Pochodzenie Kamienia Użytego Do Budowy Wybranych Twierdz Na

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pochodzenie Kamienia Użytego Do Budowy Wybranych Twierdz Na Problemy Słowa kluczowe: twierdza, fort, dzę w Nysie, położoną w kotlinie, kamień, Srebrna Góra, Nysa w pewnej odległości od masywów górskich. Materiał do badań był dwoja- Wprowadzenie kiego rodzaju. Jeżeli pozwalała na to Jedną z cech krajobrazu Pasma sytuacja w terenie i nie prowadziło to Sudetów jest duża liczba dobrze za- do uszkodzeń zabytku, z poszczegól- chowanych zabytków nowożytnych nych miejsc twierdz pobierano nie- fortyfikacji. Okres budowy, a na- wielkie próbki kamieni do dalszych stępnie modernizacji tych umocnień badań laboratoryjnych. Badania te przypada na czas wojen śląskich polegały na makroskopowej analizie (1740–1763) i trwał aż do lat 60. strukturalno-teksturalnej oraz mikro- XIX wieku. Głównymi punktami tego skopowej analizie petrograficznej. zespołu były następujące twierdze: W przypadku niemożności pobrania Świdnica, Srebrna Góra, Kłodzko próbek odpowiednie analizy prze- i Nysa. Z tego okresu pochodzi też prowadzano bezpośrednio na obiek- znaczna liczba małych dzieł obron- cie. Odrębną część badań stanowiły nych na terenie Kotliny Kłodzkiej analizy porównawcze materiału oraz przełęczy i wzgórz broniących zebranego w terenie z posiadaną do niej dostępu. Obecnie, te ciągle bazą danych materiałów skalnych jeszcze nie w pełni rozpoznane, Dolnego Śląska. imponujące budowle i tajemnicze ruiny należące głównie do pruskiej szkoły fortyfikacji, stanowią atrakcję Twierdza Srebrna Góra turystyczną, odróżniającą region Trzecia wojna śląska zakoń- Dolnym Śląsku Dolnym Kłodzka od innych, również boga- czyła się w 1763 r., a zawarty w Hu- tych w zabytki obszarów Polski. bertusburgu pokój między Austrią Jest rzeczą naturalną ze wzglę- i Prusami przesądził o przynależno- du na lokalizację tych twierdz, że ści większej części Śląska i hrabstwa Pochodzenie kamienia kamienia Pochodzenie użytego do budowy twierdz wybranych na Jerzy Potyrała Lorenc, W. Marek głównym materiałem budowlanym kłodzkiego do państwa pruskiego. wykorzystanym przy ich wznoszeniu Król pruski Fryderyk II Wielki nie był kamień. Celem badań było stwier- zapomniał o doświadczeniach wy- Origin of Stone dzenie jaki to był materiał i skąd nikających z wcześniejszych wojen pochodził. Dodatkowo przeanalizo- śląskich i postanowił ufortyfikować Used to Build wano, czy urobek pozyskiwany był Przełęcz Srebrną, leżącą w pobliżu na miejscu względnie w najbliższej Srebrnej Góry. Decyzja króla poważ- Selected okolicy, czy też sprowadzano go nie zaważyła na dalszych losach tej z dalszej odległości. Do badań wy- miejscowości oraz w gwałtowny spo- Fortresses brano typową twierdzę górską, czyli sób zmieniła krajobraz tego miejsca. in Lower Silesia Twierdzę Srebrna Góra oraz twier- Warownia miała zostać wybudowana 4 4/2013 Key words: fortress, fort, stone, fortress, i.e. the Srebrna Góra Fortress, brought a major part of Silesia and Srebrna Góra, Nysa and the fortress in Nysa, which is lo- the County of Kłodzko under Prussian cated in a valley some distance from control. Prussian King Frederick II a mountain range. decided to use the experience gained Introduction Two types of research evidence from the Silesian Wars and fortified Well-preserved, historical mod- were obtained. If it was possible in the Silver Pass located near Srebrna ern fortifications are one of the the field and no damage was done Góra. The King’s decision had a sig- characteristic features of the Sudetes. to the historical monument, small nificant impact on the subsequent The strongholds were built and later samples of stone were collected fate of this place and dramatically modernized during the Silesian Wars from individual fortresses for fur- changed the