DOCSLIB.ORG

S12889-019-7814-X.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S12889-019-7814-X.Pdf Azit et al. BMC Public Health (2019) 19:1432 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7814-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Factors associated with tuberculosis disease among children who are household contacts of tuberculosis cases in an urban setting in Malaysia Noor Atika Azit1, Aniza Ismail1*, Norfazilah Ahmad1, Rohani Ismail2 and Shuhaily Ishak2 Abstract Background: With the rise in prevalence of childhood tuberculosis (TB) globally, contact tracing should be a powerful strategy for early diagnosis and management, especially in children who are household contacts of active TB cases. Here, we aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with TB disease in children who are household contacts of TB cases. Methods: We used a cross-sectional study with data from the Malaysian TB Information System (TBIS) recorded from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2017. All children aged 0–14 years who were registered in the TBIS with at least one household contact of TB cases were included in the study. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (adj. OR) and for adjusting the confounding factors. Results: A total of 2793 children were included in the study. The prevalence of active TB was 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31, 1.77%). Children aged < 5 years [adj. OR 9.48 (95% CI: 3.41, 26.36) p < 0.001] with positive tuberculin skin test [adj. OR 395.73 (95% CI: 134.17, 1167.13), p < 0.001] and investigation period of > 6 weeks [adj. OR 7.48 (95% CI: 2.88, 19.43), p < 0.001] had significantly higher odds for TB disease. Conclusions: The prevalence of TB disease in children who were household contacts of TB cases is relatively low. However, contact tracing programmes should not only focus on children aged < 5 years and with positive tuberculin skin test results, but also be empowered to reduce the investigation period. Keywords: Childhood tuberculosis, Active case finding, Urban setting, Active tuberculosis, Household contact Background is acquired through the inhalation of aerosol droplets Until recent years, the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) dis- containing bacilli expectorated by an active TB patient, ease in children has remained challenging. The majority especially in smear-positive pulmonary TB [3]. There- of studies conducted globally have revealed that child- fore, the likelihood of infection is higher when children hood TB remains under-recognised and underdiagnosed are close contacts of TB cases [4]. [1]. This is due to the non-specific presentation of the According to the WHO, close contact is defined as a cases and the paucibacillary characteristics of the smear person ‘living in the same household or in frequent con- finding. The World Health Organization (WHO) classi- tact with the source case’ [5]. The source case is a TB fies childhood TB as children aged 0–14 years with case that results in infection among their contacts [5]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection [2]. The infection The definition of household contact commonly used in TB contact tracing programmes is ‘a person or group of people, related or unrelated to each other, who live to- * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] gether in the same dwelling unit and share a common 1Department of Community Health, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC), Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, 56000 Kuala source of food’ [1]. To improve the detection of TB Lumpur, Malaysia cases, the WHO and the International Union Against Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Azit et al. BMC Public Health (2019) 19:1432 Page 2 of 6 TB and Lung Disease recommend that contact tracing conduct a case investigation and identify the contacts be included in national TB programmes (NTP) [5]. This through interviews and a home visit. All contacts will be is because, in childhood TB, early detection is one of the referred to the nearest health clinic for TB screening. To fundamental aspects of reducing morbidity and mortality