DOCSLIB.ORG

5 Municipal Solid Waste

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5 Municipal Solid Waste STRATEGIC EVALUATION ON ENVIRONMENT AND RISK PREVENTION UNDER STRUCTURAL AND COHESION FUNDS FOR THE PERIOD 2007-2013 Contract No. 2005.CE.16.0.AT.016. National Evaluation Report for Estonia Main Report Directorate General Regional Policy A report submitted by in association with Mrs. Evija Brante Mr. Stijn Vermoote ELLE ECOLAS nv Skolas street 10-8 Lange Nieuwstraat 43, Riga, LV-1010 2000 Antwerp Estonia Belgium TEL TEL +32/3/233.07.03 [email protected] [email protected] Date: November 10th, 2006 GHK Brussels Rue de la Sablonnière, 25 B-1000 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2 275 0100; Fax : +32 (2) 2750109 GHK London 526 Fulham Road London, United Kingdom SW6 5NR Tel: +44 20 7471 8000; Fax: +44 20 7736 0784 www.ghkint.com Strategic Evaluation of Environment and Risk Prevention – Country Report – Estonia TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY................................................................................ 2 2 OVERVIEW AND HORIZONTAL ISSUES............................................................................... 4 2.1 Country overview ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Status of implementing the EU Environmental Acquis .......................................................... 4 2.3 State of the environment........................................................................................................6 2.4 Environmental policy.............................................................................................................. 6 2.5 Overview of national environmental expenditure................................................................... 7 2.6 Relationship of the overall environmental strategy(ies) to wider Objective 1 and 2 Programme Strategies. ................................................................................................................... 8 3 WATER SUPPLY...................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Current situation..................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Needs................................................................................................................................... 17 4 WASTE WATER .....................................................................................................................28 4.1 Current situation................................................................................................................... 28 4.2 Needs................................................................................................................................... 33 5 MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE .................................................................................................. 39 5.1 Current situation................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 Needs................................................................................................................................... 44 6 RENEWABLE ENERGY......................................................................................................... 52 6.1 Current situation................................................................................................................... 52 6.2 Needs................................................................................................................................... 55 7 NATURAL RISK MANAGEMENT (FIRE, DROUGHT, FLOODS)......................................... 62 7.1 Current situation................................................................................................................... 62 7.2 Needs................................................................................................................................... 64 8 CROSS FIELDS PRIORITY ASSESSMENT.......................................................................... 67 8.1 Part 1: summarising the needs assessment........................................................................ 67 8.2 Part 2: Assessing priorities within fields............................................................................... 74 8.3 Part 3: Assessing priorities across Fields ............................................................................ 82 9 ANNEXES............................................................................................................................... 91 9.1 Key figures current situation ................................................................................................ 93 9.2 Unit investment and operating costs.................................................................................. 103 9.3 Annexes chapter 5 Priority assessment............................................................................. 109 10 REFERENCE LIST ............................................................................................................. 125 10.1 Literature and online information ..................................................................................... 125 10.2 Interviews ......................................................................................................................... 