DOCSLIB.ORG

Timeline: Major Events Since the Opening of Korea (1876)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Timeline: Major Events Since the Opening of Korea (1876) 3346_17_TIMELINE.qxp 11/1/10 12:13 PM Page 383 1 2 3 4 TIMELINE: MAJOR EVENTS SINCE 5 6 THE OPENING OF KOREA (1876) 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 2 February 1876 The Korea-Japan Treaty of Kanghwa (Korea-Japan) 5 signed. Korea “opened. 6 10 April 1881 The “Gentlemen” delegation dispatched to Japan. 7 6 April 1882 Treaty signed with the US. 8 4 April 1884 Treaty signed with Britain 9 4 May 1884 Treaty signed with Italy. 20 15 May 1884 Treaty signed with Russia. 1 17 October 1884 Kim Ok Gyun leads the Gapsin Coup. In a few days, 2 Chinese forces are able to overwhelm the Progressives 3 and their Japanese supporters. 4 3 May 1886 Treaty signed with France. 5 1892 Dong Hak founder restoration movement. 6 10 January 1894 Farmers’ revolt in Go Bu (Dong Hak peasant 7 Revolution). 8 1 August 1894 Sino-Japanese War breaks out. 9 17 April 1895 The Treaty of Shimonoseki was signed between the 30 Empire of Japan and Qing Empire of China, ending the 1 First Sino-Japanese War. 2 20 August 1895 Queen Min murdered (Eul Mi Sa Byeon). 3 11 August 1897 Korean Empire proclaimed by King Kojong. 4 30 January 1902 The first Anglo-Japanese Alliance signed. 5 8 February 1904 Russo-Japanese War breaks out. 36 23 February 1904 Protocol signed between Japan and Korea. 37 29 July 1905 US and Japan form the secret Katsura-Taft. 38 17 November 1905 Japan establishes a protectorate over Korea; Japan 39 assumes control over Korean foreign affairs. 40 June 1907 The Second Peace Conference was held in the Hague. 41 Emperor Gojong secretly sent three representatives to 42 bring the problems of Korea to the world’s attention. 43 The three envoys were refused access to the public 44 debates by the international delegates who claimed 45 it would violate the legality of the protectorate 46R 3346_17_TIMELINE.qxp 11/1/10 12:13 PM Page 384 384 Korea’s Foreign Policy Dilemmas 1 convention. Out of despair, one of the Korean repre- 2 sentatives, Yi Jun, committed suicide at the Hague. 3x 22 August 1910 Korea becomes a colony of Japan when Prime Minister 4 Yi Wan-yong signs the Treaty of Annexation, which is 5 proclaimed by Emperor Sunjong on 29 August 1910. 6 27 July 1914 World War I breaks out. 7 8 January 1918 US President Woodrow Wilson enunciates his 8 Fourteen Points. 9 11 November 1918 World War I ends. 10 22 January 1919 Death of former Chosun King/Emperor Kojong. 1 1 March 1919 March First Movement begins. Shut-downs spread 2 throughout the peninsula, increasing in frequency 3 throughout March and reaching their peak in early 4 April. 5 9 April 1919 Korean Provisional Government formed in Shanghai. 6 10 June 1926 Attempts to launch nationwide protests on the day of 7 former Emperor Sunjong’s funeral unsuccessful. 8 September 1931 The Manchurian Incident precipitates the Japanese 9 military takeover of Manchuria, which becomes the 20 Japanese-controlled state of Manchukuo. 1 June 1937 Gradual escalation of Japanese military activity in 2 China culminates in all-out war against China follow- 3 ing the Marco Polo Bridge incident outside Beijing. 4 September 1940 Kim Il Sung abandons guerilla campaign and retreats 5 into the Soviet Union, where he and his group eventu- 6 ally join the Red Army. 7 7 December 1941 The Pacific War begins with the Japanese bombing of 8 Pearl Harbor. 9 22–26 November 1943 Joint Declaration by China, the UK, and the United 30 States at the Cairo Conference, that Korea should 1 become free and independent. 2 28 November~ At the Cairo Conference, the USA, Britain and China 3 1 December 1943 resolve to place postwar Korea under trusteeship, 4 preparatory to independence “in due course.” 5 Roosevelt proposes to place Korea under international 36 trusteeship. Stalin agrees. 37 8 February 1945 Stalin and Roosevelt reaffirm the trusteeship concept 38 at the Yalta conference. 39 July 1945 Potsdam Declaration reaffirms the Cairo Declaration. 40 8 August 1945 The Soviet Union enters the Pacific War. 41 10 August 1945 The first Soviet troops land in northeast Korea. 42 15 August 1945 The Japanese surrender to the Allies, Chosun (Korean) 43 Governor-General Abe Nobuyuki hands over power to 44 the local committees of the Provisional Committee for 45 Korean Independence (PCKI) under the chairmanship 46R of Lyuh Woon-hyung..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE DREAM HOTEL Representatives of Japan and China Signed The
