DOCSLIB.ORG

Monthly OTP July 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Monthly OTP July 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRPORTS Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This may result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG please [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES OAG Airport Monthly OTP – July 2019 Page 1 of 2 Home GLOBAL AIRPORTS – TOP 100 GLOBAL AIRPORT PERFORMANCE On-time performance GLOBAL AIRPORT PERFORMANCE On-time performance Airport Departures Rank No. flights Size Airport Departures Rank No. flights Size Panama City Tocumen Inter- ARH Arkhangelsk 97.3% 1 340 1,003 PTY 91.2% 51 5,966 149 national MSQ Minsk International Apt 96.7% 2 2,261 329 OKD Sapporo Okadama Apt 91.2% 52 419 926 SHJ Sharjah 96.3% 3 3,727 225 GFK Grand Forks 91.1% 53 180 1,173 LWY Lawas 95.9% 4 199 1,147 TKS Tokushima 90.8% 54 403 942 MKM Mukah 95.8% 5 177 1,181 HKD Hakodate 90.7% 55 765 684 OBO Obihiro 95.8% 6 310 1,025 NRN Duesseldorf Weeze Airport 90.6% 56 390 956 IWK Iwakuni 95.7% 7 186 1,161 KIJ Niigata 90.6% 57 889 620 GOJ Nizhny Novgorod 95.4% 8 549 819 SVX Yekaterinburg 90.5% 58 2,206 334 MWA Marion 95.1% 9 162 1,196 KKJ Kitakyushu 90.5% 59 1,046 548 SGC Surgut 95.1% 10 1,001 570 NKM Nagoya Komaki Airport 90.5% 60 744 699 UKB Osaka Kobe Airport 94.6% 11 1,271 483 UFA Ufa 90.3% 61 1,106 531 HNA Hanamaki 94.5% 12 390 957 AJU Santa Maria Apt 90.2% 62 475 884 MUR Marudi 94.5% 13 173 1,184 PLZ Port Elizabeth 90.2% 63 657 744 GAJ Yamagata 94.4% 14 248 1,096 PEE Perm 90.2% 64 687 723 AXT Akita 94.3% 15 655 745 KSC Kosice 90.1% 65 277 1,063 ROV Rostov 94.2% 16 1,137 518 DIG Deqen 90.0% 66 366 978 THE Teresina 94.1% 17 423 919 Sun Valley Friedman Memo- SUN 89.8% 67 215 1,128 TGU Toncontin Intl Apt 94.0% 18 678 729 rial Apt KGD Kaliningrad 93.9% 19 1,056 545 KTN Ketchikan International Apt 89.8% 68 814 653 ITO Hilo 93.8% 20 556 816 SDK Sandakan 89.7% 69 406 938 MMK Murmansk 93.7% 21 364 981 SBW Sibu 89.7% 70 682 725 Governador Jorge Teixeira de ANR Antwerp 93.6% 22 172 1,186 PVH 89.6% 71 261 1,079 Oliveira Intl Apt RKD Rockland 93.5% 23 186 1,162 YGJ Yonago 89.6% 72 191 1,152 RTW Saratov 93.3% 24 423 921 SIP Simferopol 89.6% 73 2,541 297 SIT Sitka 93.3% 25 366 979 MLA Malta 89.5% 74 2,512 304 MMB Memambetsu 93.1% 26 465 891 SEZ Mahe Island 89.5% 75 1,132 521 SUV Suva 93.1% 27 403 944 MYJ Matsuyama 89.5% 76 1,240 492 BTU Bintulu 92.9% 28 482 879 FCA Kalispell 89.5% 77 666 738 KCZ Kochi (JP) 92.9% 29 713 714 HND Tokyo Intl (Haneda) 89.5% 78 21,594 9 TJM Tyumen 92.8% 30 1,040 553 IOS Ilhéus Jorge Amado Apt 89.2% 79 223 1,119 VOG Volgograd 92.8% 31 466 890 TAK Takamatsu 89.2% 80 610 791 KUF Samara 92.7% 32 1,036 556 KMQ Komatsu 89.1% 81 824 650 ITM