Laurier Avenue Segregated Bike Lane Monitoring Plan Final Report June 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laurier Avenue Segregated Bike Lane Monitoring Plan Final Report June 2013 Laurier Avenue Segregated Bike Lane Monitoring Plan FINAL REPORT June 2013 Laurier Avenue Segregated Bike Lane Monitoring Plan Final Report June 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Consultation ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) ............................................................................ 6 2.2 Public Advisory Committee (PAC) ................................................................................. 7 2.3 Project Website ................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Surveys ............................................................................................................................. 8 3.0 Study Design ........................................................................................................................ 8 4.0 Indicator 1: Effect on Meeting the City’s Cycling Modal Share Target............................. 9 4.1 Cycling Volumes on Laurier Avenue............................................................................... 9 4.2 Cycling Volumes to/from Downtown ............................................................................ 10 4.2.1 OD Survey .............................................................................................................. 10 4.2.2 Cycling Index .......................................................................................................... 11 4.3 Weather Influence on Cycling Volumes ........................................................................ 13 4.3.1 Season and Temperature ......................................................................................... 13 4.3.2 Precipitation ............................................................................................................ 14 4.4 Cyclist Trip Purpose ....................................................................................................... 14 4.5 Cyclist Profiles on Laurier Avenue ................................................................................ 15 4.6 Public Feedback Related to Meeting the City’s Cycling Modal Share Target .............. 17 5.0 Indicator 2: Motor Vehicle Operations ............................................................................. 17 5.1 Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................. 17 5.2 Travel Time .................................................................................................................... 19 5.3 Traffic Operations .......................................................................................................... 23 5.4 Public Feedback Related to Traffic Operations ............................................................. 24 6.0 Indicator 3: Road Safety Review ...................................................................................... 24 6.1 Collision Analysis .......................................................................................................... 24 6.1.1 Collision History & Frequency ............................................................................... 24 6.1.2 Location of Collisions (mid-block vs. intersections) .............................................. 26 6.2 Perceived Safety by Road Users .................................................................................... 27 6.3 Carleton University Safety Review ................................................................................ 27 6.4 Public Feedback Related to Roadway Safety ................................................................. 28 7.0 Indicator 4: Parking/Loading/Deliveries & Vehicle Access ............................................. 28 7.1 Parking Utilization ......................................................................................................... 29 McCormick Rankin | a Member of MMM Group 1 Laurier Avenue Segregated Bike Lane Monitoring Plan Final Report June 2013 7.2 Parking Revenue ............................................................................................................ 31 7.3 Parking and Stopping Infractions ................................................................................... 32 7.4 Vehicle Access and Sightline Concerns ......................................................................... 33 7.5 Public Feedback on Parking, Loading and Vehicle Access ........................................... 34 8.0 Indicator 5: Maintenance Operations ................................................................................. 34 8.1 Maintenance ................................................................................................................... 35 8.2 Public Feedback Related to Maintenance ...................................................................... 35 9.0 Indicator 6: Accessibility ................................................................................................... 35 9.1 Public Feedback Related to Accessibility ...................................................................... 36 10.0 Indicator 7: Emergency Services ....................................................................................... 36 10.1 Emergency Response Times ....................................................................................... 36 10.2 Anecdotal Review by Emergency Service Providers ................................................. 37 11.0 Indicator 8: Cycling Operations ........................................................................................ 37 11.1 Interference with the Segregated Bicycle Lane .......................................................... 