Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP) DRAFT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP) DRAFT CENTRALWATER COMMISSION GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Public Disclosure Authorized Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP) DRAFT Public Disclosure Authorized UPDATED ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized June, 2018 Public Disclosure Authorized TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 Implementation Status ....................................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Additional Financing– Scope............................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Purpose of ESMF ............................................................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Implementation Experience of ESMF in DRIP ................................................................................................. 14 1.6 Need and approach to revision of ESMF for Additional Financing .................................................................. 16 1.7 Structure of the Report ....................................................................................................................................... 16 2. LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORYAND POLICY FRAMEWORK .................................................................... 18 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Applicable Policy, Rules and Regulations: Environmental ............................................................................... 18 2.3 Applicable Policy, Rules and Regulations: Social ............................................................................................. 20 2.4 World Bank Safeguard Policies ......................................................................................................................... 25 3. BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PROFILE ............................................................................ 36 3.1 MADHYA PRADESH ...................................................................................................................................... 36 3.1.1 Mohini Pick-Up Weir ................................................................................................................................. 37 3.1.2 Kolar Dam .................................................................................................................................................. 39 3.2 Odisha ................................................................................................................................................................ 40 3.2.1 Hirakud Dam ............................................................................................................................................. 41 3.3 Karnataka ........................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.3.1 Baseline Status- Environment ..................................................................................................................... 43 3.3.2 Baseline Status- Social ............................................................................................................................... 45 3.4 Kerala ................................................................................................................................................................ 45 3.4.1 Baseline Status- Environment ..................................................................................................................... 45 3.4.2 Baseline Status- Social ............................................................................................................................... 47 3.5 Uttarakhand ....................................................................................................................................................... 48 3.5.1 Baseline Status- Environment ..................................................................................................................... 48 3.5.2 Baseline Status- Social ............................................................................................................................... 51 3.6 Damodar Valley Corporation ............................................................................................................................. 51 3.6.1 Baseline Status- Environment ..................................................................................................................... 51 3.6.2 Baseline Status- Social ............................................................................................................................... 54 3.7 Tamil Nadu ........................................................................................................................................................ 54 3.7.1 Baseline Status- Environment ..................................................................................................................... 54 3.7.2 Baseline Status- Social ............................................................................................................................... 57 4. STAKEHOLDERS CONSULTATION .............................................................................................................. 58 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 58 4.2 Objective ............................................................................................................................................................ 58 4.3 Stakeholders....................................................................................................................................................... 59 4.4 Consultation with stakeholders at Sub Project Sites .................................................................................. 60 5. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................................................................... 63 6. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS ............................................................... 67 6.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 67 6.2 Scoping .............................................................................................................................................................. 67 6.2.1 Categorization of Components ................................................................................................................... 69 6.3 Screening ........................................................................................................................................................... 70 6.3.1 Environmental Screening ............................................................................................................................ 70 6.3.2 Social Screening ......................................................................................................................................... 71 7. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK ............................................................. 73 7.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 73 7.2 ESMF – Provision and Processes ...................................................................................................................... 74 7.3 APPLICATION OF ESMF ................................................................................................................................ 78 7.3.1 Planning Stage ............................................................................................................................................ 78 7.3.2 Implementation Stage ................................................................................................................................. 79 1 7.3.3 Post-Implementation Stage ......................................................................................................................... 80 7.4 Monitoring Checklist for Performance Indicators ........................................................................................... 127 8. SAMPLE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .......................................................... 156 8.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 156 8.2 Management Plans ........................................................................................................................................... 156
Recommended publications
  • Integrating 1D-2D Hydrodynamic Model for Sabarmati Upper River Basin with Special Reference to Ahmedabad City Area
    1 INTEGRATING 1D-2D HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL FOR SABARMATI UPPER RIVER BASIN WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AHMEDABAD CITY AREA. Sejal Chandel ˡ, Dr. Suvarna Shah² ˡ PG Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology and Engineering , The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India ²Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology and Engineering ,The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India [email protected] [email protected] Abstract In recent study, Gujarat has become one of the India’s most urbanized state, causing severe flash flooding. The Sabarmati river is one of the major west-flowing rivers in India and biggest river of north Gujarat. Urbanization should meet the population’s need by enlargement of paved areas, which has unusually changed the catchment’s hydrological and hydraulic characteristic. Therefore, the frequency of flash flooding in Sabarmati river has been increased. The Sabarmati river basin experienced eight times devastating flooding condition between 1972 to 2020.Among which July 2017 flooding event breakdown a 112 years old record of 1905. The Dharoi dam and Wasna barrage on Sabarmati river and surrounding district Kheda, Mehsana, Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad received a huge rainfall caused anomalous inflow to tributary which forced the dam authorities to release huge discharge in short duration. The Sabarmati riverfront of Ahmedabad had been going under water for five days due incessant rainfall in the city that leads to swelling of the Sabarmati River in 2017. In order to determine extent of Inundation, Hydrodynamic Model HEC-RAS(5.0.6) with Arc GIS was used. Various scenarios were run to study the impact of simulation on flood inundation(with & without riverfront project).The simulated flood depths have been compared with actual depths obtained at gauging station, which were collected from Government authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do They Add to the Disaster Potential in Uttarakhand?
