DOCSLIB.ORG

Parish and Town Council Submissions to the Colchester Borough Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parish and Town Council Submissions to the Colchester Borough Council Electoral Review Parish and Town Council submissions to the Colchester Borough Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from Parish and Town Councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Colchester District Personal Details: Name: Olav Bradstock E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Aldham Parish Council Comment text: Aldham Parish Council write in respect of the consultation on the latest electoral review for Colchester Borough Council and the draft recommendations made. Aldham Parish Council comes within the Ward entitled Lexden and Braiswick. The ward covers both rural and suburban areas. The requirements and issues for these two types of areas are notably different. It is felt having a three councillor ward arrangement will make it difficult for engaging in and resolving issues with and through ward councillors. This situation will be further complicated if the three ward councillors are not all from the same political party. There has been evidence in the past of Wards with multiple councillors not working together for the good of the whole electorate of the ward. It is also felt there is a real danger of the rural areas becoming “second class citizens” and the suburban areas will get the Lion’s share of resources whether it be monetary or time. This would be totally unfair, simply because these suburban areas have a much higher density of population. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4411 12/01/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Colchester District Personal Details: Name: BOXTED PARISH COUNCIL BOXTED PARISH COUNCIL E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Boxted Parish Council Comment text: BOXTED PARISH COUNCIL - Boxted Parish Council fully support the alternative proposals submitted by West Bergholt Parish Council suggesting changes to proposed boundaries to reflect the community identities of urban and rural communities, separately and equitably, thus creating a Rural North and Rural West Colchester Ward.’ Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4380 14/01/2015 BOUNDARY COMMISSION PROPOSALS FOR COLCHESTER BOROUGH COMMENTS FROM DEDHAM PARISH COUNCIL (agreed 12.01.15) Proposals were made last year from the Boundary Commission to review the ward structure within the Borough of Colchester on account of the imbalance in councillor representation that existed as a result of the relative growth of the population in the central areas of Colchester. Whilst there was some preliminary consultation at the end of last year regarding the principles underpinning the proposals it was not until the detailed response from Colchester Borough was made to the Boundary Commission that the Commission was able to consider and recommend definitive changes within the Borough. The Boundary Commission’s proposals for change were circulated both by Colchester Borough Council and under cover of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Boundary Commission dated 29th November 2014. The closing date for submissions is 12th January 2015. The first opportunity, however, for Dedham Parish Council to formally consider these proposals was at its meeting on l2th January 2015 and given these circumstances our clerk sought agreement from the Boundary Commission to submit our comments immediately following this meeting. The proposals from the Boundary Commission have been well published and are accessible on both their and CBC’s website so I only propose to summarise these in very broad terms. The overall changes proposed are as follows: To reduce the size of Colchester Borough Council from 60 to 51 councillors To redistribute councillor representation in the overall borough on the basis of 17 broadly equally sized wards, with each new ward being represented by three councillors. Impact of the proposals on the Dedham and Langham Ward The Dedham and Langham Ward, the population of which is 1,582 and 869 respectively, currently have l councillor. Views expressed within the overall ward can generally be summarised as being supportive of the existing arrangements. The ward councillor, who historically has lived within the ward, is both accessible and knowledgeable about ward affairs in both parishes and has been able to develop positive interaction with the array of organisations and issues that face both parishes. He participates in both formal and informal parish meetings as necessary and the structure is considered to be a positive and effective way of achieving good local representation. The new proposals as presented propose significant change to the above arrangements in that the Dedham and Langham Parish is now proposed for inclusion in a geographically large new ward – at present called the Rural North – that spans from Dedham in the East to Great Tey in the West. It is proposed that this new ward is served by three councillors. Initial contact with Langham Parish has demonstrated significant concerns with the proposed arrangements which largely centre around the differences between the parishes involved and the minimal links that exist particularly between those in the east and those in the west. We are not aware of any significant representations that have been made about these proposals by other parishes, with the exception of West Bergholt. The views of the Parish of West Bergholt are appended to this report and propose an alternative arrangement for the structure of wards which, from their perspective, would be a preferable alternative. We have been invited to comment on and or support these alternative proposals. Dedham Parish Council has therefore to decide: (a) Does it wish to accept the arrangements proposed without further comment? (b) Does it wish to indicate a preference for the alternative proposals put forward by West Bergholt? (c) Does it wish to reject the proposals put forward and make other proposals? Option (a) The principal