Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Monogenetic Volcanic Fields Koji Kiyosugi University of South Florida, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Monogenetic Volcanic Fields Koji Kiyosugi University of South Florida, Kkiyosug@Mail.Usf.Edu University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Monogenetic Volcanic Fields Koji Kiyosugi University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Geology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Kiyosugi, Koji, "Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Monogenetic Volcanic Fields" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4101 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Monogenetic Volcanic Fields by Koji Kiyosugi A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Charles B. Connor, Ph.D. Stephen Sparks, Ph.D. Timothy H. Dixon, Ph.D. Paul H. Wetmore, Ph.D. Rocco Malservisi, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 4, 2012 Keywords: Volcanic hazard, volcanic distribution, conduit distribution, dike distribution, nonparametric kernel method, uncertainty of recurrence rate, Monte Carlo method Copyright © 2012, Koji Kiyosugi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Charles Connor, for giving me the opportunity to work with him at the University of South Florida. I also would like to thank the rest of my committee members, Dr. Stephen Sparks, Dr. Timothy H. Dixon, Dr. Paul H. Wetmore and Dr. Rocco Malservisi, for their support throughout these five years. I am also grateful to Dr. Diana Roman for her help as a committee member when she was at the USF. I am very thankful to Laura Connor for her help with my computational problems. I am also very grateful to Judy McIlrath for her personal support during my time in Tampa. A special thanks to Dr. Mikel Diez and Ana for their hospitality during my visit to the University of Bristol. I am grateful to Aurélie and Brian. We had field work together in San Rafael Swell in the summer of 2011. Many thanks also to volcanology group, Sylvain, Armando, Leah, Heather, Mel, John, Catie, Megan, Jacob, Ophelia, Alain, Sophie, Wayne and Mandie because they have always been very supportive as well. A special thanks also to Mary Haney and Mandy Stuck for their help and administration. I also would like to thank Prof. Kazuhiro Tanaka at the Yamaguchi University for his scientific and personal advice. I am also grateful to the National Science Foundation (NSF) for partially funding my research (Grant EAR-0910696) and to the Nuclear Waste Management Organization of Japan (NUMO) and the Obayashi Corporation for their support. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... iv ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN VOLCANO DISTRIBUTION, CRUSTAL STRUCTURE, AND P-WAVE TOMOGRAPHY: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE ABU MONOGENETIC VOLCANO GROUP, SW JAPAN .............................................................................................................6 2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................6 2.2 The Abu Monogenetic Volcano Group ............................................................7 2.3 Volcanic events in the Abu Monogenetic Volcano Group .............................10 2.4 Spatial density and temporal recurrence rate .................................................12 2.5 Seismic Tomography ......................................................................................17 2.6 Discussion ......................................................................................................18 2.7 Conclusions ....................................................................................................22 CHAPTER 3: RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DIKE AND VOLCANIC CONDUIT DISTRIBUTION IN A HIGHLY-ERODED MONOGENETIC VOLCANIC FIELD: SAN RAFAEL, UT, USA .................................................30 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................30 3.2 Geologic background .....................................................................................32 3.2.1 Conduits ..........................................................................................33 3.2.2 Dikes ...............................................................................................34 3.2.3 Sills .................................................................................................35 i 3.3 Estimating conduit and dike spatial density ...................................................35 3.4 Discussion and Conclusions ..........................................................................38 CHAPTER 4: A NEW METHOD FOR ESTIMATING RECURRENCE RATE OF VOLCANIC EVENTS ACCOUNTING FOR UNCERTAINTY IN AGE DETERMINATIONS .................................................................................46 4.