    South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People Uttarakhand: Existing, under construction and proposed Hydropower Projects: How do they add to the disaster potential in Uttarakhand? As Uttarakhand faced unprecedented flood disaster and as the issue of contribution of hydropower projects in this disaster was debated, one question for which there was no clear answer is, how many hydropower projects are there in various river basins of Uttarakhand? How many of them are operating hydropower projects, how many are under construction and how many more are planned? How projects are large (over 25 MW installed capacity), small (1-25 MW) and mini-mirco (less than 1 MW installed capacity) in various basins at various stages. This document tries to give a picture of the status of various hydropower projects in various sub basins in Uttarakhand, giving a break up of projects at various stages. River Basins in Uttarakhand Entire Uttarakhand is Uttarakhand has 98 operating hydropower part of larger Ganga basin. The Ganga River is a projects (all sizes) with combined capacity trans-boundary river of India and Bangladesh. The close to 3600 MW. However, out of this 2,525 km long river rises in the western Himalayas capacity, about 1800 MW is in central sector in the Indian state of Uttarakhand, and flows south and 503 MW in private sector, making it and east through the Gangetic Plain of North India into Bangladesh, where it empties into the Bay of uncertain how much power from these Bengal. The Ganga begins at the confluence of the projects the state will get.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Evaluation of River Ganga System in Himalayan Region with Reference to Limnological Aspects
    World Applied Sciences Journal 33 (2): 203-212, 2015 ISSN 1818-4952 © IDOSI Publications, 2015 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2015.33.02.72 Monitoring and Evaluation of River Ganga System in Himalayan Region with Reference to Limnological Aspects 12Gagan Matta and Ajendra Kumar 1Department of Zoology and Environmental Science, Gurukula Kangri University, Haridwar, India 2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Gurukula Kangri University, Haridwar, India Abstract: Water is an important asset for every developing country especially the river water which is the prime source for drinking water. The Ganges, one of the largest river system of Indian subcontinent is being severely polluted by mass bathing, sewage treatment plants, factory effluents and various other human activities. In Haridwar River Ganga System comprising of River Ganga and Ganga Canal emerging out from Ganga River, both with great ritual importance among pilgrims and tourists at Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India. Here also Ganga River and Canal are day by day getting polluted due to mass bathing, washing, disposal of sewage, industrial waste and these human activities deteriorating its water quality severely. River water samples collected in all the seasons of the years 2013 and 2014 were analyzed for various water quality characteristics. Data has statistically been analysed indicating positive and negative relation among parameters. The present study revealed that major factors contributing to deterioration of water quality might be continues discharge of industrial discharge, tourism, anthropogenic and spiritual practices. Therefore, to restore the vitality and water quality of river, proper water resource planning programme should be developed. Key words: River Ganga System River Ganga Haridwar Ganga Canal Water Quality Himalayas INTRODUCTION in 1947, India had 22 million ha under irrigation.