    CHAPTER SIX THE DREAM HOTEL Representatives of Japan and China signed the Treaty of Shimonoseki on 17 April 1895, bringing the Sino-Japanese War to an end and alerting the world to Japan’s emergence as a military power in East Asia and its suc- cess, after a mere three decades, in the project of modernisation and industrialisation. Shumpanrō, the Japanese inn where the cosignatories gathered, was only a few steps away from the house acquired by Holme, Ringer & Co. in 1890 to serve as a residence for their agent in Shimonoseki (see Chapter 8). In addition to recognition of Korean independence, the terms of the Treaty of Shimonoseki included China’s cession of Formosa (Taiwan) and the Penghu (Pescadores) Islands to Japan, as well as rights to the stra- tegic Liaotong (Liaodong) Peninsula. China also granted permission for Japanese companies to operate ships on the Yangtze River and establish manufacturing facilities in Shanghai and other treaty ports, advantages similar to those won by Britain in the wake of the Opium Wars. China had to pay a crushing war indemnity of some 200 million silver taels, again simulating the terms of the Treaty of Nanking and Treaty of Tientsin ear- lier in the century. Victory brought Japan headlong into the commercial, political and military maelstrom of East Asia and translated into a sharp boost in Nagasaki’s fortunes as the closest port to China and a coal depot, supply harbour and rest place for foreign warships and merchantmen. In early 1896, the local English-language newspaper reported that: During the year 1895 no less than 160 different men-of-war of all nationalities visited Nagasaki.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of the Dualistic International Order Into the Modern Treaty System in the Sino-Korean Relationship
    International Journal of Korean History (Vol.15 No.2, Aug.2010) 97 G Transformation of the Dualistic International Order into the Modern Treaty System in the Sino-Korean Relationship Song Kue-jin* IntroductionG G Whether in the regional or global scale, the international order can be defined as a unique system within which international issues develop and the diplomatic relations are preserved within confined time periods. The one who has leadership in such international order is, in actuality, the superpowers regardless of the rationale for their leading positions, and the orderliness of the system is determined by their political and economic prowess.1 The power that led East Asia in the pre-modern era was China. The pre- modern East Asian regional order is described as the tribute system. The tribute system is built on the premise of installation, so it was important that China designate and proclaim another nation as a tributary state. The system was not necessarily a one-way imposition; it is possible to view the system built on mutual consent as the tributary state could benefit from China’s support and preserve the domestic order at times of political instability to person in power. Modern capitalism challenged and undermined the East Asian tribute GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG * HK Research Professor, ARI, Korea University 98 Transformation of the Dualistic International Order into the ~ system led by China, and the East Asian international relations became a modern system based on treaties. The Western powers brought the former tributary states of China into the outer realm of the global capitalistic system. With the arrival of Western imperialistic powers, the East Asian regional order faced an inevitable transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Empires and Indigenous Peoples, Global Transformation and the Limits of International Society
    Introduction Empires and Indigenous Peoples, Global Transformation and the Limits of International Society PROLOGUE: THE WUSHE REBELLION AND INDIGENOUS RENAISSANCE IN TAIWAN On October 27, 1930, terror visited the small community of Japanese settler- expatriates in the picturesque resort town of Wushe, an administrative center nestled on a plateau in the central mountains of Taiwan.1 On that day, some 300 indigenes led by Mona Ludao raided government arsenals, ambushed isolated police units, and turned a school assembly into a bloodbath. All told, Mona’s men killed 134 Japanese nationals by day’s end, many of them butchered with long dag- gers and beheaded. Alerted by a distressed phone call from an escapee, the Japanese police apparatus, with backing from military units stationed in Taiwan, responded with genocidal fury. Aerial bombardment, infantry sweeps, and local mercenaries killed roughly 1,000 men, women, and children in the ensuing months. A cor- nered Mona Ludao removed to the countryside and then killed his family and hanged himself to avoid capture. Subsequently, the Japanese government relocated the remaining residents of Mona’s village, Mehebu, forever wiping it off the map.2 Over the course of Japanese rule (1895–1945), the Taiwan Government- General forcibly relocated hundreds of other hamlets like Mehebu. The invasive and exploitative policies that provoked Mona and his confederates also eroded pre- colonial forms of social organization, authority, and ritual life among Taiwan’s indigenes. As it severed bonds between indigenes and their lands, in addition to prohibiting or reforming folkways it deemed injurious to its civilizing mission, the government-general nonetheless laid the groundwork for the emergence of Taiwan Indigenous Peoples as a conscious and agentive historical formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia's Exotic Futures in the Far Beyond the Present
