DOCSLIB.ORG

Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide National Core Field Guide, Version 5.1 October, 2011 FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL CORE FIELD GUIDE VOLUME I: FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR PHASE 2 PLOTS Version 5.1 National Core Field Guide, Version 5.1 October, 2011 Changes from the Phase 2 Field Guide version 5.0 to version 5.1 Changes documented in change proposals are indicated in bold type. The corresponding proposal name can be seen using the comments feature in the electronic file. • Section 8. Phase 2 (P2) Vegetation Profile (Core Optional). Corrected several figure numbers and figure references in the text. • 8.2. General definitions. NRCS PLANTS database. Changed text from: “USDA, NRCS. 2000. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 1 January 2000). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. FIA currently uses a stable codeset downloaded in January of 2000.” To: “USDA, NRCS. 2010. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 1 January 2010). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. FIA currently uses a stable codeset downloaded in January of 2010”. • 8.6.2. SPECIES CODE. Changed the text in the first paragraph from: “Record a code for each sampled vascular plant species found rooted in or overhanging the sampled condition of the subplot at any height. Species codes must be the standardized codes in the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) PLANTS database (currently January 2000 version). Identification to species only is expected. However, if subspecies information is known, enter the appropriate NRCS code. For graminoids, genus and unknown codes are acceptable, but do not lump species of the same genera or unknown code. For example, if several unknown CAREX species are present, only record the individual species present with cover of at least 3 percent.” To: “Record a code for each sampled vascular plant species found rooted in or overhanging the sampled condition of the subplot at any height. Species codes must be the standardized codes in the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) PLANTS database (currently January 2010 version). Identification to species only is expected. However, if subspecies information is known, enter the appropriate NRCS code. For graminoids, genus and unknown codes are acceptable, but do not lump species of the same genera or unknown code. For example, if several unknown CAREX species are present, only record the individual species present with cover of at least 3 percent.” • 9.9. SPECIES CODE. Changed the text in the first paragraph from: “Record the code for any species listed in appendix 9 that is found rooted in or overhanging (and rooted out of) the measured condition within the subplot. Species codes must be the standardized codes in the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) PLANTS database January 2000 version maintained by the FIA IM group (USDA, NRCS. 2000. The PLANTS database [http://plants.usda.gov/plants]. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874- 4490).” To: “Record the code for any species listed in appendix 9 that is found rooted in or overhanging (and rooted out of) the measured condition within the subplot. Species codes must be the standardized codes in the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) PLANTS database January 2010 version maintained by the FIA IM group (USDA, NRCS. 2010. The PLANTS database [http://plants.usda.gov/plants]. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874- 4490).” National Core Field Guide, Version 5.1 October, 2011 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Field Guide Layout .................................................................................................................................... 9 Units Of Measure ..................................................................................................................................... 10 0.0 General Description ....................................................................................................................... 11 0.1 Plot Setup ..................................................................................................................................... 12 0.2 Plot Integrity .................................................................................................................................. 13 1.0 Plot Level Data ............................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 STATE ....................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 COUNTY ................................................................................................................................... 14 1.3 PLOT NUMBER ........................................................................................................................ 14 1.4 PLOT STATUS .......................................................................................................................... 15 1.5 NONFOREST SAMPLING STATUS ......................................................................................... 