Maars of Kamchatka (Russian Far East): the First Data

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maars of Kamchatka (Russian Far East): the First Data Maars of Kamchatka (Russian Far East): the first data Belousov Alexander, Belousova Marina Institute of Volcanology & Seismology, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky; Institute of Marine Geology & Geophysics, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk NORTH AMERICA Kamchatka - very intensive subduction- related volcanism in Pleistocene - Holocene Distribution of Pleistocene –Holocene volcanic rocks (red areas) Kamchatka - giant stratovolcanoes and extensive areas covered by monogenetic volcanoes Goals • To estimate the role of water-magma interaction in formation of monogenetic volcanoes of Kamchatka. • To distinguish factors determining location of maar-forming eruptions in Kamchatka. Maps and aerial images were used to identify the maars Totally 19 maars have been identified in Kamchatka Kenenin Maar – the youngest in Kamchatka Basalt; crater 1.6 km; 1100 BP Dal’neye Lake Maar Basaltic andesite; crater1.2 km; 3300 BP Valentina Maar – one of the oldest in Kamchatka Basalt; crater 0.8 km; Late Pleistocene Chasha Maar Rhyolite; crater1.2 km; 4600 BP Krokur Maar Basalt; crater 1.3 km; 4900 BP Maars of Kamchatka Age Crater Name Composition (Ka ) (km) Nachikinsky 10 1.6 Basalt Kenenin 1.1 1.6 Basalt Krokur 4.9 1.3 Basalt Dal’neye Lake 3.3 1.2 Basaltic andesite Valentina >10 0.8 Basalt Sukhoye Ozero >10 2.0 Basalt Koldobishe 1.2 0.3 Basalt Chasha 4.6 1.2 Rhyolite Barany 1.5 1.4 Rhyolite Temny 8.0 0.7 Basalt Khetik 0.3 Basalt ? Khodutkinsky 2.8 0.8 Rhyolite-dacite Krestovka 0.8 Basalt ? Krugloe 9 ? 0.8 Basalt ? Ilinsky 0.3 Andesite ? Age of maars Diameter of maars 7 6 5 4 3 2 Number of maars of Number 1 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Crater diameter, km Maar deposits Fallout and base surge deposits. Commonly poorly sorted – wet eruption clouds. 5 Dal'neye lake Phreatomagmatic deposits 4 Magmatic deposits Krokur 3 2 Sorting, phi units phi Sorting, 1 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Dal’neye Lake Maar Median diameter, phi units Maar deposits Rhythmic layering – pulsatory eruptive style Dal’neye Lake Maar Enriched by accidental clasts – excavation of deep craters into pre- existing rocks Chasha Maar Maar deposits High average density and blocky morphology of pyroclasts – fragmentation of quenched magma Cauliflower bomb. Dal’neye Lake Maar Dal’neye Lake Maar Maar deposits 20 Variable density of 10 pyroclasts – vesiculation 0 of magma was arrested 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 by quenching Chasha Maar 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Vesicularity, % Maar deposits Transition from dense phreato- magmatic deposits to scoria – exhausting of water in aquifer in the eruption course Dal’neye Lake Maar 50 40 Scoria clasts 30 20 10 0 20 Dense clasts Number of clasts of Number 10 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Vesicularity, % Maar deposits: clear evidence of water-magma interaction. Where do maars “like” to be formed? Dal’neye Lake Maar Common formation of maars on lowermost parts of eruptive fissures Krokur Maar Common location of maars near big lakes Maars comprise less than 1% of monogenetic volcanoes of Kamchatka. Why are they so rare? Distribution of maars Precipitation rate Highest concentration of maars is in the areas with highest precipitation rates (>1200 mm/year) Conclusions •There are at least 19 maars in Kamchatka. •Maars are relatively rare (<1% of monogenetic volcanoes of Kamchatka). •Deposits of the maars show clear evidences of water-magma interaction. •Maars are located in the wettest areas (near big lakes or see, lowermost parts of eruptive fissures). •There is a link between annual precipitation rate and concentration of maars in Kamchatka..
