Solitary Sandpiper Tringa Solitaria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

solitary sandpiper Tringa solitaria Kingdom: Animalia Division/Phylum: Chordata Class: Aves Order: Charadriiformes Family: Scolopacidae ILLINOIS STATUS common, native FEATURES The solitary sandpiper averages eight to nine inches in length (tail tip to bill tip in preserved specimen). The side of this bird’s tail is white with dark bars. Its upper chest feathers have dark- mottling while the lower chest feathers are white. The back and wing feathers are dark brown. A light eye ring is present. The solitary sandpiper has green legs. BEHAVIORS The solitary sandpiper is a common migrant throughout Illinois. It may be seen in the wooded edges of mudflats, woodland pools and ponds, sewage lagoons, stream edges and open mudflats. It tends to be found singly. If in groups, it is acting only as an individual. Like many sandpipers, it teeters as it moves. Spring migrants begin arriving in Illinois in late March. These birds nest in coniferous forests in Canada and Alaska. The solitary sandpiper lays its eggs in the deserted nest of a songbird. Fall migrants begin returning to Illinois in late June. This bird winters from the coast of the Gulf of Mexico to Peru, Argentina and Uruguay. The solitary sandpiper eats insects, small crustaceans, small mollusks and other aquatic animals. Its call is “peet-weet,” made while it flies. HABITATS Aquatic Habitats lakes, ponds and reservoirs; Lake Michigan; marshes; rivers and streams; swamps; temporary water supplies; wet prairies and fens Woodland Habitats none Prairie and Edge Habitats none © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2017. Biodiversity of Illinois. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland
Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland ANDREW N. HOODLESS,1 Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK CHRISTOPHER J. HEWARD, Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK ABSTRACT Migration represents a critical time in the annual cycle of Eurasian woodcock (Scolopax rusticola), with poten- tial consequences for individual fitness and survival. In October–December, Eurasian woodcock migrate from breeding grounds in northern Eurasia over thousands of kilometres to western Europe, returning in March–May. The species is widely hunted in Europe, with 2.3–3.5 million individuals shot per year; hence, an understanding of the timing of migra- tion and routes taken is an essential part of developing sustainable flyway management. Our aims were to determine the timing and migration routes of Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland, and to assess the degree of connec- tivity between breeding and wintering sites. We present data from 52 Eurasian woodcock fitted with satellite tags in late winter 2012–2016, which indicate that the timing of spring departure varied annually and was positively correlated with temperature, with a mean departure date of 26 March (± 1.4 days SE). Spring migration distances averaged 2,851 ± 165 km (SE), with individuals typically making 5 stopovers. The majority of our sample of tagged Eurasian woodcock migrated to breeding sites in northwestern Russia (54%), with smaller proportions breeding in Denmark, Scandinavia, and Finland (29%); Poland, Latvia, and Belarus (9.5%); and central Russia (7.5%). The accumulated migration routes of tagged individ- uals suggest a main flyway for Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland through Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany, and then dividing to pass through the countries immediately north and south of the Baltic Sea.
[Show full text]
202 Common Redshank Put Your Logo Here
Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 202 Common Redshank Ruff Redshank. Spring. Adult (02-V) COMMON REDSHANK (Tringa totanus ) SEXING IDENTIFICATION Plumage of both sexes alike. 27-28 cm. In spring with brownish upperparts barred dark; white rump; white tail with dark bars; wings with a broad white band on the ed- AGEING ge; white underparts with dark streaks on head, This species is a scarce breeder in Aragon, so neck and breast; red bill with dark tip; orange- only 3 age classes can be recognized: red legs. In autumn with darker colours on up- 1st year autumn with fresh plumage; median perparts: grey tinge on breast. coverts spotted pale on edge; tertials brown with buff and dark marks; pointed tail feathers; breast slightly streaked; dull reddish base of bill; yellowish legs. 2nd year spring similar to adult ; this age can be recognized only in birds with some unmoul- ted median wing coverts and/or tertials; flight feathers moderately worn. Adult with median coverts with whitish edge and dark subterminal band; tertials grey brown with variable markings: either plain or with dark sepia bars, sometimes with extensive dark markings; rounded tail feathers; underparts with variable amount of dark barring and spot- ting; reddish legs and base of bill. Redshank . Pattern of wing, tail and bill. SIMILAR SPECIES Recalls a Spotted Redhsank in autumn , without a white patch on wings and has a longer bill; Redshank. Ruff has a narrower wing band and two whi- Ageing. te bands on sides of uppertail Pattern of bill: top adult; bot- Spotted tom 1st Redshank.
