EAST CAMPUS / MIT GATEWAY Alternative Approaches
Prepared by The Design Committee July 19. 2013 EAST CAMPUS / MIT GATEWAY Alternative Approaches
This report lays out strategic options for design and program of the MIT East Campus and a new Gateway to the institute in the Kendall Square area. Its purpose is to define principles for the planning and design of this critical area of the campus, in light of the recent up-zoning approval given to MIT by the City of Cambridge, and the intention of the MIT Investment Management Company (MITIMCO) to construct approximately 900,000 sq ft of commercial office and laboratory space on the campus south of Main Street. The report examines alternative approaches to achieving this amount of development that will also result in a high quality campus environment, mesh with the broader public realm of Kendall Square and the Charles River, and serve student and future academic needs.
This brief report and design study was prepared by a Design Committee of architecture, urban design, and planning faculty in the School of Architecture and Planning. The Design Committee was appointed by Provost Chris Kaiser and Executive Vice President and Treasurer Israel Ruiz following a recommendation of the faculty Task Force on Commu- nity Engagement in 2030 Planning on Development of MIT-Owned Property in Kendall Square. The Task Force was charged by the provost in 2012 with reviewing the Kendall Square project, and recommending whether to go forward. In the process, the Task Force raised concerns about the conceptual diagram put forth for development of the area, which had been prepared by MITIMCO. The Task Force agreed to “support moving forward with MIT’s submission of Design Committee the rezoning petition provided that … A comprehensive urban design plan for East Campus is conducted and com- Adèle Santos (Chair), J. Meejin Yoon (Coordinator) pleted after the petition is approved but before anything is built in the area covered by the petition. The plan needs to Nader Tehrani, Alexander d’Hooghe, Dennis Frenchman, consider alternatives to the current MITIMCo diagram for commercial building sites, floor plates, program, heights, and Anton Garcia-Abril, Carlo Ratti scale of development ...” guided by a set of design principles articulated by the Task Force.
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 1 Design Principles
The work of the Design Committee is aimed at opening up alternative approaches to the design and program- nent node of activity, equivalent to the function of MIT’s Lobby 7, containing destinations relevant to ming for East Campus and the MIT Gateway. It is also intended to inform the work of a subsequent campus the MIT community and helpful to visitors (e.g. an information office) linked to clearly recognizable planning consultant, which MIT will retain in the fall of 2013 to prepared a formal East Campus / MIT Gateway spaces that support learning and research (e.g. laboratories, studios, classrooms, study and meet- Plan. ing spaces accessible to the public). It should connect MIT directly to Kendall Square with minimal physical barriers or gaps. The gateway should be welcoming to residents and visitors. In examining the situation and preparing alternative approaches, the Design Committee was guided by and fully supports the Design Principles articulated by the Task Force. These are excerpted and included in full q East Campus buildings and spaces must create and convey a campus feeling that below, follow by a list of additional, more detailed guidelines that the Design Committee considers to be serves the needs of the MIT community in ways that attract people to the area across important in moving forward. the broad band of hours that typifies the rhythm of student, faculty, and staff life. This means, for example, providing amenities and services for students, faculty, staff and residents, with Principles defined by the Task Force to guide development of the area include: a minimal corporate presence (on the campus side), and well- defined public space for people to gather, affordable places to eat, bicycle parking, and access, etc. To ensure this, the ground floor “Design Principles, Criteria. ... Kendall Square, with its Red Line MBTA station, clearly has the poten- space on all buildings should be primarily reserved for inviting academic, student life, or retail uses, tial to serve as a new gateway to MIT, similar to the function now served by 77 Mass. Ave. to the west. and not have a “gated,” privatized character. Equally important, much of the property that would be developed for commercial tenants could house MIT uses at some point in the future. Therefore, it is critical that these buildings and the space they cre- q Any commercial space in Kendall Square should serve as an extension of the campus ate on the ground be considered first as a part of the campus designed to support our students, faculty and not the other way around. The businesses invited to locate there should complement and and staff… support the mission of MIT to promote innovation and start- ups and allow maximum access to students and faculty for research, class projects, and other mutual learning opportunities. Kendall q There must be a gateway to MIT worthy of MIT and its aspirations, mission and stan- Square should not just be a commercial or corporate office location that happens to be adjacent dards of design excellence. The gateway should not just be an entrance, but a physically promi- to a university.
