DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Neponset River Reservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Neponset River Reservation A Master Plan for the Lower Neponset River Reservation Boston, Milton, and Quincy, Massachusetts A Master Plan for the Lower Neponset River Reservation Boston, Milton, and Quincy, Massachusetts Commonwealth of Massachusetts Metropolitan District Commission William E Weld David B. Balfour, Jr. Governor Commissioner Argeo Paul Cellucci Darryl Settles Lieutenant Governor Avril Elkort Trudy Coxe Charles E Wu Secretary, Robert Carr .Executive Office ofEnvironmental Affairs Associate Commissioners Leo Roy Julia B. O'Brien Undersecretary, Director ofPlanning .Executive Office ofEnvironmental Affairs David T. Queeley Project Manager December 1996 Master Plan Consultants Planners Collaborative Inc. Planners and Landscape Architects in association with Camp Dresser & McKee Environmental Engineers Judith Nitsch Engineering Land Surveyors Main Street Design Interpretive and Environmental Graphic Designers Wallace Roberts and Todd Planners and Landscape Architects Table of Contents Introduction 1 The Plan Pope John Paul II Park 7 The Riverside 10 The Bend 15 The Port 18 Squantum Point Park 20 Edgewater Park 22 Neponset River Trail 24 Trail Connections 31 Watercourse 33 Funding, Costs, and Phasing 34 Public Safety, Maintenance, & Mitigation 37 Permits 41 Preliminary Design Drawings: A-1 Neponset River Trail 60STON HARBOR N!PONHf IIVU. ~n,,·tlOl'Ol.fl',1.:- UISTlllC'I' aos-ro.:-- BOS TON 8 A Y ,-- j -~ti· P-­ - v "'w!._ -~:t~~11- ·i-=z jl:rft-~ t ~ .A-,c~,,..,""' Charles Eliot's 1893 Map ofthe Metropolitan Park System with the Neponset River Reservation in Lower Center Introduction This plan is about keeping a promise. eluding rich nature preserves and numerous popular parks. Acquisition of the Neponset Marshes began in 1896, mak­ The promise was made in the late 1800s. Charles Eliot and ing these salt marshes the earliest in the state to be protected Sylvester Baxter, two of the founders ofthe Metropolitan Park as natural assets. In the one hundred years since, the MDC System, alarmed by the hasty pace of Boston's expansion, laid has actively worked to acquire approximately 750 acres along out an idea for a vast, interconnected system ofparks, nature the Neponset. These acquisitions include preserving addi­ reserves, and scenic roadways in and around the city to en­ tional marshlands and upstream shoreline, developing play­ sure chat a wide range of natural and recreation lands would grounds, such as the Ventura and Ryan Playgrounds, and be preserved and enhanced for the future. acquiring formerly used lands, such as an abandoned train line and a closed landfill for reuse for recreation purposes. Eliot and Baxter placed great weight on protecting open space The Neponset Marshes and creating parklands along rivers and streams, especially This plan builds upon the course sec by Eliot and Baxter. the three rivers that flow into Boston Harbor: the Charles, And although roadways and buildings have been conscructed The course stresses the principles of wise land stewardship, the Mystic, and the Neponset. The reason so much impor­ along the river in recent decades, one can still find plenty of ofpreserving sensitive wildlife habitats, of restoring damaged tance was placed on these waterways grew from an awareness places where where the natural course of the river follows a natural areas, and of opening portions of the outdoors for that rivers are vital sources of life. They understood that fluid and unmistakable rhythm. public use and enjoyment. It is a course that has stood the land along streams, when kept in a relatively natural condi­ test of time, and one we can count on co guide us in the tion, helps to keep river water dean, makes ideal habitats for Once, the Neponset River was considered a sacred place by future. fish and wildlife, and becomes sought after places for indi­ everyone who lived near it. We know this because the river viduals and families seeking rest and recreation. In 1893, was given a name by Native Americans who named only In putting this plan into practice, the MDC needs partners. Eliot wrote: "Nature appears to have placed these streams important places. We also know by the choice of its name Neighbors are encouraged to become involved in the project. just where they can best serve the needs of the crowded popu­ that it was special. The name "Neponset" means "Harvest Local nonprofit organizations and business are urged co lations gathering fast about them." River," which referred to the days during the year when Mas­ "adopt" portions of the corridor and new parks. And other sachusetts tribe of the Algonquin Nation feasted off the local, state, and federal agencies are invited to participate. In schools of fish caught in the river, especially in the spring the end, lasting stewardship of this gift of nature will require when the herring and smelts came in from the ocean to hurdle the commitment ofindividuals, the creativity ofgovernment the rapids and spawn in the freshwater that flowed from the and business leaders, and cooperation of all. river's source 27-miles