DOCSLIB.ORG

Kangura 27 Special

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kangura 27 Special Ubwanditsi hwa KANGURA buramamaza lshyaka P.D.R. (Parti Dknocratiqur pour la Reiolution). Tumaze kubona ko rubanda nyamwinshi ikrncyr ishyka ryayo riyigeza kuri Demokarasi nyayo. rikayitoza kwivugirr nn kuvudra abadafitc aho havugira. dusabye abanyarwanda bose mu madini gose. kuyoboka P.D.R. Iry shyaka ritangiranye abayoboke benshi mu Rwanda, crane cyme abushgigikiye ibitekeiezn bya Dr. KAYIBANDA Gr6goire. byo kurenpera inyungu za ruhanda nyamwinshi. n'ibitekerezo bya HABYARIMANA, ~.eushyigikiye amahoro n'amajyatnbere. Abashaka kuba mu buyobori br'iruo shywku. n'abifuza ibisobanurii ku buryo hurambuye,nimuhaze GISEYYI-IYFORMATION B.P. I9 GISEW'I. ryqwaR.P. 1312 KIGALI. Amahurnerr. te7o iryo shyaka rizagenderaho ubu arimo aratrgurwa n'akanama kahixohereymo. ITmuco wu kupry si uu'abany~rwsnda.Muzi ncza ko hari abashinlishwa no kuvuga ko zcmhi ntacyo zakozc. yaba ipa HABYARtMANA yaba nlyn KAYIBAKDA. Twehwr icy'inpni ni ugushima ibyakorwe n'abategetsi b'u Rwanda kuva twipakururn ingoma ya gihake tukarebcra hamwc ukuntu ibyiza h!akorwr bgakon~erwa. Ahaxagana iryo shyaka rero muzaze muzi ko tudashinzwr pusehanya no kuba bantamunnea. Muze tmunganire abatuhanfiri.ie muri Politiki. n'aharanpijc akar; k'ubusirikarr. N~iryoishyaka ryanyu. ahahwe kivupira nahahwirs iki! KUBERA KO BIMA7.E KI'GARAGARA KO ABATUTSIBOMU BLIGANDA - RWANDA - ZAYIRE NO MI7 BIrRl?NDI BfFIlZ.4 KZTDITTEGEKA BABINYIfJIdE MI'KI CORRIDOR-HIMA. HAGOMBA ABAHUTU BENSHI BAKWIB17MBIRA MIIRI P.D.R. PARMEHLITZT. BYABA NGOMBWA JRYO SHYAKA RIGAKORANA NA PA1,IPEHI:Tl~ YO MU BURUNDI. BITYO ABAHUTU BOSE BAKABONA AH0BAVVCJRA. NTIBAKOMEZE KWJCWA URUBOZO. IlKIMARA GUSOMA IYI KANGLIRA. HtTA UBARIZA AH0 USANZWE TTGURIRA IBIKYAMAKURU HARI KANGI-RA KO 27 SPECIAL CYANGWA NIBA UFITE SPECIAI. MZJ NTOKI ZAWE. SABA KANGIIRA No 27 UTARAGURA KI:KO ZASOHOTSE ZOSE ARJ EBYIRI. ESE UBUNDI HARI HABUZE IKI NGO xilibcshya. ahuhwo ni ukuramtnya hafi y'umupaka. msre zikarasa uhuraari n'uhu,itanpc biranga ibisasu muri Uganda. abarumet ingabo 7% Rwanda. kimwc n'ukuntu ha Uganda nabo hakahapwa abanyarwanda bore hakunda ahandi henshi bagakomereka. amahoro. bakaha ntq na rim^ Ubwo ngo inyemi yikaba zizeye bashobora gucihwa intege n'ihyo i7.0 ko rkumvisha I.eta )'a Uganda nyangarwanda riri kubakorera. ngo ko ibyo biri gukorwa n'inpabo Z'u ITANGA1.0 RY'l'Bl'YOBO'Zl bibagirwt ko lrta ).b Rwanda ikora Rwanda. ibyn bimazc gukorwa BW'IBIREBAKA ?S't7RI'GAMBA uko ishohoye kwnp amahoro ahe MI' h'C.4BO Z'I' RWANDA. yagaruka \*ha mu gihus. kmsbi. ndetse no mu minsi khize wqie kummya kn i7o Nycnri- Aho nwho naho rero. inyen7i nkotsnyi 7aba rararashe mu ~irebvenen rasanp 7iri ptsindwa. muiyi wa Gisoro muri Uganda kuko ibyo hikorwa byore hn@pfs icbvntu brnshi abandi 1. Mu7i mu,nc kn igihueu c?.acu b).'ubu$ome ?in gutorera canc bagakomcreka. Npn lari zizeye cyateue n'umwawi uturutv mu cvanc abaturaee b'in7irakarenpane. ko Iqaboia Vpnda pihiia 7ilcra pihuy cya LG.4NOA. ku itariki ?a ntacyo bite7e'kurigwaho na pato. u Rwanda, 7agira apace mhere fUkunkira 1990. Inpbo rb zigamrira zikamsigamo Inyewi- 1) Rwanda uhwn ?arueanpinkundura. 3. K~amarainyenri-nkotanyi nri~isiha nkmanyi. rikisubirira iuabo. hanycma 1igaru7a umupakh :uhimbz amayere. kupm upo rirebe wigihuca Faru. L1bwrr hari rariki ?a ko zapere ku ntepriyemeic ariyo yo c) lbyo bywe rero murabona ko 30 7'llkwakin 1990. Ku~aicy0 $he eufata uhutrpctsi mu Rwanda. Dorc nlacyn byashohnye kurigezaho: Inqwi-nkotanyi rakomeie gushaka nk'uhu inzcp ?a gisilikat? rishiwwe nip mpamvu lnyenri-nkotanyi rrrctu. irndi mutwc, ibyo bikaba uttmiu /akwi$arurira asare k\l iperere~azakoze uko rirhoboyc neo R\w,nda, ukn kaba kangdna kouc.. rish~borekuvumbura ayo meyere bimzzc n'igihe. kandi rikaba kupira n~orihwire amahanga ko ziri mashya y'inyenzi. none rashoboye zizeye ko wo ngo utarapfube. mu Rwanda. Ingabo rL Ruanda kulatahum. lukaba waxtnr: eri Muti uwn mutwe uicye ulc? 7akome.je kuba maso. nho i?o nyenri ngombwa kuyapera ku batura- Urebye ni programu ndcnde ritandiy 7ikababwa. rikisubirira rwande bosc. kupra ngo n2ba kandi ifitc ihyiciro byiwhi. ariko aho 7.ik mu6 Csnda. ubwabo bi\wnvire ayo mayerc byove hiean~i!c gufiarha in-wnri- y'urnwanri. ariko cyanecyane ku~ira ntesn:~twlh~ira uhutcgetsi. 