Esplanade Cultural Landscape Report - Introduction 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
STATISTICAL REPORTS Commissioner of Correction
Public Document No. 115 Styr Olommonutfaltlf of fflasBarljuarîta STATISTICAL REPORTS OF THE Commissioner of Correction For The Y ear Ending December 31, 1967 P ublication of t h is D ocu m ent A pproved by A lfred C. H olland. State P urchasing A gent. 900-6 -69-949774 $.667 (Eommomuraltlj of HJaBHarljuBpttH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION 100 C ambridge Str eet, Boston, Mass. 02202 STATISTICAL REPORT OF THF COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION FOR, THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1967 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION JOHN A. GAVIN Commissioner Robert J. Moore, Deputy Commissioner for Institutional Services John J. Fitzpatrick, Deputy Commissioner for Classification and Treatment John A. Chmielinski, Deputy Commissioner for Personnel and Training Parole Board Joseph F. McCormack, Chairman Cornelius J. Twomey, Member John T. Lane, Member Mary P. Kirkpatrick, Member Tillie A. Z elesky, Member (Before June, 1967) L. Warren DeSaulnier, Member (Since June, 1967) 115 M /VC. P.D. 115 1 STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS INSTITUTION LOCATION Mass. Corr. Inst. Walpole........ South Walpole. Palmer Scafati, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Norfolk......... Norfolk........ Philip J. Picard, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Concord........ West Concord . James L. O'Shea, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Framingham . Framingham . Betty Cole Smith, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Bridgewater. South Bridgewater Charles W. Gaughan, Superintendent Mass. Corr. Inst. Plymouth . South Carver . James F. Mahoney, Jr. Mass. Corr. Inst. Monroe ......... Monroe ........ Director of Prison Camps Mass. Corr. Inst. Warwick........ Warwick........ 100 Cambridge Street, Boston, Mass. COUNTY JAILS AND HOUSES OF CORRECTION NOTE: Places marked with * are Jails only; those marked with a # are Houses of Correction only. COUNTY LOCATION Barnstable Barnstable................ -
Conceptual Plan
About the Cover Photo The photo on the cover of this report was taken on December 17, 2010, around 8:00 AM. The view is from the Savin Hill Avenue overpass and looks almost directly south. This overpass is shown in Figure 3-3 of the report, and the field of view includes land shown in Figure 3-2. At the right is the recently completed headhouse of the Savin Hill Red Line station. Stopped at the station platform is an inbound Red Line train that started at Ashmont and will travel to Alewife. The station is fully ADA-compliant, and the plan presented in this report requires no modification to this station. Next to the Red Line train is an inbound train from one of the three Old Colony commuter rail branches. There is only one track at this location, as is the case throughout most of the Old Colony system. This train has a mixed consist of single-level and bi-level coaches, and is being pushed by a diesel locomotive, which is mostly hidden from view by the bi-level coaches. Between the two trains is an underpass beneath the Ashmont branch of the Red Line. This had been a freight spur serving an industrial area on the west side of the Ashmont branch tracks. Sections A-2.3 and A-2.4 of this report present an approach to staging railroad reconstruction that utilizes the abandoned freight spur and underpass. The two tracks to the left of the Old Colony tracks serve the Braintree Red Line branch. -
Boston University Charles River Campus August 10, 2012 2012–2022 Institutional Master Plan
Boston University Charles River Campus August 10, 2012 2012–2022 Institutional Master Plan Submitted by Trustees of Boston University Submitted to Boston Redevelopment Authority Prepared by Fort Point Associates, Inc. in association with: CBT Architects Greenberg Consultants, Inc. Tetra Tech TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 CAMPUS HISTORY AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................... 1-1 1.2 UNIVERSITY VALUES, MISSION, AND GOALS ............................................................. 1-3 1.3 2012–2022 INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN ................................................................. 1-4 1.3.1 PROGRESS SINCE THE LAST INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN .......................... 1-5 1.4 MASTER PLANNING PROCESS ...................................................................................... 1-8 1.4.1 BOSTON UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY TASK FORCE .......................................... 1-8 1.4.2 INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN PROJECT TEAM .............................................. 1-9 CHAPTER 2: CAMPUS DEMOGRAPHICS 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 STUDENT POPULATION ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT TRENDS ................................................................ 2-1 2.2.2 CURRENT POPULATION .................................................................................. -
City Maintained Street Inventory
