CHAPTER 1

NUBIA IN THE MEROITIC AND POSTMEROITIC PERIODS

Nubia is a geographic region located in the dering, the fi nds in the cemeteries show that the northeast corner of Africa [Figs 1–1, 3–1, 4–1, populations outside the centers were not without 7–1]. It encompasses the southern end of Egypt certain means and that some luxury objects and and northern , where it is divided other revenue from this trade benefi ted these into in the north and Upper groups (Säve-Söderbergh 1981: 3). The pyramids Nubia in the south. Diff erent regions within Nu- at Meroë, and some of the largest sites to the bia are separated by a series of cataracts, with the north, like Faras (Griffi th 1924: 1925), Karanog First Cataract being south of Aswan and the Sixth (Woolley and Randall McIver 1910), Qustul and Cataract north of modern Khartoum. The Classi- Ballaña (Williams 1991ab), and Abri (Vila 1982) cal historians often called the area south of Egypt demonstrate the common practice of extended ‘Ethiopia’, incorporating not only the modern burials in chambers accessed by sloping steps country of Ethiopia, but Lower and Upper Nubia or ramps, or in vertical shafts. The graves were and the lands beyond. The ancient Egyptian word marked by brick structures, mastabas or small for gold, nub, might be the origin for the name pyramids with ‘chapels’ or off ering niches, and since Nubia had the ancient world’s richest sup- were accompanied by inscribed or painted stele, ply of gold (Fisher 2012). off ering-tables and distinctive sculptures referred From the 3rd century BC until the 3rd century to as ‘ba-bird statues’. In the Meroitic heartlands, AD, Meroë with its great stone pyramid tombs at sites like Kadada and Gabati, grave superstruc- and their chapels became a center of the royal tures were rare and there were no off ering tables or and elite mortuary cult and a centre of the Nubi- inscriptions (Edwards 2004: 175). Meroitic graves an Kingdom of Meroë (Dunham 1957; 1963). The in Upper Nubia were covered with tumuli or not Kingdom of Meroë probably extended as far south marked in any particular way (El Tayeb 2012). as the confl uence of the Blue and White In general, the deceased were accompanied by and beyond, and in the north, Lower Nubia be- grave goods ranging from richly furnished royal came the intermediary with Egypt. The location burials to the simplest forms, accompanied only of Meroë also made it the nodal point for travels by pottery jars and cups (Adams 1977: 374–375; east to the Red Sea, south to Ethiopia, and far- Edwards 2004: 174). The Kingdom of Aksum con- ther into sub-Saharan Africa (Fisher 2012: 37–40). quered the Meroitic kingdom in the early 4th cen- While the Ptolemies and Kushites interacted in tury AD. Pyramid and mastaba superstructures Lower Nubia, trade was renewed in the Ptolemaic then disappeared, to be replaced by the wide- Red Sea ports of Berenike Trogodytica and Ptole- spread use of tumuli. Further changes have been mais Theron. The Meroitic people from the south noted in material culture (Edwards 2004). eventually settled along the Nile in Lower Nubia. Three entities emerged between the 4th and Diff erent tribal groups lived in the area west and 6th centuries AD after the fall of Meroë: Noba- east of the Nile, and near the Red Sea. Lower Nu- dia in Lower Nubia, Early in Upper Nu- bia, for a time ruled by Rome in the north and bia, and Alwa () in the region up from the Meroë in the south, became very prosperous in Fifth Cataract. Once the Romans had withdrawn the 1st to 4th centuries AD. Despite heavy plun- from Lower Nubia around AD 298, the Nobadians,

