DOCSLIB.ORG

0208 Committee on Oil Shale, Coal, and Related Minerals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Colorado Legislative Council Research All Publications Publications 12-1974 0208 Committee on Oil Shale, Coal, and Related Minerals Colorado Legislative Council Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/colc_all Recommended Citation Colorado Legislative Council, "0208 Committee on Oil Shale, Coal, and Related Minerals" (1974). All Publications. 216. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/colc_all/216 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Legislative Council Research Publications at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. Report to the Governor and the Colorado General Assembly: COMMITTEE ON OIL SHALE, COAL, AND RELATED MINERALS L~glslrtlvrCouncil Research Publication No. 208 Docembet, 1874 CO/OPOI4l Ao. Genee'c<-T / Assem+/y, COMMITTEE ON OIL SHALE, C&L, AND RELATED MINERALS Report To The Governor and General Assembly Colorado Legislative Council Research Publication No. 208 December, 1974 COLORADO GENERAL ASSEMBLY OFFICERS MEMBERS SEN. FRED E. ANDERSON SEN. JOSEPH V. CALABRESE (:trnirr~rrrrr SEN. VINCENT MAlSARl REP. CLARENCE QUINLAN VII:~Chorrrnen SEN. RICHARD H. PLOCK JR. SEN. JOSEPH 8. SCHlEFFELlN STAFF LYLE C. KYLE SEN. RUTH S. STOCKTON 01ru~tur SEN. TED L. STRICKLAND DAVID F. MORRISSEY REP. JOHN D. FUHR A ;*I :111nt 0,rurtor LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL STANLEY ELOFSON ROOM 46 STATE CAPITOL REP. CARL H. OUSTAFSON Prrnr ,pol Annlyst DENVER, COLORADO 80203 REP. HIRAM A. McNElL DAVID HlTE 892-2285 REP. PHILLIP MASSARI Prrrr( rpal Analyst AREA CODE 303 RICHARD LEVENGOOO REP. HUBERT M. SAFRAN P~rf~rrpalAnalyst REP. RONALD H. SlRAHLE ALLAN GREEN S~~nrr~rAnalyst WALLACE PULLIAM Srnror Analyst EARL THAXTON St~nlorAnalyst LENNY R. ARNOLD Rt \(.arch 4ssucrete JAMES HENDERSON Ht.~t~e~chAssooetc DENNIS A. JAKUBOWSKI R~s\u~rrlti Assocrate To the Governor and Members of the General Assembly: Submitted herewith is the final report of the Committee on Oil Shale, Coal, and Related Minerals, a creature of the 1974 session of the Colorado Gen- eral Assembly (H.J.R. 1008). The committee and staff toiled mightily throughout the summer and au- tumn to try and shed some light on the complexities of oil shale, coal, and certain other mineral de- velopments. This report contains the findings and recommendations of themq, committee. Michael L. Strann Chairman TABLE OF CONTENTS Pane LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL.................................. iii LIST OF BILLS .................................... vii SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS................... 1 MINORITY REPORTS ....................................... 13 COMMITTEE FINDINGS ..................................... 35 Preface........................................... 35 Location of Oil Shale Deposits .................... 39 Extraction and Production of Shale Oil ............ 47 Industry Development .............................. 59 Industry Size Projections ......................... 71 Public v . Private Development of Oil Shale ........ 75 Revenues from the Industry ........................ 81 Selected Impacts .................................. 87 Coal Development in Colorado ...................... 109 APPENDICES Appendix A .. Taxation of Mineral Resources in Colorado ......................... 115 Appendix B .. Draft Statement of Need. Goal. and Objectives .. Technical Assistance Program............................. 127 Appendix C .. Tax Lead Time Study for the Oil Shale Region.................... m... 133 LIST OF BILLS Page Bill 1 -- Concerning Energy, and Creating the Office of Coordinator of Energy Problems in the Office of the Governor, and Mak- ing an Appropriation Therefor................ 19 Bill 2 -- Concerning the Oil Shale Special Fund, and Providing for the Disposition of Interest Earned Thereon...................... 23 Bill 3 -- Concerning the Imposition of Use Taxes by Counties................................ 25 Bill4 -- Concerning Development Revenue Bonds......... 