War of the Austrian Succession.Docx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

War of the Austrian Succession.Docx War of the Austrian Succession The War of the Austrian Succession was a conflict that took place from 16 December 1740 to 18 October 1748 between the various European powers of the time. The conflict was not restricted to Europe, but also spilled into their colonial holdings in Asia. The war established Prussia as a regional hegemon for years to come, altering the very balance of power in Europe. In India, the rivalry between Britain and France in the Austrian War of Succession resulted in the First Carnatic War. This article will give further details about the War of the Austrian Succession within the context of the UPSC Exams. What was the reason behind the War of the Austrian Succession? The pretext for the war came when a succession crisis happened upon the death of the Habsburg Emperor Charles VI in 1740. To understand how this crisis happened, one must keep in mind the following events: ● In 1703, a Mutual Pact of Succession was agreed upon. It stated that should the male line of the Habsburgs become extinct, the female line would take precedence. ● In this case, the female line referred to the heirs of the elder brother of Charles VI, Emperor Joseph I. ● But the Salic law excluded women of the royal family from inheriting the throne. But if the various Habsburk territories and the Imperial Diet granted approval, then exceptions would be made. ● Emperor Joseph's death in 1711 left two potential female heirs, Maria Josepha and Maria Amalia. But in April 1713, the Pragmatic Sanction was issued by Charles, which allowed female inheritance by the progeny of Charles VI. ● This sanction effectively ignored the 1703 agreement and created a potential for conflict because it placed the children of Charles VI ahead of his nieces. The birth of his daughter Maria Theresa in 1717 ensured that conflict was on the horizon. *Fact About Holy Roman Empire: Founded in 800 AD, the ‘Holy Roman Empire’ was a misleading name for Europe's largest collective of kingdoms and fiefdoms. It was not ‘Holy’ as it had disputes with the Pope in Rome from time to time. In those times, such acts of intransigence were looked down upon by other European kingdoms. It was not ‘Roman’ as it was Byzantine Empire that continued the legacy of the Romans. At its core, the Holy Roman Empire was Germanic. It was not an Empire, as it consisted of a collection of kingdoms and fiefdoms. Charles required his nieces to renounce their claim to the imperial throne in favour of their cousin Maria Theresa in 1719 by marrying Frederick Augustus of Saxony and Charles Albert of Bavaria. He believed that it would secure his daughters’ position, as Saxony and Bavaria - bitter rivals themselves - could not tolerate either gaining control of the Habsburg inheritance. Instead, he provided a legitimate claim on Habsburg territories. A family issue became a European one due to tensions within the Holy Roman Empire, caused by dramatic increases in the size and power of Bavaria, Prussia, and Saxony, mirrored by the post-1683 expansion of Habsburg power into lands previously held by the Ottoman Empire. Since theoretically, the Holy Roman Emperor has always been a Habsburg since 1437, Bavaria and Saxony could both lay a claim on the throne. Soon other European powers like France began backing the claims of Charles Albert of Bavaria despite it accepting the Pragmatic Sanction in 1735 Compounded by the failure to prepare Maria Theresa for her new role, many European statesmen were sceptical Austria could survive the contest that would follow Charles' death, which finally occurred in October 1740. In a matter of months, Europe was on a collision course for a prolonged War. Course of the Austrian War of Succession The war began on December 16, 1740, when Frederick II of Prussia invaded Silesia, one of the richest Habsburg provinces. His army defeated the Austrians at Mollwitz in April 1741 and overran Silesia. His victory enhanced the suspicion in Europe that the Habsburg dominions were incapable of defending themselves, and thus ensured that the war would become general. Within a month, France's Charles-Louis-Auguste Fouquet, comte (later marshal and duc) de Belle-Isle, constructed an alliance with Bavaria and Spain and, later, with Saxony and Prussia against Austria. Maria Theresa derived her main foreign support from the British Empire, which feared that, if the French achieved hegemony in Europe, the British commercial and colonial empire