Annual Report 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Magisterarbeit / Master's Thesis
MAGISTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Magisterarbeit / Title of the Master‘s Thesis Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Krisenkommunikation Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Flugzeugunglücks der Lufthansa-Tochter Germanwings am 24. März 2015 verfasst von / submitted by Raffaela ECKEL, Bakk. phil. angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, 2016 / Vienna, 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: A 066 841 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sabine Einwiller Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit an Eides statt, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Die aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommenen Gedanken sind als solche kenntlich ge- macht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form keiner anderen Prü- fungsbehörde vorgelegt und auch noch nicht veröffentlicht. Wien, August 2016 Raffaela Eckel Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einführung und Problemstellung ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Theoretische Hinführung: Beitrag der Wissenschaft zu einer gelungenen Krisenkommunikation.................................................................................................... 2 1.2 -
Lufthansa Micro Focus® Quality Center on Saas Delivers a Fresh Impetus for Application Testing at Lufthansa
Customer Success Story Application Delivery Management Lufthansa Micro Focus® Quality Center on SaaS delivers a fresh impetus for application testing at Lufthansa. Overview system. Each step of the process must work in Lufthansa ranks among the top ten airlines in the perfect harmony. First, the passenger’s iden- world in terms of size and is the second largest tity is verified; this data is then compared to European airline. From its Frankfurt and Munich that on the reservation system. This is followed At a Glance hubs, Lufthansa flies to 202 destinations in 78 by the seat reservation process, calculating air countries. Besides its passenger business, the miles in the Miles & More system, and mak- ■ Industry aviation group comprises divisions for cargo, ing adjustments in the catering system for any Aerospace & Defense aircraft maintenance, IT and catering. special requests. If a suitcase is checked in, it is weighed, assigned to the passenger, and then ■ Location Cologne, Germany Challenge sent on its way to the airplane via the airport’s conveyor system. Finally, the passenger re- Today, an airline passenger can check in for ■ Challenge their flight with just a couple of taps on a ceives their boarding card with all the relevant flight information. To provide departments with tools for software mobile phone, by pressing a few buttons at testing and test management without accruing the automatic check-in machine, or having a high internal costs for IT. short conversation with the staff at the check- Lufthansa’s check-in system has more than in desk. The airlines’ goal is for this to be a 160 interfaces to other IT systems; both to in- ■ Products and Services simple, pain-free experience for passengers; ternal systems and to the systems of external Secured Quality Center licenses in a such simplicity depends on a highly complex partners such as airports. -
246429 Master S Thesis___Ro
Link to Microsoft Excel-Model In order to gain a better understanding of the following analysis and valuation, it is recommended to consider the original excel model, which has been built in a self-explanatory manner and can be found via the following link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/csj7ii75mvzcng7/Valuation of LHA - Master Thesis.xlsx?dl=0 While the main findings and explanations can be found in the text, you are welcome to contact me via e-mail with any questions or if problems with opening the file occur: [email protected] _______________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract The ultimate goal of this report is to provide the marginal investor with a thorough strategic as well as financial analysis of Deutsche Lufthansa AG leading towards a recommendation whether to buy, sell or hold the company's stock on 30.12.2016. Included in this analysis is an assessment of the credibility of current rumors about Lufthansa's potential engagement in M&A activity with Air Berlin. As consolidation is generally anticipated within the European airline industry, an informed assessment of the rumors' credibility is of relevance for the marginal investor. The applied DCF-valuation model derives at an estimate of 18,41€ for Deutsche Lufthansa AG's fair share price. As the stock is trading for 12,27€ on the valuation date, this report suggests that the market undervalues Lufthansa's stock. The additional constructions of a best and worst case scenario provide a potential range of share prices resembling possible deviations in estimated future growth rates of ASKs, load factors, unit yields, fuel and staff costs. -
