DOCSLIB.ORG

FOR the COASTAL PLAIN of NORTH CAROLINA ~--E Roy"- Tj Y"",Cf'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE COASTAL PLAIN OF NORTH CAROLINA ~--e roY"- tJ y"",cf' Edited By Gerald R. Baum T:~-- w. Burleigh Harris ) And !~- Victor A. Zullo ;' -j Carolina Geological Society Field Trip Guidebook And October 19-21, 1979 Atlantic Coastal Plain Geological Association Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina Cover illustration: Major structural features of the North Carolina Coastal Plain. (Figure 1 from Harris, Zullo and Baum) Layout by Anne Virant-Lazar and Ben McKenzie Copies of this guidebook can be purchased fram: Geological Survey Section Department of Natural Resources and Community Development P. O. Box 27687 Raleigh, NC 27611 Ii CAROLI NA GEOLOGI CAL SOC IETY AND ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN GEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION October 19-21, 1979 STRUCTURAL AND STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK FOR THE COASTAL PLAIN OF NORTH CAROLINA Edited by Gerald R. Baum Department of Geology College of Charleston Charleston, South Carolina 29401 W. Burleigh Harris and Victor A. Zullo Department of Earth Sciences University of North Carolina, Wilmington Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Carolina Geological Society 1979 Officers President: Arthur W. Snoke Department of Geology University of South Carolina Columbia, South Carolina Vice-President: Robert E. Lemmon Department of Geography and Earth Sciences University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte, North Carolina Secretary-Treasurer: S. Duncan Heron, Jr. Department of Geology Duke University Durham, North Carolina Membership Chairman: Paul Nystrom South Carolina Geological Survey Columbia, South Carolina Atlantic Coastal Plain Geological Association 1979 Officers Secretary-Treasurer: Tom Pickett Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware Newark, Delaware Field Trip Leaders: Gerald R. Baum Department of Geology College of Charleston Charleston, South Carolina W. Burleigh Harris and Victor A. Zullo Department of Earth Sciences University of North Carolina at Wilmington Wilmington, North Carolina Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. A. Einstein CONTENTS page PREFACE •••••.••..•.••.•.•.••.••••••••..••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••..••••.••••.•.•••• vi1 HISTORICAL REVIEW OF EOCENE TO EARLY MIOCENE STRATIGRAPHY, NORTH CAROLINA Gerald R. Baum, W. Burleigh Harris and Victor A. Zullo ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 TECTONIC EFFECTS ON CRETACEOUS, PALEOGENE, AND EARLY NEOGENE SEDIMENTATION, NORTH CAROLINA W. Burleigh Harris, Victor A. Zullo and Gerald R. Baum ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 17 PLIO-PLEISTOCENE CRUSTAL WARPING IN THE OUTER COASTAL PLAIN OF NORTH CAROLINA Victor A. Zullo and W. Burleigh Harris ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 31 SOME STRATIGRAPHIC PROBLEMS OF THE PLEISTOCENE STRATA IN THE AREA FROM NEUSE RIVER ESTUARY TO HOFMANN FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA Walter H. Wheeler, Raymond B. Daniels and Erling E. Gamble ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 41 ORIGIN OF AN OUTLIER OF THE EOCENE CASTLE HAYNE LIMESTONE IN DUPLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Lee J. 0 t te ....•.•..•.......•..•....•...•.•..•.•........•..•.•.•.•.........•......... 51 SPONGE-BEARING HARDGROUNDS IN THE CASTLE HAYNE LIMESTONE Michael L. Upchurch 59 CALCAREOUS NANNOFOSSILS FROM THE LOWER TERTIARY OF NORTH CAROLINA Thomas R. Worsley and Kevin P. Turco ••....•...•.•....•..•...••.•••.•.•........•..•... 65 BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF EOCENE THROUGH MIOCENE CIRRIPEDIA, NORTH CAROLINA COASTAL PLAIN Victor A. Zullo ...........................................•.......................... 73 TECTONIC HISTORY AND CORRELATION OF THE EOCENE STRATA OF THE CAROLINAS: PRELIMINARY REPORT Gerald R. Baum, Joan S. Collins, Richard M. Jones, Barbara A. Mad1inger and Richard J. Powell ..................................•...•................•............. 87 FIELD TRIP MAP ......................................................................... 96 FIELD TRIP LOG Gerald R. Baum, W. Burleigh Harris and Victor A. Zullo ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 97 v The North Carolina Geological Survey has for many years published the guidebook for the Carolina Geological Society's Annual Field Trip. This is done as a service to that group of professionals who contribute so much to the public's knowledge of North Carolina's geology and mineral resources and so that the itinerary of these very interesting trips can be duplicated by other citizens of the state and also visitors to North Carolina. This year's guidebook is somewhat unique as it contains a collection of previously unpublished papers on the stratigraphy of North Carolina's Coastal Plain province and each paper has a fairly comprehensive bibliography of additional published infor­ mation on the same