would be untenable. Thus, the War of the Austrian Succession was, in part, one phase of the struggle between France and Britain that lasted from 1689 to 1815. As a consequence, the British would clash against their French counterparts in India during the Battle of Madras in 1746. It would end in a French victory. The invasion of Austria and Bohemia by the French and Bavarian forces fell apart for lack of unity of purpose and military capability. Austria temporarily neutralized Prussia by allowing it to retain Silesia in July 1742, drove the French and Bavarians out of Bohemia (1742), and overran Bavaria. Austria’s allies—the British, Hanoverians, and Hessians—defeated the French at the Battle of Dettingen (June 27, 1743) in Bavaria. This Second Silesian War was concluded by the Treaty of Dresden in December 1745. It confirmed Prussian possession of Silesia. The last major French success was Marshal Maurice de Saxe’s conquest of the Austrian Netherlands (1745–46), which followed his great victory at the Battle of Fontenoy on May 11, 1745. From 1746 to 1748 the war dragged on indecisively. The British had withdrawn their army to England to oppose the French-supported efforts of the young pretender, Charles Edward, to win the thrones of Scotland and England for the Stuarts. The financial burden finally pushed the powers to the conference table. End of the War of the Austrian Succession The war ended with the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (1748) by which Maria Theresa was confirmed as Archduchess of Austria and Queen of Hungary. The treaty reflected that stalemate since most of the commercial issues that had led to the war were left unresolved, and many of the signatories were unhappy with the terms. Although the war had nearly bankrupted the state, Louis XV of France withdrew from the Low Countries for minimal benefit, to the dismay of France's nobility and populace. The Spanish considered their gains in Italy inadequate since they had failed to recover Menorca or Gibraltar and viewed the reassertion of British commercial rights in the Americas as an insult. Although Maria Theresa was acknowledged as her father's heir, she did not consider that a concession and deeply resented Britain's role in forcing her to cede Silesia to Prussia. For British statesmen, the war demonstrated the vulnerability of George II's German possession of Hanover to Prussia, and many politicians considered they had received little benefit from the enormous subsidies paid to Austria. The result was the realignment known as the Diplomatic Revolution in which Austria aligned itself with France, which marked the end of their centuries-old enmity, and Prussia became an ally of Britain. The new alliances would fight the 1756 to 1763 Seven Years' War..
Recommended publications
  • Carnatic Wars - Second Carnatic War [Modern Indian History Notes UPSC]
    UPSC Civil Services Examination UPSC Notes [GS-I] Topic: Carnatic Wars - Second Carnatic War [Modern Indian History Notes UPSC] NCERT notes on important topics for the UPSC Civil Services Exam. These notes will also be useful for other competitive exams like Bank PO, SSC, state civil services exams and so on. This article talks about The First Second War. Facts about the Second Carnatic War Fought between: Different claimants to the posts of the Nizam of Hyderabad, and the Nawab of the Carnatic; each claimant being supported either by the British or the French. People involved: Muhammad Ali and Chanda Sahib (for the Nawabship of the Carnatic or Arcot); Muzaffar Jung and Nasir Jung (for the post of the Nizam of Hyderabad). When: 1749 – 1754 Where: Carnatic (Southern India) Result: Muzaffar Jung became Hyderabad’s Nizam. Muhammad Ali became the Nawab of the Carnatic. Course of the Second Carnatic War The first Carnatic War demonstrated the power of the well-trained European army vis-à-vis the less than efficient armies of the Indian princes. The French Governor-General Dupleix wanted to take advantage of this, and assert influence and authority over the Indian kingdoms, so as to make way for a French Empire in India. So, he was looking to interfere in the internal power struggles among Indian chiefs. Even though England and France were officially at peace with each other as there was no fighting in Europe, the political climate in Southern Indian at that time led their companies to fight in the subcontinent. The Nizam of Hyderabad, Asaf Jah I died in 1748 starting a power struggle between his grandson (through his daughter) Muzaffar Jung, and his son Nasir Jung.
