions resulting in 266 casualties. Up to 15% of the traffic is Heavy Goods vehicles and 68% of the traffic is long distance traffic. 4.3 For those living along the route the traffic movements dominate, with poor and narrow footways and limited facilities for cyclists. The close proximity of the road to the dwellings in Marks Tey detracts from the quality of the area. 4.4 The A120 is actually part of the strategic trunk road network managed by Highways England. It is substandard and does not perform its strategic trunk road function especially through Marks Tey. To the east the A120 provides access to the port of Harwich and in the west to Stansted Airport. The route has been the subject of previous studies and inclusion in funding programmes. The improvement to the route has been identified in the Colchester Local Plan adopted 2008 as requiring investment to support growth. 4.5 The Haven Gateway partnership coordinated a campaign to lobby for the development of a solution for the A120 producing the “The Case for the A120 Enterprise Corridor” which set out the inter-relationship between economic growth and improvements to the A120 corridor and how business could benefit. The partnership commissioned “The A120 Economic Study” in 2013 demonstrated that investment in the A120 would improve the productivity of the area by up to £1.3bn (gross value added), through increased employment opportunities through widening the employment pool and improved access to jobs. 4.6 Essex County Council took the decision to fund these design stages for improving the A120 following national design standards. The aim for ECC, following consultation is to select a route and make recommendation to the Secretary of State for Transport in autumn 2017. The expectation is that the scheme will then be considered for inclusion in the next national Road Investment Strategy covering the period 2020 to 2025. 4.7 The consultation material has been made available on line at a120essex.co.uk . During the consultation period 11 public events were organised in the corridor. The 5 options are shown in appendix A. It should be noted that most of the physical route is within the Braintree District, but with traffic reduction benefits to those Colchester Borough communities along the A120 Stane Street including Marks Tey, Little Tey and Broad Green. 4.8 The new route would be developed and constructed to meet the national guidelines for a strategic road as a dual carriageway with grade separated junctions, advanced technology and 70mph speed limit. It would be of a similar quality to the section west of Braintree to the M11 at Stansted. Relationship with the Garden Community 4.9 The area for the potential Garden Community, in the vicinity of Marks Tey, currently straddles the existing A120. Over the long term, this community could grow to approximately 20,000 dwellings with employment and other opportunities. This will help deliver on the Government’s aim to address the national shortfall in housing. 4.10 An objective of the A120 scheme is to support housing and economic growth. Even though the traffic growth forecasts allow for housing growth, the options have been developed independently from the ideas for the Garden Community in the Marks Tey area. This has allowed ECC to focus on developing a highway options but ECC do accept the design could be influenced by a Garden Community and equally, will affect decisions on the location and layout of a Garden Community. Traffic Flows, Growth and Junctions 4.11 The A120 is forecast to carry a high level of traffic in the future - 43,000 vehicles per day in 2026. North of a new junction with the A12, the A12 could carry 110,000 vehicles per day. Currently the new A120/A12 junction is envisaged to be a two level grade separated junction. With Garden Community traffic the design of junctions may need to be large; possibly 3 level grade separation and or include some form of “free flow” slip road arrangements. This would require increased land take in the area of the garden community. 4.12 The new junction with the A12 and A120 could also serve the Garden Community but would be large. The consultation highlighted that the exact location of the new A12 and A120 junction could be located within a 1.5km stretch of road. Colchester Borough Council believes that the junction should be located to optimise the development of the Garden Community. The route could then in part follow the pylon line which runs across the area. This would suggest the junction is further from Marks Tey. The exact scale of the junction and links need further detailed engineering and traffic modelling assessment. 4.13 Essex County Council are closely involved with the Garden Communities proposals and therefore the next design phases will need to take into consideration the potential Garden Communities growth and inform the land requirements. 