Page 47 ITEM 9

ITEM 9

SURREY COUNTY COUNCIL

LOCAL COMMITTEE (GUILDFORD).

DATE: TUESDAY 13 DECEMBER 2016

LEAD KEVIN MCKEE, PARKING SERVICES MANAGER, GUILDFORD OFFICER: BOROUGH COUNCIL

SUBJECT: GUILDFORD ON-STREET PARKING REVIEW – CHANGES TO REVIEW PROCESS AND SCOPING REPORT

DIVISION(S): ALL

SUMMARY OF ISSUE:

This report presents recommendations for changing the way in which parking reviews are conducted and proposes the scope of the next review.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

The Local Committee (Guildford) is asked to agree:

(i) that reviews are combined and deal with issues both in the CPZ and non-CPZs areas,

(ii) that reviews are limited in scope to deal with around 50 items / locations, and prioritisation is given to safety issues,

(iii) that permit schemes or changes to them are considered if residents can demonstrate a groundswell of opinion clearly in support of such amendments,

(iv) that disabled bay, vehicle crossover and less controversial issues are fast-tracked, and formally advertised as early in the review process as possible,

(v) to formally advertise Surrey County Council’s intention to make an order to give effect to the proposals for Annandale Road, Duncan Drive, the Millmead Terrace area, The Oval and Vicarage Gate, shown in ANNEXE 5. If any representations are received they be reported to a future meeting of the Committee for consideration, or if no representations are received, the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) will be made.

(vi) to develop and formally advertise Surrey County Council’s intention to make an order to give effect to the proposals for, Alresford Road, Maori Road, St Omer Road, Sycamore Road, Upperton Road, Warren Road and Woodbridge Road, listed in Paragraph 2.15, If any representations are received they be reported to a future meeting of the Committee for consideration, or if no representations are received, the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) will be made.

www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 47 ITEM 9

(vii) that officers discuss further with local borough and county councillors the possibility of making changes in respect to the 40 or so ‘Local’ issues shown in ANNEXE 4, and develop proposals in a number of these locations, to be reported back to the Committee in March 2017, with a view to seeking authority to formally advertise them.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS:

To assist with safety, access, traffic movements, increase the availability of space and its prioritisation for various user-groups in various localities, and to make local improvements.

1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND:

1.1 To introduce or change a parking restriction Surrey County Council needs to follow a process set out in the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (as amended) to create a Traffic Regulation Order. This requires the formal advertising of a proposal and for any comments or objections received to be considered before the restriction is introduced. If a comment or objection is received that requires the proposal to be changed significantly, the proposal is likely to need to be advertised again. For more complex or controversial proposals, it is useful to either conduct informal consultation before formally advertising the proposal, or have information to show a proposal is likely to be supported.

1.2 The number of parking issues raised means that there is a need for them to be considered in an efficient manner and prioritised. Therefore, rather than dealing with issues as and when they arise, they are considered collectively as part of parking reviews. This allows the committee approvals, drafting of legal documents, consultations, formal public notices and procuring contractors to implement the outcome to be done for a number of locations at the same time rather than individually for each issue. It also ensures that the various issues raised are considered more consistently and can be prioritised appropriately.

1.3 In December 2004, the Committee agreed a cycle of reviews alternating between the Guildford town centre controlled parking zone (CPZ) and the areas elsewhere within the borough (non-CPZ). It was envisaged that each cycle would take 18 months to complete, with the implementation stage occurring during the last 6 months of the review. It was also anticipated that the last 6 months of one review would overlap with the first 6 months of the next review. Therefore, it was expected that a review would commence every year (see ANNEXE 1).

1.4 The reality has been somewhat different. The last review concerning issues within the CPZ was completed in August 2014. The most recent review, dealing with issues within the non-CPZ area was completed in November 2016.

1.5 On average, rather than taking around 18 months to complete, reviews have been taking two to two-and-a-half years to complete. Even so, the overlap between the reviews has tended to reduce the time between the start of one review and the next to around two years. Nevertheless, the practicalities of implementing one review whilst trying to progress the next has proved problematic. The commencement of a review has often raised expectations, www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 48 ITEM 9

only for us to be unable to progress them due to the implementation phase(s) of the previous review. As a result, concerns have been raised about the duration of reviews.

1.6 Currently, there are around 350 parking issues which have been raised. The latter figure is despite the most recent review in the non-CPZ areas dealing with issues in over 100 locations.

1.7 Because reviews currently cycle between CPZ and non-CPZ, this means that if we do not progress an issue within one review, it may be several years before we will be able to consider it again. Due to these timescales, there has been a tendency for reviews to become ‘overloaded’, resulting in them taking longer than the 18-months anticipated.

1.8 To ensure that the introduction of formalised disabled bays and new vehicle crossovers that conflict with formalised restrictions could take place as soon as possible in September 2009 the Committee agreed that the consideration of these items could be considered whenever other restrictions were being implemented. Nevertheless, because of the extended duration of the reviews, and the fact that the implementation has generally occurred in one or two phases towards their end, this can still result in delays in implementing these necessary changes.

1.9 One option is to combine both CPZ and non-CPZ areas and considering the merits of all issues throughout the borough during each review. This, and prioritising safety issues, would ensure that those issues most deserving of action are progressed in a timely fashion, and regardless of their geographic locality.

1.10 Another issue that has arisen regularly has been the ability to implement changes necessary to accommodate developments. Previously, these were ‘mopped-up’ as part of the parking reviews. However, the delays involved have often led to dissatisfaction from developers and those that subsequently occupy the developments. Because of this, since the beginning of the last review, Parking Services has agreed with Surrey County Council’s Transport Development Plans team that any changes to the formalised parking controls necessary to accommodate developments should form part of a planning agreement. This allows the changes to more closely coincide with the completion of the development. It also means that the costs associated with making the changes are borne by the developer.

1.11 Since the commencement of the last review, Surrey County Council (SCC) has reassessed the way in which it undertakes parking reviews elsewhere in the county.

1.12 To enable it to complete reviews more quickly, the County Council has decided to limit the scope of each review to dealing with issues in around 50 issues/locations. This is far fewer than the 110 locations Parking Services dealt with in its most recent review. Clearly, the need to consult and develop proposals in far fewer locations will help reduce the amount of time taken. However, it does mean that the Committee will need to be more selective about which issues it progresses. It also means that more issues are held over to the next review, albeit that the next review should occur sooner.

www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 49 ITEM 9

1.13 To focus its resources more efficiently, the County Council also decided that, prior to considering parking schemes, or significant changes to existing ones, residents / businesses would have to demonstrate a significant support of such changes before they are considered as part of a review. Previously, issues raised by a relatively small number of people have been pursued, and large amounts for time spent consulting, only to find that there was not general support. This approach also means that reviews are responding to the wishes of communities. It is also likely to reduce the need to undertake informal consultation for some of the major amendments, instead allowing us to proceed straight to formal advertisement.

1.14 The reviews that Parking Services has previously undertaken within the borough of Guildford have been similarly affected. This has resulted in a great deal of time and effort being spent on unproductive work. This, and the large number of issues considered, has caused the reviews to become longer in duration.

1.15 In terms of the level of support necessary to trigger our consideration of a major change, the County Council took the view that at least 70% support from all frontages. However, it also agreed that there maybe exceptions where lower levels would be appropriate. A Parking Scheme Request Form has been developed specifically for this purpose (see ANNEXE 3). This is already available for the public to use via the Guildford Borough Council website.

1.16 The County Council has also decided that issues where safety is the main consideration issues should take priority over those solely associated with the availability of space.

1.17 Whilst dealing with the major, and more contentious issues takes time, there are some issues, such as disabled bays, amendments to accommodate vehicle crossovers and more minor yellow line and parking bay changes, which are less likely to be controversial. In previous reviews, such issues have often resulted in no representations, but have had to wait until the implementation phase(s), towards the end of each review, before being introduced.

1.18 One option would be to separate these from the major / contentious elements of the review, so that authority to advertise is acquired at the beginning of the review, or nearer its start. Any issues that subsequently generated significant comment could then drop into the major / contentious element of the review. It would also allow less contentious issues that arose during the course of the review to be considered later in the review, alongside the major / contentious issues.

1.19 Creating a ‘fast-tack’ for necessary changes, non-contentious issues or changes where a significant level of support had been demonstrated could derive tangible benefits for those requesting the changes. However, care would have to be taken to ensure that the proposed two phases of implementation, more evenly spread out during the course of the review, do not increase to three, or more. This could have implication in respect to the benefits of the economies of scale, and ultimately have a detrimental impact on the cost and duration of the reviews.

2. ANALYSIS: www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 50 ITEM 9

2.1 Therefore, in respect to the review process, it is recommended the Committee agrees:

a. that reviews are combined and deal with issues both in the CPZ and non- CPZs areas,

b. that reviews are limited in scope to deal with around 50 items / locations, and prioritisation is given to safety issues,

c. that permit schemes and changes to them are considered if residents / businesses effected can demonstrate significant support of such amendments,

d. that disabled bay, vehicle crossover and less controversial issues are fast-tracked, and formally advertised as early in the review process as possible.