37 11.2 Cyclist User Experience ............................................................................................. 39 11.3 Public Feedback Related to Cycling Operations ........................................................ 39 12.0 Indicator 9: Pedestrian Operations ..................................................................................... 40 12.1 Review of Mid-Block Pedestrian-Cyclist Conflicts ................................................... 40 12.2 Pedestrian User Experience ........................................................................................ 40 12.3 Public Feedback Related to Pedestrians ..................................................................... 41 13.0 Indicator 10: Business Located on Laurier Avenue ........................................................... 41 13.1 Business Survey .......................................................................................................... 41 13.1.1 Impact on Businesses .............................................................................................. 42 13.1.2 Person Trips to Downtown Businesses ................................................................... 42 13.1.3 Overall Impression .................................................................................................. 43 14.0 Indicator 11: Effect on Residents ....................................................................................... 43 14.1 Resident Survey .......................................................................................................... 43 14.1.1 Residents’ Mode of Travel...................................................................................... 44 14.2 Impact of the Segregated Bicycle Lanes on Residents and Quality of Life ............... 45 14.2.1 Driving on Laurier .................................................................................................. 45 14.2.2 Walking on Laurier ................................................................................................. 45 14.2.3 Deliveries and Service Workers .............................................................................. 45 14.2.4 Parking and Loading ............................................................................................... 45 14.2.5 Noise Due to Winter Maintenance .......................................................................... 46 14.2.6 Overall Impression .................................................................................................. 46 McCormick Rankin | a Member of MMM Group 2 Laurier Avenue Segregated Bike Lane Monitoring Plan Final Report June 2013 15.0 Indicator 12: User Clarity .................................................................................................. 46 15.1 Right Turning Vehicles Yield to Cyclists ................................................................... 47 15.2 Advanced Green Arrow at Traffic Signals ................................................................. 48 15.3 Left Turn Bike Box..................................................................................................... 48 15.4 Public Feedback Related to User Clarity .................................................................... 48 16.0 Summary of Monitoring Plan Findings ............................................................................. 49 16.1 Objective 1: Overall Performance of the Segregated Bike Lane Pilot Project ........... 49 16.2 Objectives 2 & 5: Design Considerations (Objectives 2 & 5) .................................... 52 16.3 Objective
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Assessment Act Section 7.1 Notice of Completion of Ministry Review
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT SECTION 7.1 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF MINISTRY REVIEW AN INVITATION TO COMMENT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CITY OF OTTAWA NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR LRT PROJECT An environmental assessment (EA) was submitted to the Ministry of the Environment by the City of Ottawa to construct and implement a 31 km twin-track, electrically powered Light Rail Transit (LRT) service between downtown Ottawa near the Rideau Centre to the southern terminus in the future Barrhaven Town Centre. The proposed undertaking also includes: - access to 34 stops/stations; - four new Park and Ride lots; - a rail yard for storage and maintenance; - seventeen electric substations to power the trains; and - provision for integration of bus transit services. The Ministry of the Environment has prepared a Review of the EA for review and comment by the public, agencies and aboriginal peoples. The Review does not determine whether the project should be approved. This decision is made by the Minister of the Environment following the five week comment period and the consideration of all submissions. You can now submit comments on the undertaking, the environmental assessment, and the ministry Review. You may also request that the Minister refer the application to the Environmental Review Tribunal for a hearing. If you request a hearing you must state in your submission whether you are requesting a hearing on the whole application or on only specified matters related to the proposed undertaking. HOW TO GET THE INFORMATION YOU NEED You can inspect the EA and the ministry Review during normal business hours at the following locations: - 2 - City of Ottawa Client Service Centres Kanata Client Service Centre 80 Terry Fox Drive, Ottawa ON K2L 4C2 Ben Franklin Place Client Service Centre 101 Centrepointe Drive, Nepean ON K2G 5K7 Orléans Client Service Centre 255 Centrum Blvd., Ste.