127 Strategic Evaluation of Environment and Risk Prevention – Country Report – Estonia EXECUTIVE SUMMARY See separate document. GHK, ECOLAS, IEEP, CE 1 Strategic Evaluation of Environment and Risk Prevention – Country Report – Estonia 1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY This report is a part of the project “Strategic Evaluation on Environment & Risk Prevention Under Structural & Cohesion Funds for 2007-2013”, European Commission project No. 2005.CE.16.0.AT.016, attributed to GHK in association with ECOLAS – Environmental Consultancy and Assistance, IEEP – Institute for European Environmental Policy, and Cambridge Econometrics. The project’s overall aim is to provide the strategic evaluation of the needs and priorities for environmental investment under the structural and cohesion funds for the period 2007-2013. It covers 5 fields of environmental investment: water supply, waste water treatment, municipal solid waste, renewable energy sources and natural risk management. In order to identify and evaluate needs in the selected fields, and to select investment priorities for the Structural and Cohesion Funds for the 2007 – 2013 period, the project analyses the current situation in each field and the financial allocations during the current programming period (2000-2006). The regional scope of the project is 15 countries, comprising the 10 new Member States (NMS) plus Bulgaria, Romania and 3 ‘old’ cohesion Member States (Greece, Portugal and Spain). This report focuses on Estonia and was prepared by the ELLE - Estonian, Latvian & Lithuanian Environment Ltd. and ECOLAS nv. The methodology implemented for preparing this report consisted in collaboration between a core team, who provided guidelines, and the several national evaluators to guarantee the consistence across the national reports. Each country reported back to the core team at each step in the research project and got feedback on how to proceed with the work. The executive summary is presented in a separate document, as it can be read and will be used as a stand-alone document. There is an initial chapter on horizontal issues, then for each field the following sections are presented: overview and needs. Priority assessment across fields is provided. The overview sections review the available information in Estonia in each field. The information was drawn from EU information, national reports, field-specific databases, various field specific reports regarding the environmental situation in Estonia and available investment plans. Key stakeholders in each field were also contacted and in some cases provided additional information. Although there are some information asymmetries between the fields, each overview assesses the current state of provision and infrastructures, the institutions involved, the past investment plans and their funding by Community support programmes in the relevant field. The needs chapters assess the needs for environmental investment over the period 2007-2013, taking into account the requirement to ensure compliance with the environmental acquis (the body of environmental regulations and directives), the consistency between environmental and other policies and priorities, and where applicable, the regional development benefits. The needs chapters aim to indicate the main policy objectives and targets for each field and, if possible, to quantify physical investment needs based on legislative environmental requirements, demand estimations and scenarios, the current state of infrastructure and the possibility of complementary flanking measures (such as user charges) which might reduce the GHK, ECOLAS, IEEP, CE 2 Strategic Evaluation of Environment and Risk Prevention – Country Report – Estonia need for investment. However, such complete information was rarely available, either because it was not disclosed or because it simply did not exist. Here the information asymmetries between fields are larger. The priority assessment draws on the information gathered about the current situation and the identified needs to provide an independent assessment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Baltic Republics
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES THE BALTIC REPUBLICS A Strategic Survey Erkki Nordberg National Defence College Helsinki 1994 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Kalevi Ruhala Editorial Assistant: Matti Hongisto Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Mikko Viitasalo, National Defence College Dr. Pauli Järvenpää, Ministry of Defence Col. Antti Numminen, General Headquarters Dr., Lt.Col. (ret.) Pekka Visuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 266 FIN - 00171 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 6 THE BALTIC REPUBLICS A Strategic Survey Erkki Nordberg National Defence College Helsinki 1992 ISBN 951-25-0709-9 ISSN 0788-5571 © Copyright 1994: National Defence College All rights reserved Painatuskeskus Oy Pasilan pikapaino Helsinki 1994 Preface Until the end of the First World War, the Baltic region was understood as a geographical area comprising the coastal strip of the Baltic Sea from the Gulf of Danzig to the Gulf of Finland. In the years between the two World Wars the concept became more political in nature: after Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania obtained their independence in 1918 the region gradually became understood as the geographical entity made up of these three republics. Although the Baltic region is geographically fairly homogeneous, each of the newly restored republics possesses unique geographical and strategic features.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover the Coast of North-Western Estonia!
