DOCSLIB.ORG

Possible Oil and Gas Fields in the Cretaceous Beds of Alabama

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

424 OIL AND GAS FIELDS IN THE CRETACEOUS BEDS OF ALABAMA Possible Oil and Gas Fields in the Cretaceous Beds of Alabama BY DORSEY HAGER, * TULf\A, OKI,A. (New York Meeting, February, 1918) Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/TRANS/article-pdf/59/01/424/2176944/spe-918424-g.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 THE possibility of oil and gas production in Alabama has been little considered as yet. Gas and some oil have been found in northwestern Alabama, near Birmingham, in the Pennsylvanian beds, but the oil and gas possibilities in the Cretaceous beds are not generally appreciated. The recent activity of oil companies in that State has attracted much attention, and in this paper the main structural and the general strati­ graphic features are described. :Four favorable areas are outlined. These contain folds of major interest. 'there are other favorable areas which have not been mapped,l Commercial pools discovered in this area would have the advantage of being near tidewater. Mobile, Ala., on the Gulf of Mexico, would be the logical site for refineries and shipping facilities. A pipe line could readily be laid to that city from the Hatchitigbee and the Jackson areas. The logical outlet for the Geneva and the Gordon areas would be Panama City, ma., on the Gulf of Mexico. TOPOGRAPHY The whole of the area under consideration lies in the Gulf coastal· plain and slopes gently to the southwest and west. The elevations vary from 200 to 400 ft. (60 to 121 m.) above sea level. The streams have . sunk their channels into this gently sloping plain, the main drainage flowing south or southwest into tho Gulf of Mexico. Between the * Petroleum Geologist and Engineer, 1 The writer owes acknowledgments to: Eugene Smith, of the Geological Survey of Alabama, who described the Hatchetig. bee anticline in Water Resources of Alabama, whose general r~sum6 on the stratigmphy of Alabama has been used extensively. Lloyd William Stephenson, whose Professional Paper 81, U. S. Geological Survey, "Cretaceous Deposits of the Eastern Gulf Region," has been freely used for his descriptions and correlations. Lee Hager, of Houston, Tex., who first called the writer's attention to the Hatchi· tigbee anticline, and mapped the fold 10 years ago. Wm. C. Spooner and J. R. Jillson, geologists in the employ of the firm of which the writer is a member, who made the reconnaissance surveys of the Jackson, Geneva, and Gordon folds. Field work was commenced in June, 1916, and eompleted in July, 1917. DORSEY HAGER 425 streams are found remnants of.this plain, constituting the hills of the area. The relief varies from a few feet up to 150 ft. in certain parts. The country is generally covered by timber. STRATIGRAPHY The thickness in the generalized sections presented must be considered largely as estimates, especially the thicknesses of the underlying Cre­ taceous beds, as no wells have been drilled deep enough to give good type sections. The Cretaceous sections mentioned were secured at the outcrop Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/TRANS/article-pdf/59/01/424/2176944/spe-918424-g.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 nnd in water wells at shallow depths. }Lway from the old shoreline of the Cretaceous, it is very likely that the beds thicken southward. The comparative relations in Table 3 show the general correlation of the Louisiana and the Alabama formations. TABLE L-Generalized Geologic Section of We8tern Alabama ThiCk-I' Geologic Age··1 Group I Format'ion Name I ness, Character I Ft. Pliocene­ I I Lafayette 25 Gravel, sands, clays Pleistocene 1-----1 - ------ , Lower Miocene I I Grand Gulf 50 I Soft sandstones and ,clays ~,:wer Oligocene -----1 St. Stephens lime- -300 II Unusually soft limestone, . stone. easily cut with saw --------------- --------- --- - Claiborne /Gosport greensand 30 I Glauconitic sandS, . Lisbon ·U5 Calcareous clays and sandy clay . I Tallahatta buhr- 400 I Aluminous sandstones and stone siliceous clays ------------1- I Hatchetigbee 175 Sandy clays and cross- bedded sands Chickasaw Bashi 80 Sands and clays. Fossil- Eocene I (Wilcox) iferous green sand Tuscahoma 140 Gray and yellow cross- I. bedded sands _ _~~~~~~lia ___ 200 Siliceous clays _____ Naheola 150 Gray sandy clays. Glau- 1 conitic clays Midway Sucarnochee clay 100 I Dark-brown clay -------- ----- Clayton --I50 I Impure limestone I Ripley 300 Calcareous and siliceous sands Splma chalk 1 Upper 950 Argillaceous limestones Eutaw sands 500 Glauconitic sands, cross­ Cretaceous bedded Tuscaloosa 1 1,000 I Irregular bedded sands, I clays, and gravels . 426 OIL AND. GAS FIELDS IN THE CRETACEOUS BEDS OF ALABAMA TABLE 2.-Generalized Geologic Section oj Eastern Alabama ThiOk-1 ___GeOIO_gi_O A_g_e_-7-- _____--'I,----F_o_r_m,"t!on Name I' nF~~' Character Pliocene­ i Lafay-~t:--- I }50 II River terrace sands and Pleistocene ____1 _______1' ___ gravels ____~_ Lower Miocene 'iGrand Gulf 50 Argillaceous Aluminous fine white sands, clays -----------------1 Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/TRANS/article-pdf/59/01/424/2176944/spe-918424-g.