2.2 An outline of the recommended review process is shown in ANNEXE 2.

2.3 A list of the issues raised, predominantly in the CPZ areas, appears in ANNEXE 4. These have been put in road order, summarised into the nature of the request, and whether the issue is a ‘Local’ one, or involves ‘Area-wide’ considerations.

2.4 ‘Local’ issues involve the possibility of altering of one or two restrictions in a specific location.

2.5 ‘Area-wide’ requests tend to involve the amendment of controls over wider areas, or fundamental changes to the way that the controls / permit scheme operates.

2.6 Additionally, some of the issues raised have involved the submission of organised requests from significant groups within particular areas. These submissions tend to involve more substantial ‘Area-wide’ changes, rather than ‘Local’ issues, although they can be both.

2.7 Furthermore, a number of ‘Necessary’ changes are required to accommodate new disabled bay requests, new and revised vehicle crossovers, and new developments that pre-date the arrangement whereby the developer enters a planning agreement with Surrey County Council’s Transport Development Plans team.

Parking Scheme Request form submissions 2.8 A number of issues have been subject to organised requests from significant groups within the areas affected. These are:

a. Annandale Road

b. Duncan Drive

c. Millmead Terrace area (Bury St, Bury Fields, Lawn Rd, Millmead Tr)

d. The Oval

www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 51 ITEM 9

e. Vicarage Gate

2.9 Annandale Road – Residents from 7 of the 11 properties within the street have submitted a parking scheme request form suggested that parking associated with the school run of the nearby school, combined with the parking associated with the school’s sixth form students, causes availability of space issues for residents and their visitors. Parking Services is also aware of another resident of the road that did not sign the form that has similar concerns. All the bays in Annandale Road are currently shared-use allowing a maximum stay of 2 hours for those who do not have a permit. The request asks for the bays on the east side of the road to be converted to permit-holders only.

2.10 Duncan Drive - Residents have been complaining for a long time about cars parked on both sides of the road. This narrows the carriageway often making its width insufficient for emergency access. At a meeting attended by a local councillor and an officer, residents reiterated their widely held concerns about parking close to the junction with Boxgrove Lane, and on both sides of the road elsewhere within Duncan Drive. The request asks for parking to be prohibited at Duncan Drive’s junction with Boxgrove Lane, and on one side throughout the remainder of the road.

2.11 Millmead Terrace area - Residents have raised concerns about the availability of parking space outside the present operational hours of the prioritisation measures. It is suggested that these difficulties are caused by non-residents wishing to visit local destinations and avoid paying parking charges. There is overwhelming support within Millmead Terrace to increase prioritisation and extend the operational hours of the controls, including Sundays. A majority of respondents in Bury Fields and Bury Street are also supportive of some change, albeit not a clear majority of addresses. Although it may be possible to introduce localised measures in Millmead Terrace only, it may be more appropriate to amend the controls in the wider Bury Fields, Bury Street, Lawn Road and Millmead Terrace area. Doing so would make it possible to create of a distinct ‘zone’, in much the same way as we have previously done in the area around G-Live.

2.12 The Oval – Residents living between Nos.87 and 101 have raised concerns about the availability of space issues caused by non-residents and those who are able to work around the parking scheme without having to acquire a permit. Unlike most other properties in The Oval which have off-street parking, most of the properties concerned are wholly reliant on the availability of on- street parking. All the bays in The Oval are currently shared-use, allowing non-permit-holders the ability to park for up to 4 hours. The request asks for the first two parking spaces outside these properties to be converted to permit- holders only. The two bays outside Nos.87-101 would be the most appropriate.

2.13 Vicarage Gate – Resident have conducted a survey which shows that a significant majority of households would like the unrestricted parking bays in their road changed to prevent all-day parking by non-residents. Most residents have off-street parking but they would like to increase the availability for visitors, trades people and carers.

2.14 Therefore, it is recommended that the proposals shown in ANNEXE 5 are formally advertised.

www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 52 ITEM 9

‘Necessary’ changes 2.15 A number of the changes highlighted in ANNEXE 4 are ‘Necessary’ to accommodate new disabled bay requests, new and revised vehicle crossovers, and new developments that pre-date the arrangement whereby the developer enters a planning agreement with Surrey County Council’s Transport Development Plans team. In all cases, these ‘Necessary’ changes are also ‘Local’. These are:

 Alresford Road, Guildford (disabled bay request outside No.9),  Maori Road, Guildford (amendments to parking bays and single yellow lines in vicinity of Lanesborough School to accommodate changes to the vehicular access arrangements resulting from a development),  St Omer Road, Guildford (revisions to increase the setback distance from the lowered kerb to the parking bay outside No.17, following revisions to the extent of the lowered kerb),  Sycamore Road, Guildford (TECHNICALITY – a previous development at No.25 Recreation Road has resulted in a change to the parking controls in Sycamore Road, without the necessary amendment of the traffic regulation order been made),  Upperton Road, Guildford (disabled bay request in space closest to Guildford Park Road)  Warren Road, Guildford (change of catchment area boundary to transfer a number of properties in the Epsom Road-Austin Road section of the road from Area I to Area C)  Woodbridge Road, Guildford (removal of two pay and display only spaces to accommodate the vehicular access to the ‘pop up village’)

2.16 It is recommended that proposals for the locations listed above are developed and formally advertised.

‘Local’ issues 2.17 ANNEXE 4 identifies ‘Local’ issues, in addition to those referred to above as ‘Necessary’. With these localised requests for changes, we would not expect those proposing them to show they had support from other households because they only effect a limited area.

2.18 Therefore, it is recommended that officers discuss further with local borough and county councillors the possibility of making changes in respect to the ‘Local’ issues shown in ANNEXE 4, and develop proposals in a number of these. It is anticipated that the authority necessary to advertise the proposals subsequently developed as a result of these discussions will be sought at the March 2017 meeting of the Committee.

‘Area-wide’ issues 2.19 ANNEXE 4 also identifies over 100 individual requests for ‘Area-wide’ changes to the parking scheme. These requests relate to around 30 different ‘Area- wide’ issues in various localities.

www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 53 ITEM 9

2.20 ‘Area-wide’ issues raised include changes to the operational hours of the permit scheme, the prioritisation of spaces, and residents and visitors permit eligibility in various localities.

2.21 Because of this, in many cases, the ‘Area-wide’ issues raised may involve significant consultation. Conducting this, without any prior indication that there is actually significant support for change, could ultimately lead to a substantial amount of officer time being unproductive.

2.22 Therefore, in view of the above, it is recommended that the ‘Area-wide’ issues are not progressed until residents / businesses have demonstrated significant support for such amendments.

Size of the Proposed Review 2.22 Our recommendation for the forthcoming review is for it to include: (a) The five areas described in paragraphs 2.8 to 2.14, where residents have shown support for the proposed changes, (b) The seven ’Necessary’ changes described in paragraphs 2.15 and 2.16, and (c) The ‘Local’ issues highlighted in Annexe 4 of which there are around 40. Not all of these will result in proposals for change but they will all be considered.

2.23 This produces a review of around 50 items. It not possible to say exactly how long the issues will take to resolve because they involve consultation but we would estimate the review will take around 18 months.

3. OPTIONS:

3.1 The Committee needs to decide whether to adopt a review process that will hopefully speed up the reviews and address issues in a more timely fashion. Issues will primarily be progressed on the basis of need and the wishes of the communities in which they are situated.

3.2 The Committee also needs to decide whether to advertise the proposals as recommended, make changes, or not to progress some, or all of the proposals. After a proposal is advertised any comments or objections received would be circulated amongst local borough and county councillors before being reported to the Committee and a decision taken whether to implement the proposals, or implement less restrictive proposals. If there was a wish to increase the amount of restriction as a result of comments received, the proposals would have to be advertised again.

3.3 If the Committee agrees the recommendations (v) and (vi), the intention would be to report any subsequently received representations to the June 2017 meeting of the Committee. If it subsequently agrees to introduce controls, it is likely that the first phase of implementation will take place by the end of 2017.

3.4 If the Committee agrees the recommendation (vii), the intention would be to report the developed proposals to the March 2017 meeting of the Committee, seeking authority to advertise. If it subsequently agrees to advertise and introduce controls, it is likely that the second phase of implementation will take place by mid-2018.

www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 54 ITEM 9

3.5 The Committee could choose not to formally advertise the proposals. However, the issues that have been raised, and in many cases confirmed by the informal consultation, would remain unresolved.

4. CONSULTATIONS:

4.1 The list of issues contained within ANNEXE 4 has been circulated to relevant local borough and county councillors, and discussions held with a number of them about the scope of the review and the possible proposals.