    Discover the coast of north-western Estonia! Coastal hiking trail The Baltic Coastal Hiking Route is part of the E9 long-distance hiking trail which stretches all the way from Portugal to Narva. In Lääne-Harju Keila-Joa Lohusalu Türisalu municipality the trail is divided into six one-day trips, covering Nõva-Vihterpalu, Vihterpalu-Padise, Padise-Paldiski, Paldiski-Kersalu, Kersalu- Photo: Egle Kaur  ³ Laulasmaa, Laulasmaa-Vääna-Jõesuu but, of course, everyone can hike a distance that is suitable for them, whatever the length and Lohusalu ® location. Look out for white-blue-white markings and enjoy the hike. 1  Pakri lighthouse 1 2 Lighthouses Photo: Visit Estonia  The tallest lighthouse in the Baltics is Pakri lighthouse, measuring 52m high, but there is also another working lighthouse in Lääne- Meremõisa Harju municipality. Surprisingly you can find it in the bell tower of St Matthias Church in Harju-Madise. 7 3 2 Adra 12 Waterfalls 13 9 4 3 4 Lääne-Harju municipality is rich in waterfalls. The Keila waterfall, the Treppoja waterfall, and the Türisalu cascades are well Laulasmaa  known even for visitors who come from farther away, but when the water levels are high the beauty of a waterfall can also 2 3 Keila Falls be admired at Uuga, Pakri, Leetse, and the Kersalu cliffs on the coast. Photo: Kalev Laast ® Net shed of Kase Ants 5 5 1  Käesalu Beaches   4 5 There is no official beach in Lääne-Harju municipality, but there is an amazingly large selection of beautiful sandy Pakri Bank beaches on which you can enjoy the sun and take a dip in the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration Regarding Nutrient Load Reductions in the Baltic Sea Catchment Area
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto The Finnish Environment 524 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Ain Lääne, Heikki Pitkänen, Berit Arheimer, Horst Behrent,Waldemar Jarosinski, Sarmite Lucane, Karin Pachel, Antti Räike, Alexander Shekhovtsov, Lars M. Svendsen and Simonas Valatka Evaluation of the implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration regarding nutrient load reductions in the Baltic Sea catchment area ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE The Finnish Environment 524 Ain Lääne, Heikki Pitkänen, Berit Arheimer, Horst Behrendt, Waldemar Jarosinski, Sarmite Lucane, Karin Pachel, Antti Räike, Alexander Shekhovtsov, Lars M. Swendsen and Simonas Valatka Evaluation of the implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration regarding nutrient load reductions in the Baltic Sea catchment area HELSINKI 2002 FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE The Report is available in the Internet: http://www.vyh.fi/eng/orginfo/publica/electro/fe524/fe524.htm This Project has received funding from the Commission of the European Communities (the European Commission), Helsinki Commission and the Finnish Ministry of the Environment The views expressed in this report represent the opinions of the authors alone, and not necessarily the views of the Commission of the European Communities (European Commission) and the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission. The Commission of the European Communities is not liable for any use that may be made of the information of this report. The Finnish Environment Institute. Evaluation of the implementation of the 1988 Ministerial Declaration regarding nutrient load reductions in the Baltic Sea catchment area. The Finnish Environment 524, Helsinki, 2002. Information included in this publication or extracts therefore are free for citing on the condition that the complete reference of the publication in given as stated above.
    [Show full text]
  • Kanalisatsiooni Arendamise Kava Aastateks 2009- 2021
    Sangaste valla ühisveevärgi ja –kanalisatsiooni arendamise kava aastateks 2009- 2021 1. SISSEJUHATUS 5 2. SISUKOKKUVÕTE 6 2.1 Elanikkond ......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Asulate investeeringuprojektid ........................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Keeni asula investeeringud ............................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Lossiküla investeeringud ................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Sangaste aleviku investeeringud ........................................................................ 8 2.2.4 Sangaste valla investeeringuprojektide kokkuvõte ............................................. 8 2.3 Pikaajalise investeeringuprogrammi maksumus ................................................. 9 2.3.1 Maksumuse arvutamise alused .......................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Projektide maksumus ......................................................................................... 9 3. ÜVK ARENDAMISE KAVA KOOSTAMISE LÄHTEANDMED 10 3.1 Õiguslik baas ................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Valga maakonna planeering ............................................................................ 11 3.3 Sangaste valla üldplaneering ........................................................................... 12 3.4 Reovee ärajuhtimise suublad ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Katian (Late Ordovician) Reefs Near Saku, Northern Estonia and the Age of the Saku Member, Vasalemma Formation
