Arctic Rabies – a Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Epidemiology of Rabies
How to cite: Putra, K. S. A. (2018). Epidemiology of rabies. International Journal of Chemical & Material Sciences, 1(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijcms.v1n1.4 Epidemiology of Rabies Ketut Santhia Adhy Putra Independent Research of Zoonotic Diseases Ex. coordinator of Virology Laboratory, BBVet Denpasar, Directorate General of Livestock and Animal Health, Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract The occurrence of an outbreak of rabies in Bali as a shock to the people and local governments are instantly becoming the world's attention because of Bali as a world tourism destination. Since the first outbreak in the southern peninsula of Bali in November 2008, rabies quickly spread across the districts/municipality, until July 2015 had spread across 54 subdistricts and 263 villages. The proportion of rabies cases in the subdistricts and villages the highest occurred in 2011 is shown 94.7% and 36.7%, respectively, but its spread dropped dramatically in 2013 only occurred in 23 subdistricts (40.4%) and 38 villages (4,2%), though rabies outbreak back by increasing the number and distribution of rabies cases significantly in 2014, spread over 94 villages even until July 2015 spread over 89 villages. Rabies attacks the various breeds of dogs with the proportion of rabies in the local dogs showed the highest (98.44%), as well as the male dog, is very significantly higher than female dogs. By age group, the proportion seen in the age group of 1 to 2 years showed the highest (39.9%). Other animals, such as cats, cows, goats, and pigs have also contracted the rabies infected dog bitesthe. -
Respiratory Turbinates of Canids and Felids: a Quantitative Comparison
J. Zool., Lond. (2004) 264, 281–293 C 2004 The Zoological Society of London Printed in the United Kingdom DOI:10.1017/S0952836904005771 Respiratory turbinates of canids and felids: a quantitative comparison Blaire Van Valkenburgh1*, Jessica Theodor 2, Anthony Friscia1, Ari Pollack1 and Timothy Rowe3 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, U.S.A. 2 Department of Geology, Illinois State Museum, 1011 East Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703, U.S.A. 3 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, U.S.A. (Accepted 31 March 2004) Abstract The respiratory turbinates of mammals are complex bony plates within the nasal chamber that are covered with moist epithelium and provide an extensive surface area for the exchange of heat and water. Given their functional importance, maxilloturbinate size and structure are expected to vary predictably among species adapted to different environments. Here the first quantitative analysis is provided of maxilloturbinate structure based on high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans of the skulls of eight canid and seven felid species. The key parameters examined were the density of the maxilloturbinate bones within the nasal chamber and how that density varied along the air pathway. In both canids and felids, total maxilloturbinate chamber volume and bone volume increased with body size, with canids having c. 1.5–2.0 times the volume of maxilloturbinate than felids of similar size. In all species, the volume of the maxilloturbinates varies from rostral to caudal, with the peak volume occurring approximately midway, close to where airway cross-sectional area is greatest. -
Trapping Regulations You May Trap Wildlife for Subsistence Uses Only Within the Seasons and Harvest Limits in These Unit Trapping Regulations
Trapping Regulations You may trap wildlife for subsistence uses only within the seasons and harvest limits in these unit trapping regulations. Trapping wildlife out of season or in excess of harvest limits for subsistence uses is illegal and prohibited. However, you may trap unclassified wildlife (such as all squirrel and marmot species) in all units, without harvest limits, from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2016. Subsistence Trapping Restrictions When taking wildlife for subsistence purposes, ● Take (or assist in the taking of) furbearers by firearm trappers may not: before 3:00 a.m. on the day following the day on which airborne travel occurred. This does not apply to a ● Disturb or destroy a den (except any muskrat pushup trapper using a firearm to dispatch furbearers caught in or feeding house that may be disturbed in the course of a trap or snare. trapping). ● Use a net or fish trap (except a blackfish or fyke trap). ● Disturb or destroy any beaver house. ● Use a firearm other than a shotgun, muzzle-loaded ● Take beaver by any means other than a steel trap or rifle, rifle or pistol using center-firing cartridges, for the snare, except certain times of the year when firearms taking of a wolf or wolverine, except that: may be used to take beaver in Units 9, 12, 17, 18, 20E, ■ You may use a firearm that shoots rimfire 21E, 22 and 23. See Unit-specific regulations. cartridges to take wolf and wolverine under a ● Under a trapping license, take a free-ranging furbearer trapping license. You may sell the raw fur or tanned with a firearm on NPS lands. -
Southern and Eastern African Rabies Group International Symposium
PROCEEDINGS OF, THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN AFRICAN RABIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM PIETERMARITZBURG, SOUTH AFRICA 29-30 APRIL 1993 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOUTHERN AND EASTERN AFRICAN RABIES GROUP INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM PIETERMARITZBURG, SOUTH AFRICA 29-30 APRIL 1993 PUBLISHED BY S.E.A.R.G. EDITED BY GEORGE C. BISHOP S.E.A.R.G. ALLERTON REGIONAL VETERINARY LABORATORY P/BAG X2 CASCADES SOUTH AFRICA 3202 - 3 - - 4 - CONTENTS FOREWORD.........................................................................................................................................6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..................................................................................................................7 PROGRAMME .....................................................................................................................................9 OPENING ADDRESS.........................................................................................................................11 RABIES : THE HUMAN PERSPECTIVE KEY NOTE ADDRESS..............................................14 RABIES : THE INTERNATIONAL SITUATION..........................................................................16 RABIES IN SOUTHERN AFRICA...................................................................................................20 CANINE RABIES ...............................................................................................................................21 A PAEDIATRICIAN'S PERSPECTIVE OF RABIES....................................................................25 -
Preparedness for an Emerging Infectious Disease
