DOCSLIB.ORG

Revolutionary Government 99

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revolutionary Government 99 ON THE PRINCIPTES OF REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNMENT 99 t3 which brought it into being. It should not be sought in the books of political writers, who did not foresee that revolution, nor in the laws of tyrants who, satisfied with abusing their power, are not much concented ON TH E PRINCIPLES OF with its legitimacy; and to the aristocracy that word is only a subject of ten-or or slanderous text; to tyrants, a mere scandal; to many other REVOLUTIONARY people, just an enigma; it needs to be explained to all, so that good citizens at least will rally to the principles of the public interest. GOVE RN M ENT The function of government is to direct the moral and physical forces of the nation towards the goal of its appointing. The goal of constitutional govemnent is ro preserve the Republic; 25 December 179315 Nrvdse yeor ll1 that of revolutionary govemment is to found it. Revolution is the war of liberty against its enemies: the constitution is the system of liberry victorious and at peace. (Maximilien Robespierre) Revolutionary government needs extraordinary activiry, precisely because it is at war. It is subject to less uniform and less rigorous rules, because the circumstances in which it exists are stonny and shifting, and A month after the passage of Biilaud-varenne's deoee,z Robespierre defended above all because it is continually forced to deploy new resources rapidly, the necessity ,Indurgents, of tlrc Terror. It was a response to the and to camilre to confront new and pressing dangers. Desmoulins and his fiewspaper Le Vieux cordelier in partiu,lar, who rmd Constitutional govemment is concerned principally with civil liber-ty, uoiced citicisrn of the Terror. and revolutionary goverrrment, with public liberry. lJnder the constitu- tional system, it almost suffices to protect individuals against abuse of Citizen people's representarives, public power; under the revolutionary system, public power itself is Successes send weak souls to sreep; they spur strong souls on. Let us obliged to defend itself against all the factions attacking it. leave it to Europe and history to praise the rniracles of foulon,3 while we Revolutionary govemment owes good citizens full national protec- prepare new triumphs for liberry. tion; to enemies of the people it owes nothing but death. The Republic's defenders adopt caesar's maxim: they believe nothing These notions suffice to explain the ongin and nature of the laws we has been done so long as something remains to be done. we still face call revolutionary. Those who call them arbitrary or tyrannical are stupid enough dangers to occupy all our zeal. or pelverse sophists seeking to confuse opposites: they wanr to apply the vanquishing Englishmen and traitors is something easy enough for the same system to peace and war, health and sickness; or rather they only valour of our republican soldiers; there is an enterprise that is no ress want the resurrection of ryranny and the death of the homeland. If they important and more difficult: to confound through unwavering energy invoke the literal execution of constitutional adages, it is just to violate the eternal intrigues of all the enernies of our liberry, .rrrrr.""triumph them with impuniry. They are cowardly assassins who, to cut the for the principles ".rd on which public prosperity should be based. Republic's throat in its cradle without risk, try hard to muzzle it with Such are the fint duties you have imposed on your cornmittee of vague rnaxims from which they are practised at extricating themselves. Public SaGry. The constitutional vessel was not built to stay in dry dock for ever; but we are going to start by developing the principles and the necessity of should it have been launched in mid*tempest, into unfavourable winds? revolutionary government; then we will show the cause that tends to That was wanted by the fyrants and slaves who had opposed its paralyse it at birth. construction; but the French people has ordered you to wait for calmer The theory of revolutionary goverruxent ls as new as the revolution conditions. Its unanimous wishes, instantlv drownins the clamour from IOO VIRTUE AND TERROR ON THE PRINCIPLES OF REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNIYENT IOI the aristocracy and federalism, comrnanded you to deliver it first frorn all ener-rries ofliberry are looking to tum against it not only its faults, but also its enemies" its wisest neasures. Is the govemment coming down on rvhat is caiied Temples to the gods are not meant to provide sanctuary for the exaggeration? They seek to revive moderantism and adstocracy. If it sacrilegious who come to profane them; nor is the constitution supposed tums its attention to those two tlonsters, tirey prolllote exaggeratlon protect to the plots of tyrants who seek to destroy it. with all their might. It is dangerous to ieave them the rleans to mjslead If revolutionary govemment should be more active in its working and the zeal of good citizens; it is more dangerous still to discourage and fieer in its movements than ordinary government, does that ,,.