    ARTICLE .1 Asia’s Exotic Futures in the Far beyond the Present Vahid V. Motlagh Independent Futurist Iran Abstract This paper attempts to deconstruct and challenge the dominant discourses with regard to the longer term futures of Asia. First the mentality of reviving the shining past as well as paying attention to the GDP growth rate in the race of the East to take over the position of leaders from the West is reviewed. An associa- tion is made between a memorable metaphor and the scenario of reviving the shining past. Then some guide- lines are introduced and applied to the far ahead futures of Asia including a) violating old implicit assump- tions by applying what if mechanism, b) identifying and articulating distinct value systems, and c) detecting weak signals that may hint to the next mainstream. Four scenarios are built within the rationale of transforma- tion scenario. The aim is to do exotic futures studies and to create alternative images. Such images not only may help shift the identity of future Asians but also influence today decisions and actions of both Asians and non Asians. Keywords: Asia, East, West, value systems, transformation scenarios, space technology, life technology Introduction In the wake of a new kind of globalization in the modern era sometimes it may appear rather silly to ask a total stranger a very typical question: "Where are you from?" The point is that some people are "placeless" in a sense that they do not belong to a specific country, culture, language, and etc. Placelessness and not having clear and vivid roots may result in potential gains and pains in the life of an individual to the extent that, a related postmodern notion has become fashionable nowa- days: to have "multiple identities" (Giridharadas, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • 251 1. Wushe Is in Today's Ren'ai Township in Nantou Prefecture
    Notes INTRODUCTION 1. Wushe is in today’s Ren’ai Township in Nantou Prefecture, Taiwan. 2. Taiwan sōtokufu keimukyoku, ed., Takasagozoku chōsasho dai go hen: Bansha gaikyō, meishin (Taipei: Taiwan sōtokufu keimukyoku, 1938), 132–33. 3. Ronald Niezen, The Origins of Indigenism: Human Rights and the Politics of Identity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003); James Clifford, Returns: Becoming Indig- enous in the Twenty-First Century (Harvard University Press, 2013). 4. Laura R. Graham and H. Glenn Penny, “Performing Indigeneity: Emergent Identity, Self-Determination, and Sovereignty,” in Performing Indigeneity: Global Histories and Con- temporary Experiences, ed. Laura R. Graham and H. Glenn Penny (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2014), 1–5. 5. Wang Fu-chang, Zokugun: Gendai Taiwan no esunikku imajineeshon, trans. Matsuba Jun and Hung Yuru (Tokyo: Tōhō shoten, 2014), 86–87. 6. Anthropologist Scott Simon writes that “ . today’s political debates about Indigenous rights are rooted in an unfolding political dynamic that predates both the global indigenous rights movement and even the arrival of the ROC on Taiwan. What we know today as Indigenous Formosa is a co-creation of the resulting relationship between the Japanese state and diverse political constellations among many Austronesian peoples across the is- land.” From “Making Natives: Japan and the Creation of Indigenous Formosa,” in Japanese Taiwan: Colonial Rule and Its Contested Legacy, ed. Andrew Morris (London: Bloomsbury Press, 2015), 75. 7. “Taiwan Indigenous Peoples” is an English translation of Taiwan Yuanzhuminzu, the officially adopted name for indigenous peoples in Taiwan. This book will use the term indigenes to avoid awkward constructions and wordiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Soh-Joseon-Kingdom.Pdf
    Asia-Pacific Economic and Business History Conference, Berkeley, 2011 (Feb. 18-20): Preliminary Draft Institutional Differences and the Great Divergence:* Comparison of Joseon Kingdom with the Great Britain Soh, ByungHee Professor of Economics Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea e-mail: [email protected] Abstract If modern Koreans in the 20th century could achieve a remarkable economic growth through industrialization, why couldn’t their ancestors in Joseon Kingdom in early modern period achieve an industrial revolution at that time? This is the fundamental question of this paper. There existed several social and institutional constraints in Joseon Kingdom (1392-1897 A.D.) in the 17th through 19th centuries that made her industrial development impossible. The strictly defined social classes and the ideology of the ruling class deprived Joseon Kingdom of the entrepreneurial spirit and the incentives to invent new technology necessary for industrial development. Markets and foreign trades were limited and money was not used in transaction until late 17th century. Technicians and engineers were held in low social esteem and there was no patent to protect an inventor’s right. The education of Confucian ethical codes was intended to inculcate loyalty to the ruling class Yangban and the King. The only way to get out of the hard commoner’s life was to pass the national civil service examination to become a scholar-bureaucrat. Joseon Kingdom was a tributary country to Qing Dynasty and as such it had to be careful about technological and industrial development not to arouse suspicion from Qing. Joseon was not an incentivized society while the Great Britain was an incentivized society that was conducive to Industrial Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Coding Units
    INSTITUTE Country Coding Units v11.1 - March 2021 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2021. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v11.1” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this ven- ture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/ funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) .
