DOCSLIB.ORG

PLAN AÇIKLAMA RAPORU İzmir-Manisa Planlama Bölgesi 1/100.000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Planı

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PLAN AÇIKLAMA RAPORU İzmir-Manisa Planlama Bölgesi 1/100.000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Planı İzmir-Manisa Planlama Bölgesi 1/100.000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Planı T.C. ÇEVRE VE ŞEHİRCİLİK BAKANLIĞI MEKÂNSAL PLANLAMA GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ İZMİR-MANİSA PLANLAMA BÖLGESİ 1/100.000 ÖLÇEKLİ ÇEVRE DÜZENİ PLANI PLAN AÇIKLAMA RAPORU İzmir-Manisa Planlama Bölgesi 1/100.000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Planı İÇİNDEKİLER 1. GİRİŞ ................................................................................................................................. 1 2. AMAÇ, KAPSAM VE HEDEFLER ............................................................................... 1 2.1. AMAÇ ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.2. KAPSAM ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.3. HEDEFLER .................................................................................................................................................... 2 3. PLANLAMA YAKLAŞIMI ............................................................................................ 2 3.1. GENEL YAKLAŞIM ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1.1. Nüfus Yapısı ve Gelişimi .......................................................................................................................... 2 3.1.2. Planlama Bölgesi Nüfus Tahminleri ......................................................................................................... 3 3.2. MEVCUT KENTSEL YERLEŞİMLER ...................................................................................................... 4 3.2.1. İzmir İli’nde Kentsel Yerleşimler ............................................................................................................. 5 3.2.1.1. İzmir Merkez Kent ............................................................................................................................ 6 3.2.1.2. Merkez Kent Dışındaki Diğer Kentsel Yerleşimler .......................................................................... 7 3.2.1.3. Kentsel Nüfus Projeksiyonları ve Nüfus Kabulleri ........................................................................... 8 3.2.2. Manisa İli’nde Kentsel Yerleşimler ........................................................................................................ 12 3.2.2.1. Manisa Kentsel Nüfus Projeksiyonları ve Nüfus Kabulleri ............................................................ 12 3.3. KIRSAL YERLEŞİMLER .......................................................................................................................... 14 3.4. YERLEŞİM MERKEZLERİ DIŞINDAKİ KENTSEL GELİŞMELER................................................. 15 3.4.1. Bireysel Konut Gelişmeleri .................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.2. Turizm Gelişmeleri ................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4.3. Endüstriyel Gelişmeler ........................................................................................................................... 17 3.5. DİĞER KULLANIM ALANLARI ............................................................................................................. 18 4. PLANLAMA KARARLARI ............................................................................................. 20 4.1. PLAN SEÇENEKLERİ ............................................................................................................................... 20 4.1.1. BİRİNCİ SEÇENEK; “Mevcut gelişme eğilimleri sürecektir.” ............................................................. 21 4.1.2. İKİNCİ SEÇENEK; “Yeni yatırım kararları ile gelişme desteklenecektir.” ........................................... 22 4.1.3. Seçeneklerin Tartışılması ve Değerlendirme .......................................................................................... 24 4.2. YASAL, DOĞAL VE YAPAY EŞİKLER .................................................................................................. 