upstream. Cl The river's history as an abundant natural resource contin­ Boston ued well after the Native Americans lived along its shores. Successive generations of Americans settled beside the river BOSTON.MA Ha~rlfo and used it for drinking water, food, irrigation, transporta­ tion, swimming, bathing, industry, and recreation. Today, as a result of Boston's growth as an urban center, more than 130,000 people live within a mile of the lower section of river between Squanrum Point in Quincy, Malibu Beach in Rivers into Boston Harbor Boston, and Manapan Square. Of the three rivers, only the Neponset was never cut off from The river presents us with evidence of the foresight of Eliot the sea by a dam across its mouth. As a result, each day a salty and Baxter, especially in their prediction that natural places stew of river and sea water rises and falls with every changing in and around Boston would become exceedingly scarce. ride. The river's wide and sandy mouth is lined with tall Consistent with that vision, the MDC, since the 1890s has marsh grass that provides a fertile home for fish and wildlife. moved to protect hundreds of acres along the waterway, in- The Neponset River below Mattapan Square Modern Visionaries ing water quality and have assisted the Department of Envi­ Keystone Apartments ronmental Protection in the preparation of the Neponset River Lower Mills Civic Association Many residencs of the Neponset River watershed have long Resource Assessment. Mattapan Family Services Center had a vision of restoring the waterway to a place of promi­ Massachusetts Electric nence in every day life. This plan is a testament to their Boston Natural Areas Fund and Trust for Public Land Port Norfolk Neighborhood Association dedicated support and encouragement of the MDC. Many The Boston Natural Areas Fund (BNAF) as lead community Trustees of the Reservations of the same citizens have worked tirelessly for the funds chat organizer, and Trust for Public Lands (TPL) as the Metro­ will be needed to implement the plan's recommendations. politan District Commission's acquisition partner, together Elected Officials and Agencies The 1996 Open Space Bond Bill, which resulted in $45 mil­ have undertaken a four year citizen-based effort in 1995 co Many ocher individuals, groups, and agencies have provided lion being authorized largely to implemenc chis master plan build public awareness and form constituencies for restoring valuable contributions during the master planning and de­ and carry out certain ocher river corridor projects, further and maintaining the Neponset River. This work has been sign process. A complete description of the public participa­ illustrates the fruits of this dedication and hard work. The supported by the Lila Wallace Readers Digest Fund. The tion process with a list of participants is included in the Ap­ continuing energies ofthese many supporters, some ofwhom project includes development of citizen stewardship through pendix. The following elected officials and agencies have are identified below, will help assure that the promise of this environmental education programs, community workshops, been especially key in developing this master plan. plan is realized in the future. action projects, a Greenway Council, and special events fo­ cusing on the river. BNAF developed the Neponset River Senator Paul White The Neponset Master Plan Citizens Advisory Council Greenway Youth Conservation Program and organized a corps Senator Diane Wilkerson A Citizens Advisory Council (CAC) was established in 1993 of thirty Yourh Conservation workers to construct a foot­ Representative Thomas Finneran by the Metropolitan District Commission to help develop path along the river at Ryan Playground. Representative James Brett the Lower Neponset River Reservation Plan and the Nepon­ Representative Brian Joyce set River Trail. Members of this group representing neigh­ Boston GreenSpace Alliance Represencative Shirley Owens-Hicks borhood and civic associations, watershed and open space The Boston GreenSpace Alliance is a nonprofit membership Representative Joseph Manning advocacy groups, public agencies, as well as individual citi­ organization which advocates for open space and improved zens have participated in chis master planning effort. In­ management of Boston's parks. A few of its activities in­ Executive Office of Environmental Affairs deed, the CAC has been a key force in the creation of this clude: sponsoring education and action programs co plant Dept. of Environmental Management ACEC Program plan. (See the document entitled Master Plan Appendix for and maintain trees, working with schools to promote envi­ Department of Environmental Protection a detailed description of the Public Participation and Inter­ ronmental education, and collaborating with other nonprofits Department of Fisheries, Wildlife,· & Law Enforcement agency Coordination process.) While the CAC served as the and community groups on a variety of environmental im­ Division of Marine Fisheries principal avenue ofpublic participation, several other groups provement projects in Boston and along the Neponset River.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations
    Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Fore River Watershed Mystic River Watershed Neponset River Watershed Weir River Watershed Project Number 2002-02/MWI June 30, 2003 Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Project Number 2002-01/MWI June 30, 2003 Report Prepared by: Ian Cooke, Neponset River Watershed Association Libby Larson, Mystic River Watershed Association Carl Pawlowski, Fore River Watershed Association Wendy Roemer, Neponset River Watershed Association Samantha Woods, Weir River Watershed Association Report Prepared for: Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ellen Roy Herzfelder, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Robert W. Golledge, Jr., Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Cynthia Giles, Assistant Commissioner Division of Municipal Services Steven J. McCurdy, Director Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Project Number 2002-01/MWI July 2001 through June 2003 Report Prepared by: Ian Cooke, Neponset River Watershed Association Libby Larson, Mystic River Watershed Association Carl Pawlowski, Fore River Watershed Association Wendy Roemer, Neponset River Watershed Association Samantha Woods, Weir River Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • Quincy Riverwalk Conceptual Plan 2002
    Neponset Riverwalk, Quincy & East Milton July 2002 Friends of the Neponset Estuary Conceptual Plan Neponset Riverwalk Quincy & East Milton, MA Fig. 1 Billings Creek looking east from Commander Shea Blvd. Friends of the Neponset Estuary Neponset River Watershed Association Partially funded by a grant from Quincy Sons of Italy November 2002 i Neponset Riverwalk, Quincy & East Milton November 2002 Friends of the Neponset Estuary Acknowledgements The Neponset Riverwalk has lived in the imaginations of many people for some time. Many of those who love the Neponset River and the environmental resources of the surrounding areas in Quincy and Milton want to see greater public access to the river and protection of its fragile ecosystem. The recently completed Pope John Paul Park and Neponset Greenway on the west side of the Estuary are excellent examples of achieving the goal of public access, land reclamation, and resource protection. On the east side of the Estuary, the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC) has already created a park at Squantum Point and preserved significant areas of salt marsh in Quincy and Milton. Trails at Squantum Point Park were included in the Neponset Master Plan, but have yet to be constructed (www.mass.gov/mdc/NEP_PLAN.HTM). The Neponset Riverwalk is inspired by these landmark accomplishments. To promote the Riverwalk concept, Quincy Attorney Bryan Stevens, Steve Perdios, Co-chair of the Friends of the Neponset Estuary and the Quincy Environmental Network, Tom Palmer, Board member of the Neponset River Watershed Association (NepRWA) and Friends of the Blue Hills, and Ian Cooke, Executive Director of NepRWA encouraged me to create a conceptual plan and report.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles River Link Trail Guide
    Trail Jewels A goal for the trail was to interconnect open space jewels and maximize off-road travel. Each jewel represents open spaces and places with quiet woods, picturesque views, and scenic attractions. There are 26 jewels along the trail, and the jewels and their administrators, from north to south, are: 1. Mary Hunnewell Fyffe Footbridge and Cordingly Dam, Mass Department of Conservation and Recreation 2. Charles River Reservation, Mass Department of Conservation and Recreation 3. Benjamin Mills Park, Mass Department of Conservation and Recreation 4. Cochituate Aqueduct, Town of Wellesley 5. Ouellet Playground, Town of Wellesley 6. Wellesley Town Forest, Town of Wellesley 7. Longfellow Pond, Town of Wellesley 8. Sudbury Aqueduct, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority CHARLES RIVER LINK 9. Babson College 10. Babson World Globe, Babson College TRAIL GUIDE 11. Olin College 12. Walker Woods, Wellesley Conservation Council www.charlesriverlink.org 13. Beebe Meadow, Town of Wellesley 14. Waban Arches, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority 15. Susan Lee Memorial Sanctuary, Wellesley Conservation Council 16. Guernsey Sanctuary, Wellesley Conservation Council 17. Pegan Hill, The Trustees 18. Lewis Hill, Dover Land Conservation Trust A sixteen-mile, six-town regional trail 19. Mumford Wildlife Forest, New England Forestry Foundation 20. Peters Reservation, The Trustees from Newton to the 21. Chase Woodlands, The Trustees 22. Dover-Sherborn Regional School Bay Circuit Trail in Medfield 23. Medfield State Forest, Mass Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cambridge Csos, Final Permit, MA0101974, 09/30/2009
