Forest Inventory and Analysis National Urban Fia Plot Field Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forest Inventory and Analysis National Urban Fia Plot Field Guide FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL URBAN FIA PLOT FIELD GUIDE FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR URBAN FIA PLOTS Southern Research Station Version 7.2.1 FOREST SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE April 2018 National Urban FIA Plot Field Guide, Version 7.2.1 SRS Edition April 2018 Note to User: URBAN FIA Field Guide 7.2.1 is based on the National CORE Field Guide, Version 7.2; with the exception of Section 5.9, Section 5.9.2, and Appendix 6, which are based on the National CORE Field Guide, Version 8.0. Data elements are national CORE unless indicated as follows: National CORE data elements that end in “+U” (e.g., x.x+U) have had values, codes, or text added, changed, or adjusted from the CORE program. Any additional URBAN FIA text for a national CORE data element is hi-lighted or shown as an "Urban Note". All URBAN FIA data elements end in “U” (e.g., x.xU). The text for an URBAN FIA data element is not hi- lighted and does not have a corresponding variable in CORE. URBAN FIA electronic file notes: o national CORE data elements that are not applicable in URBAN FIA are formatted as light gray or light gray hidden text. o hyperlink cross-references are included for various sections, figures, and tables. *National CORE data elements retain their national CORE field guide data element/variable number but may not retain their national CORE field guide location or sequence within the guide. 1 National Urban FIA Plot Field Guide, Version 7.2.1 SRS Edition April 2018 CHANGES FROM THE URBAN FIA PLOT FIELD GUIDE VERSION 7.2 TO 7.2.1 - ABRIDGED .......... 11 FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 14 INTRODUCTION+U .................................................................................................................................... 14 Urban Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Field Guide Layout ................................................................................................................................... 15 Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 16 0.0+U GENERAL DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................. 17 0.1+U Plot Setup .................................................................................................................................. 18 0.2+U Plot Integrity .............................................................................................................................. 18 0.3U Plot Monumentation ......................................................................................................................... 19 0.3.1U MONUMENT TYPE................................................................................................................... 19 0.3.2U MONUMENT NUMBER ............................................................................................................ 19 0.3.3U SUBPLOT / MICROPLOT NUMBER ........................................................................................ 20 0.3.4U SUBPLOT / MICROPLOT OFFSET POINT ............................................................................. 20 0.3.5U WITNESS OBJECT / SP / RP TYPE ........................................................................................ 21 0.3.6U WITNESS OBJECT / SP / RP SPECIES .................................................................................. 21 0.3.7U OBJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 21 0.3.8U MONUMENT AZIMUTH ............................................................................................................ 22 0.3.9U MONUMENT HORIZONTAL DISTANCE ................................................................................. 22 0.3.10U MONUMENT DBH / DRC ......................................................................................................... 22 0.4U GPS Starting Point Variables ........................................................................................................... 22 0.4.1U SP/RP GPS UNIT ..................................................................................................................... 23 0.4.2U SP/RP GPS ENTRY METHOD ................................................................................................. 23 0.4.3U SP/RP GPS DATUM ................................................................................................................. 23 0.4.4U SP/RP COORDINATE SYSTEM .............................................................................................. 24 0.4.5U SP/RP LATITUDE DEGREES .................................................................................................. 24 0.4.6U SP/RP LATITUDE MINUTES .................................................................................................... 24 0.4.7U SP/RP LATITUDE SECONDS .................................................................................................. 24 0.4.8U SP/RP LONGITUDE DEGREES ............................................................................................... 24 0.4.9U SP/RP LONGITUDE MINUTES ................................................................................................ 25 0.4.10U SP/RP LONGITUDE SECONDS .............................................................................................. 25 0.4.11U SP/RP UTM ZONE (URBAN OPTIONAL) ................................................................................ 25 0.4.12U SP/RP EASTING (X) UTM (URBAN OPTIONAL) .................................................................... 25 0.4.13U SP/RP NORTHING (Y) UTM (URBAN OPTIONAL) ................................................................. 25 1.0+U PLOT LEVEL DATA ........................................................................................................................ 26 1.0.1U CYCLE ...................................................................................................................................... 26 1.0.2U SUB-CYCLE .............................................................................................................................. 