landscape. The strong- (1740–1763) and building periods ther laboratory testing. This testing hold was to be built on the hills sur- continued until the 1860’s. The ma- involved performing macroscopic rounding the Silver Pass. The major jor strongholds in the Sudetes chain structural and textural analysis and task was to block passage in the event include the following fortresses: microscopic petrographic analysis. If of attack. Together with the fortresses Świdnica, Srebrna Góra, Kłodzko, it was impossible to collect samples, in Nysa, Kłodzko, and Świdnica, this and Nysa. A significant number some testing was performed directly fortress was part of a tight series of of small fort defences around the on site. A comparative analysis was borderline fortifications and it closed Kłodzko Valley; the passes and hills subsequently done on the research the gap between the Kłodzko and protecting access to the valley date material collected in the field and Świdnica Fortresses. In 1764, the back to that period, too. The impres- a database of rock materials from project was commissioned to the sive structures and the intriguing ruins Lower Silesia. Prussian Lieutenant Colonel Ludwig that have not yet been particularly Wilhelm Regeler [Felkel 2005]. well-studied represent primarily the The main complex of fortresses Prussian school of fortress construc- The Fortress was to occupy Srebrna Góra (686 tion. The fortresses are tourist at- in Srebrna Góra mamsl), and it was designed as tractions that distinguish Kłodzko a string of forts stretching along the from other regions of Poland that The Third Silesian War ended in east-west line. The fortress’s central also have an abundance of historical 1763, and the peace Treaty of Huber- point of defence was a Keep that was monuments. tusburg between Austria and Prussia surrounded by five bastions: Upper, The location of the fortresses made stone materials the obvious major resources used for building. The purpose of this research was to find out what material was used and where it came from. Additionally, research was done on whether the stone mate- rial was mined on site or nearby, or whether it was transported from more places further away. The research involved studying a typical mountain Ryc. 1. Obiekty obronne na terenie Twierdzy Srebrna Góra (oprac.: M.W. Lorenc, J. Potyrała na podstawie ryciny Bleyla, Felkel 2005) Fig. 1. Defence fortifications in the Srebrna Góra Fortress (prepared by: M.W. Lorenc, J. Potyrała based on a drawing by Bleyl, Felkel 2005) 4/2013 5 na wzgórzach otaczających Przełęcz między Chochołem Wielkim i Fortem z paleozoicznych łupków, piaskow- Srebrną. Do jej głównego zadania Wysoka Skała wynosiła około 3 km. ców kwarcytowych oraz zlepieńców należałoby blokowanie przełęczy Zajmująca przeszło 100 ha [Lorenc i in. 2006]. w razie wojny. Razem z twierdzami twierdza srebrnogórska, nazywana Mury twierdzy srebrnogórskiej w Nysie, Kłodzku i Świdnicy miała na początku XX wieku ,,Śląskim w większości wykonano z lokalnie tworzyć zwarty pas sudeckich fortyfi- Gibraltarem”, jest wyjątkowym występującego materiału skalnego, kacji granicznych oraz wypełnić lukę zabytkiem sztuki fortyfikacyjnej pozyskiwanego podczas niwelowania między twierdzą kłodzką i świdnicką. w skali Europy. Stanowi przykład wierzchołków wzniesień i przygoto- W 1764 r. realizację projektu zleco- nowożytnej, przełęczowej warowni wywania podłoża pod budowę twier- no pruskiemu ppłk Ludwigowi Wil- górskiej. Układ i poszczególne ele- dzy. Jądro murów stanowiły bloki ka- helmowi Regelerowi [Felkel 2005]. menty twierdzy pozostały właściwie mienne większego formatu, związane Główny zespół forteczny zaj- niezmienione do naszych czasów, co zaprawą wapienną, podczas gdy miał mować miał Górę Srebrną (686 m jest niezwykle rzadkim przypadkiem. i drobniejszą