Osaka Intl (Itami) 92.7% 33 6,158 148 PAE Everett 88.9% 82 739 702 JNU Juneau 92.6% 34 2,270 327 Guam Antonio B Won Pat GUM 88.9% 83 918 607 KOA Kona 92.5% 35 2,237 330 International SDY Sidney 92.3% 36 156 1,200 BOI Boise 88.8% 84 2,222 332 LIH Lihue 92.1% 37 1,289 478 OMS Omsk 88.7% 85 532 836 Moscow Sheremetyevo Inter- Grand Canyon Flagstaff SVO 92.1% 38 17,320 28 FLG 88.7% 86 247 1,098 national Apt Pulliam Brasília–Presidente Juscelino NGS Nagasaki 92.0% 39 1,558 426 BSB 88.7% 87 5,208 166 Kubitschek Intl Apt YQU Grande Prairie 92.0% 40 351 993 GEG Spokane International Apt 88.6% 88 2,024 354 DNH Dunhuang 91.9% 41 515 847 SOC Surakarta (Solo) 88.5% 89 752 695 OKJ Okayama 91.9% 42 478 881 FSZ Shizuoka 88.5% 90 442 908 HIJ Hiroshima 91.8% 43 1,022 563 RSU Yeosu/Suncheon 88.5% 91 217 1,126 BLI Bellingham 91.6% 44 309 1,029 CEK Chelyabinsk 88.5% 92 624 777 AAQ Anapa 91.5% 45 1,104 532 MYY Miri 88.4% 93 1,474 442 OIT Oita 91.5% 46 1,032 558 YZF Yellowknife 88.4% 94 813 655 KZN Kazan 91.5% 47 1,300 476 UBJ Ube 88.3% 95 403 945 TOY Toyama 91.4% 48 214 1,130 GJT Grand Junction 88.3% 96 403 943 Marechal Cunha Machado SLZ 91.4% 49 618 781 Intl Apt NST Nakhon Si Thammarat 88.3% 97 372 971 Baku Heydar Aliyev Interna- LEB Lebanon/Hanover 88.2% 98 186 1,163 GYD 91.4% 50 2,095 344 tional Apt YYG Charlottetown 88.2% 99 376 964 KCH Kuching 88.2% 100 1,995 357 OAG Airport Monthly OTP – July 2019 Page 2 of 2 Home GLOBAL AIRPORTS – BOTTOM 100 GLOBAL AIRPORT PERFORMANCE On-time performance GLOBAL AIRPORT PERFORMANCE On-time performance Airport Departures Rank No. flights Size Airport Departures Rank No. flights Size HSN Zhoushan 27.1% 1,197 559 814 SOU Southampton 48.8% 1,146 1,475 441 CZX Changzhou 28.7% 1,196 1,404 456 HLD Hailar 49.0% 1,145 1,509 435 JMK Mykonos 30.8% 1,195 1,290 477 DSA Doncaster/Sheffield 49.0% 1,144 370 972 HIA Huai'an 32.6% 1,194 1,004 569 BUD Budapest 49.3% 1,143 4,875 178 MIG Mianyang 34.5% 1,193 1,579 420 NVA Neiva 49.4% 1,142 301 1,033 WUX Wuxi 34.7% 1,192 2,655 286 OLB Olbia 49.7% 1,141 2,063 348 YIW Yiwu 35.6% 1,191 724 711 LCA Larnaca 49.8% 1,140 2,805 278 EFL Kefallinia 36.0% 1,190 475 883 BHH Bisha 50.0% 1,139 176 1,183 FSC Figari 36.6% 1,189 606 794 SMI Samos 50.3% 1,138 288 1,046 SJW Shijiazhuang 36.7% 1,188 3,872 217 PDL Ponta Delgada 50.3% 1,137 1,189 503 KUM Yakushima 39.4% 1,187 217 1,124 INV Inverness 50.3% 1,136 613 786 EIN Eindhoven Airport 39.4% 1,186 1,875 372 RMU Corvera 50.6% 1,135 423 920 Moscow Vnukovo Internation- NTG Nantong 39.8% 1,185 1,427 450 VKO 50.6% 1,134 6,568 137 al Apt YTY Yangzhou 39.8% 1,184 1,029 559 Duesseldorf International DUS 51.0% 1,133 9,876 79 BMU Bima 40.0% 1,183 278 1,060 Airport PFO Paphos 40.3% 1,182 770 680 CHQ Chania 51.1% 1,132 966 590 ABT Al Baha 