Recommended publications
  • Temporal Evolution of the Barombi Mbo Maar, a Polygenetic Maar-Diatreme Volcano of the Cameroon Volcanic Line*
    International Journal of Geosciences, 2014, 5, 1315-1323 Published Online October 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2014.511108 Temporal Evolution of the Barombi Mbo Maar, a Polygenetic Maar-Diatreme Volcano of the Cameroon Volcanic Line* Boris Chako Tchamabé1#, Takeshi Ohba1, Issa1, Seigo Ooki1, Dieudonné Youmen2, Sebastien Owona2, Gregory Tanyileke3, Joseph Victor Hell3 1Laboratory of Volcanology and Geochemistry, Department of Chemistry, Tokai University, Tokyo, Japan 2Department of Earth Science, Faculty of Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon 3Institute of Mining and Geological Research (IRGM), Yaoundé, Cameroon Email: #[email protected] Received 1 August 2014; revised 25 August 2014; accepted 15 September 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract The Barombi Mbo Maar (BMM), which is the largest maar in Cameroon, possesses about 126 m- thick well-preserved pyroclastic deposits sequence in which two successive paleosoil beds have been identified. The maar was thought to have been active a million years ago. However, layers stratigraphically separated by the identified paleosoils have been dated to shed lights on its age and to reconstruct the chronology of its past activity. The results showed that the BMM formed through three eruptive cycles: the first ~0.51 Ma ago, the second at ~0.2 Ma and the third ~0.08 Ma B.P. The ages indicate that the BMM maar-forming eruptions were younger than a million years. The findings also suggested that the maar is polygenetic.
    [Show full text]
  • MEKE MAAR / Republic of Turkey 1. Name and Adress of the Compiler Of
    MEKE MAAR / Republic of Turkey 1. Name and adress of the compiler of this form: Selim ERDOGAN (Hydrogeological Engineer, M.Sc) Ministry of Environment & Forestry., General Directorate of Nature Conservation & National Parks., Wetlands Division Address: Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, İstanbul Caddesi No: 98 Phone: 0090 312 3840510 / 3021 Fax: 0090 312 3842476 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated 01.02.2006 3. Country: Republic of Turkey 4. Name of the Ramsar Site Meke Maar 5. Map of Site included A site map of 1:25 000 scale and providing the characteristics indicated in the Annex III of this guideline is included in this package. a) Hard Copy: YES b) Digital (electronic) Format: YES 6. Geographical Coordinates: 33038’28’’ E., 37041’10’’ N 7. General Location: Turkey is separated into 82 administrative districts. As regards area extension, Konya is the largest district of Turkey. It’s also the 4th biggest city with approximately 2 million habitants. Meke Maar is situated in Konya district. The distance of it to the center of the city is approximately 101 km (towards the south of the district). The subdivision in which the Meke Maar is located, is Karapınar and it’s 8 km far from the site. 8. Elevation: 1004 m (minimum – the elevation of the plain on which the maar is situated) 1280 m (maximum – the elevation of the crater of the volcano) 9. Area: 202 hectares 10. Overview: Meke Maar is a volcanic system which contains typically a volcanic rock mass and a crater lake up above. However the system differs from other volcanic systems with its caldera lake surrounding the volcanic mass (See pictures in Annex 2).
