DOCSLIB.ORG

Part I. Revision of Buttsoceras. Part II. Notes on the Michelinoceratida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part I. Revision of Buttsoceras. Part II. Notes on the Michelinoceratida MEMOIR 10 PART I Revision of Buttsoceras PART II Notes on the Michelinoceratida By ROUSSEAU H. FLOWER 1 9 6 2 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Alvin J. Thompson, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ........................................ Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley .......................................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS William G. Abbott ............................................................................................... Hobbs Holm 0. Bursum, Jr. ......................................................................................... Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ......................................................................................... Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio ...................................................................................... Albuquerque Eva M. Larrazolo (Mrs. Paul F.) ............................................................... Albuquerque Published October I2, 1962 For Sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mex.—Price $2.00 Contents PART I REVISION OF BUTTSOCERAS Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 2 A NOTE ON SPECIFIC CRITERIA ............................................................................................................ 3 BUTTSOCERAS ULRICH AND FOERSTE .............................................................................................. 3 Buttsoceras williamsi Flower, n. sp. .............................................................................................................. 4 Buttsoceras novemexicanum Flower, n. sp. .................................................................................................... 5 Buttsoceras cf. novemexicanum Flower .......................................................................................................... 7 Buttsoceras adamsi (Butts) ............................................................................................................................. 7 Stratigraphy of Buttsoceras .............................................................................................................................. 8 The problem of Oxfordoceras ......................................................................................................................... 8 MICHELINOCERAS FOERSTE ................................................................................................................ 10 Michelinoceras primum Flower, n. sp. ......................................................................................................... 11 Michelinoceras buttsi Flower, n. sp. ............................................................................................................ 12 Michelinoceras vandiverense (Ulrich, Foerste, Miller, and Unklesbay) .................................................... 12 Michelinoceras (?) richardsi Flower, n. sp 12 FAMILY TROEDSSONELLIDAE KOBAYASHI 1935 ........................................................................ 14 PART II NOTES ON THE MICHELINOCERATIDA ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 INTRODUCTION 21 ACKNOWLEDGMENT ............................................................................................................................... 21 ORDER MICHELINOCERATIDA............................................................................................................ 22 FAMILY MICHELINOCERATIDAE FLOWER 1945 ......................................................................... 25 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED FAMILIES OF THE MICHELINOCERATIDA ....................................................................................................................... 27 Family Allumettoceratidae Flower, 1946 .............................................................................................. 27 Family Bactritidae Hyatt, 1883 ............................................................................................................... 27 Family Choanoceratidae Miller, 1932 .................................................................................................... 27 Family Clinoceratidae Flower, 1946 ...................................................................................................... 27 Family Cycloceratidae Hyatt, 1893 ........................................................................................................ 27 Family Eskimoceratidae Shimizu and Obata, 1936 ............................................................................. 27 Page Family Geisonoceratidae Zhuravleva, 1959 ....................................................................................... 28 Family Greenlandoceratidae Shimizu and Obata, 1935 ................................................................... 28 Family Hammelloceratidae Shimizu and Obata, 1935 ...................................................................... 28 Family Kionoceratidae Hyatt, 1900 ..................................................................................................... 