    [Show full text]
  • CBIP EXECUTIVE MEMBERS DIRECTORY (As on 1St January 2016)
    CBIP EXECUTIVE MEMBERS DIRECTORY (As on 1st January 2016) Central Board of Irrigation & Power 8 Decades of Service to the Nation Office Bearers of CBIP PRESIDENT Shri Major Singh Chairperson, CEA VICE PRESIDENTS Shri G.S. Jha Shri K.S. Popli Shri Ashok Sethi Chairman, CWC CMD, IREDA ED, Tata Power SECRETARY DIRECTORS Shri V.K. Kanjlia Shri P.P. Wahi Shri A.C. Gupta Shri C.S. Malik CBIP Executive Members Directory ISO : 9001-2008 Central Board of Irrigation & Power Malcha Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi 110 021 January 2016 Central Board of Irrigation & Power Malcha Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi – 110021 Telephone +91-11-2611 5984/2611 6567/2410 1594 Fax: +91-11-2611 6347 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cbip.org (ii) FOREWORD The Central Board of Irrigation and Power a premier institution created by GOI, has been serving the Nation in the disciplines of Water Resources, Power Sector and Renewable Energy Sectors for more than 89 years. CBIP has contributed excellently in the past years in dissemination of technical knowledge to help the Engineers/Professionals to update their knowledge and gain practical know-how. It is also providing linkage to Indian Engineers with their counter parts in other countries for accentuation of their technical knowledge. It is the national Headquarter of 10 international and 2 national organizations related to Power, Water Resources and Renewable Energy Sectors. The Central Board of Irrigation and Power is celebrating CBIP Day on 29th December 2015 so at to recognize the outstanding contribution of the various organizations and professionals in the field of Water Resources, Power and Renewable Energy Sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Note on Live Storage Status of 130 Reservoirs in the Country (With Reference to Reservoir Storage Bulletin of 02.09.2021)
    BRIEF NOTE ON LIVE STORAGE STATUS OF 130 RESERVOIRS IN THE COUNTRY (WITH REFERENCE TO RESERVOIR STORAGE BULLETIN OF 02.09.2021) 1. ALL INDIA STATUS Central Water Commission is monitoring live storage status of 130 reservoirs of the country on weekly basis and is issuing weekly bulletin on every Thursday. Out of these reservoirs, 44 reservoirs have hydropower benefit with installed capacity of more than 60 MW. The total live storage capacity of these 130 reservoirs is 171.958 BCM which is about 66.70% of the live storage capacity of 257.812 BCM which is estimated to have been created in the country. As per reservoir storage bulletin dated 02.09.2021, live storage available in these reservoirs is 111.691 BCM, which is 65% of total live storage capacity of these reservoirs. However, last year the live storage available in these reservoirs for the corresponding period was 140.051 BCM and the average of last 10 years live storage was 119.026 BCM. Thus, the live storage available in 130 reservoirs as per 02.09.2021 Bulletin is 80% of the live storage of corresponding period of last year and 94% of storage of average of last ten years. As per Table-01, the overall storage position is less than the corresponding period of last year in the country as a whole and is also less than the average storage of last ten years during the corresponding period. 2. REGION WISE STORAGE STATUS: a) NORTHERN REGION The northern region includes States of Himachal Pradesh, Punjab and Rajasthan.
    [Show full text]
  • Hirakud RAP.Pdf
    DAM REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL SPILLWAY OF HIRAKUD DAM, IN SAMBALPUR DISTRICT, ODISHA DRAFT RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) Submitted by Department of Water Resources Government of Odisha June, 2018 Construction of Additional Spillway of Hirakud Dam under DRIP CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ i E.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. i E.2 Hirakud Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement ...................................................................... i E.3 Displacement of People ........................................................................................................... i E.4 Impacts ................................................................................................................................... ii E.5 Entitlement ............................................................................................................................. ii E.6 Consultation ........................................................................................................................... iii E.7 Implementation ..................................................................................................................... iv E.8 Monitoring and Evaluation .................................................................................................... iv E.9 Grievance Redressal Mechanism ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ganga River Basin Management Plan Interim Report Anga River Basin
