<<

Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

Source to surface model of monogenetic : a critical review

I. E. M. SMITH1 &K.NE´ METH2* 1School of Environment, University of Auckland, Auckland, 2Volcanic Risk Solutions, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand *Correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract: Small-scale volcanic systems are the most widespread type of volcanism on and occur in all of the main tectonic settings. Most commonly, these systems erupt basaltic within a wide compositional range from strongly silica undersaturated to saturated and oversatu- rated; less commonly, the spectrum includes more siliceous compositions. Small-scale volcanic systems are commonly monogenetic in the sense that they are represented at the Earth’s surface by fields of small volcanoes, each the product of a temporally restricted eruption of a composition- ally distinct batch of , and this is in contrast to polygenetic systems characterized by rela- tively large edifices built by multiple eruptions over longer periods of time involving magmas with diverse origins. Eruption styles of small-scale volcanoes range from pyroclastic to effusive, and are strongly controlled by the relative influence of the characteristics of the magmatic system and the surface environment.

Gold Open Access: This article is published under the terms of the CC-BY 3.0 license.

Small-scale basaltic magmatic systems characteris- hazards associated with eruptions, and this is tically occur at the Earth’s surface as fields of small particularly true where volcanic fields are in close monogenetic volcanoes. These volcanoes are the proximity to population centres. An example is the produced by explosive and effusive erup- Trans-Mexican , containing the Chi- tions triggered by the rise of small batches of chinautzen and Michoaca´n-Guanajuato volcanic magma. Their typical occurrence as volcanic fields fields (Hasenaka & Carmichael 1987; Siebe et al. is the surface expression of a magmatic plumbing 2004; Johnson et al. 2008; Erlund et al. 2010; Cebria´ system that is spatially dispersed and episodic. et al. 2011), and including the historically active Small-scale basaltic volcanic systems are the most volcanoes Parı´cutin (1943–52) and Jorullo (1759– widespread form of on planet Earth 74). The Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt has seen (Can˜o´n-Tapia & Walker 2004) (Fig. 1), although much research, in part due to the opportunity they are also the smallest in terms of erupted afforded by these historical eruptions, but also magma volume. They are often overlooked in the because it is an extensive field which poses risks large-scale purview of plate , although to large population centres including City they occur in all of the major tectonic environ- (Siebe & Macias 2006). Another area of extensive ments, intraplate, extensional and - study is the western USA, where research has been related (Can˜o´n-Tapia 2016), providing continuous undertaken in the Cima of expression of the interaction between the physi- (Dohrenwend et al. 1986; Wilshire et al. 1991; Far- cal–chemical parameters of the rising magma and mer et al. 1995; Kereszturi & Ne´meth 2016), several the external environmental conditions that influence small cones and fields in (Ho 1991; their eruption styles. The temporal record of mono- Bradshaw et al. 1993; Bradshaw & Smith 1994; genetic fields is skewed towards younger Valentine & Keating 2007; Valentine & Perry epochs because their relatively small volumes ren- 2007; Valentine & Hirano 2010), and the Springer- der them prone to removal from the terrestrial ville (Condit et al. 1989; Condit & Connor 1996), geological record. Further, they are mostly known San Francisco (Tanaka et al. 1986), Zuni-Bandera from the subaerial record because of the relative (Menzies et al. 1991; Peters et al. 2008) and Geron- inaccessibility of small volcano fields in ocean-floor imo (Menzies et al. 1985) fields of . Fields environments. in NE have been the subject of several papers The last decade has seen a renewed interest in the (Hsu & Chen 1998; Zou et al. 2003; McGee et al. , , structural and tectonic 2015), and recently there have been a number of controls, as well as volcanic hazard and risk studies geochemically based studies into the longer-lived of small-volume basaltic volcanism. Many studies Newer Volcanic Province in southern Australia have been motivated by a need to understand the (Jordan et al. 2013, 2015; Boyce et al. 2014, 2015;

From:Ne´meth, K., Carrasco-Nu´n˜ez, G., Aranda-Go´mez,J.J.&Smith, I. E. M. (eds) Monogenetic Volcanism. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 446, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP446.14 # 2017 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London. Publishing disclaimer: www.geolsoc.org.uk/pub_ethics Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

Fig. 1. Map of younger than Pliocene monogenetic volcanic fields and other important volcanoes extensively studied in recent years or mentioned in this paper. Please note that this collection is not complete. There are numerous less known monogenetic volcanic fields mostly in Central Asia, along the East African systems, Ethiopia, along the (mostly in , and ) and some in the SW USA not listed in this collection due to incomplete information. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Fig. 1. (Continued) Please note that this map also does not show volcanic fields associated with large island volcanoes of the , or . Yellow stars refer to volcanic fields (VF); red stars show important polygenetic volcanoes associated with numerous small-volume satelite vents commonly cited in monogenetic volcanism literature (mostly from their morphological aspects); and green stars represent iconic monogenetic volcanoes. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

Van Otterloo et al. 2014; Blaikie et al. 2015; van volcanoes are relatively more Si-rich and are less Otterloo & Cas 2016). alkaline (McGee et al. 2015). This compositional Studies of small-volume basaltic systems have pattern is readily explained in terms of the ambi- ranged from covering single centres such as Udo ent parameters within the magma source region, volcano, Jeju Island, Korea (Brenna et al. 2010), with the –tholeiite range representing Chagwido, Jeju Island, Korea (Brenna et al. 2015), increasing proportions of (Fig. 2). Mt Gambier, Australia (Van Otterloo et al. 2014), Primary magma produced in equilibrium with and Parı´cutin, Mexico (Erlund et al. 2010; Cebria´ residual lithologies is identifiable by virtue et al. 2011), or several centres in one field such as of its Mg/Fe ratio (usually expressed as the Mg the two most recent eruptions at the Wudalianchi number ((100 × mol MgO)/(mol MgO + mol field in NE China (Zou et al. 2003; Xiao & Wang FeO)) based on the partitioning of Roeder & Emslie 2009; Gao et al. 2013; Zhao et al. 2014), and two 1970). However, truly primary magmas are only centres from the Newer Volcanic Province of Aus- rarely erupted at the Earth’s surface. Overwhelm- tralia (Demidjuk et al. 2007), to the scale of a ingly, the chemical composition of basaltic magma whole field such as, for instance, the west Anatolian reveals that they have experienced some degree of Volcanic Field of Turkey (Ersoy et al. 2010, 2012a, fractionation, mixing and, in some cases, contami- b; Ersoy & Palmer 2013), various volcanic fields in nation by cognate or exotic (crustal) material. (Haase et al. 2004), Hungary (Harangi The compositions of the magmas that leave the et al. 2015) and the Czech Republic (Cajz et al. melt production zone in the deeper levels of a sys- 2009), part of the Central European Volcanic Prov- tem are not easily determined due to the effects of ince (CEVP), and the South Auckland Volcanic multiple shallow-level processes. This is because Field of New Zealand (Cook et al. 2005), or a most volcanic systems are long-lived zones where whole country or region such as the whole of South rising magmas stall, evolve and interact with pre- Korea (Choi et al. 2006), the whole of New Zealand ceding batches of magma and their solidified or par- (Timm et al. 2010) and the whole of NE China tially solidified equivalents. Relatively primitive (Zhang et al. 1995). Although there are some pub- magma compositions are more likely to occur in lished theoretical (Takada 1994) and/or experimen- the small-scale basaltic fields of continental envi- tal studies of monogenetic volcanism (Reiners & ronments, which are characterized by sparse infre- Nelson 1998; Hirschmann et al. 2003), they are quent eruptions, rather than in the persistent highly relatively sparse. productive systems established at plate margin and In this paper we review the current state of intraplate centres. knowledge of small-scale volcanism from their Small-scale magmatic systems often erupt basal- source in the to the eruption character- tic magmas that contain of spinel- and istics of their surface environment. -bearing lherzolite which have equilibrated at pressures and temperatures that lie on the local geotherm (O’Reilly & Griffin 1985; Sutherland The spectrum et al. 1994). Because the xenoliths are significantly denser that their host magmas, ascent must have are fundamentally the product of partial been rapid (.1022 –10m s21) (Spera 1984; Szabo´ melting processes within the Earth, and their com- & Bodnar 1996) and continuous from the depth of positions are an expression of the temperature and entrapment (Lensky et al. 2006). In these pressure regimes that exist in the outer ,150 km cases, the host magmas have Mg numbers lower of the Earth. Basalt magmas occur in response to a than that of primary mantle-derived liquids (Irving range of environments within this P–T envelope. & Price 1981; Reay et al. 1991; Camp & Roobol Chemical compositions displayed by the basalt 1992) and so must have undergone some fraction- from strongly Si-undersaturated ation before entraining their xenoliths. This is con- nephelinite (and even more extreme carbonitites) sistent with geochemical evidence for magma through to silica-saturated tholeiite. evolution at high pressures (Smith et al. 2008) and The determining parameters of this compositional the duplication of evolved magma compositions in range are essentially pressure (depth) and tempera- crystallization experiments carried out at high pres- ture (Putirka 2005; Herzberg et al. 2007; Putirka sures (Irving & Green 2008). On the other hand, the et al. 2007), which in turn constrain the mantle and geochemistry of basalts from highly dynamics responsible for melting. productive systems such as Hawaii, Reunion and There is a significant positive correlation Iceland are dominated by the effects of low-pressure between the volume of individual magma batches fractional crystallization, magma mixing and and their position within the basaltic compositional mush entrainment (Wright 1973; Albarede et al. spectrum. Small-volume volcanoes are more alka- 1997), together with some deeper crystallization line and more Si undersaturated, and larger volume (Putirka et al. 1996; Putirka 1997; Maclennan Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Fig. 2. Examples of compositional variation in monogenetic systems from intraplate ( symbol), extensional (square symbol) and subduction-related (triangular symbol) environments, illustrating the compositional range of primitive magmas (Mg# .65: solid symbols) and the trajectories of evolved (open symbols) compositions.

2008). At the less productive oceanic hotspots of (1987) and Clague & Dixon (2000) have shown the Azores (Gente et al. 2003) and Canary Islands how this spectrum is expressed by the correlated (Fullea et al. 2015), clinopyroxene–melt barometry petrogenesis, petrology and volcanic output rates and petrographical observations show that magma of Hawaiian as the hot centre of the Hawaiian batches partially crystallize and mix with pre- hotspot is approached, over-ridden and then aban- existing magma batches in a zone of temporary doned by the drifting Pacific . In sum- magma storage at near and sub-Moho depths of mary, the characteristic feature of small-scale 15–40 km (Hansteen et al. 1998; Schwarz et al. basaltic volcanic systems is the relatively simple 2004; Klugel et al. 2005; Galipp et al. 2006; Long- and dispersed nature of their plumbing systems. pre´ et al. 2009; Stroncik et al. 2009). Mid-ocean The size, depth and longevity of transport, together ridges are dominated by fractional crystallization with the existence of storage areas beneath a vol- and mixing within shallow (,7 km) magma cham- cano, influence the eruptive patterns and the geo- bers or sills (Pan & Batiza 2003), with slower physical and geochemical signals associated with spreading centres fed by dispersed polybaric magma volcanic unrest, as well as the complexity of the pet- batches that crystallize and evolve at depths of up to rogenetic that must be revealed in order to 30 km (Herzberg & O’Hara 1998; Herzberg 2004). constrain the conditions of melt generation that ulti- These examples serve to illustrate a fundamental mately drive the volcanic system. aspect of the spectrum of basaltic magmatic sys- tems: that those with relatively high magma produc- tion rates evolve by crystallization and mixing at Compositional variations within shallow depths, whereas, in less productive systems, small-scale volcanoes magma stalls within a deeper zone of less permanent storage bodies unless ascent rates are sufficient to A notable feature of many small-scale volcanic overcome the gravitational constraints. Clague cones is the systematic change in the chemical Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH compositions of erupting magma during the course examples are the scoria cone and associated of an eruption (Ne´meth et al. 2003; Smith et al. fields of Parı´cutin (active 1943–52) (Luhr & Simkin 2008; Brenna et al. 2010, 2011, 2012a; McGee 1993; Erlund et al. 2010) or Jorullo (active 1759–74) et al. 2012). Rarely, there are examples of volcanic (Guilbaud et al. 2011) in the central Mexican Volca- cones that show no compositional variation. Com- nic Belt and Mirador, southern Chile (April–May positional variation has been observed even in 1979) (Lopez-Escobar & Moreno 1981). very-small-volume cones and in these the system- A problem arises because the eruptions of most atic variations are often very clearly correlated so-called monogenetic volcanoes were not wit- with stratigraphy. The general pattern is for material nessed, although continuous deposit sequences and erupted early in a sequence to be relatively evolved the relatively small volumes typical of monogenetic and for compositions to become progressively more cones strongly support short timescales (Ne´meth primitive as an eruption progresses. These patterns 2010; Ne´meth & Kereszturi 2015). In contrast, a have been interpreted as due to fractionation of mag- polygenetic volcano is one that erupts many times, mas at high pressures close to their source (Smith is fed through an established conduit system that et al. 2008). In larger volume cones more compli- has a relatively long lifespan and delivers discrete cated compositional patterns have been observed eruptive phases separated by clear temporal breaks (e.g. Brenna et al. 2010) and interpreted as the result traceable in the erupted sequence (Manville et al. of mixing and mingling of discrete melts in the 2009). In concept, the difference between monoge- deeper parts of their system. Compositional discon- netic and polygenetic volcanoes is one of plumbing tinuities occurring during the course of a monoge- (Fig. 3). In monogenetic systems, batches of magma netic eruption sequence have also been observed rise quickly to the surface through simple conduit (McGee et al. 2012, 2013) and interpreted as succes- systems with little interaction with the crustal sive partial melting of distinct, but contiguous, rocks that they encounter on their way. Polygenetic source components with differing melting charac- volcanoes result from plumbing systems that teristics in a heterogeneous source. involve the development of magma chambers which These marked compositional variations dis- show complex interactions with surrounding crustal played within small-volume magma batches are an rocks and extensive evolution through crystal frac- important feature of small-scale basaltic volcanoes, tionation, magma mixing and magma mingling and are an indication of their close connection with (Fig. 2). One effect of this contrast in plumbing the high-pressure regions of their respective source styles is that the magmas of monogenetic systems regions and the rapidity with which magmas rise are relatively primitive (McGee & Smith 2016), from these depths. reflecting their compositional connection with their mantle sources, whereas magma of polygenetic volcanoes are more commonly chemically evolved The monogenetic concept through the operation of assimilation and fractional crystallization in crustal reservoirs. Small-volume volcanic cones are usefully termed A further concept which is fundamental to monogenetic and they characteristically occur in monogenetic volcanoes is that of a batch of magma volcanic fields. The terms monogenetic and volcano generated in a discrete melting event and with a field are to a degree controversial because their defined chemical composition (Fig. 3). Typically, defining parameters are imprecise and depend on monogenetic eruptive sequences show consistent the perspective of individual researchers. Both evolutionary development of geochemical trends terms have been recently reappraised (Ne´meth & which can be interpreted as the evolution of a single Kereszturi 2015; Can˜o´n-Tapia 2016). Here, we dis- batch of magma. Less commonly, a magma batch cuss the phenomenon of small-scale volcanism in can show little compositional variation. Some erup- terms of the linked concepts of monogenetic volca- tive sequences that are clearly monogenetic in noes, magma batches and volcano fields (Fig. 3). terms of their eruptive behaviour can be shown to An established terminology categorizes volcanic represent mixing of magmas of consanguineous, systems as monogenetic or polygenetic (Walker but diverse, origin such as documented from Udo 2000). These are useful concepts but suffer from Island, South Korea (Brenna et al. 2010). There are the question of where boundaries that are different also examples of single volcanic structures that have in differing areas of investigation may be drawn. clearly separated eruptive episodes which produced In volcanological terms, a monogenetic volcano is compositionally discrete batches of magma, as one which erupts only once within a defined time revealed from Rangitoto in the Auckland Volcanic period that is recognized as being one in which Field (Needham et al. 2011). These cases where there is no clear evidence of a temporal break in a more complex plumbing system can be demon- eruptive activity; the defined time period may be strated mark the transition between geochemi- weeks, months, years or, rarely, decades. Observed cally monogenetic volcanoes and geochemically Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Fig. 3. Small-volume volcanoes can be classified as monogenetic or polygenetic using two main criteria: (1) petrogenetic features or (2) volcanic architecture. Individually, small volcanoes that are spaced from each other by longer distances than their edifice ‘footprint’ can be recognized easily as small and simple volcanoes that are commonly fed from deep magma sources (a). Such volcanoes over time can form groups, cluster alignments (b) and, if lithospheric conditions permit, some shallower-sourced magmas can also be involved (c). Over time, such dispersed systems can form focused vent clusters (d) and even larger volume longer-lived edifices with multiple vents fed from shallow and deep sources (e). (a)–(e) can be looked at as a spectrum of evolution from a simple monogenetic volcanic field to a more mature field. Individual deep-sourced melts can reach the surface in locations where a complex polygenetic volcano occurs without too much interaction between their magmatic plumbing systems (f). Long-lived stratovolcanoes with multiple shallow magma-feeding systems can provide small-volume eruptions that are clearly shallow sourced but still form simple volcanic edifices which volcanologically would be considered as a monogenetic volcano (g). Long-lived shallow magma-fed systems such as major are commonly associated with a laterally extensive, but internally complicated, network of melt stored at shallow depths (coloured rectangles) similar to proposed models such as those associated with the Okataina Volcanic Complex at the (Smith et al. 2005, 2010; Shane 2015). Such systems can be pierced by deep-sourced melts that then erupt as small monogenetic volcanoes or can trigger silicic melts to erupt and form silicic rings and lava domes (h). In long-lived and large systems, amalgamated compound small-volume silicic volcanic compounds can form with a complex petrogenetic history (i). If lithospheric conditions are favourable, such systems can evolve to more complex and large-volume edifices, losing their dispersed nature both petrogenetically and volcanologically (j). polygenetic volcanoes, although, from a volcano- Further, while individual volcanoes in volcano logical perspective, both may be treated as mono- fields can be described as monogenetic in the sense genetic (Fig. 3). This is one of the difficulties of representing a temporally restricted period of encountered in applying the term monogenetic. eruptive activity, the systems of which they are a The distinction between monogenetic and poly- part may have been active for periods as long as genetic is essentially a variable within the spectrum those that develop polygenetic volcanoes (Condit of magmatic systems and one that will have a differ- et al. 1989; Connor & Conway 2000; Ne´meth ent definition according to the investigative method. 2010). As an example, the polygenetic volcano Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

