The Friends of Evil: When Ngos Support Genocidaires

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Friends of Evil: When Ngos Support Genocidaires The Friends Of Evil: When NGOs support genocidaires Tom Ndahiro 2013 2 Contents 1 Refugees’ Camps under the Military 7 1.1 Road map . 8 1.2 Taking the lead . 9 1.3 Strategic decisions . 10 2 The FAR’s Vision for the Future 17 2.1 Scenarios for the return of refugees . 18 3 Refugees in captivity 27 4 The RDR or disguised genocidaires 33 5 How to wage continued genocide and terrorism 55 6 When racial hatred is fashionable 63 7 Complicity between the NGOs and the genocidaires 75 8 Rwandan civil society in exile–villains posturing as victims 89 9 Other initiatives of Rwandans living in Exile 101 10 Fast moves from European NGOs to rehabilitate felons 127 11 A Club of Lovers of Hatred 139 12 Carrero, a Mockery to the Nobel Peace Prize 147 13 Indifference to the demons of race 159 14 Final Appeal and Conclusion 167 3 4 CONTENTS Foreword “Friends of Evil” will be a troubling surprise for anyone who believes — as most probably do in North America and Europe -– that the 1994 Rwanda genocide is a thing of the past and a lesson learned for the international community. The book is based on extensive new research and documentation which will be a revelation even to Rwanda experts. The first part shows how in 1994-95 the “Hutu Power” perpetrators of the genocide, allowed by the international community to regroup in eastern Congo, reorganized themselves behind a new organization called the RDR, and developed their military and political strategy to return to power in Rwanda. Genocide denial was a central element of that strategy, as was the goal of gaining reentry into Rwandan political life. The second part shows the extraordinary degree to which Western “civil society,” and particularly several NGOs in Europe, have been complicit in this genocidal strategy. But perhaps all this should not be a surprise at all. The attitude of Europe and North America toward Rwanda during the preparation and implementation of the 1994 genocide against the Tutsis ranged from the active complicity of French authorities and media to the passivity and feckless “humanitarianism” elsewhere. This attitude stemmed from indifference, ignorance and no doubt an element of racist arrogance. These are deep-rooted and stubborn habits, easy to revert to once Western establishments processed the shock of 1994 through hand-wringing regret and partial admissions of guilt. It is hard for genocide perpetrators to face up to their crimes. It is also hard for their abettors and the bystanders to move beyond whatever arguments or narratives serve to lessen their responsibility. This helps explain the tolerance and the space given to exponents of Hutu Power ideology and genocide denial in Europe and North America since 1994, by governments, media, human rights organizations and NGOs. But is does not make it acceptable. This book is both an education and an appeal for Europe and North America to do better: to put an end to impunity, and to confront the racist ideology that still threatens to sabotage the emergence of a new and peaceful Rwanda. The scores of known Rwandan perpetrators in Europe (especially France) and North America need to be tried or extradited to Rwanda. Their armed forces in eastern Congo need to be definitively defeated. Their ideological sympathizers and supporters need to be silenced. Holocaust denial is not tolerated in Europe and North America, but denial of the genocide of the Tutsis is. This is morally wrong. It is also strategically wrong. The future of Germany is assured. The future of Rwanda is still at stake. 5 6 CONTENTS Richard Johnson Chapter 1 Refugees’ Camps under the Military The pre-genocide government army (FAR) were very instrumental in the plan- ning and execution of the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda. Apart from prepar- ing the killing machinery before the death of president Habyarimana on April 6, 1994, it was the army which instated the “interim government” that would supervise the genocide. Judging from the range of testimonies by the survivors, witnesses and perpetrators of this odious crime, every major massacre of Tutsis was committed with the involvement of the military, since they were the ones to provide arms and supervise their use. After the defeat of their government, as will be shown in this chapter, the military remained in charge of the political landscape across the borders in Zaire. On September 29, 1994, Major-General Augustin Bizimungu sent to Bukavu a “Highly Confidential” meeting report to “His Excellency the President of the Republic of Rwanda (Theodore Sindikubwabo) and “The Honourable Prime Minister” (Jean Kambanda). The report was about a seven day meeting of senior officers in the Rwandan Armed Forces High Command, held in Goma from on September 2-8, 1994.1 