    [Show full text]
  • 68 Cooper Street
    68 Cooper Street PLANNING RATIONALE ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION December 2014 Revised January 2015 RICHCRAFT GROUP OF COMPANIES | 2280 ST. LAURENT BLVD., SUITE 201 OTTAWA, ONTARIO 68 COOPER STREET JANUARY 2015 CONTENTS 1 Application Submission ......................................................................................................................... 2 2 Contextual Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 2 3 The Proposal ......................................................................................................................................... 3 4 Policy Justification ................................................................................................................................. 5 5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 9 6 Appendix ............................................................................................................................................. 10 RICHCRAFT GROUP OF C OMPANIES 1 68 COOPER STREET JANUARY 2015 1 APPLICATION SUBMISSION Richcraft Homes Ltd. is seeking a Zoning By-law amendment with the purpose of introducing office use to its existing building located at 68 Cooper Street. The subject site is legally described as Lot 61 on Registered Plan 14350. It has a General Urban designation in the Official Plan, and is zoned Residential Fifth Density
    [Show full text]
  • International Year for Human Rights Conference
    t* Human Rights in Canada... The Years Ahead Conference to mark the 30th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Co-Chairpersons: Gordon Fairweather, Chief Commissioner, Canadian Human Rights Commission June Callwood, writer December 8-10, 1978 Ottawa Skyline Hotel Under the auspices of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, in collaboration with the Department of the Secretary of State and the Department of External Affairs The conference provides an opportunity for a number of organizations concerned about human rights: • to review the progress of human rights in Canada since the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, since the International Year for Human Rights of 1968, and midway through the Decade for Action to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination, 1973-83; • to exchange views and ideas on current problems and trends; • to consult on strategies and priorities for the future; • to define mutual objectives of non-governmental organizations and of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in the years to come. FRIDAY DECEMBER 8 SUNDAY DECEMBER 10 17:30-21:00 — Registration Convention Level Note: Delegates are reminded that the hotel Refreshments Carleton Room check-out time is 15:00 hours SATURDAY DECEMBER 9 8:45 — Refreshments 8:00 — Registration Opens 9:00 — Plenary Session Richelieu/Frontenac Rooms 9:00 Plenary Session: Richelieu/Frontenac Rooms Reports from Saturday Workshops Welcome and Focus, Gordon Fairweather Panel: "Recycling our resources to get results! Are we Opening Remarks, June Callwood perpetuating myths & outdated methods?" "Progress since 1948: A Global Review of Human Rights": Chairperson: Verona Edelstein, Acting Director, Dr. Noel A. Kinsella, Chairman, New Brunswick United Nations Social and Humanitarian Affairs Human Rights Commission Division, Department of External Affairs "Human Rights Accomplishments in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Plan.Pdf
    Blair Station 9-34 Maintenance and Storage Facility Track redundancy within the facility will be provided to ensure The proposed Maintenance and Storage Facility is an integral the ability to move LRVs under vehicle or system failure part of the project, as it will: conditions. • House and service all of the trains needed to operate the The preferred site for the Maintenance and Storage Facility has line been determined based on the following criteria: • Service vehicles to be used on future LRT lines • Site Characteristics (topography, grade, land use compatibility, expansion capability and environmental • House the operations control centre (signalling, considerations) communications) for the line • Facility Operations (turnaround loops, track redundancy, • Be the primary heavy maintenance facility for the LRT layout efficiency and municipal services) network Maintenance of the LRVs is crucial to maintain vehicle • System Operations (connectivity to the line, efficiency and manufacturer's warranties, minimize long term operating costs access to freight rail), and and provide for system safety and reliability. The Maintenance • Relative Costs (capital, operating, maintenance and and Storage Facility will accommodate the following elements property ownership and acquisition) on-site: The proposed Maintenance and Storage Facility for the DOTT 9-35 • Main facility building housing offices, roster areas, meeting project will be located on lands to the west of the existing OC rooms and control equipment Transpo headquarters and bus maintenance facility located on • Storage yard for regular cleaning and minor maintenance the north side of Belfast Road, west of St. Laurent Boulevard and south of the VIA rail corridor. In order to access this • Repair areas for heavy and light maintenance areas for location, a connecting track is required between the DOTT vehicles alignment and the Maintenance and Storage Facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Ce Document Est Tiré Du Registre Aux Fins De La Loi Sur Le Patrimoine De L