4.2 Further discussions will be held with local borough and county councillors about the ‘Local’ issues to determine which can be progressed and result in the development of proposals.

5. FINANCIAL AND VALUE FOR MONEY IMPLICATIONS:

5.1 To undertake an appropriate level of consultation, create orders and implement changes to the signs and lines required to give affect to the proposals we estimate will cost no more than £50,000. If the Committee agrees to implement the proposals, the money will come from the Guildford on-street parking account.

5.2 Existing resources will be used to conduct the consultations and the only additional expenditure will be printing and postage. Although public exhibitions are not anticipated, if the need arises, where possible they will be held at Council facilities.

6. EQUALITIES AND DIVERSITY IMPLICATIONS:

6.1 Blue badge holders can park in disabled parking bays without time limit or on yellow lines, not subject to loading restrictions, for up to three hours and are exempt from charges for parking on-street. They can also park for an unlimited period in residents only, shared-use or limited waiting parking places.

7. LOCALISM:

7.1 The proposals will affect all road users in the areas where amendments are proposed and particularly residents. The proposals will be publicised, local residents and businesses written to directly and any comments received given careful consideration.

8. OTHER IMPLICATIONS:

Area assessed: Direct Implications: Crime and Disorder No significant implications arising www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 55 ITEM 9

from this report. Sustainability (including Climate Set out below. Change and Carbon Emissions) Corporate Parenting/Looked After No significant implications arising Children from this report. Safeguarding responsibilities for No significant implications arising vulnerable children and adults from this report. Public Health No significant implications arising from this report

Sustainability implications

8.1 Parking sits alongside Climate Change and Air Quality within the strategies that feed into the Surrey Transport Plan. Therefore, in many respects, these strategies and sustainability are inter-dependant.

8.2 Preventing parking in locations where it would otherwise cause safety and access issues, and in particular, impede traffic, helps reduce congestion, the resultant journey times and pollution. This can be particularly important on bus routes and where large vehicles utilise relatively narrow roads.

9. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

9.1 We recommend the Committee agrees:

(i) that reviews are combined and deal with issues both in the CPZ and non-CPZs areas,

(ii) that reviews are limited in scope to deal with around 50 items / locations, and prioritisation is given to safety issues,

(iii) that major schemes / changes are only considered if residents / businesses can demonstrate a groundswell of opinion clearly in support of such amendments,

(iv) that disabled bay, vehicle crossover and less controversial issues are fast-tracked, and formally advertised as early in the review process as possible,

www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 56 ITEM 9

the Committee for consideration, or if no representations are received, the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) will be made.

10. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT:

10.1 If the Committee agrees to advertise the proposals set out in recommendations (v) and (vi), it is likely that this will take place early in 2017, with a view to reporting any recommendations back to the June 2017 meeting. This would involve publishing a public notice, erecting street notices, placing documentation on deposit and writing to those in the immediate vicinity of the proposals. The feedback will be discussed with local borough and county councillors prior to presenting a report to the June 2017 meeting.

10.2 In respect to the ‘Local’ issues set out in recommendations (vii), further discussions will be held with local borough and county councillors, and where appropriate, proposals developed, with a view to reporting these back to the March 2017 meeting, seeking authority to formally advertise them.

Contact Officer: Andrew Harkin, On-street Parking Coordinator, Guildford Borough Council (01483) 444535

Consulted: Local Ward and Divisional Councillors

Annexes: 1 - Current parking review flowchart 2 - Proposed parking review flowchart 3 - Parking scheme request form 4 - List of requests received 5 - Proposals developed for Annandale Road, Duncan Drive, the Millmead Terrace area, The Oval and Vicarage Gate

Sources/background papers:  none

www.surreycc.gov.uk/Choose an item.

Page 57 This page is intentionally left blank FLOWCHART OF (ACTUAL) EXISTING REVIEW PROGRAMME

6 months 6 months 6 months 6 months 6 months 6 months 6 months

Review of CPZ including area of coverage, allocation of Review of areas outside CPZ permits, review of spaces, informal consultation

Design of Design of changes changes Report to Report to Committee Formal Committee Formal for decision consultation for decision consultation Report to Report to Committee Committee for decision for decision Implement Design of Implement Design of changes changes changes changes Settling‐in period Settling‐in period Report to Formal Committee Formal Report to consultation for decision consultation Committee Report to Report to for decision Committee Committee for decision for decision Implement Implement changes changes Settling‐in period Settling‐in period Page 59 Page ITEM 9 This page is intentionally left blank FLOWCHART OF PROPOSED REVIEW PROGRAMME

6 months 6 months 6 months 6 months

Review of 50 issues / items regardless of locality

Design of non‐ controversial changes

Report to Committee for decision Formal consultation Page 61 Page Report to Committee for decision Implement changes

Design of changes Report to Committee for decision Formal consultation

Report to ITEM 9 Committee for decision Implement changes This page is intentionally left blank PARKING SCHEME REQUEST TEMPLATE

When you have completed the template please send it to: Guildford Borough Council Parking Office, Laundry Road, Guildford, GU1 4PX, or you can email us a scanned copy to: [email protected]

Location details Street name(s) Specific location Main contact details Name Address including postcode Email address Phone number Description of problem

Description 63 Page of the parking problem (who, what, why, where, when etc). Attach plans, photographs and other documents as necessary. Statement of Request Please state what action you would like the council to consider taking in order to resolve the problem described above. Details of those who support the above statement House Post- Name Signature Street Email address (optional) number code 1 2 ITEM 9 3 4 5

Version 1 - Feb 2016 Page 1 of ___ PARKING SCHEME REQUEST TEMPLATE

Details of those who support the Statement of Request given on page 1 ITEM 9 House Post- Name Signature Street Email address (optional) number code 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 64 Page 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Version 1 - Feb 2016 Page ___ of ___ Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward Local ITEM 9 Need for greater Guildford SW prioritisation (Permit Availability of Resident / Friary & St A Area A in general Area-wide only and extended Space Nicolas control hours) Guildford SE Wants extension of & SW / Holy controls hours and Availability of Resident Trinity & A Area A in general Area-wide more spaces to be Space Friary & St made permit only. Nicolas Wants those who Guildford SE choose to rent & SW / Holy garages to have their Availability of Cllr Trinity & A Area A in general Area-wide eligibility for on-street Space Friary & St permits reduced Nicolas accordingly. Guildford SW complaints about Artillery Rd / Artillery Tr / Availability of Resident / Friary & St A near Boiler Room parking associated Area-wide George Rd Space Nicolas with venue. Wants residents from Guildford SW Artillery Rd / Artillery Tr / Area D to be Availability of Cllr / Friary & St A Area-wide George Rd prevented from Space Nicolas parking in Area A. Wants extended controls hours and Guildford SW restrictions on the Availability of Cllr / Friary & St A Artillery Road Area-wide number of skips Space Nicolas allowed in any one area. wants individual Guildford SW Access & spaces marked within Resident / Friary & St A Artillery Road Availability of Area-wide the bays and 'drop Nicolas Space off' bays provided. Wants a 24-hour Guildford SW scheme, more Availability of Resident / Friary & St A Artillery Terrace spaces, more permit Area-wide Space Nicolas only, and a ban on skips. Area in front of former garages (which have been Guildford SW adj. 1 Artillery Road converted to other Availability of Cllr / Friary & St A Artillery Terrace and 28 Church Local uses) can be Space Nicolas Road converted from SYL to a (single) parking bay. Guildford SW accessibility issues Resident via Area-wide / / Friary & St A Artillery Terrace for large vehicles Access Cllr Enforcement Nicolas servicing premises. lack of parking in Availability of Resident A Church Road evenings causes Area-wide Space issues. there are too many permits issued for the number of spaces Guildford SW provided, and Availability of Resident / Friary & St A Church Road Area-wide allowances should be Space Nicolas made when spaces are temporarily suspended.