The content of this report, demonstrates clearly that the origin and the actual foundation of the now quite wide-spread Rwandan genocide ideology, genocide denial, and double genocide theories is to be found within the circles of the army High Command. What was planned, before April 1994 and in September 1994, is very apparent today. In this retreat, with a view to achieving return to Rwanda, the RAF “delved into the analysis of the reasons for their defeat so as to propose strategies for a political or military solution to the Rwandan problem”.2 The first reason given was a “lack of a common political and military perspective in operational plans.” They said the conduct of operations was often influenced by politicians, rather than the army. That was the reason why they were determined not to make the 1Prosecution Exhibit n° P457B tendered in court on 12 December 2006, in case n° ICTR- 98-41-T.The original text which is in French was a 49 page document (plus source). I used the English text, as a translated version by the ICTR. With court references WS06-339 (E) KO04-1476-K004-152. 2K0370577. 7 8 CHAPTER 1. REFUGEES’ CAMPS UNDER THE MILITARY same mistakes again. The RAF decided they would firmly control the political- military organization that would become the RDR. The high command decried “naive faith in the Arusha Peace Accords,” which they said were a creation of “RPF henchmen, and half-heartedness in the imple- mentation of the said Accords which led to the acceptance of the RPF in Kigali without control.”3 In the document the FAR blamed almost everybody, starting with what they termed as ‘UNAMIR’s complicity with RPF’, the ‘involvement of foreign countries in the conflict: Uganda, Belgium, USA, Burundi and Tanzania’, ‘the sudden change of mind on the part of France, which was their main and only sure military partner’ and ‘UN’s military and diplomatic embargo against Rwanda followed by a misdirection of unofficial supply channels to avoid the embargo.’ They admitted having internal problems including poor organization, a lack of personnel and lack of leadership. “Lack of a national defence policy and lack of structures that are suited to all the echelons of command led to ineffi- ciency in the conduct of the operations.” (. ) “The ideological training of our men was not guaranteed despite internal political contradictions.” There were logistical problems including “a glaring shortage of senior staff at all levels. it was NOT possible to have soldiers with adequate qualifications for the posts of command and execution” and a “lack of reserves linked to the planning of recruitment. it was not possible to move from the temporary defensive state to offensive operations.” Another thing was “Weakness of some senior officers and loss of the Rwandan Armed Forces leaders on 6 April 1994, which caused some hesitation in decision-making and a succession struggle, while RPF continued to benefit from the initiative.” And, “Erosion of discipline at all levels without a corresponding system of sanctions.” Finally, the RAF again blamed their internal division on an external force, claiming there was a “presence of RPF allies within the Government and the Rwandan Armed Forces.”4 1.1 Road map Opening the meeting, the chairman, Gen. Bizimungu, said the army had entered Zairian territory with all the country’s institutions. He said the purpose of their meeting was “to assess the political and military situation in order to reflect on how to identify and explain the root causes of our present situation and to devise a common strategy on how to resolve the problems facing our soldiers in particular and the people of Rwanda in general.” Indeed this meeting was to change the course of events. Bizimungu said it was a “must” to do some “serious self-evaluation and a thorough analysis of the situation as a whole so as to use the lessons learned in future undertakings.” One thing he felt was obvious was that “the people and the Army felt “humiliated” by the situation and were “flagrant in the eyes of the foreigners”. The army, he said, faced several difficulties: the lack of housing, food, and medicine well as dispersal of military rank and file and decision- makers. The RAF’s Chief said the Armed Forces were “no longer functioning.” 3K0370600. 4K0370600. 1.2. TAKING THE LEAD 9 Explaining this, he said the officers and other officials in the administration acted more as individuals and not collectively. Among other things, he said, there was a problem of “the embargo imposed on our country; domestic politics and regionalism; the RPF army made up of Ugandan Army elements with the support of its sponsors; the international community’s poor understanding of the Rwandan problem; the complicity of UNAMIR and that of other powers, etc. ” There was a need to have “operatives in Rwanda” and to provide the mil- itary personnel in refugee camps with training and ideology.