2. Umvanri rero parminxue nta shili. nee baiye bamenya uko bapomba kubyifararno. kandi barushebo Dore u'rn hitcyc: n'ubwo igihupu cya Uganda I" l+cirn cpmhcrr kwari gikomeie kumushyigikira. Nyamara gufashe ingabo 7'u Rwanda n'irindi nrcpn rishinzwe umurekano. ugushinga mu Rwanda ibinya- kandi )anre kumera ko .wtsinrw. makuru bimwe byigenga, akaba akirora ko amfata u Rwanda. kuburizamo ayo mayere yilmwdn7i Inyenzi-nkotanyi. likoresheje ~ifashishiieinkunga ahabwa udashaka kuva ku kima. Umwxnli ibyitso byaro. rikajya ~ihibwira n'igihup =a Uganda. Kupm ngo rero amre kubona atsinrvr ku ibyb higomba kwandika. i7o ashoborc kugern kuri iyo utepo y2. mgamba m'amawsu, rigiriye inama nyandiko tandi zikaba rigamije umkwi yahinduyc uburyo hwc yo pukoresha uhundi humpe. Dore 1) cyanc cyaRc pusebya ubulegctd hvn pukora inramhara: niso rero programu nshya y'umwanzi. bwb RW.no gueengera mpannu ubu yirinwe am= ibisasu nk'uko imi7.e purahunva nipcrerera ibitckerezo bishyigikira ahn inpbo racu lishinre ibirindiro. ry'inpbn t'u Ruanda : umara*. Upw no pushinp ryanpwa se mu baturape a) Kuminjira iksu ku ngabn r2r ibyo binymakuru. Inyenri- b'ln,irakarenpne. lbyo bisasu kandi Rwanda. inyen7.i rikrcw muri nkoranyi%vfazhena bimwe mu akabyohcre7.a yibrreyc muri Uganda. n$o kupira ngo ingabo binyimekuru byigenga byari Uganda. Mwakun-re kubyumva 7acu r.irakare maze 7ambuLc bisanzweho. 7ishoramo amafa: ktnshi mu mamdiyo yanyu. lkindi umupaka. nnncho .Lct~ ya ranCa menshi. ma7.e nabyo Inwnri-nkotanyi zigambiriye. ni Uganda ~VUF iti: dore u Rwanda bibisaba gukorana naro. ukritwikira ijoro likinjira mu rwateyt. nuneho inpbo 7a fcyo cyiciro cya mhere Rwanda. ripmije kwiba. kwica Uganda ribonemha gutabara. cyapweho. kuko umuntu wex abaturagc se. cyangwa bamwr ?.ifashe noneho ku mupraparo mhisho7a ntiya~indakubona ko rikabatwara zikabsjyana iyo. muri Inyenri-nkownyi. koko ihinyamakuru bimw na I.;panda. rabapayo nabo dkabica. leyo ni icyambere. bimwe bishyigikiye ku mugara- lyo izo nycnzi zikora ibyo. ngo b) Icya kabiri. lnytn~itimarc gar0 umwanri. lbyo bimkorwa rib rishaka kunanira abaturape kubona ingabo racu 7ifashc kandi byihishc inyuma n'inpbo racu. kugh npo nab0 sikanga puhubuka. ratttSt ybburcngmzira bwa bun muntu . bitakane Leay'uRwanda barup ko umucwe mare ziga ubundi bwo kwandiKa no kuruga icy0 ashaka. bar&mhixei ' Nyamara rero aho bugome bukabije. Zigahasaarara muri2 nmabaiondi:,&&&i hap,; niire kdi rwcsc turapishyipi- ha nahi. knpir9 ' &&.hakore kive. nyamara kandi n'uhwo ibikorwa hyiahu@#bkFr&ahije. tutabona kimwe inzira nkn ku-ihr hakor&heje'intwamm twanyuramo kugira ngo ari hyhiiyana no kwihr Xu& tuhoncre umuti ihiha~n np halerhe ahaturap umutwe hirwugarijc ahanyanvanda twsr n-sax mu pihqu hare ' akadu- tngvmha puknmen ku humwc ni:ayii~ hsacli, rtrpomhn kuvupa mmwv Rir!:n. n~~.oin:;t.nri zirircra ko kuri ixi ntambara Inycnri- ahrlurr~cba~atinda kwivu- nl;okn\i ?a:uroshyemo. mhapatsn:;-. h~vtrge kn ?i?arnara siko tuhiimna ubu uhu!egcrri huriho ntacyo aphu! lo amashynka amw huh~msn?z. kuko hudahosh n%m\~c2rsp rllmwc n'unlwaarl irul, !etnhr~>hr! ry'inyenzi udutcm.. iyo heri abanvarwmdi? ,1sh\as!1\.*. hamwc w bamwr babohotrn nhamndim-wp hsbn hahitirany 7.,.,. 1 -... Wi~ih:igti. mu gihc ahan7i 1;:;ak;:ri h'u Rwanda 3" Mu e::iriro cya ~3tx:t. hnuka annusri ku hasilikari mingn ashpk:. ik~nc hncv nv iu haltwag baturiyc r:!sh:+5kin ibyerckr.!? nmoko umtrpaka w'u Rwanda n2 ntlrcr ma?< ;!lrnn:;. I:gallda. kandi hakahirntirwu hr~a'nhii-araino. 'n:;!n-bar;! (hakihiahimir~a\ na banme mu ik=:,,::\ g, I...'. >.L,$ll hzig:i. ,??h,> sihugu.aban7i h'u Rwmda. haha uvrwr!r: 3k1px 37.r~n!