subject. Even a casual reading of all these reports will lead the reader to the conclusion that there is some lack of consensus among the experts on the proper subdivision and classification of the Tertiary section found in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Also, there is considerable detailed work under­ way or planned for the immediate future in this area which has not been published upon but which will undoubtedly make substantial contributions to a resolution of the problems. Therefore, the North Carolina Geological Survey takes no official position at this time with respect to the accuracy of the opinions and conclusions contained in this guidebook and the reader should understand that survey publication here is for the primary purpose of making the rest of the geologic community aware of the ongoing work. PREFACE Many individuals have suggested that the Atlantic Coastal Plain has been affected by tectonism (e.g., Hobbs, 1904; Stephenson, 1923; Cedarstrom, 1945; LeGrand, 1955; Ferenczi, 1959; Doering, 1960), but few have considered tectonics relative to stratigraphic interpretation. Recognition of tectonically controlled depositional patterns is dependent upon an understanding of superpositional relationships and areal dis­ tr~bution of lithic units; a goal that has been hampered by lack of exposures, repetition of lithologies, and absence or poor preservation of diagnostic fossils. The increased availability of surface and sub­ surface data in the past two decades, coupled with advances in litho- and biostratigraphic methodology, have resulted in refinements and revisions of the stratigraphic framework. These changes, in turn, pro­ vide evidence of tectonic controls. Gibson (1969) and Brown et al. (1972) were the first to suggest a broad scale correlation between tectonism and sediment distribution in the Atlantic Coastal Plain. BrolYn ~ al. (1972) showed a relation­ ship between tectonism and sediment deposition for subsurface units in the North Carolina Coastal Plain. However~ the subsurface units were not correlated with previously recognized surface stratigraphy. We have attempted to relate the tectonic framework of Brown ~ al. (1972) to our interpretations of the exposed Tertiary sequence. and in so doing have detailed certain aspects of the framework. No geologic investigation is ever final; interpretations change. We are presenting a model that differs from those presented in the past and hope that this approach will be considered in future studies on the Atlantic Coastal Plain. We are indebted to many people: Eldon Allen and Edward Burt (North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Geological Survey Section); Warren Blow (U. S. National Museum); Philip M. Brown (U. S. Geological Survey); Laurel M. Bybell (U. S. Geological Survey); Joseph G. Carter (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill); G. Arthur Cooper (U. S. National Museum); Janice Cooper (University of North Carolina, Wilmington); Robert Edwards (Martin-Marietta Corporation); Paul D. Fullagar (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill); Lloyd N. Glawe (Northeast Louisiana University); S. Duncan Heron (Duke University); Roy L. Ingram (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill); Porter M. Kier(U. S. National Museum); F. Stearns MacNeil (U. S. Geological Survey); H. Weinburg Rasmussen (Geologisk Museum, Denmark); Daniel A. Textoris (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill). We are also indebted to the many quarry owners and operators who have provided unlimited access to their facilities. The following have provided funding for this research: College of Charleston, Faculty Research and Development Fund; Marine Sciences Council of the University of North Carolina; North Carolina Board of Science and Techn0logy; Program for Marine Sciences Research and the Faculty Research and Development Fund, the University of North Carolina, Wilmington; North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development; Sigma Xi; Smith Fund at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and the South Carolina Geological Survey. Sincere thanks are extended to Sandra Cromwell, College of Charleston and Cathy Morris, UNC-W, for typing, editing, and general preparation of the guidebook. Gerald R. Baum W. Burleigh Harris Victor A. Zullo vii II HISTORICAL REVIEW OF EOCENE TO EARLY MIOCENE STRATIGRAPHY 1 NORTH CAROLI NA Gerald R. Baum Department of Geology College of Charleston Charleston, South Carolina 29401 W. Burleigh Harris and Victor A. Zullo Department of Earth Sciences University of North Carolina, Wilmington Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 r'------,.------,-:·:-:r,.::-.""':".."7.",,~,..=-.::':'"iH:::;--'r-------,···----.. STRATIGRAPHY Mesozoic-Cenozoic Boundary Due to the confusion of Cretaceous and Eocene strata in the Wilmington-Castle Hayne area, the Mesozoic-Tertiary boundary eluded American geologists in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Stanton (1891)
Recommended publications
  • Download Guidebook As .Pdf

