Sam Berman A.P. European Richard Arkwright
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Jedediah and His Family
AMBER VALLEY JEDEDIAH STRUTT Jedediah and his family Jedediah Strutt is the man who connected all the sites in the Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site. His Matlock Bath hosiery business and early silk mill were in Derby, and Cromford Jedediah was the leading partner in the development of Cromford Mill. The Belper and Milford Mills were built by Jedediah and his eldest son and his eldest Cromford Canal daughter married into the Evans family at Darley DERWENT VALLEY Whatstandwell Abbey. VISITOR CENTRE Jedediah remained a plain-living man despite his accumulated wealth, adhering to his Unitarian beliefs. He had three sons and two daughters by his wife, Ambergate Jedediah Strutt Elizabeth who died in 1774. Jedediah took a great A6 interest in his children’s education and development. He married Anne Daniels in 1781 and built a plain mansion as their home, Milford House. “Here rest in peace J. S. who without fortune, family or Belper friends raised to himself a fortune, family and name in the world; without having wit, had a good share of plain Milford common sense; without much genius, employed the more substantial blessing of a sound understanding; with but little personal pride, despised a mean or base action; Duffield with no ostentation for religious tenets and ceremonies, A6 he led a life of honesty and virtue, not knowing what Little would befall him after death, he died in full confidence Eaton that if there be a future state of retribution it would be to River reward the virtuous and the good. For more information visit A6 Derwent Strutt’s North Mill Darley This I think my true character.” The Derwent Valley Visitor Centre Abbey This was the obituary he had written for himself and Bridgefoot, Belper, Derbyshire DE56 1YD Little was found some time after his death - Jedediah Strutt Chester Tel: 01773 880474 / 0845 5214347 died 7th May 1797. -
Framework Knitting and the Hosiery Trade
BELPER TOWN CENTRE FRAMEWORK KNITTING AND THE HOSIERY TRADE DERWENT VALLEY VISITOR CENTRE The partnership between Brettle and Ward was dissolved and George Brettles built his own factory Framework Knitting in 1834. These two firms were of considerable size. They made silk stockings for George III, George IV and Queen Victoria. and the Ward’s ceased trading in the 1930’s and Brettles in 1987. Many smaller hosiery firms provided work for local people and these were scattered around the Hosiery trade town. All these factories have closed except for Aristoc which now operates across the road in the West Mill. Circular knitting slowly superseded flatbed knitting, as it was more efficient. Today all hosiery is made this way. For more information visit Strutt’s North Mill, The Derwent Valley Visitor Centre Bridgefoot, Belper, Derbyshire, DE56 1YD Tel: 01773 880474 / 0845 5214347 BELPER NORTH MILL Email: [email protected] www.belpernorthmill.org.uk Local Interest Leaflet The existing part of Brettles factory, now De Bradelei Stores Leaflet design by Mayers Design Ltd · www.mayers-design.co.uk Number 3 Framework knitters earned a poor living, usually their on by hand. After a brief partnership with two Derby frames were hired from the hosier who was supplying hosiers, Jedediah formed a successful partnership with the yarn and selling the stockings. The framework Samuel Need, an older, experienced hosier from knitter would have to pay the rent for the frame Nottingham who was able to finance the venture. This even when there was no work. The machines were made Jedediah Strutt’s first fortune. -
The Industrial Revolution and British Economic Expansion in Relation to Energy Prices and Labour Costs
The Industrial Revolution and British Economic Expansion in Relation to Energy Prices and Labour Costs by Sasan Fouladirad Essay submitted to the Department of Economics As a requirement of the M.A. Economics program Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada June 2017 Copyright © Sasan Fouladirad, 2017 Acknowledgments I feel extremely grateful to have Professor Taylor Jaworski as my supervisor. Having taken a course with Taylor Jaworski also allowed me to learn more about economic history, which I have integrated in my paper as well. Therefore, I would like to thank Taylor Jaworski for all his help, advice and feedbacks this year and hope to work with him again in the future. I would like to thank Professor Sumon Majumdar and Dr. Antoine Djogbenou as well for all their support throughout the year and also, I would like to thank the Queen’s Economics Department itself for giving me a wonderful experience throughout this program. All errors are my own. II Dedication To my wonderful parents, for everything that I am is because of them. To my brother for his kindness and belief in me. III Table of Contents Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Section 1 - Comparison and Analysis of Britain and its Economic Structure 1.0 - Wage Levels and Energy Costs ------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1.1 - Major Inventions of Britain ----------------------------------------------------------------- 4 1.2 - Age of Enlightenment and Human Capital ---------------------------------------------- -