-:r<i.!. habibona hikabatera inpufu nCn'nuir:a ;.rn;~'n.rnp .ni; Ihirlill hugakomerr/aho~ . 3t::bw nkxvh-:i Iyahu npmara twa\ugap pikirc ns'nnhtlr~, r~nhlnh:. i!i rumwe kuri iryo hihalo nt!!mh;ln ~2~lrtx?h:*llw~y h'v cy'intamhar:!, r?mu,anli aha Ruund;!. K::.?::? :I;<% :::n-s:.w j.aratsinzw ruhcnu kuva kcra. agcz'e Luri it,, CI:LZA :,.iI;ehiex Al-iko iyir IIWO nwanri ilbuna ko c.oinrnhn b);i hiiikorl~iuitiht5. arrtarsri sknrerlia hann mu nro hibirirwi! hy~nyiikp phugu yileshirhe ibyirso byc n:!l!, a:\:lh~k:53 amupcza ku byn agamije. 11.c!'!ilgua ?.', akomcm kugira ic!' '~xre.ma7e ha~rt! \';!b:<hu?~! nhhntr!tri. ibintu by-amara ku7mnba. bigcre i?,insuil hili ,ih;~n;afidi~~:! iwa Sdnhaga agafata ipihugu. n'ahalatsi bararcnpanx muri iki apasubira abanyarwanda ku pihugu. n'ibir!di n'ibindi ... lhy A, a) Npay rero. banyarwanda. hanyarwandakati. amaperi neoyi. Hano mu eihugu rero hari h!.@\c ntahaod: hiri ~utwuka.ni bnrnue mu havandimwe bacu programme ndendc v'lnscn7i- umwanri a-'amahoro yatangiye gukoresha nk'uko abshinme barimo gufasha umwanri ku~era nknlan!-i n'aha7ichvipikiye. kuri iyo ngirwa mugambi. ipererela hehivumbuye. 4" Ic?iciro c'a kane kirrha I:mwan7.i arashaka pukwira- ) Dusabye reroabavandimwe bacu inpbo 7.u Rwanda. k~:ir>mu ~ihtlpuumwks mubi b'abanyarwanda bore kwima ('muan~inpu ayanpa ih~oaknr; ultlrutqe ku mutekano muke. amatui no kwamaganira kure hyow nruho ?an,ura ingah', 1.1 ki!sirn n:o abanyarwanda ayo mayeri y'~1mwan7i. kupira Rwanda. Tiyo mpamvu npc ba~anpire kuryana basubira- n.eo baragwa mu murego apomba n:~l;orz ilko :~~hoh~i?c namm ma-rc umxran7.i abone uko ratcpuranpae f amayeri akari7anamo amacaluhiri. ahiniiran?. ahanitsd uhuhanpa buhanitsc akarirc7a ihitangara. kandi hupsmijc pufata ubutegetei aka7.umvirha ko raha rilhshrc hl limwanri arskoresha'amashyaka hitanyu7.e mu n7ira ya nahi. male ~ikaharacika intcpe. ya pnlitiki ku~irango ayifatire dcmokarasi abanyarwanda akarihoncra aho. Llha hakaha rimkc rimur. mare ken kabaye hviyemeie. hari ihyifsnngo b?iriraa hisheka wat-inde intamhara atashoboye abaririkare hitemhere7a mri putrinda akoresheie inrwaro. Ibi d) Nta n'umw ubu.ii.iwe kugaragaza marnodoka bibacenpcramo ihyo rwose amashyaka agomba ibitekerezo bye no kubitanpza bitekerem.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ) 1 W~ Mathias Marcuss~
    ;) 1 W~ MATHIAS MARCUSS~ INTERNATIOI\AL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RvVANDA ;.'- CASE NC J.:TR 19"; THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIB UNAL l~.·~'--'~l~C:-T ~~ AGAINST RECEIVED HASSAN NGEZE ,'; ;-, ~", 1" ~ 7 _, .....',~! V v ACTION :e..e",=,~~ COpy ~ ~ Il\DICTMENT I. The do;;eCcor ufthe International Criminal Tribun,j for Rwanda, pursuant to the authority stipulated in Article 17 of the Statute of the TribllfJaI 01' the L'lternational Crim: al Tribunal for Rwanda (the Statute oEthe Tribunal) charges Hi SSAN {GEZE with GENOCIDE, DIRECT ANi) PUBLIC INCITEMENT TO COMMIT CENOCll ~, and CRIM.!!:S AGAINST HUMANITY, all offenses stip:llated in Articles 2.ud 3 0 the Statut.: of the fribunal as set forth belo N: 2, THE ACCUSED HASSAN NGEZE was born in 1961 in the Commune of Rubavu, Prefecture of Gisenyi, ,he Republic of 'Zwand At the tim.: of the eV~:lts referred to in this indictment, HASSAN NGEZE was Editor-in-Chief of the .i' 'lirna: knewn :.IS, and published under tbe name ot~ KANGURA. PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/085c26/ 3. CONCISE STATENIENT OF THE ACTS 3.1. The crimes inthislnd';tmentr)l\! plse in Rwsnda, between January 1 and December :3 1 of 1994. 3.2. During the events n:rerred to III this indictment, Tutsis and Hutus were identified as ethnic or racial group<;. 3.3. DLL inlS the events referre, in thi' indi . (ment, there were in Rwanda \\idespre.d or sy ~ematic ,ttacL '1gain-t a civilian population, including Tutsis and certa:n 1{utus, Oil poliucal, etl lie or l'acial grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rwandan Genocide: Combating Stereotypes And