4.14 At the western end the options either connect back into Galleys Corner or south of Braintree. ECC suggest that either location can technically work with diversion of local connections. Connecting to the south of Braintree extends the length and cost of the scheme requiring a new crossing of the Braintree Witham branch line and the River Brain. Intermediate Junctions 4.15 ECC have sought views on the need and location for an intermediate junction. In traffic management terms it would not be unusual to connect a B road into an A road. Options B and C cross the B1024 between Coggeshall and Kelvedon. A junction with the new road would give these villages better access but without further infrastructure would also draw traffic from the surrounding rural areas through them. 4.16 Rather than have a junction with the B1024 a junction could be provided to serve a potential Garden community with a link back to Stane Street to the east of Coggeshall. Stane Street and Junction 25 Marks Tey 4.17 The options reduce the through traffic in Marks Tey along Stane Street (A120). The through strategic traffic will reroute and use the A12 and through junction 25. There could be opportunities to the change the layout and arrangements of Stane Street and junction 25 to better reflect the new traffic patterns. This could include ensuring Stane Street is not used as a through route, gives greater priority to local movements, public transport, walking and cycling. At the junction ways in which the Marks Tey communities either side of the A12 can be reconnected to each other should be investigated. Selection of an Option 4.18 In considering which option to select the following issues should be considered: • How each option (with modification) can fit with the proposed Garden Community • How each option provide benefits to Marks Tey as result of a reduction in through traffic • How each option provides a strategic route to support the wider growth of north Essex and Haven Gateway • How each options improve the journey time and reliability of the route • How each options fit with the A12 proposals and minimise the widening of the A12.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Assessment Report Volume 1 B3553T41-JAC-EGN-00-REP-EN-0001 | P00.1 24/11/16
    A120 Braintree to A12 Essex County Council Environmental Assessment Report Volume 1 B3553T41-JAC-EGN-00-REP-EN-0001 | P00.1 24/11/16 ENVIR ONMEN TAL ASSESSM ENT R EPORT Essex C ounty Council ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 1. Purpose and structure of this report ..................................................................................................... 10 2. The scheme .............................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Need for the scheme ................................................................................................................................. 12 2.2 Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 History........................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.4 Planning policies and context .................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Aims and objectives ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • All Saints Colchester Marriages 1609-1720 (Grooms) Groom Surname Groom 1St Status Bride 1St Bride Surname Status Marriage Date Notes ? Tho
    All Saints Colchester marriages 1609-1720 (grooms) Groom surname Groom 1st Status Bride 1st Bride surname Status Marriage date Notes ? Tho. Single man Martha WOODWARD Single woman 05 Sep 1653 No groom's surname. [BR]USSE Samuell Jane BROCK 05 Sep 1677 Licence. Both of Feareing [FP]OSTER Edward Ann BARKER 15 Jun 1686 Bride of St Leonard's [LR]OWTH Ambrose Single man Sarah PURSLOW Single woman 15 Feb 1676/7 The L and R are over each other. Licence. ABBOT Gyles Widower Mary WEBB Widow 07 Mar 1697/8 Both of St Buttolph's ABEL James Anne WILLIAMS 01 Feb 1680/1 Licence. Both of St Leonard's ABLET Henry Single man Mary MILLAR Single woman 20 Feb 1701/2 Licence. Groom of S. Buttolphs, bride of Hadley ADAMS George Single man Anne SMALLEDGE Single woman 20 Feb 1678/9 A [= allegation ?]. Both of St Buttolphs ADAMS William Mary WRIGHT 31 Oct 1689 ADLER John Sara LANGHAM 15 Feb 1685/6 Licence. Both of St Leonard's AERIS George ? ? 20 Oct 1667 Groom of Sawkitt [ Salcott ?] AGAR John Phoebe GREENFEILD 25 Dec 1693 Bride of Greenstead AGNES Robert Ann TODD 07 Mar 1720/1 AILEWARD John Single man Mary BEMISH Single woman 24 Dec 1675 Licence. Both of Inworth No bride's surname. Year is given as 166 and is probably one ALAIS Petar Mary ? 03 Oct 1660 of 1660 to 1664. [ Alliss ? ]. ALCOCK James Mary FOAKES 31 Jul 1681 Both of West Marsey [ West Mersea ]. ALDERTON Anthony Single man Hannah ROGERS Single woman 31 Oct 1676 Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits Made Under S31(6) Highways Act 1980
    Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits made under s31(6) Highways Act 1980 and s15A(1) Commons Act 2006 For all enquiries about the contents of the Register please contact the: Public Rights of Way and Highway Records Manager email address: [email protected] Telephone No. 0345 603 7631 Highway Highway Commons Declaration Link to Unique Ref OS GRID Statement Statement Deeds Reg No. DISTRICT PARISH LAND DESCRIPTION POST CODES DEPOSITOR/LANDOWNER DEPOSIT DATE Expiry Date SUBMITTED REMARKS No. REFERENCES Deposit Date Deposit Date DEPOSIT (PART B) (PART D) (PART C) >Land to the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops Christopher James Harold Philpot of Stortford TL566209, C/PW To be CM22 6QA, CM22 Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton CA16 Form & 1252 Uttlesford Takeley >Land on the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops TL564205, 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated. 6TG, CM22 6ST Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4LN Plan Stortford TL567205 on behalf of Takeley Farming LLP >Land on east side of Station Road, Takeley, Bishops Stortford >Land at Newland Fann, Roxwell, Chelmsford >Boyton Hall Fa1m, Roxwell, CM1 4LN >Mashbury Church, Mashbury TL647127, >Part ofChignal Hall and Brittons Farm, Chignal St James, TL642122, Chelmsford TL640115, >Part of Boyton Hall Faim and Newland Hall Fann, Roxwell TL638110, >Leys House, Boyton Cross, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM I 4LP TL633100, Christopher James Harold Philpot of >4 Hill Farm Cottages, Bishops Stortford Road, Roxwell, CMI 4LJ TL626098, Roxwell, Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton C/PW To be >10 to 12 (inclusive) Boyton Hall Lane, Roxwell, CM1 4LW TL647107, CM1 4LN, CM1 4LP, CA16 Form & 1251 Chelmsford Mashbury, Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM14 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • Colchester Borough Council's Housing Land Supply Position July 2018
