DOCSLIB.ORG

Shaw-House-Conservation-Area-Management-Plan-Mar-2020.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shaw-House-Conservation-Area-Management-Plan-Mar-2020.Pdf Insert front cover. Project Title: Shaw House and Church Conservation Area Management Plan Client: West Berkshire Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked Approved by by 4 December Final Draft Report Graham Keevil John Kate Ahern 2018 Adams Inez Williams Michelle Statton Katie Luxmoore Alex Hardie-Brown 5 November Draft Final Graham Keevil John 2019 Adams Inez Williams Michelle Statton Katie Luxmoore Alex Hardie-Brown 6 November Second Draft Final Graham Keevil John 2019 Adams Inez Williams Michelle Statton Katie Luxmoore Alex Hardie-Brown 7 March Final Graham Keevil John Kate Ahern 2020 Adams Inez Williams Michelle Statton Katie Luxmoore Alex Hardie-Brown Final_Shaw House Conservation Area Management Plan Mar 2020.docx Last saved: 10/03/2020 10:57 Contents 1 Executive summary 1 2 Introduction 3 How to use the Conservation Area Management Plan 3 Main sources 3 Consultation process 4 Acknowledgements 4 3 Historic development 5 Phase I 1581 - 1618 — Thomas Dolman and his son Thomas Dolman II 7 Phase II 1618 - 1666 — Humphrey Dolman 7 Phase III c 1666 - 1697 — Thomas Dolman III 8 Phase IV 1697 - 1711 — Changes made by Sir Thomas Dolman IV 8 Phase V 1728 - 1744 — James Bridges, 1st Duke of Chandos 8 Phase VI 1751 – 1800 — Joseph Andrews 12 Phase VII 1800 - 1851 — Shaw House gardens in the first half of the 19th Century 15 Phase VIII 1851 – 1905 — The Eyre Family 16 Phase IX 1906 - 1939 — The Farquhar Family 18 Phase X 1939 - 1979 21 Phase XI 1980 – onwards 23 4 Shaw House and Church Conservation Area 24 Summary of information 24 The Conservation Area 24 Natural characteristics 27 Legislation and policy context 31 Current land use and management 34 Summary of key considerations 37 5 Archaeology 38 Method 38 Previous research 38 Known archaeological features and heritage assets 40 Aerial and historic photographs 43 LiDAR coverage 47 Summary of key considerations 50 6 Buildings and structure 52 7 Ecology 55 Biodiversity Action Plan 55 Nature conservation designations 55 Key habitats 57 Species 59 Summary of key considerations 60 8 Landscape 62 Understanding the physical surroundings 62 Views and visual relationships 63 Artistic/literary and cultural associations and representations 66 Summary of key considerations 67 9 Visitor experience and infrastructure 68 Approaches and access 68 Visitor arrival and facilities 73 Waymarking and interpretation 75 Summary of key considerations 76 10 Significance 78 Evidential 78 Historical 80 Aesthetic 81 Communal 81 Ecological 82 11 Issues and opportunities 84 Location of the Conservation Area Boundary 97 12 Future management 99 Overall strategy for Shaw House 99 13 Character areas 130 1: Shaw House and Garden 132 2: The Old Rectory, gardens and Church Road 135 3: Private ownership wet woodland 137 4: Park 139 5: Wet woodland and river (SSSI and SAC) 142 6: School buildings 145 7: School sports grounds 147 8: St Mary’s Church and Graveyard 149 14 Implementation and review 152 Implementation 152 Circulation 152 Monitoring and review 152 Appendix 1 154 Glossary 154 Appendix 2 156 References 156 Appendix 3 158 Analysis of historic trees 158 Appendix 4 186 Shaw House listing description 186 Appendix 5 191 Shaw House Conservation Area Management Plan Historic Environment Record 191 Assessment of significance 208 Ecology policy and legal considerations 212 Tables Table 4.1 Summary of information ................................................................................................ 24 Table 7.1 Statutory Designated Sites with 2km and Non-statutory Designated Sites within 1km of Shaw House Conservation Area ............................................................................................................. 56 Table 12.1 Welcoming place ....................................................................................................... 101 Table 12.2 Health, safe and secure ............................................................................................. 104 Table 12.3 Well maintained and clean ......................................................................................... 105 Table 12.4 Environmental management ....................................................................................... 107 Table 12.5 Biodiversity, landscape and heritage ........................................................................... 109 Table 12.6 Community involvement ............................................................................................ 122 Table 12.7 Marketing and communication .................................................................................... 126 Table A3.1 Results of 2003 Tree Survey, West Berkshire Council .................................................... 158 Table A5.2 Shaw House and Church Conservation Area Management Plan HER table ......................... 