Recommended publications
  • Yellow Star, Red Star: Holocaust Remembrance After Communism'
    H-Judaic Rice on Subotić, 'Yellow Star, Red Star: Holocaust Remembrance after Communism' Review published on Monday, June 29, 2020 Jelena Subotić. Yellow Star, Red Star: Holocaust Remembrance after Communism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2019. Illustrations. 328 pp. $29.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-5017-4240-8. Reviewed by Monika Rice (Gratz College) Published on H-Judaic (June, 2020) Commissioned by Barbara Krawcowicz (Norwegian University of Science and Technology) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=54856 Holocaust commemoration as an expansion of Holocaust memory studies entered scholarship in the 1990s with the seminal works of Tom Segev (The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust [1991]), James Young (The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning in Europe, Israel, and America [1993]), and Peter Novick (The Holocaust in American Life [1999]). Michael Steinlauf’s groundbreaking work on Holocaust memory in Eastern Europe, Bondage to the Dead: Poland and the Memory of the Holocaust (1996), complemented these works that dealt, mostly, with Western and Israeli Holocaust remembrance. Since then, the field of Holocaust memory has proliferated in the last two decades, transforming the Holocaust from an event remembered as committed by specific historical agents (Germans and their collaborators) to a symbol of universal evil.[1] The memory of the destruction of European Jews, or, perhaps, its postmemory (considering that its carriers are second and third postwar generations), has acquired cosmopolitan and global qualities, which involve its “universalization, de-territorialization, decontextualization and mediatization.”[2] Surprisingly not included in this globalized trend of Holocaust memory are the countries of Eastern Europe, where the mass murder of the Jews took place.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Modern Rwanda Through Photos
    The History of Modern Rwanda through Photos PHOTO LINKS WITH HISTORICAL DESCRIPTIONS DIRECTIONS: The photo URLs and accompanying historical descriptions listed below are the basis for the photo/ time line activity in The History of Modern Rwanda through Photos lesson plan. See Procedure 1 in the lesson plan for procedural options for student use of the photos/descriptions. 1. Ethnic Differentiation between Hutus and Tutsis, 1920’s http://modernhistoryproject2012.wordpress.com/history-of-hutu-tutsi-relations/ (First illustration, right side) The racist eugenics movement was popular in the United States and Europe in the 1920’s and 1930’s. It is this racism by European powers that influenced the interactions with Africans. Racism was the filter by which Bel- gian scientists, interested in understanding the nature of the relationship between the Hutu (75% majority) and the Tutsi (15-20% minority), measured heads, noses, skin color, height and body shape in an attempt to explain “scientifically” why the Tutsis were a “superior” tribe. The Belgian scientists concluded after their “re- search” that the Tutsis had European features, and this explained why they held the power despite being in the minority. This process brought institutional racism into Rwanda. 2. Tutsis Fled Ethnic Violence After Independence, 1959-1962 http://bengal.missouri.edu/~smwgz8/history.htm (Second image, first photo on page) Tutsis fled Rwanda after the Hutus rose to power and the resulting violence between the two groups when the Tutsi-led monarchy was overthrown. Over 150,000 Tutsis fled the country to Uganda and Burun- di, and those remaining in Rwanda were barred from political office after the 1962 constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • ) 1 W~ Mathias Marcuss~