^ ake it less persecute the good citizens they have deceived. Through one of these just and less legitimate? No. It is supported by the holiest of all laws: the abuses, the republic would be in danger of expiring in a convulsive salvation of the people; by the rnost indisputable of all endtiements: movement; through the other, it would infallibly pine away. necessity. So what should be done? Hunt down the culpable inventors of has It its rules too, all drawn from justice and public order. It has perfidious schemes, protecr patriotism, even in its errors; enhghten nothing in common with anarchy or disorder; its pu{pose on the patriots; and constantly raise the people to the level of its rights and contrary is to suppress then, to introduce and consolidate the rule of destiny. law- has It nothing in common with arbitrary rule; it should not be If you do not adopt this rule, you iose everything. guided by individual passions, but by the public interest. If we had to choose between an excess of patriotic fervour and the It should come close to ordinary and general principles in ali cases total absence of civic spirit, or the stagnation of moderantislr, there where they can be applied rigorously without cornprornising pubric would be no hesitation. A vigorous body, tonlented by an excess of sap, liberry. The measure of its strength should be the boldness o. p.rfidy of leaves more resources than a co{pse. the conspiraton. The more terrible it is towards the wicked, th. Above all we n.rust be careful not to kill patriotism by trying to cure it. favourably -or" it should treat the good. The more circumstances impose Patriotism is ardent by its nature. Who can love the homeland coldly? necessary rigour on it, the more it should abstain from measures that It is the gift particularly of simple men, not much given to calculating the pointlessly 'Where interGre with liberry, and that jostle private interests without political consequences of a civic step from its motive. is the any public advantage. patriot, even enlightened, who has never been deceived? Yes! If it is has sail It to befween r'uvo dangerous rocks, weakness and temeriry, accepted that there are moderates and cowards of good faith, why should moderantism and excess;4 moderantism, which is to moderation as there not be patriots of good faith, who are sorletines carried away by a irnpotence is to chastiry, and excess, which resembles energy as dropsy praiseworthy sentiment to €io too far? So ifwe were to regard as criminals resembles health. those in the revolutionaly movement rvho nright have strayed beyond The ryrants have sought constantly to make us retreat into servitude by the exact line drawn by prudence, we would be including in a common the paths of moderantism; and sometimes they have also tried to drive us proscription, along with the bad citizens, all the natural friends of liberty, to the opposite extreme. Both extremes end at the same point.'whether your own friends and the best supporters of the Republic. The adroit ovenhot or undershot, the target is missed in both cases. Nothing ernissaries of fyranny, after having deceived them, would themselves resembles the apostle of federalism more closely than the untimely then become their accusers and perhaps their judges too. preacher of the single universal Republic. The friend of kinss and What then will disentangle all these uuances?'What wil1 trace the line the p.ublic prosecutor of the human race undentand one anothel qurte of demarcation between all the contradictory excesses? Love of the well.' The scapular-wearing fanatic and the fanatic preaching atheism homeland and tmth. Kings and knaves wili sti1l be seeking to erase it; have marry similarities. Democratic barons are the brothers of the they want nothing to do with reason or with truth. Koblenz" marquises; and sometimes red bonnets are closer to red hieh By sketching the duties of revolutionary govemment, we have heels than one might think. marked the pitfalls that threaten it. The greater its power, the more But here government needs to be extrenely circumspect, for the free and rapid its action, tire more it should be directed by good faith. On IO2 VIRTUE AND TERROR ON THE PRINCIPLES OF REVOLUTIONARY GOVERNMENT I03 the day it falls into impure or per{idious hands, liberry wi'be rost; rts very the functions of revolutionary administration are no longer laborious name will becorne a pretext and excuse for counter-revolutro'; its duties but objects of ambition, then the Republic is a.lready lost.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fair Shares for All
    FAIR SHARES FOR ALL JACOBIN EGALITARIANISM IN PRACT ICE JEAN-PIERRE GROSS This study explores the egalitarian policies pursued in the provinces during the radical phase of the French Revolution, but moves away from the habit of looking at such issues in terms of the Terror alone. It challenges revisionist readings of Jacobinism that dwell on its totalitarian potential or portray it as dangerously Utopian. The mainstream Jacobin agenda held out the promise of 'fair shares' and equal opportunities for all in a private-ownership market economy. It sought to achieve social justice without jeopardising human rights and tended thus to complement, rather than undermine, the liberal, individualist programme of the Revolution. The book stresses the relevance of the 'Enlightenment legacy', the close affinities between Girondins and Montagnards, the key role played by many lesser-known figures and the moral ascendancy of Robespierre. It reassesses the basic social and economic issues at stake in the Revolution, which cannot be adequately understood solely in terms of political discourse. Past and Present Publications Fair shares for all Past and Present Publications General Editor: JOANNA INNES, Somerville College, Oxford Past and Present Publications comprise books similar in character to the articles in the journal Past and Present. Whether the volumes in the series are collections of essays - some previously published, others new studies - or mono- graphs, they encompass a wide variety of scholarly and original works primarily concerned with social, economic and cultural changes, and their causes and consequences. They will appeal to both specialists and non-specialists and will endeavour to communicate the results of historical and allied research in readable and lively form.
