DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 41/Tuesday, March 2, 2004/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 69, No. 41/Tuesday, March 2, 2004/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 2, 2004 / Notices 9839 complete program announcement and species. That is, the projects we seek to accessed by visiting Grants.gov request for proposals (Notice of support should reflect new starts and (www.grants.gov). Grants.gov is the new Availability of Federal Assistance), should not fund management efforts single point of entry for posting Federal potential applicants were provided with already in place or ongoing.’’ Government grant and other assistance a set of minimum eligibility criteria. The January 6, 2004, notice also stated opportunities. Potential applicants for One of the eligibility criteria could be that project proposals must be received the PSGP may access program overview read to exclude projects on lands owned by the appropriate Regional Office information, the full text of the by conservation organizations from within 60 days of the notice. Due to the announcement, and the application eligibility for funding under the PSGP. need to revise and clarify the eligibility package for this request for proposals by We are now revising the eligibility criteria, and due to substantial interest accessing Grants.gov and then using the requirements to clarify, and correctly by the public in participating in this FIND utility (‘‘Find Grant notice, that projects on lands owned by program, we are now extending the due Opportunities,’’ or http://fedgrants.gov/ conservation organizations are eligible date for submission of project proposals grants/servlet/SearchServlet/) to access for funding through the PSGP. for Federal assistance under the Private this information. Potential applicants Specifically, section III (Eligibility Stewardship Grants Program (PSGP) to may use the FIND utility by searching Information), part 3 (Other), item 2, is March 31, 2004. for the PSGP either by entering the title revised now to read as follows: ‘‘The ‘‘Private Stewardship Grants Program’’ How To Apply for a PSGP Grant project must be on land that is privately or by using the PSGP’s Catalog of owned and must entail new or changed A complete program announcement Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) management that benefits the target and request for proposals may be number of 15.632. TABLE 1.—WHERE TO SEND PROJECT PROPOSALS AND LIST OF REGIONAL CONTACTS Regional PSGP con- Service region States or territory where the project will occur Where to send your PSGP project proposal tact and phone num- ber Region 1 ...................... Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Amer- Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Heather Hollis ican Samoa, Guam, and Commonwealth of Service, Eastside Federal Complex, 911 (503/231–6241) the Northern Mariana Islands. NE. 11th Avenue, Portland, OR 97232– 4181. Region 1 ...................... California and Nevada .................................... Office Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv- Michael Fris ice, Federal Building, 2800 Cottage Way, (916/414–6464) Room W–2606, Sacramento, CA 95825– 1846. Region 2 ...................... Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Mike McCollum Service, 500 Gold Avenue, SW., Room (817/277–1100) 4012, Albuquerque, NM 87102. Region 3 ...................... Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Peter Fasbender Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Service, Bishop Henry Whipple Federal (612/713–5343) Building, One Federal Drive, Fort Snelling, MN 55111–4056. Region 4 ...................... Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Ken- Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Mike Gantt tucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Caro- Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, Suite (404/679–7081) lina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Puerto 200, Atlanta, GA 30345. Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Region 5 ...................... Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Diane Lynch Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Service, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Had- (413/253–8628) Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Penn- ley, MA 01035–9589. sylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia. Region 6 ...................... Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Pat Mehlhop Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. Service, P.O. Box 25486, Denver Federal (303/236–7400 ext. Center, Denver, CO 80225–0486. 225) Region 7...................... Alaska ............................................................. Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Michael Roy Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, Anchor- (907/786–3925) age, AK 99503–6199. Authority: This notice is published under DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR for approval under the provisions of the the authority of the Department of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Geological Survey Chapter 35). Copies of the proposed Act, 2004, H.R. 2691/Pub. L.108–108. collection of information may be Dated: February 25, 2004. Request for Public Comments on obtained by contacting the Bureau’s Proposed Information Collection To Be Craig Manson, clearance officer at the phone number Submitted to the Office of Management listed below. Comments and suggestions Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and and Budget for Review Under the on the proposal