Guildford SW want more restrictive Cllr / Friary & St A Church Road o/s No.41 controls than DYLs to Access Enforcement Nicolas prevent obstruction Want measures to Guildford SW prevent local Availability of Cllr / Friary & St A Dapdune Road businesses from Area-wide Space Nicolas 'playing the system' and shuffling cars. Availability of space issues, particularly in the evenings, appears to be caused by non-residents. Safety, Access Guildford SE / Inefficiently parked Resident A Eagle Road & Availability Area-wide Holy Trinity vehicles are also an of Space. issue. That coupled with the use of the road as a rat run, speeding casues various issues. Local Guildford SE / wants perpendicular (involving Resident A Falcon Road cul-de-sac end Access Holy Trinity bays widening engineering works) There is undoubtedly a parking problem in the area. Residents Guildford SE / using bays make it Availability of Resident A Falcon Road near No.44 Area-wide Holy Trinity difficult for those with Space carePage workers 65 and relatives that provide care. Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward ITEM 9 Local there is a severe Guildford SE / shortage of space at Availability of Resident A Falcon Road Area-wide Holy Trinity weekends and Space evenings. problems with Access & Guildford SE / obstruction due to Area-wide / Resident A Foxenden Road Availability of Holy Trinity lack of available of Enforcement Space space in evenings. has to park on yellow Access & Resident via Guildford SE / lines due to lack of A Foxenden Road Availability of Area-wide Cllr Holy Trinity availability of space Space in evenings. Wants stringent permit eligibility Guildford SW checks to ensure Availability of Cllr / Friary & St A Gardner Road permits are not being Area-wide Space Nicolas misacquired by those with o-ff-street parking. Guildford SW Wants individual Availability of Resident / Friary & St A Gardner Road spaces marked within Area-wide Space Nicolas the bays constantly find it difficult to park in the Guildford SW evening. Want more Availability of Resident / Friary & St A George Road spaces created, Area-wide Space Nicolas DYLs converted to SYLs and operational hours extended. lack of restrictions on Guildford SW Sundays means that Availability of Resident / Friary & St A Leas Road Area-wide anyone can park in Space Nicolas the bays. wants greater Guildford SW flexibility to acquire Resident / Friary & St A Markenfield Road more visitor permits, Access Area-wide Nicolas particularly for building works. opportunities to increase availability Guildford SW near Nettles of parking through Availability of Resident / Friary & St A Markenfield Road Local Terrace changes to existing Space Nicolas controls should be explored. Wants ability to Guildford SW acquire more visitor Resident / Friary & St A Markenfield Road Flexibility Area-wide permits, particularly Nicolas during building work. Can bays be extended to Guildford SE / Availability of Resident A Queens Road overcome the Local Holy Trinity Space availability of space issues. Wants operational hours of scheme Guildford SE / Availability of Resident A Queens Road extended to deal with Area-wide Holy Trinity Space issues caused by non- residents constantly find it Guildford SE / Availability of Resident A Springfield Road difficult to park in the Area-wide Holy Trinity Space evening. Wants extended control hours, more Guildford SE / permit only and Availability of Resident A Springfield Road Area-wide Holy Trinity restrictions on Space households with more than 2 vehicles. subdivision of properties has caused serious availability of space Guildford SE / issues in the evening. Availability of Resident A Victoria Road Area-wide Holy Trinity This is not helped by Space the controls finishing at 6pm and the impact of non- residents. Insufficient space in Guildford SE / Availability of Resident A Victoria Road evenings and at Area-wide Holy Trinity Space weekends need to Guildford SW Necessary to accommodate Methodist Church accommodate new Developer / Friary & St A Wharf Road Access Local development. Being dealt with by redevelopment access Nicolas SCC using S.278 arrangements Residents use shared- use spaces making it extremely difficult for bonafide visitors to Guildford SW find a space. Availability of Resident / Friary & St A William Road Additionally, the Space & Area-wide Nicolas limits on visitor Flexibility permits,Page particularly 66 when building work is required, causes issues. Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward Local ITEM 9 Wants residents Guildford SW permit only Availability of Resident / Friary & St B Denzil Road throughout through Area-wide Space Nicolas the removal of shared use Lack of parking in Guildford SW evenings causes Availability of Resident / Friary & St B Denzil Road issues. Wants SYLs Area-wide Space Nicolas and DYLs converted to spaces. parking on footway Guildford SW between Guildford outside control hours Safety & Resident / Friary & St B Farnham Road Park Road and Local of SYLs causes Access Nicolas Denzil Road issues. Guildford SW Lack of parking Availability of Resident / Friary & St B Farnham Road Local causes issues. Space Nicolas Wants greater permit flexibility to accommodate multicar households in location with little Guildford SW permit pressure and Resident B Guildford Park Avenue Flexibility Area-wide / Onslow where absent landlords retain the use of the garage associated with the address for their own use. Wants greater permit flexibility to Guildford SW accommodate Resident B Guildford Park Avenue Flexibility Area-wide / Onslow multicar households in location with little permit pressure Wants permits to be issued to vulnerable user-groups who do Resident via Guildford SW B Guildford Park Avenue not have access to a Flexibility Area-wide Cllr / Onslow garage due to the wishes of their landlord. parking by non- permit holders Guildford SW outside present Availability of Resident / Friary & St B Ludlow Road Area-wide operational hours of Space Nicolas scheme causes issues. Wants new Guildford SW development to be Access & Resident / Friary & St B Millmead Terrace area permit free and SYL Availability of Local Nicolas opposite his garage Space converted to DYL. Guildford SW Wants SYL opposite Resident / Friary & St B Millmead Terrace area opposite garages his garage converted Access Local Nicolas to DYL. Guildford SW Wants meeting to Availability of Cllr / Friary & St B Millmead Terrace area discuss issues with Area-wide Space Nicolas residents. Significant issues outside current controls hours of scheme, particularly Guildford SW in the evening and on Availability of Resident / Friary & St B Millmead Terrace area Area-wide Sundays, primarily Space Nicolas caused by new developments. Wants permit free developments. Significant issues outside current controls hours of Guildford SW scheme, particularly Availability of Resident / Friary & St B Millmead Terrace area Area-wide in the evening and on Space Nicolas Sundays. Also wants permit free developments. Town centre and church parking in evening causes issues. Skips Guildford SW associated with Availability of Resident / Friary & St B Millmead Terrace area refurb work are also Area-wide Space Nicolas an issue, as is the lack of individually marked spaces and other residents manipulation of this.

Page 67 Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward ITEM 9 Local Querying Bellair Apartments eligibility for permit given that they have Guildford garages. PETITION Residents' Availability of SW / Friary & B Millmead Terrace area RECEIVED Area-wide petition Petition Space St Nicolas indicating 81% of respondents from area surveyed want some form of change.

parking by non- permit holders Guildford SW outside present Availability of Resident / Friary & St B Rupert Road Area-wide operational hours of Space Nicolas scheme causes issues. Lack of parking outside the present control hours Guildford SW combined with the Availability & Resident / Friary & St B Testard Road area Area-wide number of permits Flexibility Nicolas issued and area boundaries cause issues. Guildford SW Bay on north side Availability of Necessary to accommodate Resident / Friary & St B Upperton Road nearest Guildford Disabled bay request Local Space disabled bay Nicolas Park Road Wants shared-use bay converted to a Guildford SW Availability of 24/7 permit only bay, Resident / Friary & St B/F The Mount o/s No.35 Space & Area-wide due to issues, Nicolas Flexibility particularly on Sundays. Wants the whole of The Mount to be in Guildford SW Availability of one Area, rather than Resident / Friary & St B/F The Mount o/s No.37 Space & Area-wide split between B and Nicolas Flexibility F, or for permits to be valid in both areas. Wants greater flexibility to Guildford SE / Resident C Addison Road accommodate the Flexibility Area-wide Holy Trinity needs of multicar households. The bus service, Access & Guildford SE / throughout and near those visiting the School - SCC Resident C Addison Road Availability of Holy Trinity school church and the RSOS space school cause issues. wants greater Guildford SE / prioritisation for Availability of School - SCC Resident C Addison Road near school Holy Trinity residents near Space RSOS school. Insufficient space particularly in the Guildford SE / Availability of Resident C Addison Road evenings. Wants Area-wide Holy Trinity space more limited permit eligibility. Lack of parking, particularly in the evenings and at Guildford SE / weekends, but Availability of Resident C Addison Road Area-wide Holy Trinity conversely, wants space more flexibility regarding visitor permits. not enough space, too many permits Guildford SE / issued cause issues, Availability of Resident C Addison Road area Area-wide Holy Trinity particularly outside Space the current operational hours. Lack of parking, Guildford SE / particularly in the Availability of Resident C Area C in general Area-wide Holy Trinity evenings and at space weekends. parking for prolonged Guildford SE / Availability of periods by vehicles, Resident Holy Trinity & C Clandon Road space & Area-wide including camper Christchurch Environmental vans, is an issue. Lack of parking, Guildford SE / particularly in the Availability of Resident C Cline Road Area-wide Holy Trinity evenings and at space weekends. Inconsiderate parking Guildford SE / St Catherines Park (just away from existing Safety & Resident C Local Holy Trinity outside CPZ) controls causing Access issues. Parking on in Guildford SE / St Lukes Square (just outside between Warren uncontrolledPage 68 section Safety & Resident C Local Holy Trinity CPZ) Road and 'square' on NE side causes Access issues Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward Local ITEM 9 Parking on in Guildford SE / St Lukes Square (just outside between Warren uncontrolled section Safety & Resident C Local Holy Trinity CPZ) Road and 'square' on NE side causes Access issues wants greater flexibility for multicar Guildford SE / Resident C Warren Road households to Flexibility Area-wide Holy Trinity acquire residents' permits Lack of parking, particularly in the Resident via Guildford SE / Availability of C Waterden Road evenings and at Area-wide MP Holy Trinity space weekends. Wants 24/7 scheme.

Need to amend Catchment Areas so infill developments, Availability of Necessary technical change to Guildford SE Resident C/I Warren Road such as No.1a and 2 Space & Local ensure resident can acquire / Holy Trinity Warren Road are Flexibility permits for most convenient area included in Area C rather than Area I

Wants more permit only and dual-use Guildford SE parking to reduce & SW / Holy need for adjacent Availability of Resident Trinity & D Area D in general Area-wide area permits Space Friary & St reducing availability Nicolas of space for Permit A residents. Guildford SE & SW / Holy On-street Pay by SCC Trinity & D Area D in general Flexibility Area-wide Phone Friary & St Nicolas

Increase prioritisation of spaces for Guildford SW residents and greater Availability of Resident / Friary & St D Bedford Road area Area-wide flexibility for those in Space Nicolas private developments to acquire permits.

Wants greater flexibility to acquire Area D permits as there are capacity issues in Area H, and spare capacity in roads such as Availability of Guildford SE / Resident D Brodie Road Pewley Hill and Space & Area-wide Holy Trinity Harvey Road. Flexibility Additionally, there is scope to create additional spaces in Pewley Hill and Semaphore Road (Area H). Wants SYL outside their home converted Guildford SE / Availability of Resident D Brodie Road o/s No.21 to a bay exclusively Local Holy Trinity Space available for their use only. Wants greater Guildford SE / flexibility for visitor Resident D Brodie Road Flexibility Area-wide Holy Trinity permits, particularly for building works. Wants existing DYLs Guildford SE / access between bolstered to prevent Resident D Castle Street Access Local Holy Trinity Nos.38&39 loading and unloading. Wants existing DYLs to extend into Guildford SE / o/s access to 'notional bellmouth' to Resident D Chapel Street Access Local Holy Trinity Nos.55&56 make presence of access more obvious. Should be greater flexibility to acquire Area D permits as Guildford SW there is spare Availability of Resident / Friary & St D College Road Area-wide capacity in roads Space Nicolas such as College Road and often not in Area A. Wants greater flexibility to acquire Guildford SE / Resident D Dene Road more visitor permits, Flexibility Area-wide Holy Trinity and for them to be cheaper.

Page 69 Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward ITEM 9 Local Wants 8.30am-9pm SYL restrictions to be more clearly marked, Guildford SE / or controls relating to Availability of Resident D Dene Road Local Holy Trinity SYLs reduced to Mon-Space Sat 8.30am-6pm, like the others within the CPZ. Guildford SE / Wants restrictions Non-resident D Dene Road Clarity Local Holy Trinity made more obvious Wants 8.30am-9pm SYL restrictions to be more clearly marked, Guildford SE / or controls relating to Availability of Resident D Dene Road Local Holy Trinity SYLs reduced to Mon-Space Sat 8.30am-6pm, like the others within the CPZ. Want DYLs throughout as parking Guildford SE / between Jenner and Safety & Resident D Epsom Road on SYLs in this Local Holy Trinity Hunter Roads Access section still causes issues. Wants SYL opposite Guildford SE / Safety & Resident D Epsom Road opp. No.43 converted to DYL to Local Holy Trinity Access prevent parking

The impact of parking associated with the Glive extends beyond Guildford SE / the Dene Road area, Availability of Resident D Hunter Road Area-wide Holy Trinity and reduces the Space availability of space for those living in the wider area. Wants SYLs in vicinity converted to Guildford SE / near access to Safety & Resident D Jenner Road DYLs to resolve Local Holy Trinity Turret House Access issues caused by parking on SYLs. Wants loading Guildford SW restriction removed Business / Friary & St D Leapale Road o/s Pub Access Local or transferred to Nicolas opposite side of road

General lack of space particularly Guildford SW when projects are Availability of Resident / Friary & St D Martyr Road Area-wide ongoing in the area, Space Nicolas which is often in a town centre location.

Wants greater flexibility for permits, removal of the threshold and the ability for permits to be issued to two Guildford SW vehicles within Area Availability of Resident / Friary & St D Martyr Road D on first moving to Space & Area-wide Nicolas the area. To Flexibility accommodate this, wants all pay & display only bays made dual-use, or more made permit only. Guildford SW Wants P&D only Availability of Resident / Friary & St D Martyr Road Local bays made dual-use Space Nicolas Lack of parking particularly at weekends and Guildford SW outside the present Availability of Resident / Friary & St D Martyr Road control hours of the Area-wide Space Nicolas scheme. Wants all spaces in vicinity to be permit holders only. Lack of parking particularly at Guildford SW weekends and Availability of Resident / Friary & St D Martyr Road Area-wide outside the present Space Nicolas control hours of the scheme. Lack of parking particularly on Sundays. Wants Guildford SW consideration to Availability of Resident / Friary & St D Martyr Road Area-wide allow residents to use Space Nicolas Page 70 off-street public car parks on Sundays, as well as evenings. Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward Local ITEM 9 Lack of parking particularly at Guildford SW weekends and Availability of Resident / Friary & St D Martyr Road Area-wide outside the present Space Nicolas control hours of the scheme. Wants greater flexibility to acquire Area D permits as Area H is too distant Availability of Guildford SE / and unsafe after Resident D Oxford Road area Space & Area-wide Holy Trinity dark, and there is Flexibility spare capacity in roads such as Pewley Hill and Harvey Road. Due to availability of space issues caused by non-residents, wants evening and Safety, Access Guildford SE / Sunday controls Resident D Oxford Road area & Availability Area-wide Holy Trinity introduced, to of Space prioritise space and resolve inconsiderate parking on yellow lines. Concerns about impact of 14 unit Guildford SE / Graham House Availability of Cllr D Pannells Court residential Local Holy Trinity development Space development within Area D. parking on SYLs outside present Guildford SE / Resident D Pewley Hill o/s No.7 control hours causes Access Local Holy Trinity issues. Convert to DYLs. Wants setback to bay Guildford SE / SE of VCO extending Resident D South Hill o/s No.8 Access Local Holy Trinity beyond normal 1-2 kerbs. Wants greater flexibility to acquire Area D, particularly Availability of Guildford SE / Resident D Sydenham Road when the off-street Space & Area-wide Holy Trinity parking at an address Flexibility does not meet current standards.

Should be greater flexibility to acquire Area D permits as Guildford SE / Area H is too distant, Resident D Tunsgate Square area Flexibility Area-wide Holy Trinity and there is spare capacity in roads such as Pewley Hill and Harvey Road. remove P&D bays Guildford GBC to facilitate access. necessary to accommodate SW / Friary & D Woodbridge Road pop up village Access Local Engineers Candidate for SCC development St Nicolas TTRO? parking by non- permit holders in Guildford SE / Availability of Resident D York Road area evening and at Area-wide Holy Trinity Space weekends causes issues. wants spaces Guildford SE / Yvonne Arnaud access road Availability of Resident D disabled bays formalised to prevent Local Holy Trinity (GBC private) space misuse wants permit only spaces to accommodate D/H Availability of Guildford SE / Resident D/H Semaphore Road permit holders, or Space & Area-wide Holy Trinity increased flexibility to Flexibility acquire permits in Area D Wants SYL opposite Guildford SW driveway converted Resident / Friary & St E Josephs Road opp. No.26 Access Local to DYL to improve Nicolas access. wants permit only Guildford SW near Enterprise controls in nearby Availability of Resident / Friary & St E Josephs Road Local Rent A Car bays to prevent Space Nicolas misuse by Enterprise.

misuse of private Guildford SW Josephs Road / Springside near Enterprise spaces by Enterprise, Availability of Resident / Friary & St E Local Court (private spaces) Rent A Car as well as those in Space Nicolas Page 71 Josephs Road Guildford SW Resident via Langley Close (just outside wants allocated Availability of / Friary & St E Area-wide MP CPZ) parking for residents Space Nicolas Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward ITEM 9 Local Guildford SW wants spaced Safety, Access Housing Langley Close (just outside / Friary & St E marked out and & Availability Area-wide Association CPZ) Nicolas controls introduced. of Space. Guildford SW GBC Refuse Langley Close (just outside occasional / Friary & St E Access Area-wide & Recycling CPZ) accessibility issues Nicolas wants spaces marked out and Guildford SW Safety, Access Langley Close (just outside controls introduced to Resident / Friary & St E & Availability Area-wide CPZ) resolve various Nicolas of Space. inconsiderate parking issues. parking across access an issue, Guildford SW junction with particularly that Resident / Friary & St E Linden Road Recreation Road associated with fast- Access Local Nicolas and to Rear of No.5 food outlets in the area. Wants DYLs to bolster deterrent. Guildford SE / parking associated near Guildford High Safety & School - SCC Resident Holy Trinity & E Nightingale Road with school run School for Girls Access RSOS Christchurch causes issues. use of Rec. on Friday Guildford SW afternoons and on Availability of Resident / Friary & St E Recreation Road Area-wide weekends cause Space Nicolas issues. continuing issues Guildford SW associated with fast- Safety, Access Resident via near junction with / Friary & St E Recreation Road food outlets at the & Availability Enforcement Police Woodbridge Road Nicolas junction of of Space. Woodbridge Road parking outside Guildford SW present control hours Availability of Resident / Friary & St E Recreation Road an issue, particularly Area-wide Space Nicolas as it is caused by non- residents wants residents' Guildford SW motorcycles to be Resident / Friary & St E Recreation Road Flexibility Area-wide exempt from the Nicolas permit scheme. Guildford SW parking associated Resident via near Woodbridge Safety & / Friary & St E Recreation Road with fast-food outlets Enforcement Cllr Road Access Nicolas causes issues.

Guildford SW parking associated near Woodbridge Safety & Resident / Friary & St E Recreation Road with fast-food outlets Enforcement Road Access Nicolas causes issues. Guildford SW Wants individual Availability of Resident / Friary & St E Stocton Road spaces marked within Area-wide Space Nicolas the bays parking associated Guildford SW Safety, Access with Rec. (Sunday Resident / Friary & St E Stocton Road & Availability Area-wide morning football) Nicolas of Space. causes issues. Wants greater ability Guildford SW for multi-car Resident / Friary & St E Stocton Road households to Flexibility Area-wide Nicolas acquire more residents' permits. Wants greater permit flexibility (already have one permit Guildford SW irrespective) and the Access & Area-wide / Resident / Friary & St E Stoke Road (service road) opp. No.133 parking bay opposite Flexibility Local Nicolas his driveway removed to improve access. Off-street parking Technicality / Guildford SW has been created Parking to rear of No.25 Amend TRO necessary to accommodate / Friary & St E Sycamore Road and parking bay Local Enforcement Recreation Road to match in- recent development Nicolas altered without situ authorisation

shuffling of cars by 6th form students and visitors to Farnham Road hospital causes Guildford Residents' issues. Want Availability of SW / Friary & F Annandale Road Local Petition Petition greater Space St Nicolas prioritisation of spaces (permit only and extended hours). PETITION RECEIVED

shuffling of cars by Guildford SW 6th form students Availability of Resident / Friary & St F Annandale Road causes issues. Want Local Space Nicolas somePage of spaces 72 to be permit only. Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward Local ITEM 9 shuffling of cars by Guildford SW 6th form students Availability of Resident / Friary & St F Annandale Road causes issues. Want Local Space Nicolas greater prioritisation of spaces. Guildford SW Want all spaces in Availability of Resident / Friary & St F Bray Road cul-de-sac section to Local Space Nicolas be permit only. wants greater prioritisation for Guildford SW permit holders to Availability of Resident / Friary & St F Bray Road Local deter visitors to Space Nicolas hospital parking on- street Permit only spaces should be made Guildford SW shared-use and / or Availability of Area-wide / Cllrs / Friary & St F Mountside 'upper' section greater flexibility Space & Local Nicolas given to acquiring Flexibility additional residents' permits. Guildford SW Wants greater Availability of Resident / Friary & St F Mountside 'upper' section flexibility to acquire Area-wide Space Nicolas residents' permits. Guildford SW Parking bay opposite Cllr / Friary & St F Nethermount opp. No.3 driveway causes Access Local Nicolas access issues Wants greater permit flexibility to Guildford SW accommodate Resident F Poltimore Road Flexibility Area-wide / Onslow multicar households in location with little permit pressure Want more flexible permit eligibility to take into account Resident via Guildford SW F Sandalwood temporary situations Flexibility Area-wide Cllrs / Onslow such as pregnancy and having young children. Wants greater permit flexibility to Guildford SW accommodate Resident F Sandalwood Flexibility Area-wide / Onslow households whose garages, whilst useable, are tight. Possible Guildford SW development will Would most likely be dealt with Developer / Friary & St G Chestnut Avenue require changes to Access Local by SCC TDP using S.278 Nicolas the formalised controls. wants bays closest Portsmouth Road Guildford SW section nearest made permit only and Availability of Resident / Friary & St G Chestnut Avenue Local Portsmouth Road individual spaces Space Nicolas marked within shorter bays.

Wants restrictions Guildford SW removing directly Availability of Resident / Friary & St G Devon Bank o/s No.4 outside property to Area-wide Space Nicolas allow parking across own driveway. Wants Ferry Lane to become its own Guildford SW Availability of Resident G Ferry Lane distinct zone, Area-wide / Shalford Space residents' only and possibly even P&D Wants measures to prevent residents Guildford SW Resident via with vans and / Friary & St G Guildown Road Environmental Area-wide Cllr camper vans from Nicolas being able to park them on-street. Wants private road to be eligible for on- Guildford SE / Resident H Chantry Quarry (private) street residents' and Flexibility Area-wide Holy Trinity visitor parking permits. Wants private road to be eligible for on- Guildford SE / Resident H Chantry Quarry (private) street residents' and Flexibility Area-wide Holy Trinity visitor parking permits. Wants private road to be eligible for on- Resident via Guildford SE / H Chantry Quarry (private) street residents' and Flexibility Area-wide MP Holy Trinity visitor parking permits. Wants private road to bePage eligible for73 on- Guildford SE / Cllr H Chantry Quarry (private) street residents' and Flexibility Area-wide Holy Trinity visitor parking permits. Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward ITEM 9 Local suggests revised parking arrangements Resident via Guildford SE / near Chantry Safety & H Chantry View Road associated with Local Cllr Holy Trinity Quarry Access Chantry Quarry development are unsafe. received reports suggesting revised parking Residents via Guildford SE / near Chantry arrangements Safety & H Chantry View Road Local Cllr Holy Trinity Quarry associated with Access Chantry Quarry development are unsafe. suggests revised parking arrangements Guildford SE / near Chantry Safety & Resident H Chantry View Road associated with Local Holy Trinity Quarry Access Chantry Quarry development are unsafe. suggests revised parking arrangements Guildford SE / near Chantry Safety & Resident H Chantry View Road associated with Local Holy Trinity Quarry Access Chantry Quarry development are unsafe. suggests revised parking arrangements Guildford SE / near Chantry Safety & Resident H Chantry View Road associated with Local Holy Trinity Quarry Access Chantry Quarry development are unsafe. suggests revised parking arrangements Guildford SE / near Chantry Safety & Cllr H Chantry View Road associated with Local Holy Trinity Quarry Access Chantry Quarry development are unsafe. suggests revised parking arrangements Resident via Guildford SE / near Chantry Safety & H Chantry View Road associated with Local MD Holy Trinity Quarry Access Chantry Quarry development are unsafe. Wants additional spaces to be created Guildford SE / New VCOs o/s to compensate for Availability of Resident H Pewley Hill Local Holy Trinity Nos.50/52 loss of parking Space associated with developments.

Wants additional spaces to be created Guildford SE / New VCOs o/s to compensate for Availability of Resident H Pewley Hill Local Holy Trinity Nos.50/52 loss of parking Space associated with developments.

wants additional Resident via Guildford SE / spaces to be created Availability of School - SCC H Pewley Hill near school MP Holy Trinity to accommodate the Space RSOS school run.

wants permits to park in nearby car parks Guildford SE / Availability of School - SCC Resident H Semaphore Road near school and prioritisation for Holy Trinity Space RSOS school parents over residents. wants greater prioritisation for Resident via Guildford SE / school parents and Availability of School - SCC H Semaphore Road near school MP Holy Trinity creation of more Space RSOS spaces for parents of pupils. position of parking Guildford SE / Safety & Resident H Tilehouse Road bay close to driveway Local Holy Trinity Access causes issues. Wants greater prioritisation for Guildford SE / Availability of Resident H Warwicks Bench permit holders or Area-wide Holy Trinity Space ability to acquire a permit for Area D present 2-kerb Guildford SE / setback distance to Safety & Resident I Aldersey Road near No.14 Local Christchurch adjacent bays is Access insufficient. WantsPage measures 74 to Resident via Guildford SE / I Aldersey Road prevent parking by Environmental Area-wide Cllr Christchurch camper vans Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward Local ITEM 9 Significant between Aldersey inconsistencies Guildford SE / Technicality / SCC I Cranley Road Road and Hillier between TRO and Local Christchurch Accuracy Road what is in-situ due to SCC works. parking on present SYLs associated with nursery and at other near Mathon Lodge Guildford SE / times causes issues, Safety & Resident I Cross Lanes / Court and during Local Christchurch particularly during Access school run school runs. Wants DYLs to increase deterrent effect. parking on both Residents sides and close to via Cllr Guildford SE Boxgrove Lane Duncan Drive (just outside Safety & including / I junction causes Local residents' meeting CPZ) Access residents' Christchurch issues particularly meeting in evenings and at weekends. Wants greater flexibility for organisations to Guildford SE / acquire business / Resident I Epsom Road Flexibility Area-wide Christchurch operational permits to allow them to park close to their place of work. Safety, Access Guildford SE / Lancaster Avenue area (just inconsiderate parking Resident I & Availability Area-wide Holy Trinity outside CPZ) causes issues. of Space some residents have been threatening Guildford SE / Lancaster Avenue area (just Availability of School I towards pupils, even Area-wide Holy Trinity outside CPZ) Space when they park sensibly. Property Inconsiderate parking Guildford SE / Linfield Gardens (just outside Availability of management I and lack of parking Area-wide Christchurch CPZ) Space company causing issues.

non-resident parking Guildford SE / causes issues for Availability of Resident I Lower Edgeborough Road near No.18 Local Holy Trinity residents that rely on Space on-street parking.

need for tighter permit eligibility and/or greater Guildford SE / Availability of Resident I Lower Edgeborough Road near Sheldon Court prioritisation of space Local Holy Trinity Space to meet residents' needs. Permit only and more spaces. Possible Guildford SE redevelopment Developer / I Maori Road o/s Nos.12-14 Access Local requiring changes Christchurch to controls. Guildford SE Redevelopment Necessary to accommodate Developer / I Maori Road o/s Nos.12-14 requiring changes Access Local development Christchurch to controls. parking in evenings Safety, Access Guildford SE / and weekends Resident I Rosetrees (just outside CPZ) & Availability Area-wide Holy Trinity particularly of Space problematic. VCO has been extend bring it to within one kerb of Guildford SE / parking bay. Wants Necessary to accommodate Resident I St Omer Road near No.17 Access Local Christchurch parking bay revised VCO readjusted to maintain two-kerb setback. wants unrestricted bays converted to time limited bays to Availability of Guildford SE / reduce all day Resident I Tormead Road near No.7 Space & Local Christchurch parking and increase Flexibility their availability to residents and their visitors.

non-permit-holding Availability of Guildford SE / residents abusing the Resident I Tormead Road cul-de-sac Space & Local Christchurch system and using the Flexibility unrestricted bays. Resident via Guildford SE / near bend with One parking close to bend Safety & Surrey I Warren Road Local Holy Trinity Tree Hill causes issues Access Advertiser present 2-kerb Guildford SE / setback distance to Safety & Resident I Warren Road Local Holy Trinity adjacentPage bays 75 is Access insufficient. Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward ITEM 9 Local parking close to bend causes issues, both within existing Guildford SE / near bend with One Safety & Resident I Warren Road parking bays and Local Holy Trinity Tree Hill Access beyond CPZ in uncontrolled sections. Now wants Resident via Guildford SW previously requested Availability of Necessary to accommodate J Alresford Road No.9 Local MP / Onslow disabled bay Space disabled bay progressed. Wants measures to Resident via Guildford SW J Alresford Road prevent parking by Environmental Area-wide Cllr / Onslow camper vans Possible creation of Resident via Guildford SW hardstand / VCO may GBC J Alresford Road No.9 Access Local / Onslow require changes to Engineers controls Wants consistency and feels that it is unfair that residents in the Onslow Village Guildford SW extension have the Resident J Area J - Onslow Village Area-wide / Onslow flexibility to park without needing a permit whilst those elsewhere within Area J do. Guildford SW Review of Availability of Cllr J Area J - Onslow Village Area-wide / Onslow Unrestricted bays Space Removing Saturday Availability of Guildford SW Cllr J Area J - Onslow Village controls from Onslow Space & Area-wide / Onslow Village Flexibility Small extension to Guildford SW Availability of Cllr J Area J - Onslow Village the CPZ required in Area-wide / Onslow Space Manor Way. Wants bay nearest Guildford SW The Chase removed Safety & Resident J Elmside o/s Nos.54-56 Local / Onslow to improve safety and Access reduce congestion. Wants bay nearest Guildford SW Old Palace Road Safety & Resident J Elmside o/s No.4 Local / Onslow removed to improve Access safety. Wants bay removed Guildford SW Safety & Resident J Elmside opp. No.32 entirely or curtailed to Local / Onslow Access improve access. Degree of prioritsation is Guildford SW unnecessary as there Non-resident J Friars Gate Flexibility Area-wide / Onslow is always a significant excess of space to vehicles. Possible curtailment Availability of Resident via Guildford SW High View Road (just outside J o/s Nos.27-28 of DYLs near Space & Local Cllr / Onslow CPZ) junction. Flexibility Wants bay o/s Nos.4- 6 converted to permit Resident via Guildford SW Availability of J Litchfield Way o/s Nos.4-6 only, along with all Area-wide Cllr / Onslow Space those in the E-W section of the road.

Although it may be against the wishes of Guildford SW Manor Way (just outside east of Abbots the residents there, Safety & Resident J Area-wide / Onslow CPZ) Close wants the CPZ to Access extend to the junction with Abbots Close. Cyclist continue to meet motorists coming the other way Guildford SW Manor Way (just outside east of Abbots Safety & Resident J in the section where Area-wide / Onslow CPZ) Close Access unbroken lengths of parking are still permitted. Wants allocated spaces as non-permit Guildford SW Availability of Resident J Old Court Road holders regularly Area-wide / Onslow Space occupy all spaces in the evenings. Wants carriageway reengineered and / or Guildford SW Availability of Resident J The Oval o/s Nos.87-99 bays converted from Local / Onslow Space shared-use to permit only. Introduction of permit Guildford SW Availability of Cllr J The Oval o/s Nos.87-99 only or shorter limited Local / Onslow Space waiting period Page 76 Parking Restrictions - Requests for New and Changes to Existing in Town Centre CPZ Areas

Division / Area-wide / Originator CPZ Area Road Location Issue / Request Reason Given Outcome Ward Local ITEM 9

Wants carriageway reengineered and / or bays converted Residents' Guildford from shared-use to Availability of J The Oval o/s Nos.87-99 Local Petition Petition SW / Onslow permit only. Space PETITION RECEIVED: various signatories

Wants the bay outside Williams Guildford SW Safety & Cllr J The Square made parallel and the Local / Onslow Access one adjacent to the post box removed. Wants measures to Guildford SW Resident J Vicarage Gate prevent long term Area-wide / Onslow parking. wants restrictions Guildford SW Safety & Resident J Wilderness Road junction with A3 extended to kerbline Local / Onslow Access of A3 Wants unrestricted Guildford SW Safety & Cllr J Wilderness Road bays to become time Area-wide / Onslow Access limited Wants a new town centre zone, permit only throughout Artillery Road / Church Road / Guildford SW George Road area, Availability of Cllr / Friary & St Various Various Area-wide and greater flexibility Space Nicolas for residents in the area around the town centre to park in the Borough Council's car parks.

Need to make public Guildford SW our intention to Availability of Cllr / Friary & St Various Various Area-wide reorganise the town Space Nicolas centre permit zones.

Key Petition / Residents' meeting Necessary change to accommodate development / vehicle crossover / disabled space

Page 77 This page is intentionally left blank 2 ITEM 9

A G R A

R 1 I A

R Hillier House O A D m .80

a 6 5

1 M B

58.3m

AD RO AM NH AR 69 F

65.1m

9 4 . 2 66 a

4 4 4

y A 6 Bd N ard N W A nd D a R N E C D A L E

R Guildford County School O Convert Surgery A D 2 hours limited waiting

1 1

5 0 no return within 1 hour Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm or Permit holders F parking places to

A Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm N N Tennis Court A Permit holders only F N D A parking places L E

R O A D

UE 7 EN 5 AV ND

0 ELA 8 8

WOD

8 LB 1

8 5

8 84 9

Key to Existing Restriction Types Displayed

No Waiting At Any Time

No Waiting Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm

Limited Waiting 2 Hours No Return Within 1 E Hour Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm or Permit B U Holders N E N V Permit F EHolders Only Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm A T D H 3 N Limited WaitingE 2 Hours No Return Within 1 A L Hour Mon-SatR 8.30am-6pm or Permit F Surgery E Holders M D O Tennis Courts O 1

W 9 2 5 N T

Guildford parking review - DRAWING No. GBC/APH/AnnandaleRdProp

Proposed changes DRAWN BY ANDREW HARKIN PageAnnandale 79 Road, Guildford V ITEM 9 A M A

H p

G o IN r

N P

N e

U v i

Y C r A

W D

Y 2 n I

E a

N K D c

2 R

R u

G A

2 /1 1 /2016 1 : 1000 @ A4

B G

N I

W W

A A

R A R

D D D S

T N 16 E C S E R C D O O W G IN LL 1 O C

T N E C S E 2 R C D O O W G

IN hanges - LL O C Posts

N Proposed c

T D R

N Duncan Drive, Guildford

E A Guildford parking review

1 E

2 V I

U D

lines

6 Introduce 1 No Waiting At Any Time

double yellow

s t Pos

1 1

11 E

I 2 R

U D

13 1

AD O R VE O R G 2 X 1 PageBO 80 BM 59.33m

Sub Sta m

E TR 8 04m H S 32. HIG R ITEM 9 1 31.7m BM i a 2 v 14 4 PH e r

Saint Nicolas' W

Church e

BU y 1 14 R Y

E 16 7 s o a ET 5 t 1 i e 13 t s to 7 t r Convert 11 1 o u u 6 a o 1 4 H M 8 2 hours limited waiting 18 to 9 1 1 18 0 no return within 1 hour 14

15 0 3 Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm 2 PH M 22 21 LB IL 3 Sherborne 1 L 2 or Permit holdersM B

E Court 3 A T D N parkingHays place to a U O Convert M House 0 2 hours limited waiting E 3 o D H t No Waiting

T 4 A

2 5

3 O no return within 1 hour 5 R Mon-Sat H L A o (Mon-Sun) 8.30am-9pm T l v m

8.30am-6pm e

3 U

s j 9 o O h y or Permit holders B o '

M single yellow u s

3 s 7 S T e parking place s R 1 linelines to to a 1

1 to 40 O

4 5 P Mount No Waiting Court 8.30am-9pm single yellow 9 D A O T 8 lines line EE R R ST El H Y

B R

i T U 1 Sub Sta s B 5 Convert h U 39.8m o C p O o s West t C Westnye ta M Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm r ge o S Bury ft Gardens T Court R Permit holders only B 0 2 O

M P

Mountwest House O 3 parking place to a

U N 1 to 40 2

T 5 Freshcliffe (Mon-Sun) 8.30am-9pm

T P Bishops House East

N L 8 to 1 U E A s O Court Permit holders only B S g M A n F N i E Hall r T e ld i s 1 parking place

TH 1 u H h t o 1 c B o W l 7 u i to f e s f f T e e E e 2 2 7 if E s

l R t

T 5

c 1

S t

to y o

2 Y 6 R U B 8 W B Convert u

r 6 y

1 No WaitingM

e 0

h w 4 c 2 Bee 1 e Mon-Sats us M Ho I

2 L

M 8.30am-6pm

3 E

1 4

o A

4 9 W D single yellow

e T s E M t R line to a I

M R Guildford L 1 0 L

o Horncastle A 2 u C No Waiting Baptist Church M E

n E

7 C

1 t Convert

A o

t o

4 At Any Time (Millmead Centre) BM D 1 n 1

d t 2 hours limited waitingo

o 3

2 r 4 1 double yellow

2 . C 9 8 no return within 1 hour 5 o PH

m u line

2 PH

2 r

1 t

9 Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm 2

0 6 1

8 or Permit holders B

3 45.4m

6 parking place to a

Mount (Mon-Sun) 8.30am-9pm Pleasant 5 Cottage Permit holders only B

parking place The Court Bow

6 M Cottage 3

3 l

B l

3 5 m 1

3 Convert 2 U

2 e 9 R

0 a

Y 2

7 d

3 Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm

5 2 8 F

1 I C

1 E t o o Y L E

Permit holders0 only B L

Convert D u

1 L 3 3 A S r t T

parking places to P Riverview 1 Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm 5 E G Lodge ID S (Mon-Sun) 8.30am-9pm R a Permit7 holders only B R y O T 1 4 e P 1 u r s n Permit holders only B n parking places to

e l parking places (Mon-Sun) 8.30am-9pm M FS

48.2m I

2 L 3 L Permit holders only B M

E Convert 1

A 7 parking places D y

4 le l

9 2 hours limited waiting T A 4 t E 5 o P R Convert e g R d no return within 1 hour ri A r o Millmead C 2 hours limited waiting P Convert E Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm House no return withinBury Field 1House hour No Waiting LB or Permit holders B Mon-Sat Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm parking places to El Sub Sta Convert 8.30am-6pm or Permit holders B 2 hours limited waiting Air Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm El Sub Sta

Shaft P parking places to a single yellow 2 no return within 1 hour O 3 Mead Pp Ho Permit holders only B R (Mon-Sun)S 8.30am-9pmCottage a line to a T (Mon-Sun) 8.30am-9pm C i

S n parking places to 7 h

M t 2 Permit holders only B u No Waiting N or Permit holders B O r c i (Mon-Sun) 8.30am-9pm c U h parkingo places

T 8 l parking places 8.30am-9pm H 1 a H Permit holders only B a s l ' single yellow R l O parking places

St Nicolas' A E Council line D RAC AD TER

C of E MILLME 5 Offices

1 Primary School Council Offices B Guildford

Hall M

4 United Reformed Convert

4 8 2Church hours limited waiting m

P no return within 1 hour Convert No Waiting Convert O

R Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm 1 to 24 61 T Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm 2 hours limited waiting S ry M or Permit holders B single yellowSouthb ulines to no return within 1 hour Key to Existing Restriction Types Displayed O Sta l Sub S Clinic Rookwood U E 18 23 parking places16 to21 D T No Waiting 8.30am-9pm Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm 5 L 10 1 20 2 2 H 14 E Court 2 I 1 9 (Mon-Sun)11 1 8.30am-9pmrt F 7 R 1 r Cou single yellow lines or Permit holders B 13 ce Y Car Club Permit Holders Only O hau C R

A Permit holders only B U parking place to

D B

2 Clinic

No Waiting Att Any Time parking places

o 2 hours limited waiting

3 2

4 2

2 9 7 r 9 Chauce no return within 1 hour No Waiting Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm Court LB ROAD

5 WN

3 LA (Mon-Sun) 8.30am-9pm No Waiting At Any Time/No Loading At Any 1 1 or Permit holders B Time AD parking place WN RO

No Waiting At Any Time/No Loading Mon-Sat LA 8.30am-6pm 8

48.4m 5

o Pay At Machine Display Ticket, Maximum

1 Stay 2 Hours Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm R O Rivermead O Convert Permit B Holders Only Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pmK 1 W

O R

2 hours limited waiting 3 The Rectory O e 2 c

D t Limited Waiting 2 Hours No Return Within 1 o r C y no return within 1 hour

O P Hour Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm or Permit B 2 l

U a

8 c 2 R e

Holders Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm

o T t

2 2 a or Permit holders B R O Permit F Holders Only Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm O parking places to K

W O Disabled Badge Holders Only 2 hours limited waiting O

C no return within 1 hour O

R 1 (Mon-Sun) 8.30am-9pm

o a

t 4 T 0 1

6 9 or Permit holders B 2 3 to 6

7 parking places 9 Dunford

Guildford parking review - DRAWING No. GBC/APH/MillmeadProp Proposed changes Page 81 Millmead area, Guildford DRAWN BY ANDREW HARKIN ITEM4 9 Key to Existing Restriction Types Displayed

No Waiting At Any Time 8 No Waiting Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm

Limited Waiting 4 Hours No Return Within 1 3 Hour Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm or Permit J

Holders

E CLOS 8 NDORP REI ILL

o 4

4 G A T

S 2 65 57.9m

7 7 T

5 L 4 VA O THE O V

6 1

9 2

Guildford Park

8 7 Playing Field

T Convert

O 4 hours limited waiting

53.8m A L no return within 1 hour 28 Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm or Permit holders J 58.7m parking places to Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm Playground Permit holders only J

parking places

2 7

9 6 o t

53.4m 4

6 5 m 1 3 .2 4 5 M B

1 to 70

Dray Cou 21 22

19 27 20 TH 28 E C HA SE AL THE OV PA LM

ODGE R 1 L 3 'S ' LMER S PA LO D 11 G TCB E 12 S

Reproduced from Ordnance Survey Material. HMSO Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. SCALE 1 : 1000 @ A4 Guildford Borough Council Licence No. 100019625, 2016 DATE 22/11/2016 Guildford parking review - DRAWING No. GBC/APH/TheOvalProp

Proposed changes DRAWN BY ANDREW HARKIN Page 82The Oval, Guildford 1

3 ITEM 9

30 1 1

D A O R AY S GEW Hall R HED All Saints' E T S I Church N N

A B 1

2 2 9

D R OAD

8 1

1 7

E T A G

E G A R A Convert IC V

Free unrestricted

1 parking places to 7 4 hours limited waiting no return within 1 hour Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm or Permit holders J parking places

3 4 A V G IN L R U C 2

E T A G

E G

A 1 R A 77.3m C I 2 Y V 0 A W

D L E I F H C T I 2 L 2

BM 80.3 14 5m 10 12 Key to Existing Restriction Types Displayed

No Waiting At Any Time LITCHF IELD WAY No Waiting Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm

5 Free Parking Places With Waiting Permitted 5 For Any Period Without Time Limit

Permit J Holders Only M-S 8.30am-6pm

Limited Waiting 4 Hours No Return Within 1 Hour Mon-Sat 8.30am-6pm or Permit J Holders

Disabled Badge Holders Only3 6

5 D 2

1 L

Guildford parking review - DRAWING No. GBC/APH/VicarageGateProp Proposed changes DRAWN BY ANDREW HARKIN PageVicarage 83 Gate, Guildford This page is intentionally left blank