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2014, 63, 4, 271–276 doi: 10.3176/earth.2014.30 The early Katian (Late Ordovician) reefs near Saku, northern Estonia and the age of the Saku Member, Vasalemma Formation Björn Krögera, Linda Hintsb, Oliver Lehnertb–d, Peep Männikb and Michael Joachimskic a Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 13, Helsinki, Finland; [email protected] b Institute of Geology at Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia c Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schlossgarten 5, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany d Department of Geology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden Received 15 July 2014, accepted 13 October 2014 Abstract. Reefs developed simultaneously during the latest Sandbian/earliest Katian global Guttenberg Isotopic Carbon Excursion (GICE) in several places across Baltoscandia. Latest Sandbian/earliest Katian patch reefs are also described from the Vasalemma Formation of northern Estonia. The Saku Member of the Vasalemma Formation was previously considered as a proximal facies related to the reefs. However, the Saku Member clearly post-dates the GICE interval and ranges from the latest Keila to Rakvere in terms of regional stages. Some small reefs occur in direct proximity to the stratotype of the Saku Member. New δ13C data from the stratotype section and the adjacent reefs indicate that these reefs developed before the deposition of the Saku Member during the GICE interval. The chemostratigraphic data support the hypothesis of a short-time Baltoscandian reef growth event that terminated during the GICE interval. Key words: carbon isotopes, GICE excursion, Kope excursion, Ordovician reefs, Oandu Stage, Estonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Enumeratio Renovata Coleopterorum Fennoscandiae, Daniae Et Baltiae“ Coleoptera Catalog
    Sahlbergia 21.2 (2015), 6-39 6 Estonian Additions to Silfverberg’s „Enumeratio renovata Coleopterorum Fennoscandiae, Daniae et Baltiae“ Coleoptera Catalog Uno Roosileht A faunistic list which updates H. Silfverberg’s “Enumeratio renovata Coleopterorum Fennoscandiae, Daniae et Baltiae” with respect to Coleoptera in Estonia is presented. The data is from specimens in the collection of the Estonian Museum of Natural History and from specimens collected by the author. The material were collected by hand, using nets and sifters and in recent years also using window and pitfall traps. The Estonian section of Silfverberg’s catalogue is updated with 308 species. – Sahlbergia 21(2): 6–39. Uno Roosileht. Estonian Museum of Natural History, Lai 29A, Tallinn 10133, ESTONIA, +372 5516547; e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Coleoptera, faunistic list, Estonia Introduction H. Silfverberg’s catalogue of Coleoptera “Enumeratio 1961, Haberman 1962, Freude et al. 1964, 1967, 1971, renovata Coleopterorum Fennoscandiae, Daniae et Bal- 1974, Haberman 1968, Kryzhanovskii 1965, Miländer tiae” was published in 2010, containing distribution data 1978, Voolma et al. 1997, Heliövaara et al. 2004, 2014) for beetle species in Finland (F), Karelia (K), Sweden (S), were used to determine the species. Different catalogs, Norway (N), Denmark (D), Latvia (A), Lithuania (I) and checklists, lists and articles (Burakowski et al. 1978, 1979, Estonia (E). The collection of the Estonian Museum of 1980, 1981, 1986, 1990, 2000, Ferenca et al. 2002, Telnov Natural History contains species, collected in Estonia be- 2004, Telnov et al. 2007, 2008, Süda 2009, Silfverberg fore 2010, whose data have not been previously published, 2010, 2014, Tamutis et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Noorsoopolitseinike Nimekiri Koolidega.Xlsx
    PÕHJA PREFEKTUUR Õppeasutus Noorsoopolitseinik Kontakt Aegviidu Kool Jaana Kuuspalu 6125562, 53359346 [email protected] Alavere Põhikool Jaana Kuuspalu 6125562, 53359346 [email protected] Ardu Kool Eleri Kontkar 6124658, 56660840 [email protected] Aruküla Põhikool Eleri Kontkar 6124658 ,56660840 [email protected] Aruküla Vaba Waldorfkool Eleri Kontkar 6124658; 56660840 [email protected] Audentese Erakool Siiri Sepa/Kerli Kaupmees 6125758 [email protected]/[email protected] Avatud kool Inna Boitsova 6124237; [email protected] Audentese Spordigümnaasium Siiri Sepa/Kerli Kaupmees 6125758 [email protected]/[email protected] EBS Gümnaasium Inna Boitsova 6124237; [email protected] Eesti Esimene Erakosmeetikakool Inna Boitsova 6124237 [email protected] Eesti Hotelli‐ ja Turismikõrgkool Õnne Merilo 6125433 [email protected] Eesti Rahvusvaheline Kool Lee‐Britt Laidna 6125430 lee‐[email protected] Ehte Humanitaargümnaasium Vitali Matvejev 6125408 [email protected] Erakool Garant Anželika Fedoruk 6124175 [email protected] Erakool Läte Jevgenia Arm 6124522 [email protected] Eurogümnaasium Marko Pilder 6125756 [email protected] Georg Otsa nimeline Tallinna Muusikakool Reelika Niklas 6124296 [email protected] Gustav Adolfi Gümnaasium Marlen Miilaste marlen.miilaste@politsei,ee; 6124275 Õnne Merilo [email protected], 6125433 Haabersti Vene Gümnaasium Anastassija Eier 6125678 [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Vasalemma Valla Imago Kohalike Õpilaste Hulgas Bakalaureusetöö