merit in the proposals put forward is that the grouping together of parishes in the proposed ward of rural north does at least retain a range of parishes that are primarily rural parishes. In this sense many of the issues and concerns facing all these parishes will arguably be similar and different from those facing the central wards of Colchester. Against this is that notwithstanding the above similarity, each parish will be at different stages of economic and strategic development with significant variety in the range and priority of issues affecting them. This will make their representation at ward level more complex and potentially weaker than current arrangements. Option (b) The problem, as ably articulated by West Bergholt, is that having adopted a standard policy of three councillors to each ward, the scope for making alternative proposals whilst achieving a balance in the representation of the electorate, is limited. It appears therefore that notwithstanding the genuine nature of the consultation and the criteria which have been suggested that need to be reflected – the reality is that unless the Boundary Commission is able and willing to accept a more flexible approach to having some wards represented by less than 3 councillors – we are likely to end up with being located within a much larger geographic area. The alternative proposals put forward by West Bergholt would have the effect of locating Dedham and Langham within a smaller geographic ward, still of rural parishes, which we believe would have greater potential for sharing common problems and infrastructure whilst retaining a similar sized population. To this extent we support this. However, we do have some concern that whilst the proposals, as presented, seem attractive, they would clearly have to be looked at by the Boundary Commission to establish whether the associated impact on the remaining areas of the proposed Lexdon and Braiswick Parish that would have to be incorporated in other wards could be accommodated. If so, then this might be an attractive proposition. Option (c) We were not able to propose any other alternatives that we believe to be worthy of consideration. 2 Recommendations to the Boundary Commission (agreed by Dedham Parish Council 12.01.15) That we are disappointed that the framework already adopted for the Colchester Borough is predicated on a 17 ward 3-councillot structure for each ward, which has limited the option for particularly the smaller, rural wards to have more local and discrete representation. The Boundary Commission has identified three principal criteria that it believes must be satisfied to deliver good governance and representation. These are: - Electoral Quality (each councillor represents a similar number of voters) - Community Identity (reflects the identity and interests of local communities - Effective and convenient local government (helping your council discharge its responsibilities effectively It appears to us that only one of these criteria is fulfilled by the current proposals. There is no identifiable community interest or link between the range of parishes proposed for inclusion in this new north ward. Furthermore there are no common transport, facility or infrastructure links between the stated parishes. In terms of effective and convenient local government – it is hard to see how a proposal that would require three new councillors to have a broader geographic range of representation whilst simultaneously having to deal with the different strategies, organisational structures and interests of 11 distinct parishes is neither effective or convenient. That we find the alternative proposals put forward by West Bergholt Council more attractive in that they retain the groupings of rural parishes that we all seem to support whilst restricting the geographic area and range of representation that would be required. It is also more conceivable that some community of interest and collaboration might be possible within a larger but not unmanageable ward size.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Young Colchester: Life Chances, Assets and Anti-Social Behaviour
    A LOCAL PARTNERSHIP IMPROVING COMMUNITY SERVICES YOUNG COLCHESTER: LIFE CHANCES, ASSETS AND ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR YOUTH SERVICE The Catalyst Project is led by the University of Essex and received £2.2 million funding from the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and is now monitored by the Office for Students (OfS). The project uses this funding across the following initiatives: Evaluation Empowering public services to evaluate the impact of their work Risk Stratification Using predictive analytics to anticipate those at risk and to better target resources Volunteer Connector Hub Providing benefits to local community and students through volunteering Contact us: E [email protected] T +44 (0) 1206 872057 www.essex.ac.uk/research/showcase/catalyst-project The Catalyst Project The University of Essex Wivenhoe Park Colchester Essex CO4 3SQ 3 Young Colchester: Life Chances, Assets and Anti-Social Behaviour 2018 Contents 0.0 Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Project scope and methods 3.0 Young people in Colchester 4.0 Youth offending, victimisation and safeguarding in Colchester 5.0 Anti-social behaviour in Colchester 6.0 Interventions 7.0 Young people and community assets in Colchester 8.0 Recommendations References Appendices Authors Carlene Cornish, Pamela Cox and Ruth Weir (University of Essex) with Mel Rundle, Sonia Carr and Kaitlin Trenerry (Colchester Borough Council) Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the following A LOCAL PARTNERSHIP IMPROVING organisations for their assistance with this COMMUNITY SERVICES project: Colchester Borough Council Safer Colchester Partnership; Colchester Borough Homes; Colchester Community Policing Team; Colchester Institute; Essex County Council (Organisational Intelligence, Youth Service, Youth Offending Service); Nova (Alternative Provision provider); University of Essex (Catalyst, Make Happen and outreach teams).