frakcję wykorzystywaną n.p.m.), a zaprojektowano go jako Przestrzenna forma budowli nie ma do formowania przeciwstoków. Lico ciąg fortów w kierunku wschód–za- odpowiednika w twierdzach, które skarp układano z dopasowanych do chód. Centralnym punktem obrony powstawały w kręgu mecenatu króla siebie bloków kamienia o nieregular- twierdzy był Donżon, który otaczało Prus Fryderyka II ani w innych forty- nym kształcie, lecz gładkiej ściance pięć bastionów: Górny, Kleszczowy, fikacjach z jego epoki, ani z czasów licowej, tworzących szczelną i równą Dolny, Nowowiejski i Miejski wraz następnych. Powstanie twierdzy mia- powierzchnię (ryc. 2). z nadszańcem, tzw. Kawalierą, oraz ło również ogromne konsekwencje Wprawdzie materiał budow- usytuowany przed nimi rawelin. krajobrazowe. lany zastosowany do konstrukcji Na wschód od Bastionu Dolnego murów twierdzy jest odporny na de- umiejscowiono esplanadę, a dalej strukcyjne działanie wody, to jednak Fort Wysoką Skałę. Na zachód od Materiał skalny użyty niezbyt dobrej jakości wapno, użyte Bastionu Górnego zlokalizowano do budowy fragmentu do zapraw, utraciło siłę wiążącą. drugą esplanadę i Fort Rogowy. Po W warstwowej strukturze murów przeciwnej stronie przełęczy, na srebrnogórskiej brak było elementów, kotwiących Ostrogu (627 m n.p.m.), usytuowa- twierdzy oblicówkę w jądrze murów. W dol- no samodzielny Fort Ostróg (ryc. 1) nej partii skarp montowano dłuższe [Felkel 2005]. Rejon Srebrnej Góry charakte- bloki, pełniące funkcję wsporników, W kierunku zachodnim roz- ryzuje się skomplikowaną budową rozmieszczone w sporych odstę- lokowane zostały kolejne dzieła geologiczną, ponieważ Przełęcz pach od siebie. Takie rozwiązanie obronne twierdzy noszące nazwę Srebrna leży w strefie kontaktowej niwelowało parcie ciężaru całego Chochoły. Wśród wybudowanych dwóch odmiennych wiekowo i lito- oblicowania na podnóże kamienne- tutaj obiektów fortecznych można logicznie jednostek geologicznych, go płaszcza skarpy. Wynikiem przy- wymienić: Redutę Skrzydłową, Ba- reprezentowanych tu przez zróżni- jęcia takiej technologii jest jednak terię Kazamatową, Baterię Tarasową, cowane masywy
Recommended publications
  • 254 Double Treaties Ended the Seven Years'
    #254 Double Treaties ended the Seven Years’ War – The Seven Years’ War was a continuation of the War of the Austrian Succession We have learned fully of the French and Indian War / Seven Years’ War double. Now we are going to add yet another double having to do with the Seven Years’ War. The Seven Years’ War is considered to be the second of two wars that go together in history, (1) the War of the Austrian Succession and (2) the Seven Years’ War. They are entirely connected. In Unsealing #208 The Ten Horns of Daniel 7:7 – The Cause of the Seven Years’ War, you might recall that a cause of the Seven Years’ War was that the ruler of Austria, Maria Theresa, desired to recover lost territory from Prussia. Prussia had seized northern Silesia from Austria in 1742, in the War of the Austrian Succession. Key Understanding: The Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) is considered by historians to be a continuation of the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-1748). They are double wars. In the War of the Austrian Succession (1740- 1748), Prussia seized northern Silesia from Austria. A major cause of the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) was Austria desiring to get Silesia back. The wars for Silesia were a major part of the larger wars, the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-1748) and the Seven Years’ Russia War (1756-1763). Germany Austria took over Silesia in 1526, but in 1742, Silesia Prussia seized northern Silesia from Austria in the First Silesian War (1740-1742), which was a part of the larger War of the Austrian Succession.