    ;) 1 W~ MATHIAS MARCUSS~ INTERNATIOI\AL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RvVANDA ;.'- CASE NC J.:TR 19"; THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIB UNAL l~.·~'--'~l~C:-T ~~ AGAINST RECEIVED HASSAN NGEZE ,'; ;-, ~", 1" ~ 7 _, .....',~! V v ACTION :e..e",=,~~ COpy ~ ~ Il\DICTMENT I. The do;;eCcor ufthe International Criminal Tribun,j for Rwanda, pursuant to the authority stipulated in Article 17 of the Statute of the TribllfJaI 01' the L'lternational Crim: al Tribunal for Rwanda (the Statute oEthe Tribunal) charges Hi SSAN {GEZE with GENOCIDE, DIRECT ANi) PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO COMMIT CENOCll ~, and CRIM.!!:S AGAINST HUMANITY, all offenses stip:llated in Articles 2.ud 3 0 the Statut.: of the fribunal as set forth belo N: 2, THE ACCUSED HASSAN NGEZE was born in 1961 in the Commune of Rubavu, Prefecture of Gisenyi, ,he Republic of 'Zwand At the tim.: of the eV~:lts referred to in this indictment, HASSAN NGEZE was Editor-in-Chief of the .i' 'lirna: knewn :.IS, and published under tbe name ot~ KANGURA. PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/085c26/ 3. CONCISE STATENIENT OF THE ACTS 3.1. The crimes inthislnd';tmentr)l\! plse in Rwsnda, between January 1 and December :3 1 of 1994. 3.2. During the events n:rerred to III this indictment, Tutsis and Hutus were identified as ethnic or racial group<;. 3.3. DLL inlS the events referre, in thi' indi . (ment, there were in Rwanda \\idespre.d or sy ~ematic ,ttacL '1gain-t a civilian population, including Tutsis and certa:n 1{utus, Oil poliucal, etl lie or l'acial grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • A European Cooperation Programme
    Year 32 • Issue #363 • July/August 2019 2,10 € ESPAÑOLA DE InternationalFirst Edition Defence of the REVISTA DEFEandNS SecurityFEINDEF ExhibitionA Future air combat system A EUROPEAN COOPERATION PROGRAMME BALTOPS 2019 Spain takes part with three vessels and a landing force in NATO’s biggest annual manoeuvres in the Baltic Sea ESPAÑOLA REVISTA DE DEFENSA We talk about defense NOW ALSO IN ENGLISH MANCHETA-INGLÉS-353 16/7/19 08:33 Página 1 CONTENTS Managing Editor: Yolanda Rodríguez Vidales. Editor in Chief: Víctor Hernández Martínez. Heads of section. Internacional: Rosa Ruiz Fernández. Director de Arte: Rafael Navarro. Parlamento y Opinión: Santiago Fernández del Vado. Cultura: Esther P. Martínez. Fotografía: Pepe Díaz. Sections. Nacional: Elena Tarilonte. Fuerzas Armadas: José Luis Expósito Montero. Fotografía y Archivo: Hélène Gicquel Pasquier. Maque- tación: Eduardo Fernández Salvador. Collaborators: Juan Pons. Fotografías: Air- bus, Armada, Dassault Aviation, Joaquín Garat, Iñaki Gómez, Latvian Army, Latvian Ministry of Defence, NASA, Ricardo Pérez, INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY Jesús de los Reyes y US Navy. Translators: Grainne Mary Gahan, Manuel Gómez Pumares, María Sarandeses Fernández-Santa Eulalia y NGWS, Fuensanta Zaballa Gómez. a European cooperation project Germany, France and Spain join together to build the future 6 fighter aircraft. Published by: Ministerio de Defensa. Editing: C/ San Nicolás, 11. 28013 MADRID. Phone Numbers: 91 516 04 31/19 (dirección), 91 516 04 17/91 516 04 21 (redacción). Fax: 91 516 04 18. Correo electrónico:[email protected] def.es. Website: www.defensa.gob.es. Admi- ARMED FORCES nistration, distribution and subscriptions: Subdirección General de Publicaciones y 16 High-readiness Patrimonio Cultural: C/ Camino de Ingenieros, 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Women and Gender in Conflicts
    SPANISH MINISTRY OF DEFENCE STRATEGIC DOSSIER 157-B SPANISH INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES (IEEE) GRANADA UNIVERSITY-ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND COMBINED CENTRE (MADOC) THE ROLE OF WOMEN AND GENDER IN CONFLICTS June 2012 GENERAL CATALOGUE OF OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS http://www.publicacionesoficiales.boe.es Publishes: SECRETARÍA GENERAL TÉCNICA www.bibliotecavirtualdefensa.es © Author and Publisher, 2012 NIPO: 083-12-253-3 (on line edition) NIPO: 083-12-252-8 (e-book edition) Publication date: February 2013 ISBN: 978-84-9781-801-8 (e-book edition) The authors are solely responsible for the opinions expresed in the articles in this publication. The exploitation righits of this work are protected by the Spanish Intellectual Property Act. No parts of this publication may be produced, stored or transmitted in any way nor by any means, electronic, mechanical or print, including photo- copies or any other means without prior, express, written consent of the © copyright holders. SPANISH SPANISH INSTITUTE FOR MINISTRY STRATEGIC STUDIES OF DEFENCE Workgroup number 4/2011 THE ROLE OF WOMEN AND GENDER IN CONFLICTS The ideas contained in this publication are the responsibility of their authors, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the IEEE, which is sponsoring the publication CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Soledad Becerril Bustamante Chapter I EQUALITY AND GENDER. BASIC CONCEPTS FOR APPLICATION IN THE FIELDS OF SECURITY AND DEFENCE M.ª Concepción Pérez Villalobos Nuria Romo Avilés Chapter II INTEGRATION OF THE PERSPECTIVE OF GENDER INTO THE