    [Show full text]
  • News from the Chief Executive
    News from the Chief Executive This month's article is coming from Jonkoping in Sweden where I am visiting the conference and exhibition of the Swedish Greenkeepers Association. The SGA and BIGGA have a long The Scottish Region has several changes to announce in relation to Harrogate history of association and the Swedish greenkeepers feel that Week 2006. It has been decided to withdraw travel to and from the Conference they have a strong bond with their counterparts in the UK. When I venue at Harrogate. Having taken everything into consideration the Board has sit and talk to them it surprises me how similar many of the decided it is no longer practical or cost effective to continue with this service. As in previous years Harrogate Week will provide Seminars and Workshops. Two working conditions, golfer's expectations, politics and pressures day, one day and half day workshops will be available. The cost of these will be are. If it were not for the language then I could well imagine that intimated nearer the time but it should be noted they are not part of the Scottish I was sat in any group in Harrogate during our own event in Region package. However there will be a series of Seminars run by Trade firms at January. which everyone is welcome to attend free of charge. Everyone that I have met has made me very welcome, they have The Regional Administrator will continue to arrange and book accommodation always tried to speak English when in my company and speak highly for anyone who wishes to attend.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiptree Neighbourhood Plan 2020 – 2033 Regulation 16 Edition (2020) Tiptree Parish Council
    Tiptree Neighbourhood Plan. Tiptree Neighbourhood Plan 2020 – 2033 Regulation 16 Edition (2020) Tiptree Parish Council Regulation 16 Edition Page 1 of 48 Tiptree Neighbourhood Plan. A List of the Neighbourhood Plan Policies contained in this document TIP01 Tiptree Settlement Boundaries Page 20 TIP02 Good Quality Design Page 22 TIP03 Residential Car Parking Page 23 TIIP04 Building for Life Page 24 TIP05 Dwelling Mix Page 25 TIP06 Cycling, Walking and Disability Access Routes Page 26 TIP07 Mitigating the Impact of Vehicular Traffic through Tiptree Village Page 29 TIP08 Tiptree Village Centre: Existing Businesses Page 31 TIP09 Tiptree Village Centre: New Developments Page 31 TIP10 Business Development Page 32 TIP11 Planning Obligations Page 34 TIP12 Comprehensive Development Page 36 TIP13 Tower End Page 37 TIP14 Highland Nursery and Elms Farm Page 39 TIP15 Countryside and Green Spaces Page 43 TIP16 Essex Coast Recreational Disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy Page 44 TIP17 Historic Environment Page 45 Cover photograph: After the Carnival – Church Road, Tiptree We are grateful to Sue Shepherd, David Turner and Jonathan Greenwood for the use of photographs within this document. Regulation 16 Edition Page 2 of 48 Tiptree Neighbourhood Plan. 1. Table of Contents 2. Foreword .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword to the Regulation 16 Edition ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Colchester Holiday Park Colchester 50B Greenstead Lexden Osborne Street St
    Route map for Hedingham service 50B (outbound) Colchester Holiday Park Colchester 50B Greenstead Lexden Osborne Street St. John's Town Railway Station Street Hythe Stanway The Pownall Britannia Crescent University of Essex Cemetery Queen Mary Gates Avenue Old Heath Lord Holland Road Crematorium Middlewick Chariot Drive Ranges Gymnasium Kingsford Buckley Place Cross Roads Stansted Road Monkwick Greenways Maypole Berechurch Baptist Church Green Hall Road Heckfordbridge Playing Fields Weir Lane The Cherry Kingsford Tree The Farm Roman Hill Folly Friday House Wood New Great Cut Les Bois Britain Haye Lane Fingringhoe The Layer-de-la-Haye Birch Fox Water Works Layer Birch Green Abberton Road Langenhoe Abberton Layer Breton Reservoir Essex Wildlife Trust Visitor Centre Abberton Reservoir St. Ives Road School Peldon Lane North Lower Village Road Stores 50B Copt Hall Lane Church Lane Great Wigborough Little Wigborough Old Kings Abbots Wick Lane Head School Mersea Lane South Island © OpenStreetMap 1.5 km 3 km 4.5 km 6 km set-0550B_(1).y08 (outbound) Route map for Hedingham service 50B (inbound) Colchester Holiday Park Colchester 50B Greenstead Lexden Osborne Street St. John's Town Railway Street Station Stanway Hythe The Pownall Britannia Crescent University of Essex Queen Mary Avenue Cemetery Gates Lord Holland Road Old Heath Chariot Crematorium Drive Gymnasium Middlewick Kingsford Buckley Ranges Place Cross Roads Stansted Road Monkwick Maypole Greenways Green Baptist Weir Heckfordbridge Playing Fields Church Lane The Cherry Kingsford Tree The Farm Roman Hill Folly Friday House Wood New Great Cut Les Bois Britain Haye Layer-de-la-Haye Lane The Birch Fox Water Works Layer Birch Green Abberton Road Langenhoe Abberton Layer Breton Reservoir Essex Wildlife Trust Visitor Centre Abberton Reservoir 50B St.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Report Volume 1 B3553T41-JAC-EGN-00-REP-EN-0001 | P00.1 24/11/16