    [Show full text]
  • Actas Colóquio – Literatura E História
    João Medina Estética e Terror: o romance “Os deuses têm sede” de Anatole France “Que a guilhotina salve a pátria (...). Santa guilhotina, salva a pátria!” Fala de Gamelin em Os Deuses têm Sede, de Anatole France. “(...) quem se recusar a obedecer à vontade geral será obrigado a fazê-lo por todo o corpo; o que não significa outra cosia senão que será forçado a ser livre.” Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Do Contrato Social, livr. I. cap.VII. O romance histórico de Anatole France Os Deuses têm Sede, publicado em 1912, situado no período do Terror (1793 em diante, até aos começos do Directório), pertence ao período de desilusões do seu autor, já depois de o affaire Dreyfus ter tido o seu desfecho favorável ao capitão alsaciano, entretanto oficialmente reabilitado e reintegrado no exército. O seu autor tinha já 68 anos (nascera em 1844). Em 1908 publicara uma história paródica da França em tons ácidos e nada complacentes para com os seus compatriotas, sobretudo os contemporâneos, intitulada A Ilha dos Pinguins. Nesse mesmo ano saíra uma Joana de Arc escrita em veia semelhante de sarcasmo e desencanto. Com o romance histórico de 1912 adensava-se a sua visão pessimista e impiedosa, atendendo em especial aos seus pressupostos político-ideológicos de republicano socializante e dreyfusista empenhado no affaire, ao qual dedicara, aliás, alguns anos antes, uma tetralogia sob o título geral de História contemporânea: os romances O Olmo do Mail, O Manequim de Vime (1897), O Anel de Ametista (1898) e O Sr. Bergeret em Paris (1901), de que se fez na época tradução portuguesa111.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Mcphee, Maximilien Robespierre's False Friends
    34 French History and Civilization Maximilien Robespierre's False Friends Peter McPhee At the close of the sessions of the National Assembly in September 1791, Maximilien Robespierre was chaired from the chamber by a group of Parisians to shouts of “Vive l’Incorruptible!”, a reference to the nickname he had enjoyed for several months.1 He had also made some close political friends: in particular, Jérôme Pétion (who had been chaired from the session with him), Camille Desmoulins and Georges Danton. But across the next thirty months Robespierre agreed – however reluctantly – that all three should be tried for capital offences. How had friendships come to this? What was the relationship between friendship and politics? And what effects may the deaths of erstwhile friends have had on Robespierre’s health and his political judgment? After his return to Paris from a brief holiday in November 1791, Robespierre wrote glowingly to his best friend Antoine Buissart in Arras about the affection showered on him at the Jacobin Club and in public. On the day of his return, he had gone directly to the Club, where he was made its president on the spot. In particular, he had been delighted to see his friend Jérôme Pétion, victorious over Lafayette in elections as mayor of Paris: “I supped the same evening at Pétion’s. With what joy we saw each other again! With what delight we embraced! … The burden with which he is charged is enormous, but I have no doubt that the love of the people and his qualities will give him the means to bear it.