ensure that the contacts follow the referral, a written no- [6]. Most childhood TB cases are related to close contact tice is issued to the contacts and to the TB team in- with TB disease [1, 5]. A meta-analysis found that chil- charge at the nearest clinic. At the clinic, the contacts dren who were household contacts had four times will be screened by trained medical personnel, and all higher chances of acquiring infection compared to non– necessary contact information will be recorded in the household contact children [7]. Malaysian TB Information System (TBIS). This process Currently, contact tracing is widely practised in low–TB is monitored and verified regularly by the district health burden countries [8]. In Malaysia, it is routinely per- officers in charge. The TBIS contains data for TB sur- formed after an active TB case is detected and notified to veillance system in Malaysia. Data from the district will the health department. According to the Malaysian Clin- be analysed at the state level by the state TB organizer ical Practice Guidelines for TB, a child contact must be before compilation at the national level. The Kuala Lum- screened within 6 weeks of diagnosis of the index case [9]. pur Federal Health Office (JKWPKL) is responsible for However, previous studies conducted in Malaysia have re- TB disease surveillance in Kuala Lumpur, and monitors vealed that most diagnosed TB cases remain heavily TB data from four districts: Titiwangsa, Cheras, Lembah dependent on passive case detection, where patients have Pantai and Kepong. already developed sufficiently significant symptoms spur- ring them to seek medical treatment [10]. This is an un- Study setting desirable outcome for any NTP, as TB is still prevalent in In 2016, the estimated population of Kuala Lumpur was the country. The WHO reported that childhood TB inci- 1.78 million. The city has achieved 100% urbanisation dence had increased to 1 million cases worldwide in 2016 and is the most densely populated state in Malaysia. In [11]. Regionally, the WHO Western Pacific Region has 2016, the population density was 6891 persons per also shown a 6% increase in total childhood TB compared square kilometre. The estimated population aged 0–14 to the previous report in 2015 [12]. years was 368,600, which accounts for 20.6% of the total A similar pattern has surfaced in Malaysia, with the es- population in the city [13]. timated incidence increasing from 2800 cases to 3700 cases in the latest available report [11]. Even though Malaysia is classified as an intermediate–TB burden Study design and population country by the WHO, TB nevertheless poses a great This research adopted a cross-sectional study utilising threat, as the neighbouring countries are high–TB bur- TBIS data for the JKWPKL. All children registered in den countries, e.g. Indonesia and Thailand [11]. More- the TBIS from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2017, over, Malaysia, particularly the capital city of Kuala aged 0–14 years and with at least one household active Lumpur, receives an influx of immigrants from other TB case (index case), were included in the study. The high–TB burden countries from time to time. Therefore, operational definition for household contact was the contact tracing plays an important role in the TB pre- children and their index case sharing the same residen- vention and control, apart from high-risk groups screen- tial address. The minimum sample size was calculated ing in the community. This situation indicates a further based on the formula for cross-sectional studies by Fleiss need to explore the predictors of TB disease in children (with reference to Narayanan et al. [2007]), with power who are household contacts to aid health authorities in of 80% and a confidence interval (CI) of 95% [14, 15]. A developing a more strategic and efficient TB control and minimum of 240 samples were obtained. prevention programme. Hence, the present study aimed to identify the prevalence and the factors associated with Study tools TB disease in children who are household contacts of The JKWPKL TBIS was used. This system contains in- active TB cases to improve understanding of this issue. formation