should be made within Parks. Paperwork Reduction Act [FR Doc. 04–4686 Filed 2–27–04; 12:01 pm] 60 days directly to the Bureau clearance officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 807 BILLING CODE 4310–55–P The proposed information collection described below will be submitted to National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley the Office of Management and Budget VerDate jul<14>2003 15:10 Mar 01, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM 02MRN1 9840 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 41 / Tuesday, March 2, 2004 / Notices Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192, or e-mail DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Houston County ([email protected]). New Perry Hotel, 800 Main St., Perry, Specific public comments are National Park Service 04000241. requested as to: National Register of Historic Places; Muscogee County 1. Whether the collection of Notification of Pending Nominations Lewis–Rothchild Building, (Columbus MRA), information is necessary for the proper 1214 First Ave., Columbus, 04000239. performance of the functions on the Nominations for the following Reich Dry Goods Company, (Columbus MRA), 14 W 11th St., Columbus, 04000240. bureaus, including whether the properties being considered for listing information will have practical utility; in the National Register were received IOWA by the National Park Service before The accuracy of the bureau’s estimate Hardin County of the burden of the collection of February 21, 2004. Pursuant to § 60.13 information, including the validity of of 36 CFR part 60 written comments Steamboat Rock Consolidated Schools concerning the significance of these Building, 306 W. Market St., Steamboat the methodology and assumptions used: Rock, 04000243. 3. The quality, utility, and clarity of properties under the National Register the information to be collected; and criteria for evaluation may be forwarded KENTUCKY by United States Postal Service, to the Barren County 4. How to minimize the burden of the National Register of Historic Places, collection of information on those who National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., Ralph Bunche Historic District, Roughly bound by E. College St., Landrum St., are to respond, including the use of 2280, Washington, DC 20240; by all appropriate automated, electronic, Twyman Court and S. Lewis St., Glasgow, other carriers, National Register of 04000247. mechanical, or other forms of Historic Places, National Park Service, information technology. 1201 Eye St., NW., 8th floor, Bourbon County Title: Public perceptions of Bats in Washington, DC 20005; or by fax, 202– Little Rock–Jackstown Road Rural Historic Fort Collins, Colorado. 371–6447. Written or faxed comments District, along Little Rock-Jackstown and Soper Rds., Little Rock, 04000246. OMB Approval No: New collection. should be submitted by March 17, 2004. Fayette County Abstract: The primary objective of Carol D. Shull, African Cemetery No. 2, 419 E. Seventh St., this information collection is to Keeper of the National Register of Historic Lexington, 04000245. investigate public perceptions, Places. knowledge, and awareness of bats and Jefferson County ALABAMA how this could influence potential Virginia Avenue Colored School, 3628 transmission of disease (i.e., from bats to De Kalb County Virginia Ave., Louisville, 04000244. bats, bats to pets, bat to humans). A Larmore, Vance C., House, 810 Cty Rd. 606, random sample of Fort Collins, Hammondville, 04000232. MASSACHUSETTS Colorado residents and a sample of Middlesex County Jefferson County identified residents known to have had Alewife Brook Parkway, (Metropolitan Park Rosedale Historic District, Roughly bounded an encounter with a bat will be asked System of Greater Boston MPS), Alewife by 25th Court S, Central Ave., 27th Court about these bat-related issues via a Brook Parkway, Cambridge, 04000249. questionnaire. This information is a S., Loveless/BM Montgomery St., vital component for managing bats and Homewood, 04000236. Norfolk County developing effective communications Rosedale Park Historic District, Roughly Furnace Brook Parkway, (Metropolitan Park bounded by Woodcrest Place, 26th Ave. S, System of Greater Boston MPS), Furnace protocols regarding bat disease and 18th St. S, and 25th Ct. S, Homewood,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4: Regionwide Needs Assessment
    REGIONWIDE 4 NEEDS ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION A critical early step in developing the LRTP is to gather, organize, and analyze available sources of data about the transportation system. This allows the MPO to understand the many needs that exist for all transportation modes. After analyzing data included in the Web-based Needs Assessment described in Chapter 1, it is clear that the region has extensive maintenance and modernization requirements, including the need to address safety and mobility for all modes. MPO staff estimates that these needs likely would exceed the region’s anticipated financial resources between now and 2040. Therefore, the MPO must prioritize the region’s needs in order to guide investment decisions. This chapter provides an overview of the MPO region’s transportation needs for the next twenty-five years. The information in this chapter has been organized according to the LRTP’s goals—which are used to evaluate projects in the Universe of Projects List both for scenario planning, and then project selection for the recommended LRTP. The LRTP’s goals are related to: • Safety • System Preservation • Capacity Management and Mobility • Clean Air and Clean Communities • Transportation Equity • Economic Vitality Information in each goal-based section of this chapter falls into these general categories: • The goals and related objectives • Background information for each goal • The policy context that surrounds each goal, which includes: 1. Initiatives and directives that shape the goal and related needs. Detailed information about each of the policies is included in Appendix A. 2. Relevant studies, reports, and documents that help the MPO understand the region’s transportation needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Metropolitan District Commission
