DOCSLIB.ORG

Nautiloid Shell Morphology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nautiloid Shell Morphology MEMOIR 13 Nautiloid Shell Morphology By ROUSSEAU H. FLOWER STATEBUREAUOFMINESANDMINERALRESOURCES NEWMEXICOINSTITUTEOFMININGANDTECHNOLOGY CAMPUSSTATION SOCORRO, NEWMEXICO MEMOIR 13 Nautiloid Shell Morphology By ROUSSEAU H. FLOIVER 1964 STATEBUREAUOFMINESANDMINERALRESOURCES NEWMEXICOINSTITUTEOFMININGANDTECHNOLOGY CAMPUSSTATION SOCORRO, NEWMEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Alvin J. Thompson, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EXOFFICIO THEHONORABLEJACKM.CAMPBELL ................................ Governor of New Mexico LEONARDDELAY() ................................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTEDMEMBERS WILLIAM G. ABBOTT ................................ ................................ ............................... Hobbs EUGENE L. COULSON, M.D ................................................................. Socorro THOMASM.CRAMER ................................ ................................ ................... Carlsbad EVA M. LARRAZOLO (Mrs. Paul F.) ................................................. Albuquerque RICHARDM.ZIMMERLY ................................ ................................ ....... Socorro Published February 1 o, 1964 For Sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mex.—Price $2.50 Contents Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ I General purpose ....................................................................................................................................... I History ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Terminology ........................................................................................................................ 4 General shell organization ...............................................................................................................................4 A note on shell habit ................................................................................................................................ 5 CONCH ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 General features .........................................................................................................................................7 Shell form ...................................................................................................................................................7 Composition ...............................................................................................................................................9 Apertures ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Ornament ................................................................................................................................................. 10 Conch interior ........................................................................................................................................ 11 Protoconch ............................................................................................................................................... 12 SEPTA ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 General structure ....................................................................................................................... 14 Composition ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Regions of the septum ............................................................................................................................ 15 CONNECTING RING ......................................................................................................... 18 General structure ................................................................................................................ 18 Plectronoceratina ....................................................................................................................... 18 Ellesmeroceratina .............................................................................................................................. 20 Cyrtoceratina .................................................................................................................................... 21 Actinoceratida ......................................................................................................................................... 21 Endoceratida ............................................................................................................................................. 22 Tarphyceratida ........................................................................................................................ 23 The discosorid ring .................................................................................................................................. 23 Oncoceratida ............................................................................................................................................ 23 Thin, apparently homogeneous, rings ............................................................................................ 26 THE SIPHON OR SIPHUNCLE .............................................................................................. 27 SIPHONAL DEPOSITS ............................................................................................................. 29 General relationships ............................................................................................................ 29 Ellesmeroceratida ............................................................................................................................. 29 Discosorida, the fibralia .......................................................................................................................... 31 The endoceroid endosiphuncle ............................................................................................................. 32 Actinoceratida .......................................................................................................................................... 37 Michelinoceratida ............................................................................................................................. 38 Other orders ............................................................................................................................... 41 CAMERAL DEPOSITS .............................................................................................................. 42 ORIENTATION ........................................................................................................................................... 46 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................................... 48 Page SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ...................................................................................................... 