City Maintained Streets Inventory DATE APPROX. AVG. STREET NAME ACCEPTED BEGINNING AT ENDING AT LENGTH WIDTH ACADEMYText0: ST Text6: HENDERSONVLText8: RD BROOKSHIREText10: ST T0.13 Tex20 ACADEMYText0: ST EXT Text6: FERNText8: ST MARIETTAText10: ST T0.06 Tex17 ACTONText0: WOODS RD Text6:9/1/1994 ACTONText8: CIRCLE DEADText10: END T0.24 Tex19 ADAMSText0: HILL RD Text6: BINGHAMText8: RD LOUISANAText10: AVE T0.17 Tex18 ADAMSText0: ST Text6: BARTLETText8: ST CHOCTAWText10: ST T0.16 Tex27 ADAMSWOODText0: RD Text6: CARIBOUText8: RD ENDText10: OF PAVEMENT T0.16 Tex26 AIKENText0: ALLEY Text6: TACOMAText8: CIR WESTOVERText10: ALLEY T0.05 Tex12 ALABAMAText0: AVE Text6: HANOVERText8: ST SWANNANOAText10: AVE T0.33 Tex24 ALBEMARLEText0: PL Text6: BAIRDText8: ST ENDText10: MAINT T0.09 Tex18 ALBEMARLEText0: RD Text6: BAIRDText8: ST ORCHARDText10: RD T0.2 Tex20 ALCLAREText0: CT Text6: ENDText8: C&G ENDText10: PVMT T0.06 Tex22 ALCLAREText0: DR Text6: CHANGEText8: IN WIDTH ENDText10: C&G T0.17 Tex18 ALCLAREText0: DR Text6: SAREVAText8: AVE CHANGEText10: IN WIDTH T0.18 Tex26 ALEXANDERText0: DR Text6: ARDIMONText8: PK WINDSWEPTText10: DR T0.37 Tex24 ALEXANDERText0: DR Text6: MARTINText8: LUTHER KING WEAVERText10: ST T0.02 Tex33 ALEXANDERText0: DR Text6: CURVEText8: ST ARDMIONText10: PK T0.42 Tex24 ALLENText0: AVE 0Text6:/18/1988 U.S.Text8: 25 ENDText10: PAV'T T0.23 Tex19 ALLENText0: ST Text6: STATEText8: ST HAYWOODText10: RD T0.19 Tex23 ALLESARNText0: RD Text6: ELKWOODText8: AVE ENDText10: PVMT T0.11 Tex22 ALLIANCEText0: CT 4Text6:/14/2009 RIDGEFIELDText8: -
Annual Report of the Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council Presented By
Annual Report of the Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council presented by Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council Patricia Leavenworth, P.E., Chair November 2017 Annual Report of the Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council Executive Summary MassDOT’s progress in implementing asset management is keeping Massachusetts apace with Federal requirements. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) have implemented final transportation asset management (TAM) rules in 2017 that impact how MassDOT measures and communicates the condition of its assets. Transportation Asset Management Plans FHWA and FTA rules require the Highway Division, the MBTA, the Rail and Transit Division, and each RTA to complete a transportation asset management plan (TAMP for Highway, TAM Plan for transit). The status on these plans is as follows: Highway | Will be submitted to FHWA in April, 2018. MBTA | Will be submitted to FTA by October, 2018. Rail | A consultant has been retained for delivery of an asset management plan for rail by February, 2018. This plan is not required by any Federal rule, but MassDOT is pursuing it to improve asset management at the agency. Transit | MassDOT is making progress toward submitting the TAM Plan for MassDOT’s in-house transit assets and those of its Federal Aid sub-recipients to FTA by October, 2018. RTAs | Each RTA is at a different stage in the development of their asset management plans, due to the FTA by October, 2018. MassDOT is ready to assist if asked. Performance and Condition Key performance and asset management findings of this report are summarized below by asset type and division. -
Pavements and Surface Materials
N O N P O I N T E D U C A T I O N F O R M U N I C I P A L O F F I C I A L S TECHNICAL PAPER NUMBER 8 Pavements and Surface Materials By Jim Gibbons, UConn Extension Land Use Educator, 1999 Introduction Traffic Class Type of Road Pavements are composite materials that bear the weight of 1 Parking Lots, Driveways, Rural pedestrian and vehicular loads. Pavement thickness, width and Roads type should vary based on the intended function of the paved area. 2 Residential Streets 3 Collector Roads Pavement Thickness 4 Arterial roads 5 Freeways, Expressways, Interstates Pavement thickness is determined by four factors: environment, traffic, base characteristics and the pavement material used. Based on the above classes, pavement thickness ranges from 3" for a Class 1 parking lot, to 10" or more for Class 5 freeways. Environmental factors such as moisture and temperature significantly affect pavement. For example, as soil moisture Sub grade strength has the greatest effect in determining increases the load bearing capacity of the soil decreases and the pavement thickness. As a general rule, weaker sub grades require soil can heave and swell. Temperature also effects the load thicker asphalt layers to adequately bear different loads associated bearing capacity of pavements. When the moisture in pavement with different uses. The bearing capacity and permeability of the freezes and thaws, it creates stress leading to pavement heaving. sub grade influences total pavement thickness. There are actually The detrimental effects of moisture can be reduced or eliminated two or three separate layers or courses below the paved wearing by: keeping it from entering the pavement base, removing it before surface including: the sub grade, sub base and base. -
Brick Streets Plan