192 Figures Figure 3.1 Chronology of Shaw House ............................................................................................. 6 Figure 3.2 Section from map of Speen, 1729, surveyed by William Godson (West Berkshire Museum NEBYM:1991.83). ......................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 3.3 Development of Shaw: 1729 Map of Speen showing the arrangement of the great gardens. 11 Figure 3.4 Plan for the house and gardens in 1750 by Joseph Andrews. (West Berkshire Museum : NEBYM:T217)................................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 3.5 20th Century trees along the remnants of Andrews 18th Century Lime tree lined avenue. ...... 13 Figure 3.6 Development of Shaw House: 1750 by Joseph Andrews showing the single canal and the great gardens. .................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 3.7 Engraving by Laytons of Shaw House 18th Century.......................................................... 15 Figure 3.8 First Edition Ordnance Survey Berkshire XXXV 1883 ©NLS (2018). ................................... 16 Figure 3.9 Development of Shaw House: 1st Edition OS 1870’s ......................................................... 17 Figure 3.10 Shaw House Development: 2nd Edition OS Map .............................................................. 19 Figure 3.11 Second Edition Ordnance Survey Berkshire XXXV. 1900 ©NLS (2018). ............................. 20 Figure 3.12 Third Edition Ordnance Survey Berkshire XXXV. 1913 ©NLS (2018). ................................ 20 Figure 3.13 Shaw House Development: 3rd Edition OS Map .............................................................. 22 Figure 4.1 Location plan .............................................................................................................. 25 Figure 4.2 Site features ............................................................................................................... 26 Figure 4.3 Geology...................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 4.4 Topography of Shaw .................................................................................................... 29 Figure 4.5 Water bodies............................................................................................................... 30 Figure 4.6 Heritage and Natural Designations ................................................................................. 33 Figure 4.7 Gym class at Shaw House school ................................................................................... 34 Figure 4.8 Site Ownerships .......................................................................................................... 36 Figure 5.1 Archaeological features ................................................................................................ 42 Figure 5.2 Part of a photograph taken in July 1924 of Newbury looking north-east. ............................. 43 Figure 5.3 These are extracts from a pair of photograph taken in April 1948, again with the centre of Newbury as the main focus but with Shaw in the background . ......................................................... 44 Figure 5.4 This low-level oblique photograph from 1952 shows the former well house area still undeveloped, but with a new access off Church Road. ..................................................................... 45 Figure 5.5 Vertical aerial photographs taken on 2 December 1943. ................................................... 46 Figure 5.6 Vertical aerial photographs taken on 18 January 1947. ..................................................... 46 Figure 5.7 Vertical aerial photographs taken on 26 September 1958. ................................................ 46 Figure 5.8 Vertical aerial photographs taken on 13 June 1967. ......................................................... 46 Figure 5.9 Vertical aerial photograph taken on 26 May 1978. ........................................................... 46 Figure 5.10 LiDAR 1m Digital Terrain Model. .................................................................................. 49 Figure 6.1 Grade I listed Shaw House ............................................................................................ 54 Figure 6.2 Former stables and workshop........................................................................................ 54 Figure 6.3 St Mary’s Church ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Descendants of Thomas MERRIMAN DE WYTTNEYE