    The Rwandan Genocide: Combating Stereotypes and Understanding the Origins Nicola Skakel Senior Honors Thesis Department of History April 9th 2018 Defense Committee: Dr. Susan K. Kent, Department of History, Primary Advisor Dr. Matthew Gerber, Department of History, Honors Council Representative Dr. Paul Shankman, Department of Anthropology, Advisor 1 Introduction On the 7th of April 1994, the small east African country of Rwanda erupted into one of the most deadly and intimate genocides the modern world had ever witnessed. Whilst the western world stood by and watched in just 100 days over 800,000 Rwandans out of a total population of 7 million, were systematically murdered in the most brutal and violent of ways. Those who were targeted made up the country’s minority ethnic group the Tutsis, and moderates from the majority group, the Hutus. For many, the legacy of Rwanda is a monstrous example of extreme pent up ethnic tensions that has its roots in European colonialism. In contrast, I will argue that the events not just of 1994 but also the unrest that proceeded it, arose from a highly complex culmination of long-standing historical tensions between ethnic groups that long pre-dated colonialism. In conjunction, a set of short-term triggers including foreign intervention, civil war, famine, state terrorism and ultimately the assassination of President Habyarimana also contributed to the outburst of genocide in 1994. Whilst it would be easy to place sole responsibility on European colonists for implementing a policy of divide and rule and therefore exacerbating ethnic tensions, it seems to me that genocide is never that cut and dried: it can never be explained by one factor.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Rwanda Media Experience After The
    IMS assessment mission: The Rwanda media experience from the genocide International Media Support • Report • March 2003 Monique Alexis, IMS Consultant Ines Mpambara, Co-director of Rwanda’s School of Journalism Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................. 3 1.1 Background for the mission .............................................................................3 1.2 Mission Objectives..........................................................................................3 1.3 Method and Scope of work ..............................................................................3 1.4 Structure of the report....................................................................................4 2 The Rwandan Context............................................................... 5 2.1 Political background .......................................................................................5 3 The media and the genocide ................................................... 10 3.1 Historical development of the Rwandan media before the genocide .................... 10 3.2 The media during the genocide: the hate media............................................... 14 4 The media after the genocide ................................................. 19 4.1 Reconstruction of a destroyed media sector (1994 - 2003)................................ 19 4.2 Today: Absence of pluralism and constant threats and pressures ....................... 20 4.3 The new Press Law and the High Press Council
    [Show full text]
  • ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Historica Upsaliensia 264