    Download Guidebook As .Pdf

    CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY FIELD TRIP GUIDEBOOK November 13 – 15, 1992 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE CENTRAL SAVANNAH RIVER AREA, SOUTH CAROLINA AND GEORGIA edited by Wallace Fallaw Department of Geology, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613 Van Price Environmental Monitoring section, Westinghouse Savannah River Co., Aiken SC 29808 Front cover: Topography of the Central Savannah River Valley and surrounding area looking up-river. Copies of this guidebook can be obtained from: South Carolina Geological Survey Harbison Forest Road Columbia, South Carolina 29210-4089 ii WE THANK THESE CORPORATE SPONSORS FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF THE 1992 CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY MEETING J.H. HUBER CORPORATION Langley, South Carolina KENNECOTT RIDGEWAY MINING COMPANY Ridgeway, South Carolina RMT, INC. Greenville, South Carolina SOUTHEASTERN CLAY COMPANY Aiken, South Carolina GERAGHTY AND MILLER INC. Aiken, South Carolina FOSTER DIXIANA CORP. Columbia, South Carolina EXPLORATION RESOURCES INC. Athens, Georgia The United States Department of Energy and the South Carolina Geological Survey provided partial support for this guidebook. However, the opinions and interpretations expressed within are not necessarily those of the Department of Energy or the South Carolina Geological Survey. iii CONTENTS Road Log and Outcrops in the vicinity of the Savannah River Site (W.C. Fallaw, Van Price and Walter J. Sex- ton) . .. .1 Observations on general allo-stratigraphy and tectonic framework of the southeastern Atlantic Coast Regional Cross Section (DNAG E-5 Corridor) Georgia and South Carolina as they relate to the Savan- nah River Site. (Donald Colquhoun). .. .11 Outline of stratigraphy at the Savannah River Site. (W. C. Fallaw and Van Price) . .17 Stratigraphic relationships in Eocene out crops along Upper Three Runs at the Savannah River Site.
  • Nautiloid Shell Morphology

    Nautiloid Shell Morphology

    MEMOIR 13 Nautiloid Shell Morphology By ROUSSEAU H. FLOWER STATEBUREAUOFMINESANDMINERALRESOURCES NEWMEXICOINSTITUTEOFMININGANDTECHNOLOGY CAMPUSSTATION SOCORRO, NEWMEXICO MEMOIR 13 Nautiloid Shell Morphology By ROUSSEAU H. FLOIVER 1964 STATEBUREAUOFMINESANDMINERALRESOURCES NEWMEXICOINSTITUTEOFMININGANDTECHNOLOGY CAMPUSSTATION SOCORRO, NEWMEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Alvin J. Thompson, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EXOFFICIO THEHONORABLEJACKM.CAMPBELL ................................ Governor of New Mexico LEONARDDELAY() ................................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTEDMEMBERS WILLIAM G. ABBOTT ................................ ................................ ............................... Hobbs EUGENE L. COULSON, M.D ................................................................. Socorro THOMASM.CRAMER ................................ ................................ ................... Carlsbad EVA M. LARRAZOLO (Mrs. Paul F.) ................................................. Albuquerque RICHARDM.ZIMMERLY ................................ ................................ ....... Socorro Published February 1 o, 1964 For Sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mex.—Price $2.50 Contents Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION
  • A Late Oligocene Or Earliest Miocene Molluscan Fauna from Sitkinak Island, Alaska

    A Late Oligocene Or Earliest Miocene Molluscan Fauna from Sitkinak Island, Alaska