28 Family Loxoceratidae Hyatt, 1900 ....................................................................................................... 28 Family Mooreoceratidae Shimansky, 1954 ......................................................................................... 29 Family Ohioceratidae Shimizu and Obata, 1935 ............................................................................... 29 Family Orthoceratidae McCoy, 1884 .................................................................................................. 29 Family Orthocerotidae Teichert and Miller, 1936 ............................................................................. 29 Family Pseudorthoceratidae Flower and Caster, 1935 ..................................................................... 29 Family Sactorthoceratidae Flower, 1946 ............................................................................................. 30 Family Sinoceratidae Shimizu and Obata, 1935 ................................................................................ 30 Family Spyroceratidae Shimizu and Obata, 1935 .............................................................................. 30 Family Stereoplasmoceratidae Kobayashi, 1934 ................................................................................ 30 Family Striatoceratide Flower, 1939 (a) ............................................................................................... 31 Family Troedssonoceratidae Kobayashi, 1935 .................................................................................. 31 NEW FAMILY PROPOSALS ..................................................................................................................... 32 Family Proteoceratidae Flower, new family ....................................................................................... 32 Family Offleyoceratidae Flower, new family ...................................................................................... 33 Family Sphooceratidae Flower, new family ........................................................................................ 33 Genus Sphooceras Flower, n. gen. ....................................................................................................... 33 Family Engorthoceratidae Flower, new family .................................................................................. 34 Genus Engorthoceras Flower, n. gen. .................................................................................................. 34 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE MORPHOLOGY OF SOME M IC H ELINOCERATIDA ................................................................................................................... 35 Orthoceros Brunnich ............................................................................................................................. 35 Orthoceros regularis (Schotheim) ........................................................................................................... 35 Pleurorthoceras Flower, n. gen. 35 Pleurorthoceras clarksvillense (Foerste) ................................................................................................... 35 Pleurorthoceras clarksvillense (Foerste) ................................................................................................... 36 Pleurorthoceras selkirkense (Whiteaves) ................................................................................................. 36 FAMILY DAWSONOCERATIDAE ..................................................................................................... 39 Dawsonoceras Hyatt, 1883 ..................................................................................................................... 39 Dawsonoceras cf.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nautiloid Shell Morphology
    MEMOIR 13 Nautiloid Shell Morphology By ROUSSEAU H. FLOWER STATEBUREAUOFMINESANDMINERALRESOURCES NEWMEXICOINSTITUTEOFMININGANDTECHNOLOGY CAMPUSSTATION SOCORRO, NEWMEXICO MEMOIR 13 Nautiloid Shell Morphology By ROUSSEAU H. FLOIVER 1964 STATEBUREAUOFMINESANDMINERALRESOURCES NEWMEXICOINSTITUTEOFMININGANDTECHNOLOGY CAMPUSSTATION SOCORRO, NEWMEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Alvin J. Thompson, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EXOFFICIO THEHONORABLEJACKM.CAMPBELL ................................ Governor of New Mexico LEONARDDELAY() ................................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTEDMEMBERS WILLIAM G. ABBOTT ................................ ................................ ............................... Hobbs EUGENE L. COULSON, M.D ................................................................. Socorro THOMASM.CRAMER ................................ ................................ ................... Carlsbad EVA M. LARRAZOLO (Mrs. Paul F.) ................................................. Albuquerque RICHARDM.ZIMMERLY ................................ ................................ ....... Socorro Published February 1 o, 1964 For Sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mex.—Price $2.50 Contents Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • New Fossil Finds from the Cambro-Silurian Meta-Sediments on Hardangervidda