Ruapehu in New Zealand evolved to its present state volcanic field (a ‘mature’ field) can, over time, pro- over 300 kyr (Gamble et al. 2003), which is equiv- duce more abundant larger volume, geochemically alent to the total time span of evolution of the Auck- more evolved compositions and architecturally land Volcanic Field (Lindsay et al. 2011) that more complex volcanoes. This has been demon- produced in the same time period at least 53 discrete strated in the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt volcanoes (Kereszturi et al. 2013). Monogenetic (Aguirre-Diaz et al. 2006; Arce et al. 2013), in the volcanic fields in some cases can be long lived western Arabian Cenozoic Volcanic Province and overarch entire geological epochs such as (Camp & Roobol 1989; Camp et al. 1991), in sev- those of the Central European Cenozoic Magmatic eral locations in eastern Africa (Franz et al. 1997, System (Ulrych et al. 2011) or the Western Arabian 1999) and in the Chaine des Puys in (Nowell Cenozoic Volcanic Province (Moufti et al. 2012). 2008; van Wyk de Vries et al. 2014). An important aspect of the debate is the rate of The edifice-building pyroclastic succession of magma supply, which can also be thought of in a single monogenetic volcano reflects the changes terms of the connection between source and surface of eruptive style during the course of an eruption. (Fig. 3). The volumes of individual magma batches Such successions are a key to establishing the timing that produce monogenetic volcanic cones are char- of eruptive events associated with the edifice (Fig. acteristically small (typically ,1km3, commonly 3). Especially in larger volume volcanoes, these ,0.1 km3). The compositional features exhibited pyroclastic successions are the subject of debates by monogenetic magma batches commonly show about the monogenetic v. polygenetic origin of the features that relate to source or near-source pro- edifice (McKnight & Williams 1997; Sheth 2014). cesses and these indicate rapid rise rates from source Normally, in a sensu stricto monogenetic volcano, to surface. Because of their small volumes, monoge- its pyroclastic succession shows a continuous netic magma batches do not retain a connection to sequence of layers with no evidence to sup- their source and essentially represent ‘bubbles’ of port significant breaks between pyroclastic beds rising magma. If they stall in the they become other than normal changes in pyroclastic density un-eruptible with cooling and crystallization. current movement, wind-drifted tephra accumula- Recent studies have also indicated that the role of tion or erosional surfaces associated with syndeposi- magmas that do not reach the surface and represent tional remobilization of pyroclasts due to some ‘failed eruptions’ might be important, even in the other non-volcanic sedimentary processes (e.g. sud- case of small-volume magmatism (Gudmundsson den mass movement on the wet flank of a growing 2003; Ne´meth & Martin 2007; Taisne et al. 2011; tephra ring causing syn-eruptive formation) Geshi et al. 2012; Kiyosugi et al. 2012; Friese (White 1991; Manville et al. 2009). In either way, et al. 2013; Le Corvec et al. 2013a, b; Can˜o´n-Tapia such pyroclastic successions show a consistent 2014; Re et al. 2015). Growing evidence has also sequence of pyroclastic beds associated purely shown that the shallow plumbing system of small- with the fluctuation of the relative role of the inter- volume volcanoes commonly defined as monoge- nal v. external parameters (Fig. 4). In this context, netic is complex, and magmas exit through an internal parameters are those that are directly asso- upper conduit linked to various and geometrically ciated with the physicochemical nature (e.g. compo- complicated networks of pathways (Valentine & sition, volatile content, its rise speed and rate, and Krogh 2006; Valentine et al. 2007, 2011; Geshi its changes or variations) of the rising magma, et al. 2011; Hintz & Valentine 2012). Such complex while external parameters are those that can affect plumbing scenarios add complexity to the chemical the magma fragmentation and, hence, the eruption and architectural evolution of the volcano, even if style and the resulting pyroclastic eruptive products they are small in volume (Geshi 2000, 2001). Stud- (most commonly associated with the availability ies of magma-flow movement within the growing of external water of any type and its ability to be small-volume edifice suggest that magma can available in various timescales). Commonly, there behave unexpectedly prior to exiting through a vent, is a trend from a typical phreatomagmatic-frag- leading to the development of complex conduit– mentation-dominated eruption style towards more crater networks (Petronis et al. 2013; Delcamp magmatic-fragmentation-dominated successions in et al. 2014). the course of the eruption of small-volume volca- Over time, a volcanic system that is typically noes (Lorenz 1987; White 1991), providing late- composed of volcanoes that fulfill the monogenetic stage ‘magmatic cap’ (Fig. 5a), intra-crater scoria plumbing criteria and which shows a high magma cone growth in the initial /tuff ring crater production rate can gradually produce composition- (Fig. 5b) or gradually filling the maar/tuff ring cra- ally more evolved magmas that feed and build ters by lava flows (Fig. 5c). The interplay between architecturally more complex volcanoes that share the internal and external forces acting upon the similarities to polygenetic volcanoes (Fig. 3). eruption style of the growing small-volume vol- There are numerous examples where a long-lived cano commonly form eruptive sequences showing Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Fig. 4. External v. internal controlling parameters act as ‘competing’ forces to influence magma fragmentation and, hence, the overall architecture of the growing small-volume volcano. On the x-axis of this conceptual diagram, increasing magma volume is shown from right to left and is the fundamental internal force driving volcanic eruptions. On the y-axis, the external forces that influence the magma fragmentation and, hence, the eruption style are marked as the increasing availability (volume) of water to the magmatic system. The external forces can be expressed as a function of external water available, the storage capacity of the aquifers, the hydraulic conductivity, permeability and the surface water availability (a function of climatic conditions). The external forces are heavily dependent on the elevation of the landscape that the magma encounters as higher ground normally has deeper aquifers and/or less potential to capture surface runoff water. In the diagram, two lines separate magmatic-dominated volcanoes (M), mixed-type volcanoes (MIX) and phreatomagmatic-dominated volcanoes (PH). Common types of volcanoes can be distinguished such as: (1) scoria and spatter cones of any size; (2) scoria cones with a thin initial phreatomagmatic base; (3) phreatomagmatic volcanic with a thin magmatic cap/infill; (4) well-developed phreatomagmatic landform with a magmatic infill; (5) well-developed phreatomagmatic landform overgrown by a magmatic landform; (6) large well-developed phreatomagmatic landform with a magmatic intra-crater cone; and (7) various sizes of phreatomagmatic landforms. Note that the red arrows represent a shift of the separating lines of volcano types in the case of high magma flux (mfhigh); and orange arrows show the shift of the separating lines of volcano types in the case of low magma flux (mflow).

systematic and/or random variations of tephra units Most commonly in a small-volume volcanic edi- associated with the more dominant magma frag- fice, the pyroclastic succession shows few distinct mentation styles (Fig. 6). If the eruption takes horizons commonly marked by ballistic bomb and place as a result of a single eruption of a single block layers. These layers can be traced over large magma batch, the pyroclastic successions will areas, and seem to be associated with a volcanic show chemical variation patterns associated with explosive event that was dispersed equally in either fractionation processes in the tapping magma every direction within a very narrow time period column en route to the surface or they will show rel- and represent materials that are derived from con- ative compositional homogeneity: such a simple duit walls and/or from a degassed magma stalled monogenetic volcanic sequence is probably the in the upper conduit or crater. These coarse-grained less common scenario (McGee & Smith 2016). horizons are typically associated with random Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

Fig. 5. A typical eruption sequence of a small-volume basaltic volcano (Motukorea/Browns Island, ) (a) that shows some variation of magma rise (juvenile pyroclast volume changes) and the effect of the external water that influences the eruption style (accidental lithic contents). The section is dominated by an initial phreatomagmatic sequence (ph) interbedded with a magmatic-fragmentation-dominated unit (m). In the section, ballistic bombs of accidental lithic fragments caused impact sags (arrows). The entire section is capped by a magmatic capping unit dominated by scoriaceous successions (mc). In addition, random or systematic changes in the upper conduit can trigger vent-clearing events that are commonly associated with some chemical changes as a reflection of the arrival of a new melt batch below (a). A common trend in a small-volume volcanic eruption that finishes with the development of an intra-crater scoria cone (b), such as in Meke Go¨lu¨ (Meke Lake) in Anatolia’s Karapinar Volcanic Field, or lava spatter cone growth with intra-crater lava infill, such as La Bren˜a maar in the Durango Volcanic Field in Mexico (c). Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Fig. 6. Small-volume cones can be heavily influenced by phreatomagmatism such as the Ohakune cone complex near Ruapehu New Zealand. Lighter coloured beds have a strong phreatomagmatic influence, while darker beds are dominated by lava spatters; many clasts have chilled rims, indicating that lava fountaining took place through a wet environment. Numbers represents individual units identified by Ko´sik et al. (2016). conduit collapse events but they also can be associ- relative influence of external parameters on the ated with a systematic movement of the explosion resulting volcanic edifice structure and their pyro- locus along a fissure (Sohn & Chough 1989; clastic succession can be characteristic (Fig. 7). White & Ross 2011; Graettinger et al. 2015). In For larger magma volumes, the effect can be diffi- either way, the presence of such horizons can reflect cult to identify as later eruptive products may conduit dynamic processes along and across the completely cover any sign of earlier events (Fig. 7). feeding dyke involved in the eruption (Ross & White 2006; Barnett et al. 2011; Geshi & Oikawa 2014). Commonly, such horizons can also be associ- Volcano fields ated with a slight change in the chemical com- positions of the juvenile pyroclasts above such a The low rates of magma production that to horizon, reflecting the arrival of a new magma the development of volcano fields rather than single batch that triggered the excavation (Brenna et al. large cones may be due to tectonic setting (Hase- 2011, 2015). In such cases, the initial explosion naka & Carmichael 1985; Takada 1994), but this horizons can contain evidence of syn- is a complex question. Some volcano fields are eruptive , mud draping or clast rearrange- found in purely subduction-related, extensional or ment on the millimetre–decimetre scale, or even intraplate settings worldwide (Connor & Conway erosion events, as in falls of condensed water onto 2000; Petrone et al. 2003), while others are found the growing edifice flanks. in extensional settings near to active arcs, such as Because feeding dykes are commonly blade-like in the Cascades of the western USA (Leeman & in form and follow fissures (as demonstrated by the Bonnichsen 2005; Leeman et al. 2005; Muffler presence of a row of craters in many settings), the et al. 2011), or in intraplate settings that are gently lithological and, hence, the hydrogeological varia- rifting due to the occurrence of plume-like upwell- tions along a fissure (over length scales of hundreds ing, such as in the Central European Volcanic Prov- of metres) can cause significant lateral variations of ince (Haase & Renno 2008). Volcanic fields can also eruption style and strikingly different eruptive prod- be found in association with large stratovolcanoes, ucts along the fissure, which provides an ‘impres- as in southern Chile (Lopez-Escobar et al. 1995; sion’ that the growing volcanic edifice is complex Cembrano & Lara 2009), across (Carn and has departed from a sensu stricto ‘monogenetic’ 2000), Changbaishan in NE China (Liu et al. 2009) nature (Fig. 6). In small magmatic volumes, the andMexico(Siebeet al. 2004; Schaaf et al. 2005; Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

Fig. 7. Initial phreatomagmatic layers in a very-small-volume scoria cone in the AD 641 Al Madinah eruption in Saudi Arabia as a sign of initial favourable conditions of external water to influence the intruding magma tip during the onset of the eruption.