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 Lower Oligocene St. Stephens II 90 \Siliccous limestone and gray- 1 ,1---' blue sands _ --------i-C-la-I·-b-o-rn-e--I , LisbonGosport greensand 1 } 150 Gl aUCOlll't' IC san d s TaUahatta buhr-I 200, Calcareous sandstones, f08- stone 'sil.iferous Eocene i i Hatchetigbee I ~ Limestones and clays Chickasaw i Bashi I 80 Sands and clays 1 (Wilcox) Tuscahoma 175 Gray and yellow sandstones I Nanafalia ~,~,JSandY clays, fossiliferous IMidway Clayton i 200 i Limestones, fossiliferous ---------1------ Ripley kooo I-BlUe_gray calcareous sands and yellow calcareous hard 1 l sandstones Eutaw I 150 Yellow green sands, clays, Upper I I cap of phosphatic calcare­ Cretaceous ous sand and rotten lime­ I stone Tuscaloosa: 150 Purple, gray, red laminated clay, ¥ariegated colored sands, chert pebbles II I TABLE a.-Comparative Geologic Section Geologic Age I Alabama Louisiana· ----------------------- Calibome groUp ......... " .. \ Claiborne group Eocene Wilcox group ................ 1 Wilcox formation Midway group .............. Midway formation . { Arkadelphia clay Ripley formatIOn... .. Nacotoch sand (gas sand) ----------------- --,-_._------------ Marlbrook marl Upper Cretaceous Selma chalk............... "1 Ann,ona chalk IBrownstown marl Eutaw formation .....•....•. Eagle Ford clay Tuscaloosa formation ....... , Woodbine forma.tion (Caddo oil horizon) DORSEY HAGER 427 A study of the Tertiary formations from Louisiana to Alabama shows that these formations preserve their main characteristics, though pre­ senting many variations in thickness. The Cretaceous, on the pther hand, sho:ws numerous changes in the character of the formation. J Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/TRANS/article-pdf/59/01/424/2176944/spe-918424-g.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 GEOtOGIO S~ETGH MAP of ALABAMA Showing pro&pecl"ive area~ favorable for. oil aod gas accumutatlon. Legend. ~ v ~t~ Stewns L.ime~!g~ !l QIJ Jj Glaibor" { GO Gh<k,,,. IWil~\ &Midr'Y' lTI RIII;Y ~ SeM8;! I Serna 0 elk E [EJ <:>{ Eutaw Sand s ~ Tuscaloosa Formation 'CIJ Osrhonifenftls i 1~,o·1 I Pre..(;arbQt1if'e~o~s ! HafGhed area' showing prosp~tivt pools; \ f- H8tchitigbe~ ! florida I Nebil. '2.·Jackson 3-6eneva A.- 6ordon ,<I- Oil ar gas shows~ Hager Bates Il;Kemp. ~GUlf OF MEXIGO Tulsa Okla. FIG. 1. The larger portion of the area is unconformably overlain by the Grand Gulf formation, and all of the area by the Lafayette formation, of post-Tertiary age. These formations consist of thin-bedded and massive clays of varying colors, interstratified with sands, the latter in many places indurated or hardened to form sandstones. The St. Stephens limestone constitutes the uppermost member of the Eocene in 428 OIL AND GAS FIELDS IN THE CRETACEOUS BEDS OF ALABAMA this area, and is the equivalent, in part, of the Vicksburg and, in part, of the Jackson limestone in Mississippi. In Alabama, it is difficult to differentiate these two formations. The limestones show many varia­ tions, being in some cases hard, almost crystalline, and of a variety of colors. Commonly the rock is soft, easily cut with an ax or saw, and is popularly known as "chimney rock." This formation has a thickness of between 200 and 300 ft. (60 and 91 m.), and is fossiliferous at certain horizons. Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/TRANS/article-pdf/59/01/424/2176944/spe-918424-g.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 The Gosport greensand is a highly glauconitic sand, about 30 ft. (9 m.) in thickness, and is characteristic in this area. This sand abounds in characteristic fossils and is a reliable horizon marker all the way across the State. The Lisbon formation comes below the Gosport sand and has a thickness of about 115 ft. (35 m.), consisting of calcareous clayey sands and sandy clays, generally fossiliferous. In the western part of the. State, the most prominent rocks of the Tallahatta buhrstone forma­ tion are argillaceous sandstones and siliceous claystones, always poor in fossils. To the east, the clays decrease and the rocks become calcareous and richer in fossils. This formation varies from 400 ft. thick in the western part of the State to 200 ft. in the eastern part. All these forma­ tions belong to the Claiborne group of the Eocene. The Wilcox group is made up of Hatchetigbee, Bashi, Tuscahoma, and Nanafalia formations. The Hatchetigbee is the uppermost formation of the group and consists of about 175 ft. (53 m.) of brown, purple, and gray laminated sandy clay and cross-bedded sands, abounding in fossils. This formation extends to the east and maintains its characteristics. The Bashi formation, about 80 ft. (24 m.) thick, is composed of sands and clays. It is distinguished by a bed of highly fossiliferous greensand, with associated beds of lignite immediately below it.
Recommended publications
  • B-50 Geology of the Coastal Plain of East Central Georgia