    New Fossil Finds from the Cambro-Silurian Meta-sediments on Hardangervidda ARILD ANDRESEN Andresen, A. 1974: New fossil finds from the Cambro-Silurian meta-sedi ments on Hardangervidda. Norges geol. Unders. 304, 55-60. The occurrence of Actinoceroid cephalopods {Ormoceras (?) sp.), brachiopods {Orthis ss.), and trilobites {Ptycbopyge sp.) in a crystalline limestone over lying bluish quartzite on Hardangervidda indicates that Orthoceras Limestone of the Lower Ordovician Asaphus Series (Etage 3c) is present. The underlying quartzites are correlated with stage 3a-3b in the Oslo Region. A. Andresen, Mineralogisk-Geologisk Museum, Sarsgt. 1, Oslo 5, Norway Introduction Hardangervidda (Fig. 1) is, outside the Oslo Region, one of the largest areas in Norway where Cambro-Silurian sediments of eastern facies (foreland fac ies) are exposed. The stratigraphy and structure of these rocks are not very well known, partly because of the inaccessibility of the area, and partly due to the intense deformation and lack of fossiliferous beds. Even though the fossils described in this paper are badly preserved, making identification of species in some cases uncertain and in other cases impossible, they give some information about the Cambro-Silurian stratigraphy. The earliest contribution to the geology of Hardangervidda was made by Dahll (1861), who reported fossiliferous beds with Dictyonema flabelliforme (2e in the stratigraphic sequence of the Oslo Region) from Holberget (Fig. 1). Later, Brøgger (1893), after more detailed mapping, established a strati graphic sequence for the rocks overlying the Precambrian basement. In this sequence all the rocks above the Precambrian basement were assumed to be in a normal succession. The subdivision he established was, from the base upwards: 1, Alum shale; 2, Quartizite; 3, Crystalline limestone (marble); 4, Phyllites; 5, Various crystalline rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Cephalopods
    BULLETIN 40 Cambrian Cephalopods BY ROUSSEAU H. FLOWER 1954 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Eugene Callaghan, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS Ex OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ...................... Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley ......................................... Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS Robert W. Botts ...................................................................... Albuquerque Holm 0. Bursum, Jr. ....................................................................... Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ........................................................................ Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio ..................................................................... Los Alamos A. A. Kemnitz ................................................................................... Hobbs Contents Page ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................... 1 FOREWORD ................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................. 3 PREVIOUS REPORTS OF CAMBRIAN CEPHALOPODS ................ 4 ADEQUATELY KNOWN CAMBRIAN CEPHALOPODS, with a revision of the Plectronoceratidae ..........................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions in BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 51 November 29, 1982 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Families J. John Sepkoski, Jr. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions in BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 51 November 29, 1982 A COMPENDIUM OF FOSSIL MARINE FAMILIES J. JOHN SEPKOSKI, JR. Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago REVIEWERS FOR THIS PUBLICATION: Robert Gernant, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee David M. Raup, Field Museum of Natural History Frederick R. Schram, San Diego Natural History Museum Peter M. Sheehan, Milwaukee Public Museum ISBN 0-893260-081-9 Milwaukee Public Museum Press Published by the Order of the Board of Trustees CONTENTS Abstract ---- ---------- -- - ----------------------- 2 Introduction -- --- -- ------ - - - ------- - ----------- - - - 2 Compendium ----------------------------- -- ------ 6 Protozoa ----- - ------- - - - -- -- - -------- - ------ - 6 Porifera------------- --- ---------------------- 9 Archaeocyatha -- - ------ - ------ - - -- ---------- - - - - 14 Coelenterata -- - -- --- -- - - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - - -- -- - -- 17 Platyhelminthes - - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- -- --- - - - - - - 24 Rhynchocoela - ---- - - - - ---- --- ---- - - ----------- - 24 Priapulida ------ ---- - - - - -- - - -- - ------ - -- ------ 24 Nematoda - -- - --- --- -- - -- --- - -- --- ---- -- - - -- -- 24 Mollusca ------------- --- --------------- ------ 24 Sipunculida ---------- --- ------------ ---- -- --- - 46 Echiurida ------ - --- - - - - - --- --- - -- --- - -- - - ---
    [Show full text]
  • Rendspi 1-Studies