PAM Monograph Series 10 11 Joanna Then-Obłuska

Fig. 1–1. Map of Nubia

12 PAM Monograph Series 10 Chapter 1 – Nubia in the Meroitic and post-Meroitic periods

possibly from the Western Desert, and the Blem- Nobadian royal and elite cemetery at Qustul is myes from the Eastern Desert encroached on the dated to around AD 370–380, while that at Bal- area (Strouhal 1984; Ricke 1967). The Blemmyes laña dates to around AD 420 (Emery and Kirwan are well attested in the written sources, and they 1938; Farid 1963). The largest of the great tumuli and other groups occupied the region of the em- was nearly 80 m in diameter and 12 m high. Sev- erald and beryl mines at Mons Smaragdus in the eral had multi-chambered substructures to con- Eastern Desert (e.g., Dijkstra 2012). However, the tain the burial and its abundant grave goods. The ethnic term “Blemmye” needs to be used with care kings were buried with their regalia, including sil- since it probably included a wide variety of people ver crowns, and spears and other military equip- living between the Red Sea and the Nile Valley ment. Imported materials including metal ves- (Dijkstra 2012). The presence of these Eastern sels, items of furniture, horse harnesses, wooden Desert dwellers in the Nile Valley is marked by boxes with ivory inlays, game boards and gaming Eastern Desert Ware, which is found in the East- pieces, toilet articles, and a large quantity of pot- ern Desert as far as the Egyptian Red Sea ports tery, not the least Mediterranean amphorae, were of Berenike, Marsa Nakari, and Quseir to the probably used in the funerary rituals. A great deal northeast, and the Fifth Cataract region in Sudan of beadwork and jewellery was also buried with to the south (Barnard 2006; 2008; Barnard and them. Magid 2006). Additionally, their tumulus graves Following excavations in the south, at Tan- are found on the west and east banks of the Lower qasi, Hammur, and El-Hobagi (e.g., Shinnie 1954; Nubian Nile Valley at Kalabsha and Wadi Qitna, Żurawski 2000; Lenoble et al. 1994; Lenoble 2004b), where they date to the mid-4th century AD, i.e., it was assumed that these tumulus cemeteries were about AD 330/340–370/380 (Ricke 1967; Strouhal counterparts to the Nobadian cemeteries at Qus- 1984; Williams 1991b:12). tul and Ballaña. Royal burials in the Early Maku- The Nobadian king Silko conquered the rian region have not been identifi ed until recently. Blemmyes in the mid-5th century AD and the early Nevertheless, the recent fi nds of ornaments and

Table 1–1. General chronology of Egypt, Lower Nubia, Upper Nubia and Central Sudan (after Fisher et al. 2012; El-Tayeb 2013; Williams 1991; Welsby and Anderson 2004)

Central Egypt Lower Nubia Upper Nubia Abbreviation Sudan Late Period Napatan Napatan N Napatan ~722–332 BC (Dynasties 25–30) Ptolemaic Period Early Meroitic Early Meroitic EM Meroitic ~400–200 BC Classic ~100 BC–AD Early Roman Classic Meroitic Classic Meroitic M Meroitic 200 Late Late Meroitic LM ~AD 200–300 Meroitic Late Roman Late Meroitic Transitional Late Meroitic to Early LM/PM ~AD 250–350 Makuria Post Early Makuria Meroitic Phase I (Early EPM ~AD 350–450 Post–Meroitic)

Byzantine Early Nobadian/ Early Makuria (AD 395–640) Post–Meroitic Phase II (Late LPM ~AD 450–550 Post–Meroitic) Alwa Early Makuria TPM ~AD 550–600 (Terminal Phase) Christian Islamic Period Christian Nobadia Christian Makuria Ch AD 641–1400 Alwa

PAM Monograph Series 10 13 Joanna Then-Obłuska

adornments at el-Zuma has now provided evi- dian in Lower Nubia (e.g., Obłuski 2014), and Early dence of the royal character of the decorated ob- Makurian in Upper Nubia (El-Tayeb 2012). Chris- jects found in these tombs (Then-Obłuska 2017c). tianized Nobadia and Makuria were united under The post-Meroitic period in Lower Nubia was a Makurian king by the early 7th century AD (Fish- previously called the X-Group (4th–6th centuries er 2012: 39). Table 1–1 presents the general chro- AD). But due to the state formation process oc- nology of Egypt, Lower Nubia, Upper Nubia, and curring at that time, it is now called Early Noba- Central Sudan during the periods discussed here.

14 PAM Monograph Series 10