    [Show full text]
  • The International Response to Conflict and Genocide:Lessom from the Rwanda Experience
    The International Response to Conflict and Genocide: Lessons from the Rwanda Experience March 1996 Published by: Steering Committee of the Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda Editor: David Millwood Cover illustrations: Kiure F. Msangi Graphic design: Designgrafik, Copenhagen Prepress: Dansk Klich‚, Copenhagen Printing: Strandberg Grafisk, Odense ISBN: 87-7265-335-3 (Synthesis Report) ISBN: 87-7265-331-0 (1. Historical Perspective: Some Explanatory Factors) ISBN: 87-7265-332-9 (2. Early Warning and Conflict Management) ISBN: 87-7265-333-7 (3. Humanitarian Aid and Effects) ISBN: 87-7265-334-5 (4. Rebuilding Post-War Rwanda) This publication may be reproduced for free distribution and may be quoted provided the source - Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda - is mentioned. The report is printed on G-print Matt, a wood-free, medium-coated paper. G-print is manufactured without the use of chlorine and marked with the Nordic Swan, licence-no. 304 022. 2 The International Response to Conflict and Genocide: Lessons from the Rwanda Experience Study 2 Early Warning and Conflict Management by Howard Adelman York University Toronto, Canada Astri Suhrke Chr. Michelsen Institute Bergen, Norway with contributions by Bruce Jones London School of Economics, U.K. Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda 3 Contents Preface 5 Executive Summary 8 Acknowledgements 11 Introduction 12 Chapter 1: The Festering Refugee Problem 17 Chapter 2: Civil War, Civil Violence and International Response 20 (1 October 1990 - 4 August
    [Show full text]
  • RAPPORT DE LA COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE D'enquete SUR LES VIOLATIONS DES DROITS DE L'homme AU RWANDA DEPUIS LE 1Er OCTOBRE 1990 (7 - 21 Janvier 1993)
    EMBARGO -. 8 MARS 1993 11:00 RAPPORT DE LA COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE D'ENQUETE SUR LES VIOLATIONS DES DROITS DE L'HOMME AU RWANDA DEPUIS LE 1er OCTOBRE 1990 (7 - 21 janvier 1993). RAPPORT FINAL FEDERATION INTERNATIONALE DES AFRICA WATCH (New York, DROITS DE L'HOMME – FIDH Washington, London) (Paris) UNION INTER-AFRICAINE DES DROITS CENTRE INTERNATIONAL DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ET DES PEUPLES - DE LA PERSONNE ET DU UIDH (Ouagadougou) DEVELOPPEMENT DEMOCRATIQUE - CIDPDD / ICHRDD (Montréal) 1 Mars 1993 La mission d'enquête internationale qui fait l'objet du présent rapport a été organisée à la demande de la société civile rwandaise, s'exprimant notamment par la voix des associations rwandaises de défense des droits de l'homme (Association pour la Défense des Droits de la Personne et des Libertés Publiques - ADL, Association Rwandaise pour la Défense des Droits de l'Homme - ARDHO, Association des Volontaires de la Paix - AVP, et Ligue Chrétienne de Défense des Droits de 'Homme - LICHREDOR, regroupées dans le Comité de Liaison des Associations de Défense des Droits de l'Homme - CLADHO ; ainsi que KANYARWANDA -Association pour la promotion de l'Union par la justice sociale). Elle a été réalisée avec le concours des institutions et organisations suivantes : Agir ensemble pour les Droits de l'Homme, Centre de Promotion des Droits de l'Homme (CPDH), Centre National de Coopération au Développement (CNCD), Comité pour le Respect des Droits de l'Homme et la Démocratie au Rwanda (CRDDR), Commission des Communautés Européennes (CCE), European Human Rights Foundation, Ligue des Droits et Libertés du Québec, Nationaal Centrum voor Ontwikkelings-Samenwerking (NCOS), NOVIB.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Politics and the Rwandan Crisis