    Rendiconti della Società Paleontologica Italiana 3 (I) The Silurian of Sardinia volume in honour of Enrico Serpagli Edited by Carlo Corradini Annalisa Ferretti Petr Storch Società Paleontologica Italiana 2009 I Rendiconti della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 3 (1), 2009: 109-118 Silurian nautiloid cephalopods from Sardinia: the state of the art MAURIZIO GNOLI, PAOLO SERVENTI Maurizio Gnoli - Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, largo S. Eufemia 19, I- 41100 Modena (Italy); [email protected] Paolo Serventi - Dipartimento del Museo di Paleobiologia e dell’Orto Botanico, via Università 4, I-41100 Modena (Italy); [email protected] ABSTRACT - The complete faunal list of nautiloid cephalopods from the Silurian of Sardinia has been compiled herein. A history leading to the present state of knowledge on this fossil group, achieved after forty years of extensive study, is reviewed. A total of 61 species assigned to 38 genera are known from the Wenlock-Pridoli of southern Sardinia. The fauna strongly supports links with coeval associations of Bohemia and, to a lesser extent, with the Carnic Alps. KEY WORDS - Silurian, Sardinia, Cephalopods, Palaeogeography. INTRODUCTION This paper represents the nautiloid cephalopod sum up of more than forty years of scientific activity within the informal International Group on the Palaeozoic Palaeontology headed by Prof. Enrico Serpagli, who devoted most of his research to the Italian Palaeozoic outcrops mainly in two areas, the Carnic Alps and southern Sardinia. During these years, many field trips have been carried out in Sardinia allowing the collection of an enormous amount of samples studied in detail in their palaeontological (either taxonomic or biostratigraphical) content by Italian, German, English, Irish, Spanish, Swedish and Czech members of the research team.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamellorthoceratid Cephalopods in the Cold Waters of Southwestern Gondwana: Evidences from the Lower Devonian of Argentina
    Lamellorthoceratid cephalopods in the cold waters of southwestern Gondwana: Evidences from the Lower Devonian of Argentina MARCELA CICHOWOLSKI and JUAN JOSÉ RUSTÁN Cichowolski, M. and Rustán, J.J. 2020. Lamellorthoceratid cephalopods in the cold waters of southwestern Gondwana: Evidences from the Lower Devonian of Argentina. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 65 (2): 305–312. Based on three specimens assigned to Arthrophyllum sp., the family Lamellorthoceratidae is reported from the Lower Devonian Talacasto Formation in the Precordillera Basin, central western Argentina. These Devonian cephalopods have been known only from low to mid palaeolatitudes and its presence in the cold water settings of southwestern Gondwana is notable. A nektonic mode of life, not strictly demersal but eventually pelagic, with a horizontal orientation of the conch is proposed for adults lamellorthoceratids, whereas a planktonic habit is suggested for juvenile individuals. These features would had allow their arrival to this southern basin, explaining their unusual presence in the Malvinokaffric Realm, and reinforcing the need of re-evaluate the distribution pattern of several groups of cephalopods. Key words: Cephalopoda, Lamellorthoceratidae, Arthrophyllum, Palaeozoic, Talacasto Formation, Malvinokaffric Realm, Precordillera Basin, Argentina. Marcela Cichowolski [[email protected]], Instituto de Estudios Andinos “Don Pablo Groeber” (IDEAN), CON- ICET, and Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pab. 2, C1428EGA, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Juan J. Rustán [[email protected]], Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra (CICTERRA), Centro de Investigaciones Paleobiológicas (CIPAL), CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield Nº 1611, X5016GCA, Córdoba, Argentina and Universidad Nacional de La Rioja, M. de la Fuente s/n, CP 5300, La Rioja, Argentina.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carboniferous Evolution of Nova Scotia
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 The Carboniferous evolution of Nova Scotia J. H. CALDER Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, PO Box 698, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2T9 Abstract: Nova Scotia during the Carboniferous lay at the heart of palaeoequatorial Euramerica in a broadly intermontane palaeoequatorial setting, the Maritimes-West-European province; to the west rose the orographic barrier imposed by the Appalachian Mountains, and to the south and east the Mauritanide-Hercynide belt. The geological affinity of Nova Scotia to Europe, reflected in elements of the Carboniferous flora and fauna, was mirrored in the evolution of geological thought even before the epochal visits of Sir Charles Lyell. The Maritimes Basin of eastern Canada, born of the Acadian-Caledonian orogeny that witnessed the suture of Iapetus in the Devonian, and shaped thereafter by the inexorable closing of Gondwana and Laurasia, comprises a near complete stratal sequence as great as 12 km thick which spans the Middle Devonian to the Lower Permian. Across the southern Maritimes Basin, in northern Nova Scotia, deep depocentres developed en echelon adjacent to a transform platelet boundary between terranes of Avalon and Gondwanan affinity. The subsequent history of the basins can be summarized as distension and rifting attended by bimodal volcanism waning through the Dinantian, with marked transpression in the Namurian and subsequent persistence of transcurrent movement linking Variscan deformation with Mauritainide-Appalachian convergence and Alleghenian thrusting. This Mid- Carboniferous event is pivotal in the Carboniferous evolution of Nova Scotia. Rapid subsidence adjacent to transcurrent faults in the early Westphalian was succeeded by thermal sag in the later Westphalian and ultimately by basin inversion and unroofing after the early Permian as equatorial Pangaea finally assembled and subsequently rifted again in the Triassic.