on all TB contacts and the index cases. Methods Background of contact tracing in Malaysia Ethical approval In Malaysia, TB is a mandatory notifiable disease under Approval for this study was obtained from the Medical the Prevention and Control of Infectious Disease Act Research and Ethics Committee of the Malaysian Minis- 1988 [9]. The district health office will receive a notifica- try of Health (NMRR-18-642-39,752) and the National tion from the treating doctors within 1 week after a TB University of Malaysia Faculty of Medicine Ethics Com- case is diagnosed. The district health officers will then mittee (UKM PPI/111/8/JEP-2018-572). Azit et al. BMC Public Health (2019) 19:1432 Page 3 of 6 Outcome variables and most were from the main ethnic group, i.e. the The primary outcome was TB disease in children and Malays (74.4%). Clinically, 95.3% (n = 41) had TB symp- was defined as children who were identified as con- toms, 48.8% (n = 21) had positive TST, 86.0% (n = 37) firmed TB cases in the TBIS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Membela Hak Pemilik Tanah
    Bil 3, Julai 2012 www.nurulizzah.com DI DALAM Subsidi Efisyen 02 Pilihan Kita Membanteras Kes 03 Ragut Program Klinik 04 Percuma terus berkhidmat walau dihalang 600 Warga Emas Sertai 05 Jom Shopping Kejohanan Badminton 07 Piala Nurul Izzah “Malam Berdarah” 08 Lembah Pantai Program Jom Shopping Kira-kira 200 orang warga emas yang menetap di kawasan parlimen Lembah Pantai telah bersama menjayakan Nombor dan Maklumat program Jom Shopping ditemani YB Nurul Izzah Anwar, pada 20hb Ogos dan 18hb September 2011. Penting DBKL : 1-800-88-3255 Kerosakan TNB : 15454 Syabas : 1-800-88-5252 Membela Hak Pemilik Tanah Indah Water : 1-800-88-3495 Alam Flora : 03-2052-7922 sepanjang tahun lepas YB Nurul Izzah Anwar Telekom : 103 antara gagasan ahli parlimen Pakatan Rakyat yang Tidak boleh digunakan referendum ini, telah berhempas pulas menghalang Rang Undang- katanya hendak dengar suara rakyat tetapi Skim Mesra Usia Emas (SMUE) Undang Perbadanan Pembangunan Kampong sebagai jalan pintas kalau pun minoriti, • Untuk menyemak Maklumat Bharu 2010 diluluskan. Usaha ini yang pernah AHLI (warga emas) samada diterajui Allahyarhamah Dr. Lo’ Lo’ Ghazali, ahli kalaupun 30, 40 orang tetapi mereka masih lagi pemilik sama ada sale and purchase sudah mendaftar atau belum, parlimen Titiwangsa, selaras dengan pendirian taip: SMUE SEMAK [No. IC majoriti pemilik dan pewaris tanah Kampung agreement ataupun waris tanah tersebut. Warga Emas] dan hantarkan Bharu. SMS ke 15888 • Untuk menyemak maklumat Mereka menolak keras penggubalan Rang Undang- kerajaan pusat untuk mendapat persetujuan PENAMA (waris), taip: Undang itu kerana ia tidak memberi jaminan pembangunan daripada pemilik dan pewaris tanah. SMUE PENAMA [No. IC bahawa hak mereka akan dipertahankan.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanisation, Development and Socio Cultural Changes in Malaysia
    Urbanisation, Development and Socio Cultural Changes in Malaysia 著者 YOSHIMURA Mako 出版者 Institute of Comparative Economic Studies, Hosei University journal or Journal of International Economic Studies publication title volume 17 page range 107-128 year 2003-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10114/696 JoumaloflntemationalEconomicS[udies(2003),No.17,107-128 o2003ThelmstituteofCompamtiveEconomicStudics,HoseiUniversity Urbanisation,DevelopmentandSocioCulturalChanges inMalaysia＊ MakoYOshimura FtJC"lZyq/SoCjα/SCje"CCS,ＨＯＳｅｊＵ"ive）Tｊｊｙ 1．Introduction Sincethe1970,s,theMalaysianeconomy-anditscapitalcity,KualaLumpur-de- velopedatalcmarkablerate,causingdramaticsocio-culmralchangesintheurbanareas・ Malaysiaisamulti-ethnicnationcomprisingMalays，Chinese，Indiansandotherethnic groups,Thegovernmentpolicy,especiallybeginningwiththeNewEconomicPolicy(NER l970-1990)wastoencourageMalaystoenterthemodemsectors・Thisinasenseledto the‘UrbanisationoftheMalays，andcaused,amongstothereffects,theMalaypopulation inKualaLumpurtoincleasesignificantlyThepoliciesthatsucceededtheNEP-viz･ theNationalDevelopmentPolicy(NDR1991-2000)andtheNationalVisionPolicy(NVR 2001-2010)－continuedthistendency､Whiletherehavebeenlecentdiscussionsontherise ofthe`newmiddleclass(es)，inSoutheastAsiancountries,inthecaseofMalaysia,itis necessarytoincludethefactorｓsuchasethnicity,genderandnationalityindiscusSionson thesocio-culturalsituation KualaLumpur,withapopulationofL37million(Z000Census)istheadministrative andeconomiccentre，ａｓwellasthecapitalcityofMalaysia・Thecityprovidedample employmentopportumties,andtheconsequentinHuxofMalayyouthschangeditsstrucmre