    [Show full text]
  • War of the Austrian Succession.Docx
    War of the Austrian Succession The War of the Austrian Succession was a conflict that took place from 16 December 1740 to 18 October 1748 between the various European powers of the time. The conflict was not restricted to Europe, but also spilled into their colonial holdings in Asia. The war established Prussia as a regional hegemon for years to come, altering the very balance of power in Europe. In India, the rivalry between Britain and France in the Austrian War of Succession resulted in the First Carnatic War. This article will give further details about the War of the Austrian Succession within the context of the UPSC Exams. What was the reason behind the War of the Austrian Succession? The pretext for the war came when a succession crisis happened upon the death of the Habsburg Emperor Charles VI in 1740. To understand how this crisis happened, one must keep in mind the following events: ● In 1703, a Mutual Pact of Succession was agreed upon. It stated that should the male line of the Habsburgs become extinct, the female line would take precedence. ● In this case, the female line referred to the heirs of the elder brother of Charles VI, Emperor Joseph I. ● But the Salic law excluded women of the royal family from inheriting the throne. But if the various Habsburk territories and the Imperial Diet granted approval, then exceptions would be made. ● Emperor Joseph's death in 1711 left two potential female heirs, Maria Josepha and Maria Amalia. But in April 1713, the Pragmatic Sanction was issued by Charles, which allowed female inheritance by the progeny of Charles VI.
    [Show full text]
  • HOHENFRIEDEBERG, JUNE 4Th 1745
    HOHENFRIEDEBERG, JUNE 4th 1745 RULES hexes of a unit are its zone of control. Flipped units do not have a zone of control. Units have to stop as soon as they enter an Setup enemy zone of control. Units may not move from one zone of Place alternately one unit of a side beginning with the Austrians/Saxons; Prussian control hex to another in one turn. units (white) in hexes with grey circles, Austrian units (yellow) in hexes with Attack: The target must be within the attacker’s range in hexes. Other units yellow circles and Saxons (black/yellow) in hexes with black circles. block line of sight. If a unit is in an enemy zone of control, it may Counters only attack units in whose zone of control it is. Roll one six-sided die Values on the counters are: and add the attacker’s combat value. If two units attack the same combat - bb range target on the same turn, their two combat values may be added to movement d defence one single die roll. If the total is equal or greater than the target’s Terrain defence value, the target is flipped over and, if possible, it has to thick black border: may not be crossed retreat one hex (choice of defender) away from the attacker/s but thick grey border: stop movement after crossing; no attack after crossing not into an enemy zone of control. If the target was flipped already, grey centre dot: add 2 to unit’s defence; unit does not have to retreat (but it it is eliminated.