    [Show full text]
  • 254 Double Treaties Ended the Seven Years'
    #254 Double Treaties ended the Seven Years’ War – The Seven Years’ War was a continuation of the War of the Austrian Succession We have learned fully of the French and Indian War / Seven Years’ War double. Now we are going to add yet another double having to do with the Seven Years’ War. The Seven Years’ War is considered to be the second of two wars that go together in history, (1) the War of the Austrian Succession and (2) the Seven Years’ War. They are entirely connected. In Unsealing #208 The Ten Horns of Daniel 7:7 – The Cause of the Seven Years’ War, you might recall that a cause of the Seven Years’ War was that the ruler of Austria, Maria Theresa, desired to recover lost territory from Prussia. Prussia had seized northern Silesia from Austria in 1742, in the War of the Austrian Succession. Key Understanding: The Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) is considered by historians to be a continuation of the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-1748). They are double wars. In the War of the Austrian Succession (1740- 1748), Prussia seized northern Silesia from Austria. A major cause of the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) was Austria desiring to get Silesia back. The wars for Silesia were a major part of the larger wars, the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-1748) and the Seven Years’ Russia War (1756-1763). Germany Austria took over Silesia in 1526, but in 1742, Silesia Prussia seized northern Silesia from Austria in the First Silesian War (1740-1742), which was a part of the larger War of the Austrian Succession.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.Long.T65
    Cambridge University Press 0521853591 - The Cambridge History of Warfare Edited by Geoffrey Parker Index More information Index Abrams, Creighton (American general, aircraft carriers, 251; American (1930s), Vietnam War), 381 320; American (World War II), 356; Actium, battle of (31 BC), 427 Japanese (World War II), 355 Adrianople; battle of (AD 378), 63; Aisne offensive (1918), 283, 305 most fought-over town in history, Aix-la-Chapelle, treaty of (1748), 183, 427 184 Aelian (Tactics), 4, 157, 417, 431 Alans, 64 Aemilius Paulus (Roman general), 40 Alba, duke of, 5, 152, 155 Aeschylus on the Persian wars, 23, 25 Alberich (German withdrawal, 1917), Aetius (Roman general), 62, 63 298 Afghanistan’s democratic election. See Alberti, Leon Battista, on angled also al-Qaeda; Laden, Osama Bin, defences, 106 407 Alexander the Great, 3, 71, 98, 418 Agesilaus (Spartan general), 26, 37 Alexius (east Roman emperor), 79 aggression in the western military Alfonso X of Castile (Siete Partidas), 99 tradition, 6, 10, 414, 416, 418, Alfred the Great, 72, 76 425 Algerian War (1954–62), 372–374 Agincourt, battle of (1415), 88, 89 Algonkians, 139 agrarian warfare, 25, 30; Bronze-Age, Aljubarrota, battle of (1385), 85 18; hoplite, 18, 19, 21, 22; Roman Allerheim, battle of (1645), 160 militias, 49 Alma, battle of (1854), 222 air attacks; Gulf War, 392; Six Day War, Almagro, Diego de (Spanish 386; Vietnam War, 377–378, 380, conquistador), 139, 140 381; World War I, 309; World War al-Qaeda, 412. See also Laden, Osama II, 334, 351, 354, 357, 364; Yom Bin, 403; America strikes back, Kippur War, 387 406–412; America under attack, Air Corps Tactical School (USA), 319 403–406; Madrid explosion, 411 air defence,319, 387, 392; British Alvarez de Toledo, Don Fernando.
    [Show full text]
  • CC-12:HISTORY of INDIA(1750S-1857) II.EXPANSION and CONSOLIDATION of COLONIAL POWER
    CC-12:HISTORY OF INDIA(1750s-1857) II.EXPANSION AND CONSOLIDATION OF COLONIAL POWER: (A) MERCANTILISM,FOREIGN TRADE AND EARLY FORMS OF EXTRACTION FROM BENGAL The coming of the Europeans to the Indian subcontinent was an event of great significance as it ultimately led to revolutionary changes in its destiny in the future. Europe’s interest in India goes back to the ancient times when lucrative trade was carried on between India and Europe. India was rich in terms of spices, textile and other oriental products which had huge demand in the large consumer markets in the west. Since the ancient time till the medieval period, spices formed an important part of European trade with India. Pepper, ginger, chillies, cinnamon and cloves were carried to Europe where they fetched high prices. Indian silk, fine Muslin and Indian cotton too were much in demand among rich European families. Pearls and other precious stone also found high demand among the European elites. Trade was conducted both by sea and by land. While the sea routes opened from the ports of the western coast of India and went westward through the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea to Alexandria and Constantinople, Indian trade goods found their way across the Mediterranean to the commercials hubs of Venice and Genoa, from where they were then dispersed throughout the main cities of Europe. The old trading routes between the east and the west came under Turkish control after the Ottoman conquest of Asia Minor and the capture of Constantinople in1453.The merchants of Venice and Genoa monopolised the trade between Europe and Asia and refused to let the new nation states of Western Europe, particularly Spain and Portugal, have any share in the trade through these old routes.