    Descendants of Thomas MERRIMAN DE WYTTNEYE Ivor Jones Table of Contents .Descendants . of. .Thomas . MERRIMAN. DE. .WYTTNEYE . .1 . First. .Generation . .1 . Source. Citations. .3 . Second. .Generation . .5 . Source. Citations. .7 . Third. Generation. .9 . Source. Citations. .13 . Fourth. Generation. .15 . Source. Citations. .26 . Fifth. .Generation . .27 . Source. Citations. .36 . Sixth. Generation. .37 . Source. Citations. .47 . Seventh. .Generation . .49 . Source. Citations. .71 . .Name . .Index . .73 . Produced by Ivor Jones Descendants of Thomas MERRIMAN DE WYTTNEYE First Generation 1. Thomas MERRIMAN DE WYTTNEYE was born in 1510 in Witney, , Oxfordshire, England1 and died on 22 Jul 1559 in Witney, , Oxfordshire, England1 aged 49. General Notes: Thome Mirrima De Wyttneye Thomas Myrrima or Merryman, Weaver, probably born before 1500, Marrid Johanne or Jone, who was Executrix of his Will, and by her had issue-- Gregorii John Jamys Jone Alys Marie [? "Mr. Merriman of Oxfordshire."] "Testametor Thome Mirrima. Pashe De Wyttneye. In the name of God amen. The XXIIII daye of Noveber ano dmi 1558 I Thomas Myrrima sicke of bodie but hole and pfett of myd do make my last will in maner and forme folweng first I bequethe my soule to god and my bodie to be buried in the churche yard of Wyttney I give and bequief to Johanne my wyfe the Lease and racke of my house wherein I dwell to her dweringe the terme of years ex in the same Lease specifiede. If hit may please god to cotnue her lyffe so longe in this pnte worlde I will that my sonne Gregorie shall have holde occupie and enjoye quietly all that my house wheerat Peter Norigge my sonne in lawe nowe dwellythe with the garding grownde to the sayd house belonginge.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Impact of Groundwater Abstractions on Low River Flows
    FRIEND: Flow Regimes from International Experimental and Network Data (Proceedings of the Braunschweig Conference, October 1993). IAHS Publ. no. 221, 1994. / / Modelling the impact of groundwater abstractions on low river flows BENTE CLAUSEN Department of Earth Sciences, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade, Denmark ANDREW R. YOUNG & ALAN GUSTARD Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OXW 8BB, UK Abstract A two-dimensional numerical groundwater model was applied to the Lambourn catchment in the UK to predict the impact of ground­ water abstraction on low river flows for a representative Chalk catch­ ment. The calibration of the model using observed streamflow and groundwater data is described. A range of abstraction scenarios was simulated to estimate the impact of long term abstraction on monthly river flows as a function of the abstraction rate, seasonality and location. Relationships between low flow statistics and abstraction regimes were derived by analysing a number of simulated hydrographs. INTRODUCTION This paper evaluates the influence of long term groundwater abstractions on low river flows for different abstraction scenarios and different distances from the river using a two-dimensional numerical groundwater model. The objective of the study was to develop a simple numerical model of a typical Chalk catchment which could be used for a sensitivity analysis of the impact of groundwater pumping on streamflow with respect to abstraction regimes. The study is a contribution to the development of regional procedures for providing simple relationships between groundwater pumping and low flows. The study area is the Lambourn catchment on the Berkshire Downs, UK, which lies on the unconfined Chalk aquifer. The Chalk is the major aquifer in the UK both in areal extent and in the quantity and quality of water extracted from it.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIDDLES FARM WOODSPEEN • Nr NEWBURY
    PRIDDLES FARM WOODSPEEN • Nr NEWBURY PRIDDLES FARM WOODSPEEN • Nr NEWBURY PRIDDLES FARM WOODSPEEN • Nr NEWBURY An outstanding Georgian style house in a superb setting Accommodation Ground Floor: Entrance hall • Drawing room • Dining room Sitting room • Kitchen/breakfast room • Cloakroom Lower Ground Floor: Boot room • Hall • Family room Wc • Utility room • 2 store rooms First Floor: Master bedroom suite • 2 further bedroom suites Bedroom 4 • Bathroom Second floor: Bedroom/sitting room and shower room Cottage Sitting room • Kitchen • 2 bedrooms • Shower room Garage block 3 garages • Workshop • Office Stabling • Barn • Swimming pool Garden and grounds In all about 10.046 acres (4.065 ha) The Property Priddles Farm is an outstanding Georgian house The accommodation is well laid out and beautifully and constructed in 2014 to an exceptionally high standard. It is tastefully presented. From the entrance hall, a glazed door an individually designed house that combines the classic leads directly ahead to the dining room with double doors look with modern easy living. Great care has been taken opening to the terrace beyond. To one side of the hall is the in using handmade bricks, windows and doors, and high drawing room with a Bath stone open fireplace fitted with a quality materials throughout. Light and spacious with Jetmaster, and views on three sides looking over the garden. generous ceiling heights, Priddles Farm is a comfortable, To the other side of the hall is a comfortable and cosy sitting practical and stylish family home. room/tv room, also with an open fireplace. The kitchen/breakfast room is spectacular and partly vaulted and opens out with bi-folding doors on the south elevation to the sheltered terrace.