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Historica Upsaliensia 264 Utgivna av Historiska institutionen vid Uppsala universitet genom Margaret Hunt och Maria Ågren Cover Photo: Nyamata Church, Rwanda Photographer: Ben Curtis, Associated Press Cover Layout: Kerri Sandell Olov Simonsson God Rests in Rwanda The Role of Religion in the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Geijersalen, Thunbergsvägen 3P, Uppsala, Friday, 14 June 2019 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor R. Scott Appleby. Abstract Simonsson, O. 2019. God Rests in Rwanda. The Role of Religion in the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda. Studia Historica Upsaliensia 264. 312 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-513-0655-1. This study analyses the role of religion in the Rwandan genocide, providing new explanations to the complex dynamics of devaluation and victimisation processes in genocidal violence. The thesis explains how religion was used in different contexts prior to, during, and after the 1994 genocide. The following questions guide this study: What kinds of religious concepts and arguments were used in the context of the Rwandan genocide, and how? Why were they used and what did these concepts and arguments mean? Finally, did the meanings of the religious arguments change over time and between different contexts, and if so why? Texts from three sources were analysed: the Hutu extremist propaganda in Kangura magazine and in RTLM broadcasts, and testimonies from the ICTR trials. The analysis was guided by Roger Dale Petersen’s theory on Fear, Hatred, and Resentment, as well as theories on devaluation, social identity, self-victimisation, and competitive victimhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Ethnic Marriages, the Survival of Women, and the Logics of Genocide in Rwanda
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 2 Issue 3 Article 4 November 2007 Inter-ethnic Marriages, the Survival of Women, and the Logics of Genocide in Rwanda Anuradha Chakravarty Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp Recommended Citation Chakravarty, Anuradha (2007) "Inter-ethnic Marriages, the Survival of Women, and the Logics of Genocide in Rwanda," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 2: Iss. 3: Article 4. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol2/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Interethnic Marriages, the Survival of Women, and the Logics of Genocide in Rwanda Anuradha Chakravarty Department of Government, Cornell University This article focuses on the gendered dimensions of the genocide in Rwanda. It seeks to explain why Tutsi women married to Hutu men appeared to have better chances of survival than Tutsi women married to Tutsi men or even Hutu women married to Tutsi men. Based on data from a field site in southwest Rwanda, the findings and insights offered here draw on the gendered, racial, and operational dynamics of the genocide as it unfolded between April and July 1994. Introduction In September 1992, a military commission report in Rwanda officially defined the ‘‘main enemy’’ as ‘‘Tutsis from inside or outside the country’’ and the ‘‘secondary enemy’’ as ‘‘anyone providing any kind of assistance to the main enemy.’’1 Since the invasion of Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) rebels in 1990, extremist propaganda had focused on the immutable racial distinction between Hutu and Tutsi.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and the Genocide in Rwanda
    Gender and the Genocide in Rwanda This book examines the mobilization, role, and trajectory of women rescuers and perpetrators during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. While much has been written about the victimization of women during the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, very little has been said about women who rescued targeted victims or perpetrated crimes against humanity. This book explores and analyzes the role played by women who exercised agency as rescuers and as per- petrators during the genocide in Rwanda. As women, they took actions and deci- sions within the context of a deeply entrenched patriarchal system that limited their choices. This work examines two diverging paths of women’s agency during this period: to rescue from genocide or to perpetrate genocide. It