Diverse and Value-Creating Ownership

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diverse and Value-Creating Ownership Meld. St. 27 (2013–2014) Report the Storting to St. Meld. Meld. St. 27 (2013–2014) Report to the Storting (white paper) Published by: Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries Diverse and value-creating Internet address: www.government.no Photo: Olaf Schjelderup and UNINETT AS, Norsk Hydro, Flytoget, ownership Cermaq, Telenor, Hanne H. Christiansen and Unis, Øyvind Hagen and Statoil ASA, Yara International, Alan O’Neill and Statoil ASA Printed by: DSS 03/2015 Diverse and value-creating ownership E JØM RKE IL T M 2 4 9 1 7 3 Trykksak Table of contents 1 Introduction and summary ...... 7 Part II Prerequisites for private 1.1 Background to the report ............. 7 ownership in Norway.............. 25 1.2 Summary ......................................... 8 1.2.1 Ownership – significance for value 3 Ownership in Norway ................ 27 creation ........................................... 8 3.1 The Norwegian capital market – 1.2.2 Prerequisites for private ownership overview and figures ...................... 27 in Norway ....................................... 8 3.1.1 The equity market .......................... 28 1.2.3 The state’s ownership administered 3.1.2 The external capital market .......... 31 directly by the ministries .............. 10 3.1.3 Other characteristics ..................... 31 3.2 Asset management and Part I Ownership – significance for ownership in Norway ..................... 31 value creation ........................ 13 3.2.1 Private ownership ........................... 31 3.2.2 Public ownership ............................ 37 2 Ownership – significance and development trends ................... 15 4 Private ownership as a 2.1 The significance of ownership for main rule ....................................... 39 value creation ................................. 15 4.1 Why should private ownership 2.1.1 The importance of capital be the main rule? ............................ 39 allocation ......................................... 15 4.2 The challenges of state ownership 40 2.1.2 The importance of the exercise 4.2.1 The state’s different roles .............. 40 of ownership ................................... 15 4.2.2 Concentration of power ................. 41 2.1.3 Owner composition and owner 4.2.3 Limited industrial expertise .......... 41 types ................................................ 17 4.3 The government’s policy for 2.2 What characterises good strengthening private ownership .. 41 owners? ........................................... 17 4.3.1 Framework conditions ................... 42 2.2.1 Owners focused on capital 4.3.2 Tax ................................................... 42 allocation ......................................... 18 4.3.3 Other measures .............................. 44 2.2.2 Long-term strategic owners .......... 18 2.2.3 Owners focused on operational Part III The state’s ownership involvement .................................... 19 administered directly by the 2.3 Trends and developments in the ministries.............................. 45 exercise of ownership .................... 19 2.3.1 Polarisation between passive and 5 The present state ownership active owners .................................. 19 administered directly by the 2.3.2 Faster global industrial and ministries ...................................... 47 technological developments ......... 20 5.1 Overview ......................................... 47 2.3.3 Growth in long-term state 5.2 Historical developments ................ 48 ownership with expansive agendas ........................................... 21 6 Why should the state own? ...... 50 2.3.4 Greater expectations of 6.1 Justifications for state ownership . 50 responsible ownership .................. 22 6.1.1 Correction of market failures ........ 50 2.3.5 Increased awareness of the 6.1.2 Maintaining important companies, long-term value trend of head office functions and key companies ....................................... 22 competences in Norway ................ 51 2.3.6 Increase in activist investors ........ 23 6.1.3 Management of common natural 2.3.7 Effective board work has become resources ......................................... 52 a more important competitive 6.1.4 Sectoral-policy and societal factor ............................................... 24 considerations ................................. 52 6.2 Alternative instruments to state ownership ........................................ 54 6.3 Categorisation of the companies under direct ownership ................. 55 7 What should the state own? .... 57 8.2.8 Principle 7. The board assumes 7.1 Changes to the state’s ownership 57 executive responsibility for 7.1.1 Reduction in the state’s direct administration of the company, ownership over time ...................... 57 including performing an independent 7.1.2 Value-increasing transactions ....... 58 supervisory function vis-à-vis the 7.1.3 Demergers and the creation of company’s management on behalf new state companies ...................... 58 of the owners. ................................. 72 7.1.4 Factors to be emphasised in the 8.2.9 Principle 8. The board should event of changes to the state’s adopt a plan for its own work, and ownership ....................................... 59 work actively to develop its own 7.2 Ministerial powers ......................... 59 competencies and evaluate its own activities. ................................. 73 8 How should the state own? ...... 60 8.2.10 Principle 9. Compensation and 8.1 Framework for the state’s incentive schemes shall promote ownership administration ............. 60 value creation within the companies 8.1.1 Constitutional framework ............. 60 and be generally regarded as 8.1.2 The minister’s authority within reasonable ....................................... 74 the company ................................... 61 8.2.11 Principle 10. The company shall 8.1.3 Administration of the company .... 62 work systematically to safeguard its 8.1.4 Specifically concerning manage- corporate social responsibility ...... 74 ment of companies wholly owned 8.3 Details of the state’s corporate by the state ..................................... 62 targets and expectations ................ 75 8.1.5 Other frameworks .......................... 63 8.3.1 Returns and dividends ................... 75 8.2 The Norwegian state’s principles 8.3.2 Board work ..................................... 77 of corporate governance ............... 67 8.3.3 Corporate social responsibility ..... 80 8.2.1 Introduction to the principles ....... 67 8.3.3.1 Overarching and general 8.2.2 Principle 1. All shareholders shall be expectations .................................... 82 treated equally. ............................... 68 8.3.3.2 Climate and environment .............. 83 8.2.3 Principle 2. There shall be 8.3.3.3 Human rights .................................. 84 transparency in the state’s 8.3.3.4 Labour rights .................................. 84 ownership of companies. ............... 68 8.3.3.5 Commitment to anti-corruption 8.2.4 Principle 3. Ownership decisions practices and transparency in and resolutions shall be made at financial transactions ..................... 85 the general meeting. ...................... 69 8.3.3.6 The Government’s follow-up of 8.2.5 Principle 4. The board is responsible corporate social responsibility ...... 85 for elaborating explicit objectives 8.3.4 Executive salaries ........................... 85 and strategies for the company within 8.3.5 Research, development, innovation the constraints of its articles of and expertise .................................. 86 association; the state sets 8.3.6 Diversity and equality .................... 88 performance targets for each 8.4 Contact with companies ................ 88 company. ......................................... 70 8.4.1 Particular about information 8.2.6 Principle 5. The capital structure exchange in companies wholly of the company shall be appropriate owned by the state ......................... 88 given the objective and situation 8.5 The state’s various roles ................ 89 of the company. .............................. 71 8.5.1 Organisation of the state’s 8.2.7 Principle 6. The composition of the ownership administration .............. 89 board shall be characterised by 8.5.2 Further development of the state’s competence, capacity and diversity exercise of ownership .................... 90 and shall reflect the distinctive characteristics of each company. 71 9 A review of the state’s direct ownership interests .................... 91 9.1 Category I – Companies with commercial objectives ................... 91 9.1.1 Ambita AS ....................................... 91 9.1.2 Baneservice AS ............................... 92 9.1.3 Cermaq ASA ................................... 92 9.4 Category 4 – Companies with 9.1.4 Entra Holding AS ........................... 93 sectoral-policy objectives ............... 109 9.1.5 Flytoget AS ..................................... 94 9.4.1 Andøya Space Center AS ............... 109 9.1.6 Mesta AS ......................................... 94 9.4.2 Avinor AS ........................................ 110 9.1.7 SAS AB ............................................ 95 9.4.3 Bjørnøen AS .................................... 111 9.1.8 Veterinærmedisinsk 9.4.4 Eksportkreditt Norge AS ............... 111 Oppdragssenter AS ........................ 96 9.4.5 Enova SF ......................................... 112 9.2 Category 2 – Companies with 9.4.6 Gassco AS ......................................
Recommended publications
  • Mal Rapporter
    TØI report 1420/2015 Erik Figenbaum Marika Kolbenstvedt Pathways to electromobility - perspectives based on Norwegian experiences TØI Report 1420/2015 Pathways to electromobility - perspectives based on Norwegian experiences Erik Figenbaum Marika Kolbenstvedt This report is covered by the terms and conditions specified by the Norwegian Copyright Act. Contents of the report may be used for referencing or as a source of information. Quotations or references must be attributed to the Institute of Transport Economics (TØI) as the source with specific mention made to the author and report number. For other use, advance permission must be provided by TØI. ISSN 0808-1190 ISBN 978-82-480-1645-8 Paper version ISBN 978-82-480-1643-4 Electronic version Oslo, May 2015 Title: Pathways to electromobility - perspectives based on Tittel: Veier til elektromobilitet - perspektiver basert på norske Norwegian experiences erfaringer Author(s): Erik Figenbaum Forfattere: Erik Figenbaum Marika Kolbenstvedt Marika Kolbenstvedt Date: 05.2015 Dato: 05.2015 TØI report: 1420/2015 TØI rapport: 1420/2015 Pages 65 Sider 65 ISBN Paper: 978-82-480-1645-8 ISBN Papir: 978-82-480-1645-8 ISBN Electronic: 978-82-480-1643-4 ISBN Elektronisk: 978-82-480-1643-4 ISSN 0808-1190 ISSN 0808-1190 Financed by: EU 7th FP (Electromobility+) Finansieringskilde: EU 7th FP (Electromobility+) Institute of Transport Economics Norges forskningsråd The Research Council of Norway Transnova Transnova Transportøkonomisk institutt Project: 3826 - Compett Prosjekt: 3826 - Compett Project manager: Erik Figenbaum Prosjektleder: Erik Figenbaum Quality manager: Terje Assum Kvalitetsansvarlig: Terje Assum Key words: Diffusion Emneord: Brukergrupper Electric Vehicles Diffusjon Multi-Level Perspective Elbil Policy Fler-nivå analyse Regional transition Politikk User groups Regional endring Summary: Sammendrag: The report presents two analyses of the Norwegian Electric Rapporten presenterer to analyser av den norske elbilhistorien.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Growth and Spatial Planning in the Nordic City Regions: an Overview of Concepts and Policies
    Green growth and spatial planning in the Nordic city regions: An overview of concepts and policies Aslı Tepecik Diş ed. NORDREGIO WORKING PAPER 2014:5 Green growth and spatial planning in the Nordic city regions: An overview of concepts and policies Green growth and spatial planning in the Nordic city regions: An overview of concepts and policies Aslı Tepecik Diş ed. Christian Dymén, Christian Fredricsson, Veronique Larsson, Liisa Perjo, Lukas Smas and Ryan Weber. Green growth and spatial planning in the Nordic city regions: An overview of concepts and policies Nordregio Working Paper 2014:5 ISBN 978-91-87295-22-5 ISSN 1403-2511 © Nordregio 2014 Nordregio P.O. Box 1658 SE-111 86 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] www.nordregio.se www.norden.org Editor: Aslı Tepecik Diş Christian Dymén, Christian Fredricsson, Veronique Larsson, Liisa Perjo, Lukas Smas and Ryan Weber. Cover photo: Johannes Jansson / norden.org Nordic co-operation Nordic co-operation is one of the world’s most extensive forms of regional collaboration, involving Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and the Faroe Islands, Greenland, and Åland. Nordic co-operation has fi rm traditions in politics, the economy, and culture. It plays an important role in European and inter- national collaboration, and aims at creating a strong Nordic community in a strong Europe. Nordic co-operation seeks to safeguard Nordic and regional interests and principles in the global community. Common Nordic values help the region solidify its position as one of the world’s most innovative and competitive. The Nordic Council is a forum for co-operation between the Nordic parliaments and governments.