24 4.3. MEVCUT PLAN KARARLARI ................................................................................................................. 25 4.3.1. Çevre Düzeni Planları ............................................................................................................................. 25 4.3.2. Nazım ve Uygulama İmar Planları ......................................................................................................... 26 4.3.2.1. İzmir İl Sınırları İçinde Onaylı Planlar ........................................................................................... 26 4.3.2.2. Manisa İl Sınırları İçinde Onaylı Planlar ........................................................................................ 27 4.3.3. Mevzii İmar Planları ............................................................................................................................... 28 4.3.4. Diğer Planlama Kararları ........................................................................................................................ 28 4.4. GENEL ARAZİ KULLANIM KARARLARI .......................................................................................... 29 4.4.1. Kentsel Yerleşimler ................................................................................................................................ 29 4.4.1.1. Kentsel Yerleşik Alanlar ................................................................................................................. 29 4.4.1.2. Kentsel Gelişme Alanları ................................................................................................................ 29 4.4.1.2.1. İzmir İli’nde Kentsel Gelişme Alanları ................................................................................... 30 4.4.1.2.2. Manisa İli’nde Kentsel Gelişme Alanları ................................................................................ 40 İzmir-Manisa Planlama Bölgesi 1/100.000 Ölçekli Çevre Düzeni Planı 4.4.2. Kırsal Yerleşmeler .................................................................................................................................. 48 4.4.3. Merkezi İş Alanları ................................................................................................................................. 48 4.4.4. Sanayi Alanları ....................................................................................................................................... 48 4.4.4.1. Organize Sanayi Bölgeleri .............................................................................................................. 49 4.4.4.1.1. İzmir İli Organize Sanayi Bölgeleri ........................................................................................ 49 4.4.4.1.2. Manisa İli Organize Sanayi Bölgeleri ..................................................................................... 50 4.4.4.2. Teknoloji Geliştirme Bölgeleri ve Teknoparklar ............................................................................ 51 4.4.4.3. Diğer Sanayi Alanları ve Sanayi-Depolama Alanları ..................................................................... 51 4.4.4.3.1. İzmir İlinde Sanayi Alanları ve Sanayi-Depolama Alanları .................................................... 52 4.4.4.3.2. Manisa İlinde Sanayi Alanları ve Sanayi-Depolama Alanları ................................................. 54 4.4.4.4. Kentsel Servis Alanları ................................................................................................................... 56 4.4.4.5. Cüruf Depolama ve Geri Kazanım Alanı ........................................................................................ 56 4.4.5. Turizm Alanları ...................................................................................................................................... 56 4.4.6. Tercihli Kullanım Alanları...................................................................................................................... 57 4.4.7. Liman, Tersane Alanları ve Liman Geri Sahaları ................................................................................... 57 4.4.8. Askeri Alanlar ve Askeri Yasak Bölgeler ............................................................................................... 58 4.4.9. Tarım Arazileri ....................................................................................................................................... 