BRICK STREETS PLAN City of Rock Island Community & Economic Development Department Planning & Redevelopment Division Rock Island Preservation Commission Adopted 1988 by Rock Island City Council Amended: January 23, 2012 August 22, 2011 March 28, 2005 April 10, 2000 May 12, 1997 September 14, 1992 Rock Solid. Rock Island. 1899 - The first brick pavement was laid in the Tri-Cities on the corner of Twentieth Street and Second Avenue, Rock Island. The first brick was placed by Mayor William McConochie. Civil Engineer for the project was H.G. Paddock. -- From Historical Souvenir of Moline and Vicinity, 1909 TABLE of CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................... 3 Prioritization List ........................................................................................... 5 Map of Brick Streets ..................................................................................... 6 Methodology ................................................................................................ 9 History of Brick Street Construction in Rock Island ...................................... 10 Condition of Brick Streets ............................................................................. 13 Utilities and Brick Streets ............................................................................. 17 Street Standards .......................................................................................... 18 Owner-Occupancy Along Brick Streets ....................................................... -
Draft Summary of Public Comments Draft Ffys 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Draft Summary of Public Comments Draft FFYs 2018-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) SUPPORT OPPOSE Page PROJECT(S) /ISSUE(S) COMMENTER(S) COMMENT (SUMMARIZED) Draft Response REQUEST in PDF Regional Transportation Advisory Council Organization: RTAC Thanks the MPO staff for its attention to reframing and improving communication, information, and material related Thank you for your comment. to the TIP. States this information has been helpful in explaining the TIP processes to stakeholders and the public. TIP Outreach Support 1 Organization: RTAC Expresses appreciation for the MPO's attention to newly established priorities and the "binning" approach by which Thank you for your comment. projects are compared to other projects of the same type in the TIP scoring. The Community Transportation/Parking/Clean Air and Mobility investment program will be defined by the MPO and MPO staff during Requests the MPO begin to consider criteria related to the sustainability of projects in the Community FFY 2018. Project Scoring & Transportation category. Notes a study has been identified to do this in the FFY 2018 UPWP. Request 1 Evaluation MPO Staff will work with MassDOT to ensure that projects listed in the Universe of Projects are active and remain priorities of the States there are several projects on the TIP programming scenario list that were given initial approval as much as municipal project proponents. If considered necessary, projects will be reevaluated and rescored during TIP development. 15 or 20 years ago. Notes there have been many examples of changes in both regional and local priorities since that time. Requests that the MPO reconfirm that those projects are still priorities with the project sponsors, and to re-score the projects on a regular basis. -
Computer-Aided Construction Planning for Boston's Central Artery Project
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1282 57 Computer-Aided Construction Planning for Boston's Central Artery Project BRIAN R. BRENNER Some new computer applications are being developed for and Roule IA applied to the construction planning and traffic studies associated with the design of the Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel in Boston. This project is one of the most massive and complex urban highway projects in the country. It features an immersed tube harbor tunnel, depression of the downtown expressway in a cut-and-cover tunnel without interrupting service on the existing overhead viaduct, major new or revised urban interchanges, and long-span river crossings. The construction site, with its old exist ing and historic buildings and subways, permits limited clear ances, posing formidable challenges to engineers planning the work. The computer applications described include computerized composite mapping for archeological planning; analysis of mul tilevel curved-girder viaducts; transportation forecasting using highway network models; planning associated with the construc tion of the depressed Central Artery tunnels; and computer-aided 1-90 planning and mitigation measures for underpinning, protection of a subway tube, and other construction problems. The Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel (CA/THT) SOUTH BOSTON project is a massive urban highway improvement job being planned and designed in Boston. A key map is shown in Figure 1. The work features the addition of a third harbor tunnel, a •••• • • • • Artery/Tunnel Project new immersed tube tunnel that will cross Boston Harbor and extend I-90 to Logan Airport and Route lA. The six-lane FIGURE 1 Key map, CA/THT project. -
Annual Report of the Trustees of The