    B-50 Geology of the Coastal Plain of East Central Georgia

    GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN NUMBER 50- PART 1 GEOLOGY OF THE COASTAL PLAIN OF EAST-CENTRAL GEORGIA By PHILIP E. LA MOREAUX Geologist United States Geological Survey Published in cooperation with United States Department of Interior, Geological Survey, Washing.ton, D. C. ATLANTA 1946 I LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY ATLANTA, February 15, 1946. His Excellency, Ellis Arnall, Governor Commissioner Ex-Officio, State Division of Conservation Through The Honorable Nelson M. Shipp, Assistant Commissioner SIR: I have the honor to submit herewith Georgia Geological Survey Bulletin No. 50, Part I, "Geology of the Coastal Plain of East-Central Georgia." This is the first in a series of bulletins under this title. Others will be published from time to time until all of the Cretaceous area in the State has been mapped. The geology of east central Georgia, the area covered in this report, influences in three essential ways the economy of the State: The Tuscaloosa formation consists of thick beds of sand and gravel that are excellent aquifers. These water-bearing beds will furnish large additional quantities of water of good quality for industrial and municipal uses throughout a belt of 10 to 30 miles in width along the northern mar­ gin of the Coastal Plain of Georgia. Georgia produces approximately 80 per cent of the national output of kaolin. The major portion of this production is from deposits described in this report in Washington, Wilkinson a:nd Twiggs counties. Other com­ mercial minerals mined in this area include bauxite, fuller's earth, lime­ stone, and sand and gravel.
  • Permophiles Issue #58 November 2013 EXECUTIVE NOTES Notes from the SPS Secretary Museum of Natural History and Science, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, May 20-22, 2013

    Permophiles Issue #58 November 2013 EXECUTIVE NOTES Notes from the SPS Secretary Museum of Natural History and Science, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, May 20-22, 2013