    [Show full text]
  • Wp Kuala Lumpur
    SURUHANJAYA PILIHAN RAYA MALAYSIA SENARAI BILANGAN PEMILIH MENGIKUT DAERAH MENGUNDI SEBELUM PERSEMPADANAN 2016 NEGERI : W.P KUALA LUMPUR SENARAI BILANGAN PEMILIH MENGIKUT DAERAH MENGUNDI SEBELUM PERSEMPADANAN 2016 NEGERI : W.P KUALA LUMPUR BAHAGIAN PILIHAN RAYA PERSEKUTUAN : KEPONG BAHAGIAN PILIHAN RAYA NEGERI : - KOD BAHAGIAN PILIHAN RAYA NEGERI : 114/00 SENARAI DAERAH MENGUNDI DAERAH MENGUNDI BILANGAN PEMILIH 114/00/01 KAMPONG MELAYU KEPONG 4,869 114/00/02 JINJANG TEMPATAN PERTAMA 3,042 114/00/03 JINJANG TEMPATAN KEDUA 3,680 114/00/04 JINJANG TEMPATAN KETIGA 4,061 114/00/05 JINJANG TEMPATAN KEEMPAT 2,172 114/00/06 JINJANG TENGAH 3,126 114/00/07 JINJANG TEMPATAN UTARA 3,113 114/00/08 JINJANG UTARA 3,667 114/00/09 PEKAN KEPONG 3,419 114/00/10 TAMAN KEPONG 7,654 114/00/11 KEPONG BARU BARAT 4,253 114/00/12 KEPONG UTARA 2,653 114/00/13 JINJANG TEMPATAN KESEPULUH 3,836 114/00/14 JINJANG TEMPATAN KESEBELAS 4,504 114/00/15 KEPONG SELATAN 2,457 114/00/16 KEPONG BARU TENGAH 2,748 114/00/17 KEPONG BARU TIMOR 3,506 114/00/18 KEPONG BARU TAMBAHAN 5,326 JUMLAH PEMILIH 68,086 SENARAI BILANGAN PEMILIH MENGIKUT DAERAH MENGUNDI SEBELUM PERSEMPADANAN 2016 NEGERI : W.P KUALA LUMPUR BAHAGIAN PILIHAN RAYA PERSEKUTUAN : BATU BAHAGIAN PILIHAN RAYA NEGERI : - KOD BAHAGIAN PILIHAN RAYA NEGERI : 115/00 SENARAI DAERAH MENGUNDI DAERAH MENGUNDI BILANGAN PEMILIH 115/00/01 TAMAN INTAN BAIDURI 2,869 115/00/02 TAMAN SRI MURNI 3,330 115/00/03 KAMPONG SELAYANG LAMA 884 115/00/04 TAMAN BERINGIN 3,610 115/00/05 TAMAN WAHYU 3,653 115/00/06 TAMAN BATU PERMAI 3,087 115/00/07
    [Show full text]
  • Syor-Syor Yang Dicadangkan Bagi Bahagian-Bahagian
    SYOR-SYOR YANG DICADANGKAN BAGI BAHAGIAN-BAHAGIAN PILIHAN RAYA PERSEKUTUAN BAGI WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR SEBAGAIMANA YANG TELAH DIKAJI SEMULA OLEH SURUHANJAYA PILIHAN RAYA DALAM TAHUN 2017 PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FEDERAL CONSTITUENCIES FOR THE FEDERAL TERRITORY OF KUALA LUMPUR AS REVIEWED BY THE ELECTION COMMISSION IN 2017 PERLEMBAGAAN PERSEKUTUAN SEKSYEN 4(a) BAHAGIAN II JADUAL KETIGA BELAS SYOR-SYOR YANG DICADANGKAN BAGI BAHAGIAN-BAHAGIAN PILIHAN RAYA PERSEKUTUAN BAGI WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR SEBAGAIMANA YANG TELAH DIKAJI SEMULA OLEH SURUHANJAYA PILIHAN RAYA DALAM TAHUN 2017 Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya, mengikut kehendak Fasal (2) Perkara 113 Perlembagaan Persekutuan, telah mengkaji semula pembahagian Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur kepada bahagian-bahagian pilihanraya Persekutuan setelah siasatan tempatan kali pertama dijalankan mulai 8 November 2016 hingga 9 November 2016, 23 Disember 2016 dan 28 Februari 2017 di bawah seksyen 5, Bahagian II, Jadual Ketiga Belas, Perlembagaan Persekutuan. 2. Berikutan dengan kajian semula itu, Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya telah memutuskan di bawah seksyen 7, Bahagian II, Jadual Ketiga Belas, Perlembagaan Persekutuan untuk menyemak semula syor-syor yang dicadangkan dan mengesyorkan dalam laporannya syor-syor yang berikut: (a) Tiada perubahan bilangan bahagian-bahagian pilihan raya Persekutuan bagi Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur; dan (b) Tiada pindaan atau perubahan nama kepada bahagian-bahagian pilihan raya Persekutuan dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur. 3. Jumlah bilangan pemilih seramai 788,413 orang dalam Daftar Pemilih semasa iaitu P.U. (B) 217/2016 yang telah diperakui oleh Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya dan diwartakan pada 13 Mei 2016 dan dibaca bersama P.U. (B) 399/2016 bertarikh 6 September 2016 telah diguna pakai bagi maksud kajian semula persempadanan bahagian-bahagian pilihan raya Persekutuan dalam Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur.