33 vii COMMITTEE ON OIL SHALE, COAL, AND RELATED MINERALS Members of the Committee Rep. Michael Strang, Sen. Fay DeBerard, Chairman Vice-chairman Rep. Tilman Bishop Sen. Les Fowler Rep. Bob Kirscht Sen. Dan Noble Rep. Larry OIBrian Sen. Maurice Parker Rep. Morgan Smith Sen. Albert Ruland Staff Legislative Legislative Council Drafting Office Allan Green Doug Brown Peter Nichols John Lansdowne COMMITTEE ON OIL SHALE, COAL, AND RELATED MINERALS SUMMARY OF REC OMMENDAT1ONS The Committee on Oil Shale, Coal and Related Minerals was created by House Joint Resolution 1008 of the 1974 ses- sion of the Colorado General Assembly. This resolution direc- ted the committee to study the following: - Equitable methods of taxation, including the advis- ability of severance taxes; - Socioeconomic consequences of extensive mineral development; - Incentives for industry to develop innovative tech- nology for extraction of minerals, such as situ as opposed to open mining; - The impact of oil shale development on water resour- ces of the Colorado River Basin, and the feasi- bility of employing oil shale development methods which use the least practicable volume of water or employ the saline ground waters of the PiceanceBasin; - Utilization of the enormous reserves of sodium miner- als, dawsonite, and nacholite which occur throughout the oil shale formations; and - Analysis of long-range priorities to protect the citizens of Colorado from national exploitation of minerals on Colorado lands. At its first meeting, the committee agreed that it would be necessary to limit the scope of its deliberations during the 1974 interim and thus confined itself to a studyof oil shale, coal, and sodium minerals associated with oil shala deposits. Although all of the specific items charged to the committee for consideration were examined, primary emphasis was devoted to methods of taxation and socioeconomic consequen- ces. With regard to innovative technology, water usage, and utilization of related mineral reserves, the committee examined the oil shale processes proposed by each company. In order to compile the necessary background information, the committee toured each site that is presently proposed for a commercial oil shale facility and conducted public hearings in Grand Junction, Grand Valley, Rifle, Rangely, Craig, Hayden, Steamboat Springs, and Walden to learn from local officials and residents of their needs and concerns relative to impact from oil shale and coal development. The committee also visited a coal strip mine in Routt County to view reclamation efforts. In July, senior corporate representatives of principal oil shale concerns appeared before the committee in Grand Junc- tion to detail their plans for development and explain their planning for community impact. In addition, representatives of major coal companies and public utilities testified before the committee. The committee recommends four bills for consideration by the 1975 session of the General Assembly. Bill 1 would create the office of Energy Coordinator in the Governor's of- fice. Bills 2, 3, and 4 are the result of the committee's review of proposals contained in the Tax Lead Time Study, a report commissioned by a subcommittee of the Governor's Oil Shale Advisory Committee. Bill 2 would separate the interest on investment from the principal of state revenues from oil shale leases, thereby relieving these monies from the federal restrictions. Bill 3 would provide enabling legislation for counties to enact a use tax and Bill 4 would expand the defi- nition of "pr~ject'~for industrial development revenue bonds. In addition, the committee recommends three concepts for consideration by the General Assembly: (1) a severance tax on oil shale; (2) a revision of coal taxation statutes; and (3) a technical assistance program for planning for oil shale impact in region 11, to be funded by the state and feder- al governments and industry. The committee concluded that changes in the federal Min- eral Leasing Act of 1920 would be appropriate to assist the state in meeting impacts from oil shale development which may extend beyond schools and roads. Further, the committee urged the federal government to provide program funds to meet im- pacts created by federal actions. It is also recommended that the federal government guarantee local bonds and agree to a land exchange between the Superior Oil Company and the Bureau of Land Management. In other actions, the committee recommended that an ap- pendix be prepared to the report of the Governor's Oil Shale Coordinator to reflect recent changes in oil shale development plans and that the oil shale industry be encouraged to provide funds forfacilities to impacted local governments. Recognition of the needs for additional study was made by the committee in recommending that the Legislative Council's Committee on State and Local Finance examine increasing the limit on county general fund mill levies, changing the formula for state aid to the public schools, and revising property tax assessment dates. The committee also recommended that the General Assembly study the feasibility of granting counties the authority to levy general occupation taxes. I. Recommendations of Bills State Coordinator of Energy Problems -- Bill I During the course of committee hearings and inquiries, it became apparent that the state has no single source of information concerning energy problems and potential develop- ment.
Recommended publications
  • EMD Oil Shale Committee