54 Protocycloceras affine ........................................................................................................... 54 Diaphragms in the Endoceratida .......................................................................................................... 55 Dideroceras .............................................................................................................................................. 55 Dideroceras wahlenbergi ................................................................................................. 55 Dideroceras magnum .................................................................................................. 56 Dideroceras gracile ............................................................................................................... 56 Dideroceras holmi ..................................................................................................... 56 Dideroceras ventrale ............................................................................................................. 56 Bisonoceras .............................................................................................................................................. 56 Bisonoceras corniforme ............................................................................................................... 57 Bisonoceras spp. ............................................................................................................................... 58 Disphenoceras ......................................................................................................................................... 58 Disphenoceras conicum .............................................................................................. 58 Dartonoceras ...........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Invertebrate Paleontology Devonian Goniatites from Nevada
    N. Jb. Geol. Palaont. Abh. 122 3 337—342 Stuttgart. Juni 1965 Invertebrate Paleontology Earth Sciences Division Natural History Museum Devonian goniatites from Nevada By M. R. House University Museum, Oxford With plate 32 Abstract: Several goniatites recently found in the Nevada Limestone and Pilot Shale * Nevada are described. A new species, Erbenoceras erbeni, is erected for specimens from *< Lower Nevada Limestone in the Cortez Mountains and is thought to be of Emsian age. -im higher in the Nevada Limestone in the southern Roberts Mountains, but below the »3-known Siringocephahts-hezting level, occurs Cabrieroceras aff. crispiforme, which would -Tear to indicate a basal Givetian horizon. A poorly preserved lmitoceras is recorded ~tn the Pilot Shale in the Pahranagat Range. All these three genera are recorded from «Tada for the first time. Comments are made on the palaeogeographic significance of the Tjrrence of these distinctively European forms in the western United States. Introduction Through the kindness of Dr. J. G. JOHNSON of the University of Cali- nia at Los Angeles, several Devonian goniatite faunas have been sub- *rted for study and are reported on here. They include the first Middle Vvonian goniatites known from the western United States, and these serve * give a tentative placing of the Eifelian/Givetian boundary in the Nevada -nestone. Also there are two particularly interesting Lower Devonian rcimens which must be from near the level which has yielded the holotype ' Agoniatites nevadensis MILLER, which has recently been considered to be a '-cherticeras (HOUSE 1962, p. 262) and that which yielded Goniatites desidera- * WALCOTT which Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment for Development Improving Utilization of the Queen
    Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series December 2020 ◼ EfD DP 20-39 Improving Utilization of the Queen Conch (Aliger Gigas) Resource in the Colombian Caribbean A Bioeconomic Model of Rotational Harvesting Jorge Marco, Diego Valderrama, Mario Rueda, and Maykol R o dr i g ue z - P r i et o Discussion papers are research materials circulated by their authors for purposes of information and discussion. They have not necessarily undergone formal peer review. Central America Chile China Research Program in Economics and Research Nucleus on Environmental and Environmental Economics Program in China Environment for Development in Central Natural Resource Economics (NENRE) (EEPC) America Tropical Agricultural Research and Universidad de Concepción Peking University Higher Education Center (CATIE) Colombia Ghana The Research Group on Environmental, Ethiopia The Environment and Natural Resource Natural Resource and Applied Economics Environment and Climate Research Center Research Unit, Institute of Statistical, Social Studies (REES-CEDE), Universidad de los (ECRC), Policy Studies Institute, Addis and Economic Research, University of Andes, Colombia Ababa, Ethiopia Ghana, Accra India Kenya Nigeria Centre for Research on the Economics of School of Economics Resource and Environmental Policy Climate, Food, Energy, and Environment, University of Nairobi Research Centre, University of Nigeria, (CECFEE), at Indian Statistical Institute, Nsukka New Delhi, India South Africa Tanzania Sweden Environmental Economics Policy Research Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Pearls and Organic Gemstones
    Pearls and Organic Gemstones INTRODUCTION Pearls were probably the first discovered gems of significance. Because they need no cutting or treatment to enhance their beauty and are rare natural occurrences, they have most likely always been highly esteemed. Organic gemstones are anything created by living processes. We have looked at amber in the past, but bone, teeth (such as ivory), and shells all have some value and are used today as gemstones. Pearls in General A pearl is grown by a mollusk (a bivalve such as a clam, oyster, or mussel or snail [single shell = valve]) in response to an irritant. Bivalves (two shelled mollusks) that secrete pearls live in both fresh‐ and saltwater. The irritant in most cases is a parasite (though it could be a grain of sand or other object). The parasite, a worm or other creature, is walled off by a secretion of calcium carbonate and protein. The calcium carbonate is the same as the inorganic material that makes stalactites in caves, and the protein is called conchiolin. The combination of these two substances (calcium carbonate and protein) makes the pearl's nacre (Nacre is also called mother of pearl). The nacre is a lustrous deposit around the irritant and forms concentric layers (overlapping circles). Many concentric layers of nacre build up over a period of a few years creating a pearl. The internal pattern is much like that seen in a jawbreaker. The layers create a sheen or luster that has iridescence and is described as both pearly luster and if colors of the rainbow are present, the pearl's orient.