    [Show full text]
  • How Polygenetic Are Monogenetic Volcanoes: Case Studies of Some Complex Maar‐Diatreme Volcanoes
    Chapter 13 How Polygenetic are Monogenetic Volcanoes: Case Studies of Some Complex Maar‐Diatreme Volcanoes Boris Chako Tchamabé, Gabor Kereszturi, Karoly Németh and Gerardo Carrasco‐Núñez Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/63486 Abstract The increasing number of field investigations and various controlled benchtop and large‐ scale experiments have permitted the evaluation of a large number of processes involved in the formation of maar‐diatreme volcanoes, the second most common type of small‐ volume subaerial volcanoes on Earth. A maar‐diatreme volcano is recognized by a volcanic crater that is cut into country rocks and surrounded by a low‐height ejecta rim com‐ posed of pyroclastic deposits of few meters to up to 200 m thick above the syn‐eruptive surface level. The craters vary from 0.1 km to up to 5 km wide and vary in depth from a few dozen meters to up to 300 m deep. Their irregular morphology reflects the simple or complex volcanic and cratering processes involved in their formation. The simplicity or complexity of the crater or the entire maar itself is usually observed in the stratigraphy of the surrounding ejecta rings. The latter are composed of sequences of successive alternating and contrastingly bedded phreatomagmatic‐derived dilute pyroclastic density currents (PDC) and fallout depositions, with occasional interbedded Strombolian‐derived spatter materials or scoria fall units, exemplifying the changes in the eruptive styles during the formation of the volcano. The entire stratigraphic sequence might be preserved as a single eruptive package (small or very thick) in which there is no stratigraphic gap or signifi‐ cant discordance indicative of a potential break during the eruption.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Monogenetic Volcanic Fields of the Western Pannonian Basin: Their Field Characteristics and Outlook for Future Research from a Global Perspective
    We are IntechOpen, the world’s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 5,400 133,000 165M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our authors are among the 154 TOP 1% 12.2% Countries delivered to most cited scientists Contributors from top 500 universities Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI) Interested in publishing with us? Contact [email protected] Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected. For more information visit www.intechopen.com 2 An Overview of the Monogenetic Volcanic Fields of the Western Pannonian Basin: Their Field Characteristics and Outlook for Future Research from a Global Perspective Károly Németh Massey University New Zealand 1. Introduction Miocene to Pleistocene basaltic volcanic fields are common in the Pannonian Basin in Central Europe (Figs 1 & 2). Included in these fields are the here described monogenetic volcanic fields of western Hungary. These volcanic fields provide excellent exposures to explore the volcanic facies architecture of monogenetic volcanoes that formed during a period of intra-continental volcanism that lasted over 6 million years (Fig. 2). Over this 6 millions of years eruptive history (Wijbrans et al., 2007), volcanic fields such as the Bakony- Balaton Highland (BBHVF) or the Little Hungarian Plain Volcanic Field (LHPVF) formed (Fig. 1) as typical low magma-flux, time-predicted fields that were largely tectonically- controlled rather than magmatically-controlled (Martin & Németh, 2004; Kereszturi et al., 2011). The preserved volcanic eruptive products of the BBHVF, including pyroclastic, effusive and intrusive rocks, have been estimated to be about 3 km3, significantly larger than those erupted through the LHPVF (Martin & Németh, 2004; Kereszturi et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond Craters Oregon's Geologic