58 4.4.9.1. Su Ürünleri Üretim Alanları ........................................................................................................... 58 4.4.10. Teknolojik Seracılık Bölgeleri .............................................................................................................. 58 4.4.11. Tarım ve Hayvancılık Geliştirme Alanları............................................................................................ 59 4.4.12. Orman Alanları ..................................................................................................................................... 59 4.4.13. Doğal Karakteri Korunacak Alanlar ..................................................................................................... 59 4.4.13.1. Mera Alanları ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • W W W . D I K I L I T D I O S B . O R G
    www.dikilitdiosb.org.tr Dikili Agricultural Greenhouse Specialized Organized Industrial Zone Supported, Developed, The products are packed, The products are processed, The products are preserved, Agricultural and industrial integration is developed, Sustainable, suitable and high-quality raw materials are provided to increase competitiveness. Dikili Agricultural Greenhouse Specialized Organized Industrial Zone 3 of all the 28 Specialized Organized Industrial Zone Based On Agriculture are Geothermal Sourced Specialized Organized Industrial Zones Based On Agriculture. Geothermal Sourced TDİOSBs are: Denizli/Sarayköy Greenhouse TDİOSB: 718.000 m² Ağrı/Diyadin Greenhouse TDİOSB: 1.297.000 m² In Turkey there are 28 Specialized Organized Industrial İzmir / Dikili Greenhouse TDİOSB: 3.038.894,97 m² Zone Based On Agriculture. İzmir Dikili TDİOSB has the biggest area of Greenhouse TDİOSB with numer 21 registration in Turkey. 3.038.894,97 m² Bergama Organized Industrial Zone Dikili Agricultural Based Specialized Greenhouse Organized Industrial Zone Western Anatolia Free Zone Batı Anadolu Serbest Bölge Kurucu ve İşleticisi A.Ş. Dikili Agricultural Greenhouse Specialized Organized Industrial Zone It is 7 km to the Dikili Port, 25 km to the Çandarlı Port and 110 km to the Alsancak Port. It is 62 km to the Aliağa Train Station and 71 km to the Soma Train Station. The closest airport is about 65 km to the project area which is the Koca Seyit airport and it is open to international flights. The project area is about 135 km to İzmir Adnan Menderes Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • İzmi̇r History
    İZMİR HISTORY Project Design Strategy Report First Edition, İzmir, 2016 1 Prof. Dr. İlhan Tekeli Prepared for publication by: Dr. H. Gökhan Kutlu Merve Çalışkan, Gizem Akyıldız, Dr. Çağlayan Deniz Kaplan, Alkın Korkmaz First Edition: September, 2016 İzmir Metropolitan Municipality Department of Survey and Project Directorate of Historic Environment and Cultural Properties İzmir History Project Centre 500 Copies Printed By: Dinç Ofset ISBN: 978-975-18-0201-9 2 CONTENTS I.INTRODUCTION 4 II.THESPATIALDIFFERENTIATIONOFTHEPOPULATIONANDTHEECONOMICGROWTH INIZMIR 7 WHATKINDOFASPATIALDIFFERENTIATIONTHEECONOMICGROWTHOFIZMIRSHOWS? 8 THEFORMATIONOFTHEIZMIRCENTERBUSINESSDISTRICT(CBD)ANDTHEFORMATIONDYNAMICSOFTHEIZMIRͲ HISTORYAREAINTHECHANGINGPROCESSINTHECOURSEOFTIME 15 IIIDETERMINATIONOFTHEIZMIRHISTORYPROJECTAREAANDSUBAREAS 34 THEFORMATIONOFTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTANDTHELANDUSAGESTATUSESONIT 37 CHANGESTHATWEREEXPERIENCEDDURINGTHEREPUBLICPERIODINTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTAREA ECONOMICALACTIVITIESPROFILE 47 DETERMINATIONOFTHESUBAREASOFTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECT 53 PROCESSOFTHERIFTFORMATIONINTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTAREA 66 INFORMATIONABOUTROMANIZMIRINTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTAREA 68 IV.STRATEGYPROPOSALOFTHEPRESERVATION/DEVELOPMENTOFIZMIRͲHISTORY PROJECTAREA 70 AIMS 71 STRATEGICALORIENTATION 72 STRATEGIESTHATSHALLBEBENEFITEDINDEVELOPINGTHEIZMIRͲHISTORYPROJECTASPERTHESUBJECTS 74 1.URBANARCHAELOGYANDPRESERVATIONSTRATEGYTHATSHALLBEIMPLEMENTEDINTHEPROJECTREGION 75 2.STRATEGYOFBRINGINGSOMEPLACESINTHEPROJECTAREAINBEINGAPLACEWHICHREALIZESAN“EXPERIENCE” BEYONDBEINGALIFEAREA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Urbanization, Pollution and Biodiversity in İzmir