26 1.1 STATE .............................................................................................................................................. 26 1.2 COUNTY .......................................................................................................................................... 26 1.3 PLOT NUMBER ............................................................................................................................... 27 1.4+U URBAN PLOT STATUS ............................................................................................................ 27 1.5 NONFOREST SAMPLING STATUS ............................................................................................... 27 1.6 NONFOREST PLOT STATUS ........................................................................................................ 27 1.7+U URBAN PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON ................................................................................ 28 1.8 NONFOREST PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON ............................................................................. 28 1.9 SUBPLOTS EXAMINED ................................................................................................................. 28 1.10+U SAMPLE KIND ...................................................................................................................... 29 1.11+U PREVIOUS PLOT NUMBER (URBAN OPTIONAL) ............................................................. 29 1.12 FIELD GUIDE VERSION ................................................................................................................ 29 1.13 Current Date ..................................................................................................................................... 29 1.13.1 YEAR ........................................................................................................................................ 29 1.13.2 MONTH ..................................................................................................................................... 30 1.13.3 DAY ........................................................................................................................................... 30 1.14 DECLINATION (URBAN OPTIONAL) .............................................................................................. 30 1.15+U HORIZONTAL DISTANCE TO IMPROVED ROAD .............................................................. 30 1.16+U WATER ON PLOT ................................................................................................................. 31 1.17 QA STATUS ..................................................................................................................................... 31 1.18 CREW NUMBER .............................................................................................................................. 32 1.18.1U QA SCORE (URBAN OPTIONAL) ............................................................................................ 32 1.18.1.1U QA SCORE CREW NUMBER (URBAN OPTIONAL)
Recommended publications
  • Report of the Commissioner of the General Land Office, 1860
    University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 11-29-1860 Report of the Commissioner of the General Land Office, 1860 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation S. Exec. Doc. No. 2, 36th Cong., 2nd Sess.(1860) This Senate Executive Document is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. 49 REPORT OF THE CO~I~IJISSIONER OF TI-IE GENER.AL LAND OFFICE. ' GENERAL LAND OFFICE, November 29, 1860. Sn-t: During the past year the operations of the land system have extended by direct administrq.tive action within the limits of all the political divisions embracing the public domain, to wit: Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, California, Oregon, Minnesota, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri, and to the Territories of Kansas, Nebraska, Minnesota, (known as Dacotah,) Washington, New Mexico, and Utah. Our correspondence has passed those limits, having extended within all the other members of the Confederacy where non-resident claimants hold interests, requiring adjustment under bounty land grants for services in the war of the revolution, in the last war with Great Britain, the war with Mexico, with Indian tribes, under foreign titles, and under other grants in great diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contemporary Assessment of Tree Species in Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve, Southern India
    Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2017, 7(2): 30-46 Article A contemporary assessment of tree species in Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve, Southern India M. Sathya, S. Jayakumar Environmental Informatics and Spatial Modeling Lab, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Pondicherry University, Puducherry 605014, India E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 December 2016; Accepted 5 February 2017; Published online 1 June 2017 Abstract Tree species inventory was carried out in five forest types of Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve (STR). The forest type was divided into homogenous vegetation strata (HVS) based on the altitude, temperature, precipitation and forest types. A total of 8 ha area was sampled using 0.1 ha (20m 50m) plot and all tree species ≥ 1cm girth at breast height (gbh) within the plot were enumerated. In all, 4614 individuals were recorded that belonged to 122 species representing 90 genera and 39 families. Fabaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Rubiaceae, and Combretaceae were the species-rich families. The mean stand density of STR was 577 ha-1, but it varied from 180 ha-1 to 779 ha-1. Similarly, the mean basal area of the STR was 14.51 m2ha-1 which ranged between 8.41 m2 ha-1 and 26.96 m2 ha-1. The stem count was low at the lowest girth class (1-10 cm gbh) and high at 20-30 cm gbh in all the forest types. Anogeissus latifolia was the dominant species in the semi- evergreen and deciduous forest types while Chloroxylon swietenia was dominant in the thorn forest.