Sieron et al. 2014), suggesting complex underlying 2004; Conrad et al. 2011; Kereszturi & Ne´meth plumbing systems. Large volcanic islands such as 2012a; Can˜o´n-Tapia 2016). As volcanic fields are Hawaii (Wood 1980), (Savaii and Upolu) always evolving and their location follows geotec- (Ne´meth & Cronin 2009b), Miyakejima (Japan), tonic changes (Conrad et al. 2011), probably the Ambae (Vanuatu) (Ne´meth & Cronin 2009a), best way to show their geographical location is to (Vanuatu) (Ne´meth & Cronin 2011) or select time slices, such as the younger than Pliocene (Kereszturi et al. 2012) are commonly ages shown on the set of figures in Figure 1. associated with rift-aligned zones of small-volume In other more complex systems, the presence of a volcanoes grown over the basal lava shields. There range of basaltic compositions and of intermediate are large variations in fundamental parameters and compositions (e.g. , , such as the size of the area covered by the field, ) is evidence of compositional modifica- the number of individual volcanoes, and their size tion during transit to the surface. and chemical composition. Delineating a volcanic The tectonic setting, as well as the local or field can be an easy task using statistical methods regional stress field, appear to be important factors to define the time and spatial distribution of vents in the genesis and form of some volcanic fields within a field; however, overlapping, amalgamated (Le Corvec et al. 2013a), and in fact may govern or long-lived volcanic fields can cause difficulties whether polygenetic or monogenetic structures are when describing their areal distribution (Condit formed (Takada 1994; Bucchi et al. 2015). The posi- et al. 1989; Connor 1990; Bishop 2007; von Veh tion of the in Mexico is thought to &Ne´meth 2009; Bohnenstiehl et al. 2012; Howell cause the shift from polygenetic to monogenetic et al. 2012; Di Traglia et al. 2014; Runge et al. volcanism from north to south (Connor 1987). The 2015). Many fields have unique characteristics, evolution of some volcanic fields has been linked such as the existence of polygenetic centres preced- to tectonic plate movement, such as in the San Fran- ing the formation of a dispersed network of mono- cisco Volcanic Field (Arizona) where volcanism is genetic centres, for instance those at Higashi-Izu thought to migrate with the westwards movement in Japan (Hasebe et al. 2001), or the presence of the (Tanaka et al. 1986). of flood basalt eruptions preceding the formation In other cases, small-volume dispersed volcanism of the monogenetic centres in (Baker et al. shows random distribution with no obvious trend 1997). There are some attempts to visualize the spa- associated with inferred plate motions. However, tial distribution of volcanic fields: however, such their occurrence is more likely to be associated attempts always run into difficulty when choos- with sudden changes in the ‘topography’ of the lith- ing the right selection criteria and the right scale osphere asthenosphere boundary, as has been dem- to show volcanic fields (Can˜o´n-Tapia & Walker onstrated from the Pannonian Basin in central Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Europe (Harangi et al. 2015). Tectonic setting and craters) on widely varying spatial and temporal structure has also been implicated as the cause of scales. The range of chemical compositions repre- small-volume magmatism in some volcanic fields, sented in these fields is most commonly in the basal- such as the edge-driven convection model of Demi- tic spectrum – nephelinite––alkali basalt– djuk et al. (2007) for the Newer Volcanic Province tholeiite (e.g. the volcanic fields) (Duda & (SE Australia) where a lithospheric step is thought Schmincke 1978; Schmincke et al. 1983; Ali et al. to cause the upwelling required to stimulate melting. 2013; McGee & Smith 2016), rarely highly alkaline A similar idea to this is invoked for the Zuni- (e.g. along East Africa: the Meidob Hills and the Bandera Volcanic Field of , where Bayda Volcanic Field) (Rosenthal et al. 2009) and changes in lithospheric thickness beneath the field carbonatitic compositions (e.g. the Calatrava Volca- are linked to changes in the melting processes nic Field) (Kurszlaukis & Lorenz 1997; Bailey et al. (Peters et al. 2008). On a local scale, the distribution 2005; Stoppa & Schiazza 2013; Campeny et al. of volcanic cones within a field can reflect the orien- 2014), and, in subduction-related fields, basaltic tation of faults (Muffler et al. 2011). (Maro & Caffe 2016a; Rasoazanamparany The geochemical character of monogenetic et al. 2016). Less commonly evolved compositions volcano fields is in part related to their specific tec- in the phonolite–trachyte– compositional tonic setting, and includes intraplate (e.g. eastern range occur, usually within spatially limited parts Australia, western and northern of volcano fields, at later stages in their evolution New Zealand), extension (e.g. central Europe and and where thicker crust is present, such as those Arabia) and subduction-associated (e.g. Mexico, fields in the (Fig. 8a) (Camp & USA, Argentina) settings. Important underlying fac- Roobol 1989; Camp et al. 1991). Evolved silicic tors for the development of monogenetic volcanic compositions are also found independently of systems are small magma volumes, episodic erup- basaltic volcano fields in some continental settings. tion of discrete magma batches and a crustal envi- Typically evolved silicic compositions occur as ronment that allows the passage and escape of dome complexes or pyroclastic cones, such as those small magma volumes through the crust. across Mexico or central Anatolia (Fig. 8b, c) (Riggs Volcanic fields can form in a range of surface & Carrasco-Nu´n˜ez 2004; Zimmer et al. 2010; areas from few tens of square kilometres to over Carrasco-Nu´n˜ez et al. 2012; Aydin et al. 2014). 1000 km2 area, within which there may be a few There are very few systematic studies which to more than a hundred volcanoes (Connor & Con- connect the magmatic plumbing system of silicic way 2000). The vent distribution in a dispersed vol- magmas and their volcanic architecture in a mono- canic field has been a common subject of studies genetic context (Brenna et al. 2012b; Ridolfi et al. intended to establish a temporal–spatial vent evolu- 2016). This is partially because small and short- tion concept within a single volcanic field (Le Cor- lived silicic volcanoes are commonly associated vec et al. 2013b). There are volcanic fields in which with large and long-lived volcanic systems, and vents show a marked alignment normally associated commonly represent a less important fraction of with faults such as the Chaine des Puys in France the total system. This concept, however, needs (Boivin & Thouret 2014; Lutz 2014). The vent some revision as small monogenetic silicic volca- alignments can, hence, reflect older underlying noes are more common and their eruption occur- structural elements that might have been rejuve- rence more frequent than is generally appreciated, nated in the course of the volcanism, as argued for and they can play an important role in the overall many cases in vent distributions over old continental volcanic hazard scape in large and complex volcanic lithospheric regions (Mazzarini & D’Orazio 2003). systems. Small silicic volcanoes that form lava There are volcanic fields where vents instead form domes and/or small explosion craters ( or clusters, and it has been suggested that they repre- just small silicic edifices) are common features in sent the surface expressions of narrow ‘mantle fin- association with large networks, such as gers’ (Tamura et al. 2009), and there are volcanic those of the Taupo Volcanic Zone in New Zealand fields where vents show random distribution and (Houghton et al. 1991; Cole et al. 2010, 2014). where any link to structural elements is difficult to Among these small volcanoes, some are very establish (Condit et al. 1989). young ones and show clear evidence of short erup- tion durations and are well below the 1 km3 eruptive volume (such as the 14 kyr-old Puketerata tuff ring Monogenetic volcanism in non-basaltic and dome near Taupo in New Zealand: Fig. 8d) settings commonly used as a proxy to argue for their mono- genetic nature (Brooker et al. 1993; Stevenson The typical expression of monogenetic magmatism et al. 1994; Druitt et al. 1995; Kazanci et al. 1995; is the development of fields of small volcanoes Bursik et al. 2014; Dennen et al. 2014; Moufti & (pyroclastic cones, maars, lava domes or explosion Ne´meth 2014). Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

Fig. 8. Non-basaltic monogenetic volcanoes: (a) trachytic (Dabaal Al Shamali) next to a small explosion crater surrounded by a thin tephra ring (Gura 1) from the Harrat Rahat in Saudi Arabia; (b) rhyolitic/rhyodacitic lava dome field near the Erciyes volcano; (c) rhyolitic/rhyodacitic lava dome in a maar/tuff ring of Acigo¨lin Cappadocia, Turkey; and (d) the 14 kyr-old Puketerata rhyodacitic tuff ring and lava dome.