15 1.6 NONFOREST PLOT STATUS .................................................................................................. 15 1.7 PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON .............................................................................................. 16 1.8 NONFOREST PLOT NONSAMPLED REASON ....................................................................... 17 1.9 SUBPLOTS EXAMINED ........................................................................................................... 17 1.10 SAMPLE KIND ...................................................................................................................... 17 1.11 PREVIOUS PLOT NUMBER ................................................................................................. 18 1.12 FIELD GUIDE VERSION ....................................................................................................... 18 1.13 CURRENT DATE .................................................................................................................. 18 1.13.1 YEAR ................................................................................................................................. 18 1.13.2 MONTH .............................................................................................................................. 19 1.13.3 DAY .................................................................................................................................... 19 1.14 DECLINATION (CORE OPTIONAL) ..................................................................................... 19 1.15 HORIZONTAL DISTANCE TO IMPROVED ROAD .............................................................. 19 1.16 WATER ON PLOT ................................................................................................................. 20 1.17 QA STATUS .......................................................................................................................... 20 1.18 CREW NUMBER ................................................................................................................... 21 1.19 GPS Coordinates ................................................................................................................... 21 1.19.1 GPS Unit Settings, Datum, and COORDINATE SYSTEM ................................................ 21 1.19.2 Collecting Readings ........................................................................................................... 21 1.19.3 GPS UNIT .......................................................................................................................... 22 1.19.4 GPS SERIAL NUMBER ..................................................................................................... 22 1.19.5 GPS ENTRY METHOD ..................................................................................................... 22 1.19.6 GPS DATUM ...................................................................................................................... 22 1.19.7 COORDINATE SYSTEM ................................................................................................... 23 1.19.8 Latitude .............................................................................................................................. 23 1.19.8.1LATITUDE DEGREES ........................................................................................................ 23 1.19.8.2 LATITUDE MINUTES ......................................................................................................... 23 1.19.8.3 LATITUDE SECONDS ....................................................................................................... 23 1.19.9 Longitude ........................................................................................................................... 24 1.19.9.1 LONGITUDE DEGREES .................................................................................................... 24 1.19.9.2 LONGITUDE MINUTES ..................................................................................................... 24 1.19.9.3 LONGITUDE SECONDS ................................................................................................... 24 1.19.10 UTM ZONE ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales
    Kingdom: Plantae Phylum: Tracheophyta Class: Magnoliopsida Order: Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales, Caryophyllales, Celastrales, Ericales, Fabales, Garryales, Gentianales, Lamiales, Laurales, Magnoliales, Malpighiales, Malvales, Myrtales, Oxalidales, Picramniales, Piperales, Proteales, Rosales, Santalales, Sapindales, Solanales Family: Achariaceae, Anacardiaceae, Annonaceae, Apocynaceae, Aquifoliaceae, Araliaceae, Bignoniaceae, Bixaceae, Boraginaceae, Burseraceae, Calophyllaceae, Canellaceae, Cannabaceae, Capparaceae, Cardiopteridaceae, Caricaceae, Caryocaraceae, Celastraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Clusiaceae, Combretaceae, Dichapetalaceae, Ebenaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Emmotaceae, Erythroxylaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Goupiaceae, Hernandiaceae, Humiriaceae, Hypericaceae, Icacinaceae, Ixonanthaceae, Lacistemataceae, Lamiaceae, Lauraceae, Lecythidaceae, Lepidobotryaceae, Linaceae, Loganiaceae, Lythraceae, Malpighiaceae, Malvaceae, Melastomataceae, Meliaceae, Monimiaceae, Moraceae, Myristicaceae, Myrtaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Ochnaceae, Olacaceae, Oleaceae, Opiliaceae, Pentaphylacaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Picramniaceae, Piperaceae, Polygonaceae, Primulaceae, Proteaceae, Putranjivaceae, Rhabdodendraceae, Rhamnaceae, Rhizophoraceae, Rosaceae, Rubiaceae, Rutaceae, Sabiaceae, Salicaceae, Sapindaceae, Sapotaceae, Simaroubaceae, Siparunaceae, Solanaceae, Stemonuraceae, Styracaceae, Symplocaceae, Ulmaceae, Urticaceae, Verbenaceae, Violaceae, Vochysiaceae Genus: Abarema, Acioa, Acosmium, Agonandra, Aiouea, Albizia, Alchornea,
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study on Latanye Broom Industry
    DEVELOPMENT OF THE LATANYÉ BROOM INDUSTRY IN SAINT LUCIA (WEST INDIES) Contributing Authors- Donatian Gustave, Lyndon John, Michael Andrew, Brent Charles, Margaret Severin, Monica Hyacinth, Lench Fevrier, Julius James, Anita James, Cornelius Isaac and Rebecca Rock. October 19 2006 1 Background Latanyé (Coccothrinax barbadensis) is a palm native to Saint Lucia. Its leaves are used to make craft and brooms. Latanyé is generally distributed throughout the Windward and Leeward Islands, including Trinidad and Tobago. Latanyé’s natural habitat ranges from “littoral and scrub woodlands near the coast, from sea level to 200 metres elevation”. (L. John 2001). The morphology of the leaves makes the plant resistant to strong wind currents. As it can grow on marginal soils, and appears to be tolerant against pests and diseases, Latanyé may be considered as an ideal plant for soil conservation works to reduce the rate of land degradation in St. Lucia. Figure 1 Photo of a Latanyé Plant Traditional Harvest of Latanyé Leaves In an ideal sustainable harvesting system, the older or mature Latanyé leaves are harvested and that the remainder of the plant regenerates and produces new leaves. 5 to 7 Latanyé leaves and a sturdy broom handle are used to make large brooms. (L. John 2001). Figure 2 illustrates how brooms are made. Figure 2 Phases in the production of a Latanyé Broom 1. Harvesting 2. Drying of Leaves 3. Preparation of Leaves 4) Tying leaves 5. Latanyé Broom (3- 5 days) Lyndon John (2001) described the broom industry in a socio economic context in 2001. The study revealed that Latanyé wild stocks were harvested “year round” to maintain livelihoods of rural people because of the available market and high demand for leaves for making brooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporton the Rare Plants of Puerto Rico
    REPORTON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO tii:>. CENTER FOR PLANT CONSERVATION ~ Missouri Botanical Garden St. Louis, Missouri July 15, l' 992 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Center for Plant Conservation would like to acknowledge the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the W. Alton Jones Foundation for their generous support of the Center's work in the priority region of Puerto Rico. We would also like to thank all the participants in the task force meetings, without whose information this report would not be possible. Cover: Zanthoxy7um thomasianum is known from several sites in Puerto Rico and the U.S . Virgin Islands. It is a small shrub (2-3 meters) that grows on the banks of cliffs. Threats to this taxon include development, seed consumption by insects, and road erosion. The seeds are difficult to germinate, but Fairchild Tropical Garden in Miami has plants growing as part of the Center for Plant Conservation's .National Collection of Endangered Plants. (Drawing taken from USFWS 1987 Draft Recovery Plan.) REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements A. Summary 8. All Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands Species of Conservation Concern Explanation of Attached Lists C. Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] species D. Blank Taxon Questionnaire E. Data Sources for Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [B] species F. Pue~to Rico\Virgin Islands Task Force Invitees G. Reviewers of Puerto Rico\Virgin Islands [A] and [8] Species REPORT ON THE RARE PLANTS OF PUERTO RICO SUMMARY The Center for Plant Conservation (Center) has held two meetings of the Puerto Rlco\Virgin Islands Task Force in Puerto Rico.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-Neotropical Genus Venada (Hesperiidae: Pyrginae) Is Not Monotypic: Four New Species Occur on One Volcano in the Area De Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica
    VOLUME 59, NUMBER 1 19 Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 59(1), 2005, 19–34 PAN-NEOTROPICAL GENUS VENADA (HESPERIIDAE: PYRGINAE) IS NOT MONOTYPIC: FOUR NEW SPECIES OCCUR ON ONE VOLCANO IN THE AREA DE CONSERVACIÓN GUANACASTE, COSTA RICA JOHN M. BURNS Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 127, room E-515, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA email: [email protected] AND DANIEL H. JANZEN Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Between 1995 and 2004, as part of an ongoing macrolepidopteran inventory of the Area de Conservación Gua- nacaste (ACG), Costa Rica, 327 adults of the hesperiid genus Venada were reared from 636 wild-caught caterpillars and pupae. Al- though Venada was thought to be monotypic over its wide range (Mexico to Bolivia), there are four new species on Volcán Cacao in the ACG: Venada nevada, V. daneva, V. cacao, and V. naranja — all described by Burns, using characters of adult facies, male and female genitalia, caterpillar color pattern, and ecologic distribution. These skippers inhabit both rain and cloud forest, but not dry forest. The caterpillars feed on mature leaves of saplings in five genera of Lauraceae: Beilschmiedia, Licaria, Nectandra, Ocotea, and Persea. Caterpillars of Ridens also eat plants in the family Lauraceae, and Ridens and Venada may be closely related. Additional key words: caterpillars, foodplants (Lauraceae), genitalia (male and female), parasitoids, taxonomy, variation. There are far more species of skipper butterflies in Oddly enough, adults of Venada and males of those the neotropics than current literature suggests.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article: Life History and Host Range of Prochoerodes Onustaria, an Unsuitable Classical Biological Control Agent of Brazilian Peppertree
    Biocontrol Science and Technology ISSN: 0958-3157 (Print) 1360-0478 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cbst20 Research article: life history and host range of Prochoerodes onustaria, an unsuitable classical biological control agent of Brazilian peppertree E. Jones & G. S. Wheeler To cite this article: E. Jones & G. S. Wheeler (2017) Research article: life history and host range of Prochoerodes onustaria, an unsuitable classical biological control agent of Brazilian peppertree, Biocontrol Science and Technology, 27:4, 565-580, DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2017.1325837 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2017.1325837 Published online: 16 May 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 24 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cbst20 Download by: [University of Florida] Date: 13 July 2017, At: 08:24 BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017 VOL. 27, NO. 4, 565–580 https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2017.1325837 Research article: life history and host range of Prochoerodes onustaria, an unsuitable classical biological control agent of Brazilian peppertree E. Jonesa,b and G. S. Wheelera aUSDA/ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA; bSCA/AmeriCorps, Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The life history and host range of the South American defoliator Received 13 January 2017 Prochoerodes onustaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) were examined Accepted 26 April 2017 to determine its suitability as a classical biological control agent of KEYWORDS the invasive weed Brazilian Peppertree, Schinus terebinthifolia,in Schinus terebinthifolia; the U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/07/2021 06:20:25PM Via Free Access 248 IAWA Journal, Vol
    IAWA Journal, Vol. 18 (3),1997: 247-259 WOOD ANATOMY OF SOME ANAUERIA AND BEILSCHMIEDIA SPECIES (LAURACEAE) 1 by Catia H. Callado & Cecilia G. Costa Anatomy Sector, Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Rua Jardim Botänico, 1008 Jardim Botänico, Rio de Janeiro, RJ / CEP 22400-000, Brazil SUMMARY The wood anatomy of the species Anaueria brasiliensis Kosterm., Beilschmiedia emarginata (Meissn.) Kosterm., B. rigida (Mez) Kosterm. and B. taubertiana (Schw. et Mez) Kosterm. (Lauraceae) is described. The taxonomy and ecology of these species, important components of the Amazonian forest or Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil, are discussed as related to wood anatomy. The main anatomical differences are: presence, type, arrangement and location of inorganic inclusions and secretory cells, and the arrangement of the axial parenchyma. Key words: Wood anatomy,Anaueria. Beilschmiedia, Lauraceae, taxon­ omy, ecology. INTRODUCTION Anaueria Kosterm. is amonotypic genus, with the single speciesA. brasiliensis Kosterm. (Kostermans 1938; Van der Werff 1991).1t was once (1957) included in Beilschmiedia by Kostermans, but is anatomically closer to Mezilaurus Taubert (Rohwer 1993). The genus Beilschmiedia Nees consists of about 250 species and is found through­ out the tropics (Rohwer 1993); six species occur in the Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil: Beilschmiedia angustifolia. B. emarginata. B. fluminensis. B. rigida. B. stricta and B. taubertiana. Three of these species were examined in this study. They were selected on the basis of availability of botanical material, whether fresh from the forest or through the exchange of wood sampies from collections in Brazil. Beilschmiedia rigida (Mez) Kosterm. and B. taubertiana (Schw. et Mez) Kosterm. are among the most important tree species at the Macae de Cima Munü;:ipal Ecological Reserve and the Parafso State Ecological Station (Relat6rio Tecnico do Programa Mata Atläntica do Jardim Botänico do Rio de Janeiro 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Keel, S. 2005. Caribbean Ecoregional Assessment Cuba Terrestrial