    This document was retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act Register, which is accessible through the website of the Ontario Heritage Trust at www.heritagetrust.on.ca. Ce document est tiré du registre aux fins de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario, accessible à partir du site Web de la Fiducie du patrimoine ontarien sur www.heritagetrust.on.ca. ,a I LIST OF ENRITAGE PROPERTY DESIGNATIONS - BY.LAI'IS BY-LAW DATE ENACTED ITERITAGE DESIGNATION BY COIJNCIL OF NUItsER September 5, L979. 312 Laurier Avenue East 233-79 ll 78-80 l'lurrav Street 234-79 !t 240 Mcleod Street 235-79 (Victoria ltemori-al l{useum) tt 12 Rideau Street 239-79 (Union Station) il 66 Robert Street 240-79 il 520 Sussex Drive 24L-79 (Ttre Connaught Buil-ding) tl 14 l,Ialler Street 242-79 (Ttre. l'Iarble I'Iorks) I/ BY-LAW i{uMBER .?.s{72 - A by-law of The corporation of the city of ottawa to designate ?8-80 Murray SLreet to be of historic or archi- tectural- value or interest; WHEREAS The Ontario Heritage Act, I974, authorizes the Councj-l of a municipality to enact by-laws to designate real property, including all the builOings and structures thereon, to be of historic or architectural value or interest; AND WHEREAS the council of ?he corporation of the City of Ottawa has caused to be served upon the owner of the Iands and premises known 6 78-80 Murray Street, more parti- cularly described in schedule 'rArr hereto, and uPon the ontario Heritage Foundation, notice of intention to so designate the aforesaid real property and has causeo such notice of intentj-on to be published in The Ottawa Journal newspaper having a gen- eral circulation in the City of Ottawa, once a week for three consecutive weeks, narnely on January 27fi't, February 3rd and February 10th, L979; AND .diiEREA,S the reasons fOr the designation are set out as Schedule rrBrt hereto; AND WI:IEREAS no notice of objection to the said pro- poseo designation has been served upon t]-e clerk of the municipality; THEREFORE tLre council of The corporation of the city of Ottawa enacts as follows: - 1.
    [Show full text]
  • CERTIFICATE of APPROVAL City of Ottawa 110 Laurier Avenue West
    CONTENT COPY OF ORIGINAL Ministry of the Environment Ministère de l’Environnement CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL MUNICIPAL AND PRIVATE SEWAGE WORKS NUMBER 6180-8JKNNV Issue Date: July 22, 2011 City of Ottawa 110 Laurier Avenue West Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Site Location: Somerset Street West Reconstruction Project Somerset Street West (from Preston Street to Booth Street) City of Ottawa You have applied in accordance with Section 53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act for approval of: storm sewers and the establishment of stormwater management Works as part of the Somerset Street West Reconstruction Project, in the City of Ottawa for the collection, transmission, treatment and disposal of stormwater runoff from a total catchment area of 1.8 ha and ultimately 8.4 ha, to attenuate stormwater flows to the allowable release rates as specified by the City of Ottawa, discharging to the existing 1,050 mm diameter storm sewer located along Preston Street, for all storm events up to and including the 100-year return storm, consisting of the following: STORM SEWERS storm sewers to be constructed along Somerset Street West, discharging 470 L/s (1.83 ha drainage area) and 811 L/s (8.4 ha drainage area) via the existing 600 mm diameter storm sewer located along Somerset Street West to the existing 1,050 mm diameter storm sewer located along Preston Street; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WORKS installation of seventeen (17) inlet control devices in catchbasins located along Somerset Street West (from Preston Street to Booth Street), two (2) inlet control devices (CB7
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gouvernementaux Canada