    [Show full text]
  • RIVER KENNET Status: Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)
    COUNTY: BERKSHIRE/WILTSHIRE SITE NAME: RIVER KENNET Status: Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) notified under Section 28 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 Local Planning Authorities: Berkshire County Council, Wiltshire County Council, Newbury District Council, Kennet District COuncil National Grid Reference: SU203692 to SU572667 Ordnance Survey Sheet 1:50,000: 174 1:10,000: SU26 NW, SU27 SW, SU27 SE, SU37 SW, SU36 NW, SU36 NE, SU47 NW, SU46 NE, SU56 NW, SU56 NE Date Notified (Under 1981 Act): 1 November 1995 Date of Last Revision: Area: 112.72 ha Other information: The River Lambourn, which is a tributary of the River Kennet, is also an SSSI. There are two existing SSSIs along the River Kennet: Freemans Marsh and Chilton Foliat Meadows. The site boundary is the bank top or, where this is indistinct, the first break of slope. Description and Reasons for Notification The River Kennet has a catchment dominated by chalk with the majority of the river bed being lined by gravels. The Kennet below Newbury traverses Tertiary sands and gravels, London Clay and silt, thus showing a downstream transition from the chalk to a lowland clay river. As well as having a long history of being managed as a chalk stream predominantly for trout, the Kennet has been further modified by the construction of the Kennet and Avon Canal. In some places the canal joins with the river to form a single channel. There are also many carriers and channels formerly associated with water meadow systems. The river flows through substantial undisturbed areas of marshy grassland, wet woodland and reed beds.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Landscape Character Areas and Their Special Qualities and Features of Significance
    Historic Landscape Character Areas and their special qualities and features of significance Volume 1 Third Edition March 2016 Wyvern Heritage and Landscape Consultancy Emma Rouse, Wyvern Heritage and Landscape Consultancy www.wyvernheritage.co.uk – [email protected] – 01747 870810 March 2016 – Third Edition Summary The North Wessex Downs AONB is one of the most attractive and fascinating landscapes of England and Wales. Its beauty is the result of many centuries of human influence on the countryside and the daily interaction of people with nature. The history of these outstanding landscapes is fundamental to its present‐day appearance and to the importance which society accords it. If these essential qualities are to be retained in the future, as the countryside continues to evolve, it is vital that the heritage of the AONB is understood and valued by those charged with its care and management, and is enjoyed and celebrated by local communities. The North Wessex Downs is an ancient landscape. The archaeology is immensely rich, with many of its monuments ranking among the most impressive in Europe. However, the past is etched in every facet of the landscape – in the fields and woods, tracks and lanes, villages and hamlets – and plays a major part in defining its present‐day character. Despite the importance of individual archaeological and historic sites, the complex story of the North Wessex Downs cannot be fully appreciated without a complementary awareness of the character of the wider historic landscape, its time depth and settlement evolution. This wider character can be broken down into its constituent parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambourn Parish Council
    LAMBOURN PARISH COUNCIL The Memorial Hall, Oxford Street, Lambourn, Berkshire. RG17 8XP Telephone: 01488 72400 Clerk: Mrs Karen Wilson Assistant Clerk: Mrs Ann McMath email: [email protected] SUMMONS TO A VIRTUAL MEETING OF THE FULL COUNCIL ON WEDNESDAY 6th MAY 2020 AT 7:30 PM VIA ZOOM. Present: Cllr Billinge-Jones, Cllr Riggall, Cllr Cocker, Cllr Bulbeck Reynolds, Cllr Rowlinson, Cllr McKay, Cllr Nims, Cllr Snowden, Cllr Jones, Cllr Rees, Cllr N. Spence and Mrs Wilson (clerk). 17 Members of the public. 19:32 start. Cllr Billinge-Jones welcomed everyone to the first virtual meeting of the Parish Council. 