    EMD Oil Shale Committee

    EMD Oil Shale Committee 2017 EMD Oil Shale Committee Report Justin E. Birdwell (Chair), U.S. Geological Survey November 29, 2017 Vice-Chairs: • Gerald Daub (Vice-Chair: Industry), Daub & Associates, Inc. • Dr. Lauren Birgenheier (Vice-Chair: University), University of Utah • Michael D. Vanden Berg (Vice-Chair: Government), Utah Geological Survey Advisory Group: • Dr. Alan K. Burnham, Stanford University • Dr. Jeremy Boak, Oklahoma Geological Survey, University of Oklahoma • Mr. Ronald C. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey Special Consultants to the Committee: • John Parsons, QER Pty Ltd • Gary Aho, Sage Geotech • Indrek Aarna, Eesti Energia • Rikki Hrenko-Browning, Enefit American Oil • Ryan Clerico, Enefit American Oil • Alex Bocock, Red Leaf Resources • Christopher Hopkins, Canshale Corp. • Steven Kerr, Millcreek Mining Group • Steven Odut, Thyssenkrupp • Pierre Allix, Total S.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Low oil prices continue to hamper oil shale development around the world. Although new production capacity in Estonia and China has come online recently, efforts in other places are on indefinite hiatus or are well behind schedule relative to what was anticipated just a few years ago. The current status remains in flux, and recent developments in conventional and unconventional crude oil plays in the United States and elsewhere indicate this will not change anytime soon. Oil shale continues to be mined processed in China and Brazil, but production updates for 2016 were not available as of the preparation of this report. In Estonia, Eesti Energia (Enefit) continued development of their co-generation Auvere power plant that is designed to utilize both oil shale and other fuel sources (wood chips, peat, gas).
  • HISTORY of WESTERN OIL SHALE HISTORY of WESTERN OIL SHALE

    HISTORY of WESTERN OIL SHALE HISTORY of WESTERN OIL SHALE

    / _... i';C4 - SHELF , Historyof Western Oil Shale Paul L. Russell . " The Center for Professional Advancement Paul Russell received his degree from the University of Arizona. After working for Industry for five years, he began his involvement with oil shale in 1948 when he joined the U.S. Bureau of Mines and was assigned to Rifle, Colorado, to work at Anvil Points. During the middle fifties, he was assigned to the Atomic Energy Com­ mission to study the extraction of ura­ nium from the Chattanooga Shales in Tennessee. He became Research Director of the U.S. Bureau ofMines in 1967 and served in this capacity until he retired in 1979. During these years his involvement with oil shale intensified. Currently, he is an engineering consultant. ISBN: 0-86563-000-3 ,._-------_._.. V.D.ALLRED 6016 SOUTH BANNOCK LI7TLETON. COLO. 80120 ....~ ...........~..... This compelling history spans 65 years of western oil shale development from its begin­ ning to the present day. These were the years in which most of the present-day retorting pro­ cesses were invented and devel­ oped,leading to present studies of in-situ retorting, and to the resumption of leasing of fed­ eral oil shale lands. The many excellent illustra­ tions and contemporary photo­ graphs in themselves provide a pictorial record of an era when the United States was "wild over oil"-an era when Gov­ ernment estimates of billions of barrels of oil in western oil shales were used to advan­ tage for questionable-if not fraudulent-stock promotions designed to raise capital for development, or to fatten the promoters' pockets.
  • Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development

    Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development

    5th Edition Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______________________________________________________________________________ Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development Prepared by INTEK, Inc. For the U.S. Department of Energy • Office of Petroleum Reserves Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Fifth Edition: September 2011 Note to Readers Regarding the Revised Edition (September 2011) This report was originally prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy in June 2007. The report and its contents have since been revised and updated to reflect changes and progress that have occurred in the domestic oil shale and tar sands industries since the first release and to include profiles of additional companies engaged in oil shale and tar sands resource and technology development. Each of the companies profiled in the original report has been extended the opportunity to update its profile to reflect progress, current activities and future plans. Acknowledgements This report was prepared by INTEK, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Petroleum Reserves, Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves (DOE/NPOSR) as a part of the AOC Petroleum Support Services, LLC (AOC- PSS) Contract Number DE-FE0000175 (Task 30). Mr. Khosrow Biglarbigi of INTEK, Inc. served as the Project Manager. AOC-PSS and INTEK, Inc. wish to acknowledge the efforts of representatives of the companies that provided information, drafted revised or reviewed company profiles, or addressed technical issues associated with their companies, technologies, and project efforts. Special recognition is also due to those who directly performed the work on this report. Mr. Peter M. Crawford, Director at INTEK, Inc., served as the principal author of the report.
  • Technology Base

    Technology Base

    I onl,l unlaoa I t' I ' f xtracting oil from shale has always E b""n-"t best-an expensive, risky proposition. Even now, as oil shale gradu- ally lumbers toward commercial produc- tion, some doubs linger about whether or not producing oil from shale will prove profitable, particularly in light of today's economics. But at Paraho Development CorP. in Technology Base Crand Junction, CO, no such unce(ainties seem to exist, and managers of the small company (approximately 100 employees), bustle with enthusiasm for the oil shale industry in general and Paraho in particu- lar. Paraho has doubled the number of employees in the past year, and if all goes as planned, could have 1,500-2,000 employ- ees by 1986. Those plans include a pro- posed commercial oil shale faciliry the Paraho-Ute project, 50 miles southeast of Vernal, UT, as well as continued expansion of the company's research and technology, including maintaining the facility at Anvil Points, near Rifle, CO. Back to the Poinb In fact, Paraho's history is firmly an- chored to Anvil Points, where the U.S. Navy holds shale lands known as Naval Re- serves One and Three. During the 1940s and 1950s, the federal government, primar- ily through the U.S. Bureau of Mines, con- ducted research on oil shale mining and processing at the site, and the knowledge gained in those years has served as a basis for much of the shale technology used today. John B. Jones, Jr., a chemical en- gineer, was one of the researchers who worked on the project and helped develop the Bureau of Mines retort, a vessel in which crushed shale is heated to remove the oil.
  • The American Energy Initiative, Part 17: a Focus on the Future of Energy Tech- Nology with an Emphasis on Canadian Oil Sands

    The American Energy Initiative, Part 17: a Focus on the Future of Energy Tech- Nology with an Emphasis on Canadian Oil Sands

    THE AMERICAN ENERGY INITIATIVE, PART 17: A FOCUS ON THE FUTURE OF ENERGY TECH- NOLOGY WITH AN EMPHASIS ON CANADIAN OIL SANDS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND POWER OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MARCH 20, 2012 Serial No. 112–128 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce energycommerce.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 77–480 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 10:55 Jan 23, 2013 Jkt 037690 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\114313~1\112-12~1 WAYNE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE FRED UPTON, Michigan Chairman JOE BARTON, Texas HENRY A. WAXMAN, California Chairman Emeritus Ranking Member CLIFF STEARNS, Florida JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky Chairman Emeritus JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York MARY BONO MACK, California FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey GREG WALDEN, Oregon BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois LEE TERRY, Nebraska ANNA G. ESHOO, California MIKE ROGERS, Michigan ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York SUE WILKINS MYRICK, North Carolina GENE GREEN, Texas Vice Chairman DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado JOHN SULLIVAN, Oklahoma LOIS CAPPS, California TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee CHARLES A. GONZALEZ, Texas BRIAN P.
  • A Preliminary Investigation of the Feasibility of Spent Oil Shale As Road Construction Material

    A Preliminary Investigation of the Feasibility of Spent Oil Shale As Road Construction Material

    A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THE FEASIBILITY OF SPENT OIL SHALE AS ROAD CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL Gerald J. Gromko, University of Colorado at Denver The use of spent oil shale material as aggregate for flexible pavement con­ struction was investigated, and its suitability for use both in base courses and in bituminous surface courses is discussed. To assess the aggregate and asphalt-aggregate characteristics of spent shale the following tests were performed: the Los Angeles abrasion test, the dry sieve analysis, the specific gravity test, the Atterberg limits test, and the Hveem method of mix design. The results of the testing showed that the spent shale aggregate was well-graded, flat, angular, highly absorbent, friable, and nonplastic, has a rough surface texture, and wears relatively easily. The aggregate mixes tested by the Hveem stabilometer yielded high strength values and were relatively lightweight. The asphalt-spent shale mixtures studied showed very high total resistance (combination of stability and cohesiometer values) values, i.e., more than adequate load-carrying capability. How­ ever, the asphalt contents necessary for these very high strengths were also high. Based on the results of the tests performed, it seems apparent that this particular type of spent shale material might perform very well in flexible pavement structures. Although the material showed more than ade­ quate strength and stability, it may not stand up as well to the abrasive action of traffic on high-capacity roads and may be expensive because of the seemingly large amountofasphalt needed. However, this mixture might perform very well as a surface course layer for lower capacity roads (e.g., secondary roads).
  • Pace Syntfletic Fne Its Report

