DOCSLIB.ORG

Submission to the Parliamentary Inquiry Into Environmental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Submission to the Parliamentary Inquiry Into Environmental DELWP Submission: Parliamentary Inquiry into Environmental InfrastructureSubmission for Growing Populations to the Parliamentary Inquiry into Environmental Infrastructure for Growing Populations DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, LAND, WATER AND PLANNING OCTOBER 2020 1 DELWP Submission: Parliamentary Inquiry into Environmental Infrastructure for Growing Populations Acknowledgment We acknowledge and respect Victorian Traditional Owners as the original custodians of Victoria's land and waters, their unique ability to care for Country and deep spiritual connection to it. We honour Elders past and present whose knowledge and wisdom has ensured the continuation of culture and traditional practices. We are committed to genuinely partner, and meaningfully engage, with Victoria's Traditional Owners and Aboriginal communities to support the protection of Country, the maintenance of spiritual and cultural practices and their broader aspirations in the 21st century and beyond. © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Printed by <Insert Name of printer - Suburb> ISBN XXX-X-XXXXX-XXX-X (print) How to obtain an ISBN or an ISSN ISBN XXX-X-XXXXX-XXX-X (pdf) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au. 2 DELWP Submission: Parliamentary Inquiry into Environmental Infrastructure for Growing Populations Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Partnering with Traditional Owners ................................................................................................. 11 Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................................................. 11 DELWP’s Strategic Framework for Environmental Infrastructure .................................................... 12 Section 1. The Benefits of Accessing and Using Different Types of Environmental Infrastructure ...... 14 1.1 Economic, Social and Environmental Benefits ............................................................................ 15 1.2 Framework for Determining Benefits ......................................................................................... 18 Section 2. Environmental Infrastructure and the Victorian Government’s Response to Population Growth in Melbourne and Regional Centres ........................................................................................ 20 2.1 The Impacts of Population Growth on Environmental Infrastructure ........................................ 20 Waterways .................................................................................................................................... 20 Open Space & Parks ...................................................................................................................... 21 Canopy Trees & Wildlife Corridors ................................................................................................ 22 2.2 DELWP’s Key Programs to Respond to Population Pressure and Preserve and Provide Environmental Infrastructure ........................................................................................................... 23 Waterways .................................................................................................................................... 23 Open Space and Parks ................................................................................................................... 25 Canopy Trees and Wildlife Corridors ............................................................................................ 28 Section 3. Differences in the Availability of Environmental Infrastructure Between Different Suburbs and Between Different Regional Centres ............................................................................................. 31 Waterways .................................................................................................................................... 31 Open Space and Parks ................................................................................................................... 32 Sporting Fields & Recreation Reserves ......................................................................................... 33 Canopy Trees & Wildlife Corridors ................................................................................................ 33 Section 4. The Effectiveness of Current Legislation and Planning Provisions in Securing Environmental Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................ 35 Waterways .................................................................................................................................... 35 Open Space & Parks ...................................................................................................................... 36 Forest and Bushland (Native Vegetation and other forests) ........................................................ 37 Canopy Trees & Wildlife Corridors ................................................................................................ 39 Planning System ............................................................................................................................ 40 Section 5. Existing Delays or Obstacles to Securing Environmental Infrastructure .............................. 43 Waterways .................................................................................................................................... 43 Canopy Trees and Wildlife Corridors ............................................................................................ 43 3 DELWP Submission: Parliamentary Inquiry into Environmental Infrastructure for Growing Populations Section 6. The Impact of coronavirus on the Importance, Use and Design of Environmental Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................ 