    [Show full text]
  • Masculinity in French Republican Socialist Rhetoric Randolph A
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations December 2018 A New Brand of Men: Masculinity in French Republican Socialist Rhetoric Randolph A. Miller University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Randolph A., "A New Brand of Men: Masculinity in French Republican Socialist Rhetoric" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2000. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/2000 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A NEW BRAND OF MEN: MASCULINITY IN FRENCH REPUBLICAN SOCIALIST RHETORIC by Randolph Miller A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee December 2018 ABSTRACT A NEW BRAND OF MEN: MASCULINITY IN FRENCH REPUBLICAN SOCIALIST RHETORIC by Randolph Miller The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2018 Under the Supervision of Professor Carolyn Eichner Social theorist and activist, August Blanqui, used his appearance before court in 1832 to lay out an argument that condemned the present political and economic system and demanded emancipation of the male worker. During his monologue, along with his devastating portrayal of worker misery and systemic corruption, Blanqui made comparisons between the male bourgeoisie and the male proletariat. Recounting the recent overthrow of Charles X for his audience, Blanqui described the “glorious workers” as six feet tall, towering over a groveling bourgeoisie who praised them for their “selflessness and courage.” According to Blanqui, the workers, unlike the aristocracy of wealth who oppressed them, were both physically dominant and selfless—two features that indicated a superior masculinity in the minds of radicals.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of French Literature
    A History of French Literature Edward Dowden A History of French Literature Table of Contents A History of French Literature.........................................................................................................................1 Edward Dowden.......................................................................................................................................2 PREFACE................................................................................................................................................4 BOOK THE FIRST. THE MIDDLE AGES.........................................................................................................5 CHAPTER I. NARRATIVE RELIGIOUS POETRY—THE NATIONAL EPIC—THE EPIC OF ANTIQUITY—ROMANCES OF LOVE AND COURTESY...............................................................6 CHAPTER II. LYRICAL POETRY—FABLES, AND RENARD THE FOX—FABLIAUX—THE ROMANCE OF THE ROSE...................................................................13 CHAPTER III. DIDACTIC LITERATURE—SERMONS—HISTORY.............................................18 CHAPTER IV. LATEST MEDIÆVAL POETS—THE DRAMA.......................................................24 BOOK THE SECOND. THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY...................................................................................30 CHAPTER I. RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION......................................................................31 CHAPTER II. FROM THE PLÉIADE TO MONTAIGNE..................................................................36 BOOK
    [Show full text]
  • Class Struggle in the First French Republic Bourgeois and Bras Nus 1793-1795
    Daniel Guerin Class Struggle in the First French Republic Bourgeois and Bras Nus 1793-1795 translated from the French by Ian Patterson First published in French in 1973 Copyright© Editions Gallimard 1973 This translation first published 1977 by Pluto Press Limited Unit 10 Spencer Court, 7 Chalcot Road, London NWl 8LH Copyright© Pluto Press 1977 ISBN 0 904383 44 X paperback 0 904383 30 X hardback Printed in England by Bristol Typesetting Company Limited Barton Manor, St Philips, Bristol Cover design by David King Contents Translator's Note/ vii Chronology / xi Preface to the English Language Edition / 1 Introduction/ 21 1. The Split to be A voided / 45 2. A Divorce in the Revolutionary Bourgeoisie / 73 3. Providing Support for the Poor I 94 4. Liquidation of the Enrages / 119 5. A Diversion Turns into an Upsurge/ 132 6. The Revolution Makes an About Turn/ 155 7. Strengthening the State/ 176 8. The Fall of the Hebertists / 195 9. Economic Retreat/ 218 10. The Fall of Danton, and its Reverberations / 234 11. Thennidor / 249 12. The Veil is Torn/ 268 Index/ 289 Translator's Note French terms have been translated wherever possible and explanatory phrases inserted where necessary. However, some aspects of revolutionary France demand fuller explanation. Revolutionary administration Under the law of 22 December 1789, which reorganised the electoral system, France was divided into 83 'departements', each of which was administered by an elected Council. Each Council appointed an Executive - or Directory - of eight mem­ bers, including a procureur-general-syndic who was responsible for the implementation and enforcement of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Insurgency and Revolutionary Republicanism