    [Show full text]
  • IFE ANNUAL REPORT 2018 1 Årsrapport for Institutt for Energiteknikk
    Research for a better future YEAR www.ife.no IFE ANNUAL REPORT 2018 1 Årsrapport for Institutt for Energiteknikk. Med forbehold om trykkfeil. Grafisk design og trykk: CopyCat AS Foto: Mick Tully, Image Communication Layout: Copycat AS 2 RESEARCH FOR A BETTER FUTURE Contents 04 About IFE 05 Key figures 07 From the President 11 Organisation chart 12 IFE’s strategic research focus 16 Materials and Process Technology 20 Centres for Environment-friendly Energy Research (FME) 23 Fluid Flow and Environmental Technology 26 Digital Systems 28 Radiopharmacy 31 IFE’s nuclear research activities 34 Nuclear Waste Management and Decommissioning 38 Environment and safety 41 Innovation and commercialisation 42 Income statement 43 Report of the Board of Directors IFE ANNUAL REPORT 2018 3 About IFE The Institute for Energy Technology (IFE) conducts research for a better future. Since 1948, we have been a frontrunner in international energy research. The knowledge we have developed has saved the petroleum industry several hundred billion kroner. We have contributed to the development of ground-breaking cancer medicine, new solutions in renewable energy, more energy-efficient industrial processes, zero-emission transport solutions and future-oriented energy systems. Our research and expertise have led to safer use of nuclear power, and we have developed methods for verifying the disarmament of nuclear weapons. The research at IFE has created jobs in Norway, facilitated business development and generated important expertise for the Norwegian trade and industry sector. At IFE, we build bridges between research, education and industry. We have extensive infrastructure and full-scale laboratories where theoretical models are transformed into commercial activities.
    [Show full text]
  • SELF STORAGE GROUP ASA Nedre Skøyen Vei 24, 0276 Oslo Postboks 4127 Sjølyst, 0217 Oslo Org No: 818 096 712
    SELF STORAGE GROUP ASA Nedre Skøyen vei 24, 0276 Oslo Postboks 4127 Sjølyst, 0217 Oslo Org no: 818 096 712 Self Storage Group ASA: Acquisition of Eurobox Minilager AS, property acquisitions in Oslo and contemplated private placement NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA, JAPAN OR THE UNITED STATES DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA, JAPAN OR THE UNITED STATES OR ANYOTHER JURISDICTION IN WHICH THE RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION WOULD BE UNLAWFUL. THIS ANNOUNCEMENT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER OF ANY OF THE SECURITIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. Self Storage Group ASA: Acquisition of Eurobox Minilager AS, property acquisitions in Oslo and contemplated private placement (Oslo, 25 June 2019) Self Storage Group ASA (“Self Storage Group” or the “Company”) has on 25 June 2019 entered into an agreement with First Risk Capital AS to acquire 100% of the shares in Eurobox Minilager AS (the management company of Eurobox in Norway) and the associated property companies Eurobox Billingstad AS, Cron Gruppen AS and Cron Invest AS (collectively referred to as “Eurobox” and the “Eurobox Acquisition”). In addition, Self Storage Group has agreed on the purchase price of two additional properties in Oslo, located at Skøyen and Kalbakken. The closing of these transactions is subject to due diligence and board approval. “Eurobox is a good strategic and geographical fit for Self Storage Group with its leading local market position. The acquisition, in combination with the contemplated acquisition of the two properties at Skøyen and Kalbakken, underlines our ambitious growth strategy of increasing the Company's freehold portfolio in selected markets in Scandinavia, in addition to carry out accretive acquisitions in a fragmented market", says Martin Nes, Chairman of Self Storage Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air Norway
    Summits on the Air Norway (LA) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S22.1 Issue number 1.9 Date of issue 01-Jan-2013 Participation start date 01-May-2008 Authorised Date: 04-Apr-2008 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Bjørn Henning Bergheim – LB1GB(04.Apr-2008 – 31.May-2010) Aage Grøseth -LA1ENA (01.Jun-2010- ) Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Summits on the Air – ARM for Norway (LA) Table of contents 1 CHANGE CONTROL ......................................................................................................... 4 2 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA................................................................................. 5 2.1 PROGRAMME DERIVATION ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 PUBLIC RIGHT OF ACCESS (ALLEMANNSRETTEN) ............................................................................... 6 2.4 MAPS AND NAVIGATION .................................................................................................................... 7 2.5 DISCLAIMER ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smartphone Application for Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: a Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