seeks to answer three questions: First, how were certain Rwandan women mobilized to parti- cipate in genocide, and by whom? Second, what were the specific actions of women during this period of violence and upheaval? Finally, what were the tra- jectories of women rescuers and perpetrators after the genocide? Comparing and contrasting how women rescuers and perpetrators were mobilized, the actions they undertook, and their post- genocide trajectories, and concluding with a broader discussion of the long- term impact of ignoring these women, this book develops a more nuanced and holistic view of women’s agency and the genocide in Rwanda. This book will be of interest to students of gender studies, genocide studies, African politics and critical security studies. Sara E. Brown is a Fellow at the USC Shoah Foundation – The Institute for Visual History and Education, and has a PhD in Comparative Genocide Studies from Clark University, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Postcolonial Politics of Militarizing Rwandan Women an Analysis of the Extremist Magazine Kangura and the Gendering of a Genocidal Nation-State
    Minerva Journal of Women and War Volume 2, Number 2 / Fall 2008 / pp. 44–63 ISSN 0736-718X (Print) / ISSN 1935-9209 (Online) DOI: 10.3172/MIN.2.2.44 / © 2008 McFarland & Co. The Postcolonial Politics of Militarizing Rwandan Women An Analysis of the Extremist Magazine Kangura and the Gendering of a Genocidal Nation-state GEORGINA HOLMES Abstract: Rwanda has been used by many feminist scholars of international relations as a case study to play out understandings of gender-based violence in war and “civil war.” Few femi- nists have analyzed the mass rape of Rwandan women in the context of a carefully planned and prepared genocide. This article considers the ways in which, in the years leading up to April 1994, the Rwandan nation-state became increasingly militarized and masculinized. It exam- ines the extremist propaganda magazine Kangura’s use of cartoons to militarize Rwandan women—not just as wives, mothers and prostitutes—but as political subjects. Keywords: feminist international relations theory; genocide; genocidal rape; media; militarization; nation-state; propaganda; Rwanda Introduction Between April and July 1994, an estimated 250,000 Rwandan Tutsi and moderate Hutu women were raped, gang-raped, and mutilated during the Rwandan genocide, when nearly a million men, women and children were killed in one hundred days. Witnesses and sur- vivors have repeatedly testified to the brutality of these rapes by the government army, mili- tia groups, and men and boys from the women’s own communities. Some testimonies report other Rwandan women’s complicity in rape—by telling men where women were hiding, goading men to rape, even disabling victims so that they could not physically escape rape.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Responsibility of Journalists Under International Criminal Law: the ICTR Experience
    NORD 73,3_f3_306-323 12/16/04 4:41 AM Page 307 Nordic Journal of International Law 73: 307–323, 2004. 307 © 2004 Koninklijke Brill NV. Printed in the Netherlands. Criminal Responsibility of Journalists under International Criminal Law: The ICTR Experience ALEX OBOTE ODORA* 1. Introduction Within a few months after the invasion of Rwanda by the Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF) in October of 1990, President Habyarimana and his senior advi- sors knew that the RPF had been reduced by losses during the first months to a number less than half that of the Rwandan army.1 The Rwandan government and military leaders also knew that their own army was backed by several hun- dred highly trained and well-armed French troops.2 However, President Habyarimana and his advisors, with the support of the media, exaggerated the risk in hopes of increasing political support for themselves.3 Historical conflicts between the two major ethnic