    [Show full text]
  • 36200 Yellow Wood, Old Fustic Recipe for Dyeing with Fustic
    36200 Yellow Wood, Old Fustic C.I. Natural Yellow 11 synonym: dyer´s mulberry german: Gelbholz, Fustik, geschnitten french: fustik, bois jaune Old fustik, or yellow wood, is derived from the heartwood of dyer's mulberry, a large, tropical tree (Chlorophora tinctoria, or Maclura tinctoria) of the mulberry family, Moraceae. The trees grow in South and Middle America, and in the warmer regions of North America. They also grow in Western India and in the Antilles. The climate in South Europe is not tropical, but it is warm enough for the Mulberry tree. Dye makers have used its bright yellow heartwood to make an effective dye. Yellow wood extract is made by cooking the wood. This is reddish-yellow and after diluting orange-yellow. Three different kinds of extracts are available: liquid extract (pale yellow – reddish-yellow), solid extract (yellow-brown – olive colored) containing about 15% water which is sold as cake or with about 5 % water which is sold as granules. The dye produces yellows on wool mordanted (fixed) with alaun. Brighter colors are reached with tin. Acidified lead oxide gives orange-yellow hues, chromium and copper salts give olive-green hues. Iron gives dark olive-green and black hues. Although the colors are not very light fast, yellow wood used to be very important for the manufacture of khaki-colored textiles. However, all colors are very fast to soap and alkalies. Recipe for dyeing with Fustic according to Gill Dably Ingredients 25% Alum 6% Washing Soda 100% Fustic Mordanting Dissolve the alum and the washing soda in cold water.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly
    UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL GENERAL A/AC.135/11/Add.l ASSEMBLY 13 August 1968 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH AD HCC COMMITTEE TO STUDY THE PEACEFUL USES OF THE SEA-BED AND THE CCEAN FLOOR BEYOND THE LIMITS OF NATIONAL JURISDICTION Third session SURVEY OF NATIONAL LEGISLATION CONCERNING THE SEA-BED AND THE OCEAN FLOOR, AND THE SUBSOIL THEREOF, UNDERLYING THE HIGH SEAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF PRESENT NATIONAL JURISDICTION Document prepared by the Secretariat I ... 68-17267 A/AC.135/11/Add.l English Page 2 CONTE1"TS Ifote . 3 I. Limits of the territorial sea. 5 II. Limits and scope of national jurisdiction over the continental shelf 9 1. Brazil. 10 2. Dahomey 11 3. Dcminican Republic 12 4. Guaterr:.ala 12 5. India 13 6. Iran 14 7, Ivory Coast . 15 8. IJicaragua . 15 9. Senegal 15 10. Spain . 16 11. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 20 12. Venezuela 23 III. Protection of submarine cables and pipelinesY IV. Prevention of pollution of the seaY V. Prohibition of broadcasting from ships, aircraft and marine structures y VI. List of national laws, orders and regulations comprising exploration and exploitation procedures and safety practices 25 y No additional information has been received by the United Nations Secretariat. I ... A/AC.135/11/Add.l English Page 3 NOTE The present document contains legislative texts recently provided or indicated by Governments in response to circular notes sent to them by the Secretary-General on 16 March 1967, 26 January 1968 and 9 April 1968. / ... A/AC.135/11/Add.l English Page 5 I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unified Plane Coordinate Reference System
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received COLVOCORESSES, Alden Partridge, 1918- A UNIFIED PLANE COORDINATE REFERENCE SYSTEM. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1965 Geography University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan A UNIFIED PLANE COORDINATE REFERENCE SYSTEM DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University Alden P. Colvocoresses, B.S., M.Sc. Lieutenant Colonel, Corps of Engineers United States Army * * * * * The Ohio State University 1965 Approved by Adviser Department of Geodetic Science PREFACE This dissertation was prepared while the author was pursuing graduate studies at The Ohio State University. Although attending school under order of the United States Army, the views and opinions expressed herein represent solely those of the writer. A list of individuals and agencies contributing to this paper is presented as Appendix B. The author is particularly indebted to two organizations, The Ohio State University and the Army Map Service. Without the combined facilities of these two organizations the preparation of this paper could not have been accomplished. Dr. Ivan Mueller of the Geodetic Science Department of The Ohio State University served as adviser and provided essential guidance and counsel. ii VITA September 23, 1918 Born - Humboldt, Arizona 1941 oo.oo.o BoS. in Mining Engineering, University of Arizona 1941-1945 .... Military Service, European Theatre 1946-1950 o . o Mining Engineer, Magma Copper
    [Show full text]
  • The Dravidian Languages
    THE DRAVIDIAN LANGUAGES BHADRIRAJU KRISHNAMURTI The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011–4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarc´on 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Bhadriraju Krishnamurti 2003 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2003 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeface Times New Roman 9/13 pt System LATEX2ε [TB] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0521 77111 0hardback CONTENTS List of illustrations page xi List of tables xii Preface xv Acknowledgements xviii Note on transliteration and symbols xx List of abbreviations xxiii 1 Introduction 1.1 The name Dravidian 1 1.2 Dravidians: prehistory and culture 2 1.3 The Dravidian languages as a family 16 1.4 Names of languages, geographical distribution and demographic details 19 1.5 Typological features of the Dravidian languages 27 1.6 Dravidian studies, past and present 30 1.7 Dravidian and Indo-Aryan 35 1.8 Affinity between Dravidian and languages outside India 43 2 Phonology: descriptive 2.1 Introduction 48 2.2 Vowels 49 2.3 Consonants 52 2.4 Suprasegmental features 58 2.5 Sandhi or morphophonemics 60 Appendix. Phonemic inventories of individual languages 61 3 The writing systems of the major literary languages 3.1 Origins 78 3.2 Telugu–Kannada.