    [Show full text]
  • Hohenzollern Prussia: Claiming a Legacy of Legitimacy
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 2015 Hohenzollern Prussia: Claiming a Legacy of Legitimacy Jeremy Brooks Weed Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Weed, Jeremy Brooks, "Hohenzollern Prussia: Claiming a Legacy of Legitimacy" (2015). University Honors Theses. Paper 177. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.185 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. P a g e | 1 Hohenzollern Prussia: Claiming a Legacy of Legitimacy By Jeremy Brooks Weed P a g e | 2 Table of Contents I. Introduction to the Hohenzollerns of Prussia II. Historical Perspectives and a Divided Discourse III. Brandenburg to Prussia IV. The Politics Religion and the International Norms of the 17th and 18th Century V. The Holy Roman Empire and the Internal Politics of Dynastic Claims VI. International Norms of the Early Modern Era and the Relationship of Dynastic Claims VII. The House of Hohenzollern and the Foundations of Prussian Dynastic Claims VIII. The Reign and Achievements of Elector Frederick William IX. From Prince to King the Reign of Frederick I X. King Frederick William I takes Stettin and Centralizes the State XI. From Claims to Prussian Territory: How Frederick II Settled the Claims XII. Conclusion XIII. Works Cited XIV. Appendix A: Maps of Prussia P a g e | 3 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The War in Germany
    The War in Germany ......................................1 Prelude .......................................................1 THE WAR IN GERMANY Origin of the Pragmatic Sanction ........1 PRELUDE Lighting the Fuse ................................2 “If peace had lasted beyond 1740, [the soldiers] would Of States and Dynasts.................................4 probably now have rouge and beauty spots.” Prussia................................................4 Frederick the Great Austria................................................5 The War of the Austrian Succession was very much to the France ................................................7 Seven Years War what the Great War was to the Second World The Maritime Powers........................ 11 War. Like the Great War, those in the know saw it coming. Like the Great War, it proved unstoppable. Like the Great War, Hanover............................................ 13 some welcomed it as a purge of the European body politic. It Saxony .............................................. 14 was the first ancien régime cabinet war to blend old style Bavaria............................................. 15 dynastic ambitions with the rising ideology of State Nationalism. Erbfolgekrieg in Deutschesland ................ 17 Officially, the War lasted from December 16th, 1740 until Gott Mit Uns..................................... 17 October 18th, 1748, ultimately involving all the important Wiener Blut....................................... 22 European powers. It was not a single conflict. Its flames
    [Show full text]
  • The AVALON HILL
    Volume 20, Number 3 2 99 iiiiiOiiiiiiiiiiiiiiOiiiiiiiii~11 *The AVALON HILL 1.:..1iiiiiOiiiiiiiiiiiiiiOiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiAiiiiiiiiYiiiiiiiiaiiiiiiiiloiiiiiiii"iiiiiiiiHiiiiiOiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiilPiiiiiOiiiiiiiiihliiiiiiiioloiiiiiiiisiiiiiiiiOiiiiiiiiPiiiiiiiihiiiiiiiiYiiiiiiiiPiiiiiiiiaiiiiiiiifiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ADVANCED SQUAD LEADER (hereafter re­ beyond mere reorganization and that the rules and GENERAL ferred to as ASL) will occupy all my time until its tactics employed countless times in the past may The Game Players Magazine printing. The title itself is something of a no longer apply. ASL will require careful scrutiny misnomer, and does not do justice to the effort by veteran and novice players alike; those expect­ The Avalon HIli GENERAL ,s ded,cated to the presenta­ lion of authoritative arllcles On the strategy, taclies, and being expended on it, the connotation of "Ad­ ing to use it merely as a handy reference book to a vanation of Avalon Hdl wargames. HISlOrtCa! articles are vanced" suggesting that it is more difficult than system already learned will be surprised by the included only Insomuch as they provide useful backgfOund the original but not essentially different. While it is extent of inherent change. InformatIon on current Avalon HIli tilles The GENERAL IS true that ASL in all its depth may well be more The looseleaf binder format planned is a first published by the Avalon Hill Game Company solely for the cultural edification of the serious game aficionado, in the complicated than the basic SL game, it is our in­ for Avalon Hill and acknowledges the ills of a con­ hopesof improving the game owner's proficiencyof play and tention that it be far simpler in application than the stantly evolving system. Although we would like providing serVices noi otherwise available to the Avalon Hill whole of its predecessors' parts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuius Regio? REGIO Ideological and Territorial Cohesion of Silesia Vol