1 ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND VICE-CHAIRMAN LGA S4 (1) Following the Coronavirus Act 2020 and subsequent Local Government and Police and Crime Commissioner (Coronavirus) (Postponement of Elections and Referendums) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020, no elections will take place in 2020. The elected official will remain in their posts until 2021. Acceptance of apologies for absence Schedule 12 of the Local Government Act 1972 requires a record to be kept of the members present and that this record form part of the minutes of the meeting. Members who cannot attend a meeting should tender apologies to the Parish Clerk as it is usual for the grounds upon which apologies are tendered also to be recorded. Under Section 85(1) of the Local Government Act 1972, members present must decide whether the reason(s) for a member's absence are accepted. Apologies: Cllr E. Spence, Cllr J. Bracey and Cllr Marks. Cllr Billinge-Jones assumed that by councillors connecting, this indicated acceptance of the first virtual meeting [Prior to the meeting the Clerk raised concerns over validity of this meeting, with both the Chairman and vice-chairman, due not constitutional changes being made by Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennet Catchment Management Plan Kennet Catchment Management Plan
    Kennet Catchment Management Plan Kennet Catchment Management Plan Second edition June 2019 ARK Draft Revision July 2012 Kennet Catchment Management Plan Acknowledgements All maps © Crown copyright and database rights 2012. Ordnance Survey 100024198. Aerial imagery is copyright Getmapping plc, all rights reserved. Licence number 22047. © Environment Agency copyright and/or database rights 2012. All rights reserved. All photographs © Environment Agency 2012 or Action for the River Kennet 2012. All data and information used in the production of this plan is owned by, unless otherwise stated, the Environment Agency. Note If you are providing this plan to an internal or external partner please inform the plan author to ensure you have got the latest information Author Date What has been altered? Karen Parker 21/06/2011 Reformat plus major updates Karen Parker 23/07/2011 Updates to action tables plus inclusion of investigations and prediction table. Mark Barnett 25/01/2012 Update of table 9 & section 3.1 Scott Latham 02/02/2012 Addition of Actions + removal of pre 2010 actions Scott Latham 16/02/2012 Update to layout and Design Charlotte Hitchmough 10/07/2012 ARK revised draft. Steering group comments incorporated. Issues 1, 2, 3 and 4 re-written. New action programmes and some costs inserted. Tables of measures shortened and some moved to Issue Papers. Monitoring proposals expanded. Charlotte Hitchmough 30/8/2012 Version issued to steering group for discussion at steering group meeting on 25th September 2012. ARK revisions following discussion with EA on 7th August 2012. Charlotte Hitchmough 18/12/2012 Final 2012 version incorporating all comments from partners, revised front cover and new maps.
    [Show full text]
  • East Garston and Eastbury: Two Lambourn Villages
    point your feet on a new path East Garston, Eastbury Two Lambourn Villages Distance: 10½ km=6½ miles easy walking Region: Berkshire Date written: 19-aug-2013 Author: MacMeadow Last update: 21-sep-2021 Refreshments: East Garston, Eastbury Map: Explorer 158 (Newbury) but the map in this guide should suffice Problems, changes? We depend on your feedback: [email protected] Public rights are restricted to printing, copying or distributing this document exactly as seen here, complete and without any cutting or editing. See Principles on main webpage. Woodland, meadows, views, historic villages In Brief This is a walk through two of West Berkshire's prettiest villages beside the River Lambourn, with two good pubs, at least one terrific view of the Lambourn valley and the Downs, gentle meadows and woodland. It begins on a Roman road, appropriately since this area was settled by them. The Plough in Eastbury serves excellent lunches at reasonable hours; to enquire, ring 01488-71312. ? There are a some patches of nettles in high summer, many avoidable if you have a stick. Strong sensible shoes or trainers should be adequate. There are one or two stiles on the return from Eastbury which are not suited to a large dog because they have no gap or dog gate. The walk begins in Ermin Street in the village of Woodlands St Mary , near Hungerford, Berkshire, just off the M4 motorway, postcode RG17 7ST. At the start of the village, look for a side lane with a signpost on the right for Eastbury . Park on the grass verge here, preferably a short way along just before a house on the left.