    International Journal of Environmental Trends (IJENT) 2019: 3 (1),31-38 ISSN: 2602-4160 Review Article A review on Urbanization, Pollution and Biodiversity in İzmir 1 2 Ece SÖKMEN YILMAZ* , Semih YILMAZ 1 Molkim Industrial Products, Department of Research & Development, İzmir, Turkey 2 Dokuz Eylül University, Maritime Faculty, Department of Marine Engineering, İzmir, Turkey Received 05 November 2018 Abstract Accepted 14 April 2019 Izmir is a town with rich habitats in biodiversity as urbanization is rapidly increasing. In this study, the studies on ecology of Izmir have been compiled and Keywords İzmir important natural areas are mentioned. Urbanization and pollution have also been Ecology noted. Biodiversity Urbanization The purpose of this study is; the bringing together of scientific data on Pollution urbanization, pollution and ecology of Izmir and the constituting a basis for evaluating the factors that threaten the ecological situation and environmental health which are not taken into consideration in the projects planned or the projects to be carried out. International Journal of Environmental Trends, 3 (1), 31-38. DOI: not now possible _________________________ 1 Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] 31 International Journal of Environmental Trends (IJENT) 2019: 3(1), 31-38 INTRODUCTION Although urbanization is an increase in the number of cities and population, it is a process that changes the attitudes and behaviors and social structure of people emerging with some technological, economic, social and political phenomena. As cities include different ethnic groups, cultures, social strata and occupational groups, the relations at individual and group levels differ in cities. The resulting individualization is the source of intergenerational conflict arising from value differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentsel Dönüşüm Ve Yerel Siyasetin Değişen Dinamikleri
    56 Planlama 2018;28(1):56–75 | doi: 10.14744/planlama.2017.92485 ARAŞTIRMA / ARTICLE Kentsel Dönüşüm ve Yerel Siyasetin Değişen Dinamikleri: 2009 ve 2014 İzmir Yerel Seçim Sonuçları Bağlamında Bir Araştırma Urban Transformation and Changing Dynamics of Local Politics: Analyzing the Results of the 2009 and 2014 Local Elections in Izmir Ali Kemal Çınar, Mehmet Penpecioğlu Dr. Şehir Plancısı-Bağımsız Araştırmacı ÖZ ABSTRACT Türkiye’de kentsel dönüşüm üzerine gerçekleştirilmiş çok sayıda A large number of studies of urban transformation have been con- çalışma bulunmaktadır. Ancak, kentsel dönüşümün yerel siyaset ile ducted in Turkey; however, broader research regarding the relati- ilişkisi daha fazla araştırma yapılması gereken bir çalışma alanıdır. onship between urban transformation and local politics is needed. Bunun için öncelikle kentsel dönüşümü değişen kentsel siyasi coğ- Urban transformation should be evaluated through the changing rafya ile ilişkili biçimde ele almak; dönüşüm alanlarında yerel seçim dynamics of urban political geography and an examination of the sonuçlarının değişimine odaklanmak gerekmektedir. Makale kapsa- changes in local election results in transformation zones. This mında gerçekleştirdiğimiz araştırma, bu yönde atılmış sınırlı bir ilk study argues that the political background of urban transforma- adımdır. Çalışma, kentsel dönüşüm odaklı politikaların yerel siyase- tion has been changing the dynamics of local politics. In order to analyze these dynamics, the influence of the policies of different tin dinamiklerini değiştirmekte olduğu tespitinden yola çıkmaktadır. political parties on urban transformation issues and the effects of Bu değişen dinamikleri araştırmanın ilk adımı, farklı siyasi partilerin implementation on local election results should be investigated. kentsel dönüşüme ilişkin politikalarının ve uygulamalarının yerel Izmir is an appropriate case for this kind of research, as the central seçim sonuçlarına etkisini sorgulamaktır.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dikili-Çandarl› Volcanics, Western Turkey: Magmatic Interactions As Recorded by Petrographic and Geochemical Features