40.7% 1,181 162 1,198 SKP Skopje 51.1% 1,131 787 673 DYG Zhangjiajie 41.3% 1,180 1,391 460 NAP Naples Capodichino Apt 51.2% 1,130 3,791 219 TSN Tianjin 42.2% 1,179 7,597 114 NCE Nice 51.5% 1,129 7,597 115 Karlsruhe/Baden-Baden WNZ Wenzhou 43.4% 1,178 3,914 213 FKB 51.7% 1,128 447 904 Baden Airpark SWA Shantou 43.8% 1,177 2,547 296 LYA Luoyang 52.1% 1,127 631 768 FIH Kinshasa N'Djili Intl Apt 44.1% 1,176 460 899 PSA Pisa 52.1% 1,126 1,989 359 XFN Xiangyang 44.2% 1,175 911 613 LJU Ljubljana 52.2% 1,125 1,071 539 CIF Chifeng 44.2% 1,174 912 611 ZIH Ixtapa/zihuatanejo 52.4% 1,124 263 1,077 RHO Rhodes 44.4% 1,173 1,942 363 ELH North Eleuthera 52.4% 1,123 392 953 LIS Lisbon 44.6% 1,172 10,147 76 SXB Strasbourg 52.5% 1,122 782 674 BRU Brussels Airport 44.7% 1,171 9,587 84 LYG Lianyungang 52.6% 1,121 792 671 ZTH Zakinthos Island 45.1% 1,170 813 654 TER Terceira 52.7% 1,120 648 757 JTR Thira 45.5% 1,169 1,468 446 LZH Liuzhou 52.8% 1,119 677 730 BAV Baotou 45.5% 1,168 897 617 OPO Porto 52.8% 1,118 4,389 197 PAS Paros 45.6% 1,167 348 995 ZHA Zhanjiang 52.8% 1,117 1,173 509 AJA Ajaccio 45.9% 1,166 916 608 MCY Sunshine Coast 52.8% 1,116 427 916 NGB Ningbo 46.3% 1,165 3,706 226 BEG Belgrade 52.9% 1,115 3,035 267 JJN Quanzhou 46.4% 1,164 2,678 284 JNX Naxos Is 53.0% 1,114 252 1,089 YNT Yantai 46.5% 1,163 4,024 211 NKG Nanjing 53.0% 1,113 10,007 78 ZUH Zhuhai 46.7% 1,162 4,040 210 MXP Milan Malpensa Apt 53.0% 1,112 9,652 82 KGS Kos 46.7% 1,161 1,171 511 RTM Rotterdam Apt 53.6% 1,111 872 625 KWI Kuwait 47.1% 1,160 5,175 168 CGQ Changchun 53.9% 1,110 4,383 198 BIA Bastia 47.1% 1,159 943 600 MHH Marsh Harbour 53.9% 1,109 496 865 ATH Athens (GR) 47.2% 1,158 11,534 61 DXB Dubai International 54.1% 1,108 15,975 35 MAN Manchester (GB) 47.4% 1,157 9,027 90 HER Irakleion 54.3% 1,107 3,051 264 CFU Kerkyra 47.7% 1,156 1,515 434 SPU Split 54.5% 1,106 2,347 318 DIR Dire Dawa 47.9% 1,155 193 1,151 HGH Hangzhou 54.7% 1,105 11,872 58 PIX Pico Island 47.9% 1,154 171 1,187 WMT Zunyi 54.7% 1,104 849 636 LGW London Gatwick Apt 48.0% 1,153 13,007 52 MFM Macau (MO) 00 54.8% 1,103 3,232 251 MLO Milos 48.1% 1,152 189 1,154 DLA Douala 54.9% 1,102 753 693 BHX Birmingham Airport 48.1% 1,151 4,485 191 NYO Stockholm Skavsta Airport 55.3% 1,101 696 719 AYT Antalya 48.2% 1,150 7,286 120 EXT Exeter (GB) 00 55.4% 1,100 676 731 HOR Horta 48.5% 1,149 270 1,072 ISB Islamabad 55.4% 1,099 1,420 453 DAT Datong 48.6% 1,148 577 807 BOH Bournemouth 55.5% 1,098 210 1,138 HET Hohhot 48.6% 1,147 5,686 152 OAG Airport Monthly OTP – July 2019 Page 1 of 20 Home GLOBAL AIRPORTS - FULL LIST GLOBAL AIRPORT PERFORMANCE On-time performance Airport Departures Rank Cancellation % No.
Recommended publications
  • Cheil Industries Stronger Is the Unconventional Challenges