    Permit No. MA0101974 Page 1 of 8 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. §§1251 et seq., and the Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, as amended, Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 21, §§26-53, the City of Cambridge Department of Public Works 147 Hampshire Street Cambridge, MA 02139 is authorized to discharge from: 12 Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) listed in Attachments A and B to the receiving waters named Alewife Brook and Charles River, both Class B waters with CSO variances, in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth herein. This permit shall become effective on the first day of the calendar month following sixty (60) days after the date of signature. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, five (5) years from the last day of the month preceding the effective date. This permit supersedes the permit issued on March 26, 1993. This permit consists of 8 pages, Attachments A through E in Part I, and 25 pages in Part II, Standard Conditions. Signed this 30th day of SEPTEMBER, 2009 /S/ SIGNATURE ON FILE _______________________________ ____________________________ Lynne Hamjian, Acting Director Glenn Haas, Director Office of Ecosystem Protection Division of Watershed Management Environmental Protection Agency Department of Environmental Protection Region I Commonwealth of Massachusetts Boston, MA Boston, MA Permit No. MA0101974 Page 2 of 8 Part I. EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND OTHER PERMIT CONDITIONS A. Effluent Limitations 1. During wet weather, the permittee is authorized to discharge combined storm water and sanitary wastewater from combined sewer outfalls listed in Attachments A and B, subject to the following effluent limitations and requirements: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Regionwide Needs Assessment
    REGIONWIDE 4 NEEDS ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION A critical early step in developing the LRTP is to gather, organize, and analyze available sources of data about the transportation system. This allows the MPO to understand the many needs that exist for all transportation modes. After analyzing data included in the Web-based Needs Assessment described in Chapter 1, it is clear that the region has extensive maintenance and modernization requirements, including the need to address safety and mobility for all modes. MPO staff estimates that these needs likely would exceed the region’s anticipated financial resources between now and 2040. Therefore, the MPO must prioritize the region’s needs in order to guide investment decisions. This chapter provides an overview of the MPO region’s transportation needs for the next twenty-five years. The information in this chapter has been organized according to the LRTP’s goals—which are used to evaluate projects in the Universe of Projects List both for scenario planning, and then project selection for the recommended LRTP. The LRTP’s goals are related to: • Safety • System Preservation • Capacity Management and Mobility • Clean Air and Clean Communities • Transportation Equity • Economic Vitality Information in each goal-based section of this chapter falls into these general categories: • The goals and related objectives • Background information for each goal • The policy context that surrounds each goal, which includes: 1. Initiatives and directives that shape the goal and related needs. Detailed information about each of the policies is included in Appendix A. 2. Relevant studies, reports, and documents that help the MPO understand the region’s transportation needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Alewife/Mystic River Advocates and Friends of the Mystic River. 1997. Comprehensive Report of the Lower Mystic River Watershed: Shoreline Survey Results and Analysis for Mystic River, Alewife Brook, and Malden River. Alewife/Mystic River Advocates. 1998. Stormwater Monitoring Program: Water Quality Monitoring September 1997 – September 1998 (Draft). With City of Somerville and Massachusetts Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Environmental Law Enforcement, Riverways Program. Alewife/Mystic River Advocates. 2001. Stormwater Monitoring Program: Water Quality Monitoring Data November 1999 – November 2000. With City of Somerville and Massachusetts Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Environmental Law Enforcement, Riverways Program. Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1998. Post-removal Conditions: Buffer Zone Areas of Debris and Soil Removal (Figure 1). Prepared by Schofi eld Brothers, Inc. Town of Arlington. 1999. Alewife Brook outfalls. Town of Arlington. 2001. Spy Pond watershed restoration project. Grant application to MA Department of Environmental Management, Lake and Pond Watershed Demonstration, Restoration and Protection Program. Bates, R.L. and J.A. Jackson (eds.). 1987. Glossary of Geology. American Geological Institute, Alexandria, VA. Belding, D.L. 1921. A Report upon the Alewife Fisheries of Massachusetts. MA Department of Conservation, Division of Fisheries and Game. Brown, D.W. 2002. Alewife Reservation Mammal Tracking Survey. Prepared for Friends of the Alewife Reservation. Brown, D.W. 2002. Alewife Reservation Migrant and Breeding Bird Survey. Prepared for Friends of the Alewife Reservation. ALEWIFE MASTER PLAN 75 Burtner, J., H. Clish, N. Kimball, and J. Nordgren. 1997. Fish in the City: Challenges Facing the Mystic River Herring Run. Tufts University UEP 255 fi eld project. Prepared for Alewife/Mystic River Advocates.