    Housing Land Supply Position Statement Colchester Borough Council’s housing land supply position J 2018 1 uly Contents Page 1. Status of Document 3 2. Local Context 3 3. National Policy 4 4. Housing Target for Colchester 6 5. Windfall Allowance 8 6. Emerging Allocations 11 7. Five Year Supply Calculation 13 8. Monitoring 14 Appendix One – Housing Trajectory 15 2 1. Status of this document 1.1 This document sets out Colchester’s housing land supply position and explains how this position complies with the requirements of national policy and guidance. 1.2 The document represents the current housing land supply position as of 1st April 2018. The relevant five year housing land supply period therefore covers the period between 1st April 2018 and 31st March 2023. 1.3 The information contained in this document is correct in respect of the time period it covers but due to the nature of housing supply and delivery it is considered to be a ‘live document’. It is therefore subject to change as and when new information is received which changes the housing supply and/or housing delivery position. 2. Local Context 2.1 Colchester Borough Council has an adopted Local Plan which consists of its Core Strategy (adopted in 2008 and subject to a Focused Review in 2014), Site Allocations DPD (adopted 2010) and Development Policies DPD (adopted 2008 and reviewed 2014). The Tiptree Jam Factory Plan DPD (2013) also forms part of the development plan. In addition there are two adopted Neighbourhood Plans within Colchester Borough in the form of the Myland and Braiswick Neighbourhood Plan and Boxted Neighbourhood Plan, both of which were adopted in 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues and Options Report
    A PLAN FOR COLCHESTER BRAINTREE BORDERS GARDEN COMMUNITY Issues and Options Report October 2017 2 CONTENTS Have your say ....................................................................................................................................................................................................4 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................................5 The purpose of this consultation.....................................................................................................................................................................5 Why is a Development Plan needed? ............................................................................................................................................................5 Why are your views important? ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 What status will the Plan Document have? ................................................................................................................................................... 7 About this Issues and Options Report ...........................................................................................................................................................8 Steps to preparing a Plan (DPD) .....................................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Essex, Herts, Middlesex Kent
    POST OFFICE DIRECTORY OF ESSEX, HERTS, MIDDLESEX KENT ; CORRECTED TO THE TIME OF PUBLICATION. r LONDON: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY KELLY AND CO,, OLD BOSWELL COURT, ST. CLEMENT'S, STRAND. W.C. 1862. PREFACE. TIIE Proprietors, in submitting to their Subscribers and the Public the present (being the Fifth) Edition of the Six HOME COUNTIES DIRECTORY, trust that it may • be found to be equal in accuracy to the previous Editions. Several additions have been made to the present volume : lists of Hundreds and Poor Law Unions have been included in the Topography of each County; it is stated under each Parish in what Hundred, Union and County Court District it is situate, as well as the Diocese, Archdeaconry and Rural Deanery; and the College and University of every Beneficed Clergyman have been given. The Post Office Savings Banks have been noticed; the names of the Parish Clerks are given under each Parish ; and lists of Farm Bailiffs of gentlemen farming their own land have been added. / The bulk of the Directory has again increased considerably: the Third Edition consisted of 1,420 pages; the Fourth had increased to 1,752 pages; and the present contains 1,986 pages. The value of the Directory, however, will depend principally on the fact that it has been most carefully corrected, every parish having been personally visited by the Agents during the last six months. The Proprietors have again to return their thanks to the Clergymen, Clerks of the Peace, Magistrates' Clerks, Registrars, and other Gentlemen who have assisted the Agents while collecting the information.