    [Show full text]
  • Suture with Pointed Flank Lobe and ... -.: Palaeontologia Polonica
    210 JERZY DZIK Genus Posttornoceras Wedekind, 1910 Type species: Posttornoceras balvei Wedekind, 1910 from the mid Famennian Platyclymenia annulata Zone of the Rhenisch Slate Mountains. Diagnosis. — Suture with pointed flank lobe and angular or pointed dorsolateral lobe. Remarks. — Becker (1993b) proposed Exotornoceras for the most primitive members of the lineage with a relatively shallow dorsolateral lobe. The difference seems too minor and continuity too apparent to make this taxonomical subdivision practical. Becker (2002) suggested that this lineage was rooted in Gundolficeras, which is supported by the data from the Holy Cross Mountains. The suture of Posttornoceras is similar to that of Sporadoceras, but these end−members of unrelated lin− eages differ rather significantly in the geometry of the septum (Becker 1993b; Korn 1999). In Posttornoceras the parts of the whorl in contact with the preceding whorl are much less extensive, the dorsolateral saddle is much shorter and of a somewhat angular appearance. This is obviously a reflection of the difference in the whorl expansion rate between the tornoceratids and cheiloceratids. Posttornoceras superstes (Wedekind, 1908) (Figs 154A and 159) Type horizon and locality: Early Famennian at Nehden−Schurbusch, Rhenish Slate Mountains (Becker 1993b). Diagnosis. — Suture with pointed tip of the flank lobe and roundedly angulate dorsolateral lobe. Remarks.—Gephyroceras niedzwiedzkii of Dybczyński (1913) from Sieklucki’s brickpit was repre− sented by a specimen (probably lost) significantly larger than those described by Becker (1993b). The differ− ence in proportions of suture seem to result from this ontogenetic difference, that is mostly from increase of the whorl compression with growth. Distribution. — Reworked at Sieklucki’s brickpit in Kielce.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Cephalopods
    BULLETIN 40 Cambrian Cephalopods BY ROUSSEAU H. FLOWER 1954 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ...................... Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley ......................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Robert W. Botts ...................................................................... Albuquerque Holm 0. Bursum, Jr. ....................................................................... Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ........................................................................ Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio ..................................................................... Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz ................................................................................... Hobbs Contents Page ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................... 1 FOREWORD ................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................. 3 PREVIOUS REPORTS OF CAMBRIAN CEPHALOPODS ................ 4 ADEQUATELY KNOWN CAMBRIAN CEPHALOPODS, with a revision of the Plectronoceratidae ..........................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Population and Reproductive Biology of the Channeled Whelk, Busycotypus Canaliculatus, in the US Mid-Atlantic
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles 2017 Population and Reproductive Biology of the Channeled Whelk, Busycotypus canaliculatus, in the US Mid-Atlantic Robert A. Fisher Virginia Institute of Marine Science, [email protected] David Rudders Virginia Institute of Marine Science, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Fisher, Robert A. and Rudders, David, "Population and Reproductive Biology of the Channeled Whelk, Busycotypus canaliculatus, in the US Mid-Atlantic" (2017). VIMS Articles. 304. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/304 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 36, No. 2, 427–444, 2017. POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE CHANNELED WHELK, BUSYCOTYPUS CANALICULATUS, IN THE US MID-ATLANTIC ROBERT A. FISHER* AND DAVID B. RUDDERS Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, PO Box 1346, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 ABSTRACT Channeled whelks, Busycotypus canaliculatus, support commercial fisheries throughout their range along the US Atlantic seaboard. Given the modest amounts of published information available on channeled whelk, this study focuses on understanding the temporal and spatial variations in growth and reproductive biology in the Mid-Atlantic region. Channeled whelks were sampled from three inshore commercially harvested resource areas in the US Mid-Atlantic: Ocean City, MD (OC); Eastern Shore of Virginia (ES); and Virginia Beach, VA (VB). The largest whelk measured 230-mm shell length (SL) and was recorded from OC.