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 2 q The portion of the development intended for commercial use should generate an appro- “Flexibility: Envelope versus Constraints. We have heard from the Cambridge City Manager, priate financial return to warrant investment of MIT endowment funds. However, given the MITIMCo, and others that the up-zoning petition would create an “envelope” that would allow for con- location of this development on campus and the need to support academic and student life, it may siderable flexibility in design and development options going forward… Among the options that should not be reasonable to expect the same level of return as that from commercial property developed be considered are: in sites removed from the campus. Alternatively, it would be appropriate for the Institute to consider investing a portion of the income from the Kendall commercial development into developing the q Less commercial development in the area shown as Site 3 on the MITIMCO plan, providing the campus spaces, facilities and academic environment planned for the area. potential to develop a significant gateway to the campus.
q Design of commercial development should proceed only in the context of a compre- q A better defined campus space connecting to Eastgate and Sloan that is more closely associated hensive plan for the future of the East Campus, including its public realm, academic, with Main Street, so there can be sufficient interaction and permeability to support campus activity. student life, transport, and recreational functions, taking into account potential disposi- This space should also facilitate interaction with the rest of the Institute, which is vital to achieving tion of all property between Main Street and the Charles River. It is not sufficient or prudent the goal of a “One MIT” campus culture. to design commercial buildings in the absence of a systematic analysis and clear understanding of how the remainder of the East Campus is intended to evolve. It is important that ample space for q More space for academic development and student life. future academic expansion be reserved in the up- zoning petition. We have not studied this issue in sufficient depth to reach a conclusion about how much space at this point, and, therefore, it is an- q Reallocation of height and massing to the edges rather than heart of the campus area, or a smaller other issue for further review and discussion in the post- up-zoning design phase and plan for East commercial project overall. Campus. q Alternate sites for commercial office and housing development that reduce impact on the campus.”
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 3 Design and Development Guidelines
Based on its analysis of the East Campus and alternative approaches, the Design Committee believes that q River Connection – will be established to enable direct physical and visual access from the gate- the following more specific guidelines should be added to the above to guide the work of the campus plan- way to the Charles River. It is possible to achieve this with minimal effort between 100 Memorial ning and design consultant on the East Campus / MIT Gateway: Drive and Building E-51, which is explored in the alternatives.
q Gateway spaces – will have a 21st century character, be humanely scaled, defined on the edges q Sloan School Connection – will be an important part of the spatial network and movement by buildings, planting or other elements, include inside (or covered) as well as outside public space, system on East Campus. It is envisioned as a defined public space, with activities along, that termi- to accommodate for the climate, and connect directly to Main Street and the Kendall T Stop. Digital nates in, and helps to create an appropriate entrance space to the Sloan School campus. media may be incorporated to engage the public with MIT, reveal hidden content, animate, and de- fine the place, providing a sense of MIT and the future. q Phasing – of development will occur over time, anticipated to be approximately 15 years. Phasing should be guided by a vision, but able to accommodate changes in program – such as the need for q Gateway programs – will incorporate activities and uses that engage MIT, students, faculty, re- additional academic space or housing – as MIT’s requirements evolve in the future. However, the search, and culture with the larger community, creating an integrated public realm. Examples of project needs to be spatially complete at each stage to ensure the integrity and usefulness of the appropriate programs discussed by the Committee include: MIT admissions information center, MIT whole East Campus throughout the development period. Museum, Edgerton Center (engaging elementary school kids), DUSP Science Teacher Education Program, CoLab, MITx production studios and outreach, ILP, MIT Press, Coop, card center, travel of- Additional considerations and guidelines are developed graphically in the report, and should be considered fice, community meeting spaces, cafes, restaurants. In the long run, an MIT Performing Arts Center integral with this list. (inviting the public) could provide an anchor for the gateway.
q Infinite Corridor – will connect through to the gateway space and Kendall T stop, extending on to Sloan. To enhance the connection, alterations to Buildings 23-25 and or Carleton Street may be considered.