    [Show full text]
  • SOALAN LAZIM PENYAKIT NOVEL CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) 15 November 2020
    SOALAN LAZIM PENYAKIT NOVEL CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) 15 November 2020 Soalan 1: Apakah coronavirus? Coronavirus adalah satu keluarga besar virus yang menyebabkan jangkitan saluran pernafasan seperti Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) dan Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-related Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Coronavirus terbaharu dan menjadi pandemik di seluruh dunia kini dikenali sebagai Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). COVID-19 telah mula dikesan di negara China dengan kes pertama disahkan pada 7 Januari 2020 di Wuhan, Hubei, China. Dalam tempoh tiga (3) minggu seterusnya, kes-kes disahkan di Thailand, Nepal, Amerika Syarikat, Korea Selatan, Singapura, Perancis, Vietnam, Malaysia, Australia, Canada, Cambodia, Sri Lanka dan Jerman. Kes pertama di Malaysia disahkan pada 25 Januari 2020. Sehingga kini, penyakit COVID- 19 masih lagi menular di Malaysia. Sejak 20 September 2020, Malaysia sudah memasuki permulaan gelombang ketiga COVID-19 susulan peningkatan mendadak kes jangkitan virus COVID-19. Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia dan pihak berkuasa terus menjalankan program dan aktiviti kawalan dan pencegahan bagi membendung wabak COVID-19 di Malaysia. Soalan 2: Bagaimanakah novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) merebak? Cara penularan novel coronavirus COVID-19 daripada individu kepada individu yang lain adalah melalui titisan dari hidung atau mulut yang tersebar apabila seseorang yang dijangkiti COVID-19 batuk atau bersin. Titisan ini melekat pada objek dan permukaan di sekelilingnya. Orang lain yang menyentuh objek atau permukaan ini mempunyai risiko mendapat jangkitan COVID-19 apabila beliau menyentuh mata, hidung atau 1 mulutnya selepas menyentuh permukaan/objek yang tercemar. Seseorang itu juga boleh dijangkiti COVID-19 jika mereka berada dekat dengan pesakit COVID-19 yang batuk, bersin atau bercakap dalam jarak yang dekat.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuala Lumpur Hospital Address Phone Fax 1 Gleneagles Medical
    Kuala Lumpur Hospital Address Phone Fax 1 Gleneagles Medical Centre 286 Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur 603-4257 1300 603-4257 9233, 603-4257 2933 2 Pantai Hospital Ampang Jalan Perubatan 1, Pandan Indah, 55100 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan 603-42892828 603-42892829 3 Pantai Hospital Cheras No.1, Jalan 1/96A, Taman Cheras Makmur, 56100 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan 603-91322022 603-91320687 4 Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur 8 Jalan Bukit Pantai, 59100 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan 603-2296 0888 603-2282 1557 5 KPJ Tawakkal Specialist Hospital No.1, Jalan Pahang Barat, 53000 Kuala Lumpur 603-40267777 603-40238063 6 Hospital Pakar Al Islam No.85, Jalan Raja Abdullah, Kampung Baru, 50300 Kuala Lumpur 603-26931007 603-26925546 7 Columbia Asia Hospital Setapak No.1, Jalan Danau Saujana, Off Jalan Genting Klang, 53300 Kualu Lumpur 603-41459999 603-41459998 8 Hospital Pusrawi Sdn Bhd Lot 149, Jalan Tun Razak, 50400 Kuala Lumpur 603-26875000 603-26875001 9 Park City Medical Centre No.2, Jalan Inti Sari Perdana, Desa Parkcity, 52200 Kuala Lumpur 603-62793372 603-62793399 10 KPJ Sentosa Medical Centre No.36, Jalan Chemur, Kompleks Damai, 50400 Kuala Lumpur 603-40437166 603-40437761 11 Prince Court Medical Centre No.39, Jalan Kia Peng, 50450 Kuala Lumpur 603-21600000 603-21600710 12 Institut Jantung Negara No.145, Jalan Tun Razak, 50400 Kuala Lumpur 603-26178200 603-26925609 13 International Eye Specialist Centre Level 7 & 8, Centrepoint South, The Boulevard, MId Valley City, 59200 Kuala Lumpur 603-22848989 603-22823090 14 HSC Medical Centre 3A-1, Menara HSC, 187, Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur 603-27120866 603-27120766 15 UM Specialist Centre UMSC Building, Lot 28, Jalan Universiti, 50603 Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur 603-78414000 603-79561788 16 UKM Specialist Centre Tingkat 7, Blok Klinikal, Hospital UKM, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Batu 9, Cheras, 56000 Kuala Lumpur 603-91710141 603-91712837 17 Cardiac Vascular Sentral Kuala Lumpur (CVSKL) Jalan Stesen Sentral 5, Kuala Lumput Sentral, 50470 Kuala Lumpur 603-22767000 603-22767012 18 Cengild G.I.