    REVOLUTIONARY INSURGENCY AND REVOLUTIONARY REPUBLICANISM: ASPECTS OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTIONARY TRADITION FROM THE ADVENT OF THE JULY MONARCHY THROUGH THE REPRESSION OF THE PARIS COMMUNE SUBMITTED BY: DAVID A. SHAFER DEGREE: PhD COLLEGE: UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON ProQuest Number: 10045641 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10045641 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT During the greater part of the nineteenth century the French political, social and cultural landscapes continued to reverberate from the echoes of the French Revolution. On one level, the Revolution framed the parameters of political debate. However, on another level the Revolution represented the first time in French history when political activism appeared to open up boundless opportunities for effecting change. In large measure, this was due to the prominence of popular protest in the Revolution and its transformation after 1789. Popular protest was nothing new to France. In fact, it was ingrained in the popular mentalité as a response to grievances. That said, the scope of popular protest during the ancien régime tended to be quite limited and rarely transcended the immediate source of the dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • Camille Desmoulins
    OEUVRES CAMILLE DESMOULINS IIECUEILLIES ET PUBLIEES D'APP,ÈS LES TEX'I S ORIGINAUX AUCJIENTÉES DE FRAGMENTS INÉDITS, DE NOTES ET DXN INOEX . í ET PKECEDEES D'UNE ETUOE BIOGRAPHIQUE ET LITTÉRAIRE M. JtJLE.S CLlKETie PARIS BIBLIOTHÈQUE-GHARPENTIER EUGÈNE FASQUELLE, ÉDÍTEUR 11, RUE DE GRENELLE, IJ ■V- ♦ ,N- 2 3 4 5 unesp' cm 5 unesp' 9 10 11 12 (EÜVRES DB CAMILLE DESMOÜLINS RECUEILLIES ET PUBLIÉES D'APRÈS LES TEXTES ORIGINÂUX AUGMENTÉES DE FBAGMENTS INÉDITS, DE NOTES ET D'UN INDEX ET PRKGÉDÉES D'UNE ÉTUDE BIOGRAPHIQUE ET LITTÉRAIRE M. JULES CLARETIE TOME PREMIER PARIS BIBLIOTHÈQUE-CHARPENTIEU EUeÈNE FASQUELLE, ÉDITEUR H, RUK DE GRENELLE, 11 1906 Tous droits reserves. cm 5 unesp' 10 11 12 AYERTISSEMENT DES ÉÜITEUBS Le lecteur trouvera, pour Ia première fois, réunis dans Ia presente édition des OEiivres c/e Camille Desmoulins, des travaux qui n'ont pas été réimpri- més depuis le tenips oíi leur auteur les publia. Les divers éditeurs de Desmoulins se sont bornésjusqu'ici à donner Ia France libre, le Discours de Ia Lan- ierne, le Vieux Cordelier et des morceaux choisis de Ia Correspondance de Camille. Nous avons voulu faire mieux, et Tédition que nous présentons au public contient, outre des documents nouveaux, des brochures et des écrits qui n'ont jamais été réunis. Cest ainsi qu'on rencontrera, dans les deux vo- lumes que Yoici, Ia fameuse Ode aux Etats Géné- raiix qui était déclarée rarissime par les chercheurs les plus habiles; des brochures de Camille demeu- récs quasi inédites, entre autres Ia curieuse Récla- niation en faveur du marquis de Saint-IIuruge; le prospectus de Ia Tribune des Patrioíes que Des- moulins rédigea avec Fréron, des fragments de ces Révoiiitions de France et de Brabant, qui sont pcut-être TcEUATe Ia plus étincelante de cet auteur.
    [Show full text]
  • Grace Phelan Final/Diss
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ ANTOINE FRANÇOIS MOMORO “First Printer of National Liberty” 1756-1794 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY by Grace M. Phelan September 2015 The Dissertation of Grace M. Phelan is approved: _______________________________ Professor Jonathan Beecher, Chair _______________________________ Professor Mark Traugott _______________________________ Professor Marilyn Westerkamp ___________________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Grace M. Phelan 2015 Table of Contents List of Illustrations iv Acknowledgments viii Introduction 1 1. From Besançon to Paris: Momoro's transition from Old Regime libraire to "First Printer of National Liberty" 14 2. Momoro's Political Ascendancy in Sectional Politics 84 3. Traité Elémentaire de l'Imprimerie: Conservative Instruction from the "First Printer of National Liberty" 177 4. Letters from the Vendée: Momoro's Narrative of Revolution and Counter- Revolution 252 Epilogue 321 Appendix A: Books Sold by Momoro, 1788-1790 325 Appendix B: Momoro's Publications, 1789-1793 338 Archival Sources 356 Works Cited 357 iii List of Illustrations 1. Premier Imprimeur de la Liberté Nationale 53 2. Second portrait of Momoro by Peronard 54 iv ABSTRACT Grace M. Phelan ANTOINE FRANCOIS MOMORO: "First Printer of National Liberty" 1756-1794 Antoine François Momoro (1756-1794) appears in historiographies of the French Revolution, in the history of printing and typography and in the history of work during the eighteenth century. Historians of the 1789 Revolution have often defined Momoro as either a sans-culottes or spokesman for the sans-culottes. Marxist historians and thinkers defined Momoro as an early socialist thinker for his controversial views on price fixing and private property.