groups, the Hutu and Tutsi, formed the basis of Habyrimana’s anti-Tutsi propaganda campaign.4 Propagandists, who included journalists, echoed and magnified the anti- Tutsi hatred and suspicion perpetrated by Habyarimana and officials around him, the so-called Akazu.5 Under the cover of the freedom of expression, jour- nalists and propagandists blared forth messages and disseminated, at first more discreetly by government officials and party functionaries, and later openly inflammatory information such as many of the conclusions about the “enemy” presented in the military memorandum of 21 September 1992 by * LLD (Stockholm University-Sweden); LLM (Stockholm University-Sweden); LLB (Hons) (Makerere University – Uganda) Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.
    [Show full text]
  • “Fully Aware of the Power of Words”: Morality, Politics
    “FULLY AWARE OF THE POWER OF WORDS”: MORALITY, POLITICS, AND LAW IN THE RWANDAN “MEDIA TRIAL" A Thesis by BRADLEY SERBER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2012 Major Subject: Communication Studies “Fully Aware of the Power of Words”: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Rwandan “Media Trial” Copyright 2012 Bradley Serber “FULLY AWARE OF THE POWER OF WORDS”: MORALITY, POLITICS, AND LAW IN THE RWANDAN “MEDIA TRIAL” A Thesis by BRADLEY SERBER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, James Arnt Aune Committee Members, Jennifer Mercieca Larry Yarak Head of Department, James Arnt Aune August 2012 Major Subject: Communication Studies iii ABSTRACT “Fully Aware of the Power of Words”: Morality, Politics, and Law in the Rwandan “Media Trial”. (August 2012) Bradley Serber, B.A., University of Minnesota Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. James Arnt Aune Incitement to genocide is a fairly recent and elusive concept in international law. First used at Nuremberg, the concept did not reappear for more than fifty years, when the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) used it to convict and sentence three media executives: Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza, and Hassan Ngeze. Using their trial as a case study, I use rhetorical analysis to help clarify both the concept of “incitement” and the role that morality, politics, and law play in genocide and its aftermath.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Great Friends, They Stand by You In
    April 2016 ‘GREAT FRIENDS, THEY STAND BY YOU IN DIFFICULT TIMES’: A study of Opération Turquoise in light of divisions within the François Mitterrand and Edouard Balladur cohabitation government during the Rwandan Genocide, April – August 1994 Candidate Number: W23342 Word Count: 10,196 words King’s College London History Department W23342 ‘Great friends, they stand by you in difficult times’1: a study of Opération Turquoise in light of the divisions within François Mitterrand and Edouard Balladur’s cohabitation government during the Rwandan genocide, April – August 1994 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2 WHAT WAS OPÉRATION TURQUOISE? 5 HISTORY OF FRANCE IN RWANDA 7 WAS OPÉRATION TURQUOISE AN EXCLUSIVELY HUMANITARIAN FORCE? 9 TREATMENT OF SOURCES 11 COHABITATION AND AFRICA 14 UNREST AT BOTH ENDS OF THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM 18 PRIMARY ANALYSIS 21 FIGHTING FOR THE MORAL HIGH GROUND 26 CONCLUSION 28 BIBLIOGRAPHY 32 APPENDICES 35 In 1994, the French government was at a political impasse. Its Conseil des ministres had been upended and reconstituted after the 1993 legislative elections. Under the François Mitterrand- Edouard Balladur cohabitation, the left and the right had been forced to work together, and the Rassemblement pour la république (RPR) and Union pour la Démocratie française (UDF) centre-right coalition, that had been so successful in winning seats in 1993, began to unravel. It was a crucial time; presidential elections were looming and the Parti 1 Taken from an issue of Kangura newspaper, with a full page photo of François Mitterrand, Article no.6, December 1990. See Linda Melvern, A People Betrayed: The role of the West in the Rwandan Genocide (London, revised 2009), p30 2 W23342 Socaliste had to find a replacement for François Mitterrand, who was ending a relatively successful two-term presidency and had been diagnosed with testicular cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Friends of Evil: When Ngos Support Genocidaires