    Text by Ellen M. Benedict, 1985 Features at stops correspond to points on a clock ago, a huge mass of hot gases, volcanic ashes, bits face. Imagine that you are standing in the middle of a of pumice and other pyroclastics (fire-broken rock) Travel And Hiking Hints clock face. Twelve o’clock is the road in front of you violently erupted. The blast – greater than the May and 6 o’clock the road behind. If you always align the 18, 1980, eruption of Mt. St. Helens – deposited a Diamond Craters is located in the high desert country clock face with the road, you should be able to locate layer of pyroclastics 30 to 130 feet thick over an area about 55 miles southeast of Burns, Oregon. It’s an the features. almost 7,000 square miles! isolated place and some precautions should be taken . when traveling in the area. Start Tour. Mileage begins halfway Pyroclastics are between milepost 40 and 41 on State normal behavior Diamond Craters has no tourist facilities. The nearest Highway 205 at the junction to Diamond. for magmas place where gasoline is sold is at Frenchglen. Turn left. (subsurface That’s the opinion held by scores of molten rocks) Keep your scientists and educators who have visited Diamond, Oregon, a small ranching community, was of rhyolitic (a vehicle on named in 1874 for Mace McCoy’s Diamond brand. volcanic material and studied the area. It has the “best and hard-packed The nearby craters soon became known as Diamond related to granite) most diverse basaltic volcanic features in the road surfaces Craters.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia): 2003–9 Results
    CHAPTER 6 OBSIDIAN PROVENANCE STUDIES ON KAMCHATKA PENINSULA (FAR EASTERN RUSSIA): 2003–9 RESULTS Andrei V. Grebennikov, Vladimir K. Popov, Michael D. Glascock, Robert J. Speakman, Yaroslav V. Kuzmin, and Andrei V. Ptashinsky Abstract: The results of obsidian provenance research on the Kamchatka Peninsula based on extensive study of the chemical composition of volcanic glasses from both ‘geological’ sources and archaeological sites are presented. At least 16 geochemical groups reflecting different sources of obsidian have been identified for Kamchatka using Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis. Seven sources of archaeological obsidian have been linked to specific geologic outcrops, with the distances between sites and obsidian sources up to 550km. At least seven geochemical groups based only on artefact analysis are also described. The use of multiple obsidian sources was a common pattern during the Palaeolithic, Neolithic, and Palaeometal periods of Kamchatkan prehistory. Keywords: Obsidian, Source Identification, Palaeolithic, Neolithic, Kamchatka Peninsula, Russian Far East Introduction 6.1, A). The main geomorphic features of the Kamchatka Peninsula are two major mountain ranges, Central and Studies of the geochemistry of waterless volcanic glasses Eastern, with a sedimentary basin between them occupied (i.e., obsidians) and sources of archaeological obsidian by the Kamchatka River drainage; mountains of the in the Russian Far East have been ongoing since the southern region; and lowlands on the western coast (Suslov early 1990s,
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Basaltic Phreatomagmatic Volcanism in West Texas: Maar Complex at Peña Mountain, Big Bend National Park ⁎ K.S
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 173 (2008) 245–264 www.elsevier.com/locate/jvolgeores Cretaceous basaltic phreatomagmatic volcanism in West Texas: Maar complex at Peña Mountain, Big Bend National Park ⁎ K.S. Befus a, , R.E. Hanson a, T.M. Lehman b, W.R. Griffin c a Department of Geology, Texas Christian University, Box 298830, Fort Worth, TX 76129, USA b Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, Box 41053, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA c Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Box 830688, Richardson, Texas 75083, USA Received 23 March 2007; accepted 25 January 2008 Available online 10 March 2008 Abstract A structurally complex succession of basaltic pyroclastic deposits produced from overlapping phreatomagmatic volcanoes occurs within Upper Cretaceous floodplain deposits in the Aguja Formation in Big Bend National Park, West Texas. Together with similar basaltic deposits recently documented elsewhere in the Aguja Formation, these rocks provide evidence for an episode of phreatomagmatic volcanism that predates onset of arc magmatism in the region in the Paleogene. At Peña Mountain, the pyroclastic deposits are ≥70 m thick and consist dominantly of tabular beds of lapillistone and lapilli tuff containing angular to fluidal pyroclasts of altered sideromelane intermixed with abundant accidental terrigenous detritus derived from underlying Aguja sediments. Tephra characteristics indicate derivation from phreatomagmatic explosions involving fine- scale interaction between magma and sediment in the shallow subsurface. Deposition occurred by pyroclastic fall and base-surge processes in near-vent settings; most base-surge deposits lack tractional sedimentary structures and are inferred to have formed by suspension sedimentation from rapidly decelerating surges.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukinrek Maars, Alaska, I. April 1977 Eruption Sequence, Petrology and Tectonic Setting
    Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 7 (1980) 11-37 11 © Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam — Printed in The Netherlands UKINREK MAARS, ALASKA, I. APRIL 1977 ERUPTION SEQUENCE, PETROLOGY AND TECTONIC SETTING JUERGEN KIENLE', PHILIP R. KYLE 2 , STEPHEN SELF', ROMAN J. MOTYKA' and VOLKER LORENZ4 ' Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99701 (U.S.A.) 'Institute of Polar Studies, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 (U.S.A.) Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755 (U.S.A.) 4 Institut fur Geowissenschaften, Johannes Gutenberg-Universitilt, 6500 Mainz (Federal Republic of Germany) (Revised version accepted September 3, 1979) ABSTRACT Kienle, J., Kyle, P.R., Self, S., Motyka, R.J. and Lorenz, V., 1980. Ukinrek Maars, Alaska, I. April 1977 eruption sequence, petrology and tectonic setting. J. Volcanol. Geo- therm. Res., 7: 11-37. During ten days of phreatomagmatic activity in early April 1977, two maars formed 13 km behind the Aleutian arc near Peulik volcano on the Alaska Peninsula. They have been named "Ukinrek Maars", meaning "two holes in the ground" in Yupik Eskimo. The western maar formed at the northwestern end of a low ridge within the first three days and is up to 170 m in diameter and 35 m in depth. The eastern maar formed during the next seven days 600 m east of West Maar at a lower elevation in a shallow saddle on the same ridge and is more circular, up to 300 m in diameter and 70 m in depth. The maars formed in terrain that was heavily glaciated in Pleistocene times.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphological Evolution and Chronology of the Eruptive Activity of the Columba and Cuevas Volcanoes (Campo De Calatrava Volcanic Field, Ciudad Real, Central Spain)
    Accepted Manuscript Geomorphological evolution and chronology of the eruptive activity of the Columba and Cuevas volcanoes (Campo de Calatrava Volcanic Field, Ciudad Real, Central Spain) Miguel Ángel Poblete Piedrabuena, Joan Martí Molist, Salvador Beato Bergua, José Luis Marino Alfonso PII: S0169-555X(19)30125-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.03.026 Reference: GEOMOR 6720 To appear in: Geomorphology Received date: 4 December 2018 Revised date: 14 March 2019 Accepted date: 25 March 2019 Please cite this article as: M.Á.P. Piedrabuena, J.M. Molist, S.B. Bergua, et al., Geomorphological evolution and chronology of the eruptive activity of the Columba and Cuevas volcanoes (Campo de Calatrava Volcanic Field, Ciudad Real, Central Spain), Geomorphology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.03.026 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Geomorphological evolution and chronology of the eruptive activity of the Columba and Cuevas volcanoes (Campo de Calatrava Volcanic Field, Ciudad Real, Central Spain) Miguel Ángel Poblete Piedrabuena1*, Joan Martí Molist2, Salvador Beato Bergua1, José Luis Marino Alfonso1 Department of Geography, University of Oviedo, Campus de El Milán, C/Amparo Pedregal, 5, Oviedo-33011, Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Cascade Volcanoes.Pptx