Public Document No. 24 FIFTY-NINTH ANNUAL EEPOET THE TRUSTEES The State Farm BRIDGEWATER, INCLUDING THE REPORTS OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AND OF THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR, Yeab e:ndixg November 30, 1912. BOSTON: WEIGHT & POTTEE FEINTING CO., STATE PEINTEES, 18 Post Office Square. 1913. Approved by The State Board of Publication. CONTENTS. PAGE Trustees' Report, 7 Superintendent's Report, 11 Treasurer's Report, 14 Statistics, 20 Valuation, 26 Hospital Report (Prison and Almshouse), 27 Hospital Statistics (Prison and Almshouse), . .31 Hospital Report (Insane), 39 Hospital Statistics (Insane), 47 STATE FARM, BRIDGEWATER. TRUSTEES. JOHN B. TIVNAN, Chairman, Salem. PAYSON W. LYMAN, Secretary, Fall River. LEONARD HUNTRESS, M.D., Lowell. Mrs. HELEN R. SMITH, Newton. GALEN L. STONE, Brookline. JOHN W. COUGHLIN, M.D., Fall River. Mrs. NELLIE E. TALBOT, . Brookline. RESIDENT OFFICERS. HOLLIS M. BLACKSTONE, . Superintendent. HENRY J. STRANN, . Assistant Superintendent and Treasurer. J. ARTHUR TAYLOR, . Master. WALTER E. TEMPLE, . Deputy Master. ERNEST B. EMERSON, M.D., Resident Physician. BENJAMIN B. KASSON, M.D., Assistant Physician. MINOT W. GALE, M.D., Assistant Physician. ERNEST E. BACON, Farmer. WILLIAM J. TURNBULL, . Engineer. CONSULTING PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS TO THE HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT. CALVIN PRATT, M.D., Bridgewater. SAMUEL J. MIXTER, M.D., Boston. HENRY EHRLICH, M.D., Boston. WILLIAM F. KNOWLES, M.D., Boston. DANIEL FISKE JONES, M.D., Boston. ®l)e Commnntuealtl] of illa^sadjusettB. TRUSTEES' REPORT. To His Excellency the Governor and the Honorable Council. Obedient to statutory requirement, the trustees of the State Infirmary and the State Farm submit their fifty-ninth annual report as to the operation of the State Farm for the year ending Nov. -
Memorial Drive Greenway Improvements, Phase III Public Comments Received by DCR Deadline May 9, 2019
Memorial Drive Greenway Improvements, Phase III Public Comments received by DCR deadline May 9, 2019 Time Comment Name Email Adress Address City State Zip 4/9/19 11:51 AM re: Memorial Drive Greenway Improvements, Phase III -- yurij lojko [email protected] 18 lawrence st medford MA 02155 there are lots of stretches of this greenway that become dicey on a bike. without a mountain bike, it's not likely to be a comfortable or safe experience biking from the museum of science to brighton, for example, on the greenway. some of the newer stretches around MIT are great, but the rest are kind of all over the place. making it all more obvious where bikes/peds should each go while repaving neglected stretches would go a long way in making something good even better! thanks, yurij 4/11/19 12:19 PM 1. We need more water fountains along the path all the way up to Suzanne Blier [email protected] 5 Fuller Pl. Cambridge MA 02138 Watertown for runners. There are only 2 (one at the MIT boat house) and one at the Cambridge boat house. 2. The Memorial drive park at Harvard Square (right of the bridge as one faces Allston) should have an exercise area similar to the one near B.U. Two reasons for this: -1) fitness, and 2) it would bring more people here doing active things and this would cut down on people sleeping here and doing graffiti 3. related to greenway improvements: could we add a kind of memorial drive "pole" system that could be run from a switch so that Sundays the poles simply could be raised automatically at 10 AM and lowered at 4PM. -
Central Artery/Tunnel Project: a Precast Bonanza
PART 1 Central Artery/Tunnel Project: A Precast Bonanza by Vijay Chandra, P.E. Anthony 1. Ricci, RE. Senior Vice President Chief Bridge Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Central Artery/Tunnel Project Douglas, Inc. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority New York, New York Boston, Massachusetts This article provides an overview of the monumental efforts of Massachusetts transportation officials, their engineering consultants, and multitudes of construction industry professionals to ease congestion, improve motorist safety, and address issues of environmental quality in the heart of Boston, Massachusetts. The Central Artery/Tunnel Project is the largest highway construction job ever undertaken in the United States, involving many diverse types of precast concrete construction. maj or transportation infrastructure undertaking, • Standardized temporary structures utilizing precast con billed as “The Big Dig,” is transforming traffic op crete elements. A erations in and around Boston, Massachusetts. This • Precast segmental box girders integrated into cast-in-place $13.2 billion project, the biggest and most complex trans columns to provide seismically resistant connections. portation system ever undertaken in the United States, is • Precast segmental boxes cut at a skew to connect them on significant not only in this country, but worldwide. Nu either side of straddle bents. merous innovative construction techniques are being used, The project has brought out the best that precast con including: crete technology has to offer — in many cases utilizing • Precast tunnels jacked under railroad embankments. cutting edge techniques — and has been of immeasurable • Deep soil mixing to stabilize land reclaimed from the value to New England’s precasting industry. Precasters, ocean. faced with many complex and daunting challenges, are • Precast concrete immersed tube tunnels.