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................46 4.2 Method for Recurrence Rate Estimation ........................................................50 4.3 Calculation with synthetic datasets ................................................................58 4.4 Example analyses ...........................................................................................59 4.4.1 Yucca Mountain region ...................................................................59 4.4.2 Abu Monogenetic Volcano Group ...................................................62 4.4.3 Izu-Tobu Volcano Group .................................................................64 4.5 Discussion ......................................................................................................66 4.5.1 Uncertainty of recurrence rate ........................................................66 4.5.2 Variation of recurrence rate on volcanic fields ...............................67 4.5.3 Advantages and disadvantages of the method ................................68 4.6 Conclusion .....................................................................................................70 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................80 APPENDIX A: THE CONDUITS IN THE SAN RAFAEL REGION ............................92 APPENDIX B: PERL CODE FOR THE RECURRENCE RATE CALCULATION ..................................................................................................95 APPENDIX C: INPUT FILES FOR THE RECURRENCE RATE CALCULATION OF THE YUCCA MOUNTAIN REGION ............................140 APPENDIX D: INPUT FILES FOR THE RECURRENCE RATE CALCULATION OF THE ABU MONOGENETIC VOLCANO GROUP ..............................................................................................................152 APPENDIX E: INPUT FILES FOR THE RECURRENCE RATE CALCULATION OF THE IZU-TOBU VOLCANO GROUP ..........................181 ii LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1. Vent list of the AMVG. aK-Ar dates from Kakubuchi et al. (2000). bK-Ar dates from Kimura et al. (2003). ...............................................................26 Table 3.1. Comparison of San Rafael region and other monogenetic volcanic fields. Area of volcanic field (km²) is the area included in 95th percentile contour line of conduit or volcano density map and may reflect the magmatic footprint area (Valentine and Perry, 2006). .........................................45 Table 4.1. Summary of the datasets and the results of recurrence rate calculation of volcanic fields. Mean, median and uncertainty of recurrence rates are estimated current (0 Ma) values. ..........................................................................76 Table 4.2. Summary of the dataset and the result of effusion rate calculation of the Abu Monogenetic Volcanic Group. Mean, median and uncertainty of effusion rates are estimated current (0 Ma) values. .............................................78 Table A1. The conduits in the San Rafael region. Length (L) and width (W) are read from satellite images. ...................................................................................92 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1. Location of the volcanic fields studied. ...........................................................5 Figure 2.1. Location map for the Abu Monogenetic Volcano Group. .............................24 Figure 2.2. Tectonic setting around the AMVG. (a) Distribution and E-W cross section of earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms (Depth < 30 km). Dots show hypocenters of earthquakes (Mj > 2) occurred from 1988 to 1998 based on the Japan University Network Earthquake Catalog (JUNEC). The focal mechanisms were determined by using broadband waveform data recorded by the F-net seismic network of the National Research Institute for Earth Science
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Central San Juan Caldera Cluster, Southwestern Colorado by Peter W
    Geologic Map of the Central San Juan Caldera Cluster, Southwestern Colorado By Peter W. Lipman Pamphlet to accompany Geologic Investigations Series I–2799 dacite Ceobolla Creek Tuff Nelson Mountain Tuff, rhyolite Rat Creek Tuff, dacite Cebolla Creek Tuff Rat Creek Tuff, rhyolite Wheeler Geologic Monument (Half Moon Pass quadrangle) provides exceptional exposures of three outflow tuff sheets erupted from the San Luis caldera complex. Lowest sheet is Rat Creek Tuff, which is nonwelded throughout but grades upward from light-tan rhyolite (~74% SiO2) into pale brown dacite (~66% SiO2) that contains sparse dark-brown andesitic scoria. Distinctive hornblende-rich middle Cebolla Creek Tuff contains basal surge beds, overlain by vitrophyre of uniform mafic dacite that becomes less welded upward. Uppermost Nelson Mountain Tuff consists of nonwelded to weakly welded, crystal-poor rhyolite, which grades upward to a densely welded caprock of crystal-rich dacite (~68% SiO2). White arrows show contacts between outflow units. 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CONTENTS Geologic setting . 1 Volcanism . 1 Structure . 2 Methods of study . 3 Description of map units . 4 Surficial deposits . 4 Glacial deposits . 4 Postcaldera volcanic rocks . 4 Hinsdale Formation . 4 Los Pinos Formation . 5 Oligocene volcanic rocks . 5 Rocks of the Creede Caldera cycle . 5 Creede Formation . 5 Fisher Dacite . 5 Snowshoe Mountain Tuff . 6 Rocks of the San Luis caldera complex . 7 Rocks of the Nelson Mountain caldera cycle . 7 Rocks of the Cebolla Creek caldera cycle . 9 Rocks of the Rat Creek caldera cycle . 10 Lava flows premonitory(?) to San Luis caldera complex . .11 Rocks of the South River caldera cycle .