    CARIBBEAN ECOREGIONAL ASSESSMENT Cuba Terrestrial Report July 8, 2005 Shirley Keel INTRODUCTION Physical Features Cuba is the largest country in the Caribbean, with a total area of 110,922 km2. The Cuba archipelago consists of the main island (105,007 km2), Isla de Pinos (2,200 km2), and more than one thousand cays (3,715 km2). Cuba’s main island, oriented in a NW-SE direction, has a varied orography. In the NW the major mountain range is the Guaniguanico Massif stretching from west to east with two mountain chains of distinct geological ages and composition—Sierra de los Organos of ancient Jurassic limestone deposited on slaty sandstone, and Sierra del Rosario, younger and highly varied in geological structure. Towards the east lie the low Hills of Habana- Matanzas and the Hills of Bejucal-Madruga-Limonar. In the central part along the east coast are several low hills—from north to south the Mogotes of Caguaguas, Loma Cunagua, the ancient karstic range of Sierra de Cubitas, and the Maniabón Group; while along the west coast rises the Guamuhaya Massif (Sierra de Escambray range) and low lying Sierra de Najasa. In the SE, Sierra Maestra and the Sagua-Baracoa Massif form continuous mountain ranges. The high ranges of Sierra Maestra stretch from west to east with the island’s highest peak, Pico Real (Turquino Group), reaching 1,974 m. The complex mountain system of Sagua-Baracoa consists of several serpentine mountains in the north and plateau-like limestone mountains in the south. Low limestone hills, Sierra de Casas and Sierra de Caballos are situated in the northeastern part of Isla de Pinos (Borhidi, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Chec List What Survived from the PLANAFLORO Project
    Check List 10(1): 33–45, 2014 © 2014 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution What survived from the PLANAFLORO Project: PECIES S Angiosperms of Rondônia State, Brazil OF 1* 2 ISTS L Samuel1 UniCarleialversity of Konstanz, and Narcísio Department C.of Biology, Bigio M842, PLZ 78457, Konstanz, Germany. [email protected] 2 Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Campus José Ribeiro Filho, BR 364, Km 9.5, CEP 76801-059. Porto Velho, RO, Brasil. * Corresponding author. E-mail: Abstract: The Rondônia Natural Resources Management Project (PLANAFLORO) was a strategic program developed in partnership between the Brazilian Government and The World Bank in 1992, with the purpose of stimulating the sustainable development and protection of the Amazon in the state of Rondônia. More than a decade after the PLANAFORO program concluded, the aim of the present work is to recover and share the information from the long-abandoned plant collections made during the project’s ecological-economic zoning phase. Most of the material analyzed was sterile, but the fertile voucher specimens recovered are listed here. The material examined represents 378 species in 234 genera and 76 families of angiosperms. Some 8 genera, 68 species, 3 subspecies and 1 variety are new records for Rondônia State. It is our intention that this information will stimulate future studies and contribute to a better understanding and more effective conservation of the plant diversity in the southwestern Amazon of Brazil. Introduction The PLANAFLORO Project funded botanical expeditions In early 1990, Brazilian Amazon was facing remarkably in different areas of the state to inventory arboreal plants high rates of forest conversion (Laurance et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Contributions from the United States National Herbarium Volume 52: 1-415 Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands Editors Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez and Mark T. Strong Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 2005 ABSTRACT Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro and Mark T. Strong. Monocots and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, volume 52: 415 pages (including 65 figures). The present treatment constitutes an updated revision for the monocotyledon and gymnosperm flora (excluding Orchidaceae and Poaceae) for the biogeographical region of Puerto Rico (including all islets and islands) and the Virgin Islands. With this contribution, we fill the last major gap in the flora of this region, since the dicotyledons have been previously revised. This volume recognizes 33 families, 118 genera, and 349 species of Monocots (excluding the Orchidaceae and Poaceae) and three families, three genera, and six species of gymnosperms. The Poaceae with an estimated 89 genera and 265 species, will be published in a separate volume at a later date. When Ackerman’s (1995) treatment of orchids (65 genera and 145 species) and the Poaceae are added to our account of monocots, the new total rises to 35 families, 272 genera and 759 species. The differences in number from Britton’s and Wilson’s (1926) treatment is attributed to changes in families, generic and species concepts, recent introductions, naturalization of introduced species and cultivars, exclusion of cultivated plants, misdeterminations, and discoveries of new taxa or new distributional records during the last seven decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species of Beilschmiedia (Lauraceae) from Borneo