44 Interactions Between the coronavirus and Critical Megatrends .................................................. 44 Critical Insights into Environmental Infrastructure ....................................................................... 45 Designing for Multiple Outcomes ................................................................................................. 47 Investing in Environmental Infrastructure Where it’s Needed Most ........................................... 48 Section 7. Examples of Best Practice and Innovative Approaches to Securing Environmental Infrastructure in Other Jurisdictions ..................................................................................................... 49 Global approaches ............................................................................................................................ 49 London .......................................................................................................................................... 49 Pittsburgh – a new impact systems approach .............................................................................. 49 Australian city approaches ................................................................................................................ 50 Adelaide ........................................................................................................................................ 50 Sydney ........................................................................................................................................... 50 ACT ................................................................................................................................................ 51 Victorian Case studies ....................................................................................................................... 52 Harkness Cemetery: reimaging a memorial park ......................................................................... 52 Greening the Pipeline ................................................................................................................... 53 Djerring Trail
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Noble Park Major Activity Centre
    Noble Park Major Activity Centre Structure Plan, 2021 The City of Greater Dandenong respectfully acknowledges Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples as the Traditional Custodians of the land. We recognise and respect their continuing connections to climate, culture and Country. Contents Executive summary ...............................................4 1 Introduction .........................................................8 1.1 Purpose of a Structure Plan ..............................9 1.2 Vision for Noble Park .......................................12 1.2.1 Climate Change Mitigation and Planning 12 1.2.2 Key outcomes of the Structure Plan .......12 1.3 Consultation on the Structure Plan ..................13 1.4 Context and history ..........................................13 1.4.1 ‘Village Character’ explanation ...............14 1.5 Noble Park today .............................................15 1.6 Noble Park in the future ...................................15 2 Structure Plan Boundary ..................................16 2.1 Setting the boundary .......................................16 3 Existing Planning Policy Context ...................18 3.1 State Policy Context ........................................18 3.1.1 Plan Melbourne .....................................18 3.2 Local Policy Context .......................................18 3.2.1 Noble Park Activity Centre Structure Plan, 2009 ......................................................18 4 Development demand .......................................19 4.1 Residential
    [Show full text]
  • West Gate Tunnel Project GTA Review
    21 August 2017 Title West Gate Tunnel Project Transport Expert Evidence #1John Kiriakidis – 22 August 2017 GTA Review (GTA Section 1.3) 1. Consider project’s strategic transport alignment with planning policy. 2. A peer review of analytics contained in the Transport Impact Assessment (TIAR) relied on to inform the EES in support of the Project. 3. Adoption of transport modelling forecasts prepared by VLC. #2 1 21 August 2017 GTA Strategic Alignment Methodology 1. Validate the transport challenges identified in the EES (and Business Case) which form the basis of need for the project by identifying their pre-existence in established policies and studies. 2. Review strategic planning policies to determine the extent of alignment with established policy and planning for Greater Melbourne, 3. Examine the EES as it relates to transport by exploring the project’s consistency with objectives set out in the Transport Integration Act (2010). #3 EES Project Scoping Objective EES Scoping Requirement (for Transport): • ‘To increase transport capacity and improve connectivity to and from the west of Melbourne, and, in particular, increase freight movement via the freeway network instead of local and arterial roads, while adequately managing the effects of the project on the broader and local road network, public transport, cycling and pedestrian transport networks’. • Key themes within the Objective: – Transport capacity – Improving connectivity (with emphasis on areas West of Melbourne) – Moving freight via a higher order road system – Adequately managing effects on public transport and active travel #4 2 21 August 2017 High Level Project Plan #5 Legislation / Policy Framework • The Transport Integration Act 2010 came into effect on 1 July 2010 and is Victoria's principal transport statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Maribyrnong STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS STATEMENT SEPTEMBER 2018