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 4 PROJECT GOALS
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 5 1. Enhanced Innovation Cluster
MIT’s success in innovation is dependent on external interactions with the extended academic and business world and collaborations within
the Institute itself. The Institute has helped attract to land adjacent to campus a multitude of life-science and technology companies, ranging from start- up, venture backed firms to well established giants such as Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, Schlumberger, Microsoft, and Google. This fertile environment has enhanced research collaboration both within the Institute and between the Institute and industry, resulting in the creation of a highly productive discovery environment, a powerful economic engine, an extremely effective talent magnet, and one of the world’s most highly recognized life-science and technology centers. All of this helps MIT recruit and retain the best
faculty, students, and staff. MIT’s Kendall Square Initiative should provide new space to allow this powerful academic-industry innovation dynamic to grow.
Provide space for both new innovative academic initiatives and commercial enterprises.
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 6 2. Lively Urban Environment
Despite the excitement of the creative intellectual developments in and around Kendall Square, the physical environment is still not reflective of a world-class institution, leading innovation cluster, or
vibrant city square. Kendall Square has only a budding sense of excitement and identity and lacks fundamental ame-
nities such as basic retail services and places to entertain, meet and assemble that are
critical to a successful urban interactive place.
Create a destination gathering place with amenities and services and active streetscapes.
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 7 3. Vibrant Gateway
The Infinite Corridor, the major pedestrian thoroughfare through campus, ends well before Kendall Square and leaves the Sloan School disconnected. The revitalization of Ken-
dall Square provides an opportunity to extend the Infinite Corridor and establish a major new
gateway at the east end of the campus where it meets the central business district and the neighboring community.
Establish a vibrant gateway and connective link between the Institute, the central business district, and the Cambridge community.
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 8 4. Feasible Development
Achieving the vision of a revitalized Kendall Square will require a significant financial investment by MIT. However, to ensure that MIT does not need to divert precious academ-
ic resources from critical Institute initiatives such as faculty research and student scholarships, the plan should be economically
self-supporting in addition to being viable under market, physical, and legal/political considerations. Furthermore, to ensure city support, the plan should
generate increased tax payments to the City of Cambridge to provide funds to help it achieve its policy objectives, such as maintaining a low residential tax, creating more affordable housing units, and improving the school system.
Create an overall development plan that is economically viable
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 9 Elkus/Manfredi Architects Scheme t
7
8 Aerial by : www.lesvan
3 B
2 6 C 1
E 4 5 A D
Aerial Perspective
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 10 Bldg. 1 Kendall Hotel
Bldg. 2
E 38
E25 Whitaker E 39 College One Broadway
E 48 Bldg. 7 Bldg. 3
E23 Bldg. 6 MIT Medical
40k E40 Muckley Building
MIT Sloan School of Management
Elkus/Manfredi Architects - Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 11 CAMPUS
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 12 Campus Prototypes
Joseph Jacques Ramée - Architectural plan of Union College (1813) William Burgis - View of Harvard College (1726)
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 13 Harvard University
Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 14 Harvard University
Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 15 Harvard University
Harvard Yards
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 16 Harvard University
Harvard Yards
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 17 Columbia University
McKim, Mead & White - Columbia University (1903) W.A Boring - Project for a skyscraper completion to University Hall (1932)
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 18 Columbia University
Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 19 Columbia University
Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 20 Columbia University
Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 21 Columbia University
Columbia University Lawn
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 22 MIT
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 23 MIT
Plan of the proposed buildings for MIT (1913) William Welles Bosworth - Proposed MIT Academic Building
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 24 MIT
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 25 MIT
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 26 MIT
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 27 MIT
MIT Courts
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 28 MIT
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 29 MIT - 1920
MAIN CAMPUS
Charles River
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 30 MIT - 1950
MAIN CAMPUS
Charles River
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 31 MIT - 1970
WEST CAMPUS MAIN CAMPUS EAST CAMPUS
Charles River
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 32 MIT - 1990
WEST CAMPUS MAIN CAMPUS EAST CAMPUS
Charles River