There are at least two major groups of non- to be fed from the same major magmatic sources basaltic volcanoes that can be viewed as monoge- associated with the main complex and polygenetic netic: (1) volcanoes that erupt in continental settings volcanic network. Those volcanoes that clearly through thick , such as those in show an individual feeding network that taps the western Arabia (Camp et al. 1991); and (2) volca- deeper zones of a magmatic system seem to be asso- noes that, in some degree, show an association ciated with volcanic fields that were active over a with a shallow magma source feeding large-volume, long time, allowing the capture of magma in the commonly caldera volcanism, such as the Long thick crust and its evolution to more silicic compo- Valley Caldera (Hildreth 2004) (Fig. 6). A typical sitions. Here, we suggest that in spite of the different scenario for this later group of small volcanoes are magmatic plumbing system associated with these those that are fed by a small-volume melts released volcanoes, the result on the surface can be very sim- between major caldera-forming events and inferred ilar in terms of their volcanic architecture. The Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION separation of these volcanoes from other volcanoes were produced in an environment where a mini- with long-lived and stabile feeding systems is mal amount of external water (surface or fracture important not only from a volcanic hazard perspec- stored) was available, a thin (metre scale as a tive in young volcanic regions, but also from min- maximum) phreatomagmatic pyroclastic deposit eral exploration aspects in older settings where the always appeared (Murcia et al. 2015) (Fig. 7). Sim- edifices might be largely removed due to erosion ilarly, if the drops, a short-lived and there is access to their upper conduit zones com- phreatomagmatic blast can produce a thin pyro- monly associated with mineralization. The clastic deposit indicating that the eruption style architecture of such exposed plumbing systems of has changed due to changes in the magma rise non-basaltic monogenetic volcanism is the key to rate and the access of external water to the rising understanding the overall magma-release processes magma. These processes can leave a dominant tex- through individual magma-feeding networks that tural feature in the pyroclastic succession that may operate under small supply volume conditions. This give an impression of major changes in the erup- situation is clearly different from those systems that tion; however, these changes were caused only by have a driving mechanism associated with a larger the subtle interaction between the external and inter- volume magma supply, and a broader and more nal controlling parameters of the eruption. interconnected plumbing network that can retain Changes in the magma rise rate, magma volume heat long enough to generate heat to drive a geother- and environmental conditions causes changes in mal mineralization system. eruption style, leading to cyclical activity patterns. Such trends have recently been documented in a number of volcanic fields (Martin & Ne´meth Eruption style variation: the ‘competition’ 2005; van Otterloo et al. 2013; Agustin-Flores between the magmatic system and the et al. 2014, 2015). For example, in the Auckland environment Volcanic Field in New Zealand, magma volumes vary by orders of magnitude (0.01–1 km2) and The style of volcanic eruptions in small-volume there are widely variable conditions of water avail- monogenetic volcanic fields is strongly dependent ability, and as a result there is a wide range of erup- on the relative influence of internal magmatic (e.g. tion styles in contrast to volcano fields which occur magmatic , chemical composition and vis- in relatively dry conditions or where magma vol- cosity) and environmental factors (e.g. the presence umes are larger (Kereszturi et al. 2014). Low of external water, host sediment physical con- magma volumes and the availability of near-surface ditions and fractures) (Ne´meth 2010; Ne´meth & water in the Auckland Volcanic Field have played Kereszturi 2015). Essentially, this can be expressed a major part in determining eruption styles, and as as a ‘competition’ between the magmatic system a consequence about 75% of the volcanic cones and the near-surface environment encountered by were initiated by a significant explosive phreato- the rising magma (Fig. 4). In most cases, the vol- magmatic eruptive phase (Kereszturi et al. 2014). umes of magma batches that feed monogenetic vol- Recent studies imply that the relative influence of canoes are well below 1 km3 (closer to 0.01 km3), the magma system and environmental factors can and the balance between magmatic and environ- be calculated and integrated into a relatively simple mental factors can be very sensitive (Kereszturi numerical model that can be viewed as the eruption et al. 2013, 2014). style formula of this specific field (Kereszturi In a very simplified model, if magmatic et al. 2017); similar expressions can be derived for volumes are larger (i.e. increasing heat and potential other monogenetic magmatic systems. energy ‘stored’ in the rising magma), the system The environmental influence on a monogenetic can overwhelm the external environment to produce volcanic eruption can fundamentally change the a dominantly magmatic eruption, and typically potential volcanic hazard from a relatively moderate Hawaiian– styles constructing style that can require a particu- spatter and scoria cones (Kereszturi & Ne´meth lar type of response to a more violent, phreatomag- 2012a; Kereszturi et al. 2014). For smaller magma matic style that requires a quite different response volumes, and potentially lower magmatic flux and (Lorenz 2007; Ne´meth et al. 2012). therefore eruption rates, external environmental fac- The interplay between the internal v. external tors will dominate the course of the volcanic erup- parameters that influence the eruption style of small- tions to produce styles volume volcanoes can also vary over longer time and associated pyroclastic deposits (Kereszturi periods. Typical volcanic fields with more than a et al. 2014). The systematic nature of these pro- dozen volcanic edifices commonly formed over cesses is commonly observed in the basal pyro- tens of thousands to millions of years, such as the clastic succession of monogenetic cones (Fig. 5a). Wudalianchi in NE China which has 14 volcanoes In the initial pyroclastic succession of cones that in the past 2.1 myr (Gao et al. 2013). However, Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH there are also volcanic fields that formed over tens of the style of volcanism: however, so far, systematic millions of years but in these there are generally studies have not been performed in this regard. clearly defined periods of eruptive activity: for example, many of the mature volcanic fields in the Arabian Peninsula (Camp & Roobol 1992; Moufti Volcanosedimentary response and et al. 2012) or in Australia (Boyce 2013). preservation potential The consequences of a long lifespan of a monogenetic volcanic field is that the eruption styles Monogenetic volcanic fields are composed of indi- preserved in the geological record can carry impor- vidual small-volume volcanic edifices, each with a tant information on the environmental conditions relatively simple upper conduit–crater–vent sys- that prevailed during the time frame of the field. Cli- tem, that are normally spaced from each other at dis- mate changes can provoke changes in the surface tances longer than their edifice base diameter. The and subsurface hydrogeology of a region, and this small volume of magma involved and the variable is one of the single most important external factors external conditions influence the style of eruption that can influence the eruptions style. For example, and determine the variety of associated eruptive this has been demonstrated in the Bakony–Balaton deposits. Where magma volumes are low and envi- Highland Volcanic Field in Hungary, a basaltic ronmental conditions wet, phreatomagmatic erup- intraplate field that produced at least 35 volcanic tion styles may prevail over the entire duration of edifices over a nearly 6 myr time period between the growth of a single volcano. Such explosive erup- 8 and 2.3 Ma (Wijbrans et al. 2007); volcanoes tions are expected to produce tephra deposits dominated by phreatomagmatism are clearly more extending over several tens of kilometres from abundant at a time when palaeoclimatic data indi- their source. In spite of the low magma volume, cate more humid and wet periods (Kereszturi et al. such volcanoes can produce reasonable-sized volca- 2011). Similar trends have also been suggested noes because of the relatively large volume of coun- from the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt (Siebe try that is ‘recycled’ as non-volcanic pyroclasts 1986) and from the Arabian Peninsula (Moufti (Ne´meth et al. 2012). In such environmentally con- et al. 2015). While these ideas are logical, so far trolled eruptions, the ‘footprint’ of each cone is rel- no systematic studies have been carried out in atively large and tephra deposits relatively extensive other fields with longer time spans. (Ne´meth et al. 2012). While these tephra blankets Similarly several studies have demonstrated a are normally thin and their preservation potential potential link between wet periods characterized by low, the volcanic field will be dominated by large saturated subsurface aquifer conditions and more numbers of depressions (craters) that then can act environmentally dominated eruption styles (Siebe & as small sedimentary basins to ‘harvest’ ash from Salinas 2014; Kshirsagar et al. 2015, 2016). Some other sources (White 1991). Such volcanic fields workers have suggested the influence of large plu- can quickly lose their volcanic appearance due to vial or inland lakes where basaltic magma rise is vegetation cover and extensive erosion of the rela- ongoing over millions of years. Such a situation tively small volcanic edifices. If a volcanic field is has been demonstrated along the western Snake active over a long time and the magma production River, where shallow subaqueous volcanoes formed rate large, the sedimentary contribution to the terres- along the margins of a large inland lake (Godchaux trial record can be significant and may be preserved & Bonnichsen 2002). With a reduction in the over a longer time as part of the continental sedi- surface area of the lake, the younger Surtseyan mentary successions (Manville et al. 2009; Martin- volcanoes tend to be confined more towards the Serrano et al. 2009). present-day axis of the modern western Snake The preservation potential of the volcanic erup- River (Godchaux et al. 1992; Brand & White tive products of phreatomagmatic-dominated volca- 2007). Palaeolake-level changes and their influence nic fields is unknown in the long term. While craters on the eruption styles of rising magma has also be are excellent sites to host tephra records, commonly recorded along Lake Kivu, where the location of the only record of the existence of such volcanic Surtseyan and phreatomagmatic volcanoes seems fields in the geological past is the exposed diatreme to correlate well with the changing location of associated with maar volcanoes. The information the palaeoshoreline of the lake (Capaccioni et al. that can be gained from diatremes is, however, 2003; Ross et al. 2014, 2015). Similar examples restricted to the understanding of the individual vol- have been reported from Anatolia (Keller 1975) cano and cannot be used for correlative purposes to and in several intra- basins in the Basin refine the eruption history of the volcanic field as a and Range region of the western USA (White 1990, whole (White & Ross 2011). In addition, because 1996). It is very likely that the influence of large diatremes are pyroclast-accumulation zones where lacustrine basin evolutions in Central Asia, North individual explosive events excavated and recycled Africa and across the Arabian Peninsula influenced pyroclasts, it is a significant challenge to establish Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION the original eruptive volume of the volcano and, Conclusion hence, establish its fundamentally monogenetic origin (White & Ross 2011). This problem has The concept of monogenetic and polygenetic volca- recently been demonstrated through careful exami- noes is usefully applied to the spectrum of volcanic nation of some -bearing diatremes and systems from small to large. Monogenetic volca- other mafic diatremes (Kurszlaukis & Fulop 2013; noes are defined by small magma volumes, short Fulop & Kurszlaukis 2014). In eastern Germany, eruptive periods and dispersed plumbing, although some diatremes recorded eruptive products found the magmatic systems to which they belong may to be millions of years apart, apparently hosted in be long lived. The characteristic expression of the same narrow and well-defined pipe-like fea- monogenetic volcanic systems is as fields of small tures normally interpreted to be the result of a single volcanic cones. monogenetic volcanic eruption under wet – envi- An important feature of basaltic monogenetic ronmentally controlled – conditions (Suhr & Goth volcanic systems is that observed patterns of com- 2009; Buechner et al. 2015). A similar scenario positional variation are commonly linked to differ- has also been recorded in several kimberlite pipes, entiation processes that have occurred at high where clear geochemical, age and textural evidence pressures close to their sources or to differential par- showed that a single pipe can host multiple ‘zones’ tial melting in their mantle sources. This illustrates formed in separate events in a kind of a compound the close link between magma sources and the erup- monogenetic scenario (Kurszlaukis & Barnett tion of magma at the Earth’s surface, which points to 2003; Barnett 2008). It seems that, for some reason, rapid rise rates and little interaction with the rocks these pipes functioned as volcanic conduits for suc- through which the magma rises – an important dis- cessive monogenetic eruptive events separated by tinction from polygenetic systems. long time periods, commonly reaching the range There is a clear separation of monogenetic sys- of the total lifespan of the entire volcanic field tems from the basalt-dominated volcano fields they belong to. which are linked to deep hot mantle sources and It appears that there are a large number of fields where there are significant amounts of phreatomagmatic-dominant monogenetic volcanic evolved compositions that are related to processes fields, especially in coastal areas, large intra- operating at crustal depths. Small-volume volcanoes continental lacustrine basins or just in well-drained with a significant proportion of evolved composi- areas with a good groundwater network. Although tions are related to systems which have a high such conditions favour phreatomagmatism in the magma supply rate where magmas have stalled evolution of the volcanic field, it is rare that there within the crust and fractionation processes have is no variation in the eruption style from volcano led to the evolved compositions. These volcanoes to volcano across the field. If the volcanic field represent a transition towards the complex edifices operates with elevated magma output rates and that characterize polygenetic volcanic systems. potentially higher magma flux rates, most of the vol- An important concept that links the nature of the canoes of the field, even if they have dominantly magmatic system to the environment in which mag- phreatomagmatic early phases, reach purely mag- mas erupt at the Earth’s surface is one of a compe- matic explosive and/or effusive conditions in their tition between the rising magma and the nature of later stages. such as has been demonstrated from the eruptive environment. Where the system domi- the Auckland Volcanic Field in New Zealand (Ker- nates, magmatic eruption styles (Hawaiian, Strom- eszturi et al. 2014). bolian, effusive) create scoria cones and lava flows Volcanic fields where the eruptions are domi- in what can be termed ‘dry’ conditions. In contrast, nated by magmatic (dry) conditions are composed where the environment dominates and the availabil- of numerous scoria and spatter cones, and lava ity of water profoundly influences the behaviour flows and fields. The pyroclast-preservation poten- of erupting magma, eruption styles are dominated tial of such fields can be long in arid conditions; by phreatomagmatism, and the production of tuff however, in humid climates, such cones can vanish cones, tuff rings and maars. over tens of thousands of years. It is inferred that Small-scale magmatic systems, commonly ex- degradation of scoria cones follows a regular pat- pressed at the surface of the Earth, represent the tern: hence, such cones can be used for relative rise of small-volume batches of magma into spa- age dating (Wood 1980; Fornaciai et al. 2012). tially restricted domains. Although individual However, recent studies demonstrated that such magma batches are small, this is the most wide- methods need to be treated carefully as the syn- spread form of volcanism on Earth. The mono- eruptive processes might have a larger impact on genetic volcanoes which are a feature of such the cone architecture and their degradation than it systems provide a unique window into processes is commonly thought (Kereszturi et al. 2012; Ker- in the upper mantle that give rise to magmas. Further eszturi & Ne´meth 2012b). understanding their behaviour underpins hazard Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH scenarios where human activities impinge on their An important aspect of the study of monogenetic existence. volcanic systems has been the way that an under- standing of their behaviour has been built on detailed studies of systems in widely dispersed A snapshot of current advances in research localities and in a wide variety of geological and on monogenetic volcanism tectonic environments. Much of this volume has been devoted to presenting the current perspective Small-scale volcanic systems expressed at the of volcanism in different parts of the world. Cas Earth’s surface as fields of small volcanoes are et al. (2016) and Murcia et al. (2016) describe the most widespread form of volcanic activity on regional-scale studies of the western Victorian the planet. Because individual volcanoes in these (Australia) province and the northern part of Harrat fields are typically formed during a temporally Rahat in Saudi Arabia. Fulop & Kurszlaukis restricted period of time, the term monogenetic (2016) present the results of a study of a kimberlite has become a useful descriptor for this type of vol- pipe in , highlighting the complexity of a canism, although it is not one that is universally kimberlite pipe reflecting the potential rejuvena- accepted. Monogenetic volcanism has received a tion of volcanism in the exact same location and lot of attention in recent years, partly because the producing texturally and chemically complex diat- small scale of their associated magmatic systems remes. There follows chapters on several small- enables the preservation of unique petrological fea- scale monogenetic fields in Mexico (Alvarez et al. tures and provides a ‘window’ into the processes 2017a, b; Aranda-Go´mez et al. 2016; Saucedo that produce their magmas, because the details of et al. 2017), Argentina (Ba´ez et al. 2016; Maro & their volcanic processes are readily interpreted and Caffe 2016b) and Colombia (Borrero et al. 2016). also because, despite their small scale, there is a These serve as an illustration of the importance of realization that many communities worldwide are individual studies in different settings from around vulnerable to the effects of future volcanic activity. the world. This Special Publication has arisen from the activities and discussions at workshops and confer- This paper is result of discussions with many colleagues ences during recent years, including the Interna- across the globe. Discussion sessions during the past and tional Maar Conferences, the commemorative recent International Maar conferences were particularly 250 year anniversary on the Jorullo scoria cone stimulating. Many aspects of the researches resulted in eruption, various thematic sessions on monogenetic this review were funded by various agencies such as the volcanism offered in major volcanological con- Massey University Research Funds (2016), and New Zealand National Hazard Platform Project. Reviewers’ gresses such as the International Association of comments by Xavier Bolos and Philip T. Leat were greatly Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior appreciated. Scientific Assembly, the General Assemblies of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, the Geomorphological World Congresses, the References American Geophysical Union meetings, and several regional workshops. This volume is not intended as Aguirre-Diaz, G.J., Jaimes-Viera, M.D.C. & a comprehensive volume on the nature of monoge- Nieto-Obregon, J. 2006. The Valle de Bravo volcanic netic volcanism but, rather, is a snapshot of the cur- field: geology and geomorphometric parameters of rent state of research into this important type of a monogenetic field at the front of the volcanic activity. The diverse nature of research Mexican volcanic belt. In: Siebe, C., Macias, J.L. & Aguirre-Diaz into monogenetic volcanism during the past decade, , G.J. (eds) Neogene–Quarternary Continental Margin Volcanism: A Perspective from together with the far-reaching outcomes that have Me´xico. Geological Society of America, Special resulted, demonstrates that a unified definition and Papers, 402, 139–154. understanding of the processes that drive monoge- Agustin-Flores, J., Ne´meth, K., Cronin, S.J., Lind- netic volcanism is not yet available. say, J.M., Kereszturi, G., Brand, B.D. & Smith, In this introductory chapter we have reviewed I.E.M. 2014. Phreatomagmatic eruptions through the current state of understanding of the chemistry unconsolidated coastal plain sequences, Maungatake- and volcanology of monogenetic volcanic fields. take, Auckland Volcanic Field (New Zealand). Jour- The following chapters deal mainly with the volca- nal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 276, nological aspects of monogenetic volcanism, the 46–63. Agustin-Flores, J., Ne´meth, K., Cronin, S.J., Lindsay, way that volcanic cones grow through various erup- J.M. & Kereszturi, G. 2015. Shallow-seated explo- tive processes (Bemis & Ferencz 2017; Lorenz sions in the construction of the Motukorea tuff ring et al. 2016) and the relationships that these have to (Auckland, New Zealand): evidence from lithic and the immediate underlying conduit (Kurszlaukis & sedimentary characteristics. Journal of Volcanology Lorenz 2016). and Geothermal Research, 304, 272–286. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Albarede, F., Luais,B.et al. 1997. The geochemical Barnett, W.P., Kurszlaukis, S., .&Tait,M Dirks,P. regimes of volcano (Reunion) 2011. Kimberlite wall-rock fragmentation processes: during the last 530 000 years. Journal of Petrology, venetia K08 pipe development. Bulletin of Volcanol- 38, 171–201. ogy, 73, 941–958. Ali, S., Ntaflos,T.&Upton, B.G.J. 2013. Petrogenesis Bemis,K.&Ferencz, M. 2017. Morphometric analysis of and mantle source characteristics of Quaternary alka- scoria cones: the potential for inferring process from line mafic lavas in the western Carpathian–Pannonian shape. In: Ne´meth, K., Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G., Ara- Region, Styria, Austria. Chemical Geology, 337, nda-Go´mez, J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. (eds) Monogenetic 99–113. Volcanism. Geological Society, London, Special Publi- Alvarez, R., Corbo Camargo,F.&Yutsis, V.V. 2017a. cations, 446. First published online January 17, 2017, Geophysical modelling of Isla Isabel: a volcanic https://doi.org/10.1144/SP446.9 island on the Mexican continental margin. In: Ne´m- Bishop, M. 2007. Point pattern analysis of eruption points eth, K., Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G., Aranda-Go´mez, for the Mount Gambier volcanic sub-province: a quan- J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. (eds) Monogenetic Volcanism. titative geographical approach to the understanding of Geological Society, London, Special Publications, volcano distribution. Area, 39, 230–241. 446. First published online March 3, 2017, https:// Blaikie,T.N.,van Otterloo,J.,Ailleres,L.,Betts, doi.org/10.1144/SP446.13 P.G. & Cas, R.A.F. 2015. The erupted volumes of Alvarez,R.,Corbo Camargo,F.,Yutsis,V.V.&Arzate, tephra from maar volcanoes and estimates of their VEI J.A. 2017b. A volcanic centre in Mexico’s Pacific con- magnitude: examples from the late Cenozoic Newer tinental shelf. In: Ne´meth,K.,Carrasco-Nu´n˜ez,G., Volcanics Province, south-eastern Australia. Journal Aranda-Go´mez,J.J.&Smith,I.E.M.(eds)Monoge- of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 301, 81–89. netic Volcanism. Geological Society, London, Special Bohnenstiehl, D.R., Howell, J.K., White, S.M. & Publications, 446. First published online March 3, Hey, R.N. 2012. A modified basal outlining algorithm 2017, https://doi.org/10.1144/ SP446.12 for identifying topographic highs from gridded eleva- Aranda-Go´mez, J.J., Cerca,M.et al. 2016. Structural tion data, Part 1: motivation and methods. Computers evidence of enhanced active subsidence at the bottom & Geosciences, 49, 308–314. of a maar: Rinco´n de Parangueo, Me´xico. In: Ne´meth, Boivin,P.&Thouret, J.C. 2014. The Volcanic Chaıˆne K., Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G., Aranda-Go´mez, J.J. & des Puys: a unique collection of simple and compound Smith, I.E.M. (eds) Monogenetic Volcanism. Geolog- monogenetic edifices. In: Fort,M.&Andre´, M.-F. ical Society, London, Special Publications, 446. First (eds) Landscapes and Landforms of France. Springer, published online September 29, 2016, https://doi. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 81–91. org/10.1144/SP446.1 Borrero, C., Murcia, H., Agustı´n-Flores, J., Arbo- Arce, J.L., Layer, P.W., Lassiter, J.C., Benowitz, leda, M.T. & Giraldo, A.M. 2016. Pyroclastic J.A., Macias, J.L. & Ramirez-Espinosa, J. 2013. deposits of San Diego maar, central Colombia: an 40Ar/39Ar dating, geochemistry, and isotopic analyses example of a silicic magma-related monogenetic erup- of the Quaternary Chichinautzin volcanic field, south tion in a hard substrate. In: Ne´meth, K., Carrasco- of Mexico City: implications for timing, eruption Nu´ n˜ez, G., Aranda-Go´mez, J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. rate, and distribution of volcanism. Bulletin of Volca- (eds) Monogenetic Volcanism. Geological Society, nology, 75, 774. London, Special Publications, 446. First published Aydin, F., Schmitt, A.K. et al. 2014. Quaternary bimo- online December 15, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/ dal volcanism in the Nig˘de Volcanic Complex (Cappa- SP446.10 docia, central Anatolia, Turkey): age, petrogenesis and Boyce, J. 2013. The of south- geodynamic implications. Contributions to - eastern Australia: a new classification scheme and dis- ogy and Petrology, 168, 1078. tribution map for eruption centres. Australian Journal Ba´ez,W.,Carrasco-Nu´n˜ez,G.,Giordano,G.,Vira- of Earth Sciences, 60, 449–462. monte,J.&Chiodi, A. 2016. Polycyclic scoria cones Boyce, J.A., Keays, R.R., Nicholls, I.A. & Hayman,P. of the basin, Southern Puna 2014. Eruption centres of the Hamilton area of the , Argentina. In: Ne´meth,K.,Carrasco-Nu´n˜ez, Newer Volcanics Province, Victoria, Australia: pin- G., Aranda-Go´mez,J.J.&Smith, I.E.M. (eds) Mono- pointing volcanoes from a multifaceted approach to genetic Volcanism. Geological Society, London, Special landform mapping. Australian Journal of Earth Sci- Publications, 446. First published online September 26, ences, 61, 735–754. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP446.3 Boyce, J.A., Nicholls, I.A., Keays, R.R. & Hayman, Bailey, K., Garson, M., Kearns,S.&Velasco, A.P. P.C. 2015. Variation in parental magmas of Mt 2005. Carbonate volcanism in Calatrava, central Rouse, a complex polymagmatic monogenetic volcano : a report on the initial findings. Mineralogical in the basaltic intraplate Newer Volcanics Province, Magazine, 69, 907–915. southeast Australia. Contributions to and Baker, J.A., Menzies, M.A., Thirlwall, M.F. & Petrology, 169, 11. Macpherson, C.G. 1997. Petrogenesis of quaternary Bradshaw, T.K. & Smith, E.I. 1994. Polygenetic quater- intraplate volcanism, Sana’a, Yemen: implications nary volcanism at Crater Flat, Nevada. Journal of Vol- for plume-lithosphere interaction and polybaric melt canology and Geothermal Research, 63, 165–182. hybridization. Journal of Petrology, 38, 1359–1390. Bradshaw, T.K., Hawkesworth, C.J. & Gallagher,K. Barnett, W.P. 2008. The rock mechanics of kimberlite 1993. Basaltic volcanism in the Southern Basin and volcanic pipe excavation. Journal of Volcanology Range – no role for a . Earth and Plane- and Geothermal Research, 174, 29–39. tary Science Letters, 116, 45–62. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