    [Show full text]
  • North Essex Garden Communities Colchester Braintree Borders Garden Community Concept Framework
    EB/026 North Essex Garden Communities Colchester Braintree Borders Garden Community Concept Framework August 2017 in association with Peter Brett Associates and David Jarvis Associates Artists perspective of the Concept Framework 2 3 Contents LIST OF FIGURES 5 North Essex Garden Employment 52 Communities Charter 31 INTRODUCTION 7 Density Strategy 54 The Rationale for CBBGC 31 The Brief and Role of the PLACEMAKING IN A GARDEN Concept Framework 7 Scale of the Opportunity 32 COMMUNITY 56 Report Structure 7 North Essex – Potential Benefits 32 Housing Areas 56 PART 1: THE STRATEGIC CONTEXT 9 Existing Communities – Town Centre 57 Potential Benefits 32 Introduction 9 Neighbourhoods, services and facilities 58 DESIGN EVOLUTION: TOWARDS A Growth 9 FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT 34 Employment 59 Governing Structure 10 Garden Suburb Envelope 34 PART 3: DELIVERY AND IMPLEMENTATION 61 PART 2: THE CONCEPT FRAMEWORK 13 Strategic Area for Development 34 DELIVERY, INVESTMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE 61 SYNTHESIS OF BASELINE 13 Boundaries 36 A Step Change in Delivery 61 Site Context 14 Concept Framework 36 Phasing within the Plan Period 61 Key Influences 17 Strategic Highway Improvements 38 Key Highway and Transport Infrastructure STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT 20 New railway station area 42 Investment 62 The Vision 20 Development Assumptions 42 Cycle of Investment and Infrastructure 63 Stakeholder Workshop 20 Indicative Development Capacity 42 MONITORING PERFORMANCE AGAINST THE GARDEN COMMUNITIES Stakeholder Briefing 24 Framework Elements 42 CHARTER CRITERIA 64 VISION,
    [Show full text]
  • ESSEX L 2 ESSEX
    • ESSEX is one of the metropolitan ,hil'es and takes its The Thames flows through London to the :Sorth Sea, name· from the commonwealth of the }:a:O;t .Saxons (one h;n-iug several quay~, but no great haven on the Essex • of tbe English hordes which settled in South Britain), shore, and the limits of the port of London extend to and of which Mid<lle;ex, London anu Hertfordshire after- . Haveugore creek in this county. The Lee, and its head, wards furmeu part. _\fter the }:usl<arrlian,; and Celts ' the Stort, are navigable, pa.;;sing through Bishop Stort­ had been driven out, }:s<e:>: was held by the Belgic tribe furd, Harlow and \Valtham Abbey; the Roding rises in of the Trinobantes until the Roman inroad. Of the 1 Easton Park, near Dunrnow, and flows south for about 36 Romans it wa_o; a great :seat and here wa.s- their city uf \ ntile,; past Ongar to llford, where it becomes- navigable, Camulodunun1. The 1\'Plch, again becoming nla.-;ters, ] and, pa~sing Barking, joins the 'l,hame~: the Bourne were driven out by the }~ast Saxon:-;. The chief dans ~ hrook, 12 n1iles long-, falls into the Than1es at Dagenham: concerned in the ~ettlen1ent u·ere the-· 'rilling, Halling, the Ingerbuurne rise5 in South lVeald and falls into the_ . Denning, Thnrring, BPmrin~, Billing, Htll'uing, ~Ianning, Than1es near Uainham: the Marditch, 12 mile3> long; Totting, Bucking- ~and lhumiug, being the smue as tlwse fo1·ms a creek at Purfieet: the Crouch, 25 miles long, engaged in the settlement of East .!uglia.