    [Show full text]
  • (06.06.2021 – 12.06.2021) Jadual
    SITUASI SEMASA PENYAKIT BAWAAN VEKTOR DI KUALA LUMPUR DAN PUTRAJAYA Bagi Minggu Epid 23/2021 (06.06.2021 – 12.06.2021) JADUAL 1: PERBANDINGAN KUMULATIF KES DENGGI KUALA LUMPUR DAN PUTRAJAYA PADA MINGGU EPID 23/2021 (2020 VS. 2021) Jumlah Kes Perbezaan Bil. Zon Perbezaan Kes Sehingga Sehingga (%) ME23/2020 ME23/2021 1 Kuala Lumpur 4,676(5) 1,312(1) -3,364 -71.9 2 Putrajaya 324 41 -283 -87.3 Kuala Lumpur & 5,000(5) 1,353(1) -3,647 -72.9 Putrajaya Nota: ( ) Bilangan Kematian Purata Kes Mingguan : 59 JADUAL 2: KES DENGGI DILAPORKAN MENGIKUT PEJABAT KESIHATAN PADA MINGGU EPID 23/2021 Jumlah Kes Jumlah Kes Peratus Pejabat Minggu 22/2021 Minggu 23/2021 Bil. Parlimen Sehingga (%) Kesihatan 30.05.2021 06.06.2021 Minggu Kes Hingga Hingga 23/2021 05.06.2021 12.06.2021 Cheras 4 6 1 Cheras 9 9 236 17.5 Bdr Tun Razak 5 3 Lembah Pantai 7 4 Lembah 2 Bkt Bintang 14 24 6 14 368 27.2 Pantai Seputeh 3 4 Kepong 1 2 3 Kepong Segambut 7 10 11 20 313(1) 23.1 Batu 2 7 Setiawangsa 1 2 4 Titiwangsa Titiwangsa 13 22 16 25 395 29.2 Wangsa Maju 8 7 5 Putrajaya Putrajaya 1 1 0 0 41 3 Kuala Lumpur & Putrajaya 66 68 1,353(1) Nota: ( ) Bilangan Kematian JADUAL 3: KES DENGGI DI LAPORKAN PADA MINGGU EPID 23/2021 Perbezaan Bilangan Kes dan kematian Jumlah Jumlah peratus dilaporkan terkumpul terkumpul Kadar kenaikan/ Pejabat kes denggi kes denggi insiden Bil. ME 22/2021 ME 23/2021 Penurunan kes Kesihatan sehingga sehingga 2021 30.05.2021Hi 06.06.2021 pada minggu ME ME ngga Hingga epid 2020 dan 23/2020 23/2021 05.06.2021 12.06.2021 2021 (+/-) 1 Cheras 9 9 928(1) 236 -74.6 58 (405,024) 2 Lembah Pantai 24 14 1,211(2) 368 -69.6 75 (488,052) 3 Kepong 10 20 802 313(1) -61 60 (522,000) 4 Titiwangsa 22 25 1,735(2) 395 -77.2 66 (596,700) 5 Putrajaya 1 0 324 41 -87.3 33 (122,890) Kuala Lumpur & Putrajaya 66 68 5,000(5) 1,353(1) -72.9 63 (2,134,666) Nota: Kadar Insiden (IR) bagitahun 2020 adalah 498 : ( ) Bilangan Kematian JADUAL 4: BILANGAN WABAK DENGGI DI KUALA LUMPUR DAN PUTRAJAYA PADA MINGGU EPID 23/2021 Bilangan Wabak Mengikut Kumulatif Wabak Sehingga Jumlah Wabak Pejabat ME 23/2021 ME 23/2021 Bil.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenyataan Akhbar Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia
    KENYATAAN AKHBAR KEMENTERIAN KESIHATAN MALAYSIA SITUASI SEMASA JANGKITAN PENYAKIT CORONAVIRUS 2019 (COVID-19) DI MALAYSIA 11 JULAI 2021 Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia (KKM) ingin memaklumkan status terkini kes COVID-19 di Malaysia sehingga 11 Julai 2021 (jam 12:00 tengah hari); • Kes sembuh : 5,194 kes (742,297 kes kumulatif, 88.8%); • Kes baharu : 9,105 kes (836,296 kes kumulatif); • Kes import : 18 kes (8 warganegara, 10 bukan warganegara); • Kes tempatan : 9,087 kes [7,438 warganegara (81.9%); 1,649 bukan warganegara (18.1%)]; • Kes aktif : 87,841 kes; • Kes yang memerlukan rawatan di Unit Rawatan Rapi (ICU): 961 kes; • Kes memerlukan bantuan pernafasan : 455 kes; • Kes kematian : 91 kes (6,158 kes kumulatif, 0.74%; 86 warganegara, 5 bukan warganegara); • Jumlah kluster : 3,077 kluster; • Jumlah kluster baharu : 19 kluster; • Jumlah kluster yang telah tamat : 2,212 kluster; dan • Jumlah kluster aktif : 865 kluster. Sebanyak 91 kes kematian pada hari ini yang melibatkan 34 kes di Selangor, 21 kes di Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, 12 kes Negeri Sembilan, lapan (8) kes di Melaka, enam (6) kes di Johor, tiga (3) kes di Pahang, dua (2) kes di Kelantan, serta masing-masing satu (1) kes di Sarawak, Pulau Pinang, Perak, Kedah, dan Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan. Perincian jumlah kes mengikut negeri, kes-kes kematian dan kluster-kluster baharu adalah seperti di Lampiran 1, 2, 3 dan 4 yang disertakan bersama kenyataan media ini. KADAR KEBOLEHJANGKITAN COVID-19 ATAU R0/RT (STATUS SEHINGGA 10 JULAI 2021) Berdasarkan data terkini pada 10 Julai 2021, nilai RT Malaysia adalah sebanyak 1.13. Negeri yang mencatatkan nilai RT yang tertinggi adalah Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya (nilai RT 1.20).