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of New York State Is Designed As a Resource for All Education Professionals, but with Particular Consideration to Those Who Work with Bilingual1 Students
    TTHE LLANGUAGES OF NNEW YYORK SSTATE:: A CUNY-NYSIEB GUIDE FOR EDUCATORS LUISANGELYN MOLINA, GRADE 9 ALEXANDER FFUNK This guide was developed by CUNY-NYSIEB, a collaborative project of the Research Institute for the Study of Language in Urban Society (RISLUS) and the Ph.D. Program in Urban Education at the Graduate Center, The City University of New York, and funded by the New York State Education Department. The guide was written under the direction of CUNY-NYSIEB's Project Director, Nelson Flores, and the Principal Investigators of the project: Ricardo Otheguy, Ofelia García and Kate Menken. For more information about CUNY-NYSIEB, visit www.cuny-nysieb.org. Published in 2012 by CUNY-NYSIEB, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, NY, NY 10016. [email protected]. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Alexander Funk has a Bachelor of Arts in music and English from Yale University, and is a doctoral student in linguistics at the CUNY Graduate Center, where his theoretical research focuses on the semantics and syntax of a phenomenon known as ‘non-intersective modification.’ He has taught for several years in the Department of English at Hunter College and the Department of Linguistics and Communications Disorders at Queens College, and has served on the research staff for the Long-Term English Language Learner Project headed by Kate Menken, as well as on the development team for CUNY’s nascent Institute for Language Education in Transcultural Context. Prior to his graduate studies, Mr. Funk worked for nearly a decade in education: as an ESL instructor and teacher trainer in New York City, and as a gym, math and English teacher in Barcelona.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syrian Civil War: a Proxy War in the 21St Century a Senior Research Thesis California State University Maritime Academy Felipe I
    1 The Syrian Civil War: A Proxy War in the 21st Century A Senior Research Thesis California State University Maritime Academy Felipe I. Rosales The Syrian Civil War: A Proxy War in the 21st Century 2 Abstract The Syrian Civil War is one of the most devastating conflicts of the 21st century and the cause of the worst humanitarian crisis in recent history. It stems between the ruling Al-Assad Regime and a series of opposition rebel groups. The Assad Regime has had the backing of this historical ally, the Russian Federation. Rebel forces have had the continued backing from a collation between western nations, led by the United States. The purpose of this thesis is to determine if the Syrian Civil War was a proxy war between the United States and Russia, and to determine what it means for the future of US-Russia relations. SInce the end of the Second World War and the rise of the nuclear deterrent, war by proxy has become a common strategy used by larger powers. If the Syrian Civil War is truly a proxy war between the United States and Russia, it brings to question the validity of the end of the Cold War. By comparing it to previous Cold War-era proxy wars, we can derive the features that make up a proxy war and apply them to the Syrian Civil War. This thesis uses several precious proxy wars as case studies. These include the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Afghan-Soviet War. While each of these was a very different war, they each share a handful of similarities that make them Proxy Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan and the Ryukyus (Okinawa)
    Volume 11 | Issue 21 | Number 3 | Article ID 4121 | May 26, 2013 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Taiwan and the Ryukyus (Okinawa) in Asia-Pacific Multilateral Relations – a Long-term Historical Perspective on Territorial Claims and Conflicts アジア太平洋地域の多国間関係における台湾 と琉球諸島（沖縄）領土権主張や紛争を長期的視野でとらえる Lin Man-houng This article summarizes relevant historical developments involving Taiwan and Okinawa in Asia-Pacific multilateral relations over the longue durée, and suggests future prospects. 