Brand, B.D. & White, C.M. 2007. Origin and stratigra- Evolution of harrats Khaybar, Ithnayn, and Kura, phy of phreatomagmatic deposits at the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; with Suppl. Data 91-06. Sinker Butte Volcano, Western , Geological Society of America Bulletin, 103, 363–391. Idaho. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Campeny, M., Mangas, J., Melgarejo, J.C., Bambi, A., Research, 160, 319–339. Alfonso, P., Gernon,T.&Manuel, J. 2014. The Brenna, M., Cronin, S.J., Smith, I.E.M., Sohn, Y.K. & Catanda extrusive (Kwanza Sul, Angola): Ne´meth, K. 2010. Mechanisms driving polymagmatic an example of explosive carbonatitic volcanism. Bulle- activity at a monogenetic volcano, Udo, Jeju Island, tin of Volcanology, 76, 818. South Korea. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrol- Can˜o´n-Tapia, E. 2014. Volcanic eruption triggers: a hier- ogy, 160, 931–950. archical classification. Earth-Science Reviews, 129, Brenna, M., Cronin, S.J., Ne´meth, K., Smith, I.E.M. & 100–119. Sohn, Y.K. 2011. The influence of magma plumbing Can˜o´n-Tapia, E. 2016. Reappraisal of the significance of complexity on monogenetic eruptions, Jeju Island, volcanic fields. Journal of Volcanology and Geother- Korea. Terra Nova, 23, 70–75. mal Research, 310, 26–38. Brenna, M., Cronin, S.J., Smith, I.E.M., Maas,R.& Can˜o´n-Tapia,E.&Walker, G.P.L. 2004. Global aspects Sohn, Y.K. 2012a. How small-volume basaltic mag- of volcanism: the perspectives of ‘’ matic systems develop: a case study from the Jeju and ‘volcanic systems’. Earth-Science Reviews, 66, Island Volcanic Field, Korea. Journal of Petrology, 163–182. 53, 985–1018. Capaccioni, B., Vaselli, O., Santo,A.&Yalire,M. Brenna, M., Cronin, S.J., Smith, I.E.M., Sohn, Y.K. & 2003. Monogenic and polygenic volcanoes in the area Maas, R. 2012b. Spatio-temporal evolution of a dis- between the Nyiragongo summit crater and the Lake persed magmatic system and its implications for vol- Kivu shoreline. Acta Vulcanologica, 14, 129–136. cano growth, Jeju Island Volcanic Field, Korea. Carn, S.A. 2000. The Lamongan volcanic field, East Java, Lithos, 148, 337–352. Indonesia: physical volcanology, historic activity and Brenna, M., Ne´meth, K., Cronin, S.J., Sohn, Y.K., hazards. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Smith, I.E.M. & Wijbrans, J. 2015. Co-located mono- Research, 95, 81–108. genetic eruptions similar to 200 kyr apart driven by Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G., Davila-Harris, P., Riggs, N.R., tapping vertically separated mantle source regions, Ort, M.H., Zimmer, B.W., Willcox, C.P. & Bran- Chagwido, Jeju Island, Republic of Korea. Bulletin of ney, M.J. 2012. Recent explosive volcanism at the Volcanology, 77, 43. eastern Trans-Mexican volcanic belt. In: Aranda- Brooker, M.R., Houghton, B.F., Wilson, C.J.N. & Go´mez, J.J., Tolson,G.&Molina-Garza, R.S. Gamble, J.A. 1993. Pyroclastic phases of a rhyolitic (eds) The Southern and Beyond. GSA dome-building eruption – Puketarata tuff ring, Taupo Field Guides, 25, 83–113. Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. Bulletin of Volcanology, Cas, R.A.F., van Otterloo, J., Blaikie, T.N. & van den 55, 395–406. Hove, J. 2016. The dynamics of a very large intra-plate Bucchi, F., Lara, L.E. & Gutierrez, F. 2015. The continental basaltic volcanic province, the Newer Vol- Carran-Los Venados volcanic field and its relationship canics Province, SE Australia, and implications for with coeval and nearby polygenetic volcanism in an other provinces. In: Ne´meth, K., Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, intra-arc setting. Journal of Volcanology and Geother- G., Aranda-Go´mez, J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. (eds) mal Research, 308, 70–81. Monogenetic Volcanism. Geological Society, London, Buechner, J., Tietz, O., Viereck, L., Suhr,P.&Abra- Special Publications, 446. First published online tis, M. 2015. Volcanology, geochemistry and age of November 7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP446.8 the Lausitz Volcanic Field. International Journal of Cebria´, J.M., Martiny, B.M., Lopez-Ruiz,J.&Moran- Earth Sciences, 104, 2057–2083. Zenteno, D.J. 2011. The Paricutin calc-alkaline Bursik, M., Sieh,K.&Meltzner, A. 2014. Deposits of lavas: new geochemical and petrogenetic modelling the most recent eruption in the Southern Mono Craters, constraints on the crustal assimilation process. Jour- California: description, interpretation and implications nal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 201, for regional marker . Journal of Volcanology 113–125. and Geothermal Research, 275, 114–131. Cembrano,J.&Lara, L. 2009. The link between volca- Cajz, V., Rapprich, V., Erban, V., Pecskay,Z.&Radon, nism and tectonics in the southern volcanic zone of M. 2009. Late volcanic activity in the Ceske the Chilean Andes: a review. Tectonophysics, 471, stredohori (Ohre/Eger Graben, northern 96–113. Bohemia). Geologica Carpathica, 60, 519–533. Choi, S.H., Mukasa, S.B., Kwon, S.T. & Andronikov, Camp, V.E. & Roobol, M.J. 1989. The Arabian continen- A.V. 2006. Sr, Nd, Pb and Hf isotopic compositions tal alkali basalt province; Part I, Evolution of Harrat of late Cenozoic alkali basalts in South Korea: evi- Rahat, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; with Suppl. Data dence for mixing between the two dominant astheno- 89-04. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 101, spheric mantle domains beneath East Asia. Chemical 71–95. Geology, 232, 134–151. Camp, V.E. & Roobol, M.J. 1992. Upwelling astheno- Clague, D. 1987. Hawaiian xenolith population, magma sphere beneath Western Arabia and its regional impli- supply rates, and development of magma chambers. cations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Bulletin of Volcanology, 49, 577–587. 97, 15 255–15 271. Clague, D.A. & Dixon, J.E. 2000. Extrinsic controls on Camp, V.E., Roobol, M.J. & Hooper, P.R. 1991. The the evolution of Hawaiian ocean island volcanoes. Arabian continental alkali basalt province; Part II. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 1, 1010. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Cole, J.W., Spinks, K.D., Deering, C.D., Nairn, I.A. & Druitt, T.H., Brenchley, P.J., Go¨kten, Y.E. & Fran- Leonard, G.S. 2010. Volcanic and structural evolu- caviglia, V. 1995. Late Quaternary rhyolitic eruptions tion of the Okataina Volcanic Centre; dominantly sili- from the Acigol Complex, central Turkey. Journal of cic volcanism associated with the Taupo Rift, New the Geological Society, London, 152, 655–667, Zealand. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.152.4.0655 Research, 190, 123–135. Duda,A.&Schmincke, H.U. 1978. Quaternary basan- Cole, J.W., Deering, C.D., Burt, R.M., Sewell, S., ites, melilite and tephrites from the Shane, P.A.R. & Matthews, N.E. 2014. Okataina area (Germany). Neues Jahrbuch fuer Volcanic Centre, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand: Mineralogie Abhandlungen, 132, 1–33. a review of volcanism and synchronous pluton devel- Erlund, E.J., Cashman, K.V., Wallace, P.J., Pioli, L., opment in an active, dominantly silicic caldera system. Rosi, M., Johnson,E.&Granados, H.D. 2010. Earth-Science Reviews, 128, 1–17. Compositional evolution of magma from Paricutin Condit, C.D. & Connor, C.B. 1996. Recurrence rates of Volcano, Mexico: the tephra record. Journal of Volca- volcanism in basaltic volcanic fields: an example from nology and Geothermal Research, 197, 167–187. the Springerville volcanic field, Arizona. Geological Ersoy, E.Y. & Palmer, M.R. 2013. Eocene–Quaternary Society of America Bulletin, 108, 1225–1241. magmatic activity in the Aegean: implications for man- Condit, C.D., Crumpler, L.S., Aubele, J.C. & Elston, tle metasomatism and magma genesis in an evolving W.E. 1989. Patterns of volcanism along the south- . Lithos, 180, 5–24. ern margin of the Plateau: the Springer- Ersoy, E.Y., Helvaci,C.&Palmer, M.R. 2010. Mantle ville Field. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94, source characteristics and melting models for the 7975–7986. early-middle Miocene mafic volcanism in Western Connor, C.B. 1987. Structure of the Michoacan- Anatolia Implications for enrichment processes of Guanajuato Volcanic Field, Mexico. Journal of Volca- mantle lithosphere and origin of K-rich volcanism in nology and Geothermal Research, 33, 191–200. post-collisional settings. Journal of Volcanology and Connor, C.B. 1990. clustering in the Geothermal Research, 198, 112–128. TransMexican volcanic belt: Implications for struc- Ersoy, Y.E., Helvaci,C.&Palmer, M.R. 2012a. tural and petrologic models. Journal of Geophysical Petrogenesis of the Neogene volcanic units in the Research: Solid Earth, 95, 19,395–19,405. NE–SW-trending basins in western Anatolia, Turkey. Connor, C.B. & Conway, F.M. 2000. Basaltic volcanic Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 163, fields. In: Sigurdsson, H. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Volca- 379–401. noes. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 331–343. Ersoy, Y.E., Helvaci, C., Uysal, I., Karaoglu, O., Conrad, C.P., Bianco, T.A., Smith, E.I. & Wessel,P. Palmer, M.R. & Dindi, F. 2012b. Petrogenesis of 2011. Patterns of intraplate volcanism controlled by the Miocene volcanism along the Izmir-Bahkesir asthenospheric . Nature Geoscience , 4, 317–321. Transfer Zone in western Anatolia, Turkey: implica- Cook, C., Briggs, R.M., Smith, I.E.M. & Maas, R. 2005. tions for origin and evolution of potassic volcanism Petrology and geochemistry of intraplate basalts in the in post-collisional areas. Journal of Volcanology and South Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand: evi- Geothermal Research, 241, 21–38. dence for two coeval magma suites from distinct Farmer, G.L., Glazner, A.F., Wilshire, H.G., Wooden, sources. Journal of Petrology, 46, 473–503. J.L., Pickthorn, W.J. & Katz, M. 1995. Origin of late Delcamp, A., van Wyk de Vries, B., Stephane,P.& Cenozoic basalts at the Cima volcanic field, Mojave Kervyn, M. 2014. Endogenous and exogenous growth Desert, California. Journal of Geophysical Research: of the monogenetic Lemptegy volcano, Chaine des Solid Earth, 100, 8399–8415. Puys, France. Geosphere, 10, 998–1019. Fornaciai, A., Favalli, M., Karatson, D., Tarquini,S. Demidjuk, Z., Turner, S., Sandiford, M., George, R., & Boschi, E. 2012. Morphometry of scoria cones, and Foden,J.&Etheridge, M. 2007. U-series isotope their relation to geodynamic setting: a DEM-based and geodynamic constraints on mantle melting pro- analysis. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal cesses beneath the Newer Volcanic Province in South Research, 217, 56–72. Australia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 261, Franz, G., Breitkreuz,C.et al. 1997. The alkaline Mei- 517–533. dob volcanic field (Late Cenozoic, northwest ). Dennen, R.L., Bursik, M.I. & Roche, O. 2014. Dome Journal of African Earth Sciences, 25, 263–291. collapse mechanisms and block-and-ash flow emplace- Franz, G., Steiner, G., Volker, F., Pudlo,D.&Ham- ment dynamics inferred from deposit and impact mark merschmidt, K. 1999. Plume related alkaline magma- analysis, Mono Craters, CA. Journal of Volcanology tism in central Africa – the Meidob Hills (W Sudan). and Geothermal Research, 276,1–9. Chemical Geology, 157, 27–47. Di Traglia, F., Morelli, S., Casagli,N.&Gardun˜o Friese, N., Bense, F.A., Tanner, D.C., Gustafsson, L.E. Monroy, V.H. 2014. Semi-automatic delimitation & Siegesmund, S. 2013. From feeder dykes to scoria of volcanic edifice boundaries: validation and appli- cones: the tectonically controlled plumbing system of cation to the cinder cones of the Tancitaro–Nueva the Rauoholar volcanic chain, Northern Volcanic Italia region (Michoaca´n–Guanajuato Volcanic Field, Zone, Iceland. Bulletin of Volcanology, 75, 11. Mexico). , 219, 152–160. Fullea, J., Camacho, A.G., Negredo, A.M. & Fernan- Dohrenwend, J.C., Wells, S.G. & Turrin, B.D. 1986. dez, J. 2015. The Canary Islands hot spot: new insights Degradation of quaternary cinder cones in the Cima from 3D coupled geophysical–petrological modelling volcanic field, , California. Geological of the lithosphere and uppermost mantle. Earth and Society of America Bulletin, 97, 421–427. Planetary Science Letters, 409, 71–88. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