    Public Document No. 48 W$t Commontoealtfj of iWa&sacfmsfetta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Metropolitan District Commission For the Year 1935 Publication or this Document Approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance lm-5-36. No. 7789 CONTENTS PAGE I. Organization and Administration . Commission, Officers and Employees . II. General Financial Statement .... III. Parks Division—Construction Wellington Bridge Nonantum Road Chickatawbut Road Havey Beach and Bathhouse Garage Nahant Beach Playground .... Reconstruction of Parkways and Boulevards Bridge Repairs Ice Breaking in Charles River Lower Basin Traffic Control Signals IV. Maintenance of Parks and Reservations Revere Beach Division .... Middlesex Fells Division Charles River Lower Basin Division . Bunker Hill Monument .... Charles River Upper Division Riverside Recreation Grounds . Blue Hills Division Nantasket Beach Reservation Miscellaneous Bath Houses Band Concerts Civilian Conservation Corps Federal Emergency Relief Activities . Public Works Administration Cooperation with the Municipalities . Snow Removal V. Special Investigations VI. Police Department VII. Metropolitan Water District and Works Construction Northern High Service Pipe Lines . Reinforcement of Low Service Pipe Lines Improvements for Belmont, Watertown and Arlington Maintenance Precipitation and Yield of Watersheds Storage Reservoirs .... Wachusett Reservoir . Sudbury Reservoir Framingham Reservoir, No. 3 Ashland, Hopkinton and Whitehall Reservoirs and South Sud- bury Pipe Lines and Pumping Station Framingham Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 and Farm Pond Lake Cochituate . Aqueducts Protection of the Water Supply Clinton Sewage Disposal Works Forestry Hydroelectric Service Wachusett Station . Sudbury Station Distribution Pumping Station Distribution Reservoirs . Distribution Pipe Lines . T) 11 P.D. 48 PAGE Consumption of Water . 30 Water from Metropolitan Water Works Sources used Outside of the Metropolitan Water District VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Hammond Pond Parkway Reconstruction 25% Public Meeting Meeting Logistics
    Hammond Pond Parkway Reconstruction 25% Public Meeting Meeting Logistics • Two ways to ask questions during the meeting​ • Raise your hand • Use Q&A feature​ • You will have the opportunity to submit comments over the course of the next four weeks at: • DCR Public Comments​ https://www.mass.gov/forms/dcr-public-comments • Please note that this meeting will be recorded; the recording will be a public record​ Commonwealth of Massachusetts Governor Charles D. Baker Lieutenant Governor Karyn E. Polito Energy and Environmental Secretary Kathleen A. Theoharides Department of Conservation and Recreation Commissioner Jim Montgomery Project Team Department of Conservation and Recreation Project Proponent – Responsible for design process & construction funding City of Newton Project Stakeholder – Responsible for coordination with public outreach BSC Group Design Consultant – Roadway design, landscape architecture and permitting Project Location PROJECT LOCATION Existing Parkway • Existing roadway was built in 1934 • The roadway consists of two lanes in each direction. • Overall length is approximately one mile • Roadway crosses over D Branch of the MBTA’s Green Line on a single span bridge • Three signalized intersections within project limits • Coordination with MassDOT required for modifications to bridge and minor improvements at Route 9 • Limited sidewalks and bicycle accommodation Project Goals • Redesign Hammond Pond Parkway as a “complete street” gem in the DCR parkway system • Provide safe bicycle and pedestrian accommodation along parkway
    [Show full text]
  • Weight and Height Restrictions That Impact Truck Travel
    ON REG ST IO O N B BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION M Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chair E N T R O I Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director, MPO Staff O T P A O IZ LMPOI N TA A N G P OR LANNING TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: December 21, 2017 TO: Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization FROM: William S. Kuttner RE: Weight and Height Restrictions that Impact Truck Travel 1 INTRODUCTION This memorandum presents information about bridges in the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) area that have signs restricting the weight or height of vehicles permitted to pass over or under them. MassDOT personnel monitor these weight and height restrictions, along with a bridge’s physical condition, or rating, and summarize them as inspection reports in MassDOT’s internal database. However, the physical condition or rating of bridges is not the direct concern of this study. The concern of this study is that truck restrictions cause trucks that are otherwise fully compliant with Massachusetts and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) size guidelines to use more circuitous routes than necessary to reach their various commercial destinations. Forced circuitous truck travel increases expenses for freight carriers and customers, increases the total environmental impact for a given level of freight traffic, and increases the negative impacts on local residents and communities. This study characterizes the severity of height and weight restrictions on trucks in the MPO region. The information developed will be used to evaluate projects considered for inclusion in two MPO planning documents: the Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