    [Show full text]
  • A Late Oligocene Or Earliest Miocene Molluscan Fauna from Sitkinak Island, Alaska
    A Late Oligocene or Earliest Miocene Molluscan Fauna From Sitkinak Island, Alaska By RICHARD C. ALLISON and LOUIE MARINCOVICH, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1233 Describes the late Oligocene or earliest Miocene molluscan fauna from the Narrow Cape Formation on Sitkinak Island, noting the mixture of Asiatic, North American, and endemic high-latitude North Pacific taxa. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, &cretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Catal ogi ng in Pub1 ication Data A1 1i son, Richard C., 1935- A late Oligocene or earliest Miocene molluscan fauna from Sitki nak Is1and, A1 aska. ( Geological Survey Professional Paper ; 1233) Bibl iography: p. 9-10. Supt. of Doc. no.: I 19.16:1233 1. Moll usks, Fossil --A1 aska--Si tkinak I sl and. 2. Pal eontol ogy--01 igocene . 3. Pal eontol ogy--Mi ocene . I. Marincovich, Louie. 11. Title. 111. Series. QE801. A44 564' .09798' 4 81-607925 AACR2 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Introduction Faunal composition Age and correlation .................................................................................................................................. Relation to the type Narrow Cape Formation of Kodiak Island Paleoecology ................................................................................................................................................ Water depth Water temperature
    [Show full text]
  • Zwei Miocaene Arten Von Aturia (Nautilaceae)
    Zwei miocaene Arten von Aturia (Nautilaceae) Autor(en): Jung, Peter Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae Band (Jahr): 59 (1966) Heft 1 PDF erstellt am: 29.09.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-163385 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Zwei miocaene Arten von Atavia (Nautilaceae) von Peter Jung (Basel)1) Mit 1 Textfigur und 2 Tafeln ABSTRACT .A neotype of Aturia aturi (Basterot) is designated and figured. Several Miocene species of Aturia from Northern South America, Japan and Australia are believed to be synonyms either of the European A. aturi or the Middle .American A.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. Revision of Buttsoceras. Part II. Notes on the Michelinoceratida
    MEMOIR 10 PART I Revision of Buttsoceras PART II Notes on the Michelinoceratida By ROUSSEAU H. FLOWER 1 9 6 2 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Alvin J. Thompson, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ........................................ Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley .......................................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS William G. Abbott ............................................................................................... Hobbs Holm 0. Bursum, Jr. ......................................................................................... Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ......................................................................................... Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio ...................................................................................... Albuquerque Eva M. Larrazolo (Mrs. Paul F.) ............................................................... Albuquerque Published October I2, 1962 For Sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mex.—Price $2.00 Contents PART I REVISION OF BUTTSOCERAS Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Curriculum Vitae
    NEIL H. LANDMAN CURATOR, CURATOR-IN-CHARGE AND PROFESSOR DIVISION OF PALEONTOLOGY HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED Ph.D. AREA OF SPECIALIZATION Evolution, life history, and systematics of externally shelled cephalopods EDUCATIONAL EXPERIENCE Ph.D. in Geology, Yale University, 1982 M. Phil. in Geology, Yale University, 1977 M.S. in Earth Sciences, Adelphi University, 1975 B.S. in Mathematics, summa cum laude, Polytechnic University of New York, 1972 PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE IN DOCTORAL EDUCATION FACULTY APPOINTMENTS Adjunct Professor, Department of Biology, City College Adjunct Professor, Department of Geology, Brooklyn College GRADUATE ADVISEES Susan Klofak, Biology, CUNY, 1999-present Krystal Kallenberg, Marine Sciences, Stony Brook, 2003-present GRADUATE COMMITTEES Christian Soucier, Biology, Brooklyn College, 2004-present Krystal Kallenberg, Marine Sciences, Stony Brook, 2003-present Yumiko Iwasaki, Geology, CUNY, 2000-2009 Emily Allen, Geology, University of Chicago, 2002-2005 Susan Klofak, Biology, CUNY, 1996-present Claude Monnet, University of Zurich, presently Sophie Low, Geology, Harvard University RESEARCH GRANT SUPPORT Kosciuszko Foundation. Comparative study of ammonite faunas from the United States Western Interior and Polish Lowland. Post-doc: Izabela Ploch, Geological Museum of Polish Geological Institute. 