    [Show full text]
  • Covid19 Sitrep Mys 20201206.Pdf
    Malaysia Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report Weekly report for the week ending 6 December 2020 Malaysia Situation summary As of 6 December 2020, there have been a total of 72 694 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Malaysia. In the past week, 8209 new cases have been reported, a 15.5% decrease of cases compared to the previous week. Of the new cases reported, only 32 (0.4%) were imported. In the past week, 25 new deaths have been reported, bringing the total number of COVID-19 deaths in Malaysia to 382. Upcoming events and priorities The National Disaster Management Agency (NADMA) is prepared to re-activate the low-risk COVID- 19 quarantine and treatment centre at the Malaysia Agro Exposition Park Serdang (MAEPS) if needed. The opening of the centre will be subject to the decision of the Ministry of Health (MOH). The MOH has rejected the proposal for a green work bubble to allow factory workers who have tested negative and are still undergoing their 14-day quarantine to return to work early. Authorities are currently reviewing data to evaluate the need to shorten mandatory quarantine periods for international travellers into Malaysia. Selangor state government has established three initiatives to curb the spread of COVID-19 in the state. It includes: o Isolating Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) cargo workers. o Identifying five locations to open low-risk COVID-19 quarantine and treatment centres. o Increasing coordination with district health officers to expedite foreign workers’ screenings. The MOH has spent an estimated total of RM 1.17 billion on the nation’s fight against COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • KL Mayor, Please Hear the People! Visiting the Familes of Siddik And
    Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate Lembah Pantai Newsletter ­ the latest news from YB Nurul Izzah, MP for Lembah Pantai ­ 24th Sept 2012 23 October 2012 Issue 7 Support Nurul Izzah Be a Polling Agent/Counting Agent for GE13 Donate to: 'Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai' A/C: 5641 2834 5008 Maybank ­ Bangsar Baru Upcoming Programmes 23 Oct, 8pm ­ forum on current political issues, Kompleks Mutiara, Batu 3, Jalan Ipoh KL Mayor, please hear the people! 27 Oct, 8am ­ qurban ceremony at Balai Islam Bukit Fri, 19 Oct ­ YB Nurul Izzah and YB Fong Kui Lun (MP for B, Kerinchi Bukit Bintang) today went to Brickfields despite the heavy 8 Nov, 8pm ­ Lembah Pantai downpour to be with the traders there who are extremely Deepavali celebrations, Little worried and displeased with the latest orders from DBKL India barring them from setting up tents in front of their premises in conjunction with the upcoming Deepavali celebrations. The traders are also very upset that DBKL has used a different system this year ­ the direct ballot ­ to distribut lots for traders Follow Nurul Izzah on for Deepavali. Facebook The KL Mayor is thereby urged to at least hear these traders Twitter out, even if he does not wish to meet with the KL MPs. Read more here. Visiting the familes of Siddik and Razak Sat, 20 Oct ­ This past week saw two deaths in the families of YB Nurul Izzah's ardent supporters in Pantai Dalam, namely the mother­in­law of Siddik Ibrahim, who is the Deputy Chief of KEADILAN Lembah Pantai, and the stepmother of saudara Razak of Bukit Angkasa.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Pos Laju Ezibox Ezudrive-Thru Pos Laju Bil