    A Late Oligocene or Earliest Miocene Molluscan Fauna From Sitkinak Island, Alaska By RICHARD C. ALLISON and LOUIE MARINCOVICH, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1233 Describes the late Oligocene or earliest Miocene molluscan fauna from the Narrow Cape Formation on Sitkinak Island, noting the mixture of Asiatic, North American, and endemic high-latitude North Pacific taxa. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, &cretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Catal ogi ng in Pub1 ication Data A1 1i son, Richard C., 1935- A late Oligocene or earliest Miocene molluscan fauna from Sitki nak Is1and, A1 aska. ( Geological Survey Professional Paper ; 1233) Bibl iography: p. 9-10. Supt. of Doc. no.: I 19.16:1233 1. Moll usks, Fossil --A1 aska--Si tkinak I sl and. 2. Pal eontol ogy--01 igocene . 3. Pal eontol ogy--Mi ocene . I. Marincovich, Louie. 11. Title. 111. Series. QE801. A44 564' .09798' 4 81-607925 AACR2 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Introduction Faunal composition Age and correlation .................................................................................................................................. Relation to the type Narrow Cape Formation of Kodiak Island Paleoecology ................................................................................................................................................ Water depth Water temperature
  • The Bivalve Pholadomya Gigantea in the Early Cretaceous of Argentina: Taxonomy, Taphonomy and Paleogeographic Implications

    The Bivalve Pholadomya Gigantea in the Early Cretaceous of Argentina: Taxonomy, Taphonomy and Paleogeographic Implications

    The bivalve Pholadomya gigantea in the Early Cretaceous of Argentina: Taxonomy, taphonomy and paleogeographic implications Darío G. Lazo Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52 (2), 2007: 375-390 Pholadomya gigantea is a widely distributed Early Cretaceous bivalve mollusc. It has been recorded in the North Temperate, Tethyan, and South Temperate Realms. Based on recent field work and newly collected material from the Neuquén Basin, the taxonomy, mode of occurrence and palaeobiogeography of this species is reviewed. In the Agrio Formation (Valanginian-Barremian) P. gigantea is neither abundant nor dominant, but occurs throughout the unit. It was facies-dependent being restricted to well-oxygenated waters and soft to firm, sandy and bioclastic substrates of shoreface to inner shelf environments. The life habit of P. gigantea was similar to that of Recent Pholadomya candida , deep burrowing and sedentary, but it has not a pedal gape and accessory muscle scars related to valve closure. Thus a suspension-feeding habit, not a pedal-feeding system, may be inferred as is commonly suggested in other Jurassic and Cretaceous Pholadomya species. Pholadomya agrioensis is a valid taxon that is recorded in the Berriasian-Valanginian of Neuquén. It is similar in outline to P. gigantea and had probably the same basic palaeoecology, even though it has a blunt anterior margin, deep umbonal-ventral sulcus and distinct anterior ornamentation. Once in life position this species was capable of further digging in the sediment. This species probably burrowed in muddy substrates in the offshore zone. Pholadomya sanctaecrucis from the Valanginian of Europe and also recorded in Argentina is ornamented only with commarginal lines and should be removed to the genus Homomya.
  • Zwei Miocaene Arten Von Aturia (Nautilaceae)

    Zwei Miocaene Arten Von Aturia (Nautilaceae)

    Zwei miocaene Arten von Aturia (Nautilaceae) Autor(en): Jung, Peter Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae Band (Jahr): 59 (1966) Heft 1 PDF erstellt am: 29.09.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-163385 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Zwei miocaene Arten von Atavia (Nautilaceae) von Peter Jung (Basel)1) Mit 1 Textfigur und 2 Tafeln ABSTRACT .A neotype of Aturia aturi (Basterot) is designated and figured. Several Miocene species of Aturia from Northern South America, Japan and Australia are believed to be synonyms either of the European A. aturi or the Middle .American A.
  • Abelisaurus Comahuensis 321 Acanthodiscus Sp. 60, 64