Fulop,A.&Kurszlaukis, S. 2014. It takes two to tango. Magmatic Evolution of the Snake River Plain Volcanic Or: how polygenetic is a monogenetic volcano? In: Province. Idaho Geological Survey Bulletin, 30, Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G., Aranda-Go´mez, J.J., Ort, 387–435. M.H. & Silva-Corona, J.J. (eds) 5th International Godchaux, M.M., Bonnichsen,B.&Jenks, M.D. 1992. Maar Conference, Abstracts Volume. Universidad Types of phreatomagmatic volcanoes in the western Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Centro de Geocien- Snake River plain, Idaho, USA. Journal of Volcanol- cias, Juriquilla, Mexico, 149–150. ogy and Geothermal Research, 52, 1–25. Fulop,A.&Kurszlaukis, S. 2016. Monogenetic Graettinger, A.H., Valentine, G.A. & Sonder,I. v. polygenetic kimberlite volcanism: in-depth exami- 2015. Circum-crater variability of deposits from dis- nation of the Tango Extension Super Structure, Atta- crete, laterally and vertically migrating volcanic explo- wapiskat kimberlite field, Ontario, . In: sions: experimental evidence and field implications. Ne´meth, K., Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G., Aranda-Go´mez, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. (eds) Monogenetic Volcanism. 308, 61–69. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, Gudmundsson, A. 2003. Surface stresses associated with 446. First published online September 23, 2016, arrested dykes in rift zones. Bulletin of Volcanology, updated November 4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/ 65, 606–619. SP446.7 Guilbaud, M.N., Siebe, C., Layer, P., Salinas, S., Galipp, K., Klugel,A.&Hansteen, T.H. 2006. Chang- Castro-Govea, R., Garduno-Monroy, V.H. & Le ing depths of magma fractionation and stagnation dur- Corvec, N. 2011. Geology, , and tec- ing the evolution of an oceanic island volcano: La tonic setting of the Jorullo Volcano region, Michoacan, Palma (Canary Islands). Journal of Volcanology and Mexico. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Geothermal Research, 155, 285–306. Research, 201, 97–112. Gamble, J.A., Price, R.C., Smith, I.E.M., McIntosh, Haase, K.M. & Renno, A.D. 2008. Variation of magma W.C. & Dunbar, N.W. 2003. 40Ar/39Ar geochronol- generation and mantle sources during continental rift- ogy of magmatic activity, magma flux and hazards at ing observed in Cenozoic lavas from the Eger Rift, Ruapehu volcano, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zea- Central Europe. Chemical Geology, 257, 195–205. land. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Haase, K.M., Worthington, T.J. & Stoffers, P. 2004. Research, 120, 271–287. Variation of the slab input and its effects on partial Gao, W., Li, J., Mao,X.&Li, H. 2013. Geological and melting along the Kermadec arc. Geochimica et Cos- geomorphological value of the monogenetic volcanoes mochimica Acta, 68, A615–A615. in Wudalianchi National Park, NE China. Geoheritage, Hansteen, T.H., Klugel,A.&Schmincke, H.U. 1998. 5, 73–85. Multi-stage magma ascent beneath the Canary Islands: Gente, P., Dyment, J., Maia,M.&Goslin, J. 2003. evidence from fluid inclusions. Contributions to Min- Interaction between the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the eralogy and Petrology, 132, 48–64. Azores hot spot during the last 85 Myr: emplacement Harangi, S., Jankovics, M.E., Sagi, T., Kiss , B., Lukacs, and rifting of the hot spot-derived . Geochem- R. & Soos, I. 2015. Origin and geodynamic relation- istry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 4, 8514. ships of the Late Miocene to Quaternary alkaline basalt Geshi, N. 2000. Fractionation and magma mixing within volcanism in the Pannonian basin, eastern-central intruding swarms:evidence from the Miocene Shi- Europe. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 104, tara–Otoge igneous complex, central Japan. Journal of 2007–2032. Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 98, 127–152. Hasebe, N., Fukutani, A., Sudo,M.&Tagami, T. 2001. Geshi, N. 2001. Melt segregation by localized shear defor- Transition of eruptive style in an arc-arc collision zone: mation and fracturing during crystallization of magma K–Ar dating of Quaternary monogenetic and polyge- in shallow intrusions of the Otoge volcanic complex, netic volcanoes in the Higashi-Izu region, Izu penin- central Japan. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal sula, Japan. Bulletin of Volcanology, 63, 377–386. Research, 106, 285–300. Hasenaka,T.&Carmichael, I.S.E. 1985. A compilation Geshi,N.&Oikawa, T. 2014. The spectrum of basaltic of location, size, and geomorphological parameters of feeder systems from effusive lava eruption to explosive volcanoes of the Michoacan–Guanajuato volcanic eruption at Miyakejima volcano, Japan. Bulletin of field, central Mexico. Geofisica Internacional, 24, Volcanology, 76, 797. 577–608. Geshi, N., Ne´meth,K.&Oikawa, T. 2011. Growth of Hasenaka,T.&Carmichael, I.S.E. 1987. The cinder phreatomagmatic explosion craters: a model inferred cones of Michoacan–Guanajuato, central Mexico: from Suoana crater in Miyakejima Volcano, Japan. petrology and chemistry. Journal of Petrology, 28, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 241–269. 201, 30–38. Herzberg, C. 2004. Partial crystallization of mid-ocean Geshi, N., Kusumoto,S.&Gudmundsson, A. 2012. ridge basalts in the crust and mantle. Journal of Petrol- Effects of mechanical layering of host rocks on dike ogy, 45, 2389–2405. growth and arrest. Journal of Volcanology and Geo- Herzberg,C.&O’Hara, M.J. 1998. Phase equilibrium thermal Research, 223, 74–82. constraints on the origin of basalts, picrites, and Godchaux,M.&Bonnichsen, B. 2002. Syneruptive . Earth-Science Reviews, 44, 39–79. magma–water and posteruptive lava–water interac- Herzberg, C., Asimow, P.D. et al. 2007. Temperatures tions in the Western Snake River Plain, Idaho, during in ambient mantle and plumes: constraints from the past 12 million years. In: Bonnichsen, B., basalts, picrites, and komatiites. Geochemistry, Geo- White, C.M. & McCurry, M. (eds) Tectonic and physics, Geosystems, 8, Q02006. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Hildreth, W. 2004. Volcanological perspectives on Long Kereszturi,G.&Ne´meth, K. 2012a. Monogenetic Valley, , and Mono Craters: sev- basaltic volcanoes: genetic classification, growth, geo- eral contiguous but discrete systems. Journal of Volca- morphology and degradation. In: Ne´meth, K. (ed.) nology and Geothermal Research, 136, 169–198. Updates in Volcanology – New Advances in Under- Hintz, A.R. & Valentine, G.A. 2012. Complex plumb- standing Volcanic Systems. inTech Open, Rijeka, Cro- ing of monogenetic scoria cones: new insights from atia, 3–88, https://doi.org/10.5772/51387 the Lunar Crater Volcanic Field (Nevada, USA). Jour- Kereszturi,G.&Ne´meth , K. 2012b. Structural and mor- nal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 239, phometric irregularities of eroded Pliocene scoria 19–32. cones at the Bakony–Balaton Highland Volcanic Hirschmann,M.M.,Kogiso,T.,Baker,M.B.&Stolper, Field, Hungary. Geomorphology, 136, 45–58. E.M. 2003. Alkalic magmas generated by partial melt- Kereszturi,G.&Ne´meth, K. 2016. Post-eruptive sedi- ing of garnet . Geology, 31, 481–484. ment transport and surface processes on unvegetated Ho, C.H. 1991. Time trend analysis of basaltic volcanism volcanic hillslopes – a case study of Black Tank scoria for the site. Journal of Volcanology cone, , California. Geomorphol- and Geothermal Research, 46, 61–72. ogy, 267, 59–75. Houghton, B.F., Lloyd, E.F., Wilson, C.J.N. & Lan- Kereszturi, G., Ne´meth, K., Csillag, G., Balogh,K.& phere, M.A. 1991. K–Ar ages from the Western Kova´cs, J. 2011. The role of external environmental Dome Belt and associated rhyolitic lavas in the factors in changing eruption styles of monogenetic Maroa Taupo area, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zea- volcanoes in a Mio/Pleistocene continental volcanic land. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophys- field in western Hungary. Journal of Volcanology ics, 34, 99–101. and Geothermal Research, 201, 227–240. Howell, J.K., White, S.M. & Bohnenstiehl, D.R. Kereszturi, G., Jordan, G., Ne´meth,K.&Doniz- 2012. A modified basal outlining algorithm for identi- Paez, J.F. 2012. Syn-eruptive morphometric vari- fying topographic highs in gridded elevation data, part ability of monogenetic scoria cones. Bulletin of 2: application to Springerville Volcanic Field. Comput- Volcanology, 74, 2171–2185. ers & Geosciences, 49, 315–322. Kereszturi, G., Ne´meth, K., Cronin, S.J., Agustin- Hsu, C.N. & Chen, J.C. 1998. Geochemistry of late Ceno- Flores, J., Smith, I.E.M. & Lindsay, J. 2013. A zoic basalts from Wudalianchi and Jingpohu areas, model for calculating eruptive volumes for monoge- Heilongjiang Province, northeast China. Journal of netic volcanoes – implication for the Quaternary Asian Earth Sciences, 16, 385–405. Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Journal of Irving, A.J. & Green, D.H. 2008. Phase relationships of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 266, 16–33. hydrous alkalic magmas at high pressures: production Kereszturi, G., Ne´meth, K., Cronin, S.J., Procter,J. of hawaiitic to mugearitic liquids by & Agustin-Flores, J. 2014. Influences on the vari- -dominated fractional crystallization within ability of eruption sequences and style transitions in the lithospheric mantle. Journal of Petrology, 49, the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Journal 741–756. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 286, Irving, A.J. & Price, R.C. 1981. Geochemistry and evolu- 101–115. tion of lherzolite-bearing phonolitic lavas from Nige- Kereszturi, G., Bebbington,M.&Ne´meth, K. 2017. ria, Australia, East Germany and New Zealand. Forecasting transitions in monogenetic eruptions using Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta , 45, 1309–1320. the geologic record. Geology, first published online Johnson, E., Wallace, P., Chashman, K., Granados, January 2017, https://doi.org/10.1130/G38596.1 H.D. & Kent, A. 2008. Magmatic volatile contents Kiyosugi, K., Connor, C.B., Wetmore, P.H., Ferwerda, and degassing-induced crystallization at Volca´n Jor- B.P., Germa, A.M., Connor, L.J. & Hintz, A.R. 2012. ullo, Mexico: implications for melt evolution and the Relationship between dike and volcanic conduit distri- plumbing systems of monogenetic volcanoes. Earth bution in a highly eroded monogenetic volcanic field: and Planetary Science Letters, 269, 478–487. San Rafael, , USA. Geology, 40, 695–698. Jordan, S.C., Cas, R.A.F. & Hayman, P.C. 2013. The ori- Klugel, A., Hansteen, T.H. & Galipp, K. 2005. Magma gin of a large (.3 km) maar volcano by coalescence of storage and underplating beneath Cumbre Vieja Vol- multiple shallow craters: Lake Purrumbete maar, cano, La Palma (Canary Islands). Earth and Planetary southeastern Australia. Journal of Volcanology and Science Letters, 236, 211–226. Geothermal Research, 254, 5–22. Ko´sik, S., Ne´meth, K., Kereszturi, G., Procter, J.N., Jordan, S.C., Jowitt, S.M. & Cas, R.A.F. 2015. Origin of Zellmer, G.F. & Geshi, N. 2016. Phreatomagma- temporal–compositional variations during the erup- tic and water-influenced Strombolian eruptions of a tion of Lake Purrumbete Maar, Newer Volcanics Prov- small-volume complex on the southern ince, southeastern Australia. Bulletin of Volcanology, ringplain of Mt. Ruapehu, New Zealand: facies archi- 77, 883. tecture and eruption mechanisms of the Ohakune Kazanci, N., Gevrek, A.I. & Varol, B. 1995. Facies Volcanic Complex controlled by an unstable fissure changes and high calorific peat formation in a Quater- eruption. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal nary maar lake, Central Anatolia, Turkey – the possi- Research, 327, 99–115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ble role of geothermal processes in a closed lacustrine jvolgeores.2016.07.005 basin. Sedimentary Geology, 94, 255–266. Kshirsagar, P., Siebe, C., Noelle Guilbaud, M., Keller, J. 1975. Quaternary maar volcanism near Karapi- Salinas,S.&Layer, P.W. 2015. Late Pleisto- nar in central Anatolia. Bulletin Volcanologique, 38, cene Alberca de Guadalupe maar volcano (Zacapu 378–396. basin, Michoacan): stratigraphy, tectonic setting, and Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