    South Sister, Middle Sister, North Sister from north side Broken Top 73 Schmidt & Grunder 2009 74 Geologic Map McKenzie Pass North Sister Middle Sister Schmidt & Grunder 2009 75 Schmidt & Grunder 2009 76 Schmidt & Grunder 2009 77 Schmidt & Grunder 2009 78 2 3 1 79 Caldera: Newberry Caldera 80 Newberry Volcano-Caldera with obsidian flow & maar volcano 81 Rhyolite Obsidian flow, Newberry volcano 82 Flow banding in Newberry rhyolite obsidian flow 83 Gas bubble in Newberry obsidian flow. Jack Meyer for scale 84 1300 14C yr BP Big Obsidian Flow, Newberry Caldera http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/Newberry/Images/Newberry87_aerial_big_obsidian_flow_10-87.jpg 85 Impact of water on small basaltic eruptions Francis and Oppenheimer 2004 86 East Lake Central Pumice Cone Paulina Lake http://earth-of-fire.over-blog.com/article-le-volcanisme-de-l-oregon-usa-62058434.html 87 Maar Volcano: Fort Rock Taal Maar Volcano, Philippines 88 Crater Lake Caldera Volcano with Wizard Island cinder cone 89 Phantom Ship-plumbing to vent, Mt Mazama 90 Crater Lake: Lalo Rock intra-canyon lava flow 91 Pinnacles in pyroclastic flow-cooling vents 92 Baron & Lamphere 2006 93 Baron & Lamphere 2006 94 Baron & Lamphere 2006 95 Baron & Lamphere 2006 96 Formation of Crater Lake Howell Williams (1941) (reproduced in Francis and Oppenheimer 2004) 97 1 98 2 Mt Shasta 1 Inverted topography: High Cascade lavas near Medford, OR 99 How to Make Inverted Topography 100 Inverted topography: High Cascade lavas near Medford, OR 101 Inverted topography: High Cascade lavas near Medford, OR 102 Illuminaon Rock Yocum Ridge Mississippi Head 103 Illuminaon Rock Yocum Ridge Inverted Toporaphy on Mt Hood 104 Mississippi Head Inverted Toporaphy on Mt Hood 105 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Monogenetic Volcanic Fields Koji Kiyosugi University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Monogenetic Volcanic Fields Koji Kiyosugi University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Geology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Kiyosugi, Koji, "Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Monogenetic Volcanic Fields" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4101 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Monogenetic Volcanic Fields by Koji Kiyosugi A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Charles B. Connor, Ph.D. Stephen Sparks, Ph.D. Timothy H. Dixon, Ph.D. Paul H. Wetmore, Ph.D. Rocco Malservisi, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 4, 2012 Keywords: Volcanic hazard, volcanic distribution, conduit distribution, dike distribution, nonparametric kernel method, uncertainty of recurrence rate, Monte Carlo method Copyright © 2012, Koji Kiyosugi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Charles Connor, for giving me the opportunity to work with him at the University of South Florida. I also would like to thank the rest of my committee members, Dr. Stephen Sparks, Dr. Timothy H. Dixon, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessment of Features in the Aden Crater Lava Flows, Doña Ana County, New Mexico René A
    Reassessment of features in the Aden Crater lava flows, Doña Ana County, New Mexico René A. De Hon and Richard A. Earl Department of Geography, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, Texas 78666 Abstract Introduction Aden Crater lava field, encompassing 75 km2 in The Aden Crater lava field encompassing 75 km2 in south-central New Mexico, offers excellent examples of south-central New Mexico offers excellent examples of fea- features of basalt flows associated with a shield volcano. Aerial images and recent field examination allow a tures of basalt flows associated with an Icelandic-type shield re-evaluation of the lava field’s surface features. Aden volcano. In this paper, we present interpretations of some Crater sits atop the summit of the shield (referred to of these features based on recently published work (Walker, herein as the cone) which is surfaced by channeled lavas 2009), new aerial images, and field examination of the flows merging downslope into lobate lava flows. The cone conducted in 2012 and 2014. Specifically, we identify four and its adjacent flow field are divided into five facies. flow facies that formed as a function of the rheology of lava Extending away from the cone are several features asso- ciated with inflation and collapse processes, representing during flow emplacement. We examine the mechanisms of early-formed tumuli that did not develop as completely pit formation on the flows, and revisit the relationship of pits as those farther downslope. to faults in the region. 70 Robledo 25 Mtns. Or Las Cruces gan Mtns . 10 10 D U Rio Grande Bishop’s obledo fault R Cap U D Gardner U D F Aden r Flows ank Lava Black tillo lin Mtns ield Flows Mtn.
    [Show full text]