    Cheil Industries Stronger Is the Unconventional Challenges

    year in review in year unconventional challenges and our responses What makes Cheil Industries stronger is the unconventional challenges. We continued to move forward when competitors were at a standstill, and worked on making the company better while others were solely focused on external growth. Cheil Industries looks to push boundaries and seeks challenges and innovation even in times of great uncertainty. This Corporate Report is a record of what Cheil Industries has done in the past, and how we have responded to crisis by taking full advantage of opportunities and boldly adopting changes. It is also a commitment to growth in the future, so that Cheil Industries can join with all of our stakeholders in becoming a stronger, better company. 03 Cheil Industries Corporate Report 2011 year in review in year we are original strong no future creative without a past Cheil Industries’ 57 year history has built a company of immense experience. The company has always upheld a strong set of values, resulting in today’s growth and success. This is an introduction to the history of Cheil Industries – a history which also serves as the basis for the core values that will shape our future. 04 05 Cheil Industries Corporate Report 2011 1954 Cheil Woolen Fabrics Industries founded ns I 1956 Commenced plant operations and manufactured Korea’s first combed yarn Beg year in review in year 1961 Launched Korea’s first textile exports (1954~1968) 1965 Became the first Korean business to secure a license to use the WOOL trademark A Journey 1969 Became the
  • York Aviation Contents

    York Aviation Contents

    The Economic Impact of Arrivals Duty and Tax Free Shopping in the EU European Travel Retail Confederation September 2020 York Aviation Contents York Aviation Contacts Originated by: James Brass Partner Page T. +44 (0)7767 455614 E. [email protected] 1. Key Points 2 Matthew Jones Senior Consultant 1. Introduction 6 T. +44 (0)1625 614051 E. [email protected] 2. How would arrivals shops affect the market? 8 3. Estimating the economic impact of arrivals shops 10 4. Country Case Study: Spain 14 5. Country Case Study: Italy 20 6. Country Case Study: Germany 26 7. Potential Impact Across the EU 32 York Aviation is the trading name of York Aviation LLP, registered in Cardiff, No. 0C307526. Registered Office: Smithfield House, 92 North Street, Leeds, LS2 7PN Disclaimer of Liability Although every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the material and the integrity of the analysis presented herein, York Aviation LLP accepts no liability for any actions taken on the basis of its contents. York Aviation LLP is neither authorised nor regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority or the Prudential Regulation Authority. Anyone considering a specific investment should consult their own broker or other investment adviser. York Aviation LLP accepts no liability for any specific investment decision, which must be at the investor’s own risk. Copyright Copyright © 2020 York Aviation LLP. All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part may be used or reproduced without permission. 1 York Aviation Key Points York Aviation Key Points The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on the European air transport industry and its partner sectors.
  • Green Korea 2003 Green Korea 2003 Towards the Harmonization of Humans and Nature