[Show full text]
Tringa Glareola 2000&Rdquo
30 Workshop on Project "Tringa glareola 2000" and Seminar "Research on Wader Migration in Poland"- 21-22 November 1998, Gdynia, Poland. Magdalena Remisiewicz& Mateusz Sciborski Remisiewicz,M. & Sciborski,M. 1999.Workshop on Project"Tringa glareola 2000" andSeminar "Research on WaderMigration m Poland"- 21-22 November 1998, Gdynia, Poland.Wader Study Group Bull. 89:30 - 31 MagdalenaRemisiewicz & MateuszSciborski, Waterbird Research Group "KULING", c/o Dept. of VertebrateZoology and Ecology,Univ. of Gdansk,al. Legion6w9, 80-441 Gdansk,Poland,' E-mail.' [email protected] The WaderStudy Groupprogramme (Poland)by the WRG "KULING". keen "KULING" bird-ringers "Tringaglareola 2000", co-ordinated During the meeting,participants from succeededin catchinga male Mallard, by the WaterbirdResearch Group Poland, Sweden, Romania, Estonia and triumphantlygiving it the name "KULING" has developedremarkably Ukrainepresented the resultsof pastand "Conference". Other attractions sinceits startin 1997. Its main purpose, presentstudies on the speciesin their providedfor the guestswere two to definethe migrationroutes of Wood countries. A common set of exhibitionsprepared especially for the Sandpiperand investigate its migration measurements to be taken from Wood workshop.The "Museumof WRG strategy,seems to be met by the Sandpiperswas agreed,including new KULING" presentedhistorical pieces of methodsused. They include:colour measures(primary wear, fat score)to be equipmentused during fieldwork or ringing,dyeing, counts and tested.Topic groups, expressing specimensreferring to important observations(for more detailed individualinterests in analysing momentsin the historyof the group descriptionof the project- seeWSG particularproblems; migration (someof the exhibitswere 15 years Bull. 84: 21-22). The network of sites dynamics,recoveries, biometrics, moult, old). The other was a collection of contributinghas been growing refuelhngstrategy, were established.
[Show full text]
Biometrics and Breeding Phenology of Terek Sandpipers in the Pripyat’ Valley, S Belarus
54 Wader Study Group Bulletin Biometrics and breeding phenology of Terek Sandpipers in the Pripyat’ Valley, S Belarus NATALIA KARLIONOVA1, MAGDALENA REMISIEWICZ2, PAVEL PINCHUK1 1Institute of Zoology, Belarussian National Academy of Sciences, Academichnaya Str. 27, 220072 Minsk, Belarus. [email protected] 2Avian Ecophysiology Unit, Dept of Vertebrate Ecology and Zoology, Univ. of Gdansk, al. Legionów 9, 80-441 Gdansk, Poland. [email protected] Karlionova, N., Remisiewicz, M. & Pinchuk, P. 2006. Biometrics and breeding phenology of Terek Sandpipers in the Pripyat’ Valley, S Belarus. Wader Study Group Bull. 110: 54–58. Keywords: Terek Sandpiper, Xenus cinereus, biometrics, breeding phenology, Pripyat’ Valley, Belarus We present data on the breeding phenology and biometrics of Terek Sandpipers from the isolated westernmost population in the Pripyat’ river valley, S Belarus, close to the border with Ukraine. Studies were conducted on floodplain islands between the beginning of April and mid-July during 1996–1999 and 2002–2006. Over the years, the first arrivals appeared during 10–26 April (median 14 April), first eggs were laid during 24 April to 5 May (median 30 April) and the latest egg was laid on 25 May, first chicks hatched during 19 May to 1 June (median 25 May) and the first fledged juveniles were caught on 23 June. We present biometric data for juve- niles (at the post-fledging stage) and adults. The mean wing length of juveniles, just before departure from the breeding grounds in mid June, reached 96% of that of adults. Juvenile total head lengths were 91% of adult, and bill and nalospi lengths 85% of adult, but tarsus and tarsus plus toe lengths were the same as adults.