    Open Access Protocol BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013117 on 27 March 2017. Downloaded from Smartphone application for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial Iren Borgen,1 Lisa Maria Garnweidner-Holme,1 Anne Flem Jacobsen,2 Kirsti Bjerkan,3 Seraj Fayyad,4 Pål Joranger,1 Anne Marie Lilleengen,1 Annhild Mosdøl,5 Josef Noll,4 Milada Cvancarova Småstuen,1 Laura Terragni,1 Liv Elin Torheim,1 Mirjam Lukasse1 To cite: Borgen I, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Garnweidner-Holme LM, Introduction: The promotion of a healthy diet, Jacobsen AF, et al. physical activity and measurement of blood glucose ▪ Smartphone application for Tailored health information through the Pregnant levels are essential components in the care for women women with gestational + app in Norwegian, Urdu or Somali for women diabetes mellitus: a study with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Smartphones with gestational diabetes mellitus. protocol for a multicentre offer a new way to promote health behaviour. The main ▪ Automatic transfer of blood glucose levels from randomised controlled trial. aim is to investigate if the use of the Pregnant+ app, in the glucometer to the app via Bluetooth Low BMJ Open 2017;7:e013117. addition to standard care, results in better blood Energy. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016- glucose levels compared with current standard care ▪ Privacy protection of participants’ information 013117 only, for women with GDM. through local storage instead of cloud service. Methods and analysis: This randomised controlled ▪ No blinding of participants, staff and researchers ▸ Prepublication history and trial will include 230 pregnant women with GDM but blinding of those analysing samples and the additional material is followed up at 5 outpatient departments (OPD) in the statistician.
    [Show full text]
  • Throndsen Masteroppgave.Pdf (11.49Mb)
    Does the Urban Structure Mobility? A quantitative study of the effects of car ownership, and residential and destination locations on travel behaviour in Greater Oslo Torstein S. Throndsen Master thesis in Human Geography at the Department of Sociology and Human Geography UNIVERSITY OF OSLO 26/5-17 II © Torstein S. Throndsen 2017 Does the Urban Structure Mobility? A quantitative study of the effects of car ownership, and residential and destination locations on travel behaviour in Greater Oslo Torstein S. Throndsen http://www.duo.uio.no/ Print: CopyCat I Abstract This master thesis investigates how urban structures influence travel behaviour in the city region of Oslo and Akershus. Global climate change is one of the greatest challenges of our time. In search for ways to mitigate CO2 emissions, policymakers have turned their eyes to the transport sector. It is often conceived that polycentric city regions with compact, transit- oriented cities and neighbourhoods reduce distances travelled, discourage car use and promote the use of alternative transport modes. Multivariate quantitative models are applied in this thesis to address specifically three shortcomings in the assumed causality between urban structures and travel behaviour. First, car ownership usually overshadows the effect of all other factors on travel behaviour. The findings in this thesis indicate, however, that car ownership function as a mediator between urban structures and travel behaviour. Second, the influence of trip destination locations on travel behaviour is understudied, particularly in a Nordic context. In this thesis, the urban structures at trip destination locations, especially workplace density, turn out to have a major impact on transport mode choice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenge of Sustainable Mobility in Urban Planning and Development in Oslo Metropolitan Area