    Green Korea 2003 Green Korea 2003 Towards the Harmonization of Humans and Nature

    Green Korea 2003 www.me.go.kr Green Korea 2003 Towards the harmonization of humans and nature As the eaves in silhouette whisper our traditional beauty, the imagery opens a view of modern Korea where the past meets the future in harmony with nature. A View of the Han River Published by International Affairs Office, Ministry of Environment Government Complex Gwacheon, Jungangdong 1, Gwacheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 427-729, Republic of Korea Ministry of Environment Tel. (822) 504-9244 Fax. (822) 504-9206 Republic of Korea This brochure uses recycled paper. Contents Preface ......................................................................................................2 Special Reports Environmental Vision of the Participatory Government ............................4 Environmentally Friendly World Cup ....................................................... 6 UNEP 8th Special Session of the Governing Council in Korea ...............10 Major Environmental Policies Development and Promotion of Environmental Technology ....................12 The Environmental Industry .......................................................................16 Environmental Education .........................................................................20 Preservation of the Natural Environment ...............................................22 Natural Gas Bus for Clear and Clean Sky .................................................26 Water Quality Management .......................................................................30 Management of Drinking Water
  • GS Energy Brochure Download

    GS Energy Brochure Download

    Company Introduction COPYRIGHT © 2012 GS ENERRGY. All RIGHTS RESERVED GS Energy Profile p.03 Subsidiaries p.04 Business Portfolio Refining & Petrochemicals p.05 Gas & Power p.07 Exploration & Production p.12 Green Growth p.14 GS Energy R&D Center p.18 Financial Information p.19 Contact Us p.20 History p.21 COPYRIGHT © 2012 GS ENERRGY. All RIGHTS RESERVED Corporate Profile GS Energy was incorporated on January 3, 2012 as a result of GS Holdings’ spinoff of GS Caltex, its refining, marketing, chemicals and transportation arm, creating a new independent Korean energy company. Subsequently, GS Energy assumed the high growth businesses previously operated by GS Caltex including, exploration & production and renewable energy operations. Further, by acquiring GS Caltex’s electric & gas utilities operations, GS Energy has solidified its position as an integrated energy-specialized holding company. Value chain integration and operational agility are fundamental to GS Energy’s long term growth strategy. GS Energy is organized into four interrelated segments: Exploration & Production, Refining & Petrochemicals, Gas & Power and Green Growth. Our integrated business model allows us to capture synergies among our different segments and activities. Our upstream businesses include the development of oil & gas projects across the globe, from the Middle East to the Americas and Southeast Asia. Further downstream, GS Energy is currently constructing a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal in South Chungcheong Province to optimize value chain integration and to ultimately provide a steady flow of electric power and gas to customers through various subsidiaries and affiliates. Furthermore, given our focus on sustainable growth, we have been actively developing our technical know-how in the alternative energy sector.
  • Aena Magazine Rich.Indd 11 21/5/07 18:15:12 12 347332392383475498774709909029989935499

    Aena Magazine Rich.Indd 11 21/5/07 18:15:12 12 347332392383475498774709909029989935499

    An official report for the aviation community. 3 Contents P.4 Javier Marin Director of Spanish airports Madrid Barajas A national asset P.8 José Manuel Hesse The ‘architect’ of Plan Barajas Award-winning P.27 Architectural design Maria Dolores Izquierdo P.33 P.11 Retail – every case is different Plan Barcelona The engine of Catalonia Innovation in IT P.38 P.17 First-rate, in-house expertise The Malaga plan A benchmark for tourist airports A three-way partnership P.20 Air navigation, airlines and airports The Levante Plan P.41 Alicante and Valencia Security P.24First, last and always Canarias plan P.47 The lucky airports P.51 4 Madrid Barajas Spain’s window on the world Airport Business asked Aena’s director of Spanish airports Javier Marin to spell out the significance of Plan Barajas, including the award-winning Madrid Barajas Terminal 4. John Frank-Keyes reports. “ 5 adrid Barajas is absolutely vital for air transport in Spain because of its hub function. However, we faced significant capacity limitations, so these infrastructure developments were crucial – and not just for Madrid, but for Spain and indeed for Europe. We now have the capacity to move up from being Europe’s fifth-ranked airport, and indeed it is something we have been able to achieve as we are now fourth in the first quarter of 2007,” Marin replied. Previously, Barajas had hourly runway capacity of 78 movements per hour with passenger mgrowth of about 8% a year. “The full benefits of the new capacity have really been felt with the advent of the winter season when we have been able to offer 90 movements per hour.
  • European Commission