[Show full text]
Behaviour of an Incubating Woodcock G
Behaviour of an incubating Woodcock G. des Forges INTRODUCTION In his well-known paper on the breeding habits of the'Woodcock Scolopax rusticola, Steinfatt (1938) records: 'The brooding female only rarely changes her position during the day; she lies for hours on the nest motionless. There seems to be a sort of rigidity, which overcomes the female. It obviously serves the purpose to reduce smell and so the possibility of being observed. Only twice a day, in morning and evening twilight, the female leaves the nest, in order to find food, for a total time of an hour'. A report on the European Woodcock (Shorten 1974) states that 'Steinfatt's description of behaviour at the nest seems to have been the basis for many subse quent accounts'. Also Vesey-Fitzgerald (1946), writing of his own experience in Surrey, says, 'I do not think that, unless disturbed, a sitting Woodcock leaves the nest during the day'. As circumstantial evidence had led me to believe that a sitting Woodcock did leave the nest and feed by day, I decided to attempt a prolonged watch on an incubating bird. THE NEST SITE The nest was in woodland, about 5 km north of Haywards Heath, West Sussex, on a hill-side sloping down from the main London to Brighton railway line to a stream at the bottom of the valley. The section of the wood concerned had been cleared of undergrowth and mature ash Fraxinus excelsior in 1972/73 leaving only standard oaks Quercus. Re-planting with mixed conifers had taken place in 1973/74 m tne open areas but not immediately round the nest, which was under the canopy of a group of six mature oaks, the lowest branches being 5 or 6 metres from the ground which here carried a thin growth of brambles Rubus fruticosus and bracken Pteridium aquilinum: but around the small conifers were only short grasses and a variety of perennials which had not made much growth by the end of March.
[Show full text]
Tringa Totanus
ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Vogelwarte - Zeitschrift für Vogelkunde Jahr/Year: 1999/2000 Band/Volume: 40_1999 Autor(en)/Author(s): Meissner Wlodzimierz Artikel/Article: Biometrics of Redshanks (Tringa totanus) caught in the region of the Gulf of Gdansk during autumn migration 110-116 © Deutschen Ornithologen-Gesellschaft und Partner; download www.do-g.de; www.zobodat.at Die Vogelwarte 40, 1999: 110-116 Biometrics of Redshanks(Tringa totanus) caught in the region of the Gulf of Gdansk during autumn migration ByWlodzimierz Meissner Abstract: M e i s s n e r , W. (1999): Biometrics of Redshanks (Tringa totanus) caught in the region of the Gulf of Gdansk during autumn migration. Vogelwarte 40: 110-116. Biometrics of the Redshank migrating in autumn through the Gulf of Gdansk were studied between 1983 and 1990. A total of 78 adult Redshanks and 775 juveniles was caught and measured. On average all measurements of adults were longer than those of juveniles. Almost all measurements of juveniles differed significantly among half-month periods, but not seasonally (except wing length). There was a significant decrease in tarsus plus toe length from the second half of July to the first half of September. Similar trends were shown in total head length and wing length. These facts correspond with dates of arrival of birds from the “southern” and “northern” po pulations. Key words: Redshank (Tringa totanus), biometrics, migration, Gulf of Gdansk. Address: Department of Vertebrate Ecology & Zoology, University of Gdansk, Al. Legionow 9, 80-441 Gdansk, Poland (e-mail [email protected] ).
[Show full text]
Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax Rusticola
Key concepts of Article 7(4): Version 2008 Species no. 50: Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola Distribution: The Eurasian Woodcock has an extensive Palaearctic distribution. It breeds from the Azores and Ireland to the pacific coast of Russia. Birds winter in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, India and Southeast Asia to Japan. In Europe breeding occurs from Fennoscandia and Russia to the Mediterranean basin and the Canary Islands. Movements: Breeding populations in western maritime countries are sedentary, whilst those elsewhere are migratory. Scandinavian populations move southwest to winter mainly in Britain and France. Finnish birds move mainly south and winter mostly in Italy and the Balkans. Autumn movements start after the onset of frosts. Birds from the large Russian population are recorded wintering across most of West and Central Europe. The majority of birds are in their winter quarters by November but further (sometimes large scale) movements may occur in response to cold weather. Return migration starts in February in the Mediterranean region and the first half of March elsewhere. Population size and trends: The Woodcock is a difficult bird to count accurately. The European breeding population is estimated at 1,800,000 – 6,600,000 pairs of which 1,200,000 - 5,000,000 breeds in Russia (BirdLife Int. 2004A). The EU 27 population is estimated at 460,000 - 1,500,000 pairs (BirdLife Int. 2004A, 2004B). During 1990-2000 trends were stable across most of its European range, but declining in its Russian stronghold resulting in an overall moderate decline in Europe (>10%) (BirdLife Int. 2004A). Biological and behavioural aspects: Breeding: clutch size is usually 4 eggs (2-5); incubation 21-24 days; fledging period 15-20 days but sometimes able to get off ground at 10 days; independence: 5-6 weeks after hatching; brood: normally one brood.