    Pace Syntfletic Fne Its Report

    pace syntfletic fne its report OIL SHALE 0 COAL 0 OIL SANDS VOLUME 25 - NUMBER 4 - DECEMBER 1988 QUARTERLY Tsll Ertl Repository s Library ; Jhoi of M:cs ®THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. Reg. U.S. P.I. OFF. Pace Synthetic Fuels Report Is published by The Pace Consultants Inc., as a multi-client service and Is intended for the sole use of the clients or organizations affiliated with clients by virtue of a relationship equivalent to 51 percent or greater ownership. Pace Synthetic Fuels Report is protected by the copyright laws of the United States; reproduction of any part of the publication requires the express permission of The Pace Con- sultants Inc. The Pace Consultants Inc., has provided energy consulting and engineering services since 1955. The company's experience includes resource evalua- tion, process development and design, systems planning, marketing studies, licensor comparisons, environmental planning, and economic analysis. The Synthetic Fuels Analysis group prepares a variety of periodic and other reports analyzing developments in the energy field. THE PACE CONSULTANTS INC. SYNTHETIC FUELS ANALYSIS F V.1 I V1t'J 1 1 [tU :4i] j Jerry E. Sinor Pt Office Box 649 Niwot, Colorado 80544 (303) 652-2632 BUSINESS MANAGER Horace 0. Hobbs Jr. Post Office Box 53473 Houston, Texas 77052 (713) 669-7816 Telex: 77-4350 CONTENTS HIGHLIGIrFS A-i I. GENERAL CORPORATIONS Davy Buys Dravo Engineering 1-1 New Zealand Synfuels Plant May Sell Methanol i_I Tenneco Dismembers Its Oil and Gas Operations 1-1 GOVERNMENT Alternative Motor Fuels Act of 1988 Becomes Law 1-2 DOT Develops Alternative Fuels Initiative 1-2 U.S.
  • Legislative Hearing Committee on Natural Resources U.S

    Legislative Hearing Committee on Natural Resources U.S

    H.R.l: ‘‘AMERICAN-MADE ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE JOBS ACT’’; H.R.l: ‘‘ALASKAN ENERGY FOR AMERICAN JOBS ACT’’; H.R.l: ‘‘PROTECTING INVESTMENT IN OIL SHALE: THE NEXT GENERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ENERGY, AND RE- SOURCE SECURITY ACT’’ (PIONEERS ACT); AND H.R. l: COAL MINER EMPLOY- MENT AND DOMESTIC ENERGY INFRA- STRUCTURE PROTECTION ACT.’’ LEGISLATIVE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Friday, November 18, 2011 Serial No. 112-85 Printed for the use of the Committee on Natural Resources ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov or Committee address: http://naturalresources.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 71-539 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:06 Mar 12, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 L:\DOCS\71539.TXT Hresour1 PsN: KATHY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES DOC HASTINGS, WA, Chairman EDWARD J. MARKEY, MA, Ranking Democratic Member Don Young, AK Dale E. Kildee, MI John J. Duncan, Jr., TN Peter A. DeFazio, OR Louie Gohmert, TX Eni F.H. Faleomavaega, AS Rob Bishop, UT Frank Pallone, Jr., NJ Doug Lamborn, CO Grace F. Napolitano, CA Robert J. Wittman, VA Rush D. Holt, NJ Paul C. Broun, GA Rau´ l M. Grijalva, AZ John Fleming, LA Madeleine Z.
  • Oil Shale Development in the United States: Prospects and Policy Issues

    Oil Shale Development in the United States: Prospects and Policy Issues

    INFRASTRUCTURE, SAFETY, AND ENVIRONMENT THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as CHILD POLICY a public service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY organization providing objective analysis and POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY effective solutions that address the challenges facing SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY the public and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND Support RAND INFRASTRUCTURE Purchase this document WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Oil Shale Development in the United States Prospects and Policy Issues James T. Bartis, Tom LaTourrette, Lloyd Dixon, D.J. Peterson, Gary Cecchine Prepared for the National Energy Technology Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy The research described in this report was conducted within RAND Infrastructure, Safety, and Environment (ISE), a division of the RAND Corporation, for the National Energy Technology Laboratory of the U.S.
  • Chapter 2: Operations and Environment