    A120 Braintree to A12 Essex County Council Environmental Assessment Report Volume 1 B3553T41-JAC-EGN-00-REP-EN-0001 | P00.1 24/11/16 ENVIR ONMEN TAL ASSESSM ENT R EPORT Essex C ounty Council ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 1. Purpose and structure of this report ..................................................................................................... 10 2. The scheme .............................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Need for the scheme ................................................................................................................................. 12 2.2 Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 History........................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.4 Planning policies and context .................................................................................................................... 12 2.5 Aims and objectives ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigation at St Nicholas' Church, Copt Hall Lane
    Archaeological investigation at St Nicholas’ Church, Copt Hall Lane, Little Wigborough, Essex January 2019 Report prepared by Mark Baister Figures by Chris Lister and Emma Holloway commissioned by David Whymark Building Design and Conservation on behalf of St Nicholas’ Parochial Church Council CAT project ref: 19/01i NGR: TL 9810 1453 (centre) Colchester Archaeological Trust Roman Circus House, Roman Circus Walk, Colchester, Essex CO2 7GZ Tel: 01206 501785 CAT Report 1375 E-mail: [email protected] February 2019 Contents 1. Summary 1 2. Introduction 1 3. Archaeological background 1 4. Aims 2 5. Results 2 6. Finds 3 7. Discussion 3 8. Acknowledgements 4 9. References 4 10. Abbreviations and glossary 4 11. Contents of archive 4 12. Archive deposition 5 Appendix 1: Context List List of Figures Fig. 1 Site location. Fig. 2 Plan of the church showing test-pit location and areas investigated in 2005. Fig. 3 Representative section. CAT Report 1375: Archaeological investigation at St Nicholas’ Church, Copt Hall Lane, Little Wigborough, Essex January 2019 1 Summary A programme of archaeological investigation was undertaken by Colchester Archaeological Trust at St Nicholas’ Church, Copt Hall Lane, Little Wigborough, Essex in January 2019. The work was undertaken in advance of underpinning works. One test-pit was observed by CAT, dug against the west wall of the nave and the south- west buttress of the church. The foundations recorded in this test-pit are similar in composition to the foundation observed in the 2005 evaluation (CAT Report 350), and appear to be the original 15th-century foundations of the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Changes) Order 2004
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 2813 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The County of Essex (Electoral Changes) Order 2004 Made - - - - 28th October 2004 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) Whereas the Boundary Committee for England(a), acting pursuant to section 15(4) of the Local Government Act 1992(b), has submitted to the Electoral Commission(c) recommendations dated April 2004 on its review of the county of Essex: And whereas the Electoral Commission have decided to give effect, with modifications, to those recommendations: And whereas a period of not less than six weeks has expired since the receipt of those recommendations: Now, therefore, the Electoral Commission, in exercise of the powers conferred on them by sections 17(d) and 26(e) of the Local Government Act 1992, and of all other powers enabling them in that behalf, hereby make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the County of Essex (Electoral Changes) Order 2004. (2) This Order shall come into force – (a) for the purpose of proceedings preliminary or relating to any election to be held on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005, on the day after that on which it is made; (b) for all other purposes, on the ordinary day of election of councillors in 2005. Interpretation 2. In this Order – (a) The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, established by the Electoral Commission in accordance with section 14 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.41). The Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • West Bergholt Neighbourhood Plan 27 - 114 E