Key Data on Sustainability Within the Lufthansa Group Issue 2012 Www
Issue 2012 Balance Key data on sustainability within the Lufthansa Group www.lufthansa.com/responsibility You will fi nd further information on sustainability within the Lufthansa Group at: www.lufthansa.com/responsibility Order your copy of our Annual Report 2011 at: www.lufthansa.com/investor-relations The new Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental The new Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental is the advanced version of one of the world’s most successful commercial aircraft. In close cooperation with Lufthansa, Boeing has developed an aircraft that is optimized not only in terms of com- fort but also in all dimensions of climate and environmental responsibility. The fully redesigned wings, extensive use of weight-reducing materials and innova- tive engine technology ensure that this aircraft’s eco-effi ciency has again been improved signifi cantly in comparison with its predecessor: greater fuel effi - ciency, lower emissions and signifi cant noise reductions (also see page 27). The “Queen of the Skies,” as many Jumbo enthusiasts call the “Dash Eight,” offers an exceptional travel experience in all classes of service, especially in the exclusive First Class and the entirely new Business Class. In this way, environmental effi ciency and the highest levels of travel comfort are brought into harmony. Lufthansa has ordered 20 aircraft of this type. Editorial information Published by Deutsche Lufthansa AG Lufthansa Group Communications, FRA CI Senior Vice President: Klaus Walther Concept, text and editors Media Relations Lufthansa Group, FRA CI/G Director: Christoph Meier Bernhard Jung Claudia Walther in cooperation with various departments and Petra Menke Redaktionsbüro Design and production organic Marken-Kommunikation GmbH Copy deadline 18 May 2012 Photo credits Jens Görlich/MO CGI (cover, page 5, 7, 35, 85) SWISS (page 12) Brussels Airlines (page 13) Reto Hoffmann (page 24) AeroLogic (page 29) Fraport AG/Stefan Rebscher (page 43) Werner Hennies (page 44) Ulf Büschleb (page 68 top) Dr. -
Capital Markets Day 2019
Capital Markets Day 2019 24th June 2019 Frankfurt Agenda Capital Markets Day 2019 11.00 am – 11.05 am 12.30 am – 01.30 pm 02.35 pm – 03.00 pm Welcome by Dennis Weber, Lunch Presentation Ulrik Svensson, Head of Investor Relations Chief Financial Officer 01.30 pm – 02.10 pm 11.05 am – 11.55 am Presentation Thorsten Dirks, 03.00 pm – 04.00 pm Presentation Carsten Spohr, Chief Executive Officer Eurowings Q&A Chairman of the Executive Board & Chief Executive Officer 02.10 pm – 02.35 pm 04.00 pm – 06.30 pm Presentation Dr. Detlef Kayser, First-hand Product Experience, 11.55 am – 12.30 am Chief Officer Airline Resources Simulator Experience / Cabin Training / Presentation Harry Hohmeister, & Operations Standards Product Stands / Networking Chief Commercial Officer Network Airlines 06.30 pm End of event Capital Markets Day 2019 Group Strategy Carsten Spohr, Chairman of the Executive Board and CEO 24th June 2019 Frankfurt #1 for all stakeholders – committed to drive sustainably higher returns . ROCE doubled since 2014; further improvement through the cycle . Free Cash Flow to exceed EUR 1bn medium-term Shareholders . Dividend payout increased to 20% to 40% of net income #1 #THEREISNOBETTER Customers Employees #THEREISNOBETTER WAYTOFLY PLACETOWORK CMD 2019 Group Strategy Page 2 Lufthansa Group has become a structurally more profitable company 7to1 program Key achievements Adj. EBIT margin & Adj. ROCE started 2014 Customer centricity and quality focus Lufthansa: Europe’s first 5 Star Airline New concepts 14.2% for growth Eurowings: #3 P2P carrier in Europe ~ x2 Effective and lean organization Removal of an entire management level 7.9% Innovation and Digitalization of key operational and 7.1% digitalization customer processes Culture and Performance culture: 3.9% leadership Bonus 100% linked to financials Value based steering Doubling of Adj. -