    BLUMEA 51: 89–94 Published on 10 May 2006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651906X622355 TWO NEW SPECIES OF BEILSCHMIEDIA (LAURACEAE) FROM BORNEO SACHIKO NISHIDA The Nagoya University Museum, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan e-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY Two new species of Beilschmiedia Nees (Lauraceae) from Borneo, B. crassa and B. microcarpa, are described and illustrated. Beilschmiedia crassa is distinguished from the other Bornean Beilschmiedia species by its thick and strongly coriaceous, narrowly ovate leaves and flowers with a thick receptacle. Beilschmiedia microcarpa is distinct in the combination of the following characters: its glabrous narrow buds, opposite, elliptic, chartaceous leaves with raised veins on the upper surface, flowers with short filaments, and relatively small fruits. Key words: Beilschmiedia, Lauraceae, Borneo, new species. INTRODUCTION Beilschmiedia Nees is one of the larger genera of Lauraceae (Nishida, 2001) and includes about 250 species distributed mainly in the paleotropics (Van der Werff, 2001). It is usually distinguished from the other Lauraceae genera by its paniculate or racemose inflorescences not strictly cymose at the terminal division, bisexual and trimerous flow- ers with six equal to subequal tepals, six to nine fertile stamens with 2-celled anthers, and fruits lacking cupules (Nishida, 1999). Revisional studies have been made for the genus in several regions: in China and Indochina (Liou, 1934), Taiwan (Liao, 1995), Congo and tropical Africa (Robyns & Wilczek, 1949), Cameroon (Fouilloy, 1974), Madagascar (Van der Werff, 2003), the neotropics (Kostermans, 1938; Nishida, 1999), New Zealand (Wright, 1984) and Australia (Hyland, 1989). However, the genus has still to be revised for the Flora Malesiana region, except for the fact that Kochummen (1989) treated the genus for the Tree Flora of Peninsular Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sfps Fall 2011 Sale Plant List
    SFPS FALL 2011 SALE PLANT LIST PLANTS VENDOR # Palms Acanthophoenix rubra 35 Acoelorrhaphe wrightii 26, 67 Acrocomia aculeata 50, 67 Actinokentia divaricata 35, 57, 66, 68, 72 Actinorhytis calapparia 72 Adonidia merrillii 31, 57, 66, 89 Adonidia merrillii var. "Golden Form" 35 Aiphanes aculeata = Aiphanes horrida - Aiphanes caryotifolia = Aiphanes horrida - Aiphanes erosa = Aiphanes minima - Aiphanes horrida 35, 68, 72 Aiphanes minima 68 Aiphanes vincentiana = Aiphanes minima - Allagoptera arenaria 57, 66, 67, 68, 72 Allagoptera campestris 67 Allagoptera leucocalyx 57 Alloschmidia glabrata = Basselinia glabrata - Alsmithia longipes = Heterospathe longipes - Archontophoenix cunninghamiana var. 'Illawara' 68 Archontophoenix maxima 67, 72 Archontophoenix myolensis 50, 66, 67, 68 Archontophoenix purpurea 57, 66, 72 Archontophoenix tuckeri 66, 68 Areca aliceae = Areca triandra - Areca camarinensis 57, 68 Areca catechu 57, 67, 72 Areca catechu var. 'Dwarf' 35, 50 Areca hutchinsoniana 68 Areca ipot 67 Areca latiloba = Areca montana - Areca macrocalyx var. 'Red Form' 35, 57, 68 Areca macrocarpa 68 Areca montana 57 Areca triandra 68, 72 Areca vestiaria 25, 35, 57, 67, 68 Areca vestiaria var. 'Orange Form' 25, 57, 67, 72 Areca vestiaria var. 'Maroon Leaf' 35, 57, 67 Areca vestiaria var. 'Red Leaf' 57, 67, 72 Areca sp. 'Yellow Crownshaft' 25 Arenga ambong = Arenga undulatifolia - Arenga brevipes 57 Arenga caudata 66 Arenga engleri 31, 66, 68, 72 Arenga hookeriana 35, 57, 66, 72 Arenga microcarpa 26, 66 Arenga obtusifolia 57, 66 PLANTS VENDOR # Arenga pinnata 50, 57, 66, 67, 68 Arenga porphyrocarpa 66 Arenga tremula 26, 57, 66, 68, 72 Arenga undulatifolia 35, 57, 66, 67 Arenga westerhoutii 68 Asterogyne martiana 57, 68, 72 Astrocaryum acaule 72 Astrocaryum alatum 35, 50, 57, 67 Astrocaryum mexicanum 72 Astrocaryum murumuru 72 Attalea butyracea 57, 67, 72 Attalea cohune 35 Attalea phalerata 50, 91 Attalea rostrata 68 Attalea speciosa 50, 66 Bactris bidentula 72 Bactris gasipaes 67 Bactris gasipaes var.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGY and HOST SPECIFICITY of Tectococcus
    BIOLOGY AND HOST SPECIFICITY OF Tectococcus ovatus (HEMIPTERA: ERIOCOCCIDAE), A POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT OF THE INVASIVE STRAWBERRY GUAVA, Psidium cattleianum (MYRTACEAE), IN FLORIDA By FRANCIS JAMES WESSELS IV A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005 Copyright 2005 by Frank J. Wessels This document is dedicated to my parents, for their support and generosity throughout my educational career. Without them, this work would not have been possible. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my major professor Dr. James P. Cuda for his invaluable guidance and help throughout my degree program. I also thank my other committee members, Dr. Kenneth A. Langeland and Dr. William A. Overholt, for their comments and suggestions on my research and this manuscript. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]