    [Show full text]
  • A120 Braintree to Marks Tey Improvement
    A120 Braintree to Marks Tey Improvement Public Consultation February 2005 Introduction The Highways Agency plans to provide an improved route for the A120 between Braintree and Marks Tey. This brochure summarises the need for the improvement and outlines the proposals. There will be an exhibition at which representatives from the Highways Agency and its Consulting Engineers, Hyder Consulting, will be available to answer your questions. Details of the venues and dates are given on the back of this brochure. Please note that since the studies are at a preliminary stage, the information, layouts and maps in this leaflet can only be regarded as illustrative. To the west, an improved dual carriageway route for the A120 from the M11 to Braintree was The Need for the Project recently completed. The new junctions feature The A120 is an important strategic route between overpasses or underpasses in order to minimise the M11 motorway in the west and the port of delays and provide safer junctions. To the east, Harwich in the east, forming part of the Trans the section of the A120 around Colchester is European Road Network (Dublin to Brussels). already a dual carriageway, with overpasses or The section of the A120 between Braintree and underpasses at junctions. The section of the Marks Tey currently carries approximately 20,000 existing A120 from Braintree to the A12 Trunk vehicles/day and is a single carriageway road. It Road at Marks Tey passes through the village of is estimated that by 2012, this section may carry Bradwell and several hamlets. There are tight approximately 25,000 vehicles/day and this bends at the Coggeshall Bypass and a poor could increase to around 30,000 vehicles/day by safety record at certain locations.
    [Show full text]
  • A120 Braintree to A12
    A120 BRAINTREE TO A12 Essex County Council TECHNICAL APPRAISAL REPORT B3553T41-JAC-HGN-00-REP-C-0002 | P01 11/1/17 TECHNIC AL A PPR AISAL R EPORT Ess ex C ounty Council A120 Braintree to A12 Technical Appraisal Report Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Document purpose and structure ................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Scheme Description .................................................................................................................................... 9 2. PLANNING BRIEF .................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Justification for the scheme ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Scheme Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Previous Work and Studies ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Parish and Town Council Submissions to the Colchester Borough Council Electoral Review
    Parish and Town Council submissions to the Colchester Borough Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from Parish and Town Councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Colchester District Personal Details: Name: Olav Bradstock E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Aldham Parish Council Comment text: Aldham Parish Council write in respect of the consultation on the latest electoral review for Colchester Borough Council and the draft recommendations made. Aldham Parish Council comes within the Ward entitled Lexden and Braiswick. The ward covers both rural and suburban areas. The requirements and issues for these two types of areas are notably different. It is felt having a three councillor ward arrangement will make it difficult for engaging in and resolving issues with and through ward councillors. This situation will be further complicated if the three ward councillors are not all from the same political party. There has been evidence in the past of Wards with multiple councillors not working together for the good of the whole electorate of the ward. It is also felt there is a real danger of the rural areas becoming “second class citizens” and the suburban areas will get the Lion’s share of resources whether it be monetary or time. This would be totally unfair, simply because these suburban
    [Show full text]
  • North Essex Garden Communities Concept Feasibility Study
    NORTH ESSEX GARDEN COMMUNITIES CONCEPT FEASIBILITY STUDY PART 2 VOLUME 1: BASELINE COMPENDIUM JUNE 2016 North Essex Garden Communities Concept Feasibility Study - Baseline Compendium Colchester Borough Council, Braintree District Council, Tendring District Council and Essex County Council This chapter provides baseline synthesis and key findings associated to the North of Colchester area of investigation and the wider 5km buffer zone. 58 AECOM Colchester Borough Council, Braintree District Council, Tendring District Council and Essex County Council North Essex Garden Communities Concept Feasibility Study - Baseline Compendium 03 North of Colchester 3.1 Site Overview and Landuse 3.2 Call for Sites 3.3 Land Ownership and Development Arrangements 3.4 Surrounding Settlement Hierarchy 3.5 Economic Context 3.6 Movement and Connectivity 3.7 Landscape and Strategic Networks 3.8 Agricultural Land Classifications and Mineral Safeguarding Areas 3.9 Ecological Designations 3.10 Parks, Recreation and Historic Environment 3.11 Water Cycle 3.12 Utilities 3.13 Social Infrastructure AECOM 59 North Essex Garden Communities Concept Feasibility Study - Baseline Compendium Colchester Borough Council, Braintree District Council, Tendring District Council and Essex County Council 3.1 Site Overview and Landuse Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2016. Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2016. Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community Legend Contains Ordnance Survey data Crown copyright and database right © 2016.
    [Show full text]