Airline Alliances
AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State . -
2ND INTERIM REPORT JANUARY – JUNE 2018 1 Letter from the Executive Board
2ND INTERIM REPORT January – June 2018 All Lufthansa Group airlines achieve substantial growth in the first half of 2018 | Adjusted EBIT for the Lufthansa Group of EUR 1,008m only just below prior-year period despite substantially higher fuel costs | Full-year unit revenue projection raised and earnings forecast reaffirmed: Adjusted EBIT only slightly below previous year lufthansagroup.com lufthansagroup.com/investor-relations WorldReginfo - 45d53c5c-029f-4df2-9bf9-1174bd36a5c9 Lufthansa Group KEY FIGURES LUFTHANSA GROUP Jan – Jun Jan – Jun Change Apr – Jun Apr – Jun Change 2018 2017 in % 2018 2017 in % Revenue and result Total revenue in €m 16,938 16,951 – 0.1 9,298 9,260 0.4 of which traffic revenue in €m 13,156 13,293 – 1.0 7,371 7,485 – 1.5 Adjusted EBITDA in €m 1,906 1,889 0.9 1,435 1,443 – 0.6 Adjusted EBIT in €m 1,008 1,042 – 3.3 982 1,017 – 3.4 EBIT in €m 1,010 1,031 – 2.0 983 1,015 – 3.2 Net profit / loss in €m 677 672 0.7 734 740 – 0.8 Key balance sheet and cash flow statement figures Total assets in €m 39,258 37,901 3.6 – – Equity ratio % 25.0 19.4 5.6 pts – – Net indebtedness in €m 2,554 1,139 124.2 – – Pension provisions in €m 5,418 8,127 – 33.3 – – Cash flow from operating activities in €m 3,018 3,226 – 6.4 1,393 1,578 – 11.7 Capital expenditure (gross) 1) in €m 1,927 1,397 37.9 1,213 642 88.9 Free cash flow in €m 977 2,100 – 53.5 187 1,006 – 81.4 Key profitability and value creation figures Adjusted EBITDA margin % 11.3 11.1 0.2 pts 15.4 15.6 – 0.2 pts Adjusted EBIT margin % 6.0 6.1 – 0.1 pts 10.6 11.0 – 0.4 pts EBIT margin -
World Air Transport Statistics, Media Kit Edition 2021
Since 1949 + WATSWorld Air Transport Statistics 2021 NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/ or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Associ- ation shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Fur- thermore, the International Air Transport Asso- ciation expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. Opinions expressed in advertisements ap- pearing in this publication are the advertiser’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of IATA. The mention of specific companies or products in advertisement does not im- ply that they are endorsed or recommended by IATA in preference to others of a similar na- ture which are not mentioned or advertised. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or trans- mitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without the prior written permission from: Deputy Director General International Air Transport Association 33, Route de l’Aéroport 1215 Geneva 15 Airport Switzerland World Air Transport Statistics, Plus Edition 2021 ISBN 978-92-9264-350-8 © 2021 International Air Transport Association. -
Sustainability 2019 2 INTRO
FACT SHEET ONLINE lufthansagroup.com/en/responsibility FACT SHEET FACT Sustainability 2019 Sustainability 2 INTRO The responsible and sustainable treatment of resources, the environment and society is a prerequisite for the long-term financial stability and attractiveness of the Lufthansa Group for its customers, employees, investors and partners. With its measures and concepts, the Lufthansa Group aims to strengthen the positive effects of its business activities and further reduce the negative impacts in order to consolidate its position as a leading player in the airline industry, including in the area of corporate responsibility. You will find further information, the strategic direction and targets in the non-financial declaration of the annual report 2019. ↗ investor-relations.lufthansagroup.com The Executive Board has been extended to include a position responsible for Customer & Corporate Responsibility since 1 January 2020. This will establish responsibility for environment, climate and society directly at the Executive Board level. The Company has applied the principles of the UN Global Compact for sustainable and responsible corporate governance since 2002. A Supplier Code of Conduct has supplemented the Code of Conduct, which has been binding for all corporate bodies, managers and employees since 2017. The Lufthansa Group supports the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the Agenda 2030, as adopted by the UN member states in 2015 and is concentrating on the seven SDGs 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 13 and 17 due to the impacts of its business -