paleo-hydrogeological environment. Journal of Volca- magmatism. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, nology and Geothermal Research, 304, 214–236. 10, Q12017. Kshirsagar, P., Siebe, C., Noelle Guilbaud,M.& Lopez-Escobar,L.&Moreno, H. 1981. Erupcion de Salinas, S. 2016. Geological and environmental 1979 del Volca´n Mirador, Andes del Sur, 40821′S: car- controls on the change of eruptive style (phreatomag- acteristicas geoquimicas de las lavas y xenolithos gran- matic to Strombolian-effusive) of Late Pleistocene El iticos. Revista Geologica de Chile, 13–14, 17–33. Caracol tuff cone and its comparison with adjacent Lopez-Escobar, L., Cembrano,J.&Moreno, H. 1995. volcanoes around the Zacapu basin (Michoacan, Geochemistry and tectonics of the Chilean Southern Mexico). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Andes basaltic Quaternary volcanism (37–468S). Research, 318, 114–133. Revista Geologica de Chile, 22, 219–234. Kurszlaukis,S.&Barnett, W.P. 2003. Volcanologi- Lorenz, V. 1987. Phreatomagmatism and its relevance. cal and structural aspects of the Venetia kimberlite Chemical Geology, 62, 149–156. cluster – a case study of South African kimberlite Lorenz, V. 2007. Syn- and posteruptive hazards of maar- maar-diatreme volcanoes. South African Journal of diatreme volcanoes. Journal of Volcanology and Geo- Geology, 106, 165–192. thermal Research, 159, 285–312. Kurszlaukis,S.&Fulop, A. 2013. Factors controlling Lorenz, V., Suhr,P.&Suhr, S. 2016. Phreatomagmatic the internal facies architecture of maar-diatreme volca- maar–diatreme volcanoes and their incremental noes. Bulletin of Volcanology, 75, 761. growth: a model. In: Ne´meth, K., Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, Kurszlaukis,S.&Lorenz, V. 1997. Volcanological fea- G., Aranda-Go´mez, J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. (eds) Mono- tures of a low-viscosity melt: the carbonatitic gross genetic Volcanism. Geological Society, London, Brukkaros Volcanic Field, Namibia. Bulletin of Volca- Special Publications, 446. First published online Sep- nology, 58, 421–431. tember 27, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP446.4 Kurszlaukis,S.&Lorenz, V. 2016. Differences and Luhr, J.F. & Simkin, T. 1993. Paricutin. The Volcano similarities between emplacement models of kimber- Born in a Mexican Cornfield. Geosciences Press, Phoe- lite and basaltic maar–diatreme volcanoes. In: Ne´m- nix, AZ. eth, K., Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G., Aranda-Go´mez, Lutz, H. 2014. The ancient volcanoes of Central J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. (eds) Monogenetic Volcanism. France – Nicolas Desmarest’s famous volcano- Geological Society, London, Special Publications, geomorphological map in an unrecorded print from 446. First published online October 5, 2016, updated 1811. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur 10 November 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP446.5 Geowissenschaften, 165, 395–406. Le Corvec, N., Menand,T.&Lindsay, J. 2013a. Inter- Maclennan, J. 2008. Short length-scale compositional action of ascending magma with pre-existing crustal heterogeneity in basalts and their mantle sources. Geo- fractures in monogenetic basaltic volcanism: an exper- chimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72, A582–A582. imental approach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Manville, V., Ne´meth,K.&Kano, K. 2009. Source to Solid Earth, 118, 968–984. sink: a review of three decades of progress in the under- Le Corvec, N., Sporli, K.B., Rowland,J.&Lindsay,J. standing of volcaniclastic processes, deposits, and haz- 2013b. Spatial distribution and alignments of volcanic ards. Sedimentary Geology, 220, 136–161. centers: clues to the formation of monogenetic volca- Maro,G.&Caffe, P.J. 2016a. The Cerro Bitiche Andes- nic fields. Earth-Science Reviews, 124, 96–114. itic Field: petrological diversity and implications for Leeman, W.P. & Bonnichsen, B. 2005. Overview of sili- magmatic evolution of mafic volcanic centers from cic volcanism of the Snake River Plain –Yellowstone the northern Puna. Bulletin of Volcanology, 78, 51. (SRPY) province. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Maro,G.&Caffe, P.J. 2016b. Neogene monogenetic 69, A237–A237. volcanism from the Northern Puna region: products Leeman, W.P., Lewis, J.F., Evarts, R.C., Conrey, R.M. and eruptive styles. In: Ne´meth, K., Carrasco- & Streck, M.J. 2005. Petrologic constraints on the Nu´ n˜ez, G., Aranda-Go´mez, J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. thermal structure of the Cascades arc. Journal of Vol- (eds) Monogenetic Volcanism. Geological Society, canology and Geothermal Research, 140, 67–105. London, Special Publications, 446. First published Lensky, N.G., Niebo, R.W., Holloway, J.R., Lyakhov- online September 26, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/ sky,V.&Navon, O. 2006. Bubble nucleation as a trig- SP446.6 ger for xenolith entrapment in mantle melts. Earth and Martin,U.&Ne´meth, K. 2005. Eruptive and depositio- Planetary Science Letters, 245, 278–288. nal history of a Pliocene tuff ring that developed in a Lindsay, J.M., Leonard, G.S., Smid, E.R. & Hayward, fluvio-lacustrine basin: Kissomlyo volcano (western B.W. 2011. Age of the Auckland volcanic field: a Hungary). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal review of existing data. New Zealand Journal of Geol- Research, 147, 342–356. ogy and Geophysics, 54, 379–401. Martin-Serrano, A., Vegas,J.et al. 2009. Morphotec- Liu, J.Q., Chu, G.Q., Han, J.T., Rioual, P., Jiao, W.Y. & tonic setting of maar lakes in the Campo de Calatrava Wang, K.J. 2009. Volcanic eruptions in the , (Central Spain, SW Europe). Sedimen- volcanic field, northeastern China, during the past tary Geology, 222, 52–63. 15 000 years. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 34, Mazzarini,F.&D’Orazio, M. 2003. Spatial distribu- 645–654. tion of cones and satellite-detected lineaments in the Longpre´, M.-A., Troll, V.R., Walter, T.R. & Hans- Pali Aike Volcanic Field (southernmost Patagonia): teen, T.H. 2009. Volcanic and geochemical evolution insights into the tectonic setting of a Neogene rift of the Teno massif, Tenerife, Canary Islands: some system. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal repercussions of giant on ocean island Research, 125, 291–305. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

McGee, L.E. & Smith, I.E.M. 2016. Interpreting chemical Special Publications, 446. First published online Sep- compositions of small scale basaltic systems: a review. tember 30, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP446.2 Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Needham, A.J., Lindsay, J.M., Smith, I.E.M., Augusti- 325, 45–60. nus,P.&Shane, P.A. 2011. Sequential eruption of McGee, L.E., Millet, M.-A., Smith, I.E.M., Ne´meth,K. alkaline and sub-alkaline magmas from a small mono- & Lindsay, J.M. 2012. The inception and progression genetic volcano in the Auckland Volcanic Field, New of melting in a monogenetic eruption: Motukorea Vol- Zealand. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal cano, the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Research, 201, 126–142. Lithos, 155, 360–374. Ne´meth, K. 2010. Monogenetic volcanic fields: Origin, McGee, L.E., Smith, I.E.M., Millet, M.-A., Handley, sedimentary record, and relationship with polygenetic H.K. & Lindsay, A.M. 2013. Asthenospheric control volcanism. In: Can˜o´n-Tapia,E.&Szaka´cs,A. of melting processes in a monogenetic basaltic system: (eds) What is a Volcano? Geological Society of Amer- a case study of the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zea- ica, Special Papers, 470, 43–66. land. Journal of Petrology, 54, 2125–2153. Ne´meth,K.&Cronin, S.J. 2009a. Phreatomagmatic vol- McGee, L.E., Millet, M.-A., Beier, C., Smith, I.E.M. & canic hazards where rift-systems meet the sea, a study Lindsay, J.M. 2015. Mantle heterogeneity controls on from Ambae Island, Vanuatu. Journal of Volcanology small-volume basaltic volcanism. Geology, 43, and Geothermal Research, 180, 246–258. 551–554. Ne´meth,K.&Cronin, S.J. 2009b. Volcanic structures McKnight, S.B. & Williams, S.N. 1997. Old cinder cone and oral traditions of volcanism of Western Samoa or young composite volcano?: the nature of Cerro (SW Pacific) and their implications for hazard educa- Negro, Nicaragua. Geology, 25, 339–342. tion. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Menzies, M., Kempton,P.&Dungan, M. 1985. Interac- Research, 186, 223–237. tion of Continental Lithosphere and Asthenospheric Ne´meth,K.&Cronin, S.J. 2011. Drivers of explosivity Melts Below the Geronimo Volcanic Field, Arizona, and elevated hazard in basaltic fissure eruptions: the USA. Journal of Petrology, 26, 663–693. 1913 eruption of Ambrym Volcano, Vanuatu Menzies, M.A., Kyle, P.R., Jones,M.&Ingram,G. (SW-Pacific). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal 1991. Enriched and depleted source components Research, 201, 194–209. for tholeiitic and alkaline lavas from Zuni-Bandera, Ne´meth,K.&Kereszturi, G. 2015. Monogenetic volca- New-Mexico – inferences about intraplate proces- nism: personal views and discussion. International ses and stratified lithosphere. Journal of Geophy- Journal of Earth Sciences, 104, 2131–2146. sical Research: Solid Earth and Planets, 96, Ne´meth,K.&Martin, U. 2007. Shallow and dyke 13,645–13,671. complex in western Hungary as a possible feeding sys- Moufti, M.R. & Ne´meth, K. 2014. The White Mountains tem of phreatomagmatic volcanoes in ‘soft-rock’ envi- of Harrat Khaybar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Interna- ronment. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal tional Journal of Earth Sciences, 103, 1641–1643. Research, 159, 138–152. Moufti, M.R., Moghazi, A.M. & Ali, K.A. 2012. Ne´meth, K., White, J.D.L., Reay,A.&Martin,U. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Neogene–Quaternary 2003. Compositional variation during monogenetic Harrat Al-Madinah intercontinental Volcanic Field, volcano growth and its implications for magma supply Saudi Arabia: implications for duration and migration to continental volcanic fields. Journal of the Geologi- of volcanic activity. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, cal Society, London, 160, 523–530, https://doi.org/ 62, 253–268. 10.1144/0016-764902-131 Moufti, M.R., Ne´meth, K., El-Masry,N.&Qaddah, Ne´meth, K., Cronin, S.J., Smith, I.E.M. & Flores, J.A. A. 2015. Volcanic geotopes and their geosites pre- 2012. Amplified hazard of small-volume monogenetic served in an arid climate related to landscape and cli- eruptions due to environmental controls, Orakei Basin, mate changes since the Neogene in Northern Saudi Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Bulletin of Arabia: Harrat Hutaymah (Hai’il Region). Geoherit- Volcanology, 74, 2121–2137. age, 7, 103–118. Nowell, D. 2008. The Chaine des Puys volcanoes of the Muffler, L.J.P., Clynne, M.A., Calvert, A.T. & Auvergne, France. Geology Today, 24, 231–238. Champion, D.E. 2011. Diverse, discrete, mantle- O’Reilly,S.&Griffin, W.L. 1985. A xenolith-derived derived batches of basalt erupted along a short normal getherm for southeastern Australia and its geophysical zone: the Poison Lake chain, southernmost Cas- implications. Tectonophysics, 111, 41–63. cades. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 123, Pan, Y.C. & Batiza, R. 2003. Magmatic processes under 2177–2200. mid-ocean ridges: a detailed mineralogic study of lavas Murcia, H., Ne´meth,K.et al. 2015. The Al-Du’aythah from East Pacific Rise 9830′N, 10830′N, and 11820′N. volcanic cones, Al-Madinah City: implications for vol- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 4, 8623. canic hazards in northern Harrat Rahat, Kingdom of Peters, T.J., Menzies, M., Thirlwall,M.&Kyle, P.R. Saudi Arabia. Bulletin of Volcanology, 77, 54. 2008. Zuni-Bandera volcanism, Rio Grande, USA – Murcia, H., Lindsay, J.M. et al. 2016. Geology and geo- Melt formation in garnet- and spinel-facies mantle chemistry of Late Quaternary volcanism in northern straddling the astheno sphere-lithosphere boundary. Harrat Rahat, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: implications Lithos, 102, 295–315. for eruption dynamics, regional stratigraphy and Petrone, C.M., Francalanci, L., Carlson, R.W., Fer- magma evolution. In: Ne´meth, K., Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, rari,L.&Conticelli, S. 2003. Unusual coexistence G., Aranda-Go´mez, J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. (eds) Mono- of subduction-related and intraplate-type magmatism: genetic Volcanism. Geological Society, London, Sr, Nd and Pb isotope and trace element data Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH

from the magmatism of the San-Pedro- late Pleistocene and active subaquatic volcanism graben (Nayarit, Mexico). Chemical Geology, 193, since the in Lake Kivu, East African Rift. 1–24. Geomorphology, 221, 274–285. Petronis, M.S., Delcamp,A.&de Vries,B.v.W. 2013. Ross, K.A., Schmid, M., Ogorka, S., Muvundja, F.A. & Magma emplacement into the Lempte´gy scoria cone Anselmetti, F.S. 2015. The history of subaquatic vol- (Chaane_ Des Puys, France) explored with structural, canism recorded in the sediments of Lake Kivu; East anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility, and paleomag- Africa. Journal of Paleolimnology, 54, 137–152. netic data. Bulletin of Volcanology, 75, 753. Ross, P.-S. & White, J.D.L. 2006. Debris jets in continen- Putirka, K. 1997. Magma transport at Hawaii: inferences tal phreatomagmatic volcanoes; a field study of their based on igneous thermobarometry. Geology, 25, subterranean deposits in the Coombs Hills vent com- 69–72. plex, . Journal of Volcanology and Geother- Putirka, K., Johnson, M., Kinzler, R., Longhi,J.& mal Research, 149, 62–84. Walker, D. 1996. Thermobarometry of mafic igneous Runge, M.G., Bebbington, M.S., Cronin, S.J., Lindsay, rocks based on clinopyroxene–liquid equilibria, 0– J.M. & Moufti, M.R. 2015. Sensitivity to volcanic 30 kbar. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, field boundary. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 4, 123, 92–108. 1–18. Putirka, K.D. 2005. Mantle potential temperatures at Saucedo, R., Macias, J.L. et al. 2017. Mixed Hawaii, Iceland, and the mid-ocean ridge system, as magmatic–phreatomagmatic explosions during the inferred from : evidence for ther- formation of the Joya Honda maar, San Luis Potosı´, mally driven mantle plumes. Geochemistry, Geophys- Mexico. In: Ne´meth, K., Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G., ics, Geosystems, 6, Q05L08. Aranda-Go´mez, J.J. & Smith, I.E.M. (eds) Mono- Putirka, K.D., Perfit, M., Ryerson, F.J. & Jackson, genetic Volcanism. Geological Society, London, M.G. 2007. Ambient and excess mantle temperatures, Special Publications, 446. First published online Feb- olivine thermometry, and active v. passive upwelling. ruary 28, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1144/SP446.11 Chemical Geology, 241, 177–206. Schaaf, P., Stimac, J., Siebe,C.&Macias, J.L. 2005. Rasoazanamparany, C., Widom,E.et al. 2016. Tempo- Geochemical evidence for mantle origin and crustal ral and compositional evolution of Jorullo volcano, processes in volcanic rocks from Popocatepetl and sur- Mexico: implications for magmatic processes associ- rounding monogenetic volcanoes, central Mexico. ated with a monogenetic eruption. Chemical Geology, Journal of Petrology, 46, 1243–1282. 434, 62–80. Schmincke, H.U., Lorenz,V.et al. 1983. The Quater- Re, G., White, J.D.L. & Ort, M.H. 2015. Dikes, sills, and nary Eifel Volcanic Fields. Springer, Berlin. stress-regime evolution during emplacement of the Schwarz, S., Klugel,A.&Wohlgemuth-Ueber- Jagged Rocks Complex, Hopi Buttes Volcanic Field, wasser, C. 2004. Melt extraction pathways and Navajo Nation, USA. Journal of Volcanology and stagnation depths beneath the Madeira and Desertas Geothermal Research, 295, 65–79. rift zones (NE Atlantic) inferred from barometric stud- Reay, A., McIntosh, P.E. & Gibson, I.L. 1991. Lherzo- ies. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 147, lite xenolith bearing flows from the east Otago prov- 228–240. ince: crystal fractionation of upper mantle magmas. Shane, P. 2015. Contrasting textures and New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, geochemistry in response to magma dynamics in an 34, 317–327. intra-caldera rhyolite system, Okataina volcano. Jour- Reiners, P.W. & Nelson, B.K. 1998. Temporal- nal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 297, compositional-isotopic trends in rejuvenated-stage 1–10. magmas of Kauai, Hawaii, and implications for mantle Sheth, H. 2014. What drives centuries-long polygenetic melting processes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, scoria cone activity at Barren Island volcano? Journal 62, 2347–2368. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 289, Ridolfi, F., Renzulli, A., Perugini, D., Cesare, B., 64–80. Braga,R.&Del Moro, S. 2016. Unravelling the Siebe, C. 1986. On the possible use of cinder cones and complex interaction between mantle and crustal mag- maars as paleoclimatic indicators in the closed basin mas encoded in the lavas of San Vincenzo (Tuscany, of Serdan-Oriental, Puebla, Mexico. Journal of Volca- Italy). Part II: geochemical overview and modelling. nology and Geothermal Research, 28, 397–400. Lithos, 244, 233–249. Siebe,C.&Macias, J.L. 2006. in the Riggs,N.&Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G. 2004. Evolution of a Mexico City metropolitan area from eruptions at Popo- complex isolated dome system, Cerro Pizarro, central catepetl, , and Jocotitlan stratovolca- Mexico. Bulletin of Volcanology, 66, 322–335. noes and monogenetic scoria cones in the Sierra Roeder, P.L. & Emslie, R.F. 1970. Olivine-Liquid Equi- Chichinautzin volcanic field. In: Siebe, C., Macias, librium. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, J.L. & Aguirre-Diaz, G.J. (eds) Neogene–Quarter- 29, 275–289. nary Continental Margin Volcanism: A Perspective Rosenthal, A., Foley, S.F., Pearson, D.G., Nowell, from Me´xico. Geological Society of America, Special G.M. & Tappe, S. 2009. Petrogenesis of strongly alka- Papers, 402, 253–329. line primitive volcanic rocks at the propagating tip of Siebe,C.&Salinas, S. 2014. Distribution of monogene- the western branch of the East African Rift. Earth tic phreatomagmatic volcanoes (maars, tuff-cones and Planetary Science Letters, 284, 236–248. and tuff-rings) in the Mexican Volcanic Belt and Ross, K.A., Smets, B., De Batist, M., Hilbe, M., Schmid, their tectonic and hydrogeologic environment. M. & Anselmetti, F.S. 2014. Lake-level rise in the In: Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez, G., Aranda-Go´mez, J.J., Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

MONOGENETIC VOLCANISM: INTRODUCTION

Ort, M.H. & Silva-Corona, J.J. (eds) 5th Interna- Szabo´,C.&Bodnar, R.J. 1996. Changing magma ascent tional Maar Conference, Abstracts Volume. Universi- rates in the Nograd-Gomor volcanic field northern dad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Centro de Hungary/southern Slovakia; evidence from CO2-rich Geociencias, Juriquilla, Mexico, 183–184. fluid inclusions in metasomatized upper mantle xeno- Siebe, C., Rodriguez-Lara, V., Schaaf,P.&Abrams, liths. Petrologiya, 4, 240–249. M. 2004. Geochemistry, Sr–Nd isotope composition, Taisne, B., Tait,S.&Jaupart, C. 2011. Conditions for and tectonic setting of Holocene Pelado, Guespalapa the arrest of a vertical propagating dyke. Bulletin of and Chichinautzin scoria cones, south of Mexico Volcanology, 73, 191–204. City. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Takada, A. 1994. The influence of regional stress and Research, 130, 197–226. magmatic input on styles of monogenetic and polyge- Sieron, K., Capra,L.&Rodriguez-Elizararras,S. netic volcanism. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2014. Hazard assessment at San Martin volcano 99, 13,563–13,573. based on geological record, numerical modeling, and Tamura, Y., Nakajima, J., Kodaira,S.&Hasegawa,A. spatial analysis. Natural Hazards, 70, 275–297. 2009. Tectonic setting of volcanic centers in subduc- Smith, I.E.M., Blake, S., Wilson, C.J.N. & Houghton, tion zones: three-dimensional structure of mantle B.F. 2008. Deep-seated fractionation during the rise of wedge and arc crust. In: Connor, C.B., Chapman, a small-volume basalt magma batch: Crater Hill, Auck- N.A. & Connor, L.J. (eds) Volcanic and Tectonic land, New Zealand. Contributions to Mineralogy and Hazard Assesment for Nuclear Facilities. Cambridge Petrology, 155, 511–527. University Press, Cambridge, 176–195. Smith, V.C., Shane,P.&Nairn, I.A. 2005. Trends in Tanaka, K.L., Shoemaker, E.M., Ulrich, G.E. & rhyolite geochemistry, mineralogy, and magma storage Wolfe, E.W. 1986. Migration of Volcanism in the during the last 50 kyr at Okataina and Taupo volcanic San-Francisco Volcanic Field, Arizona. Geological centres, Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. Journal Society of America Bulletin, 97, 129–141. of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 148, Timm, C., Hoernle,K.et al. 2010. Temporal and 372–406. geochemical evolution of the Cenozoic intraplate vol- Smith, V.C., Shane,P.&Nairn, I. 2010. Insights into canism of Zealandia. Earth-Science Reviews, 98, silicic melt generation using plagioclase, and 38–64. melt inclusions from the caldera-forming Rotoiti erup- Ulrych, J., Dostal, J., Adamovic, J., Jelinek, E., tion, Taupo volcanic zone, New Zealand. Contribu- Spacek, P., Hegner,E.&Balogh, K. 2011. Recur- tions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 160, 951–971. rent Cenozoic volcanic activity in the Bohemian Mas- Sohn, Y.K. & Chough, S.K. 1989. Depositional pro- sif (Czech Republic). Lithos, 123, 133–144. cesses of the Suwolbong Tuff Ring, Cheju Island Valentine, G.A. & Hirano, N. 2010. Mechanisms of (Korea). Sedimentology, 36, 837–855. low-flux intraplate volcanic fields-Basin and Range Spera, F.J. 1984. in petrogenesis III: (North America) and northwest Pacific Ocean. Geol- role of volatiles in the ascent of alkaline magma ogy, 38, 55–58. with special reference to xenolith-bearing mafic Valentine, G.A. & Keating, G.N. 2007. Eruptive styles lavas. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, and inferences about plumbing systems at Hidden 88, 217–232. Cone and Little scoria cone volcanoes Stevenson, R.J., Briggs, R.M. & Hodder, A.P.W. 1994. (Nevada, USA). Bulletin of Volcanology, 70, 105–113. Physical volcanology and emplacement history of the Valentine, G.A. & Krogh, K.E.C. 2006. Emplacement Ben-Lomond rhyolite lava flow, Taupo Volcanic of shallow dikes and sills beneath a small basaltic vol- Zone, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology canic center – the role of pre-existing structure (Paiute and Geophysics, 37, 345–358. Ridge, southern Nevada, USA). Earth and Planetary Stoppa,F.&Schiazza, M. 2013. An overview of mono- Science Letters, 246, 217–230. genetic carbonatitic magmatism from Uganda, Italy, Valentine, G.A. & Perry, F.V. 2007. Tectonically con- China and Spain: volcanologic and geochemical fea- trolled, time-predictable basaltic volcanism from a tures. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 41, lithospheric mantle source (central Basin and Range 140–159. Province, USA). Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Stroncik, N.A., Kluegel,A.&Hansteen, T.H. 2009. 261, 201–216. The magmatic plumbing system beneath El Hierro Valentine, G.A., Gaffney, E.S., Damjanac,B.& (Canary Islands): constraints from phenocrysts and Krogh, K.E. 2007. Saucer-shaped sills at shallow naturally quenched basaltic glasses in submarine depths beneath a scoria cone volcano (Paiute Ridge, rocks. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, Nevada). Eos, Transactions of the American Geophys- 157, 593–607. ical Union, 88, (52, Suppl.), Abstract V11A-0370. Suhr,P.&Goth, K. 2009. Three times at the same place Valentine, G.A., Shufelt, N.L. & Hintz, A.R.L. 2011. with different stuff. In: Haller, M.J. & Massafero, Models of maar volcanoes, Lunar Crater (Nevada, G.I. (eds) Third International Maar Conference – USA). Bulletin of Volcanology, 73, 753–765. Abstract Volume. Asociacion Geologica Argentina, van Otterloo,J.&Cas, R.A.F. 2016. Low-temperature Publicaciones Especiales, Resumes y Eventos, Serie emplacement of phreatomagmatic pyroclastic flow D, 12, 120–121. deposits at the monogenetic Mt Gambier Volcanic Sutherland, F.L., Raynor, L.R. & Pogson, R.E. 1994. Complex, South Australia, and their relevance for Spinel to garnet lherzolite transition in relation to high- understanding some deposits in diatremes. Journal of temperature paleogeotherms, Eastern Australia. Aus- the Geological Society, London, 173, 701–710, tralian Journal of Earth Sciences, 41, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1144/jgs2015-122 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 28, 2021

I. E. M. SMITH & K. NE´ METH van Otterloo, J., Cas, R.A.F. & Sheard, M.J. 2013. White, J.D.L. & Ross, P.S. 2011. Maar-diatreme volca- Eruption processes and deposit characteristics at the noes: a review. Journal of Volcanology and Geother- monogenetic Mt. Gambier Volcanic Complex, SE mal Research, 201, 1–29. Australia: implications for alternating magmatic and Wijbrans, J., Ne´meth, K., Martin,U.&Balogh,K. phreatomagmatic activity. Bulletin of Volcanology, 2007. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of Neogene phreato- 75, 737. magmatic volcanism in the western Pannonian Basin, Van Otterloo, J., Raveggi, M., Cas, R.A.F. & Maas,R. Hungary. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal 2014. Polymagmatic activity at the monogenetic Mt Research, 164, 193–204. Gambier Volcanic Complex in the Newer Volcanics Wilshire, H.G., McGuire, A.V., Noller, J.S. & Turrin, Province, SE Australia: new insights into the occur- B.D. 1991. Petrology of lower crustal and upper mantle rence of intraplate volcanic activity in Australia. Jour- xenoliths from the Cima Volcanic Field, California. nal of Petrology, 55, 1317–1351. Journal of Petrology, 32, 169–200. van Wyk de Vries, B., Marquez, A., Herrera, R., Wood, C.A. 1980. Morphometric evolution of cinder Granja Bruna, J.L., Llanes,P.&Delcamp,A. cones. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal 2014. Craters of elevation revisited: forced-folds, bulg- Research, 7, 387–413. ing and uplift of volcanoes. Bulletin of Volcanology, Wright, J.B. 1973. Continental drift, magmatic provinces 76, 875. and mantle plumes. Nature, 244, 565–567. von Veh, M.W. & Ne´meth, K. 2009. An assessment of Xiao,L.&Wang, C.Z. 2009. Geologic features of Wuda- the alignments of vents on geostatistical analysis in lianchi volcanic field, northeastern China: implications the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand. Geo- for Martian volcanology. Planetary and Space Science, morphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 15, 57, 685–698. 175–186. Zhang, M., Suddaby, P., Thompson, R.N., Thirlwall, Walker, G.P.L. 2000. Basaltic volcanoes and volcanic M.F. & Menzies, M.A. 1995. Potassic volcanic-rocks systems. In: Sigurdsson, H., Houghton, B.F., in NE China – geochemical constraints on mantle McNutt, S.R., Rymer,H.&Stix, J. (eds) Encyclope- source and magma genesis. Journal of Petrology, 36, dia of Volcanoes. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1275–1303. 283–290. Zhao, Y.-W., Fan, Q.-C., Zou,H.&Li, N. 2014. Geo- White, J.D.L. 1990. Depositional architecture of a maar- chemistry of Quaternary basaltic lavas from the Nuo- pitted playa; sedimentation in the Hopi Buttes volcanic min volcanic field, Inner Mongolia: implications for field, northeastern Arizona, U.S.A. Sedimentary Geol- the origin of potassic volcanic rocks in Northeastern ogy, 67, 55–84. China. Lithos, 196, 169–180. White, J.D.L. 1991. The depositional record of small, Zimmer, B.W., Riggs, N.R. & Carrasco-Nu´ n˜ez,G. monogenetic volcanoes within terrestrical basins. In: 2010. Evolution of tuff ring-dome complex: the case Fisher, R.V. & Smith, G.A. (eds) Sedimentation in study of Cerro Pinto, eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Volcanic Settings. SEMP (Society for Sedimentary Belt. Bulletin of Volcanology, 72, 1223–1240. Geology), Special Publications, 45, 155–171. Zou, H., Reida, M.R., Liub, Y., Yaoc, Y., Xud.& ,X Fa, White, J.D.L. 1996. Pre-emergent construction of a lacus- Q. 2003. Constraints on the origin of historic potassic trine basaltic volcano, , Utah (USA). basalts from northeast China by U–Th disequilibrium Bulletin of Volcanology, 58, 249–262. data. Chemical Geology, 200, 189–201.