    CUIUS Cuius regio? REGIO Ideological and Territorial Cohesion of Silesia vol. 3 eds Lucyna Harc, Przemysław Wiszewski, Rościsław Żerelik Silesia under the Authority of the Hohenzollerns (1741–1918) (1741–1918) Silesia under the Authority of Hohenzollerns vol. 3 Silesia under the Authority This volume contains a collection of studies which are the product of research of the Hohenzollerns (1741–1918) on the formation of Silesia as a region in the period 1740-1918. It is another portion of the summary of research undertaken by a team of Polish historians in conjunction with their participation in the programme of the European Science Foundation entitled Cuius regio. An analysis of the cohesive and disruptive forces determining the attachment and commitment of (groups of) persons to and the cohesion within regions. The project’s assumptions were for original analyses to be conducted on five factors significant in the functioning of the region: administration (Paweł Jaworski), economy (Teresa Kulak), social groups (Wanda Musialik and Dorota Schreiber-Kurpiers), ethnic issues (Dorota Schreiber-Kurpiers) and the national and cultural identity of the region’s inhabitants (Teresa Kulak). In each of the spheres analysed in this book, what has been demonstrated is the prevalence of disintegrating factors in the region from the period of its seizure by the armies of Frederick II until the conclusion of World War I. Top-down efforts undertaken by the authorities aimed at integrating the region with the Prussian state, and then with the Reich, did not fully achieve their objectives. The split into the two sub-regions of Upper and Lower Silesia would seem to be inevitable, in spite of particular unifying elements, particularly in the economic sphere during the second half of the 19ʰ and beginning of the 20ʰ century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seven Years War Operations
    The Seven Years War Operations This document lists all the scenarios included with the game, in the main game folder, their description and number of turns. The first grouping (26) is the scenarios specifically focused for play against the A/I. Sripts are in place for both sides of the A/I specific scenarios, but some scenarios are noted as best played from one side or the other. The second grouping (52) is all of the scenarios with variants and hypothetical situations included. 001.Lobositz-AI - October 1, 1756 - 54 turns The Battle of Lobositz - Faced with the prospect of Russia and Austria launching a coordinated war against him in 1757, Frederick decided to launch a war to protect his conquest of Silesia in the fall of 1756. His first move was to isolate the Saxon army at Pirna. An Austrian relief army under Browne advanced to try to rescue the besieged Saxons. Frederick moved to drive off Browne, and on the morning of October 1, he faced what he thought to be the rearguard of Browne's retreating army near Lobositz. However, Browne was not retreating and he had his army in a very strong position. While Frederick held the field at the end of the day, he was served notice that the Austrians had improved greatly since the Second Silesian War. 002.Reichenberg-AI - April 21, 1757 - 20 turns The Battle of Reichenberg - When Frederick advanced into Bohemia to start the 1757 campaign the Austrians were still trying to gather their troops. One of those isolated corps, that of Count von Koenigsegg tried to delay a force of Prussians under Bevern at Reichenberg.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Nations.Txt 3/25/2010 the Most Famous Ruler of This Country Won The
    12_Nations.txt 3/25/2010 The most famous ruler of this country won the Battle of Velbuzd in 1330 and married a princess of the nation defeated there, Helen. Theodore Metochites arranged the marriage of the five-year-old princess Simonis to one ruler of this country. One ruler of this country changed his title after capturing Serres, and a despot of Serres, John Ugljesa (oog-lye- sha), joined his brother in defeat at the battle of Chernomen. That leader, Vukashin, had a son who died at the battle of Rovine while allied with Mircea (meer-chuh) the Old of Wallachia. The most famous ruler of this land had the sobriquet "Silni," promulgated the Zakonik and allied with the Byzantine pretender John Cantacuzenus before conquering Albania and Macedonia. That king was succeeded by his son Urosh, and himself succeeded his father Milutin. Famously ruled by Stefan Dushan, under prince Lazar Hrebeljanovic it would suffer defeat by the Ottomans at the field of Kosovo. FTP, name this country whose modern day capital is Belgrade. Answer: Serbia (08Terrapin) This kingdom broke the treaty of Tudilen when its king James I conquered Caudete and Villena. This kingdom was founded by the son of Sancho the Great, Ramiro I, who added to it the counties of Sobrarbe and Ribagorza. In 1591, Felipe II invaded this kingdom so as to suppress a revolt there. Alfonso V of this kingdom conquered Naples and Sardinia in the 15th century, and Alfonso I conquered Zaragoza, which became its capital. Its fueros were abolished by the Nueva Planta decrees of Philip V, as punishment for siding with Charles VI in the War of the Spanish Succession.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carl Friedrich Goerdeler-Kolleg of the Robert Bosch Stiftung Lux, Markus (Ed.); Schuch, Gereon (Ed.); Pötter, Jula (Ed.)
    www.ssoar.info The Carl Friedrich Goerdeler-Kolleg of the Robert Bosch Stiftung Lux, Markus (Ed.); Schuch, Gereon (Ed.); Pötter, Jula (Ed.) Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerk / collection Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: SSG Sozialwissenschaften, USB Köln Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Lux, M., Schuch, G., & Pötter, J. (Eds.). (2008). The Carl Friedrich Goerdeler-Kolleg of the Robert Bosch Stiftung (DGAP-Bericht, 11). Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V. https://nbn- resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-129712 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of East Central Europe from the Middle Ages to the Present
    THE PRICE OF FREEDOM 2nd Edition THE PRICE OF FREEDOM 2nd Edition A History of East Central Europe from the Middle Ages to the present Piotr S.Wandycz London and New York First published 1992 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 First published in paperback 1993 Second edition first published 2001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 1992, 2001 Piotr S.Wandycz All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Libtrary Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN 0-203-41740-2 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-72564-6 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-25490-6 (Hbk) ISBN 0-415-25491-4 (Print Edition) (Pbk) In memoriam Oscar Halecki and Hugh Seton-Watson CONTENTS List of maps vi List of tables vii Preface to the Second Edition viii Preface x A guide to pronunciation xiii INTRODUCTION: WHAT’S IN A NAME? 1 1 THE MEDIEVAL HERITAGE 17 2 THE CHALLENGE OF THE MODERN AGE 44 3 THE SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY CRISIS 70 4 ENLIGHTENED ABSOLUTISM OR ENLIGHTENED LIBERTY? 95 5 THE AGE OF LIBERAL NATIONALISM 122 6 FROM COMPROMISE TO INDEPENDENCE 150 7 THE DIFFICULT INDEPENDENCE 181 8 THE HARD ROAD TO FREEDOM 213 Notes 248 Chronological tables 251 Bibliography 273 Index 289 MAPS 1 East Central Europe in the late fifteenth century 11 2 East Central Europe, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech–Liechtenstein Relations Past and Present
    1 Peter Geiger – Tomáš Knoz – Eliška Fučíková – Ondřej Horák – Catherine Horel – Johann Kräftner – Thomas Winkelbauer – Jan Županič CZECH–LIECHTENSTEIN RELATIONS PAST AND PRESENT A summary report by the Czech-Liechtenstein Commission of Historians Brno 2014 2 CONTENTS A Word of Introduction Foreword I. Introduction a. The Czech-Liechtenstein Commission of Historians and its activities 2010–2013 b. Sources, literature, research, methodology II. The Liechtensteins in times of change a. The Middle Ages and the Early Modern Age b. The 19th Century c. The 20th Century III. Main issues a. Sites of memory and constructing a historical image of the Liechtensteins b. The Liechtensteins and art c. Land reform and confiscation IV. Conclusions a. Summary b. Outstanding areas and other possible steps V. Prospects VI. A selection from the sources and bibliography a. Archival sources b. Source editions c. Bibliography VII. Workshops and publications by the Commission of Historians a. Workshops b. Publications by the Czech-Liechtenstein Commission of Historians Summary Zusammenfassung Index 3 A Word of Introduction This joint summary report by the Czech-Liechtenstein Commission of Historians represents an important milestone in the relations between both of our countries. On the one hand, the Commission of Historians examined the joint history of Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia, as well as the House of Liechtenstein, while on the other, they looked at the relations between both our countries in the 20th century. The commission's findings have contributed greatly towards better mutual understanding and have created a valuable basis for the continued cooperation between the two countries. The depth and thoroughness of this three-year work by the Commission of Historians is impressive, and this extensive publication sheds light on the remarkable and still visible mark that the House of Liechtenstein left behind on Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia.
    [Show full text]