    Abelisaurus Comahuensis 321 Acanthodiscus Sp. 60, 64

    Index Page numbers in italic denote figure. Page numbers in bold denote tables. Abelisaurus comahuensis 321 structure 45-50 Acanthodiscus sp. 60, 64 Andean Fold and Thrust Belt 37-53 Acantholissonia gerthi 61 tectonic evolution 50-53 aeolian facies tectonic framework 39 Huitrin Formation 145, 151-152, 157 Andes, Neuqu6n 2, 3, 5, 6 Troncoso Member 163-164, 167, 168 morphostructural units 38 aeolian systems, flooded 168, 169, 170, 172, stratigraphy 40 174-182 tectonic evolution, 15-32, 37-39, 51 Aeolosaurus 318 interaction with Neuqu6n Basin 29-30 Aetostreon 200, 305 Andes, topography 37 Afropollis 76 Andesaurus delgadoi 318, 320 Agrio Fold and Thrust Belt 3, 16, 18, 29, 30 andesite 21, 23, 26, 42, 44 development 41 anoxia see dysoxia-anoxia stratigraphy 39-40, 40, 42 Aphrodina 199 structure 39, 42-44, 47 Aphrodina quintucoensis 302 uplift Late Cretaceous 43-44 Aptea notialis 75 Agrio Formation Araucariacites australis 74, 75, 76 ammonite biostratigraphy 58, 61, 63, 65, 66, Araucarioxylon 95,273-276 67 arc morphostructural units 38 bedding cycles 232, 234-247 Arenicolites 193, 196 calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy 68, 71, Argentiniceras noduliferum 62 72 biozone 58, 61 highstand systems tract 154 Asteriacites 90, 91,270 lithofacies 295,296, 297, 298-302 Asterosoma 86 92 marine facies 142-143, 144, 153 Auca Mahuida volcano 25, 30 organic facies 251-263 Aucasaurus garridoi 321 palaeoecology 310, 311,312 Auquilco evaporites 42 palaeoenvironment 309- 310, 311, Avil6 Member 141,253, 298 312-313 ammonites 66 palynomorph biostratigraphy 74,
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project

    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project

    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
  • SI Appendix for Hopkins, Melanie J, and Smith, Andrew B

    SI Appendix for Hopkins, Melanie J, and Smith, Andrew B

    Hopkins and Smith, SI Appendix SI Appendix for Hopkins, Melanie J, and Smith, Andrew B. Dynamic evolutionary change in post-Paleozoic echinoids and the importance of scale when interpreting changes in rates of evolution. Corrections to character matrix Before running any analyses, we corrected a few errors in the published character matrix of Kroh and Smith (1). Specifically, we removed the three duplicate records of Oligopygus, Haimea, and Conoclypus, and removed characters C51 and C59, which had been excluded from the phylogenetic analysis but mistakenly remain in the matrix that was published in Appendix 2 of (1). We also excluded Anisocidaris, Paurocidaris, Pseudocidaris, Glyphopneustes, Enichaster, and Tiarechinus from the character matrix because these taxa were excluded from the strict consensus tree (1). This left 164 taxa and 303 characters for calculations of rates of evolution and for the principal coordinates analysis. Other tree scaling methods The most basic method for scaling a tree using first appearances of taxa is to make each internal node the age of its oldest descendent ("stand") (2), but this often results in many zero-length branches which are both theoretically questionable and in some cases methodologically problematic (3). Several methods exist for modifying zero-length branches. In the case of the results shown in Figure 1, we assigned a positive length to each zero-length branch by having it share time equally with a preceding, non-zero-length branch (“equal”) (4). However, we compared the results from this method of scaling to several other methods. First, we compared this with rates estimated from trees scaled such that zero-length branches share time proportionally to the amount of character change along the branches (“prop”) (5), a variation which gave almost identical results as the method used for the “equal” method (Fig.
  • (Approx) Mixed Micro Shells (22G Bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22G Bag Provides Hours of Fun; Some Interesting Foraminifera Also Included

    (Approx) Mixed Micro Shells (22G Bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22G Bag Provides Hours of Fun; Some Interesting Foraminifera Also Included

    Special Price £ US$ Family Genus, species Country Quality Size Remarks w/o Photo Date added Category characteristic (€) (approx) (approx) Mixed micro shells (22g bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22g bag provides hours of fun; some interesting Foraminifera also included. 17/06/21 Mixed micro shells Ischnochitonidae Callistochiton pulchrior Panama F+++ 89mm € 1,80 £1,55 $2,10 21/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Chaetopleura lurida Panama F+++ 2022mm € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Hairy girdles, beautifully preserved. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 30mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 27.9mm € 2,80 £2,42 $3,27 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Stenoplax limaciformis Panama F+++ 16mm+ € 6,50 £5,61 $7,60 Uncommon. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Philippines F+++ 25mm+ € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Hairy margins, beautifully preserved. 04/08/17 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Australia F+++ 25mm+ € 2,60 £2,25 $3,04 02/06/18 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 41mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 32mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 44mm+ € 5,00 £4,32 $5,85 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F++ 35mm € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 29mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Caribbean.
  • View, CMM-I-2126