    Chapter 2: Operations and Environment

    Chapter Two Operations and Environment Abstract Expanded natural gas and oil resources have resulting variation in environmental impacts and dramatically improved the North American energy issues. The main focus of this chapter is to con- supply outlook. However, prudent production and sider ways in which industry and government can delivery of these resources presents operational improve environmental performance, reduce risk, and environmental challenges. Technological engage with stakeholders, and develop and com- advances have made shale gas, tight oil, deepwater municate important information on environmen- offshore, oil sands, and other resources economi- tal impacts. cally recoverable. If these resources are to be avail- able and economic for development, continuous The outline of the Operations and Environment attention to reducing risks is essential to ensure chapter is as follows: pollution prevention, public safety and health, and y Introduction and Summary environmental protection. These outcomes are important in their own right, but also in order to y Resource Play Variations and Associated Envi- enjoy access to the resources for extraction and ulti- ronmental Challenges mate satisfaction of consumers’ energy demand. y History of Innovation in Environmental Stew- Given the importance of these issues, they have ardship strongly influenced the study process. y History of Natural Gas and Oil Environmental This chapter examines the major environmental Laws and safety issues that must be addressed in order to safely produce and deliver North American natural y Sustainable Strategies and Systems for the Con- gas and oil resources; examines the historical con- tinued Prudent Development of North American text of environmentally responsible development Natural Gas and Oil and improvements in technology, regulation, and y Offshore Safety and Environmental Management environmental management; and describes the variation in natural gas and oil resources and the y Key Findings and Policy Recommendations.
  • Annual Report 2018

    Annual Report 2018

    Annual report 2018 We contribute to making the world a cleaner place 1 Large-scale energy production 35 Cash flows 94 Contents Network services 42 Investment 97 Development projects 46 Financing 100 Eesti Energia at a glance 3 We protect the environment 49 Outlook for 2019 104 80 years of innovative Eesti Energia 7 Our people 55 Chairman’s letter 11 We give back to society 59 Eesti Energia Highlights of 2018 15 Tax footprint 64 consolidated Operating environment 17 Corporate governance 67 financial Strategy 24 Risk management 79 statements 106 Customer services Financial results 27 83 Income statement 108 Statement of comprehensive income 109 Statement of financial position 110 Statement of cash flows 111 Renewable energy Statement of changes in equity 112 Notes to the financial statements 113 31 Revenue and EBITDA 84 Electricity 85 Independent auditor’s report 195 Distribution service 88 Profit allocation proposal 203 Shale oil 90 Glossary 205 Other products and services 92 Investor information 206 Eesti Energia 106 million euros: at a glance NET PROFIT for 2018 2.5 billion euros: INVESTMENTS 4 in the last BUSINESS LINES: 10 years customer services, renewable energy, large-scale energy production, network services 875 Established million euros: REVENUE in 1939 for 2018 5,763 6 employees* HOME MARKETS: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Finland, Sweden 3 100% owner: REPUBLIC OF ESTONIA * number of employees at 31 December 2018. 8 5 6 7 2 3 9 1 4 4 BUSINESS LINES LARGE-SCALE ENERGY PRODUCTION: 1. Oil shale mines I 2. Thermal power plants I 3. Oil plants NETWORK SERVICES: 8.
  • Evaluation of New Applications of Oil Shale Ashes in Building Materials

    Evaluation of New Applications of Oil Shale Ashes in Building Materials

    minerals Article Evaluation of New Applications of Oil Shale Ashes in Building Materials Mustafa Cem Usta 1,*, Can Rüstü Yörük 1, Tiina Hain 2, Peeter Paaver 3, Ruben Snellings 4, Eduard Rozov 5, Andre Gregor 1, Rein Kuusik 1, Andres Trikkel 1 and Mai Uibu 1 1 Department of Materials and Environmental Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia; [email protected] (C.R.Y.); [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (R.K.); [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (M.U.) 2 Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia; [email protected] 3 Department of Geology, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia; [email protected] 4 Sustainable Materials, VITO, 2400 Mol, Belgium; [email protected] 5 Wienerberger, 43401 Aseri, Lääne-Virumaa, Estonia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 3 July 2020; Accepted: 27 August 2020; Published: 29 August 2020 Abstract: Achieving sustainable zero-waste and carbon neutral solutions that contribute to a circular economy is critically important for the long-term prosperity and continuity of traditional carbon-based energy industries. The Estonian oil shale (OS) sector is an example where such solutions are more than welcome. The combustion of OS generates a continuous flow of ashes destined to landfills. In this study, the technical feasibility of producing monolith building materials incorporating different OS ashes from Estonia was evaluated. Three binder systems were studied: self-cementation of the ashes, ceramic sintering in clay brick production and accelerated carbonation of OS ash (OSA) compacts.