2011. NSF Grant MR1-R2 (Co-PI): Acquisition of a High Resolution CT-Scanner at the American Museum of Natural History: 2010-2013. NSF Grant No. DBI 0619559 (Co-PI): Acquisition of a Variable Pressure SEM at the AMNH: 2006-2009 NSF Grant No. EAR 0308926 (PI): Collaborative Research: Paleobiology, paleoceanography, and paleoclimatology of a time slice through the Western Interior Seaway: 2003-2006 National Science Foundation, Collaborative Research: Soft Tissues and Membrane Preservation in Permian Cephalopods, $40,000, February 1, 2002-January 31, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 10 MOLLUSCS 10.1 a Significant Space A
    PART file:///C:/DOCUME~1/ROBERT~1/Desktop/Z1010F~1/FINALS~1.HTM CHAPTER 10 MOLLUSCS 10.1 A Significant Space A. Evolved a fluid-filled space within the mesoderm, the coelom B. Efficient hydrostatic skeleton; room for networks of blood vessels, the alimentary canal, and associated organs. 10.2 Characteristics A. Phylum Mollusca 1. Contains nearly 75,000 living species and 35,000 fossil species. 2. They have a soft body. 3. They include chitons, tooth shells, snails, slugs, nudibranchs, sea butterflies, clams, mussels, oysters, squids, octopuses and nautiluses (Figure 10.1A-E). 4. Some may weigh 450 kg and some grow to 18 m long, but 80% are under 5 centimeters in size. 5. Shell collecting is a popular pastime. 6. Classes: Gastropoda (snails…), Bivalvia (clams, oysters…), Polyplacophora (chitons), Cephalopoda (squids, nautiluses, octopuses), Monoplacophora, Scaphopoda, Caudofoveata, and Solenogastres. B. Ecological Relationships 1. Molluscs are found from the tropics to the polar seas. 2. Most live in the sea as bottom feeders, burrowers, borers, grazers, carnivores, predators and filter feeders. 1. Fossil evidence indicates molluscs evolved in the sea; most have remained marine. 2. Some bivalves and gastropods moved to brackish and fresh water. 3. Only snails (gastropods) have successfully invaded the land; they are limited to moist, sheltered habitats with calcium in the soil. C. Economic Importance 1. Culturing of pearls and pearl buttons is an important industry. 2. Burrowing shipworms destroy wooden ships and wharves. 3. Snails and slugs are garden pests; some snails are intermediate hosts for parasites. D. Position in Animal Kingdom (see Inset, page 172) E.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Non-Mineralized Cephalopod Jaws and Arm Hooks
    Klug et al. Swiss J Palaeontol (2020) 139:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13358-020-00210-y Swiss Journal of Palaeontology RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access First record of non-mineralized cephalopod jaws and arm hooks from the latest Cretaceous of Eurytania, Greece Christian Klug1* , Donald Davesne2,3, Dirk Fuchs4 and Thodoris Argyriou5 Abstract Due to the lower fossilization potential of chitin, non-mineralized cephalopod jaws and arm hooks are much more rarely preserved as fossils than the calcitic lower jaws of ammonites or the calcitized jaw apparatuses of nautilids. Here, we report such non-mineralized fossil jaws and arm hooks from pelagic marly limestones of continental Greece. Two of the specimens lie on the same slab and are assigned to the Ammonitina; they represent upper jaws of the aptychus type, which is corroborated by fnds of aptychi. Additionally, one intermediate type and one anaptychus type are documented here. The morphology of all ammonite jaws suggest a desmoceratoid afnity. The other jaws are identifed as coleoid jaws. They share the overall U-shape and proportions of the outer and inner lamellae with Jurassic lower jaws of Trachyteuthis (Teudopseina). We also document the frst belemnoid arm hooks from the Tethyan Maastrichtian. The fossils described here document the presence of a typical Mesozoic cephalopod assemblage until the end of the Cretaceous in the eastern Tethys. Keywords: Cephalopoda, Ammonoidea, Desmoceratoidea, Coleoidea, Maastrichtian, Taphonomy Introduction as jaws, arm hooks, and radulae are occasionally found Fossil cephalopods are mainly known from preserved (Matern 1931; Mapes 1987; Fuchs 2006a; Landman et al. mineralized parts such as aragonitic phragmocones 2010; Kruta et al.
    [Show full text]