    Third World Quarterly, Vol 24, No 3, pp 479–493, 2003 Body politics and the Rwandan crisis ERIN K BAINES ABSTRACT Since the Rwandan genocide of 1994, scholars and policy think- tanks have produced an impressive number of macro-level studies and theories to explain the seemingly inexplicable: how and why did this happen? Yet these studies, most often based on ethnic and/or global level analyses, tend to simplify complex social relations at the local level which likewise contributed to the genocide. This article examines ‘micro-level’ testimonial evidence collected in human rights reports to shed light on one particularly under-theorised realm and approach, that of gender and the politics of the body. I suggest that the 1994 genocide was an extreme attempt not only to purge the ‘Hutu nation’ of the Tutsi, but also to actively engender a vision of the ‘Hutu nation’ in the minds of an otherwise diverse and fragmented local populace. Women’s bodies, gender and sexuality became highly contested terrains for scripting this vision of an imagined nation. It is the human body that serves as the ultimate tablet upon which the dictates of the state are inscribed.1 Since the Rwandan genocide of 1994, academics and policy think-tanks have produced an impressive number of macro-level studies and theories to explain the seemingly inexplicable: how and why did this happen?2 Up to 800 000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu murdered in just three months. Parallel to this literature, journalists and human rights groups have documented in meticulous detail the specifics of the genocide: who was involved, what was their plan and how this plan was implemented.3 These literatures are less than theoretical, but they are rich in ‘micro-level’ empirical evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rwandan Genocide: Combating Stereotypes And
    The Rwandan Genocide: Combating Stereotypes and Understanding the Origins Nicola Skakel Senior Honors Thesis Department of History April 9th 2018 Defense Committee: Dr. Susan K. Kent, Department of History, Primary Advisor Dr. Matthew Gerber, Department of History, Honors Council Representative Dr. Paul Shankman, Department of Anthropology, Advisor 1 Introduction On the 7th of April 1994, the small east African country of Rwanda erupted into one of the most deadly and intimate genocides the modern world had ever witnessed. Whilst the western world stood by and watched in just 100 days over 800,000 Rwandans out of a total population of 7 million, were systematically murdered in the most brutal and violent of ways. Those who were targeted made up the country’s minority ethnic group the Tutsis, and moderates from the majority group, the Hutus. For many, the legacy of Rwanda is a monstrous example of extreme pent up ethnic tensions that has its roots in European colonialism. In contrast, I will argue that the events not just of 1994 but also the unrest that proceeded it, arose from a highly complex culmination of long-standing historical tensions between ethnic groups that long pre-dated colonialism. In conjunction, a set of short-term triggers including foreign intervention, civil war, famine, state terrorism and ultimately the assassination of President Habyarimana also contributed to the outburst of genocide in 1994. Whilst it would be easy to place sole responsibility on European colonists for implementing a policy of divide and rule and therefore exacerbating ethnic tensions, it seems to me that genocide is never that cut and dried: it can never be explained by one factor.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Context