    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences (Turkish J. Earth Sci.), Vol. 16, 2007, pp. 493–522. Copyright ©TÜB‹TAK The Dikili-Çandarl› Volcanics, Western Turkey: Magmatic Interactions as Recorded by Petrographic and Geochemical Features ZEK‹YE KARACIK1, YÜCEL YILMAZ2 & JULIAN A. PEARCE3 1 ‹stanbul Technical University, Faculty of Mines, Department of Geology, Ayaza¤a, TR–34469 ‹stanbul, Turkey (E-mail: [email protected]) 2 Kadir Has University, Cibali Merkez Kampüsü, Cibali, TR–34230 ‹stanbul, Turkey 3 Cardiff University, Department of Earth, Ocean and Planetary Science, Cardiff, UK Abstract: Located in the northwestern part of the Aegean region, Dikili-Çandarl› volcanic suite contains products representative for the western Anatolian Miocene volcanism. They can be divided into two main groups: the Dikili and the Çandarl› groups. The Dikili group is Early–Middle Miocene in age and consists mainly of pyroclastic rocks, andesitic-dacitic lavas, lava breccia, lahar flows and associated sedimentary rocks. The lavas contain disequilibrium phenocrysts assemblages. The Çandarl› group consists of Upper Miocene–Pliocene lava and sediment associations. The volcanic rocks consist mainly of rhyolitic domes and basaltic trachyandesite-basaltic andesite lavas erupted along the NW–SE- and NE–SW-trending fault systems; the faults controlled the development of the Çandarl› depression. Major- and trace-element chemistry indicates that the lavas are dominantly high-K, calc-alkaline, intermediate to acidic in composition. Chemical and textural characteristics of the minerals reveal that mixing was a common process in the generation of this magma. In particular, petrography, textural evidence and crystal chemistry of the phenocrysts together with variations in rock compositions indicate that basaltic-basaltic andesitic magma intruded dacite magma and is partially hybridized with it.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Haziran 2017 Ege Denizi Depremi (Karaburun Açıkları)
    T.C. BAŞBAKANLIK AFET VE ACİL DURUM YÖNETİMİ BAŞKANLIĞI DEPREM DAİRESİ BAŞKANLIĞI 12 HAZİRAN 2017 EGE DENİZİ DEPREMİ (KARABURUN AÇIKLARI) ÖN DEĞERLENDİRME RAPORU 16 Haziran – 2017 ANKARA GENEL____________________________________________________________________ 12.06.2017 günü, Türkiye saati ile 15:28’te Ege Denizi (İzmir-Karaburun açıkları) merkezli bir deprem meydana gelmiştir. AFAD – TDVMS (Türkiye Deprem Veri Merkezi Sistemi)’nden alınan verilerle yapılan çözüm sonucu elde edilen büyüklük Mw= 6.2 olarak hesaplanmıştır (Şekil 1). Depremden sonra ilk bir hafta içerisinde büyüklükleri 0.8 – 5.3 arasında değişen 1311 tane artçı deprem kaydedilmiştir. Meydana gelen artçı depremlerden 14 tanesi 4.0’ten büyüktür (Tablo 1). Haziran 2017 ANKARA 1 Adres: Üniversiteler Mah. Eskişehir Yolu, Dumlupınar Bulv. No:159, 06510 Çankaya/Ankara Tel: +90 312 258 21 55 E-posta: [email protected] ; Web: http://www.deprem.gov.tr T.C. BAŞBAKANLIK AFET VE ACİL DURUM YÖNETİMİ BAŞKANLIĞI DEPREM DAİRESİ BAŞKANLIĞI GENEL____________________________________________________________________ 12.06.2017 günü, Türkiye saati ile 15:28’de Ege Denizi (İzmir-Karaburun açıkları) merkezli bir deprem meydana gelmiştir. AFAD – TDVMS (Türkiye Deprem Veri Merkezi Sistemi)’nden alınan verilerle yapılan çözüm sonucu elde edilen büyüklük Mw= 6.2 olarak hesaplanmıştır (Şekil 1). Depremden sonra ilk bir hafta içerisinde (2017.06.19 16:45 itibariyle) büyüklükleri 0.8 ile 5.3 arasında değişen 1282 tane artçı deprem kaydedilmiştir. Meydana gelen artçı depremlerden 14 tanesinin büyüklüğü
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Change Dynamics: Izmir Case, 1927-2010
    URBAN CHANGE DYNAMICS: İZMİR CASE, 1927-2010 Saygın Can OĞUZ İzmir Institute of Technology December, 2013 URBAN CHANGE DYNAMICS: İZMİR CASE, 1927-2010 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of İzmir Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPY in City and Regional Planning by Saygin Can OĞUZ December 2013 İZMİR We approve the thesis of Saygın Can OĞUZ Examining Committee Members: ___________________________________ Prof. Dr. Cemal ARKON Department of Architecture, İzmir University ___________________________________ Prof. Dr. Sezai GÖKSU Department of City and Regional Planning, Dokuz Eylül University ___________________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Semahat ÖZDEMİR Department of City and Regional Planning, İzmir Institute of Technology ___________________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. İpek ÖZBEK SÖNMEZ Department of