    Maribyrnong STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS STATEMENT SEPTEMBER 2018 Integrated Water Management Forums Acknowledgement of Victoria’s Aboriginal communities The Victorian Government proudly acknowledges Victoria's Aboriginal communities and their rich culture and pays its respects to their Elders past and present. The government also recognises the intrinsic connection of Traditional Owners to Country and acknowledges their contribution to the management of land, water and resources. We acknowledge Aboriginal people as Australia’s fi rst peoples and as the Traditional Owners and custodians of the land and water on which we rely. We recognise and value the ongoing contribution of Aboriginal people and communities to Victorian life and how this enriches us. We embrace the spirit of reconciliation, working towards the equality of outcomes and ensuring an equal voice. © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Printed by Finsbury Green, Melbourne ISSN 2209-8216 – Print format ISSN 2209-8224 – Online (pdf/word) format Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without fl aw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment Lancefield Road Precinct Structure Plan 1075 Sunbury, Victoria
    Aboriginal Heritage Impact Assessment Lancefield Road Precinct Structure Plan 1075 Sunbury, Victoria Report Prepared for Metropolitan Planning Authority August 2015 Matt Chamberlain Executive Summary This report presents the results of an Aboriginal heritage impact assessment of a Precinct Structure Plan areas – PSP 1075 – situated at Sunbury, just north of Melbourne. The area is known as the Lancefield Road PSP (1075), covering an area of 1100 hectares on the east and north eastern side of Sunbury. The location of the study area is shown in Map 1. The purpose of the study is to provide findings and advice with regard to the Aboriginal heritage values of the PSP area. As part of this a range of tasks were outlined by Metropolitan Planning Authority, including: • Identifying the location of known Aboriginal sites (within 10 km radius of the PSP) and any natural features in the landscape that remain places of cultural importance today; • Collecting, documenting and reviewing oral histories and Aboriginal cultural values relating to the precinct; • Identifying Areas or landforms which are likely to be of high, medium and low cultural heritage sensitivity; • Identifying locations that are considered to be significantly disturbed as defined by the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006; • Undertaking an archaeological field survey with the Registered Aboriginal Party (RAP) (the Wurundjeri Tribe Land and Compensation Cultural Heritage Council Incorporated) to locate known and anticipated Aboriginal places within the precinct, with particular focus directed
    [Show full text]
  • Wyndham Pedestrian & Cycle Strategy
    dd Wyndham Pedestrian & Cycle Strategy Cyclist Feedback, Identified network expansion requirements and missing links Wyndham City Council has received a great deal of feedback on cycling within the municipality. The identified issues were considered in writing the 2019 Pedestrian and Cycling Strategy. The feedback has been grouped under common categories in the tables below, to keep like comments together. Table-1 Safety and Blackspot feedback Location Type Comment Derrimut Road Crossing Points crossings at Sayers and Leakes Roads – but I believe these are going to be dealt with by VicRoads Cycle lane Cycle lane on the Eastern side is in one direction only. It’s a busy Derrimut Road road so lanes on both sides of the road need to be two way. Also, going under the railway bridge near the Princess Highway Obstacles There are many obstacles within the shared paths – e.g. Derrimut SUP Road, adjacent to Aqualink – a no standing sign (I think) way too close to the middle of the Shared path. Cyclists could easily crash into it; Cnr Derrimut Road and Willmott Cres – many signs Derrimut Road obstructing the path – traffic lights, bike path sign (!!), no standing or something. Not at all safe. Also a shared path sign on cnr of Kookaburra and Derrimut – in middle of path instead of off to the side. Kookaburra Ave Cycle Path Paths on Kookaburra Ave have speed cushions in them. At night Obstacles they are invisible (even with bicycle lights). No need – could have treatment similar to Shaw’s Road. Also path disappears before T intersection with Derrimut Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Activity Surveys During COVID-19 and Comparison with Pre-Lockdown Activity Levels
    More people out on bicycles: Recreational activity surveys during COVID-19 and comparison with pre-lockdown activity levels May 2020 Measuring recreational activity in unprecedented times Lockdown in Victoria On 30 March 2020, the Minister for Health and Medical Research signed an Order for stage 3 lockdown measures to be put in place across Australian states, following a national outbreak of the novel coronavirus. The Order, which in Victoria falls under section 200 of the Public Health and Wellbeing Act (2008)1, 2, places legally enforceable restrictions on all non-essential gatherings, as a means of minimising the spread of the deadly virus. During the stage 3 restrictions, there are only four reasons for Victorian residents to be outside: • purchasing food and essential supplies; • medical, care or compassionate needs; • exercise; and • work and study if they cannot be undertaken remotely2. How has this affected our recreational activities? An arising question is how these restrictions have affected the recreational needs of residents in Victoria and elsewhere. A recent survey by Bicycle Network3 found that, in response to stage 3 restrictions across Australian states: • 73 per cent [of respondents] are planning to use a bicycle to access essential services (shops, healthcare, work and education) in the coming weeks and months; • 84 per cent of healthcare workers said they would ride bicycles more or the same amount; and • Most respondents (39 per cent) said that they will be riding a bicycle outdoors to get their daily exercise. In addition, emerging data suggests an increase in bicycle purchases during lockdown restrictions4. These findings suggest that, given these increased needs for bicycle-related transport, exercise and recreation; Australian roads and shared paths may be exhibiting major deviations from normal bicycle traffic volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space for Everyone Strategy