    Public Works and Government Services Travaux publics et Services 1 1 Canada gouvernementaux Canada RETURN BIDS TO: Title - Sujet RETOURNER LES SOUMISSIONS À: COURIER AND FREIGHT SERVICES Bid Receiving - PWGSC / Réception des soumissions - Solicitation No. - N° de l'invitation Date TPSGC E60LM-120020/B 2013-03-05 11 Laurier St. / 11, rue Laurier Client Reference No. - N° de référence du client Amendment No. - N° modif. Place du Portage , Phase III E60LM-120020 006 Core 0A1 / Noyau 0A1 Gatineau, Québec K1A 0S5 File No. - N° de dossier CCC No./N° CCC - FMS No./N° VME Bid Fax: (819) 997-9776 lm001.E60LM-120020 GETS Reference No. - N° de référence de SEAG PW-$$LM-001-62053 Date of Original Request for Standing Offer 2013-01-25 Revision to a Request for a Standing Offer Date de la demande de l'offre à commandes originale Révision à une demande d'offre à commandes Solicitation Closes - L'invitation prend fin Time Zone Fuseau horaire National Master Standing Offer (NMSO) at - à 02:00 PM on - le 2013-03-11 Eastern Standard Offre à commandes principale et nationale (OCPN) Time EST Address Enquiries to: - Adresser toutes questions à: Buyer Id - Id de l'acheteur Jiang, Kevin lm001 The referenced document is hereby revised; unless otherwise indicated, all other terms and conditions of Telephone No. - N° de téléphone FAX No. - N° de FAX the Offer remain the same. (819) 956-3857 ( ) ( ) - Delivery Required - Livraison exigée Ce document est par la présente révisé; sauf indication contraire, les modalités de l'offre demeurent les mêmes. Destination - of Goods, Services, and Construction: Destination - des biens, services et construction: Comments - Commentaires Vendor/Firm Name and Address Security - Sécurité Raison sociale et adresse du This revision does not change the security requirements of the Offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Ibikeibuyweek Scavenger Hunt List
    #IBikeIBuyWEEK Scavenger Hunt List Rules: ñ All scavenger hunt tasks need to be completed during the allotted times ñ Each time you complete a task, tweet it out using the hashtag #IBikeIBuyWEEK ñ Every purchase task needs to be logged into IBikeIBuy.ca ñ You also need to submit to [email protected] a final list of the tasks you completed, with the accompanying photo or video evidence, by the end of the allotted time. Kindly include your name, phone number & e-mail address! #IBikeIBuyDay: The Grand Tour July 22, 10:00am to July 29, 6:00pm – Winner announced at 6:30pm Each task is worth one point, except for the list of bonus tasks at the bottom Buy a local good from Canadian Makers at Maker House Co. See how many Bridgehead delights you can enjoy in one Take a Selfie by the fountain in Confederation Park day Wander back in time at the Cumberland Heritage Village Try to escape from one of Ottawa’s many escape rooms Museum Play some tennis at Tanglewood Park Refresh your Stamina with some Tenacity before you decide to Play the City Hall piano (extra 5 points for Springsteen) wave the White Flag at Tooth & Nail Brewing Company! Take in the ponds, wetlands and forests of Stony Swamp Fuel your Italian pride with a sandwich from DiRienzo’s Enjoy the wandering ivy in Westboro’s Winston Square Take a Selfie in front of the Tin House in the ByWard Market Take a quick stroll through Notre Dame Cathedral Buy a fresh scone from the Scone Witch on Beechwood avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to / Rapport Au : Transit Committee Comité
    3/5/2020 https://app06.ottawa.ca/calendar/ottawa/citycouncil/tc/2009/12-16/ACS2009-ICS-PGM-0214.htm Report to / Rapport au : Transit Committee Comité du transport en commun and Council / et au Conseil 09 December 2009 / 09 décembre 2010 Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipale adjointe, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability/Services d’infrastructure et Viabilité des collectivités Contact Person / Personne-ressource : Vivi Chi, Manager / Gestionnaire, City-wide Transportation Planning / Transports urbain, Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x21877, [email protected] City-wide Ref N°: ACS2009-ICS-PGM-0214 SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN OTTAWA TRANSIT TUNNEL (DOTT) PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY - RECOMMENDED PLAN OBJET : PLANIFICATION ET ÉVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE DU TUNNEL DE TRANSPORT EN COMMUN DANS LE CENTRE-VILLE D’OTTAWA (TTCCVO) - PLAN RECOMMANDÉ REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Transit Committee recommend that Council: 1. Approve the functional design for the Light Rail Transit (LRT) corridor from Tunney's Pasture to Blair Station and the Maintenance and Storage Facility as described in this report and detailed in Document 1. 2. Direct staff to initiate a formal, expedited Environmental Assessment (EA) process based on the approved functional design, and file the Environmental Project Report with the Ministry of the Environment in accordance with Ontario EA Regulation 231/08 for transit projects. 3. Direct staff to begin the property acquisition process as described in this report for subsequent consideration by Committee and Council, subject to funding approval in the 2010 Budget. 4. Direct staff to initiate the preliminary engineering and the procurement management process as described in Document 3, subject to funding approval in the 2010 Budget.