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Reconstruction of the Archean North Rhyolite, Kidd Creek Mine, Timmins, Ontario, Canada
    January 2004 Issue 80 Volcanic Reconstruction of the Archean North Rhyolite, Kidd Creek Mine, Timmins, Ontario, Canada Michelle DeWolfe Harold L. Gibson Mineral Exploration Research Centre Laurentian University Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5, Email: [email protected] David Richardson Falconbridge Limited Kidd Mining Division, PO Box 2002, Hwy 655, Timmins, Ontario, P4N 7K1 John Ayer Ontario Geological Survey Willet Green Miller Centre, Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 6B5 Fig. 1. General geology map showing the Abitibi greenstone belt and Introduction the location of the Kidd Creek mine approximately 24 km north of A succession of volcanic rocks collectively known as the Timmins (modified from Bleeker and Hester, 1999). North Rhyolite (NR) is located directly northeast of the giant Kidd Creek Cu-Zn-Ag volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) thermal alteration away from the deposit. Understanding the deposit, within the Abitibi greenstone belt of the Superior prov- large-scale volcanic environment, which hosts the NR and the ince (Figs. 1 and 2). The NR has been interpreted as a lateral Kidd Creek orebodies, will allow a better comparison between extension of the Kidd Creek mine stratigraphy (Hannington et the environment in which the Kidd Creek deposit formed and the al., 1999a). However, detailed work on the stratigraphy and environment of formation for other VMS deposits. This may structure of the NR, and its relationship to the mine stratigraphy, also help to create a better understanding of the environments
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Evolution of the Barombi Mbo Maar, a Polygenetic Maar-Diatreme Volcano of the Cameroon Volcanic Line*
    International Journal of Geosciences, 2014, 5, 1315-1323 Published Online October 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2014.511108 Temporal Evolution of the Barombi Mbo Maar, a Polygenetic Maar-Diatreme Volcano of the Cameroon Volcanic Line* Boris Chako Tchamabé1#, Takeshi Ohba1, Issa1, Seigo Ooki1, Dieudonné Youmen2, Sebastien Owona2, Gregory Tanyileke3, Joseph Victor Hell3 1Laboratory of Volcanology and Geochemistry, Department of Chemistry, Tokai University, Tokyo, Japan 2Department of Earth Science, Faculty of Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon 3Institute of Mining and Geological Research (IRGM), Yaoundé, Cameroon Email: #[email protected] Received 1 August 2014; revised 25 August 2014; accepted 15 September 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract The Barombi Mbo Maar (BMM), which is the largest maar in Cameroon, possesses about 126 m- thick well-preserved pyroclastic deposits sequence in which two successive paleosoil beds have been identified. The maar was thought to have been active a million years ago. However, layers stratigraphically separated by the identified paleosoils have been dated to shed lights on its age and to reconstruct the chronology of its past activity. The results showed that the BMM formed through three eruptive cycles: the first ~0.51 Ma ago, the second at ~0.2 Ma and the third ~0.08 Ma B.P. The ages indicate that the BMM maar-forming eruptions were younger than a million years. The findings also suggested that the maar is polygenetic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineralogy and Chemistry of the Anorogenic Tertiary Silicic Volcanics
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 86, NO. Bll, PAGES 10242-10256, NOVEMBER 10, 1981 The Mineralogyand Chemistryof the AnorogenicTertiary SilicicVolcanics of S.E. Queenslandand N.E. New South Wales, Australia A. EWART Departmentof Geology& Mineralogy,University of Queensland,St. Lucia,Brisbane, Queensland 4067 The Late Oligocene-EarlyMiocene volcanismof this regionis chemicallystrongly bimodal; the mafic lavas(volmetrically dominant) comprise basalts, hawaiites, and tholeiiticandesites, while the silicic eruptivesare mainly comendites,potassic trachytes, and potassic,high-silica rhyolites.The comendites and rhyoliteshave distinctivetrace element abundancepatterns, notably the extreme depletionsof Sr, Ba, Mg, Mn, P, Cr, V, and Eu, and the variable em'ichraentof suchelements as Rb, Zr, Pb, Nb, Zn, U, and Th. The trachytesexhibit thesecharacteristics to lesserdegrees. The comenditesare distinguished from the rhyolitesby their overall relative enrichmentof the more highly chargedcations (e.g., LREE, Nb, Y, and especiallyZr) and Zn. The phenocrystmineralogy of the trachytesand rhyolitescomprises various combinationsof the following phases:sodic plagioclase(albite-andesine), calcic anorthoclase, sanidine, quartz, ferroaugite-ferrohedenbergite,ferrohypersthene, fayalitic olivine, ilmenite, titano- magnetite,and rarely biotite (near annite) and Fe-hastingsiticamphibole. Accessories include apatite, zircon, chevkinite (ferrohedenbergite-bearingrhyolites only), and allanite (amphibole and botite rhyo- lites only). The comenditesgenerally contain