    OPEN SPACE STRATEGY FOR METROPOLITAN MELBOURNE2021 OPEN SPACE STRATEGY FOR METROPOLITAN MELBOURNE 2021 Open space FOR EVERYONE Contents Minister’s foreword 1 2 Melbourne’s open space 15 4 Actions underway 35 network Executive summary 3 5 Enabling actions 41 A legacy of visionary open 15 1 Introduction 7 space planning 6 Implementation 49 Our city’s open space legacy 7 Toward a resilient, sustainable 18 open space network Abbreviations 51 About public open space 9 References 51 About this strategy 11 3 Strategic framework 27 Developing the strategy 12 Vision 29 Goals 29 Directions 29 Principles 30 The photos in this document were taken prior to March 2020 before physical distancing and masks were required Above Melbourne’s many cycling and walking trails offer commuters and day-trippers alike convenient, scenic routes through the city, courtesy Parks Victoria Front cover Young couples enjoy the leafy surrounds and abundant wildlife of Yarra Bend Park, a large natural bushland in inner Melbourne, courtesy Parks Victoria’ Back cover The Melbourne CBD and the iconic Yarra River, courtesy Parks Victoria Aboriginal acknowledgment We acknowledge and respect Victoria’s Traditional Owners as the original custodians of the state’s land and waters, their unique ability to care for Country and deep spiritual connection to it. We honour Elders past and present, whose knowledge and wisdom has ensured the continuation of culture and traditional practices. We are committed to genuinely partner and meaningfully engage with Victoria’s Traditional Owners and Aboriginal communities to support the protection of Country, the maintenance of spiritual and cultural practices and their broader aspirations in the 21st century and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Wurdi Youang: an Australian Aboriginal Stone Arrangement with Possible Solar Indications
    Rock Art Research 2013 - Volume 30, Number 1, pp. 55-65. R. P. NORRIS et al. 55 KEYWORDS: Cultural astronomy – Aboriginal astronomy – Aboriginal culture – Geoglyph WURDI YOUANG: AN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL STONE ARRANGEMENT WITH POSSIBLE SOLAR INDICATIONS Ray P. Norris, Cilla Norris, Duane W. Hamacher and Reg Abrahams Abstract. Wurdi Youang is an egg-shaped Aboriginal stone arrangement in Victoria, Austra- lia. Here we present a new survey of the site, and show that its major axis is aligned within a few degrees of east-west. We confirm a previous hypothesis that it contains alignments to the position on the horizon of the setting sun at the equinox and the solstices, and show that two independent sets of indicators are aligned in these directions. We show that these alignments are unlikely to have arisen by chance, and instead the builders of this stone arrangement ap- pear to have deliberately aligned the site on astronomically significant positions. 1. Introduction assume any similarities with other Aboriginal cultures, 1.1 Aboriginal astronomy although we refer to them to set context. It is well established that the night sky plays an important role in many Australian Aboriginal cultures 1.2 Stone arrangements (Stanbridge 1861; Mountford 1956; Haynes 1992; Stone arrangements were constructed by several Johnson 1998; Cairns and Harney 2003; Norris and Indigenous cultures across Australia, and include many Norris 2009; Norris and Hamacher 2009, 2011). As different morphologies (e.g. circles, lines, pathways, well as being associated with traditional songs and standing stones and cairns; Enright 1937; Towle 1939; ceremonies, the sky is used to regulate calendars, and Palmer 1977; Lane and Fullager 1980; Frankel 1982; mark the time of year when a particular food source Attenbrow 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Wyndham Cycle Strategy – Cyclist Feedback
    Wyndham Cycle Strategy – Cyclist Feedback We have received a great deal of feedback already on cycling within Wyndham. We have considered these items when writing the strategy so far and will include them in an appendix contained in the final version of the Strategy. The appendix list will inform Wyndham City’s future infrastructure planning and capital works budgets, and any advocacy to State and Federal Governments for cycle infrastructure funding. We have included this list so that all involved in the consultation know what other community members have provided as well as what is being considered as input into the strategy. The responses have been grouped under common categories to keep like comments together. Safety/Blackspots Comments include: If it felt safer to ride - the traffic is extremely scary, sometimes. I prefer to have dedicated bicycle only or shared paths for safety reasons and for a relaxed enjoyable ride. I believe more people will be into cycling in Wyndham Vale if such dedicated bike trials exists. Tarneit Rd – at some points the cycle path is in service roads, and cyclists who are travelling straight ahead inexplicably have to give way to motorists who are turning left. Derrimut Rd – crossings at Sayers and Leakes Roads – but I believe these are going to be dealt with by VicRoads Derrimut Rd – Cycle lane on the Eastern side is in one direction only. It’s a busy road so lanes on both sides of the road need to be two way. Also, going under the railway bridge near Princes Hwy – the shared path is almost unusable and frequently covered in glass.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Cover Sheets