    Table of Contents Notes from the SPS Secretary 1 Lucia Angiolini Notes from the SPS Chair 2 Shuzhong Shen Subcommission on Permian Stratigraphy Annual Report 2013 3 Shuzhong Shen, SPS Chairman Officers and Voting Members since August, 2012 5 The Reality of GSSPs 6 Stanley C. Finney GSSPs (Global Stratotype Section and Point) and Correlation 8 Stanley C. Finney We Need a New GSSP for the Base of the Permian 8 Spencer G. Lucas The GSSP at the Aidaralash section is solid and has no alternative 13 Vladimir I. Davydov The Aidaralash GSSP—Reply to Davydov 15 Spencer G. Lucas Proposal for the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base-Sakmarian Stage (Lower Permian) 16 Valery V. Chernykh, Boris I. Chuvashov, Shuzhong Shen andCharles M. Henderson Proposal for the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base-Artinskian Stage (Lower Permian) 26 Boris I. Chuvashov, Valery V. Chernykh, Shuzhong Shen and Charles M. Henderson Report of the Chinese, Iranian, Italian working group: The Permian-Triassic boundary sections of Julfa and Zal revisited 34 Lucia Angiolini, Shuzhong Shen, Maryamnaz Bahrammanesh, Syrus Abbasi, Mina Birjandi, Gaia Crippa, Dongxun Yuan and Claudio Garbelli Age assignment of section 4 of Teichert et al. (1973) at Ali Bashi Mountains (Julfa, NW Iran) 36 Abbas Ghaderi, Ali Reza Ashouri, Heinz W. Kozur and Dieter Korn Report of field excursions 2012/2013 of the “Sino-German Cooperation Group on the Late Palaeozoic Palaeobiology, Stratigraphy and Geochemistry” between Europe and China 40 Jun Wang, Shuzhong Shen, Joerg W. Schneider and Hans Kerp ANNOUNCEMENTS 42 SUBMISSION GUIDELINES FOR ISSUE 59 44 Photo 1: The Permian-Triassic succession of the Ali Bashi Mountains, Julfa, NW Iran.
  • Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Ag,E @F T the Claibornian Stage

    Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Ag,E @F T the Claibornian Stage

    The Eocene TaJJahatta Formation of Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Ag,e @f t The Claibornian Stage U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1615 The Eocene Tallahatta Formation of Alabama and Georgia: Its Lithostratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Bearing on the Age of The Claibornian Stage By laurel M. Bybell and Thomas G. Gibson U.S. GEOlOGICAl SURVEY BUllETIN 1615 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1985 For sale by the Distribution Branch, Text Products Section U.S. Geological Survey 604 South Pickett St. Alexandria, VA 22304 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bybell, Laurel M. The Eocene Tallahatta Formation of Alabama and Georgia. <U.S. Geological Survey bulletin; 1615) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.3:1615 1. Geology, Stratigraphic--Eocene. 2. Geology--Alabama. 3. Geology-­ Georgia. I. Gibson, Thomas G. II. Title. III. Series. QE75.B9 no. 1615 557.3 s [551.7'84] 84-600098 [QE692.2] CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and scope 1 Acknowledgments 2 Lithostratigraphy 2 Biostratigraphy 7 Paleoenvironmental analysis 15 The Tallahatta and the age of the Claibornian Stage 17 Conclusions 18 References cited 18 PLATES [Plates follow references cited] 1. Discoaster, Tribrachiatus, Helicosphaera, Rhabdosphaera, Transversopontis, Cyclococcolithus, and Reticulofenestra 2. Reticulofenestra, Blackites, Chiasmolithus, Lophodolithus, Transversopontis, Ellipsolithus, Discoaster, Campylosphaera, and Zygrhablithus FIGURES 1. Map showing localities in Alabama and western Georgia discussed in text 2 2. Correlation chart showing age placements for the Tallahatta and other formations of late Paleocene to middle Eocene age in Alabama and Georgia 3 3.
  • Southeastern Part of the Texas Coastal Plain

    Southeastern Part of the Texas Coastal Plain

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 335 GEOLOGY AND UNDERGROUND WATERS OF THE SOUTHEASTERN PART OF THE TEXAS COASTAL PLAIN BY ALEXANDER DEUSSEN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 13 Physiography.............................................................. 14 General character..................................................... 14 Topographic features.................................................. 16 Relief............................................................ 16 Coast prairie.................................................. 16 Kisatchie Wold............................................... 16 Nacogdoches Wold............................................ 16 Corsicana Cuesta and White Rock Escarpment................... 18 Bottom lands................................................. 18 Mounds and pimple plains...................................... 19 Drainage.......................................................... 19 Timber............................................................... 21 General geologic features................................................... 21 Relation of geology to the occurrence of underground water............... 21 Principles of stratigraphy.............................................. 22 Erosion and sedimentation.......................................... 22 The geologic column.............................................. 22 Subdivision
  • HGS Bulletin Volume 47 No.8