    [Show full text]
  • Find It and Fix It Stormwater Program in the Charles and Mystic River Watersheds
    FIND IT AND FIX IT STORMWATER PROGRAM IN THE CHARLES AND MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHEDS FINAL REPORT JUNE 2005 - AUGUST 2008 October 29, 2008 SUBMITTED TO: MASSACHUSETTS ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF GRANTS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 100 CAMBRIDGE STREET, 9TH FLOOR BOSTON, MA 02114 SUBMITTED BY: CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION 190 PARK ROAD 20 ACADEMY STREET, SUITE 203 WESTON, MA 02493 ARLINGTON, MA 02476 Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 6 Organization of Report ................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROGRAM BACKGROUND............................................................................................ 9 1.1 Charles River.................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.1 Program Study Area................................................................................................ 9 1.1.2 Water Quality Issues............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Report | Dept. of Conservation and Recreation, MA
    Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Municipality/Organization: Department of Conservation and Recreation EPA NPDES Permit Number: MAR043001 MaDEP Transmittal Number: Annual Report Number & Reporting Period: No. 6: May 08-April 09 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES PII Small MS4 General Permit Annual Report Part I. General Information Contact Person: Robert Lowell Title: Storm Water Manager Telephone #: (617) 626-1340 Email: [email protected] Certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Signature: Printed Name: Richard K. Sullivan Title: Commissioner Date: 9/7/2010 Page 1 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Part II. Self-Assessment The Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) has completed the required self-assessment and has determined that we are in compliance with all permit conditions, except as noted in the following tables. DCR received authorization to discharge under the general permit from EPA on November 8, 2007 and from DEP on November 21, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGE of DATE Improvements to Hammond Pond Parkway in Newton Thursday, January 21, 2021 7:00Pm – 8:30Pm
    Department of Conservation and Recreation Commonwealth of Massachusetts NOTICE: CHANGE OF DATE Improvements to Hammond Pond Parkway in Newton Thursday, January 21, 2021 7:00pm – 8:30pm Register here: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_dWYruP09RVC1x3luBVMtyw At this public meeting, the DCR team for this project and its engineering design consultant, BSC Group, will present project objectives and gather public input on preliminary design to inform a pedestrian- and bike-friendly redesign of Hammond Pond Parkway in Newton, from Boylston Street (Route 9) to Beacon Street. To register, click on the appropriate link above or enter it into your browser, and you will be prompted to submit your name and email. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. This information cannot be shared, the participation link is unique to you. If you need assistance when registering, please contact Jennifer Norwood at [email protected]. After the presentation, the public will be invited to ask questions and provide feedback on the proposed design, using Q&A functionality that will be available through the virtual participation platform. After the meeting, the presentation will be available for viewing at https://www.mass.gov/dcr/past-public-meetings. DCR encourages the public to share additional feedback, with a deadline for receipt of comments by DCR of Thursday, February 4, 2021. Comments may be submitted online at www.mass.gov/dcr/public-comment. Please note that the content of comments you submit to DCR, along with your name, town, and zip code, will be posted on DCR's website.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Outreach for Destination 2040
    appendix D Public Outreach for Destination 2040 INTRODUCTION Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff conducted outreach activities throughout the development of the Destination 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Outreach began in October 2017 with the development of the Needs Assessment and continued through the 30-day public comment period for the draft LRTP in July and August 2019. This appendix summarizes the outreach activities and public input received during the different phases of LRTP development: Needs Assessment, vision, goals and objectives revisions, and project and program selection. It concludes with the comments received during the formal 30-day public comment period for the draft LRTP. The MPO engaged a wide variety of individuals in the development of Destination 2040, including: • Regional Transportation Advisory Council (Advisory Council) • Municipalities • Transportation agencies, including the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), and regional transit authorities • Professional groups (for example, planners, and engineers, etc.) • Community organizations • Transportation equity groups • Economic development and business organizations • Transportation and environmental advocates MPO staff used a variety of communication and engagement methods to engage the public and solicit feedback from the community: • In-person meetings with the Advisory Council, the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) subregional groups, stakeholder