Download Download
International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No. 7, (2020), pp. 8795-8803 Influence of Changes in the Mechanical-Physical Properties of Fibers on Yarn Quality Nuriddinova Rohila Pazlitdin qizi Department of “Technology of textile industry product”, Namangan Institute of Engineering and Technology, Namangan Uzbekistan Abstract This article investigated and examined the change in the basic physical and mechanical properties of fibers and their degree of purification in the technological process of spinning. The laws of the influence of the degree of purification on the basic physic mechanical properties of fibrous materials in the process of opening, cleaning and carding were also studied. The basic purpose of this study determine the to optimizing the technological parameters of spinning process for normal yarns by using fiber which is estimated as the average quality by the Uster®. Short fiber cotton was used to produce normal counts, i.e. Ne 30 normal yarns, spun on Zinser 72 Ring frame. Yarn produced by spinning processes from semi-finished products collected at different type technological parameters of spinning process shows variable yarn properties. The study of all these parameters plays important role to achieve better quality output of the spinning processes. Keywords: Quality, Neps, Think, Thick, Uniformity, Single yarn strength (RKM), Hairiness, Elongation. 1 Introduction: Well carded is half spun” is a famous adage widely used among the spinning technologist around the world. Spinning is an important foundation of the entire textile industry. Carding is considered as the heart of the spinning process. The carding process has a major impact on the final product, that is, yarn, in terms of uniformity, imperfection, and cleanliness. -
Belper Mills Site
Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site February 2017 Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site Contents Page numbers 1 Introduction 1 2 Heritage significance 1 - 4 3 End uses 4 - 5 4 Development strategy 5 - 9 4.1 Phase 1 6 - 7 4.2 Phase 2 7 4.3 Phase 3 8 4.4 The end result 9 5 Costs of realisation 10 - 11 6 Potential financing – capital and revenue 11 - 15 6.1 Capital/realisation 11 - 12 6.2 Revenue sustainability 12 - 15 7 Delivery 15 - 16 Appendices 1 Purcell's Statement of Significance 2 Purcell's Feasibility Study Belper North Mill Trust Outline masterplan for the renewal of the Belper Mills site 1 Introduction As part of this phase of work for the Belper North Mill Trust we have, with Purcell Architects, carried out an outline masterplanning exercise for the whole Belper Mills site. At the outset, it is important to say that at the moment the site is privately owned and that while Amber Valley Borough Council initiated a Compulsory Purchase Order process in 2015, that process is still at a preliminary stage. This is a preliminary overview, based on the best available, but limited, information. In particular, access to the buildings on site has been limited; while a considerable amount of the North Mill is accessible because it is occupied, access to the East Mill, now empty, was not made available to us. Also, while we have undertaken some stakeholder consultation, we have not at this stage carried out wider consultation or public engagement, nor have we undertaken detailed market research, all of which would be essential to any next stage planning for the future of the site. -
The Strutt Industrial Settlement in Belper
The Strutt industrial settlement in Belper Modern Belper represents at least four phases of development: the original medieval rural settlement of Beaurepaire that centres on the chapel of St John; the later growth lower down the hill which, by the middle years of the 18th century included a market place on a lower level than the present one; the industrial community established by Jedediah Strutt in the late 18th century on the northern edge of the existing settlement and around Belper Bridge Foot and up Belper Lane; and the 19th century expansion of the commercial centre along King Street and Bridge Street. The most prominent of the Strutt industrial housing stands on land to the south of the mill complex and to the east of the Derby-Matlock road. The land was acquired largely through numerous individual purchases, with its end use for workers’ housing clearly in mind. The houses were all of a high standard with gardens and, in certain areas, allotments for the residents. The housing, constructed from Derbyshire gritstone or locally made brick, and roofed with Staffordshire blue clay tiles or Welsh slate, was largely placed in an east-west alignment connected by narrow passages giving an almost grid-iron character to the layout. Construction of housing by the Strutt estate continued into the 20th century. The houses vary in form from row to row as the Strutts experimented with different designs. The result is a visually cohesive, attractive and unique mix of workers’ housing. As well as the land on the slopes to the east of the mills, the Strutts had also by the 1790s acquired land and property and started to build housing on the south facing slope to the north-west, adjoining their Bridge Hill estate. -