City and Regional Planning, Dokuz Eylül University ___________________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mert ÇUBUKÇU Department of City and Regional Planning, Dokuz Eylül University 17 December 2013 ___________________________________ Prof. Dr. Cemal ARKON Supervisor, Department of Architecture İzmir University ___________________________________ _______________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Adile ARSLAN AVAR Prof. Dr. R. Tuğrul SENGER Head of the Department of City and Dean of the Graduate School of Regional Planning Engineering and Sciences ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of a dissertation is not possible without the support, assistance and encouragement of many people, some of which I hope to acknowledge here. I would like to thank Dr. Cemal Arkon, my dissertation advisor, who supported and encouraged me during the whole process. Many thanks to Dr. Semahat Özdemir and Dr. İpek Özbek Sönmez for agreeing to serve as committee advisors, and for their comments on earlier drafts and advice along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Borderland City of Turkey: Izmir from Past to the Present Eylemer, Sedef; Memişoğlu, Dilek
    www.ssoar.info The borderland city of Turkey: Izmir from past to the present Eylemer, Sedef; Memişoğlu, Dilek Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Eylemer, S., & Memişoğlu, D. (2015). The borderland city of Turkey: Izmir from past to the present. Eurolimes, 19, 159-184. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-46521-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeus in Exile: Archaeological Restitution As Politics of Memory
    Working Paper Series, 13 Zeus in Exile: Archaeological Restitution as Politics of Memory S.M. Can Bilsel Working Paper #13, Fall 2000 Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies [email protected] (609) 258-5180) The Zeus Altar of Pergamon in Berlin Overshadowed by the debates on the Holocaust Memorial or the fate of the Berlin Wall, the reunification of archaeological collections in Berlin nevertheless poses an international problem. The question is, in a way, analogous to the current sensibilities about the future of memory, as it was called by a recent conference at Princeton University. How will the past will be framed and commemorated in a reunified Germany; what constitutes the cultural heritage of the new Berlin Republic? As Berlin assumes the role of the capital, both official and popular approaches to memory of the recent past gain a vital importance. Curiously, an internationally recognized effort on the part of the federal government to commemorate the victims of the Nazi regime goes hand in hand with a systematic repression of the more recent East German past. As the American-style malls and corporate headquarters of the Postdamer Platz, once the busiest center of Europe, celebrate the victors of the Cold War, the institutions of the East German Republic are being erased from the city. New Berlin will be a city of memory, as evident in its memorials and museums. Yet it will also remain a site of amnesia and forgetting. This paper will discuss Berlin’s contested Zeus Altar and its role as a collectively negotiated construct of memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia BUDAG BUDAGOV
    BUDAG BUDAGOV Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia BUDAG BUDAGOV Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia © “Elm” Publishing House, 1997 Sponsored by VELIYEV RUSTAM SALEH oglu T ranslated by ZAHID MAHAMMAD oglu AHMADOV Edited by FARHAD MAHAMMAD oglu MUSTAFAYEV Budagov B.A. Turkic Toponyms of Eurasia. - Baku “Elm”, 1997, -1 7 4 p. ISBN 5-8066-0757-7 The geographical toponyms preserved in the immense territories of Turkic nations are considered in this work. The author speaks about the parallels, twins of Azerbaijani toponyms distributed in Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Altay, the Ural, Western Si­ beria, Armenia, Iran, Turkey, the Crimea, Chinese Turkistan, etc. Be­ sides, the geographical names concerned to other Turkic language nations are elucidated in this book. 4602000000-533 В ------------------------- 655(07)-97 © “Elm” Publishing House, 1997 A NOTED SCIENTIST Budag Abdulali oglu Budagov was bom in 1928 at the village o f Chobankere, Zangibasar