    [Show full text]
  • River Lambourn SAC SSSI – Catchment Risk Assessment
    Natural England Water Quality Catchment Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Lambourn Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment RIVER LAMBOURN CATCHMENT FINAL DRAFT MAY 2017 © Natural England 2016 1 Natural England Water Quality Catchment Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Lambourn BLANK PAGE 2 Natural England Water Quality Catchment Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Lambourn Westcountry Rivers Limited (the commercial arm of Westcountry Rivers Trust) are working with Natural England to develop a method for catchment-wide pollution risk and source apportionment assessment. The collaborative approach to developing these assessments will act to facilitate the sharing of data, knowledge and local information with catchment stakeholders and Catchment Based Approach (CaBA) Partnerships. The Integrated Catchment Based Approach was developed as a framework by Defra in 2009 for improving the water environment at the catchment scale. After a successful pilot phase in 2011, actions were made for the wider adoption and national implementation of CaBA from 2013. As Rivers Trusts now represent catchments across a large part of England and Wales, with new ones continually forming, they are responsible partner hosts for the majority of local CaBA initiatives around the United Kingdom. Key objectives of CaBA are: to deliver positive and sustained outcomes for the water environment by promoting a better understanding of the environment at a local catchment scale;and to encourage local collaboration and more transparent decision-making when both planning and delivering activities to improve the water environment. CaBA allows local communities, businesses, organisations and other stakeholders to come together to undertake actions or develop projects which incorporate local priorities such as compliance, flood risk management, fisheries and biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambourn Emergency Plan
    Lambourn Emergency Plan IF YOU ARE IN IMMEDIATE DANGER CALL 999 COMMUNITIES PREPARED building resilient communities in Berkshire Version 0.1 – February 2015 Community Emergency Plan Template Contents 1. Plan Details ................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................................................................... 4 3. Emergency Actions ................................................................................................................... 7 4. Communications ....................................................................................................................... 9 5. Community Emergency Coordination Centre ...................................................................... 11 6. Local Rest Centres & places of safety ................................................................................... 12 7. Local Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................. 13 Appendix A – Emergency Contact List ............................................................................................... 14 Appendix B – Draft Community Emergency Team Meeting: First Meeting Agenda & Minutes Template ................................................................................................................................... 15 Appendix C – Emergency Log Sheet .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BIAG News No 33, Winter 2014 Editor: John Coulson
    BERKSHIRE INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP BIAG News No 33, Winter 2014 Editor: John Coulson http://www.biag.org.uk READING INDUSTRIES (PART 1) - NOVEMBER 17, 2014. David Cliffe Last year, I gave a talk about industry along the Kennet – which had its origins when BIAG was thinking about running walks round the former industrial sites in Reading for members of the public during Heritage Open Days. I suggested a boat trip along the Kennet, since that was where a lot of the industry was. BIAG wasn’t sure about this rather expensive idea, but I got the Library to finance it, and we ran it three times. The BIAG talk, based on the leaflet I produced to give to the boat trippers, was enthusiastically received, and I was there and then invited back to cover some more of Reading’s industries in 2015. It has been a great pleasure for me to do the research and put the talk together over the summer, and again, the talk was received with great enthusiasm, and I was, to say the least, pleased. I saw that people were scribbling down what I was saying, and offered to send out my lecture notes to anyone who wanted, to spare them the trouble. Then the newsletter editor said he’d like to publish them. And so now, I feel I should explain that this is not a finished article: they’re just the notes I had handy in case I “dried up” during the talk. I tried not to look at them, and to talk to the audience rather than to a piece of paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Table Name History
    SPACES Awards and President’s Dinner 2019 Table Names Bailey Francis Baily https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Baily Francis Baily (28 April 1774 – 30 August 1844) was an English astronomer, born In Newbury. He is most famous for his observations of "Baily's beads" during an eclipse of the Sun. Baily was also a major figure in the early history of the Royal Astronomical Society, as one of the founders and president four times. Blagrave John Blagrave https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Blagrave John Blagrave of Reading (d. 1611) was an English Tudor mathematician, astronomer and designer of astronomical and mathematical instruments. His astrolabe designs, which he described in his writings, were advanced for Britain. He devoted himself to mathematical study and was called, by Anthony à Wood, "the flower of mathematicians of his age". Brunel Isambard Kingdom Brunel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isambard_Kingdom_Brunel Isambard Kingdom Brunel FRS (9 April 1806 – 15 September 1859), was an English mechanical and civil engineer who is considered "one of the most ingenious and prolific figures in engineering history". He designed an unusual station plan for Reading and several other stations on the line. As Reading at that time was only to the south of the station, he decided that both trains to London and to Bristol would stop on the side nearest the town. This meant that London bound trains had to cross the path of Bristol ones twice to stop at the station, but did mean that passengers did not have to cross the line as there was only one platform.
    [Show full text]