    HGS Bulletin Volume 47 No.8

    GE OL N O O G T I S C U A O L H 1923 HGSBulletin Volume 47 Number 8 Houston Geological Society April 2005 The Trident Discovery: Th Play Opener of the ru st Perdido Foldbelt, Fa ult ed Deepwater Northwestern Rid Gulf of Mexico ge Page 23 \ P la te B T o h u ru n s d t a F r a y u l te d R id g e S n lid o y e n S a c C ar Indian Ocean Seafloor near the Site of the December 26, 2004 Sumatra Earthquake GE OL N O O G T I S C U A O L The H 1923 Bulletin Houston Geological Society Volume 47, Number 8 April 2005 In Every Issue Technical Meetings 5 From the President 23 HGS General Dinner Meeting by Steve Levine The Trident Discovery: Play Opener of the Perdido 9 From the Editor Foldbelt, Deepwater Northwestern Gulf of Mexico by Arthur Berman 25 HGS International Explorationists Dinner Meeting 34 GeoEvents Calendar Constraining Geological Heterogeneity in Offshore 61 Webnotes Sarawak Field, East Malaysia: Implications for Stochastic Modeling. HGA/GeoWives 64 27 GSH Luncheon Meeting 65 Professional The Northern Sumatra Earthquake of 2004: Forty Directory Years of Ignoring Plate Tectonics about the cover: Indian Ocean sea floor near 29 HGS Northsiders Luncheon Meeting the site of the December 26 2004 Sumatra earthquake along India-Australia/Eurasian Advances in Hydrographic Systems Aid Hydrocarbon plate boundary. Exploration and Geohazard Evaluation Cover image supplied courtesy of the Royal Navy, UK Hydrographic Office and CARIS©.
  • Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]

    Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]

    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
  • Structural Framework of the Mississippi Embayment of Southern Illinois ^

    Structural Framework of the Mississippi Embayment of Southern Illinois ^

    <Olo£ 4.GV- Su&O&Ml STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK OF THE MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS ^ Dennis R. Kolata, Janis D. Treworgy, and John M. Masters f^a>i^ < Illinois Institute of Natural Resources STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION CIRCULAR 516 Jack A. Simon, Chief 1981 . COVER PHOTO: Exposure of Mississippian limestone along the Post Creek Cutoff in eastern Pulaski County, Illinois. The limestone is overlain (in ascending order) by the Little Bear Soil and the Gulfian (late Cretaceous) Tuscaloosa and McNairy Formations. Cover and illustrations by Sandra Stecyk. Kolata, Dennis R. Structural framework of the Mississippi Embayment of southern Illinois / by Dennis R. Kolata, Janis D. Treworgy, and John M. Masters. — Champaign, III. : State Geological Survey Division, 1981 — 38 p. ; 28 cm. (Circular / Illinois. State Geological Survey Division ; 516) 1. Geology — Mississippi Embayment. 2. Geology, Structural — Illinois, Southern. 3. Mississippi Embayment. I. Treworgy, Janis D. II. Masters, John M. III. Title. IV. Series. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ILLINOIS STATE Printed by authority of State of Illinois (3,000/1981) 5018 3 3051 00003 STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK OF THE MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS -*** t**- ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 516 Natural Resources Building 1981 615 East Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/structuralframew516kola CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 1 METHOD OF STUDY 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING
  • Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955

    Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955

    Geologic Names of North America Introduced in 19364955 ^GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A Names of North America Introduced in 1936-1955 By DRUID WILSON, WILLIAM J. SANDO? and RUDOLPH W. KOPF Prepared with the assistance of BARBARA BEDETTE, JEAN L. EGGLETON, GRACE C. KEROHER, CAROLYN MANN, WILLIAM G. MELTON, JR., KATHERINE DENNISON PALMER, and JACK E. SMEDLEY GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA -G E O L O G I C AL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-A A compilation of new geologic names of North America, including Greenland, the finest Indies, the Pacific Island pos­ sessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director ' For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1. (paper cover) FOEEWOBD The "Lexicon of geologic names of the United States" by M. Grace Wilmarth, published in 1938 and reprinted in 1951 and 1957, met a long standing need and continuing demand for a compilation of geologic names. Plans made for future compilations as new names and revisions appeared were interrupted during the years of World War II. In 1952 a sustained effort was begun toward review of geo­ logic publications necessary to furnish a background for preparation of a new edition. After the review was brought up to date in 1956, the present compilation was prepared in order to furnish to the geo­ logic profession, as quickly as possible, some of the essential data concerning the new names that have appeared since 1935.
  • A New Elasmobranch Assemblage from the Early Eocene (Ypresian) Fishburne Formation of Berkeley County, South Carolina, USA