Prices and Profits in Cotton Textiles During the Industrial Revolution C
PRICES AND PROFITS IN COTTON TEXTILES DURING THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION C. Knick Harley PRICES AND PROFITS IN COTTON TEXTILES DURING THE 1 INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION C. Knick Harley Department of Economics and St. Antony’s College University of Oxford Oxford OX2 6JF UK <[email protected]> Abstract Cotton textile firms led the development of machinery-based industrialization in the Industrial Revolution. This paper presents price and profits data extracted from the accounting records of three cotton firms between the 1770s and the 1820s. The course of prices and profits in cotton textiles illumine the nature of the economic processes at work. Some historians have seen the Industrial Revolution as a Schumpeterian process in which discontinuous technological change created large profits for innovators and succeeding decades were characterized by slow diffusion. Technological secrecy and imperfect capital markets limited expansion of use of the new technology and output expanded as profits were reinvested until eventually the new technology dominated. The evidence here supports a more equilibrium view which the industry expanded rapidly and prices fell in response to technological change. Price and profit evidence indicates that expansion of the industry had led to dramatic price declines by the 1780s and there is no evidence of super profits thereafter. Keywords: Industrial Revolution, cotton textiles, prices, profits. JEL Classification Codes: N63, N83 1 I would like to thank Christine Bies provided able research assistance, participants in the session on cotton textiles for the XII Congress of the International Economic Conference in Madrid, seminars at Cambridge and Oxford and Dr Tim Leung for useful comments. -
Inventions in the Cotton Industry
Inventions in the Cotton Industry Paisley Thread Mill Museum A Family of Threads John Kay: The Flying Shuttle 1733 • For centuries handloom weaving had been carried out by the shuttle with the yarn on being passed slowly and awkwardly from one hand to the other. • In 1733 John Kay patented his flying shuttle which dramatically increased the speed of this process. • Kay placed shuttle boxes at each side of the loom connected by a long board, known as a shuttle race. • With cords, a single weaver, using one hand, could knock the shuttle back and forth across the loom from one shuttle box to the other. • A weaver using Kay's flying shuttle could produce much wider cloth at much faster speeds than before. James Hargreaves: The Spinning Jenny 1764 • In 1764 Hargreaves built what became known as the Spinning- Jenny. • The machine used eight spindles onto which the thread was spun. • By turning a single wheel, the operator could now spin eight threads at once. • Later, improvements were made that enabled the number to be increased to eighty. • However, the thread that the machine produced was coarse and lacked strength. Richard Arkwright: The Water Frame 1771 • Richard Arkwright: The Water Frame 1771 • In 1762 Richard Arkwright met John Kay and Thomas Highs, who were trying to produce a new spinning- machine, to improve on the Spinning-Jenny. • Kay and Highs had run out of money and Arkwright offered to employ John Kay to make the new machine, with other, local craftsman to help. • It was not long before the team produced the Spinning-Frame. -
Please Click Here to Download a PDF of the Detailed Listing to Part 3
Portfolio Approx. Earliest No: of Type Cylinder Horse RPM Owner of Other Details Number No: of Date on Engines of Diameter x Power Engine Drawings Drawings Engine Stroke REEL TWENTYNINE Scotland: Ayr 208 12 Sep 1800 1 28” 1/8 x 6’0 30 38 David Dale Cotton Mill. Later acquired by James Finlay & Co. Engine erected at Catrine. Lanark 13 1790 1 S 26” x 6’0 10 John & William Purchased from Folliot Scott & Wilson Co. Forge Mill Engine at Wilson Town, Lanark. 193 14 Sep 1799 1 D 29” x 6’0 32 John Pattison Parchment dated October 1, 1799. John Pattison of Glasgow. Cotton Mill, Glasgow. Payment £797. 106,000lbs. 10 feet high. Purchased by Mr Dunn. 199 7 April 1800 1 D 17” 2/3 x 4’0 10 John Cotton Mill. Brigtown near Bartholomew Glasgow. 202 8 April 1800 1 19” 1/4 x 4’0 12 James Cook & Flax Mill, Glasgow. Co 204 8 May 1800 1 16” x 4’0 8 Robert Brewery, Glasgow. Struthers & Co 209 8 Aug 1800 1 D 28” 1/8 x 6’0 30 Corporation of Flour Mill. Patrick Mills, Bakers Glasgow. 216 3 Feb 1801 1 16” x 4’0 8 50 James Monach Cotton Mill, Glasgow. Originally Matthew Boulton’s Mint Engine. Belonged to Indoe and Galbraith by 1813. 228 9 Aug 1801 1 19” 1/4 x 4’0 12 Tennant Knox Chemical Manufactory, & Co Glasgow. Portfolio Approx. Earliest No: of Type Cylinder Horse RPM Owner of Other Details Number No: of Date on Engines of Diameter x Power Engine Drawings Drawings Engine Stroke Renfrewshire 177 14 Dec 1798 1 D 21” 1/4 x 5’0 16 Underwood Parchment dated January 1, Spinning Co 1799. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for Council, 11/09/2019 18:00