    [Show full text]
  • Neponset River Watershed Protecting Our Water, Wildlife and Land
    !"a$ QÈQÈ Neponset River Watershed Boston Protecting Our Water, Wildlife and Land There’s a lot going on in your watershed! QÂ • Fourteen cities & towns • Over 120 square miles QÂ Dorchester • 330,00+ people Visit us to learn more: QÂQÂ !"d$ ive !"d$ ponset River www.neponset.org Mattapan Neponset r Quincy QÈ ty k quity Bk Unqu e B n e e U Hyde Park re T r T Q} e !"c$ Qæ e n i !"c$ n Q¼ i P QÅ P Milton M o otther Dedham r ver QÒ Riive QÒ t R QÈ Westwood et QÑ s e M n s M o n Dover i p o ill e p l e l N PPl N laan Iq nti Iq tinng gfi P fie P eld u !"c$ l ur !"c$ d B rg Bk ga k at Qi to Medfield Qi or k ry o k y B o o B r k o y r k y B n Ponkapoag l B n Ponkapoag a l l P a Pond i l Pe Pond i m Norwood ec m cu M r un Qã M r e nit Randolph e i !"d$ t B onkapoag Bk Qæ G !"d$ Bk Ponkapoag Bk G P Q¸ k QÑ QÛ QÑ H Canton H Willett a Willett a PondPond ww ees s Reservoir MM Ip Pond ini k ne B e t QÆ B i t QÆ B E i QÉ r e E u ro l e u oo l a q o r h o a e q k t ive o s e k set R Traph st P QÅ Qz ponnse Trap t P QÅ NNeepo QÒ Qi er Meadow QÒ eaver Mea w B Walpole Be k QÏ S Sppr rin ing g k B B g B Iq k ag Qz k poa S sap Ste QÑ ass ee QÑ a p QÆ M H il Qp lll S B Qã Q} Sc k k chho Bk oo r B ol er lM v e Stoughton r M a v QÉ e r e e a ea e v e a B i v d B Sharon i d R o o R w t w QÆ e t B e s B s n k n k o o p p e !"d$ e !"d$ N Lake N Massapoag Legend Foxborough Canoe Launches NeponsetNeponset Reservoir QÅ Reservoir QÅ Ponds/Ocean Qz Streams Q¸Q¸ Parks/Conservation QÇ Towns Qæ 0 0.5 1 2 QÉ Miles IpIp QÆ QÒ QÑ %&l( Qv Qf Qz Q¸ A watershed is the area of land that drains The Watershed includes parts of 14 cities successful campaign to clean up and into a particular river, stream, or pond.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Metropolitan District Commission
    Public Document No. 48 W$t Commontoealtfj of iWa&sacfmsfetta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Metropolitan District Commission For the Year 1935 Publication or this Document Approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance lm-5-36. No. 7789 CONTENTS PAGE I. Organization and Administration . Commission, Officers and Employees . II. General Financial Statement .... III. Parks Division—Construction Wellington Bridge Nonantum Road Chickatawbut Road Havey Beach and Bathhouse Garage Nahant Beach Playground .... Reconstruction of Parkways and Boulevards Bridge Repairs Ice Breaking in Charles River Lower Basin Traffic Control Signals IV. Maintenance of Parks and Reservations Revere Beach Division .... Middlesex Fells Division Charles River Lower Basin Division . Bunker Hill Monument .... Charles River Upper Division Riverside Recreation Grounds . Blue Hills Division Nantasket Beach Reservation Miscellaneous Bath Houses Band Concerts Civilian Conservation Corps Federal Emergency Relief Activities . Public Works Administration Cooperation with the Municipalities . Snow Removal V. Special Investigations VI. Police Department VII. Metropolitan Water District and Works Construction Northern High Service Pipe Lines . Reinforcement of Low Service Pipe Lines Improvements for Belmont, Watertown and Arlington Maintenance Precipitation and Yield of Watersheds Storage Reservoirs .... Wachusett Reservoir . Sudbury Reservoir Framingham Reservoir, No. 3 Ashland, Hopkinton and Whitehall Reservoirs and South Sud- bury Pipe Lines and Pumping Station Framingham Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 and Farm Pond Lake Cochituate . Aqueducts Protection of the Water Supply Clinton Sewage Disposal Works Forestry Hydroelectric Service Wachusett Station . Sudbury Station Distribution Pumping Station Distribution Reservoirs . Distribution Pipe Lines . T) 11 P.D. 48 PAGE Consumption of Water . 30 Water from Metropolitan Water Works Sources used Outside of the Metropolitan Water District VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Sandwich Open Space and Recreation Plan
    Town of Sandwich Open Space and Recreation Plan Sandwich Planning and Development Department November, 2018 Open Space & Recreation Plan 2018 Table of Contents Section 1 – Plan Summary ......................................................................................................................... 5 Section 2 – Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 6 Statement of Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Planning Process and Public Participation............................................................................................................. 7 Section 3 – Community Setting ................................................................................................................. 8 Regional Context...................................................................................................................................................... 8 History of the Community ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Population Characteristics .................................................................................................................................... 10 Past, Present and Future Population........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Report | Dept. of Conservation and Recreation, MA
    Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Municipality/Organization: Department of Conservation and Recreation EPA NPDES Permit Number: MAR043001 MaDEP Transmittal Number: Annual Report Number & Reporting Period: No. 6: May 08-April 09 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES PII Small MS4 General Permit Annual Report Part I. General Information Contact Person: Robert Lowell Title: Storm Water Manager Telephone #: (617) 626-1340 Email: [email protected] Certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Signature: Printed Name: Richard K. Sullivan Title: Commissioner Date: 9/7/2010 Page 1 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 6 Annual Report Part II. Self-Assessment The Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) has completed the required self-assessment and has determined that we are in compliance with all permit conditions, except as noted in the following tables. DCR received authorization to discharge under the general permit from EPA on November 8, 2007 and from DEP on November 21, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Pathway Design Modifications Could Greatly Improve Safety for All Visitors
    CONTENTS 03 Project Details 07 Exhibit A | Park Map 08 Exhibit B | Link to Relevant Documents 09 Exhibit C | Strategic Plan 02 Level 1 Multimodal Pathway Design Improvements for the Charles River Esplanade in Boston, MA SUMMARY The Esplanade Association (EA), in partnership with the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), seeks professional services including planning, design, permitting, and construction management for multimodal pathway design modifications within the Charles River Esplanade park. The consultant will work in collaboration with representatives from EA and DCR to develop site-specific solutions to improve pathway safety for all users in this dynamic urban green space. EA is embarking on what is expected to be a series of multi-year, multi-level projects to improve the Esplanade pathway system, beginning with Immediate Impact improvements such as signage and pavement markings, building up to Major Impact improvements such as pathway design changes, and culminating with Multigenerational Impact projects that will see the expansion of the Esplanade’s multimodal pathway network. This RFP is designated for the Level 1 Immediate Impacts Project with the goal of improving pathway safety at priority locations on the Esplanade. Proposals from qualified applicants are requested by Thursday, May 20, 2021. Qualified Level 1 applicants may be eligible to receive the RFPs designated for the Level 2 Major Impact Projects and/or the Level 3 Multigenerational Impact Projects, when they become available. ORGANIZATIONAL BACKGROUND The Esplanade Association is a 100% privately funded nonprofit organization that works to revitalize and enhance the Charles River Esplanade, sustain its natural green space, and build community by providing educational, cultural, and recreational programs for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Outreach for Destination 2040
    appendix D Public Outreach for Destination 2040 INTRODUCTION Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff conducted outreach activities throughout the development of the Destination 2040 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Outreach began in October 2017 with the development of the Needs Assessment and continued through the 30-day public comment period for the draft LRTP in July and August 2019. This appendix summarizes the outreach activities and public input received during the different phases of LRTP development: Needs Assessment, vision, goals and objectives revisions, and project and program selection. It concludes with the comments received during the formal 30-day public comment period for the draft LRTP. The MPO engaged a wide variety of individuals in the development of Destination 2040, including: • Regional Transportation Advisory Council (Advisory Council) • Municipalities • Transportation agencies, including the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), and regional transit authorities • Professional groups (for example, planners, and engineers, etc.) • Community organizations • Transportation equity groups • Economic development and business organizations • Transportation and environmental advocates MPO staff used a variety of communication and engagement methods to engage the public and solicit feedback from the community: • In-person meetings with the Advisory Council, the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) subregional groups, stakeholder
    [Show full text]