    European Commission

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION MEMO Brussels, 23 July 2014 State Aid: further details on Commission decisions regarding public financing of airports and airlines in Germany, France and Austria (See also IP/14/863). Today, the Commission has taken six decisions under EU state aid rules with regard to public aid measures to airports and airlines relating to three airports in Germany (Dortmund, Leipzig/Halle and Niederrhein-Weeze) and three airports in France (Angoulême, Pau Pyrénées and Nîmes). It has also extended the scope of its formal investigation in relation to Klagenfurt airport in Austria. Since the beginning of 2014, the Commission had already finalised its assessment in eleven other cases concerning public aid measures to airlines and airports.1 Public interventions in companies carrying out economic activities can be considered free of state aid within the meaning of EU rules when they are carried out on terms that a private player, operating in a market economy, would have accepted (the market economy operator principle – MEOP). If the MEOP is complied with, the measure confers no advantage to the company and therefore involves no state aid. If the MEOP is not complied with, the measure involves state aid and the Commission then examines whether it can be found compatible with the EU's Single Market. This means that the Commission checks whether the measure complies with common EU rules that allow granting aid for projects furthering goals of common interest, such as EU transport or cohesion policy objectives, under certain conditions. The assessment criteria for public interventions in airports and airlines are set out in the Commission's Aviation Guidelines, adopted in February 2014 (see IP/14/172, MEMO/14/121 and, for more details, policy brief.
  • Scalability of the Air Transportation System and Development of Multi-Airport Systems: a Worldwide Perspective

    Scalability of the Air Transportation System and Development of Multi-Airport Systems: a Worldwide Perspective

    Scalability of the Air Transportation System and Development of Multi-Airport Systems: A Worldwide Perspective by Philippe A. Bonnefoy B. Ing., Mechanical Engineering, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada, 2002 S.M., Aeronautics & Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005 Submitted to the engineering systems division in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2008 2008 Philippe A. Bonnefoy, All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT the permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author: ______________________________________________________ Philippe A. Bonnefoy Engineering Systems Division May 30th 2008 Certified by: _____________________________________________________________ R. John Hansman, Professor Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Certified by: _____________________________________________________________ Cynthia Barnhart, Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Certified by: _____________________________________________________________ Richard de Neufville, Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Certified by: _____________________________________________________________ Amedeo Odoni, Professor Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Civil and Environmental Engineering Accepted
  • Truth and Reconciliation� � Activities of the Past Three Years�� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �

    Truth and Reconciliation Activities of the Past Three Years

    Truth and Reconciliation Activities of the Past Three Years CONTENTS President's Greeting I. Historical Background of Korea's Past Settlement II. Introduction to the Commission 1. Outline: Objective of the Commission 2. Organization and Budget 3. Introduction to Commissioners and Staff 4. Composition and Operation III. Procedure for Investigation 1. Procedure of Petition and Method of Application 2. Investigation and Determination of Truth-Finding 3. Present Status of Investigation 4. Measures for Recommendation and Reconciliation IV. Extra-Investigation Activities 1. Exhumation Work 2. Complementary Activities of Investigation V. Analysis of Verified Cases 1. National Independence and the History of Overseas Koreans 2. Massacres by Groups which Opposed the Legitimacy of the Republic of Korea 3. Massacres 4. Human Rights Abuses VI. MaJor Achievements and Further Agendas 1. Major Achievements 2. Further Agendas Appendices 1. Outline and Full Text of the Framework Act Clearing up Past Incidents 2. Frequently Asked Questions about the Commission 3. Primary Media Coverage on the Commission's Activities 4. Web Sites of Other Truth Commissions: Home and Abroad President's Greeting In entering the third year of operation, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea (the Commission) is proud to present the "Activities of the Past Three Years" and is thankful for all of the continued support. The Commission, launched in December 2005, has strived to reveal the truth behind massacres during the Korean War, human rights abuses during the authoritarian rule, the anti-Japanese independence movement, and the history of overseas Koreans. It is not an easy task to seek the truth in past cases where the facts have been hidden and distorted for decades.
  • Transmission-SA-2015 Web.Pdf