1. Both Taiwan and the Ryukyus are within the Kuroshio (Black Tide) Current Civilization Zone (from approximately the beginning of the 3rd Century): At that time, crops such as cassava and yams traveled northbound with the Kuroshio Currents, which ran from the Philippines to Taiwan and the Ryukyus to Kyushu, while crops such as millet in northern parts of South East Asia traveled to Taiwan via This map was made by Weng Weilong and the South Sea and further traveled to the translated by Li Yuting of the GIS center of Ryukyus and Kyushu. Together with the path of the Academia Sinica. Maps have been rice from south of China’s Yangtze River via made at the author’s request with a Korea to Kyushu, Japan these were two research grant of Academia Sinica. important sea-borne cultural exchange paths in the Asia-Pacific. However, by the 3rd Century, the direct route from south of the Yangzi to 2. Both areas were at one time central to the central Japan, as well as the Silk Road from trading hub in East Asian waters (14th~17th Chang’an in Northwest China to Central Asia, Century): As the Ryukyus became the “Bridge and the shipping route from Guangzhou to to various countries” including China, Japan, India superseded the aforesaid routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Encounter with the West: a History Institute for Teachers - FPRI Page 1 of 7
    China’s Encounter with the West: A History Institute for Teachers - FPRI Page 1 of 7 Footnotes Search The Newsletter of FPRI’s Wachman CenterChina’s Encounter with the West: A History Institute for Teachers By Trudy Kuehner, Reporter On March 1-2, 2008, FPRI’s Wachman Center presented a weekend of discussion on China’s Encounter with the West for 45 teachers from 21 states across the country, held at and co-sponsored by the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Asia Program. Additional participants logged in for the webcast from around the country and the world. See www.fpri.org for videocasts and texts of lectures. The Wachman Center’s History Institute for Teachers is co- chaired by David Eisenhower and Walter A. McDougall. Core support is provided by The Annenberg Foundation; additional support for specific programs is provided by W.W. Keen Butcher, Bruce H. Hooper, John M. Templeton, Jr., the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. The next history weekends are America in the Civil War Era, May 17-18 (Kenosha, WI); What Students Need To Know About America’s Wars, Part I: 1622–1919, July 26-27 (Wheaton, IL); and Teaching the History of Innovation, October 18-19 (Kansas City, MO). China’s Early Encounters with the West: A History in Reverse Andrew Wilson of the U.S. Naval War College explained how the image of a weak backward China adrift in a modern world, bullied by Western powers, dominates China’s historical memory and national identity. Its early encounters with the West are viewed through the prism of the Qing Dynasty’s (1644–1911) nineteenth-century humiliations, exemplified by a series of Western military victories enshrined in “unequal treaties.” But in China’s earliest encounters with the West, the Ming (1368–1644) and early Qing held the economic, technological, and military advantages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unhelpfulness of Treaty Law in Solving the Sino-Japan Sovereign Dispute Over the Diaoyu Islands
    The Unhelpfulness of Treaty Law in Solving the Sino-Japan Sovereign Dispute over the Diaoyu Islands Chi Manjiao* The sovereignty dispute over the Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan is a sensitive issue touching upon various aspects of international law. One of the major claims of both countries is whether the Islands have been ceded to Japan, and if so, have they been reverted to China. Since cession and reversion were completed through a series of treaties, this paper explores the dispute by evaluating treaty law. The paper first outlines three sovereignty claims over the Islands and then provides a chronological review of the pertinent treaties. It then discusses the non- applicability contention and the treaty interpretation contention, two interpretations popular among mainland Chinese scholars. The article concludes that treaty law cannot provide a satisfactory solution to the dispute and suggests that both countries should resort to other international laws of territorial acquisition and strive for more innovative political solutions. I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 164 II. A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE THREE MAJOR LEGAL CLAIMS ........ 167 III. A REVIEW OF TREATIES PERTAINING TO THE DIAOYU ISLANDS 169 A. The Treaty of Shimonoseki (1895) .................................. 169 B. The Wartime Declarations (the 1940s) ............................. 169 C. The San Francisco Treaty (1951) ..................................... 170 D. The Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty (1952) .......................... 171 * B.A., LL.M., PhD in Law, Associate Professor of International Law, Law School, Xiamen University, PRC. This article is based on a paper presented at the “International Symposium on Dokdo Islands: Sovereignty Dispute in East Asia” held in Washington D.C. on May 20, 2010.
    [Show full text]