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 33 MIT - 2013
WEST CAMPUS MAIN CAMPUS EAST CAMPUS
Charles River
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 34 MIT - 2013
WEST CAMPUS MAIN CAMPUS EAST CAMPUS
Charles River
MIT Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 35 MIT CAMPUS BUILDINGS
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 36 BUILDING + BUILDING + BUILDING = CAMPUS
Frank Gehry - Ray and Maria Stata Center
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 37 BUILDING + BUILDING + BUILDING = CAMPUS
Steven Holl - Simmons hall
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 38 EAST CAMPUS
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 39 East Campus
East Campus Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 40 East Campus
MIT
East Campus Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 41 East Campus
Akamai Draper
Norvatis One Labtop per Child Foundation
GreatPoint Envergy
Aurora Flight Sciences
Dyax Biogen Idec Google Endaca
Flagship Ventures Microsoft
MIT Innovative Company
East Campus Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 42 East Campus
Akamai Draper
Norvatis One Labtop per Child Foundation
GreatPoint Envergy
Aurora Flight Sciences
Dyax Biogen Idec Google Endaca
Flagship Ventures ACADEMIC - Microsoft ENTREPRENEUR GATHERING SPACE
MIT Innovative Company
East Campus Site Plan
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 43 ARE tech square
ARE Tech Square 30,000 SF
Kendall T station
Höweler + Yoon Architecture - Study for ARE Tech Square
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 44 SCALE COMPARISON
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 45 Scale Comparison
MIT East Campus
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 46 Scale Comparison
Scope of Work 500,000 SF
Killian Court Harvard Main Yard Columbia Main Yard ARE Tech Square 200,000 SF 160,000 SF 185,000 SF 30,000 SF
Comparison with Killian Court
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 47 URBAN CAMPUS
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 48 Novartis, Basel Headquarters
Novartis, Basel Headquarters - Aerial Photo
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 49 Novartis, Basel Headquarters
Novartis, Basel Headquarters - Public Spaces
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 50 Coherence
Novartis, Basel Headquarters - Campus Buildings
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 51 Connection
Novartis, Basel Headquarters - Connections
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 52 Public Spaces
Novartis, Basel Headquarters - Public Spaces
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 53 CRITICAL CONCEPTS
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 54 Critical Concepts
GATE INFINITE CORRIDOR CONNECTION WATER
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 55 Gate
Innovative Entrepreneur Innovative Entrepreneur
Innovative Entrepreneur
MIT Housing Kendall T station
Cambridge Boston
Main Campus
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 56 Infinite corridor
EXTENDED INFINITE CORRIDOR
Sloan School
EXISTING INFINITE CORRIDOR
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 57 Connection
Vassar Street Boston
Sloan
River Front
Killian Court
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 58 Water
Main Street
Cambridge Boston
NEW WATER CONNECTION
Infinite Corridor
Existing water connection
Charles River
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 59 STRATEGIES
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 60 Strategies
STRATEGY 1 STRATEGY 2 STRATEGY 3 East Campus Gateway as East Campus Gateway as East Campus Gateway as Public Space Network Infinite Corridor extension
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 61 Strategy 1 - Gateway as Public Space
STRATEGY 1 Gateway as Public Space
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 62 Strategy 1 - Gateway as Public Space
East Campus Main Court
Eastman West Campus Court Main Court McDermott Court
Killian Court
MIT Court Yards
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 63 Strategy 1 - Gateway as Public Space
Killian Court Harvard Main Yard Columbia Main Yard ARE Tech Square 200,000 SF 160,000 SF 185,000 SF 30,000 SF
Scale Comparison
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 64 Strategy 1A - Grand Lawn
155’ 10 floors
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 65 Strategy 1A - Grand Lawn
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 66 Strategy 1A - Grand Lawn
top left : Parc André-Citroën, Paris bottom left : DS+R - Hypar Pavilion, New York right : Bryant Park, New York
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 67 Strategy 1A - Grand Lawn
Michel Desvigne - Keio University, Tokyo Chyutin Architects - BGU University Entrance Square & Art Gallery, Israel
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 68 Strategy 1A - Grand Lawn
155’ 10 floors
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 69 Strategy 1B - Grand Canopy
Anish Kapoor - Cloud Gate, Chicago Buckminster Fuller Dome
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 70 Strategy 1B - Grand Canopy
155’ 10 floors
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 71 Strategy 1B - Grand Canopy
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 72 Strategy 1B - Grand Canopy
top left, right : Peter walker - University of texas at Dallas bottom left : Norman Foster - Petronas University of Technology, Malaysia
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 73 Strategy 1B - Grand Canopy
Eskew+Dumez+Ripple - Louisiana State Museum
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 74 Strategy 2 - Gateway as Network
STRATEGY 2 Gateway as Network
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 75 Strategy 2A - Gateway as Network
ACADEMIC.