[Show full text]
Rapid Population Decline in Migratory Shorebirds Relying on Yellow Sea Tidal Mudflats As Stopover Sites
ARTICLE Received 12 Apr 2016 | Accepted 9 Feb 2017 | Published 13 Apr 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14895 OPEN Rapid population decline in migratory shorebirds relying on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats as stopover sites Colin E. Studds1,2,3, Bruce E. Kendall4, Nicholas J. Murray1,5, Howard B. Wilson1, Danny I. Rogers6, Robert S. Clemens1, Ken Gosbell7, Chris J. Hassell8, Rosalind Jessop9, David S. Melville10, David A. Milton11, Clive D.T. Minton7, Hugh P. Possingham1,12, Adrian C. Riegen13, Phil Straw14, Eric J. Woehler15 & Richard A. Fuller1 Migratory animals are threatened by human-induced global change. However, little is known about how stopover habitat, essential for refuelling during migration, affects the population dynamics of migratory species. Using 20 years of continent-wide citizen science data, we assess population trends of ten shorebird taxa that refuel on Yellow Sea tidal mudflats, a threatened ecosystem that has shrunk by 465% in recent decades. Seven of the taxa declined at rates of up to 8% per year. Taxa with the greatest reliance on the Yellow Sea as a stopover site showed the greatest declines, whereas those that stop primarily in other regions had slowly declining or stable populations. Decline rate was unaffected by shared evolutionary history among taxa and was not predicted by migration distance, breeding range size, non-breeding location, generation time or body size. These results suggest that changes in stopover habitat can severely limit migratory populations. 1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072 Queensland, Australia. 2 Department of Geography and Environmental Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland 21250, USA.
[Show full text]
Solitary Sandpiper Tringa Solitaria
solitary sandpiper Tringa solitaria Kingdom: Animalia FEATURES Phylum: Chordata The solitary sandpiper averages eight to nine inches Class: Aves in length (tail tip to bill tip in preserved specimen). Order: Charadriiformes The side of this bird’s tail is white with dark bars. Its upper chest feathers have dark-mottling while the Family: Scolopacidae lower chest feathers are white. The back and wing ILLINOIS STATUS feathers are dark brown. A light eye ring is present. The solitary sandpiper has green legs. common, native BEHAVIORS The solitary sandpiper is a common migrant throughout Illinois. It may be seen in the wooded edges of mudflats, woodland pools and ponds, sewage lagoons, stream edges and open mudflats. It tends to be found singly. If in groups, it is acting only as an individual. Like many sandpipers, it teeters as it moves. Spring migrants begin arriving in Illinois in late March. These birds nest in coniferous forests in Canada and Alaska. The solitary sandpiper lays its eggs in the deserted nest of a songbird. Fall migrants begin returning to Illinois in late June. This bird winters from the coast of the Gulf of Mexico to Peru, Argentina and Uruguay. The solitary sandpiper eats insects, small crustaceans, small mollusks and other aquatic animals. Its call is “peet-weet,” made while it flies. ILLINOIS RANGE © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2020. Biodiversity of Illinois. Unless otherwise noted, photos and images © Illinois Department of Natural Resources. © Mary Kay Rubey Aquatic Habitats lakes, ponds and reservoirs; Lake Michigan; marshes; rivers and streams; swamps; temporary water supplies; wet prairies and fens Woodland Habitats none Prairie and Edge Habitats none © Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
[Show full text]
Evo01315.Pdf
Evolution. 48(21. 1994. pp. 327-350 HISTORICAL EXAMINATION OF DELAYED PLUMAGE MATURAnON IN THE SHOREBIRDS (AVES: CHARADRIIFORMES) PH1uPc. CHu Museum ofZoology and Department ofBiology, University ofMichigan, Ann Arbor. Michigan 48109 Abstract.