    [Show full text]
  • Site Location and Proposed Development
    To: Mr. Geoff Whitehouse Date: November 9, 2020 MME Newton Retail, LLC 10115 Jefferson Blvd Culver, CA 90232 Project #:14559.00 From: Randall C. Hart, Principal Re: Traffic Impact and Access Memorandum Matthew Duranleau, EIT Proposed Recreational Marijuana Dispensary 232 Boylston Street Newton, Massachusetts VHB has conducted a traffic assessment to determine the suitability and potential impacts of a recreational marijuana dispensary (the Project) at 232 Boylston Street (Route 9) in Newton, Massachusetts (the Site). Specifically, the Project involves the conversion of an existing jewelry store into a recreational marijuana dispensary. This memorandum includes an evaluation of the existing traffic operations and safety; assessment of future conditions without the Project; an estimate of projected traffic volumes for the Project; and its potential impact on future traffic operations in the area. Site Location and Proposed Development The Site is located at 232 Boylston Street (Route 9) in Newton, Massachusetts. The Site currently includes one building of approximately 5,484 square feet (sf) formerly occupied by the Shreve, Crump & Low jewelry store. The Project includes renovations to the building that will reduce the gross square footage of the proposed recreational marijuana dispensary to approximately 4,825 sf. The Site is located adjacent to the Capital Grille restaurant to the west and the mixed-use Chestnut Hill Square development to the east and south and is connected internally to these two parcels via a driveway on the south side of the Site. Under Existing conditions, the Site is accessed via an entrance-only driveway to the west of the building on Route 9 eastbound that is shared with the Capital Grille, as well as a full-access driveway to the east that is shared with Chestnut Hill Square.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Conservation & Recreation, Boston, MA | 2014
    Department of Conservation and Recreation dC r NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Municipality/Organization: Department of Conservation and Recreation EPA NPDES Permit Number: MARO43001 MaDEP Transmittal Number: Annual Report Number & Reporting Period: No. 11: April 2013— March 2014 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES P11 Small MS4 General Permit Annual Report ) Part I. General Information Contact Person: Robert Lowell Title: Environmental Section Chief Telephone #: (617) 626-1340 Email: [email protected] Certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction olsupervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on myinquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathing the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant pealties for submitting false information, includin the possibility of fine and imprisonment r knowing violations. Signature: Printed Name: John P. Murray Title: Commissioner Date: 30 2o ‘— 5/1/2014 Pa2e2 Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report For Coverage Under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) Department of Conservation and Recreation 251 Causeway Street Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114-2104 Submittal: May 1, 2014 5/1/2014 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Municipality/Organization: Department of Conservation and Recreation EPA NPDES Permit Number: MAR043001 MaDEP Transmittal Number: Annual Report Number & Reporting Period: No.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Real Property Owned and Leased by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office for Administration and Finance Report on the Real Property Owned and Leased by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Published February 15, 2019 Prepared by the Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance Carol W. Gladstone, Commissioner This page was intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Report Organization 5 Table 1 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 11 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 2 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by County 17 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 3 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office and Agency 23 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 4 Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Site and Municipality 85 Total land acreage, buildings (number and square footage), improvements (number and area) Includes State and Authority-owned buildings Table 5 Commonwealth Active Lease Agreements by Municipality 303 Private leases through DCAMM on behalf of state agencies APPENDICES Appendix I Summary of Commonwealth-Owned Real Property by Executive Office 311 Version of Table 1 above but for State-owned only (excludes Authorities) Appendix II County-Owned Buildings Occupied by Sheriffs and the Trial Court 319 Appendix III List of Conservation/Agricultural/Easements Held by the Commonwealth 323 Appendix IV Data Sources 381 Appendix V Glossary of Terms 385 Appendix VI Municipality Associated Counties Index Key 393 3 This page was intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]