    Historical Context: On April 6, 1994, Hutus began slaughtering the Tutsis in Rwanda, Africa. As the brutal Genocide took place, the world stood idle and watched the massacre take place. The Rwandan Genocide, also known as the genocide against the Tutsi, lasted 100 days and the brutal, barbaric mass killings left approximately 800,000 Rwandans dead. Who Are the Hutu and Tutsi? Key Facts, Thoughts The Hutu and Tutsi are two peoples in Africa who share a common past (i.e., & Questions language, religion, beliefs, etc.). When Rwanda was first settled, the people who lived in the region raised livestock; the people who owned the most cattle were called "Tutsi" and everyone else was called "Hutu." The Tutsi were the minority upper class and the Hutu majority, were generally considered to be lower class; however, social mobility was possible. If a Hutu acquired more than 10 cattle or received a dowry of cattle through marriage, they could easily change categories and become a Tutsi. What Impact Did Colonialism Have on the Hutu and Tutsi? German’s colonized Rwanda in 1894. Upon their arrival, they began to make ethnic distinctions between the three groups: The Hutu, the Tutsi and the Twa (a small group of hunter-gatherers who also live in Rwanda). The German’s favored the Tutsi because they felt that they embodied more European features and characteristics such as lighter skin, lighter eyes, longer noses and a thinner and taller physique. Because of this, German rulers gave special status to Tutsis. They put Tutsis in roles of responsibility and authority because they deemed them superior to Hutus.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide POLI 120N: Contention and Conflict in Africa Professor Adida
    POLI 120N: Contention and Conflict in Africa Professor Adida Genocide What is genocide? • Coined in 1943 by Jewish-Polish lawyer Raphael Lemkin: • genos = race/tribe in Greek • cide = to kill in Latin • December 1948: UN Convention on Genocide • Defines genocide as “any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such: killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about group’s physical destruction in whole or in part, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.” UN Genocide Convention Examples Hereros and Namaquas by German colonialists Armenians by Ottoman Empire Examples Jews by Nazi Germany Tutsis by Hutus Naming • Genocide in Rwanda • Genocide in Darfur Genocide in Rwanda • April-June 1994: 800,000 Rwandans killed in 100 days • Most of the dead: Tutsi • Most of the perpetrators: Hutu Rwanda: precolonial background • Tutsi (14%), Hutu (85%), Twa (1%) • Socio-economic status: cattle-wealth • Stratified social hierarchy Rich in cattle Tutsi Subordinate Hutu Rwanda: colonialism and independence • Political dominance of Tutsi monarchy, even before colonization • Colonial rule (German and Belgian): monarchy continued; forced Hutu labor; violence against Hutu; Hamitic hypothesis • Hutu mobilization in 1950s; PARMEHUTU vs. UNAR • 1961: Hutu Revolution: Hutu overthrow monarchy and establish Hutu power; persecute Tutsi
    [Show full text]
  • Satcen Annual Report 2020
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS SatCen SatCen European Union Satellite Centre Tel. +34 91 678 60 00 Fax: +34 91 678 60 06 e-mail: [email protected] Postal address: Apdo. de Correos 511, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain www.satcen.europa.eu Additional information on the European Union is available on the internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021. ISBN 978-92-95034-19-8 doi 10.2820/940883 © SatCen, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Spain. Printed on white chlorine-free paper. This report is published in accordance with Article 7 of the COUNCIL DECISION 2014/401/CFSP of 26 June 2014. Excma. Sra. Doña Margarita Robles Fernández at SatCen, 05 November 2020 H.E. Ms Florenceat Parly,SatCen, French 24 September Minister of 2020 the Armed Forces Rear Admiral Fabio Agostini (Italian Navy), Commander of Operation EUNAVFOR MED IRINI at Satcen, 01 July 2020 Major General Michel Friedling, French Space Commander at SatCen, 17 September 2020 Visit of UME delegation to SatCen, 07 July 2020 Visit of HR/VP24 Josep February Borrell 2020 to the Centre on TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNUAL REPORT 2020 | SatCen 3 Foreword by the Director intelligence analysis. Highly skilled and multidisci- plinary teams analyse heterogeneous data at mul- tiple classification levels in a secure environment. The Centre’s fields of activity are broad and inclu- sive, covering all features, activities and phenom- ena related to security that can be analysed and monitored from space (security from space).
    [Show full text]