    A New Elasmobranch Assemblage from the Early Eocene (Ypresian) Fishburne Formation of Berkeley County, South Carolina, USA

    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences A new elasmobranch assemblage from the early Eocene (Ypresian) Fishburne Formation of Berkeley County, South Carolina, USA Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2015-0061.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 30-Aug-2015 Complete List of Authors: Case, Gerard R.; P.O. Box 664, Cook, ToddDraft D.; University of Alberta Wilson, Mark V. H.; University of Alberta, Biological Sciences Keyword: Elasmobranch, Eocene, Ypresian, Palaeobiogeography, Palaeoecology https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Page 1 of 64 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences A new elasmobranch assemblage from the early Eocene (Ypresian) Fishburne Formation of Berkeley County, South Carolina, USA Gerard R. Case, Todd D. Cook, and Mark V. H. Wilson Gerard R. Case. 1 P.O. Box 664, Little River, SC 29566, USA, [email protected] Todd D. Cook. School of Science, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, 4205 College Drive, Erie, PA, 16563, USA [email protected] Mark V. H. Wilson. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada; [email protected]. 1Corresponding author. https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 64 A new elasmobranch assemblage from the early Eocene (Ypresian) Fishburne Formation of Berkeley County, South Carolina, USA Gerard R. Case, Todd D. Cook, and Mark V. H. Wilson Abstract A rich elasmobranch assemblageDraft was recovered from the early Eocene (Ypresian) Fishburne Formation in a limestone quarry at Jamestown, Berkeley County, South Carolina, USA. Reported herein are 22 species belonging to eight orders, at least 15 families, and 21 genera.
  • Bedrock Geology of Paducah Nequadrangle

    Bedrock Geology of Paducah Nequadrangle

    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF PADUCAH NE QUADRANGLE Illinois Department of Natural Resources Illinois Geologic Quadrangle Map ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MASSAC AND POPE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS IGQ Paducah NE-BG William W. Shilts, Chief F. Brett Denny and W. John Nelson 2005 A Km Mts Msb Qc Km Mgd Mgd Mgd Mm BARNES CREEK QTm Qc FAULT ZONE Mpo 15 Mgd 67.5 6 QTm Km 15 Qc 78 4 Msb Mts EXPLANATION Qc E Msb N Mts Mps O QTm Z Mh T Qc Km Mts L Cahokia Formation U Mwb A Qm F Holocene Y 5 Qc T 32 I Cahokia overlying 594 Mpo C 10 Qc/e Msb Equality Formation Qc Y 4 12 Mm A B Qc Mgd Qc Quaternary Unconformity Gravel Pit Mwb 3 Henry Formation Km Qh(d) Dolton Member Mm Msb Mts QTm Unconformity Pleistocene Mh QTm 770 Mpo Mpo Mh QTm Qm Metropolis Formation 10 Mgd Mps Unconformity 15 Mh Mcy Qm 4 QTm Mounds Gravel Qc Mm Tertiary Pliocene Mpo Km Unconformity Msb 70 7 Upper 335 Mts Km McNairy Formation QTm Cretaceous Cretaceous Mm E N 70 Unconformity 180 O 128 Z Mm Qc Mg QTm T Msb L U A Mps Palestine Sandstone F Qc Mg E 7 Km IN Unconformity 104 M Mg QTm QTm N Mm Menard Limestone 207 O T 9 61 P M Qc O C Mwv Waltersburg Formation Mcy and Vienna Limestone Mwv Km Qc 78 Km AЈ Mts Tar Springs Sandstone Km 240 36 Km QTm 397 Mgd Glen Dean Limestone Km MALLARDMALLARD CREEKCREEK Gravel Pit FAULTFAULT AREAAREA Mcy Qm (fig.(fig.
  • GEOLOGY of OLMSTED QUADRANGLE Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William W

    GEOLOGY of OLMSTED QUADRANGLE Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William W