    [Show full text]
  • (2000), Voluminous Lava-Like Precursor to a Major Ash-Flow
    Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 98 (2000) 153–171 www.elsevier.nl/locate/jvolgeores Voluminous lava-like precursor to a major ash-flow tuff: low-column pyroclastic eruption of the Pagosa Peak Dacite, San Juan volcanic field, Colorado O. Bachmanna,*, M.A. Dungana, P.W. Lipmanb aSection des Sciences de la Terre de l’Universite´ de Gene`ve, 13, Rue des Maraıˆchers, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland bUS Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd, Menlo Park, CA, USA Received 26 May 1999; received in revised form 8 November 1999; accepted 8 November 1999 Abstract The Pagosa Peak Dacite is an unusual pyroclastic deposit that immediately predated eruption of the enormous Fish Canyon Tuff (ϳ5000 km3) from the La Garita caldera at 28 Ma. The Pagosa Peak Dacite is thick (to 1 km), voluminous (Ͼ200 km3), and has a high aspect ratio (1:50) similar to those of silicic lava flows. It contains a high proportion (40–60%) of juvenile clasts (to 3–4 m) emplaced as viscous magma that was less vesiculated than typical pumice. Accidental lithic fragments are absent above the basal 5–10% of the unit. Thick densely welded proximal deposits flowed rheomorphically due to gravitational spreading, despite the very high viscosity of the crystal-rich magma, resulting in a macroscopic appearance similar to flow- layered silicic lava. Although it is a separate depositional unit, the Pagosa Peak Dacite is indistinguishable from the overlying Fish Canyon Tuff in bulk-rock chemistry, phenocryst compositions, and 40Ar/39Ar age. The unusual characteristics of this deposit are interpreted as consequences of eruption by low-column pyroclastic fountaining and lateral transport as dense, poorly inflated pyroclastic flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Source to Surface Model of Monogenetic Volcanism: a Critical Review
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021 Source to surface model of monogenetic volcanism: a critical review I. E. M. SMITH1 &K.NE´ METH2* 1School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2Volcanic Risk Solutions, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Small-scale volcanic systems are the most widespread type of volcanism on Earth and occur in all of the main tectonic settings. Most commonly, these systems erupt basaltic magmas within a wide compositional range from strongly silica undersaturated to saturated and oversatu- rated; less commonly, the spectrum includes more siliceous compositions. Small-scale volcanic systems are commonly monogenetic in the sense that they are represented at the Earth’s surface by fields of small volcanoes, each the product of a temporally restricted eruption of a composition- ally distinct batch of magma, and this is in contrast to polygenetic systems characterized by rela- tively large edifices built by multiple eruptions over longer periods of time involving magmas with diverse origins. Eruption styles of small-scale volcanoes range from pyroclastic to effusive, and are strongly controlled by the relative influence of the characteristics of the magmatic system and the surface environment. Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license. Small-scale basaltic magmatic systems characteris- hazards associated with eruptions, and this is tically occur at the Earth’s surface as fields of small particularly true where volcanic fields are in close monogenetic volcanoes. These volcanoes are the proximity to population centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of a Volcanic Eruption: Case Study: Mt. St. Helens
    Anatomy of a Volcanic Eruption: Case Study: Mt. St. Helens Materials Included in this Box: • Teacher Background Information • 3-D models of Mt. St. Helens (before and after eruption) • Examples of stratovolcano rock products: Tuff (pyroclastic flow), pumice, rhyolite/dacite, ash • Sandbox crater formation exercise • Laminated photos/diagrams Teacher Background There are several shapes and types of volcanoes around the world. Some volcanoes occur on the edges of tectonic plates, such as those along the ‘ring of fire’. But there are also volcanoes that occur in the middle of tectonic plates like the Yellowstone volcano and Kilauea volcano in Hawaii. When asked to draw a volcano most people will draw a steeply sided, conical mountain that has a depression (crater) at the top. This image of a 'typical' volcano is called a stratovolcano (a.k.a. composite volcano). While this is the often visualized image of a volcano, there are actually many different shapes volcanoes can