    LIST OF POS LAJU EZIBOX EZUDRIVE-THRU POS LAJU BIL. STATE ADDRESS (EDT) Kuala Jln Terminal Putra, Taman Melati, 1 EziBox@LRT Gombak Lumpur 53100 Kuala Lumpur EziBox@Kiosk E- E-Commerce Kiosk, Level 1, Kuala 2 Commerce Hub Kompleks Dayabumi, Jln Tan Cheng Lumpur Dayabumi Lock, 50670 KL Kuala EziBox@POJln Jln Gombak, 53000 Kuala Lumpur, 3 Lumpur Gombak Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur Jln Cerdas, Taman Connaught, Kuala EziBox@Shell Tmn 4 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Lumpur Connaught Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur Kuala EziBox@POSungai Jln Pejabat Pos, Sungai Besi, 57000 5 Lumpur Besi Kuala Lumpur. Jln. Tun Sambanthan, Kuala Lumpur, Kuala EziBox@Pos Laju Brickfields, 50470 Kuala Lumpur, 6 Lumpur Kuala Lumpur Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Jln Klang Lama, Taman Lian Hoe, Kuala EziBox@POJln Klang 7 58100 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Lumpur Lama Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur JKR, 1693, Jln Besar, Jinjang Utara, Kuala 8 EziBox@POJinjang 52000 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Lumpur Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur Shell Wangsa Maju Jalan 34-26 Pt Kuala EziBox@Shell Wangsa 6559,Sector C7, r13, Wangsa Maju, 9 Lumpur Maju 53300 Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Kepong Village Mall, 3, Jln 7a/62a, Kuala EziBox@Tesco Taman Manjalara, 52200 Kuala 10 Lumpur Kepong Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur Kuala EziBox@Shell Sri Off Jln Bukit Kiara, 50480 Kuala 11 Lumpur Hartamas Lumpur, Wilayah Perseketuan PO Universiti Malaya, Dewan Perdana Kuala EziBox@POUniversiti Siswa Jln Lembah Pantai, 59100 12 Lumpur Malaya Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Jln Tuanku
    [Show full text]
  • PRESS STATEMENT MINISTRY of HEALTH MALAYSIA UPDATES on the CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) SITUATION in MALAYSIA 23 October
    PRESS STATEMENT MINISTRY OF HEALTH MALAYSIA UPDATES ON THE CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) SITUATION IN MALAYSIA 23 October 2020 Current Status of Confirmed COVID-19 Cases Who Have Recovered The Ministry of Health (MOH) is pleased to inform that today Malaysia reported 467 COVID-19 recovery cases. Therefore, cumulatively, 15,884 confirmed COVID-19 cases have been discharged (64.8% of total cumulative cases). The breakdown of cases that have recovered by state is as follows: • Sabah (246 cases) • Selangor (105 cases) • Kedah (74 cases) • Pulau Pinang (24 cases) • Melaka (7 cases) • Terengganu (4 cases) • Johor (4 cases) • Sarawak (1 case) • Negeri Sembilan (1 case) • Pahang (1 case) Current Situation of COVID-19 in Malaysia Today, Sabah continues to report the highest number of cases at 528 cases (74.4%). This is the result of intensive active case detection carried out in Sabah. The mobilisation of healthcare workers has aided screening efforts in the field as well as delivery of medical treatment. Logistics for sample delivery have also been improved and helped improve turnaround time for RT-PCR tests results. Meanwhile, the states in the Klang Valley reported an additional 73 cases (10.3% of the total cases). Of these, 34 cases (46.6%) are from existing and new clusters. These states as well as Sabah have already been placed under the Conditional Movement Control Order (CMCO). A total of 180 cases (25.4%) reported today are from the Penjara Kepayan Cluster (140 cases), Penjara Reman Cluster (39 cases), and the Tembok Cluster (1 case). One (1) case today was a returnee from Sabah, which makes the number of cases reported to have a history of travel to Sabah since 20 September 2020 is 466 cases.
    [Show full text]