    [Show full text]
  • I: COMING of the EUROPEANS Dr. A. Ravisankar, Ph.D., Portuguese, Dutch, Danes, British, &French Portuguese: (Headquarters Goa)
    I: COMING OF THE EUROPEANS Dr. A. Ravisankar, Ph.D., Portuguese, Dutch, Danes, British, &French Portuguese: (Headquarters Goa) • In 21st May,1498- Vasco da Cama landed in Calicut, with the patronage of King Emmanuel (Portugal)- cordially received by King Zamorin- opposed by the Arabs. • 1510 Goa was captured by Albuquerque- he was died and buried at Goa in 1515. Important Portuguese to visit India 1. Vasco da Cama-1498 2. Alvarez Cabral- 1500 3. Lopo Soares- 1503 4. Francisco de Almedia 1505 5. Albuquerque 1509 6. Nuno da Cunha- 1529-1538 7. Joa de Castro-1545- 1548 Important Portuguese Writers 1. Duarle Barbosa 2. Gasper Correa 3. Diago do Couto 4. Bros de Albuquerque 5. Dom Joao de Castro 6. Garcia de Orta. Causes for the failure • Weak successors • Corrupt administration • Naval Supremacy of British • Rise of other European trading powers • Discovery of Brazil- less attention towards Indian Territory. Important Works 1. Cultivation of Tobacco & Potato 2. 1st Printing Press (1556) 3. 1st Scientific work on Indian Medicinal plants. The Dutch (Headquarters Pulicat & Nagapatnam) • They all from Netherland • 1stPermanent Factory at Maulipatnam (1605) Dutch Factories in the Coromandel Coast: 1. Masulipatnam 2. Pettapoli 3. Devenampatnam 4. Tirupapuliyar 5. Pulicat 6. Nagapatnam 7. Porto Novo 8. Sadraspatanam 9. Golcunda 10. Nagal Wanche 11. Palakollu 12. Drakshram 13. Bimplipatnam Dutch Factories in Bengal 1. Pipli 2. Chinsura 3. Qasim Bazar 4. Patna Reason for Decline • Rise of English power • The authority was highly centralized • Officers of the Company became corrupt • Majority of the settlement was given to English. The French (Head Quarters Pondichery) • 1st French factory was established at Surat by Francois Caron • Pondichery was obtained from Sher Khan Lodi (Governor of Valikondapuram) by Francois Martin.
    [Show full text]
  • HOHENFRIEDEBERG, JUNE 4Th 1745
    HOHENFRIEDEBERG, JUNE 4th 1745 RULES hexes of a unit are its zone of control. Flipped units do not have a zone of control. Units have to stop as soon as they enter an Setup enemy zone of control. Units may not move from one zone of Place alternately one unit of a side beginning with the Austrians/Saxons; Prussian control hex to another in one turn. units (white) in hexes with grey circles, Austrian units (yellow) in hexes with Attack: The target must be within the attacker’s range in hexes. Other units yellow circles and Saxons (black/yellow) in hexes with black circles. block line of sight. If a unit is in an enemy zone of control, it may Counters only attack units in whose zone of control it is. Roll one six-sided die Values on the counters are: and add the attacker’s combat value. If two units attack the same combat - bb range target on the same turn, their two combat values may be added to movement d defence one single die roll. If the total is equal or greater than the target’s Terrain defence value, the target is flipped over and, if possible, it has to thick black border: may not be crossed retreat one hex (choice of defender) away from the attacker/s but thick grey border: stop movement after crossing; no attack after crossing not into an enemy zone of control. If the target was flipped already, grey centre dot: add 2 to unit’s defence; unit does not have to retreat (but it it is eliminated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the British Army in the Closing Stages of the Seven Years War in Western Europe As Studied Through the Battle of Vellinghausen
    1 Battle of Vellinghausen: Lessons Learnt? A Study of the British army in the closing stages of the Seven Years War in Western Europe as studied through the Battle of Vellinghausen Samuel James Dodson Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Masters by Research in History University of Leeds Department of History September 2019 2 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement The right of Samuel James Dodson to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Samuel James Dodson in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 3 Abstract This is a study of the British military actions in Western Germany during the Seven Years War, investigating the army’s ability in combat and analysing its improvements through the case study of the Battle of Vellinghausen. This will provide a more concentrated scope of the conflict centred on the Western theatre, rather than the general study upon the British army in America or the academic’s attraction with the Battle of Minden. With this in mind the research will be significant as it will open up discussions on how the British army fought in the European style during the mid-eighteenth century, as well as aiming to explore whether the British army learnt from its lessons early in the war to become an efficient fighting machine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corporate Evolution of the British East India Company, 1763-1813
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 Imperial Venture: The Evolution of the British East India Company, 1763-1813 Matthew Williams Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IMPERIAL VENTURE: THE EVOLUTION OF THE BRITISH EAST INDIA COMPANY, 1763-1813 By MATTHEW WILLIAMS A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2011 Matthew Richard Williams defended this thesis on October 11, 2011. The members of the supervisory committee were: Rafe Blaufarb Professor Directing Thesis Jonathan Grant Committee Member James P. Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the thesis has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii For Rebecca iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my major professor, Dr. Rafe Blaufarb for his enthusiasm and guidance on this thesis, as well as agreeing to this topic. I must also thank Dr. Charles Cox, who first stoked my appreciation for history. I also thank Professors Jonathan Grant and James Jones for agreeing to participate on my committee. I would be remiss if I forgot to mention and thank Professors Neil Jumonville, Ron Doel, Darrin McMahon, and Will Hanley for their boundless encouragement, enthusiasm, and stimulating conversation. All of these professors taught me the craft of history. I have had many classes with each of these professors and enjoyed them all.