LAB. 1 26,600 SF ACADEMIC. 1 155’ 10 floors 24,600 SF 95’ 6 floors
LAB. 3 36,200 SF LAB. 2 155’ 10 floors 28,270 SF 155’ 10 floors
ACADEMIC. 3 18,700 SF 95’ 6 floors ACADEMIC. 4 ACADEMIC. 2 31,000 SF 41,440 SF 95’ 6 floors 95’ 6 floors
ACADEMIC. 5 35,693 SF 95’ 6 floors
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 76 Strategy 2A - Gateway as Network
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 77 Strategy 2B - Gateway as Network
LAB. 1 26,600 SF ACADEMIC. 1 24,600 SF 170’ 11 floors ACADEMIC. 2 170’ 11 floors 22,779 SF 170’ 11 floors
LAB. 2 28,270 SF 170’ 11 floors
LAB. 3 33,604 SF 155’ 10 floors ACADEMIC. 4 ACADEMIC. 3 15,378 SF 34,096 SF 95 6 floors 95’ 6 floors
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 78 Strategy 2B - Gateway as Network
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 79 Strategy 2 - Gateway as Network
University of Illinois Desire LIne Berger + Parkkinen - Nordic Embassy Complex , Berlin
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 80 Strategy 2 - Gateway as Network
Fermin Vazquez - Torico Square, Spain
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 81 Strategy 3 - Gateway as Infinite Corridor extension
STRATEGY 3 Gateway as Infinite Connection
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 82 Strategy 3A - Gateway as Infinite Corridor extension
LAB. 1 25,000 SF 185’ 12 floors ACADEMIC. 1 3,200 SF 155’ 10 floors LAB. 3 26,000SF LAB. 2 185’ 12 floors ACADEMIC. 2 25,000 SF 9,189 SF 185’ 12 floors 155’ 10 floors
ACADEMIC. 3 36,000 SF 200’ 13 floor
ACADEMIC. 5 12,600 SF ACADEMIC. 4 150’ 10 FLOOR 8,400SF 150’ 10 floor
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 83 Strategy 3A - Gateway as Infinite Corridor extension
LAB. 1 25,000 SF 185’ 12 floors
LAB. 3 ACADEMIC 1. 14,500 SF 26,000SF 155’ 10 floors LAB. 2 185’ 12 floors 25,000 SF 185’ 12 floors
ACADEMIC. 3 36,000 SF 200’ 13 floor
ACADEMIC. 5 12,600 SF ACADEMIC. 4 150’ 10 FLOOR 8,400SF 150’ 10 floor
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 84 Strategy 3A - Gateway as Infinite Corridor extension
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 85 Strategy 3B - Gateway as Infinite Corridor extension
LAB. 1 25,000 SF ACADEMIC. 1 185’ 12 floors 23,200 SF 125’ 8 floors
LAB. 3 26,000SF LAB. 2 185’ 12 floors 25,000 SF 185’ 12 floors
ACADEMIC. 3 ACADEMIC.2 36,000 SF 29,200 SF 125’ 8 floors 125’ 8 floors
ACADEMIC. 5 12,600 SF ACADEMIC. 4 120’ 8 floors 8,400SF 120’ 8 floors
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 86 Strategy 3B - Gateway as Infinite Corridor extension
LAB. 1 25,000 SF ACADEMIC. 1 185’ 12 floors 24,000 SF 125’ 8 floors
LAB. 3 26,000SF LAB. 2 185’ 12 floors 25,000 SF 185’ 12 floors
ACADEMIC. 3 ACADEMIC.2 36,000 SF 29,200 SF 125’ 8 floors 125’ 8 floors
ACADEMIC. 5 12,600 SF ACADEMIC. 4 120’ 8 floors 8,400SF 120’ 8 floors
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 87 Strategy 3B - Gateway as Infinite Corridor extension
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 88 Strategy 3 - Gateway as Infinite Corridor extension
Weiss Manfredi - Olympic Sculpture Park, Seattle DS+R - High Line, New York
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 89 Strategy 3 - Gateway as Infinite Corridor extension
West 8 - Avenida De Portugal, Madrid Peter walker - University of california Library Walk, San Diego
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 90 Critical Concepts
GATE INFINITE CORRIDOR CONNECTION WATER
Strategies
STRATEGY 1 STRATEGY 2 STRATEGY 3 East Campus Gateway as East Campus Gateway as East Campus Gateway as Public Space Network Infinite Corridor extension
East Campus / MIT Gateway - Alternative Approaches 91