    [Show full text]
  • Colour Patterns in Early Devonian Cephalopods from the Barrandian Area: Taphonomy and Taxonomy
    Colour patterns in Early Devonian cephalopods from the Barrandian Area: Taphonomy and taxonomy VOJTĚCH TUREK Turek, V. 2009. Colour patterns in Early Devonian cephalopods from the Barrandian Area: Taphonomy and taxonomy. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54 (3): 491–502. DOI: 10.4202/app.2007.0064. Five cephalopod specimens from the Lower Devonian of Bohemia (Czech Republic) preserve colour patterns. They in− clude two taxonomically undeterminable orthoceratoids and three oncocerid nautiloids assigned to the genus Ptenoceras. The two fragments of orthocone cephalopods from the lowest Devonian strata (Lochkovian, Monograptus uniformis Zone) display colour patterns unusual in orthoceratoids. They have irregular undulating and zigzag strips that are pre− served on counterparts of adapertural regions of specimens flattened in shale, despite their original aragonitic shell having been completely dissolved. These are probably the result of the proteinous pigment inside the shell wall, being substituted during diagenesis by secondary minerals leaving only an altered trace of the original shell. Orthoceratoids from sediments unsuitable for preservation of this feature discussed here thus demonstrate an exceptional case of preservation of colour patterns, not only within Devonian cephalopods but also within other Devonian molluscs. Three specimens of Ptenoceras that preserve colour patterns come from younger Lower Devonian strata. Oblique spiral adaperturally bifurcating bands are preserved in P. alatum from the Pragian and zigzags in P. nudum from the Dalejan. Juvenile specimen of Ptenoceras? sp. from the Pragian exhibits highly undulating transversal bands—a pattern resembling colour markings in some Silu− rian oncocerids. Dark grey wavy lines observed on the superficially abraded adapical part of a phragmocone of nautiloid Pseudorutoceras bolli and interpreted formerly to be colour markings are here reinterpreted as secondary pigmented growth lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
    SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIOXS. 227 AEEANGEMENT FAMILIES OF MOLLUSKS. PREPARED FOR THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION BY THEODORE GILL, M. D., Ph.D. WASHINGTON: PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, FEBRUARY, 1871. ^^1 I ADVERTISEMENT. The following list has been prepared by Dr. Theodore Gill, at the request of the Smithsonian Institution, for the purpose of facilitating the arrangement and classification of the Mollusks and Shells of the National Museum ; and as frequent applica- tions for such a list have been received by the Institution, it has been thought advisable to publish it for more extended use. JOSEPH HENRY, Secretary S. I. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, January, 1871 ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION, FEBRUARY 28, 1870. (iii ) CONTENTS. VI PAGE Order 17. Monomyaria . 21 " 18. Rudista , 22 Sub-Branch Molluscoidea . 23 Class Tunicata , 23 Order 19. Saccobranchia . 23 " 20. Dactjlobranchia , 24 " 21. Taeniobranchia , 24 " 22. Larvalia , 24 Class Braehiopoda . 25 Order 23. Arthropomata , 25 " . 24. Lyopomata , 26 Class Polyzoa .... 27 Order 25. Phylactolsemata . 27 " 26. Gymnolseraata . 27 " 27. Rhabdopleurse 30 III. List op Authors referred to 31 IV. Index 45 OTRODUCTIO^. OBJECTS. The want of a complete and consistent list of the principal subdivisions of the mollusks having been experienced for some time, and such a list being at length imperatively needed for the arrangement of the collections of the Smithsonian Institution, the present arrangement has been compiled for that purpose. It must be considered simply as a provisional list, embracing the results of the most recent and approved researches into the systematic relations and anatomy of those animals, but from which innova- tions and peculiar views, affecting materially the classification, have been excluded.