- Delayed plumage maturation refers to the presence ofnon adultlike immature plumages (juvenal plumage excluded). It is usually considered the result of selection for distinctive first winter or first-summer appearance. In the present study, evolution ofdelayed plumage maturation is examined in the shorebirds: the sandpipers, plovers, gulls, and their allies. Nine plumage maturation characters were identified, and theirstates were superimposed onto topologies generated during two recent investigations ofshorebird relationships (Sibley and Ahlquist; revised Strauch). The characters were then optimized so as to assign character states to interior nodes of the trees in the most parsimonious way. Reconstructionsofcharacterevolution on six ofthe shortest revisedStrauchtrees were ambiguous with respect to delayed plumage maturation in the hypothetical ancestral shorebird. If plumage maturation was not delayed in the shorebird ancestor, optimization indicated that delay appeared when nonadultlike juvenal feathers were acquired. In contrast, on the single Sibley and Ahlquist tree, absence ofdelayed plumage maturation in the shorebird ancestor was indicated unambigu ously, with three evolutionary novelties (nonadultlike juvenal feathers, seasonal plumage change, and a reduced first-spring molt) implicated
[Show full text]
Pan-American Shorebird Program Shorebird Marking Protocol
Shorebird Marking Protocol – April 2016 Pan American Shorebird Program Shorebird Marking Protocol - April 2016 - Endorsed by: Shorebird Marking Protocol – April 2016 Lesley-Anne Howes, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Ottawa, ON, Canada, Sophie Béraud, Canadian Wildlife Service, ECCC, Ottawa, ON, Canada, and Véronique Drolet-Gratton, Canadian Wildlife Service, ECCC, Ottawa, ON, Canada. In consultation with: (In alphabetical order) Brad Andres, US Shorebird Conservation Plan, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood CO USA Yves Aubry, Canadian Wildlife Service, ECCC, Quebec QC, Canada Rúben Dellacasa, Aves Argentinas, BirdLife International en Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina Christian Friis, Canadian Wildlife Service, ECCC, Toronto ON, Canada Nyls de Pracontal, Groupe d’Étude et de Protection des Oiseaux en Guyane (GEPOG), Cayennne, Guyane Cheri Gratto-Trevor, Prairie and Northern Wildlife Research Centre, ECCC, Saskatoon SK, Canada Richard Johnston, Asociación Calidris, Cali, Colombia and CWE, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver BC, Canada Kevin S. Kalasz, Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife, DNREC, Smyrna DE, USA Richard Lanctot, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management, Anchorage AK, USA Sophie Maille, Groupe d’Étude et de Protection des Oiseaux en Guyane (GEPOG), Cayennne, Guyane David Mizrahi, New Jersey Audubon Society, Cape May Court House NJ, USA Bruce Peterjohn, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel MD, USA Eveling Tavera Fernandez, Centro de Ornitología y Biodiversidad
[Show full text]
Standards for Monitoring Nonbreeding Shorebirds in the Western Hemisphere
Standards for Monitoring Nonbreeding Shorebirds in the Western Hemisphere Program for Regional and International Shorebird Monitoring (PRISM) October 2018 Mike Ausman Citation: Program for Regional and International Shorebird Monitoring (PRISM). 2018. Standards for Monitoring Nonbreeding Shorebirds in the Western Hemisphere. Unpublished report, Program for Regional and International Shorebird Monitoring (PRISM). Available at: https://www.shorebirdplan.org/science/program-for-regional-and- international-shorebird-monitoring/. Primary Authors: Matt Reiter, Chair, PRISM, Point Blue Conservation Science, [email protected]; and Brad A. Andres, National Coordinator U.S. Shorebird Conservation Partnership, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, [email protected]. Acknowledgements Both current and previous members of the PRISM Committee, workshop attendees in Panama City and Colorado, and additional reviewers made this document possible: Asociación Calidris – Diana Eusse, Carlos Ruiz Birdlife International – Isadora Angarita BirdsCaribbean – Lisa Sorensen California Department of Fish and Wildlife – Lara Sparks Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service – Mark Drever, Christian Friis, Ann McKellar, Julie Paquet, Cynthia Pekarik, Adam Smith; Environment and Climate Change Canada, Science and Technology – Paul Smith Centro de Ornitologia y Biodiversidad (CORBIDI) – Fernando Angulo El Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada – Eduardo Palacios Fundación Humedales – Daniel Blanco Manomet – Stephen Brown, Rob Clay, Arne Lesterhuis, Brad Winn Museo Nacional de Costa Rica – Ghisselle Alvarado National Audubon Society – Melanie Driscoll, Matt Jeffery, Maki Tazawa Point Blue Conservation Science – Catherine Hickey, Matt Reiter Quetzalli – Salvadora Morales, Orlando Jarquin Red de Observadores de Aves y Vida Silvestre de Chile (ROC) – Heraldo Norambuena SalvaNatura – Alvaro Moises SAVE Brasil – Juliana Bosi Almeida Simon Fraser University – Richard Johnston Sociedad Audubon de Panamá – Karl Kaufman, Rosabel Miró U.S.
[Show full text]