    Petter Næss Teresa Næss Arvid Strand TØI report 1024/2009 The challenge of sustainable mobility in urban planning and development in Oslo Metropolitan Area TØI report 1024/2009 The challenge of sustainable mobility in urban planning and development in Oslo Metropolitan Area Petter Næss Teresa Næss Arvid Strand The Institute of Transport Economics (TOI) holds the exclusive rights to the use of the entire report and its individual sections. Contents of the report may be used for referencing or as a source of information. Quotations or references must be attributed to TOI as the source with specific mention made to the author and report number. Contents must not be altered. For other use, advance permission must be provided by TOI. The report is covered by the terms and conditions specified by the Norwegian Copyright Act. ISSN 0808-1190 ISBN 978-82-480-0987-0 Electronic version Oslo, juli 2009 Title: The challenge of sustainable mobility in urban Tittel: Utfordringen om bærekraftig mobilitet i byplanlegging planning and development in Oslo Metropolitan og byutvikling i Osloregionen Area Author(s): Petter Næss Forfattere: Petter Næss Teresa Næss Teresa Næss Arvid Strand Arvid Strand Date: 07.2009 Dato: 07.2009 TØI report: 1024/2009 TØI rapport: 1024/2009 Pages 126 Sider 126 ISBN Paper: ISBN Papir: ISBN Electronic: 978-82-480-0987-0 ISBN Elektronisk: 978-82-480-0987-0 ISSN 0808-1190 ISSN 0808-1190 Financed by: Volvo Research and Educational Finansieringskilde: Volvo Research and Educational Foundation Foundation Project:3295 - The challenge
    [Show full text]
  • NGU Report 2005
    Geological Survey of Norway NO-7441 Trondheim, Norway Tel.: 47 73 90 40 00 Telefax 47 73 92 16 20 REPORT Report no.: 2005.044 ISSN 0800-3416 Grading: Open Title: Interpretation of the magnetic anomaly pattern in the Oslo region Authors: Client: Lundin, E., Olesen, O., Kihle, O., J.R. Skilbrei County: Commune: Map-sheet name (M=1:500.000) Map-sheet no. and -name (M=1:50.000) Skien, Oslo, Hamar 1815 I Gran – 1915 IV Hurdal 1815 II Oppkuven - 1915 III Nannestad 1814 I Asker – 1914 1V Oslo 1814 II Drøbak - 1914 III Ski 1813 I Horten – 1913 IV Vannsjø 1813 II Tjøme – 1913 III Fredrikstad Deposit name and grid-reference: Number of pages: 43 Price (NOK): 400,- Map enclosures: 1 Fieldwork carried out: Date of report: Project no.: Person responsible: 2004 10.06.2005 301809 Summary: The Permian Oslo Field contains a large number of interesting magnetic anomalies associated with magmatic rock bodies (lavas, dikes, calderas, and plutons). The area is characterized by large-scale circular to elliptical anomalies related to calderas and plutons, and by linear magnetic anomalies of various trends. The linear anomalies can be subdivided into three genetically different groups, which relate to: 1) Precambrian basement foliation and Paleozoic bedding, 2) Permian dikes that in turn often follow faults, 3) deep weathering of pre-existing weaknesses (joints, faults, and possibly dikes). The first group is not of particular interest to this study and is readily excluded by comparing the anomalies with the geologic map. Anomalies related to dikes and deep weathering tend to crosscut the geology and are hence also easy to distinguish.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Report Summer / Fall 2018
    MARKET REPORT SUMMER / FALL 2018 www.malling.no PAGE 2 MARKET REPORT SUMMER / FALL 2018 / CONTENTS CONTENTS Malling & Co offers services throughout Introduction . 3 the entiresupply chain, and benefits from synergies between the units Macro . 4 — Eiendomshuset Malling & Co is among Nor- Oslo office market . 8 way’s leading advisors and service providers within the field of commercial real estate . We Stavanger . .28 . have acquired our knowledge and experi- Drammen . 30 ence over more than 50 years . Our two divi- sions, Markets and Management, have a total Retail . 34 workforce of around 185 employees . We offer services in the fields of management, rentals, Industrial & Logistics . 36 transactions, valuations, analysis, consulting, tenant representation, energy and environment The transaction market . 38 and project management . Guest column – Worst behind us, but modest upturn . 40 EDITING COMPLETED 15 May 2018 About Malling & Co . 42. DESIGN OG LAYOUT Semway INTRODUCTION / MARKET REPORT SUMMER / FALL 2018 PAGE 3 THE BULL’S FLAVOUR OF THE YEAR: OFFICE RENTAL GROWTH Our regular readers may think that we’re not particularly fond of wild animals – but we simply haven’t seen any bears in the bullpen for a long time. What we can see, however, is a charging bull – one with its horns locked on rental growth. — The Norwegian economy is doing better than we anticipated six months ago, and activity seems to be particularly good in Oslo. Strong employment growth should increase the demand for office space, and the limited availability of attractive vacant space is paving the way for significant rental growth. Despite our general caution in applying cycle analysis to the CRE market, we must admit that our sense is that we are facing a late cycle rental uplift.