    Transmission-SA-2015 Web.Pdf

    Special edition 2015 Consulting professionals Intercultural competence: a portrait of three staff members from the DFS sales and consulting division PHOENIX passes World Cup test Brazilian ANSP uses DFS system Optimised approaches lead to fuel savings Cooperation with airlines pays off Made by DFS Success across the globe Editorial Dear reader The public usually sees air traffic control as a func- key to resolving many issues faced by our clients and tion of the State that ends at its border. However, this partners across the globe. is no longer an accurate reflection of reality – at least not in every case. Many air navigation service provid- We hope you enjoy reading our magazine. ers (ANSP) have built up a sizable body of knowledge from decades of operations which they are looking to market across their borders. On the other hand, many ANSPs are looking to make the expertise gained by others their own. DFS, for example, has controlled one of the most complex airspaces in the world for decades. We set up a dedicated division to market our systems, products and experience worldwide. Our Aeronautical Solutions division has been very suc- cessful in this field for quite some time now. Take, for instance, our products and services such as the air traffic control systems AMAN and PHOENIX which have been deployed from Asia to South America. Our highly motivated team at Aeronautical Solu- tions (AS) have twenty years of experience in pro- viding consulting services across many different cul- tures. The AS portfolio includes support services in airspace planning, safety management and the instal- lation of air traffic control systems.
  • DPI Implementation Progress for Advanced ATC TWR Airports

    DPI Implementation Progress for Advanced ATC TWR Airports

    DPI Implementation Progress for Advanced ATC TWR Airports First Developme Locally DPI NEW Phase | DPI Operational Information nt of DPI- Implemente Operational Perc Full name Airport Evaluation Exchange ICD d at NMOC traffic UKBB KBP Mar-2011 Mar 20122 Apr 2012 May 2012 29/05/2012 0,56% Boryspil Int Airport - Kiev EDDG FMO Sep-2012 Oct 2012 Dec 2012 Jan-Feb 2013 25/03/2013 0,09% Muenster Osnabrueck Int Airport EDDW BRE Sep-2012 Oct 2012 Dec 2012 Jan-Feb 2013 25/03/2013 0,15% Bremen Airport EDDC DRS Sep-2012 Oct 2012 Dec 2012 Jan-Feb 2013 25/03/2013 0,10% Dresden Airport EDDE ERF Sep-2012 Oct 2012 Dec 2012 Jan-Feb 2013 25/03/2013 0,02% Erfurt Airport EDDR SCN Sep-2012 Oct 2012 Dec 2012 Jan-Feb 2013 25/03/2013 0,04% SaarBruecken Airport EGLC LCY Nov-2013 Nov 2013 mid 2014 Mid 2014 05/05/2015 0,43% London City EGPD ABZ Nov-2013 Nov 2013 mid 2014 Mid 2014 05/05/2015 0,26% Aberdeen EGCC MAN Nov-2013 Nov 2013 mid 2014 Mid 2014 05/05/2015 1,03% Manchester EGSS STN 01/11/2013 Nov 2013 mid 2014 Mid 2014 17/07/2015 1,01% Stansted EGGW LTN 01/11/2013 Nov 2013 mid 2014 Mid 2014 17/07/2015 0,72% Luton EGPF GLA 01/11/2013 Nov 2013 mid 2014 Mid 2014 17/07/2015 0,43% Glasgow EGPH EDI 01/11/2013 Nov 2013 mid 2014 Mid 2014 17/07/2015 0,67% Edinburgh LEAL ALC 01/11/2015 Feb 2016 Q2 2016 Q2 2016 23/08/2016 0,51% Alicante Airport EGGP LPL 01/04/2015 april 2015 Jul 2016 Q3 2016 19/12/2016 0,20% Liverpool GCTS TFS 01/11/2015 april 2015 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 04/05/2017 0,35% Tenerife South Airport LEMG AGP 01/11/2015 april 2015 mid 2017 mid 2017 05/09/2017 0,72% Malaga
  • Regional Airports: Runways to Regional Economic Growth?