    Ganga River Basin Management Plan Interim Report September 2013 by Consortium of 7 “Indian Institute of Technology”s (IITs) IIT IIT IIT IIT IIT IIT IIT Bombay Delhi Guwahati Kanpur Kharagpur Madras Roorkee In Collaboration with IIT NIH CIFRI NEERI JNU PU NIT-K DU BHU ISI Allahabad WWF Kolkata University India • ii • Preface In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986), the Central Government constituted the National Ganga River Basin Authority (NGRBA) as a planning, financing, monitoring and coordinating authority for strengthening the collective efforts of the Central and State Governments for effective abatement of pollution and conservation of the Ganga river. One of the important functions of the NGRBA is to prepare and implement a Ganga River Basin Management Plan (GRBMP). A Consortium of 7 “Indian Institute of Technology”s (IITs) was given the responsibility of preparing the GRBMP by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), GOI, New Delhi. A Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) was signed between 7 IITs (Bombay, Delhi, Guwahati, Kanpur, Kharagpur, Madras and Roorkee) and MoEF for this purpose on July 6, 2010. This is the Interim “Ganga River Basin Management Plan”. The thrust of this Plan is to relate the diverse environmental degradations occurring in the basin with their causal factors, and thereby frame a roadmap for redeeming National River Ganga Basin’s Environment. The task involved different thematic groups of experts from 7 IITs and other premier organizations identifying different causal factors and assessing their impacts on the basin to synthesize the findings and recommendations in fulfillment of the important missions identified in the Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project Construction of Additional Spillway at Hirakud Dam, in Sambalpur District, Odisha
    DAM REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL SPILLWAY AT HIRAKUD DAM, IN SAMBALPUR DISTRICT, ODISHA Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Submitted By Public Disclosure Authorized Department of Water Resources Government of Odisha January, 2018 Public Disclosure Authorized CONTENTS Sl. No. TOPIC PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E-1 to E-25 E.1 INTRODUCTION E-1 E.2 NEED OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT E-1 E.3 NEED & OBJECTIVE OF EIA STUDY E-2 E.4 SCOPE OF THE STUDY E-2 E.5 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT E-2 E.5.1 SALIENT FEATURES OF PROJECT E-3 E.6 ACTS, POLICY & INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK E-5 E.7 BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS E-10 E.7.1 THE STUDY AREA E-10 E.7.2 SUMMARY OF BASELINE DATA E-10 E.8 STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC CONSULTATION E-13 E.8.1 ISSUE DISCUSSED E-14 E.9 ANTICIPATED IMPACTS ON VARIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL E-18 COMPONENTS E.10 ANALYTICAL FINDINGS FROM IMPACT ASSESSMENT E-23 E.11 MITIGATION MEASURES E-23 E.12 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES E-23 E.13 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN [EMP] E-24 E.13.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN [EMOP] E-24 E.13.2 ENVIRONMENT GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM E-24 E.13.3 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT, TRAINING & CAPACITY E-24 BUILDING E.13.4 BUDGETARY SUPPORT E-25 CHAPTER-1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION C1-1 to C2-19 1.0 INTRODUCTION C1-1 1.1 HIRAKUD DAM ON RIVER MAHANADI C1-1 1.1.1 MAHANADI BASIN IN BRIEF C1-1 1.1.2 SALIENT FEATURES OF HIRAKUD DAM C1-2 1.1.3 DESIGNED MULTIPURPOSE BENEFITS C1-3 1.2 JUSTIFICATION OF THE PRESENT PROPOSAL C1-4 1.2.1 REVIEW OF DESIGN FLOOD C1-4 1.2.2 REVISED HYDROLOGY & ITS CONSEQUENCES C1-4 1.3 NEED OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT C1-5 1.4 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES C1-6 1.4.1 PRE-PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES C1-6 1.4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ALTERNATIVE SCENARIO OF C1-8 IMPLEMENTATION & POST IMPLEMENTATION PHASES Sl.
    [Show full text]
  • A Local Response to Water Scarcity Dug Well Recharging in Saurashtra, Gujarat
    RETHINKING THE MOSAIC RETHINKINGRETHINKING THETHE MOSAICMOSAIC Investigations into Local Water Management Themes from Collaborative Research n Institute of Development Studies, Jaipur n Institute for Social and Environmental Transition, Boulder n Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai n Nepal Water Conservation Foundation, Kathmandu n Vikram Sarabhai Centre for Development Interaction, Ahmedabad Edited by Marcus Moench, Elisabeth Caspari and Ajaya Dixit Contributing Authors Paul Appasamy, Sashikant Chopde, Ajaya Dixit, Dipak Gyawali, S. Janakarajan, M. Dinesh Kumar, R. M. Mathur, Marcus Moench, Anjal Prakash, M. S. Rathore, Velayutham Saravanan and Srinivas Mudrakartha RETHINKING THE MOSAIC Investigations into Local Water Management Themes from Collaborative Research n Institute of Development Studies, Jaipur n Institute for Social and Environmental Transition, Boulder n Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai n Nepal Water Conservation Foundation, Kathmandu n Vikram Sarabhai Centre for Development Interaction, Ahmedabad Edited by Marcus Moench, Elisabeth Caspari and Ajaya Dixit 1999 1 © Copyright, 1999 Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Institute for Social and Environmental Transition (ISET) Madras Institute of Development Studies (MIDS) Nepal Water Conservation Foundation (NWCF) Vikram Sarabhai Centre for Development Interaction (VIKSAT) No part of this publication may be reproduced nor copied in any form without written permission. Supported by International Development Research Centre (IDRC) Ottawa, Canada and The Ford Foundation, New Delhi, India First Edition: 1000 December, 1999. Price Nepal and India Rs 1000 Foreign US$ 30 Other SAARC countries US$ 25. (Postage charges additional) Published by: Nepal Water Conservation Foundation, Kathmandu, and the Institute for Social and Environmental Transition, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A. DESIGN AND TYPESETTING GraphicFORMAT, PO Box 38, Naxal, Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Article