district (now Masis), Armenia. He graduated from the Yerevan Pedagogical School in 1947, the Azerbaijan State Pedagogical Institute (Baku) in 1951. In 1955 he was awarded his candidate and in 1967 doctor’s degree. In 1976 he was elected the corresponding-member and in 1989 full-member o f the Azerbaijan Academy o f Sciences. Budag Abdulali oglu is the author o f more than 500 scientific articles and 30 books. Researches on a number o f problems o f the geographical science such as geomorphology, toponymies, history o f geography, school geography, conservation o f nature, ecology have been carried out by academician B.A.Budagov. He makes a valuable contribution for popularization o f science.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Knowledge on Distribution of Tardigrada in Turkey
    diversity Article Contribution to the Knowledge on Distribution of Tardigrada in Turkey Duygu Berdi * and Ahmet Altında˘g Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ankara University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 December 2019; Accepted: 4 March 2020; Published: 6 March 2020 Abstract: Tardigrades have been occasionally studied in Turkey since 1973. However, species number and distribution remain poorly known. In this study, distribution of Tardigrades in the province of Karabük, which is located in northern coast (West Black Sea Region) of Turkey, was carried out. Two moss samples were collected from the entrance of the Bulak (Mencilis) Cave. A total of 30 specimens and 14 eggs were extracted. Among the specimens; Echiniscus granulatus (Doyère, 1840) and Diaforobiotus islandicus islandicus (Richters, 1904) are new records for Karabük. Furthermore, this study also provides a current checklist of tardigrade species reported from Turkey, indicating their localities, geographic distribution and taxonomical comments. Keywords: cave; Diaforobiotus islandicus islandicus; Echiniscus granulatus; Karabük; Tardigrades; Turkey 1. Introduction Caves are not only one of the most important forms of karst, but also one of the most unique forms of karst topography in terms of both size and formation characteristics, which are formed by mechanical melting and partly chemical erosion of water [1]. Most of the caves in Turkey were developed within the Cretaceous and Tertiary limestone, metamorphic limestone [2], and up to now ca. 40 000 karst caves have been recorded in Turkey. Although, most of these caves are found in the karstic plateaus zone in the Toros System, important caves, such as Kızılelma, Sofular, Gökgöl and Mencilis, have also formed in the Western Black Sea [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Izmir Dikili Kültür Ve Turizm Koruma Ve Gelişim Bölgesi 1
    İZMİR DİKİLİ KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM KORUMA VE GELİŞİM BÖLGESİ 1/100.000 ÖLÇEKLİ ÇEVRE DÜZENİ PLANI DEĞİŞİKLİĞİ (ÇANDARLI-DİKİLİ KARAYOLU KESİMİ VE ÇEVRESİ) PLAN AÇIKLAMA RAPORU 2018 İÇİNDEKİLER İÇİNDEKİLER ........................................................................................................................................0 1. PLANLAMA ALANININ ÜLKE VE BÖLGESİNDEKİ YERİ ........................................................................1 2. PLANLAMA ALANININ YÖNETİMSEL YAPISI VE İDARİ BÖLÜNÜŞ .......................................................1 3.FİZİKSEL YAPI....................................................................................................................................2 3.1.İKLİM ........................................................................................................................................2 3.2. BİTKİ ÖRTÜSÜ ..........................................................................................................................2 3.3. JEOLOJİ ....................................................................................................................................2 3.3.1. DEPREM DURUMU ............................................................................................................2 3.3.2. PLANLAMA ALANININ JEOLOJİSİ ........................................................................................2 4. DEMOGRAFİK YAPI ..........................................................................................................................3 5.
    [Show full text]