    [Show full text]
  • “[America] May Be Conquered with More Ease Than Governed”: the Evolution of British Occupation Policy During the American Revolution
    “[AMERICA] MAY BE CONQUERED WITH MORE EASE THAN GOVERNED”: THE EVOLUTION OF BRITISH OCCUPATION POLICY DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION John D. Roche A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Wayne E. Lee Kathleen DuVal Joseph T. Glatthaar Richard H. Kohn Jay M. Smith ©2015 John D. Roche ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT John D. Roche: “[America] may be conquered with more Ease than governed”: The Evolution of British Occupation Policy during the American Revolution (Under the Direction of Wayne E. Lee) The Military Enlightenment had a profound influence upon the British army’s strategic culture regarding military occupation policy. The pan-European military treatises most popular with British officers during the eighteenth century encouraged them to use a carrot-and-stick approach when governing conquered or rebellious populations. To implement this policy European armies created the position of commandant. The treatises also transmitted a spectrum of violence to the British officers for understanding civil discord. The spectrum ran from simple riot, to insurrection, followed by rebellion, and culminated in civil war. Out of legal concerns and their own notions of honor, British officers refused to employ military force on their own initiative against British subjects until the mob crossed the threshold into open rebellion. However, once the people rebelled the British army sought decisive battle, unhindered by legal interference, to rapidly crush the rebellion. The British army’s bifurcated strategic culture for suppressing civil violence, coupled with its practical experiences from the Jacobite Rebellion of 1715 to the Regulator Movement in 1771, inculcated an overwhelming preference for martial law during military campaigns.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Science (History-Civics-Geography)
    SOCIAL SCIENCE (HISTORY-CIVICS-GEOGRAPHY) STANDARD X A Publication under Government of Tamilnadu Distribution of Free Text Book Programme (NOT FOR SALE) Untouchability is a Sin Untouchability is a Crime Untouchability is Inhuman TAMILNADU TEXTBOOK CORPORATION College Road, Chennaii – 600 006. © Government of Tamilnadu First Edition - 2004 Reprint - 2006 CHAIRPERSONS HISTORY & CIVICS GEOGRAPHY Dr. C. Balakrishnan Dr. T. Vasantha Kumaran Professor of History Professor Institute of Distance Education Department of Geography University of Madras University of Madras Chennai – 600 005 Chennai – 600 005 REVIEWERS Dr. P. Saravanan Dr. J. Uma Reader, Dept. of History Professor Govt. Arts College Department of Geography Nandanam Bharathi Women’s Govt. College Chennai- 600 035 Chennai- 600 108 AUTHORS History Tmt. S. Vasantha Mr. N. Subramanian B.T. Assistant (Retd.) Lecturer Lady M.Ct.M.Girls' Hr.Sec.School DIET Purasawalkam Namakkal Chennai- 600 084 637 001 Thiru R. Ravindranathan Ms. A. Dhanapackiam Head Master (Retd.) Professor Govt. High School Department of Geography Alavakkottai Bharathi Women’s Govt. College Sivaganga District Chennai- 600 108 Civics Dr. R. Mathaiyan Lecturer in Politics & Public Administration Institute of Distance Education University of Madras Chennai - 600 005 This book has been prepared by The Directorate of School Education on behalf of the Government of Tamil Nadu. This book has been printed on 60 G.S.M.Paper CONTENTS HISTORY Time Line ... V-VI UNIT - I 1. The Advent of the Europeans ... 1 2. Establishment and Expansion of British Power in India ... 13 3. The First War of Indian Independence (The Great Revolt of 1857) – End of East India Company’s Rule ..