    [Show full text]
  • 1540 Evans.Vp
    An early Silurian (Aeronian) cephalopod fauna from Kopet-Dagh, north-eastern Iran: including the earliest records of non-orthocerid cephalopods from the Silurian of Northern Gondwana DAVID H. EVANS, MANSOUREH GHOBADI POUR, LEONID E. POPOV & HADI JAHANGIR The cephalopod fauna from the Aeronian Qarebil Limestone of north-eastern Iran comprises the first comprehensive re- cord of early Silurian cephalopods from peri-Gondwana. Although consisting of relatively few taxa, the assemblage in- cludes members of the orders Oncocerida, Discosorida, Barrandeocerida and Orthocerida. Coeval records of several of these taxa are from low palaeolatitude locations that include Laurentia, Siberia, Baltica and Avalonia, and are otherwise unknown from peri-Gondwana until later in the Silurian. The cephalopod assemblage occurs in cephalopod limestones that currently represent the oldest record of such limestones in the Silurian of the peri-Gondwana margin. The appear- ance of these cephalopods, together with the development of cephalopod limestones may be attributed to the relatively low latitudinal position of central Iran and Kopet-Dagh compared with that of the west Mediterranean sector during the Aeronian. This, combined with the continued post-glacial warming after the Hirnantian glaciation, facilitated the initia- tion of carbonate deposition and conditions suitable for the development of the cephalopod limestones whilst permitting the migration of cephalopod taxa, many of which were previously restricted to lower latitudes. • Key words: Llandovery, Aeronian, Cephalopoda, palaebiogeography, peri-Gondwana. EVANS, D.H., GHOBADI POUR, M., POPOV,L.E.&JAHANGIR, H. 2015. An Early Silurian (Aeronian) cephalopod fauna from Kopet-Dagh, north-eastern Iran: including the earliest records of non-orthocerid cephalopods from the Silurian of Northern Gondwana.
    [Show full text]
  • Colour Patterns on Silurian Orthocerid and Pseudorthocerid Conchs from Gotland – Palaeoecological Implications
    Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2015, 64, 1, 74–79 doi: 10.3176/earth.2015.13 Colour patterns on Silurian orthocerid and pseudorthocerid conchs from Gotland – palaeoecological implications Štěpán Mandaa and Vojtěch Turekb a Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, 11821 Praha 1, Czech Republic; [email protected] b National Museum, Department of Palaeontology, Václavské náměstí 68, 115 79 Praha 1, Czech Republic; [email protected] Received 30 June 2014, accepted 17 October 2014 Abstract. The longitudinal colour pattern – an adaptively controlled feature functioning in cephalopods as camouflage – is described in two straight-shelled cephalopods from the Silurian of Gotland. A shell of the orthocerid Dawsonoceras annulatum (Sowerby) exhibits relatively broad longitudinal colour bands around the entire shell circumference, which in combination with transverse annuli and undulated growth ridges form a visually reticulate ornament. Such a combination is not known in other Silurian straight-shelled cephalopods. Dawsonoceras annulatum is the only known Palaeozoic cephalopod retaining an almost identical colour pattern in populations inhabiting different palaeo-continents. The shell of the pseudorthocerid Lyecoceras? columnare (Marklin) has densely packed narrow longitudinal colour bands on the entire smooth shell. In this feature the species is very similar to other Silurian and Ordovician pseudorthocerids. However, in Ordovician pseudorthocerids colour bands are restricted dorsally. The type of colouration described herein differs from that of Devonian and younger pseudorthocerids where the shell bears zig-zag bands. Longitudinal colouration around the entire shell circumference supports vertical or subvertical life orientation in both described species. Key words: Silurian, Orthocerida, Pseudorthocerida, colour pattern, palaeoecology. INTRODUCTION poorly known in comparison with oncocerids and discosorids (Nautiloidea).
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Peninsula
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MICHIGAN. For this object I have zealously worked. How far I have succeeded in the effort the reader may judge; and I shall feel well satisfied if he finds the picture I give worth UPPER PENINSULA attentive study, without having it surrounded by a 1869-1873 borrowed glistening frame, composed of a collection of ACCOMPANIED BY AN items from almost every branch of human knowledge. ATLAS OF MAPS. Very respectfully yours, C. ROMINGER. VOL. I. PART III. PALÆOZOIC ROCKS. INTRODUCTION. BY DR. C. ROMINGER BY the Legislative Assembly of 1871, the continuation of a geological survey of the State of Michigan was determined upon, in such a manner as to divide the work PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATURE OF into three districts, each of which was to be investigated MICHIGAN. independently by different parties. UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. The third district, intrusted to me, comprises the Lower Peninsula, and the eastern half of the Upper Peninsula, NEW YORK or that portion which Is not included in the iron and JULIUS BIEN copper regions. Its surface rock is exclusively 1873 composed of members of the palæozoic series; while In Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1873, by the other two, older crystalline and metamorphic rocks GOVERNOR J. J. BAGLEY, prevail. for the State of Michigan, in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. On the Lower Peninsula only a partial reconnoissance TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF tour has been made through Little Traverse Bay region.
    [Show full text]