Oldham Borough Council Council Meeting Wednesday 11 September 2019 OLDHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL To: ALL MEMBERS OF OLDHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL, CIVIC CENTRE, OLDHAM Tuesday, 3 September 2019 You are hereby summoned to attend a meeting of the Council which will be held on Wednesday 11 September 2019 at 6.00 pm in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, for the following purposes: 1 To receive apologies for absence 2 To order that the Minutes of the meeting of the Council held on 10th July 2019 be signed as a correct record (Pages 1 - 32) 3 To receive declarations of interest in any matter to be determined at the meeting 4 To deal with matters which the Mayor considers to be urgent business 5 To receive communications relating to the business of the Council 6 To receive and note petitions received relating to the business of the Council (time limit 20 minutes) There are no petitions to note. 7 Youth Council (time limit 20 minutes) There is no Youth Council business to consider. 8 Questio n Time a Public Questions (time limit 15 minutes) b Questions to Leader and Cabinet (time limit 30 minutes) c Questions on Cabinet Minutes (Pages 33 - 50) (time limit 15 minutes) 24th June 2019 22nd July 2019 d Questions on Joint Arrangements/Partnerships (Pages 51 - 130) (time limit 15 minutes) Greater Manchester Health and Care Board 31st May 2019 Greater Manchester Transport Committee 12th July 2019 Greater Manchester Waste and Recycling Committee 14th March 2019 National Park Authority 5th July 2019 (AGM) 19th July 2019 Mio Care Board 11th March 2019 Greater Manchester Combined Authority 28th June 2019 9 Notice of Administration Business (time limit 30 minutes) Motion 1 Councillor Shah to MOVE and Councillor Chauhan to SECOND: Kashmir This Council notes with concern (i) the Indian Government’s decision to remove Article 370 and 35A from the Indian Constitution, which grants special status to Indian-controlled Kashmir, the recent movement of troops into Kashmir and the imposition of travel restrictions and a communications blackout affecting landlines, mobile phones and the internet. -
189 Derby Tall Buildings Study Final Report
DERBY TALL BUILDINGS STUDY FINAL REPORT APPENDICES 189 APPENDIX 1 HERITAGE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY DESIGNATED HERITAGE ASSETS IMPORTANT VIEWS Mel Morris Conservation was appointed in July Assessment of the setting of designated heritage The Views Analysis undertaken by Mel Morris 2019 as part of the Urban Initiatives Ltd team assets is one of professional judgement, Conservation in 2018 as part of the Skyline Study undertaking the Derby Tall Buildings Strategy, to which starts from the point of understanding focused on strategic views into and around the city address the setting of heritage assets and identify significance. This assessment follows the Historic centre. In addition to these views, conservation different levels of sensitivity to tall buildings. England guidance on setting – “The Setting of area character appraisals for the conservation Heritage Assets - Historic Environment Good areas within the city identify additional important The definition of tall buildings is derived from Practice Advice in Planning: 3” (Second Edition, views. The city has five published conservation Historic England’s 2015 document “Tall Buildings: December 2017). This sets out a checklist, in area appraisals and these identify significant Historic England Advice Note 4” (December 2015), bullet-point form, of potential attributes (step views. There are eleven other conservation area which recognises tall buildings as being ‘tall’ 2 checklist). We have considered this list and appraisals of which Strutts Park Conservation Area, relative to their context. have asked further key searching questions with Little Chester Conservation Area and Nottingham The definition of setting is set out in the Glossary specific relevance to tall buildings (see Measuring Road Conservation Area are the closest to the area of the National Planning Policy Framework (Feb Sensitivity). -
Understanding the UK's Productivity Problems: New Technological Solutions Or a Case for the Renewal of Old Institutions?
University of Birmingham Understanding the UK’s productivity problems Lewis, Paul; Bell, Kate DOI: 10.1108/ER-10-2018-0273 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Lewis, P & Bell, K 2019, 'Understanding the UK’s productivity problems: new technological solutions or a case for the renewal of old institutions?', Employee Relations, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 296-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER- 10-2018-0273 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 20/03/2019 Paul Lewis, Kate Bell, (2019) "Understanding the UK’s productivity problems: New technological solutions or a case for the renewal of old institutions?", Employee Relations: The International Journal, Vol. 41 Issue: 2, pp.296-312, https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2018-0273 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.