    [Show full text]
  • 150 Laurier Avenue West, Suite 500, Ottawa ON
    FOR LEASE OFFICE SPACE 150 Laurier Avenue West, Suite 500, Ottawa ON Located in downtown Ottawa on the south side of Laurier Avenue West between Elgin Street and Metcalfe Street. Underground and surface parking is available. The building had a major renovation in 2013. The top floor space is approximately 7,348.13 sq. ft. and may be subdivided. There are existing leasehold improvements including kitchen, boardrooms, enclosed offices and open concept areas. Details Area: 7,348.13 sq. ft. Asking Rent: Suite 500 $15.00 per sq. ft. Operating Costs: $12.50 per sq. ft. (2019 Estimate) Underground and Surface Parking Available Major building renovation in 2013 Spaces can be subdivided Full floor available Interior Floor Plan – Suite 500 For more Information Philip Zunder, President Broker of Record 613-725-7170 [email protected] www.decathloncommercial.com The information set out herein, including, without limitation, any projections, images, opinions, assumptions and estimates obtained from third parties (the “Information”) has not been verified by DECATHLON, and DECATHLON does not represent, warrant or guarantee the accuracy, correctness and completeness of the Information. DECATHLON does not accept or assume any responsibility or liability, direct or consequential, for the Information or the recipient’s reliance upon the Information. The recipient of the Information should take such steps as the recipient may deem necessary to verify the Information prior to placing any reliance upon the Information. The Information may change and any property described in the Information may be withdrawn from the market at any time without notice or obligation to the recipient from DECATHLON.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Section 37 and Why Does It Matter? Condo Developments and Community Benefits DICK STEWART Outcome
    THE BUZZ Downsizing your book collection, pg 10 Record season forecast for Plouffe Rink, pg 7 MARCH 14, 2014 VOL. 19 NO. 3 At the heart of Ottawa since 1995 CENTRETOWNBUZZ.COM UZZ B SARAH GEL B ARD / YOW LAB What is Section 37 and why does it matter? Condo developments and community benefits DICK STEWART outcome. facilities and services that would some control over what benefits e frequently hear about In planning jargon, this refers to normally be required by the city. are implemented by identifying lo- City Council approv- a “Section 37 approach.” Section 37 The list of potential benefits in- cal neighbourhood improvements W ing a new condo build- of the Planning Act permits munici- cludes cultural and child care facili- through a Community Design Plan ing with greater height and den- palities to approve projects beyond ties, public art, affordable housing, or other processes. sity than the zoning rules allow. the zoning rules in return for “com- parks, improvements to rapid transit Whatever benefits are created, How does that happen and why? munity benefits.” In other words, stations and conservation measures they must have a planning relation- What most of us do not realize is developers can buy their way to an for energy or environment. ship to the development project. that since 2012, Ottawa has adopted exceptional approval. These ben- Perhaps more significantly, it is a formal approach to promote this efits must be over and above those possible for a community to have (Section 37, pg. 5) Questions and concerns about sex work laws With the old prostitution laws struck down, neighbourhoods ponder impact NEIL MCKINNON provinces and existing laws will re- has to come up with new legisla- tution is not harmful to society.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa's Choice
    MAY 15, 2020 VOL. 25 NO. 5 THE CENTRETOWN BUZZ Health Centre pivots to do more, 3 Skyline: Moments from the City Archives, 6 Advocacy group gives transit riders a voice Alayne McGregor tening, and so you’d have these transit commission ne year ago, fed-up meetings and nobody would public transit riders be speaking for the riders! O in Ottawa formed a Public transit works both group to speak up for better ways. You can have the best service and a better system. transit system in the world In their first successful but if you don’t have the rid- year, the Ottawa Transit Rid- ership to sustain it then it’s ers Association (OTRA) has worthless.” advocated for a fare freeze, Centretown residents should for online booking for Para- get involved in OTRA in order Transpo, and for greater to make OC Transpo less fo- transparency and account- cused on commuting from ability at OC Transpo. downtown to the far suburbs, Stuart MacKay, a found- MacKay said. “We cannot ing OTRA board member create just a commuter ser- who lives in Centretown, told vice. We need to develop a The BUZZ that OC Transpo service where transit is not has had a paternalistic rela- the last option but is actually tionship with its riders where the first option for people to it “basically says we’re doing get from point A to point B.” this–and like it or lump it.” In Centretown, he said, OTRA has a different vi- it’s the local routes like the sion: that riders are Transpo’s 6 or 7 or 11 that are impor- biggest resource.
    [Show full text]