    Tartu Ülikool Sotsiaal- ja haridusteaduskond Ajakirjanduse ja kommunikatsiooni instituut Vasalemma valla imago kohalike õpilaste hulgas Bakalaureusetöö Koostaja: Kadri Kaldur Juhendaja: Aune Past MA Tartu 2011 SISUKORD SISUKORD................................................................................................................................ 2 SISSEJUHATUS........................................................................................................................ 3 1. TEOREETILISED JA EMPIIRILISED LÄHTEKOHAD ................................................ 5 1.1 Imago definitsioon...................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Imago kujunemine...................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Imago uuringud ........................................................................................................ 10 1.4 Asukohaturundus...................................................................................................... 11 1.5 Vasalemma valla tutvustus....................................................................................... 16 1.5.1 Valla sümboolika: ............................................................................................ 16 1.6 Valla panus noorsootöösse....................................................................................... 17 2. METOODIKA JA VALIM.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • YEARBOOK PRIIT SAUK, Director General, Road Administration
    YEARBOOK PRIIT SAUK, Director General, Road Administration Dear yearbook readers, The mission of the Road Administration is to develop a safe, functioning and economic traffic environment. The 101st year in the history of the Road Administration passed in an instant and was very busy for all employees and officials. There is reason to be proud of our achievements, but we are also apprehensive ADMINISTRATION ROAD about the future. Many thanks to every colleague and partner as well as every client for their commitment! It has been a year of stable work. 2019 was antee the people of Saaremaa a bigger and In addition to structural changes, the cooper- historically the best year in terms of the mon- more comfortable aircraft for connection ation between divisions and departments still etary volume of the preservation and repair with the continent. requires some practice and the review and of public roads. In total, we used 149 million specification of some processes. Fortunately, euros for the preservation and 83.4 million 2019 can be considered a breakthrough year customer-focused thinking, describing ser- euros for the development of the road net- in the development of the organisation. As vices on the basis of process management work. The yearbook also gives information we are preparing the next step on the road principles and constant improvement are on the number of kilometres covered by the to becoming the Mobility Administration or coded into the DNA of the Road Administra- works and the most exciting objects. the Transport Administration, we carried tion. Service owners have mostly understood out a significant structural reform as of 1 their roles and we’re improving and optimising The satisfaction of the customers of our May 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kaali Crater Field and Other Geosites of Saaremaa Island (Estonia): the Perspectives for a Geopark
    Geologos, 2010, 16 (1): 59–68 doi: 10.2478/v10118-010-0004-z The Kaali crater field and other geosites of Saaremaa Island (Estonia): the perspectives for a geopark Anto Raukas 1 & Wojciech Stankowski 2 1 Institute of Ecology, Tallinn University, Uus-Sadama 5, 10120 Tallinn, Estonia;e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Geology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Maków Polnych 16, 61-606 Poznan, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Island of Saaremaa in Estonia offers highly spectacular geological features that belong to the most interesting in the Baltic Sea area. A unique geological monument on the island is the Kaali meteorite–crater field, formed by nine meteori- te impacts. There are also attractive coastal cliffs, huge erratics, alvars (limestone areas covered by a very thin soil) and well-developed glacial and marine landforms. Limestone cliffs and shingle beaches abound with Silurian fossils and offer great opportunities to fossil collectors. The island is a prospective geopark. During the past few years, the geology of the island has become an intensely studied object of Estonian and Polish geologists. Keywords: geopark, geosites, meteorite–crater field, Saaremaa Island, Estonia Introduction opment. Worldwide importance has the Kaali crater field, the first one in Europe of which The Island of Saaremaa (Ösel in German this origin was scientifically proven by finds and Swedish) is one of the largest islands in of meteoritic iron. The geological/morphologi- the Baltic Sea, measuring 2,673 km2. It belongs cal characteristics of the island, in combina- to the West Estonian Archipelago. The island tion with the peculiar flora and fauna, together has a low population density, with only about with the archaeological, historical and cultural 40,000 people.