    View, CMM-I-2126

    SYSTEMATICS AND PALEOECOLOGY OF MIOCENE PORTUNID AND CANCRID DECAPOD FOSSILS FROM THE ST. MARYS FORMATION, MARYLAND A thesis submitted To Kent State University in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Heedar Bahman August, 2018 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Thesis written by Heedar Bahman B.S., Kuwait University, 2011 M.S., Kent State University, 2018 Approved by Rodney M. Feldmann , Ph.D., Advisor Daniel Holm , Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geology James L. Blank , Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................... viii SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 GEOLOGICAL SETTING ..................................................................................................5 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................7
  • Late Cretaceous Nautilid Juveniles of Cymatoceras Reussi and Eutrephoceras Aff

    Late Cretaceous Nautilid Juveniles of Cymatoceras Reussi and Eutrephoceras Aff

    SBORNÍK NÁRODNÍHO MUZEA V PRAZE ACTA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Řada B – Přírodní vědy • sv. 70 • 2014 • čís. 3–4 • s. 143–152 Series B – Historia Naturalis • vol. 70 • 2014 • no. 3–4 • pp. 143–152 LATE CRETACEOUS NAUTILID JUVENILES OF CYMATOCERAS REUSSI AND EUTREPHOCERAS AFF. SUBLAEVIGATUM – SCARCE FOSSILS UNDER RISK OF PYRITE DEGRADATION JIŘÍ FRANK JAN SKLENÁŘ BORIS EKRT National Museum, Department of Palaeontology, Václavské náměstí 68, 115 74 Praha 1, the Czech Republic; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Frank, J., Sklenář, J. Ekrt, B. (2014): Late Cretaceous nautilid juveniles of Cymatoceras reussi and Eutrephoceras aff. sublaevigatum – scarce fossils under risk of pyrite degradation. – Acta Mus. Nat. Pragae, Ser. B, Hist. Nat., 70(3-4): 143–152, Praha. ISSN 1804-6479. Abstract. The syntype collection of “Nautilus reussi” has been subject to a detailed revision resulting in confirmation of at least provisional validity of the species represented by a single juvenile specimen. This species, restricted now to the Late Coniacian, is inserted into the genus Cymatoceras Hyatt, 1884. The rest of the collection differs from the original description and is left separately as Eutrephoceras aff. sublaevi- gatum, being considered juveniles of the species. The lithology, geographic and stratigraphic position of the type locality of Cymatoceras reussi (FRITSCH IN FRITSCH ET SCHLÖNBACH, 1872) as well as the other sites are discussed here. The valuable material is endangered due to pyrite degradation as relics of this unstable sulphide are still at present hidden in the secondary limonitic material. The degradation products cause volumetric expansion resulting in formation of crevices and loss of integrity.
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Eocene Rocks at Pulali Point, Jefferson County, Eastern Olympic Peninsula, Washington

    Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Eocene Rocks at Pulali Point, Jefferson County, Eastern Olympic Peninsula, Washington

    PALEONTOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF EOCENE ROCKS AT PULALI POINT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, EASTERN OLYMPIC PENINSULA, WASHINGTON by RICHARD L. SQUIRES, JAMES L. GOEDERT, and KEITH L. KALER WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS 31 1992 ., WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF Natural Resources Brian Boyle • Commhstoner of Public Lands An Steo_r0$ - Superv1sor Division ol Geology and Earth Resources Raymond Lcmnanls. State Geologlsl PALEONTOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY OF EOCENE ROCKS AT PULALI POINT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, EASTERN OLYMPIC PENINSULA, WASHINGTON by RICHARD L. SQUIRES, JAMES L. GOEDERT, AND KEITH L. KALER WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS 31 1992 W>.SHING'TON STAT1r OEPARTMDIT or Natural Resources 8ncll) Bov,. · COmmmioner ot Pu!xk: tancb M $i.atni; S\lp$1'WOJ' DtY!llcn 01 Gtology ahCS £artti ~ Raymond l.mlMn.:I ~Geologist Cover: From left, ?Falsifusus marysvillensis; Pachycrommium clarki; large bivalve, Veneri­ cardia hornii s.s.; Delectopecten cf. D. vancouverensis sanjuanensis; Turritella uvasana hendoni. These specimens are shown at 150 percent of the dimensions on Plates 1 and 3. Use of trade, product, or firm names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not consitute endorsement by the Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources. This report is available from: Publications Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources P.O. Box 47007 Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Price $ 1.85 Tax (Stale residenl.t only) .15 Total $ 2.00 Mail orders must be prepaid; please add $1.00 to each order for postage and handling. Make checks payable to the Department of Natural Resources.