    International Journal of Global Science Research ISSN: 2348-8344 (Online) Vol.3, Issue 6, October 2016, pp. 406-420 Available Online at www.ijgsr.com © Copyright 2014 | ijgsr.com | All Rights Reserved Research Paper Usages of Reservoirs in Gwalior Region Madhya Pradesh India Yogesh Singh* and Rao R. J. Indira Gandhi Academy of Environmental Education, Research and Eco-Planning, Jiwaji University, Gwalior-474011 India School of Studies in Zoology, Jiwaji University, Gwalior-474011 India *Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Received: 05/09/2016 Revised: 12/09/2016 Accepted: 30/09/2016 Abstract : Dams and reservoirs the water been growing controversy about the failure bodies that is very important for us and for of these projects to address environment and whole universe. At present, more than social concerns. These dams extend major 45,000 large dams and an estimated 800,000 contribution in fish culture and drinking small dams regulate the world’s River; some water supply. Dams, large and small, are have been built to supply water including planned, constructed and operated to meet irrigation, control floods, provide for human needs in the generation of energy, navigation, fishing and recreation, and irrigation for agricultural production, flood importantly to generate electricity. The control, supply of drinking water, and reservoirs have played a powerful role in various other purposes. economic development; however, there has Keywords: Irrigation, Reservoirs INTRODUCTION Dams between 10 and 15 meter also fall into Dams, wetlands and aquatic ecosystems are this category if: crest length is over 500 m or the biological machine of the earth. They are spillway discharge over 2000m 3s-1 or the basis for life and the livelihoods of local reservoir capacity is more than one million communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Society of Engineering Geology
    Indian Society of Engineering Geology Indian National Group of International Association of Engineering Geology and the Environment www.isegindia.org List of all Titles of Papers, Abstracts, Speeches, etc. (Published since the Society’s inception in 1965) November 2012 NOIDA Inaugural Edition (All Publications till November 2012) November 2012 For Reprints, write to: [email protected] (Handling Charges may apply) Compiled and Published By: Yogendra Deva Secretary, ISEG With assistance from: Dr Sushant Paikarai, Former Geologist, GSI Mugdha Patwardhan, ICCS Ltd. Ravi Kumar, ICCS Ltd. CONTENTS S.No. Theme Journal of ISEG Proceedings Engineering Special 4th IAEG Geology Publication Congress Page No. 1. Buildings 1 46 - 2. Construction Material 1 46 72 3. Dams 3 46 72 4. Drilling 9 52 73 5. Geophysics 9 52 73 6. Landslide 10 53 73 7. Mapping/ Logging 15 56 74 8. Miscellaneous 16 57 75 9. Powerhouse 28 64 85 10. Seismicity 30 66 85 11. Slopes 31 68 87 12. Speech/ Address 34 68 - 13. Testing 35 69 87 14. Tunnel 37 69 88 15. Underground Space 41 - - 16. Water Resources 42 71 - Notes: 1. Paper Titles under Themes have been arranged by Paper ID. 2. Search for Paper by Project Name, Author, Location, etc. is possible using standard PDF tools (Visit www.isegindia.org for PDF version). Journal of Engineering Geology BUILDINGS S.No.1/ Paper ID.JEGN.1: “Excessive settlement of a building founded on piles on a River bank”. ISEG Jour. Engg. Geol. Vol.1, No.1, Year 1966. Author(s): Brahma, S.P. S.No.2/ Paper ID.JEGN.209: “Geotechnical and ecologial parameters in the selection of buildings sites in hilly region”.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Sample Procurement Plan (Text in italic font is meant for instruction to staff and should be deleted in the final version of the PP) Public Disclosure Authorized (This is only a sample with the minimum content that is required to be included in the PAD. The detailed procurement plan is still mandatory for disclosure on the Bank’s website in accordance with the guidelines. The initial procurement plan will cover the first 18 months of the project and then updated annually or earlier as necessary). I. General 1. Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan [Original: December 2007]: Revision 15 of Updated Procurement Plan, June 2010] 2. Date of General Procurement Notice: Dec 24, 2006 Public Disclosure Authorized 3. Period covered by this procurement plan: The procurement period of project covered from year June 2010 to December 2012 II. Goods and Works and non-consulting services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: [Thresholds for applicable procurement methods (not limited to the list below) will be determined by the Procurement Specialist /Procurement Accredited Staff based on the assessment of the implementing agency’s capacity.] Public Disclosure Authorized Procurement Method Prior Review Comments Threshold US$ 1. ICB and LIB (Goods) Above US$ 500,000 All 2. NCB (Goods) Above US$ 100,000 First contract 3. ICB (Works) Above US$ 15 million All 4. NCB (Works) Above US$ 5 million All 5. (Non-Consultant Services) Below US$ 100,000 First contract [Add other methods if necessary] 2.
    [Show full text]