    Council Meeting Council Chamber, Town Hall, High Street, Colchester, CO1 1PJ Wednesday, 16 October 2019 at 18:00 Page 1 of 166 Information for Members of the Public Access to information and meetings You have the right to attend all meetings of the Council, its Committees and Cabinet. You also have the right to see the agenda (the list of items to be discussed at a meeting), which is usually published five working days before the meeting, and minutes once they are published. Dates of the meetings are available here: https://colchester.cmis.uk.com/colchester/MeetingCalendar.aspx. Most meetings take place in public. This only changes when certain issues, for instance, commercially sensitive information or details concerning an individual are considered. At this point you will be told whether there are any issues to be discussed in private, if so, you will be asked to leave the meeting. Have Your Say! The Council welcomes contributions and representations from members of the public at most public meetings. If you would like to speak at a meeting and need to find out more, please refer to the Have Your Say! arrangements here: http://www.colchester.gov.uk/haveyoursay. Audio Recording, Mobile phones and other devices The Council audio records public meetings for live broadcast over the internet and the recordings are available to listen to afterwards on the Council’s website. Audio recording, photography and filming of meetings by members of the public is also welcomed. Phones, tablets, laptops, cameras and other devices can be used at all meetings of the Council so long as this doesn’t cause a disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • All Saints Colchester Marriages 1609-1720 (Grooms) Groom Surname Groom 1St Status Bride 1St Bride Surname Status Marriage Date Notes ? Tho
    All Saints Colchester marriages 1609-1720 (grooms) Groom surname Groom 1st Status Bride 1st Bride surname Status Marriage date Notes ? Tho. Single man Martha WOODWARD Single woman 05 Sep 1653 No groom's surname. [BR]USSE Samuell Jane BROCK 05 Sep 1677 Licence. Both of Feareing [FP]OSTER Edward Ann BARKER 15 Jun 1686 Bride of St Leonard's [LR]OWTH Ambrose Single man Sarah PURSLOW Single woman 15 Feb 1676/7 The L and R are over each other. Licence. ABBOT Gyles Widower Mary WEBB Widow 07 Mar 1697/8 Both of St Buttolph's ABEL James Anne WILLIAMS 01 Feb 1680/1 Licence. Both of St Leonard's ABLET Henry Single man Mary MILLAR Single woman 20 Feb 1701/2 Licence. Groom of S. Buttolphs, bride of Hadley ADAMS George Single man Anne SMALLEDGE Single woman 20 Feb 1678/9 A [= allegation ?]. Both of St Buttolphs ADAMS William Mary WRIGHT 31 Oct 1689 ADLER John Sara LANGHAM 15 Feb 1685/6 Licence. Both of St Leonard's AERIS George ? ? 20 Oct 1667 Groom of Sawkitt [ Salcott ?] AGAR John Phoebe GREENFEILD 25 Dec 1693 Bride of Greenstead AGNES Robert Ann TODD 07 Mar 1720/1 AILEWARD John Single man Mary BEMISH Single woman 24 Dec 1675 Licence. Both of Inworth No bride's surname. Year is given as 166 and is probably one ALAIS Petar Mary ? 03 Oct 1660 of 1660 to 1664. [ Alliss ? ]. ALCOCK James Mary FOAKES 31 Jul 1681 Both of West Marsey [ West Mersea ]. ALDERTON Anthony Single man Hannah ROGERS Single woman 31 Oct 1676 Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • ECC Bus Consultation
