0435Sasystemwide

STUDENT ACTIVITIES SYSTEMWIDE Report Number 04-35 July 15, 2005 Members, Committee on Audit Raymond W. Holdsworth, Chair Herbert L. Carter, Vice Chair Roberta Achtenberg Debra S. Farar Bob Foster George G. Gowgani William Hauck Staff University Auditor: Larry Mandel Senior Director: Janice Mirza Audit Manager: Jim Usher Senior Auditors: Liz Huber and Tammy Solis BOARD OF TRUSTEES THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background............................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Scope and Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 6 OBSERVATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MANAGEMENT RESPONSES General Environment .................................................................................................................................... 7 Overall Program Evaluations .................................................................................................................... 7 Student Organizations............................................................................................................................... 8 Minor Representative Officers................................................................................................................ 10 Off-Campus Student Activities............................................................................................................... 11 Club Sports Insurance ............................................................................................................................. 13 Chartering Documentation...................................................................................................................... 14 Activity/Event Management ....................................................................................................................... 15 Student Judiciary......................................................................................................................................... 17 ii CONTENTS APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Personnel Contacted APPENDIX B: Management’s Response APPENDIX C: Chancellor’s Acceptance ABBREVIATIONS AAES Academic Affairs, Educational Support – Chancellor’s Office ASI Associated Students, Inc. CAS The Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education CSU California State University CSUB California State University, Bakersfield DoIT Division of Information Technology EO Executive Order GC Government Code IRA Instructionally Related Activities OSPLD Office of Student Programs/Leadership Development REP Resolution of the Committee on Educational Policy SDSU San Diego State University SNAPS Student Needs and Priorities Survey SUAM State University Administrative Manual VPSS Vice President for Student Services iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As a result of a systemwide risk assessment conducted by the Office of the University Auditor during the last quarter of 2002, the Board of Trustees, at its January 2004 meeting, directed that Student Activities be reviewed. Student Activities was partially audited in 1980 in a sequence of audits on Instructionally Related Activities fees. We visited eight campuses from March 15, 2004, through December 3, 2004, and audited the procedures in effect at that time. Campus specific findings and recommendations have been discussed and reported individually. In our opinion, student activities throughout the California State University would benefit from attention to systemwide policy and the means by which such policies are established, interpreted, and communicated particularly pertaining to program evaluations, the relationship of student organizations to the campus, delegations to auxiliary organizations, involvement with student activities occurring off-campus, documenting/retaining student organization and event approvals, and recording disciplinary probations. The following summary provides management with an overview of conditions requiring attention. Areas of review not mentioned in this section were found to be satisfactory. Numbers in brackets [ ] refer to page numbers in the report. GENERAL ENVIRONMENT [7] Systemwide policies for certain critical aspects of student organizations and activities were non-existent, informally established, and undocumented, outdated, and/or unclear. The chancellor’s office had not developed policies, procedures, and/or systemwide guidelines for student activities program evaluation. Additionally, there were very few standard systemwide policies, procedures, guidelines, and/or benchmarks for student organizations and activities and a lack of definition regarding appropriate delegation between campuses and auxiliary organizations. Existing systemwide policy for minor representative officers was not consistently followed and did not include monitoring requirements, while existing policy for club sports insurance was outdated and unfamiliar to some campus management. Further, systemwide policy concerning campus involvement with student activities conducted off-campus was unwritten and informally communicated to campuses. In addition, chartering documentation for student organizations was inadequate, to varying degrees, at all campuses visited. For example, student organization files were incomplete or had been discarded, the availability and qualifications of club advisors were not consistently verified, club orientation records did not demonstrate attendance, and required club officer or advisor signatures were missing. ACTIVITY/EVENT MANAGEMENT [15] Documentation of activity/event authorizations for student organizations was incomplete at six of eight campuses visited. A review of activity/event paperwork showed unanswered questions on whether food would be prepared or alcohol served, no indication of insurance requirements and applicable permits or fees, and missing approval signatures such as those from the club/organization advisor or campus public Student Activities/Systemwide/Report No. 04-35 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY safety. In addition, informed consent forms for intramural sports were inadequately documented or not retained. STUDENT JUDICIARY [17] The processing of cheating/plagiarism cases in judicial affairs varied and disciplinary probations were inconsistently recorded, which adversely affects the impact/significance of disciplinary sanctions. Student Activities/Systemwide/Report No. 04-35 Page 2 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The 2003 Book of Professional Standards for Higher Education by The Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education (CAS) states that campus activities are the combined efforts of clubs and organizations established for and/or by students. CAS published these standards for educators and policy-makers based on input from multiple industry experts since approximately 1986. The most recent CAS publication (2003) contains 29 functional area standards, including campus activities, fraternity and sorority advising, judicial programs, and recreational sports programs. One stated purpose of these standards is to provide practitioners with industry best practices that any college or university program can achieve. Many auxiliary organizations in the California State University (CSU), notably the associated students and student unions, are integrally involved with student activities. The associated students typically provide funding from student body organization fees to student organizations that are chartered/recognized by the campus. Student unions develop and market programs primarily for students. Both auxiliary organizations fund or co-sponsor specific events, at which students are the primary participants. On a systemwide basis, the CSU conducts a Student Needs and Priorities Survey (SNAPS) approximately once every five years. The SNAPS includes evaluations for certain student activities-related factors, and the students are requested to prioritize functions, activities, and services in the order of importance to them, as well as assign a quality rank. There are four student activities-related factors evaluated in SNAPS as follows: Student clubs and organizations. Recreational programs and/or activities. Student union activities. Fraternities and sororities. In the 1989 SNAPS, these factors were ranked in the bottom quartile in terms of importance to the students in meeting their educational objectives. The highest quality rating was given to student clubs and organizations. In a September 2002 article entitled, “Who’s Responsible for Student Clubs?,” United Educators describes the relationship between student clubs and the institution as follows: Some institutions assume close supervision over student clubs, others take a more distant stance, and still others blend the two approaches. At the two extremes, the two approaches are sometimes termed “hands-on” and “hands-off.” In between is a hybrid model, an “arm’s-length relationship,” in which the institution controls some aspects of student activities, but leaves others

Load more