    The Friends Of Evil: When NGOs support genocidaires Tom Ndahiro 2013 2 Contents 1 Refugees’ Camps under the Military 7 1.1 Road map . 8 1.2 Taking the lead . 9 1.3 Strategic decisions . 10 2 The FAR’s Vision for the Future 17 2.1 Scenarios for the return of refugees . 18 3 Refugees in captivity 27 4 The RDR or disguised genocidaires 33 5 How to wage continued genocide and terrorism 55 6 When racial hatred is fashionable 63 7 Complicity between the NGOs and the genocidaires 75 8 Rwandan civil society in exile–villains posturing as victims 89 9 Other initiatives of Rwandans living in Exile 101 10 Fast moves from European NGOs to rehabilitate felons 127 11 A Club of Lovers of Hatred 139 12 Carrero, a Mockery to the Nobel Peace Prize 147 13 Indifference to the demons of race 159 14 Final Appeal and Conclusion 167 3 4 CONTENTS Foreword “Friends of Evil” will be a troubling surprise for anyone who believes — as most probably do in North America and Europe -– that the 1994 Rwanda genocide is a thing of the past and a lesson learned for the international community. The book is based on extensive new research and documentation which will be a revelation even to Rwanda experts. The first part shows how in 1994-95 the “Hutu Power” perpetrators of the genocide, allowed by the international community to regroup in eastern Congo, reorganized themselves behind a new organization called the RDR, and developed their military and political strategy to return to power in Rwanda.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tutsi Colonisation Plan, Conspiracy, and Genocide in Rwanda
    False, historical, ‘accusations in a mirror’? The Tutsi Colonisation Plan, conspiracy, and genocide in Rwanda 1. Introduction The historical memory of conflict is an important factor in genocide and ethnic violence. Even if we discard accounts of genocides as inspired by unchanging 'ancient hatreds', real or imagined grievances and prior conflicts provide a rich reservoir of symbols and narratives. These could be instrumentally or sincerely deployed to divide populations, warn of prior atrocities that might be repeated, identify scores to settle, and recast the current conflict as an existential struggle (Kaufman, 2006). Often, these memories might be deliberately distorted or reinterpreted. Historical memory may correspond to the past, but it is shaped, rearticulated, and consumed in the present. In Rwanda, news sources like Kangura and RTLM repeatedly (and deeply anachronistically) spread the idea that Tutsis represented 'Negro-Nazi movements thirsty for blood and power' (Kangura, 1990a), or 'proudly marched under the swastika of their criminal ancestor Hitler' (Kangura International Version, 1992, p10). Such Tutsi-Nazi equivalencies were a key theme throughout Hutu power discourse of the time (RTLM, 1994a, p7; 1994b, p5; 1994c, p22). In other cases, elites might overstate the equivalency between the past and present. In Serbia, a key theme of the rhetoric used to justify ethnic cleansing, and in some cases, genocidal violence was the idea that its neighbours were on the verge of 'physical, political, legal, and cultural … genocide' (SANU, 1986) against the nation. Slobodan Milosevic warned that his citizens might be 'subject to genocide for the second time in this century' (Belgrade TV, 1992), and the idea of imminent threat was a particular spur to violence by Republika Srpska.
    [Show full text]