be. A volcano's shape is mostly determined by the type of magma/lava that is created underneath it. Stratovolcanoes get their shape because of the thick, sticky (viscous) magma that forms at subduction zones. This magma/lava is layered between ash, pumice, and rock fragments. These layers of ash and magma will build into high elevation, steeply sided, conical shaped mountains and form a 'typical' volcano shape. Stratovolcanoes are also known for their explosive and destructive eruptions. Eruptions can cause clouds of gas, ash, dust, and rock fragments to eject into the atmosphere. These clouds of ash can become so dense and heavy that they quickly fall down the side of the volcanoes as a pyroclastic flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 7 Igneous Rocks IGNEOUS ROCKS
    Module 7 Igneous Rocks IGNEOUS ROCKS ▪ Igneous Rocks form by crystallization of molten rock material IGNEOUS ROCKS ▪ Igneous Rocks form by crystallization of molten rock material ▪ Molten rock material below Earth’s surface is called magma ▪ Molten rock material erupted above Earth’s surface is called lava ▪ The name changes because the composition of the molten material changes as it is erupted due to escape of volatile gases Rocks Cycle Consolidation Crystallization Rock Forming Minerals 1200ºC Olivine High Ca-rich Pyroxene Ca-Na-rich Amphibole Intermediate Na-Ca-rich Continuous branch Continuous Discontinuous branch Discontinuous Biotite Na-rich Plagioclase feldspar of liquid increases liquid of 2 Temperature decreases Temperature SiO Low K-feldspar Muscovite Quartz 700ºC BOWEN’S REACTION SERIES Rock Forming Minerals Olivine Ca-rich Pyroxene Ca-Na-rich Amphibole Na-Ca-rich Continuous branch Continuous Discontinuous branch Discontinuous Biotite Na-rich Plagioclase feldspar K-feldspar Muscovite Quartz BOWEN’S REACTION SERIES Rock Forming Minerals High Temperature Mineral Suite Olivine • Isolated Tetrahedra Structure • Iron, magnesium, silicon, oxygen • Bowen’s Discontinuous Series Augite • Single Chain Structure (Pyroxene) • Iron, magnesium, calcium, silicon, aluminium, oxygen • Bowen’s Discontinuos Series Calcium Feldspar • Framework Silicate Structure (Plagioclase) • Calcium, silicon, aluminium, oxygen • Bowen’s Continuous Series Rock Forming Minerals Intermediate Temperature Mineral Suite Hornblende • Double Chain Structure (Amphibole)
    [Show full text]
  • MEKE MAAR / Republic of Turkey 1. Name and Adress of the Compiler Of
    MEKE MAAR / Republic of Turkey 1. Name and adress of the compiler of this form: Selim ERDOGAN (Hydrogeological Engineer, M.Sc) Ministry of Environment & Forestry., General Directorate of Nature Conservation & National Parks., Wetlands Division Address: Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, İstanbul Caddesi No: 98 Phone: 0090 312 3840510 / 3021 Fax: 0090 312 3842476 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated 01.02.2006 3. Country: Republic of Turkey 4. Name of the Ramsar Site Meke Maar 5. Map of Site included A site map of 1:25 000 scale and providing the characteristics indicated in the Annex III of this guideline is included in this package. a) Hard Copy: YES b) Digital (electronic) Format: YES 6. Geographical Coordinates: 33038’28’’ E., 37041’10’’ N 7. General Location: Turkey is separated into 82 administrative districts. As regards area extension, Konya is the largest district of Turkey. It’s also the 4th biggest city with approximately 2 million habitants. Meke Maar is situated in Konya district. The distance of it to the center of the city is approximately 101 km (towards the south of the district). The subdivision in which the Meke Maar is located, is Karapınar and it’s 8 km far from the site. 8. Elevation: 1004 m (minimum – the elevation of the plain on which the maar is situated) 1280 m (maximum – the elevation of the crater of the volcano) 9. Area: 202 hectares 10. Overview: Meke Maar is a volcanic system which contains typically a volcanic rock mass and a crater lake up above. However the system differs from other volcanic systems with its caldera lake surrounding the volcanic mass (See pictures in Annex 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Pyroclastic Flow Hazards