    GEOLOGY OF OLMSTED QUADRANGLE Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William W. Shilts, Executive Director PULASKI COUNTY, ILLINOIS Illinois Geologic Quadrangle Map ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY IGQ Olmsted-G E. Donald McKay III, Interim Director W. John Nelson, F. Brett Denny, John H. McBride, and Laura Williams 2009 CYPRESS 8 MI. R. 1 E. R. 2 E. 2.6 MI. TO ILL. 169 S J 140 N K 250 " 350 k 350 N Kom e" Kom J 37 br T QTm Kom 350 400 T. 15 S. 400 350 Qe 360 Qe J N Qe 33 QTm 32 QTm N J 31 400 32 33 34 Kom 400 35 400 400 400 J N 36 48 T k" N J 400 C 24 Kom Kom 0 k" 210 40 66 350 e" "k Kom br T. 14 S. N J Kom 38 Kom QTm K 0 T. 15 S. 350 T N J N J 380 T. 15 S. Price C 56 N " J R k A o 350 400 a Kom N J d Kom Kom C 60 350 QTm 400 k" C 66 400 N J T Tw k" N J Kom 5 S N J K 400 185 J Kom N 430 e" N 450 J br 350 4 6 350 N 400 J N J 400 N J 350 4 360 5 N J 3 C 24 " 400 J k C 54 2 N Kom N J k" Kom T 1 350 N J 85 N J k" 400 Kom QTm N J 450 T 450 Qe 450 N J 380 C 72 J 400 N k" N J QTm QTm K N 400 J N J 280 Qm k" S N J br 400 k" 81 66 N J k" QTm GEOLOGIC UNITS 400 Kom Qe K 350 J 350 N N Qe J 400 N J 450 380 N J 9 N J N J T 300 sm Bethlehem Road 8 Surface mine (clay) K J N N 450 J k"79 N J K T N Kom J 450 260 N J 450 N k" J 350 Holocene 450 br Qc N J Kom 400 350 450 J N N N J J 310 C Qc Cahokia Formation k" 205 400 k" 310 T k" N Kom J 65 Kom N J 400 N J Tpc br 285 C 40 Tpc k" QTm k" 470 Kom e" br 8 N 150 J 150 K 9 Tpc e" K Ck" 60 Kom Tpc N J Quaternary N J Tpc 10 250 J N Qm 11k"Kpc Clark Road Wisconsinan N J 250 N N J " J e Qe QTm 12 br Equality Formation N 52 7 J k" T N 450 450 J 400 Kom Unconformity J 350 N Tpc 370 J K QTm N N J 450 450 N J N 37 J Illinoian 450 Metropolis Formation 450 Qm 3885 C 84 T and older J N N 47 J 450 k" N J 440 ª k" QTm St.
  • Bedrock Geology of the Thebes Quadrangle Alexander County, Illinois, and Cape Girardeau and Scott Counties, Missouri

    Bedrock Geology of the Thebes Quadrangle Alexander County, Illinois, and Cape Girardeau and Scott Counties, Missouri

    STATEMAP Thebes-BG Bedrock Geology of the Thebes Quadrangle Alexander County, Illinois, and Cape Girardeau and Scott Counties, Missouri Joseph A. Devera, Jeremy R. Breeden, and Franck Delpomdor 2017 Prairie Research Institute ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 615 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820-6918 (217) 244-2414 http://www.isgs.illinois.edu © 2017 University of Illinois Board of Trustees. All rights reserved. For permission information, contact the Illinois State Geological Survey. Introduction Mesozoic Era sediments. The Mississippi River changed its course from flowing west at Grays Point to the south by The Thebes Quadrangle is located in extreme southwestern cutting through indurated Paleozoic bedrock at Thebes Gap Illinois and southeastern Missouri. This report covers only during the Late Pleistocene 10,000 yrs. BP (Blum et al., the Illinois portion of the Thebes Quadrangle. The Thebes 2000). The Gulf Coastal Plain sediments also blanket the Quadrangle contains rocks and sediments that were depos- southern portion of the quadrangle from east to west. Paleo- ited during the Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic Eras. gene sediments are confined to structural grabens, whereas The oldest formation in the study area is the Kimmswick Neogene sediments cap the ridges, and terrace the valleys. Limestone (Ordovician) the youngest deposit is Holocene The bedrock hills are highly dissected, in some cases along alluvium. The Thebes Quadrangle occurs south of the Il- structurally or vertical joint controlled valleys. The bed- linoisan glacial boundary and most Quaternary deposits rock valleys are choked with Pleistocene to Holocene chert were not drawn on the map. The loess deposits that blanket gravels derived from the local thick, cherty limestones and the upland surfaces, were not depicted in order to better silicified beds of Bailey and Grassy Knob Chert.