    [Show full text]
  • Adeyemi Et Al., 2012)
    Ife Journal of Science vol. 15, no. 2 (2013) 303 A REVIEW OF THE TAXONOMY OF AFRICAN SAPINDACEAE BASED ON QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE CHARACTERS *Adeyemi, T.O., Ogundipe, O.T. and Olowokudejo, J.D. Department of Botany, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria. e-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] *Corresponding author: [email protected], +2348029180930 (Received: April, 2013; Accepted: June, 2013) ABSTRACT This study was conducted using qualitative and quantitative morphology to characterise and group different representative species of the family Sapindaceae in Africa. The morphological characters used included leaf, stem and fruit. Essentially, the similarities among various taxa in the family were estimated. A total of 28 genera and 106 species were assessed. Members possess compound leaves (paripinnate, imparipinnate or trifoliolate); flowers are in clusters, fruits occur as berry, drupe or capsule and contain seed with white or orange aril. UPGMA dendograms were generated showing relationships amongst taxa studied. The dendograms consists of a single cluster from 0 57 % similarity coefficients suggesting a single line decent of the members of the family. At 65 % two clusters were observed with Majidea fosterii being separated from the cluster. Also, at 67 % similarity coefficient, two clusters were discerned separating the climbing forms from the shrubby forms. Paullinia pinnata was separated from the other climbing forms at 67 % while Allophylus species were separated into two clusters at 91 % similarity coefficient. The dendograms revealed that the family can be separated into eleven (11) clusters based on qualitative morphological data. A key to the identification of genera is presented in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Prunus Africana Bark Exploitation Methods and Sustainable Exploitation in the South West, North-West and Adamaoua Regions of Cameroon
    GCP/RAF/408/EC « MOBILISATION ET RENFORCEMENT DES CAPACITES DES PETITES ET MOYENNES ENTREPRISES IMPLIQUEES DANS LES FILIERES DES PRODUITS FORESTIERS NON LIGNEUX EN AFRIQUE CENTRALE » Assessment of Prunus africana bark exploitation methods and sustainable exploitation in the South west, North-West and Adamaoua regions of Cameroon CIFOR Philip Fonju Nkeng, Verina Ingram, Abdon Awono February 2010 Avec l‟appui financier de la Commission Européenne Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... i ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................... ii Abstract .................................................................................................................. iii 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Problem statement ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 Research questions .......................................................................................... 2 1.4 Objectives ....................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Importance of the study ................................................................................... 3 2: Literature Review .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide
    National Core Field Guide, Version 5.1 October, 2011 FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL CORE FIELD GUIDE VOLUME I: FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR PHASE 2 PLOTS Version 5.1 National Core Field Guide, Version 5.1 October, 2011 Changes from the Phase 2 Field Guide version 5.0 to version 5.1 Changes documented in change proposals are indicated in bold type. The corresponding proposal name can be seen using the comments feature in the electronic file. • Section 8. Phase 2 (P2) Vegetation Profile (Core Optional). Corrected several figure numbers and figure references in the text. • 8.2. General definitions. NRCS PLANTS database. Changed text from: “USDA, NRCS. 2000. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 1 January 2000). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. FIA currently uses a stable codeset downloaded in January of 2000.” To: “USDA, NRCS. 2010. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 1 January 2010). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. FIA currently uses a stable codeset downloaded in January of 2010”. • 8.6.2. SPECIES CODE. Changed the text in the first paragraph from: “Record a code for each sampled vascular plant species found rooted in or overhanging the sampled condition of the subplot at any height. Species codes must be the standardized codes in the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) PLANTS database (currently January 2000 version). Identification to species only is expected. However, if subspecies information is known, enter the appropriate NRCS code. For graminoids, genus and unknown codes are acceptable, but do not lump species of the same genera or unknown code.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname
    Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen 67 CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed RAP (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Bulletin of Biological Assessment 67 Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION The RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment is published by: Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 Arlington, VA USA 22202 Tel : +1 703-341-2400 www.conservation.org Cover photos: The RAP team surveyed the Grensgebergte Mountains and Upper Palumeu Watershed, as well as the Middle Palumeu River and Kasikasima Mountains visible here. Freshwater resources originating here are vital for all of Suriname. (T. Larsen) Glass frogs (Hyalinobatrachium cf. taylori) lay their
    [Show full text]
  • Latitude and Longitude
    Latitude and Longitude Finding your location throughout the world! What is Latitude? • Latitude is defined as a measurement of distance in degrees north and south of the equator • The word latitude is derived from the Latin word, “latus”, meaning “wide.” What is Latitude • There are 90 degrees of latitude from the equator to each of the poles, north and south. • Latitude lines are parallel, that is they are the same distance apart • These lines are sometimes refered to as parallels. The Equator • The equator is the longest of all lines of latitude • It divides the earth in half and is measured as 0° (Zero degrees). North and South Latitudes • Positions on latitude lines above the equator are called “north” and are in the northern hemisphere. • Positions on latitude lines below the equator are called “south” and are in the southern hemisphere. Let’s take a quiz Pull out your white boards Lines of latitude are ______________Parallel to the equator There are __________90 degrees of latitude north and south of the equator. The equator is ___________0 degrees. Another name for latitude lines is ______________.Parallels The equator divides the earth into ___________2 equal parts. Great Job!!! Lets Continue! What is Longitude? • Longitude is defined as measurement of distance in degrees east or west of the prime meridian. • The word longitude is derived from the Latin word, “longus”, meaning “length.” What is Longitude? • The Prime Meridian, as do all other lines of longitude, pass through the north and south pole. • They make the earth look like a peeled orange. The Prime Meridian • The Prime meridian divides the earth in half too.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide Volume I: Field Data Collection Procedures for Phase 2 Plots
    National Core Field Guide, Version 6.0 October, 2012 FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL CORE FIELD GUIDE VOLUME I: FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR PHASE 2 PLOTS Version 6.0 National Core Field Guide, Version 6.0 October, 2012 Changes from the Phase 2 Field Guide version 5.1 to version 6.0 Changes documented in change proposals are indicated in bold type. The corresponding proposal name can be seen using the comments feature in the electronic file. These change pages are intended to highlight significant changes to the field guide and do not contain all of the details or minor changes. Introduction. Field Guide Layout. Made the following changes: Old text New text 0 General Description 0 General Description 1 Plot 1 Plot Level Data 2 Condition 2 Condition Class 3 Subplot 3 Subplot Information 4 Boundary 4 Boundary References 5 Tree Measurements 5 Tree Measurements and Sapling Data 6 Seedling 6 Seedling Data 7 Site Tree 7 Site Tree Information 8 Phase 2 Vegetation Profile (core 8 Phase 2 (P2) Vegetation Profile (core optional) optional) 9 Invasive Plants 9 Invasive Plants 10 Down Woody Materials 0.0 General Description. Paragraph 5, Defined NIMS (the National Information Management System). Also Figure 1. Figure 1 was replaced by a plot diagram including the annular ring. 0.2 Plot Integrity. Copied the following paragraph (as it appears in chapter 9) to the end of the section: “Note: Avoid becoming part of the problem! There is a risk that field crews walking into plot locations could pick up seeds along roadsides or other patches of invasive plants and spread them through the forest and on to the plot.
    [Show full text]