    Pyroclastic Flow Hazards Lecture Objectives -definition and characteristics -generation of pyroclastic flows -impacts and hazards What are pyroclastic flows? Pyroclastic flows are high- density mixtures of hot, dry rock fragments and hot gases that move away from the vent that erupted them at high speeds. Generation Mechanisms: -explosive eruption of molten or solid rock fragments, or both. -non-explosive eruption of lava when parts of dome or a thick lava flow collapses down a steep slope. Most pyroclastic flows consist of two parts: a basal flow of coarse fragments that moves along the ground, and a turbulent cloud of ash that rises above the basal flow. Ash may fall from this cloud over a wide area downwind from the pyroclastic flow. Mt. St. Helens Effects of pyroclastic flows A pyroclastic flow will destroy nearly everything in its path. With rock fragments ranging in size from ash to boulders traveling across the ground at speeds typically greater than 80 km per hour, pyroclastic flows knock down, shatter, bury or carry away nearly all objects and structures in their way. The extreme temperatures of rocks and gas inside pyroclastic flows, generally between 200°C and 700°C, can cause combustible material to burn, especially petroleum products, wood, vegetation, and houses. Pyroclastic flows vary considerably in size and speed, but even relatively small flows that move <5 km from a volcano can destroy buildings, forests, and farmland. On the margins of pyroclastic flows, death and serious injury to people and animals may result from burns and inhalation of hot ash and gases. Pyroclastic flows generally follow valleys or other low-lying areas and, depending on the volume of rock debris carried by the flow, they can deposit layers of loose rock fragments to depths ranging from less than one meter to more than 200 m.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique Volcanic Field in Tharsis, Mars: Monogenetic Cinder Cones and Lava Flows As Evidence for Hawaiian Eruptions
    42nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2011) 1379.pdf A UNIQUE VOLCANIC FIELD IN THARSIS, MARS: MONOGENETIC CINDER CONES AND LAVA FLOWS AS EVIDENCE FOR HAWAIIAN ERUPTIONS. P. Brož1 and E. Hauber2, 1Institute of Geophysics ASCR, v.v.i., Prague, Czech Republic, [email protected], 2Institut für Planetenforschung, DLR, Berlin, Germany, [email protected]. Introduction: Most volcanoes on Mars that have Data: We use images from several cameras, i.e. been studied so far seem to be basaltic shield volca- Context Camera (CTX), High Resolution Stereo Cam- noes, which can be very large with diameters of hun- era (HRSC), and High Resolution Imaging Science dreds of kilometers [e.g., 1] or much smaller with di- Experiment (HiRISE) for morphological analyses. ameters of several kilometers only [2]. Few Viking Topographic information (e.g., heights and slope an- Orbiter-based studies reported the possible existence gles) were determined from single shots of the Mars of cinder cones [3,4] or stratovolcanoes [5-7], and only Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) in a GIS environ- the advent of higher-resolution data led to the tentative ment, and from stereo images (HRSC, CTX) and de- interpretation of previously unknown edifices as cinder rived gridded digital elevation models (DEM). cones [8] or rootless cones [9]. The identification of Morphometry: For comparison between the cinder cones can constrain the nature of eruption proc- cones and terrestrial morphological analogues (i.e. esses and, indirectly, our understanding of the nature cinder cones [10]) we determined some basic mor- of parent magmas (e.g., volatile content). Here we re- phometric properties and their ratios (e.g., crater di- port on our observation of a unique cluster of possible ameter [WCR] vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science Behind Volcanoes
    The Science Behind Volcanoes A volcano is an opening, or rupture, in a planet's surface or crust, which allows hot magma, volcanic ash and gases to escape from the magma chamber below the surface. Volcanoes are generally found where tectonic plates are diverging or converging. A mid-oceanic ridge, for example the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, has examples of volcanoes caused by divergent tectonic plates pulling apart; the Pacific Ring of Fire has examples of volcanoes caused by convergent tectonic plates coming together. By contrast, volcanoes are usually not created where two tectonic plates slide past one another. Volcanoes can also form where there is stretching and thinning of the Earth's crust in the interiors of plates, e.g., in the East African Rift, the Wells Gray-Clearwater volcanic field and the Rio Grande Rift in North America. This type of volcanism falls under the umbrella of "Plate hypothesis" volcanism. Volcanism away from plate boundaries has also been explained as mantle plumes. These so- called "hotspots", for example Hawaii, are postulated to arise from upwelling diapirs with magma from the core–mantle boundary, 3,000 km deep in the Earth. Erupting volcanoes can pose many hazards, not only in the immediate vicinity of the eruption. Volcanic ash can be a threat to aircraft, in particular those with jet engines where ash particles can be melted by the high operating temperature. Large eruptions can affect temperature as ash and droplets of sulfuric acid obscure the sun and cool the Earth's lower atmosphere or troposphere; however, they also absorb heat radiated up from the Earth, thereby warming the stratosphere.
    [Show full text]