    [Show full text]
  • Jõgeva Maakonnaplaneering
    KEHTESTATUD Jõgeva maavanema 01.12.2017 korraldusega nr 1-1/2017/305 Tellija Jõgeva Maavalitsus Suur tn 3, 48306 Jõgeva Tel 776 6333 www.jogeva.maavalitsus.ee Konsultant Skepast&Puhkim OÜ Laki 34, 12915 Tallinn Tel 664 5808 www.skpk.ee JÕGEVA MAAKONNAPLANEERING JÕGEVA MAAKONNAPLANEERING 2030+ Algatatud: 18.07.2013 Vastu võetud: 22.04.2016 Kehtestatud: 01.12.2017 2 / 80 JÕGEVA MAAKONNAPLANEERING 2030+ SISUKORD I MAAKONNAPLANEERING SISSEJUHATUS ............................................................................................................... 5 1. JÕGEVAMAA RUUMILINE ARENG ......................................................................... 8 1.1. Ruumilise arengu põhimõtted ja suundumused .......................................................... 8 1.2. Ruumilise arengu analüüsi kokkuvõte ja planeeringulahenduse põhjendused ............... 10 2. ASUSTUSSTRUKTUUR JA ASUSTUSE SUUNAMINE .............................................. 11 2.1. Toimepiirkonnad ja keskuste võrgustik .................................................................... 11 2.1.1. Toimepiirkonnad .................................................................................................. 12 2.1.2. Toime- ja tugi-toimepiirkondade vööndid ................................................................ 17 2.1.3. Toime- ja tugi-toimepiirkondade sidustamine ........................................................... 18 2.1.4. Keskuste võrgustik ............................................................................................... 19 2.1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • (26.08.2016) Ülevaade Ühinemismenetluste, Piiride Mu
    Käimasolevad KOV-ide ühinemismenetlused ja piiride muutmise ettepanekud (26.08.2016) Ülevaade ühinemismenetluste, piiride muutmise ja konsultatsioonide algatamistest ja keeldumistest, mille osas on tehtud volikogu otsused ning teavitatud ministeeriumi. Kokku: 67, lisaks 2 piiride muutmise ettepanekut Üle 11 000 elaniku: 24 (sh kattuvad ettepanekud) Läbirääkimistega nõustunud/ettepaneku teinud/saanud omavalitsuste arv: 187 Ühinemist plaanivad Elanike arv Km2 Läbirääkimiste seis omavalitsused 01.01.2016 Harjumaa Saue vald 10 451, Saue vald 4 km2, Saue linn 5867, Saue linn 195 km2, 1. Saue vald, Saue linn, Kernu 2040, Kernu 175 km2, Kernu vald, Nissi Ühinemistaotlus kinnitatud. Nissi 2884 Nissi 265 km2 vald Kokku 21 242 Kokku 639 km2 Paldiski linn tegi ettepaneku jaan 2016. Paldiski 3886, Paldiski 60 km2, Padise vald nõustus. Padise vald peab läbirääkimisi Vasalemma 2. Paldiski linn, Padise Padise 1733 Padise 367 km2 ja Nõva vallaga. vald NB! puudub ühine piir. Padise vald tõi Mõlemad nõustusid Keila valla Kokku 5619 Kokku 427 km2 nõustumisotsuses välja vajaduse tegeleda ettepanekuga. ühise piiri otsimise võimalustega. Aegviidu 718, Aegviidu 12 km2, 3. Aegviidu vald, Anija Anija 5618 Anija 521 km2 Aegviidu vald tegi ettepaneku jaan 2016. vald Anija vald nõustus. Kokku 6336 Kokku 533 km2 Keila linn tegi 31.05.2016 ettepaneku Harku valla Kumna küla ja Tutermaa küla, Keila valla Karjaküla alevik, Kulna küla, Valkse küla ja Lehola küla ning Saue valla Valingu küla, Aila küla ja Tuula küla ühendamiseks Keila linnaga. Saue, Keila vald ja Harku vald keeldusid. NB! Piiride muutmise ettepanek. Kuusalu 6597, Kuusalu 708 km2, 4. Kuusalu vald, Loksa Loksa 2746 Loksa 4 km2 Kuusalu vald tegi ettepaneku 29.06.2016.
    [Show full text]