Star Alliance
Star Alliance Star Alliance is the world's largest global airline alliance.[2] Star Alliance Founded on 14 May 1997, its current CEO is Jeffrey Goh[4] and its headquarters is located in Frankfurt am Main, Germany.[3] As of April 2018, Star Alliance is the largest of the three global alliances by passenger count with 762.27 million, ahead of both SkyTeam (630 million) and Oneworld (528 million).[5][6] Its Launch date 14 May 1997 slogan is "The Way the Earth Connects". Full members 26 Star Alliance's 26 member airlines operate a fleet of approximately Non-voting members 40 affiliates 5,033 aircraft, serving more than 1,290 airports in 195 countries Pending members 0 on more than 19,000 daily departures. The alliance has a two-tier Destination airports 1,294[1] rewards program, Silver and Gold, with incentives including [2] priority boarding and upgrades. Like other airline alliances, Star Destination countries 195 Alliance airlines share airport terminals (known as co-location) Annual passengers (M) 762[2] and many member planes are painted in the alliance's livery. Annual RPK (G) 1,739[1] Fleet size 5,033[1] Contents Headquarters Frankfurt am Main, Germany[3] Management Jeffrey Goh, CEO[4] History Calin Rovinescu, Chairman 1997–1999: First alliance Alliance slogan The Way the Earth Connects. Additions 2000–2006: Expansion Website www.staralliance.com (http://w 2007: First decade ww.staralliance.com) 2008–2010: Second decade of operations 2011–present: further expansion and stability Member airlines and affiliates Members and affiliates -
Atmosfair Airline Index 2011
atmosfair Airline Index 2011 Copyright © atmosfair, Berlin 2011 How is the Airline Index used? - Even efficient flights can quickly exceed a single person’s climate appropriate CO budget 1. Avoidance 2 (see graphic). Is my flight necessary? - Have I chosen the most direct flight? (Rule of thumb: a direct flight in Efficiency Class E is better for the climate than a transfer flight in Class C) 2. Optimization - The airline index shows you the efficiency points of an airline broken down by short, medium and long distance flights. First, ascertain your flight distance and then, in the appropriate distance class, the most efficient airline. - The airline with the most efficiency points will generally also be the most efficient on your specific flight from point A to point B. Deviations are possible, but generally do not exceed one efficiency class. - atmosfair can offset the CO quantity that you generate with your flight by building up and 3. Compensation 2 expanding the generation of renewable energies. Make your contribution to fighting global warming online with the multiple test winner www.atmosfair.de Food, habitation, energy mobility C G C G C G Climate impact*: 100 kg CO2 210 kg CO2 360 kg CO2 1.600 kg CO2 2.000 kg CO2 850 kg CO2 1.450 kg CO2 1.600 kg CO2 2.600 kg CO2 1 year 1 passenger 1 year Personal 1 passenger 1 passenger operation of Distance 700 km car usage climate Distance 3.300 km Distance 6.550 km a fridge (e.g. Düsseldorf - Mailand) budget** (e.g. -
EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019
Ref. Ares(2021)636251 - 26/01/2021 Flight Standards Directorate Air Operations Department EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2018 to 31 December 2019) Air Operations Department TE.GEN.00400-006 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union Page 1 of 119 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2018 to 31 December 2019) Document ref. Status Date Contact name and address for enquiries: European Union Aviation Safety Agency Flight Standards Directorate Postfach 10 12 53 50452 Köln Germany [email protected] Information on EASA is available at: www.easa.europa.eu Report Distribution List: 1 European Commission, DG MOVE, E.4 2 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Participating States 3 EASA website Air Operations Department TE.GEN.00400-006 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union Page 2 of 119 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Table of Contents Executive summary ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction