Direct Bus Feasibility Study August 2021 I Contents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lancaster Avenue, Is One of an Extensive Inventory of Existing Conditions Data the Region’S Most Critical Transportation Corridors
executive summary DECEMBER 2011 The Delaware Valley Regional Planning The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official Commission is dedicated to uniting DVRPC seal and is designed as a stylized image of the region’s elected officials, planning the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the professionals, and the public with a region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies common vision of making a great the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents region even greater. Shaping the way represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and we live, work, and play, DVRPC builds the State of New Jersey. consensus on improving transportation, promoting smart growth, protecting DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding the environment, and enhancing the sources including federal grants from the U.S. economy. We serve a diverse region of Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Montgomery, and Philadelphia in Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC’s state and local member governments. DVRPC is the federally designated The authors, however, are solely responsible for Metropolitan Planning Organization the findings and conclusions herein, which may for the Greater Philadelphia Region — not represent the official views or policies of the leading the way to a better future. funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC’s website (www.dvrpc.org) may be translated into multiple languages. -
59Th Street Over Amtrak Bridge Replacement Project Fact Sheet December 2020
59th Street Over Amtrak Bridge Replacement Project Fact Sheet December 2020 Project Summary Site Map The 59th Street Bridge was built in the 1920s and provides 59th Street Bridge a connection between the Wynnefield and Overbrook neighborhoods in West Philadelphia, crossing over the Amtrak and SEPTA regional rail lines. To ensure its safety, the City will replace the bridge with a structurally sound and visually pleasing bridge that meets the needs of all transportation users (motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists). The bridge will also be constructed in a way that minimizes disruption to bridge users and the surrounding communities. 59th Street Bridge Bridge Background • 310 feet long, 70 feet wide • Two lanes in both directions, bike lanes on both sides, and 8-foot wide sidewalks on both sides • Used by pedestrians, cyclists, drivers, and SEPTA buses • North of the bridge are many community facilities, churches, and schools. To the south are Overbrook High School, Tustin Playground, and Lancaster Avenue (U.S. 30), a busy commercial and transportation corridor. Fairmount Park is within a mile to the east. What To Expect Overbrook Station (SEPTA Regional Rail) is within a • The bridge will mile to the west. remain open to pedestrians throughout the project. • Traffic detours for cars, trucks, and buses will Planned Improvements be necessary during construction. • Design and construction of new bridge with reinforced • Community meetings will be held in each concrete deck, abutments, and piers phase of design, beginning in December 2020. • Demolition and removal of existing bridge Due to COVID-19, the first meeting will be held • Roadway reconstruction and repaving using a digital platform. -
Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1
Roosevelt Boulevard Section 1 – Appendix 1 Previous Studies Review March 2016 This page intentionally left blank Task 1.C Review of Previous Studies Roosevelt Boulevard Route for Change Program TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................... i City of Philadelphia Plans 1. Philadelphia 2035 Citywide Vision (2011, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) .............. 1 Study Purpose and Highlights ........................................................................................................ 1 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 2 Public Involvement Process ...........................................................................................................11 Relevance to Route for Change Program ......................................................................................11 2. Lower Northeast District Plan (2012, Philadelphia City Planning Commission) ................... 15 Study Purpose and Highlights ...................................................................................................... 15 Plan Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 16 Frankford Transportation Center ............................................................................................. 17 Frankford Gateway ................................................................................................................. -
900-04 N 63Rd St, Overbrook Gardens Apartments OVERVIEW
COMMENT ON NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION ADDRESS: 900-04 N 63rd St, Overbrook Gardens Apartments OVERVIEW: The Pennsylvania Historical & Museum Commission (PHMC) has requested comments from the Philadelphia Historical Commission on the National Register nomination of 900-04 N 63rd Street, located in the Overbrook neighborhood of West Philadelphia and historically known as the Overbrook Garden Apartments. PHMC is charged with implementing federal historic preservation regulations in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, including overseeing the National Register of Historic Places in the state. PHMC reviews all such nominations before forwarding them to the National Park Service for action. As part of the process, PHMC must solicit comments on every National Register nomination from the appropriate local government. The Philadelphia Historical Commission speaks on behalf of the City of Philadelphia in historic preservation matters including the review of National Register nominations. Under federal regulation, the local government not only must provide comments, but must also provide a forum for public comment on nominations. Such a forum is provided during the Philadelphia Historical Commission’s meetings. According to the nomination, Overbrook Garden Apartments is significant in the Area of Community Planning and Development, as a prime example of the large, efficiency apartment building that became a highly desirable form of housing in West Philadelphia during the 1920s. The building is also significant in the Area of Architecture as an important example of the Spanish Colonial Revival style in Philadelphia and representative of a courtyard-type apartment building, a building form that became prevalent in West Philadelphia during the 1920s. The Period of Significance begins in 1928 when construction completed, and ends in 1930 when construction in West Philadelphia slowed due to Great Depression and interest in the Spanish Colonial Revival style waned. -
Fiscal Year 2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) As Adopted by the DVRPC Board on January 28, 2021
FISCAL YEAR 2022 čõţÕÑ|òččõčë ¥Ĕİă|İĔëİ²Č JUNE 2021 | 56 YEARS OF SERVICE SERVING THE PHILADELPHIA, CAMDEN, TRENTON, METROPOLITAN AREAS IntroductionIntroduction | 2 FY 2022 čõţÕÑ|òččõčë ¥Ĕİă|İĔëİ²Č DVRPC MEMBER GOVERNMENTS COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA STATE OF NEW JERSEY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR’S POLICY OFFICE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS BUCKS COUNTY BURLINGTON COUNTY CHESTER COUNTY CAMDEN COUNTY DELAWARE COUNTY GLOUCESTER COUNTY MONTGOMERY COUNTY MERCER COUNTY CITY OF CHESTER 190 N INDEPENDENCE MALL WEST CITY OF CAMDEN 8TH FLOOR PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1520 CITY OF PHILADELPHIA 215.592.1800 | FAX: 215.592.9125 CITY OF TRENTON WWW.DVRPC.ORG January 28, 2021 On behalf of the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC), we are pleased to present the Fiscal Year 2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) as adopted by the DVRPC Board on January 28, 2021. This document details work to be completed by DVRPC and our member governments during FY 2022, which runs from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. As the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater Philadelphia Area, DVRPC has the responsibility to undertake a performance-based planning and programming approach to making investments in our transportation system. DVRPC achieves this approach by following the direction and guidance provided by the FAST (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation) Act and the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), as well as undertaking the region’s priority planning initiatives. The planning activities identified in the FY2020 UPWP allow DVRPC to address a variety of issues in our diverse region. -
Philadelphia Zoo to Paoli Transmission Line Project Page | I
Environmental Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation March 2017 Environmental Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation March 2017 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (ES) .................................................................................................................. v ES – Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................. v ES – Alternatives Analysis ....................................................................................................................... v ES – Affected Environment ..................................................................................................................... vi ES – Environmental Impacts ................................................................................................................... vii ES – Agency Coordination and Public Involvement ................................................................................ x ES – Section 4(f) ...................................................................................................................................... xi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................... -
Cultural History of Narberth – Unabridged
CULTURAL HISTORY OF NARBERTH – UNABRIDGED A CULTURAL HISTORY OF NARBERTH BY VICTORIA DONOHOE Typed posthumously (and lightly edited) from manuscripts found among the author’s possessions by neighbor and friend, Nancy A Greene (02/01/2021) CULTURAL HISTORY OF NARBERTH – UNABRIDGED A CULTURAL HISTORY OF NARBERTH BY VICTORIA DONOHOE TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface Page Introduction i Chapter 1 – Before the Town 1 Chapter 2 – Abrasive Changes in the 1870s – The Founding of the Town (1876-1895) 60 Chapter 3 – Physical Development and Sections of Narberth (1895-1920) 130 Chapter 4 – Progressive Narberth – The Shaping of a Community (1895-1920) 197 Chapter 5 – Narbrook Park – “Garden City Experiment” 257 Chapter 6 – Narberth between World Wars (roughly 1920-1945) 301 Chapter 7 – Ethnic Makeup, Divisions, Different Social Groups 360 Chapter 8 – Narberth Lives 403 Chapter 9 – 1945-1975 447 Chapter 10 – 1975-1995 482 About the Author 562 Note from Editor 567 Acknowledgements 570 This page intentionally left blank. Preface This cultural history of Narberth was written by Victoria Donohoe, a lifelong resident of Narberth. It was written over a forty-year period from about 1980 until her death in 2018. Victoria did not complete the book but left it in manuscript form in her house. Neighbor and friend Nancy Greene, who had helped type chapters for Victoria in the last years of her life, was able to secure Victoria's writings (and supporting documentation) when Victoria was moved into a retirement home. Victoria died before the book could be completed but Nancy has typed and organized the material as closely as possible to the way she believes Victoria would have wanted it. -
Alternatives to Business on I-76: SEPTA Rail Feeder Bus Study
Alternative, to lu,e, on 1·76: SEPTA Rail reedel lUI Study Technical memorandum April 2009 The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is dedicated to uniting the region's elected officials, planning professionals and the public with a common vision of making a great region even greater. Shaping the way we live, work and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, promoting smart growth, protecting the environment and enhancing the economy. We serve a diverse region of nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater Philadelphia Region - leading the way to a better future. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC's state and local member governments. This report was primarily funded by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. -
Table of Contents Addendum to the Environmental Assessment
Addendum to the Environmental Assessment for the I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project November 2011 Addendum to the Environmental Assessment for the I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project DRJTBC Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A TABLE OF CONTENTS ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... i List of Figures .............................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv List of Appendices ......................................................................................................... v Errata to the 2009 Environmental Assessment/Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation ........................ vi Summary ................................................................................................................... vii I. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 A. Purpose of this Document ................................................................................... 1 B. Recent Project History ........................................................................................ 1 C. Proposed Action ................................................................................................. 2 D. Need for Tolling ................................................................................................ -
Warminster Linepublictimetable Layout12/27/201512:16Pmpage
Warminster LinePublicTimetable_Layout12/27/201512:16PMPage SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS and MAJOR HOLIDAYS FareServices Train Number 401 499 403 405 407 411 415 419 423 427 431 435 439 443 447 451 455 459 463 467 471 475 Zone Ê*ËStations AM AM AM AM AM AM AM AMAM AM AM PMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPMPM 3 DDWarminster — — — — 5:41 6:41 7:41 8:41 9:41 10:41 11:41 12:41 1:41 2:41 3:41 4:41 5:41 6:41 7:41 8:41 9:41 — 3 D Hatboro — — — — 5:45 6:45 7:45 8:45 9:45 10:45 11:45 12:45 1:45 2:45 3:45 4:45 5:45 6:45 7:45 8:45 9:45 — 3 D Willow Grove — — — — 5:49 6:49 7:49 8:49 9:49 10:49 11:49 12:49 1:49 2:49 3:49 4:49 5:49 6:49 7:49 8:49 9:49 — 3 DDCrestmont — — — — F5:51 F6:51 F7:51 F8:51 F9:51 F10:51 F11:51 F12:51 F1:51 F2:51 F3:51 F4:51 F5:51 F6:51 F7:51 D8:51 D9:51 — 3 DDRoslyn — — — — 5:53 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:53 10:53 11:53 12:53 1:53 2:53 3:53 4:53 5:53 6:53 7:53 8:53 9:53 — 3 DDArdsley — — — — 5:56 6:56 7:56 8:56 9:56 10:56 11:56 12:56 1:56 2:56 3:56 4:56 5:56 6:56 7:56 8:56 9:56 — 3 D Glenside — 4:29 4:59 5:29 5:59 6:59 7:59 8:59 9:59 10:59 11:59 12:59 1:59 2:59 3:59 4:59 5:59 6:59 7:59 8:59 9:59 10:59 3 DD Jenkintown-Wyncote — 4:31 5:01 5:31 6:01 7:01 8:01 9:01 10:01 11:01 12:01 1:01 2:01 3:01 4:01 5:01 6:01 7:01 8:01 9:01 10:01 11:01 2 D Elkins Park — 4:33 5:03 5:33 6:03 7:03 8:03 9:03 10:03 11:03 12:03 1:03 2:03 3:03 4:03 5:03 6:03 7:03 8:03 9:03 10:03 11:03 2 DDMelrose Park — 4:35 5:05 5:35 6:05 7:05 8:05 9:05 10:05 11:05 12:05 1:05 2:05 3:05 4:05 5:05 6:05 7:05 8:05 9:05 10:05 11:05 1 DDFern Rock T.C. -
State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development Regional Results of the Survey and Public Feedback From
State Transportation Commission 2015 Twelve Year Program Development Regional results of the survey and public feedback from August thru November 2013 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) Version 01-2014 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission MPO Total Visitors 730 Mobility Concerns Traffic congestion is growing and resources are limited to build additional capacity. As a result, transportation agencies are exploring ways to manage demand, operate efficiently, and improve capacity. Using a scale of 1-5, for each mobility concern, please rank how important each mobility concern is to you, with one being ‘Not Important’ and 5 being ‘Very Important’. Passenger Ridership on the Keystone Corridor has doubled since 2000 making it !mtrak’s fourth-busiest route in the Rail nation. Rail infrastructure improvements are critical to timely service. Responded With an Average Rank of 4.35 Congestion Relieve traffic congestion by addressing bottlenecks and other traffic relief measures. Responded With an Average Rank of 4.26 Transit Implementing new technologies improves service. Responded With an Average Rank of 4.15 Signals Modernization of traffic signals streamlines traffic flow and reduces fuel costs for motorists. Responded With an Average Rank of 4.07 Incident This legislation would allow for the safe, quick clearance of traffic incidents from the roadway. Responded With an Average Rank of 3.59 Freight Rail $500 billion in goods and services travel through PA each year. That investment would grow with upgrades to accommodate intermodal changes such as emerging needs from the natural gas industry and double- stack train access to our ports. Responded With an Average Rank of 3.53 Real T ime This involves the use of dynamic message signs, PennDOT’s 511P!.com system and social media. -
Bristol Corridor Study Preparing for Growth in Lower Bucks County
Bristol Corridor Study Preparing for Growth in Lower Bucks County JUNE 2021 Acknowledgements The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions to this study: William Cmorey, Bensalem Township Rich Brahler, Bucks County Planning Commission Leslie Kolifrath, Bristol County Planning Commission Evan Stone, Bucks County Planning Commission Christian Regosch, Bucks County Planning Commission Pete Krauss, Bucks County Industrial Development Authority Margie McKevitt, County of Bucks Jim Dillon, Bristol Borough Sally Bellaspica, Bristol Borough Randee Elton, Bristol Township Robert Montague, Bristol Township Tom Scott, Bristol Township Amanda Fuller, Gilmore & Associates Jacob Rigg, Gilmore & Associates Kurt Schroeder, Gilmore & Associates Scott Burton, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) Fran Hanney, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) Nipul Patel, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) Mark Raup, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Jeff Darwak, Redevelopment Authority of the County of Bucks Mark Cassel, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) Harley Cooper, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) Stephen Noll, TMA Bucks Joe McPadden, Tullytown Borough Andy Warren, Tullytown Borough Disclaimer: DVRPC is the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the nine-county Greater Philadelphia region, established via Interstate Compact between Pennsylvania and New Jersey. DVRPC serves as an advisory