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Political Portraits
    13 28 [COLLINS & GRIFFITH] A rare poster of Arthur Griffith, Michael Collins, Sean MacEoin (The Blacksmith of Ballinalee), Richard Mulcahy and President De Valera. The medallion portraits within a Celtic decorated border and the landscape portrait of De Valera is against a draped tricolour and sunburst. Framed. 30.5 x 30.5cm. In August 1921, de Valera secured Dáil Éireann approval to change the 1919 Dáil Con- stitution to upgrade his office from prime minister or chairman of the cabinet to a full President of the Republic. Declaring himself now the Irish equivalent of King George V, he argued that as Irish head of state, in the absence of the British head of state from the negotiations, he too should not attend the Treaty Negotiations at which British and Irish government leaders agreed to the effective independence of twenty-six of Ireland’s thirty-two counties as the Irish Free State, with Northern Ireland choosing to remain under British sovereignty. It is generally agreed by historians that whatever his motives, it was a mistake for de Valera not to have travelled to London. Lot 31 A rare and interesting item. Lot 29 €250 - 350 29 [IRISH BRIGADE] Victorious Charge of the Irish Brigade 11th May, 1745. 30 [IRISH PATRIOTS] The United Irish Patriots 1798. French Commander: Marshall Morris - English Commander: Duke of Cumberland. A coloured lithograph showing the ‘patriots of 1798’ seated and standing with in a col- Coloured lithograph. Framed. 70.0 x 35.0cm. Chicago: Kurz & Allison Art Publishers. onnaded assembly room. Framed. 66 x 52cm. Some surface scratches.
    [Show full text]
  • I: ADVENT of EUROPEANS Dr. A. Ravisankar, Ph.D., Portuguese, Dutch, Danes, British, &French Portuguese: (Headquarters Goa)
    I: ADVENT OF EUROPEANS Dr. A. Ravisankar, Ph.D., Portuguese, Dutch, Danes, British, &French Portuguese: (Headquarters Goa) • In 21st May,1498- Vasco da Cama landed in Calicut, with the patronage of King Emmanuel (Portugal)- cordially received by King Zamorin- opposed by the Arabs. • 1510 Goa was captured by Albuquerque- he was died and buried at Goa in 1515. Important Portuguese to visit India 1. Vasco da Cama-1498 2. Alvarez Cabral- 1500 3. Lopo Soares- 1503 4. Francisco de Almedia 1505 5. Albuquerque 1509 6. Nuno da Cunha- 1529-1538 7. Joa de Castro-1545- 1548 Important Portuguese Writers 1. Duarle Barbosa 2. Gasper Correa 3. Diago do Couto 4. Bros de Albuquerque 5. Dom Joao de Castro 6. Garcia de Orta. Causes for the failure • Weak successors • Corrupt administration • Naval Supremacy of British • Rise of other European trading powers • Discovery of Brazil- less attention towards Indian Territory. Important Works 1. Cultivation of Tobacco & Potato 2. 1st Printing Press (1556) 3. 1st Scientific work on Indian Medicinal plants. The Dutch (Headquarters Pulicat & Nagapatnam) • They all from Netherland • 1stPermanent Factory at Maulipatnam (1605) Dutch Factories in the Coromandel Coast: 1. Masulipatnam 2. Pettapoli 3. Devenampatnam 4. Tirupapuliyar 5. Pulicat 6. Nagapatnam 7. Porto Novo 8. Sadraspatanam 9. Golcunda 10. Nagal Wanche 11. Palakollu 12. Drakshram 13. Bimplipatnam Dutch Factories in Bengal 1. Pipli 2. Chinsura 3. Qasim Bazar 4. Patna Reason for Decline • Rise of English power • The authority was highly centralized • Officers of the Company became corrupt • Majority of the settlement was given to English. The French (Head Quarters Pondichery) • 1st French factory was established at Surat by Francois Caron • Pondichery was obtained from Sher Khan Lodi (Governor of Valikondapuram) by Francois Martin.
    [Show full text]