    Regional Airports: Runways to Regional Economic Growth?

    Regional airports: runways to regional economic growth? Evaluating the role of regional airports as regional economic catalysts in Europe Felix Pot 2018 REGIONAL AIRPORTS: RUNWAYS TO REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH? Evaluating the role of regional airports as regional economic catalysts in Europe A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for obtaining the degree of Master of Science in Economic Geography Felix Pot June 2018 University of Groningen Faculty of Spatial Sciences Supervisors: dr. S. Koster prof. dr. P. McCann Co-reader: prof. dr. J. van Dijk Preface The front cover of this thesis captures many elements why studying regional airports is so interesting. It features an aerial view of M¨unsterOsnabr¨uck International Airport in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The airport is very representative for many regional airports across Europe. Founded by the British army as a military landing strip in the nineteen-fifties, the airport expanded along the way by constructing a modern passen- ger terminal building as well as a 2,000 metres long runway facilitating modern mid-size commercial aircraft as soon as commercial opportunities arisen. Due to its location in an aesthetic and quiet rural area, every attempt to expand the airport has been met with great criticism from local residents fearing growing negative externalities such as nuisance. Public debates on infrastructure planning and funding are often dominated by rather sub- jective arguments, possibly unnecessarily exposing many people to negative externalities. For regional airports this debate is particularly interesting as their core function of con- necting people is often under-exposed, while their supposed role in generating economic benefits is dominating the debate.
  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea

    Democratic People's Republic of Korea

    Operational Environment & Threat Analysis Volume 10, Issue 1 January - March 2019 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED OEE Red Diamond published by TRADOC G-2 Operational INSIDE THIS ISSUE Environment & Threat Analysis Directorate, Fort Leavenworth, KS Topic Inquiries: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: Angela Williams (DAC), Branch Chief, Training & Support The Hermit Kingdom .............................................. 3 Jennifer Dunn (DAC), Branch Chief, Analysis & Production OE&TA Staff: North Korea Penny Mellies (DAC) Director, OE&TA Threat Actor Overview ......................................... 11 [email protected] 913-684-7920 MAJ Megan Williams MP LO Jangmadang: Development of a Black [email protected] 913-684-7944 Market-Driven Economy ...................................... 14 WO2 Rob Whalley UK LO [email protected] 913-684-7994 The Nature of The Kim Family Regime: Paula Devers (DAC) Intelligence Specialist The Guerrilla Dynasty and Gulag State .................. 18 [email protected] 913-684-7907 Laura Deatrick (CTR) Editor Challenges to Engaging North Korea’s [email protected] 913-684-7925 Keith French (CTR) Geospatial Analyst Population through Information Operations .......... 23 [email protected] 913-684-7953 North Korea’s Methods to Counter Angela Williams (DAC) Branch Chief, T&S Enemy Wet Gap Crossings .................................... 26 [email protected] 913-684-7929 John Dalbey (CTR) Military Analyst Summary of “Assessment to Collapse in [email protected] 913-684-7939 TM the DPRK: A NSI Pathways Report” ..................... 28 Jerry England (DAC) Intelligence Specialist [email protected] 913-684-7934 Previous North Korean Red Rick Garcia (CTR) Military Analyst Diamond articles ................................................