    [Show full text]
  • Malling & Co Market Update
    MARKET UPDATE February 2020 Malling & Co Corporate Real Estate was the advisor for Statsbygg in the sales process of the 12 700 m2 development plot at Huseby, Oslo • GDP-growth for Mainland Norway came in at 2.3 % for 2019 compared to 2.2 % in 2018. This is, as we expected, lower than what SSB predicted in their last outlook from December 2019 (2.5 %). Among other reasons, weak consumer spending and industrial production in the fourth quarter contributed to the lower than anticipated growth. We also expect the growth-estimate for 2020, which is currently at 2.4 %, to be revised downwards in SSBs next economic outlook. • The unemployment rate (LFS seasonally adjusted) for November (avg. Oct-Dec) was measured at 4.0 %, which is up 20 bps from the previous three-month period (avg. Sep-Nov). • Employment in Norway increased by 0.9 % between Q4 2018 and Q4 2019, an increase of 23 500 people. Oslo had the highest growth of 1.9 %. This is however much lower than in 2017 and 2018, when employment in Oslo grew by 2.4 % and 2.9 % respectively. Moreover, looking Unemployment rate (Labour force survey) GDP growth Mainland Norway Euro area Employment growth (SSB) at the last three-month period for Norway 4,0 % 5,0 % overall (avg. Oct-Dec), employment decreased by -0.4 % in November. We expect employment 4,0 % 3,0 % to slow down further going forward. Read more about this in our special topic on the next page. 3,0 % 2,0 % • The key policy rate has been kept stable at 2,0 % 1.50 % since it was last revised upwards in 1,0 % September 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Market Report 2017
    Logistics Market Report 2017 Greater Oslo Area Colliers international Logistic Market report 2017 The current market situation is that the appetite The vacancy rate within this market has fallen Summary from both domestic and foreign investors further and is currently just above 8 %. The regarding this sector is huge. The transaction decrease of approximately 2 percentage points volume thus far this year, also suggests that it will is significant and not surprising. A considerable surpass the strong years of 2014, 2015 and 2016 amount of old obsolete stock is removed from the in terms of both volume and share of transaction market, either for conversion or it is not actively total. The attractiveness of the logistics market is marketed any longer. While the vacancy rates This is the third annual Logistics report provided by boosted by long leases and single tenants which has decreased, it is important to note that there Colliers International on the Greater Oslo logistics is both highly desirable amongst most investors are several possible new developments currently in this day in age. Our projection is however that being actively marketed which is not included in market. In that timeframe, we have seen the prime the yield has slowly started to bottom out and the vacancy rate. yield for the logistics sector drop from 6 % to 5 %, we do not foresee such a sharp decrease in the yield level for our 2018 report. A 5 % yield in the Aleksander Gukild significantly more compared to both the office and logistics market is also quite the barrier and we Head of Research retail sectors´ yield development in the same time remain hesitant to suggest that this barrier will MOB +47 92 61 53 38 be broken for the duration of 2017.
    [Show full text]