    Essex County Council ‘Getting Around in Essex’ Local Bus Service Network Review Consultation September 2015 Supporting Documentation 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Proposed broader changes to the way As set out in the accompanying questionnaire, Essex County Council (ECC) is undertaking ECC contracts for services that may also affect a major review of the local bus services in Essex that it pays for. These are the services that are not provided by commercial bus operators. It represents around 15% of the total customers bus network, principally in the evenings, on Sundays and in rural areas although some As well as specific service changes there are a number of other proposals which may do operate in or between towns during weekdays and as school day only services. This affect customers. These include: consultation does not cover services supported by Thurrock and Southend councils. • Service Support Prioritisation. The questionnaire sets out how the County Council will The questionnaire asks for your views about proposed changes to the supported bus in future prioritise its support for local bus services in Essex, given limited funding. network in your district. This booklet contains the information you need to understand This is based on public responses to two previous consultations and a long standing the changes and allow you to answer the questionnaire. Service entries are listed in assessment of value for money. This will be based on service category and within straight numerical order and cover the entire County of Essex (they are not divided by each category on the basis of cost per passenger journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits Made Under S31(6) Highways Act 1980
    Essex County Council (The Commons Registration Authority) Index of Register for Deposits made under s31(6) Highways Act 1980 and s15A(1) Commons Act 2006 For all enquiries about the contents of the Register please contact the: Public Rights of Way and Highway Records Manager email address: [email protected] Telephone No. 0345 603 7631 Highway Highway Commons Declaration Link to Unique Ref OS GRID Statement Statement Deeds Reg No. DISTRICT PARISH LAND DESCRIPTION POST CODES DEPOSITOR/LANDOWNER DEPOSIT DATE Expiry Date SUBMITTED REMARKS No. REFERENCES Deposit Date Deposit Date DEPOSIT (PART B) (PART D) (PART C) >Land to the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops Christopher James Harold Philpot of Stortford TL566209, C/PW To be CM22 6QA, CM22 Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton CA16 Form & 1252 Uttlesford Takeley >Land on the west side of Canfield Road, Takeley, Bishops TL564205, 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated. 6TG, CM22 6ST Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4LN Plan Stortford TL567205 on behalf of Takeley Farming LLP >Land on east side of Station Road, Takeley, Bishops Stortford >Land at Newland Fann, Roxwell, Chelmsford >Boyton Hall Fa1m, Roxwell, CM1 4LN >Mashbury Church, Mashbury TL647127, >Part ofChignal Hall and Brittons Farm, Chignal St James, TL642122, Chelmsford TL640115, >Part of Boyton Hall Faim and Newland Hall Fann, Roxwell TL638110, >Leys House, Boyton Cross, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM I 4LP TL633100, Christopher James Harold Philpot of >4 Hill Farm Cottages, Bishops Stortford Road, Roxwell, CMI 4LJ TL626098, Roxwell, Boyton Hall Farmhouse, Boyton C/PW To be >10 to 12 (inclusive) Boyton Hall Lane, Roxwell, CM1 4LW TL647107, CM1 4LN, CM1 4LP, CA16 Form & 1251 Chelmsford Mashbury, Cross, Chelmsford, Essex, CM14 11/11/2020 11/11/2020 allocated.
    [Show full text]
  • England Coast Path Maldon to Salcott Natural England’S Report to the Secretary of State: Overview L E L
    www.gov.uk/englandcoastpath England Coast Path Maldon to Salcott Natural England’s Report to the Secretary of State: Overview 2 Great Map A: Key map - Maldon to Salcott Wigborough Chapter number and title Salcott 1 Maldon Promenade Park to Heybridge Basin (Maps 1a to 1c) Salc 2 Heybridge Basin to Goldhanger (Maps 2a to 2c) ott 3 Goldhanger to Tollesbury Wick Marshes (Maps 3a to 3e) 5 26 B10 4 Tollesbury Wick Marshes to Old Hall Marshes (Maps 4a to 4d) Tolleshunt 5 Old Hall Marshes to Salcott (Maps 5a to 5f) O D'Arcy ld H all M ar she Extent of proposals A road s B road 3 Extent of proposals in B10 each chapter Minor road 23 Tollesbury Broad Street 4 Green B Goldhanger 1 0 2 2 T oll W esb ic ury 6 k M Heybridge B102 ar 3 she Gol s dha nge r R R 1 VE TE Bradwell RI A Waterside KW 2 AC Hey BL B brid asin ge MALDON M Osea 0 1 2 Kilometres ald Island Pro on Northey P m Island 0 1 Mile ark ena de Ramsey Island Based upon Ordnance Survey material on behalf of HMSO. © Crown copyright and database right 2017. All rights reserved. Natural England OS licence number 100022021 England Coast Path | Maldon to Salcott | Natural England’s Report to the Secretary of State | Overview Advice on reading the report This report sets out for approval by the Secretary of State our proposals for the England Coast Path and associated Coastal Margin on this stretch of coast.
    [Show full text]