    [Show full text]
  • English Republicanism in Revolutionary France: the Case of the Cordelier Club
    English Republicanism in Revolutionary France: The Case of the Cordelier Club Rachel Hammersley Le public Franc¸ais fut plus occupe´ qu’on ne pense de la re´volution anglaise. (Franc¸ois Guizot) The free thought of the French Revolution which makes [Guizot] shudder so convulsively, was imported into France from no other country than England. (Karl Marx) Introduction The last few decades of the twentieth century saw an explosion of interest in the notion of a republican tradition, and particularly in the in- tellectual legacy of the short-lived English Republic of the 1650s. Repub- lican works by John Milton, Marchamont Nedham, James Harrington, Edmund Ludlow, Algernon Sidney, and Henry Neville, as well as by their lesser-known contemporaries, have received a great deal of attention in recent years.1 Research has also focused on the republication of many Rachel Hammersley is lecturer in history at the University of Newcastle. She wrote this article while she was Leverhulme Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Sussex. Earlier versions of this article were presented at the North American Conference on British Studies in Baltimore; ‘La Re´publique et l’Ide´eRe´publicaine en Grande-Bretagne’ in Aix- en-Provence; and at the Literary and Intellectual History Seminar at the University of Sussex. I am grateful to the audiences on all three occasions for their questions and comments. Special thanks go to Colin Brooks, Ian Bullock, John Gurney, Martyn Hammersley, Maurice Hutt, Richard Whatmore, and Blair Worden, all of whom read and commented on drafts of this article. I would also like to thank the anonymous reader for some insightful and very helpful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Atheism, Religion, and Politics During the French Revolution Shane H
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2014 Les Hommes sans Dieu: Atheism, Religion, and Politics during the French Revolution Shane H. Hockin Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES LES HOMMES SANS DIEU: ATHEISM, RELIGION, AND POLITICS DURING THE FRENCH REVOLUTION By SHANE H. HOCKIN A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2014 \Shane H. Hockin defended this dissertation on March 31, 2014. The members of the supervisory committee were: Darrin McMahon Professor Directing Dissertation John Corrigan University Representative Rafe Blaufarb Committee Member Ed Gray Committee Member Charles Upchurch Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Writing a dissertation seems like a solo venture, but the truth is that the dissertation cannot come to fruition without the wisdom and aid of many people. These individuals cannot be appreciated enough. Some of them I do not even know their names. I am especially thankful for the assistance of the staff at the George A. Smathers Libraries, the Archives Nationales, the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the Newberry Library, and Strozier Library. They are the unsung heroes of my research and I could not have done this without them. Lucy Patrick and Sarah Buck-Kachaluba of Strozier Library deserve extra thanks for helping get me started.
    [Show full text]
  • Robespierre, the Duke of York, and Pisistratus During the French Revolutionary Terror*
    The Historical Journal, , (), pp. – © Cambridge University Press This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/./), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:./SX ROBESPIERRE, THE DUKE OF YORK, AND PISISTRATUS DURING THE FRENCH REVOLUTIONARY TERROR* COLIN JONES Queen Mary University of London AND SIMON MACDONALD Université Paris VIII ABSTRACT. Maximilien Robespierre was deposed on July / Thermidor Year II when the charge that he was a tyrant burst spectacularly into open political discussion in France. This article examines key aspects of how that charge had developed, and been discussed in veiled terms, over the preceding months. First, it analyses a war of words which unfolded between Robespierre and the duke of York, the commander of the British forces on the northern front. This involved allegations that Robespierre had used an assassination attempt against him in late May as a pretext for scapegoating the British – including the orchestration of a notorious government decree of Prairial/ May which banned the taking of British and Hanoverian prisoners of war. Second, the article explores how these developments fitted within a larger view of Robespierre as aiming for supreme power. In particular, they meshed closely with a reading of French politics which likened Robespierre to the ancient Athenian leader Pisistratus, a figure who had subverted the city’s consti- tution – including posing as a victim of violent attacks – in order to establish his tyranny. Pisistratus’s story, we argue, offered a powerful script for interpreting Robespierre’s actions, and a cue for resistance.
    [Show full text]