    Submission Cover Sheet North East Link Project EES IAC 808 Request to be heard?: yes Full Name: David Morrison Organisation: Blackburn Village Residents Group Affected property: Attachment 1: EES_Submission_f Attachment 2: NELP0049_DataR Attachment 3: Comments: See Attachments. Submission for Environmental Effects Statement for the North East Link Submission to Planning Panels Victoria. Blackburn Village Residents Group Inc. Prepared by David Morrison. When do we reassess our approach? The case for better Public Transport Options. Melbourne commuter vehicles have less than 1.2 passengers per car, about 75% of Melbournians drive to work. A Melbourne train (6 carriages) carries about 1300 seated passengers, more if those standing are counted. Feeder roads south of eastern freeway are already near or exceeding capacity. NEL business case has Springvale Road (800), Surry Road (1100) and Middleborough Road (1600) vehicles per lane per hour during the am peak. Capacity is reached between 800 and 900 vehicles per hour. Land requirements for duplicated train line is much less than a multi lane freeway to move the same number of people. 14 trains leave Belgrave for the City in the morning peak between 7.30 and 8.30am. 18200 seated passengers and many more if those standing are counted. About 17 lanes of arterial road are required to move the 18200 people in that same hour assuming 1.2 people per car. I train line requires about the same space as one lane of traffic. Melbourne’s population will continue to grow. The NEL will not be the final answer. A stronger emphasis on public and active transport is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Paths
    Shared paths – the issues They [cyclists] go ‘whoosh’ as they go past, and often the “ paths aren’t very wide, so this notion that you have to share has to come with more thought. If there’s not enough room it’s not a good match. If it’s got to be shared it’s got to be wider. Or separation between them.” Quote from focus groups with Victorian seniors (Garrard 2013) Thank You Victoria Walks would like to acknowledge and thank the following organisations who provided source information and feedback on the initial draft of this paper. • CDM Research • Frankston City Council • Wyndham City Council • Malcolm Daff Consulting • City of Yarra • Cardinia City Council Victoria Walks would also like to thank Dr Jan Garrard, VicRoads and officers from the following councils, who provided comment on the draft – Ballarat, Bayside, Boroondara, Brimbank, Dandenong, Latrobe, Macedon Ranges, Manningham, Maroondah, Melton, Moonee Valley, Mornington Peninsula, Nillumbik and Surf Coast. Finally, Victoria Walks would like to thank the Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) for facilitating engagement with councils. Acknowledgement of these organisations should not be implied as endorsement of this paper and its recommendations by any of the organisations named. Shared Paths – the issues. Version 3.1, May 2015 ©Victoria Walks Inc. Registration No. A0052693U Recommended citation Victoria Walks (2015). Shared paths – the issues, Melbourne, Victoria Walks. Shared paths – the issues Outline This paper considers issues around shared walking and cycling paths. It reviews the literature relating to: • The safety of shared paths, including collision risk, the speed of cyclists and potential impact on pedestrians • User perception of shared paths • The circumstances where walking and cycling paths should be segregated or separated • International and local design guidance around shared paths • The practice of converting footpaths to shared paths • Legal liability issues raised by shared paths.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Market Intelligence Residential Market Overview the Grove (Tarneit)
    Local Market Intelligence Residential Market Overview The Grove (Tarneit) Leaders in Property Intelligence. January 2020 charterkc.com.au ADVISORY. RESEARCH. VALUATIONS. PROJECTS. The Melbourne Story Metropolitan Melbourne: Key Considerations INTRODUCTION Education Melbourne continues to emerge as a city of Liveability international significance. It was ranked as 2 Universities in the Top 100 the world’s most liveable city for seven consecutive years between 2011-2017 and Most Liveable Cities Global Universities was ranked second in 2018 and 2019. (University of Melbourne = 32nd (7 Consecutive Times, 2011-2017) There are highly regarded educational and Monash University = 84th) institutions in Melbourne, with two universities ranked in the top 100 global universities. Economic Activity Strong Employment Growth Victoria, the second-largest economy in Australia, recorded strong growth (+3.0% +3.0 % +1.9% growth over FY 18/19) outperforming the +100,000 Jobs wider Australian economy (+1.9% over FY (Victorian Economic (Australian Economic 12 months to November 2019 (Trend) 18/19) Growth 2018-2019) Growth 2018-2019) Melbourne continues to evolve and create opportunities not available elsewhere in Australia. DEMAND CONSIDERATIONS Victoria Population Growth Victoria is the fastest-growing state in Recent Future Population Growth Australia and has recorded the highest 2018 (2016-2051) population growth rate since Q3-2015. The 139,450 New Residents majority of this growth has occurred within +2.2% 1.5% p.a. (86,000 – Overseas Migration, 13,200 - Net Interstate metropolitan Melbourne. Strong population Migration, 40,250 - Natural Increase growth is anticipated to continue into the Australia = + 1.6% p.a. Australia = + 1.6% p.a.
    [Show full text]