pathogens Review Rabies in Our Neighbourhood: Preparedness for an Emerging Infectious Disease Michael P. Ward 1,* and Victoria J. Brookes 2,3 1 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia 2 School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia; [email protected] 3 Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University), Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-293511607 Abstract: Emerging infectious disease (EID) events have the potential to cause devastating impacts on human, animal and environmental health. A range of tools exist which can be applied to address EID event detection, preparedness and response. Here we use a case study of rabies in Southeast Asia and Oceania to illustrate, via nearly a decade of research activities, how such tools can be systematically integrated into a framework for EID preparedness. During the past three decades, canine rabies has spread to previously free areas of Southeast Asia, threatening the rabies-free status of countries such as Timor Leste, Papua New Guinea and Australia. The program of research to address rabies preparedness in the Oceanic region has included scanning and surveillance to define the emerging nature of canine rabies within the Southeast Asia region; field studies to collect information on potential reservoir species, their distribution and behaviour; participatory and sociological studies to identify priorities for disease response; and targeted risk assessment and disease modelling studies. Lessons learnt include the need to develop methods to collect data in remote regions, and the need to Citation: Ward, M.P.; Brookes, V.J. -
WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies, First Report
WHO Technical Report Series 931 WHO EXPERT CONSULTATION ON RABIES First Report 1 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies (2004 : Geneva, Switzerland) WHO Expert Consultation on Rabies : first report. (WHO technical report series ; 931) 1.Rabies - prevention and control 2.Rabies vaccines 3.Rabies virus 4.Epidemiologic surveillance 5.Guidelines I.Title II.Series. ISBN 92 4 120931 3 (NLM classification: WC 550) ISSN 0512-3054 © World Health Organization 2005 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. -
Original Article RABIES in EUROPE in 2010-2019
Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2020 ONLINE FIRST ISSN 1311-1477; DOI: 10.15547/bjvm.2020-0077 Original article RABIES IN EUROPE IN 20102019 M. FLIS Department of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland Summary Flis, M., 2020. Rabies in Europe in 20102019. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. (online first). The paper presents the epizootic and epidemiological situation of rabies in European countries during the last decade. The presented results indicate that the oral immunisation of fox anti-rabies (ORV), used in many European countries, significantly reduced the number of rabies cases found in ground mammals, but did not eliminate the virus at all. Currently, the largest reservoir of the virus are Eastern European countries where there are no immunisation activities or their effectiveness is low. Due to the absence of geographical barriers, the virus reappears in countries that have been described as free from rabies. As a rule, it is dragged into these areas along with the movement of companion animals and by people travelling to countries where the prevalence of the virus is common. It should be emphasised that due to the significant elimination of the virus in wild and domestic animals, it found quite quickly found a new reservoir in a specific group of mammals, having the ability to fly, like bats. Currently there is no possibility of carrying out any preventive measures in bats, so all the virus strains found in this group of animals are dangerous to humans, raising possibilities of epidemiological threat. -
The Dog and Cat Meat Trade: a Global Health Risk
The Dog and Cat Meat Trade: A Global Health Risk February 2021 Indonesia (DMFI) © Dog Meat Free Photo: Cats next to chickens for sale at live animal market in Indonesia Executive summary © iStockphoto / Domepitipat © iStockphoto The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating toll stolen pets. These animals are often taken to markets globally; not only in terms of its impact on global health to be sold for slaughter alongside wildlife species. At but also economically with widespread job losses and the markets and generally, the trade operates in breach the livelihoods of millions threatened. As the world of existing laws and regulations pertaining to infectious struggles with the effects of the disease, it is important disease control, sanitation, cross border transportation, to consider and understand how it came about in the theft, and animal welfare. first place so that measures can be taken to reduce the chances of other pandemics happening in the future. The true scale of the risks the dog and cat meat trade © DMFI poses to both public and animal health is difficult to COVID-19 is believed to have originated in a live animal quantify given the nature of the operations of the trade, Customers at a dog and cat meat restaurant in Vietnam market in Wuhan, China, as the result of zoonotic its reliance on a supply of animals of unknown health transmission. It is widely accepted that the conditions in status and origins, as well as illegal operations. However, such live animal markets provide the perfect there is mounting evidence that the trade poses environment for the emergence of novel zoonotic significant risks to global health – on top of well-known pathogens, and many pathologists and virologists have zoonotic risks of the trade that have directly been seen, warned authorities of the public health dangers that such as rabies and anthrax. -
Why Is There Still Rabies in the World? - an Emerging Microbial and Global Health Threat
Global Veterinaria 4 (1): 34-50, 2010 ISSN 1992-6197 © IDOSI Publications, 2010 Why Is There Still Rabies in the World? - An Emerging Microbial and Global Health Threat 12I.O. Okonko, O.B. Adedeji, 3E.T. Babalola, 4E.A. Fajobi, 56A. Fowotade and O.G. Adewale 1Department of Virology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, University College Hospital (UCH) Ibadan, Nigeria 2Department of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria 3Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria 4Department of Basic Sciences, Federal College of Wildlife Management, New Bussa, Niger State, Nigeria 5Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria 6Department of Biochemistry, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria Abstract: This review reports on why is there still rabies in the world?-an emerging microbial and global health threat. Rabies remains an important public health issue in the world. While rabies has been controlled throughout most of the developed world, it remains a significant burden in developing countries, particularly in Africa and Asia. Although industrialized countries have been able to contain recent outbreaks, many resource-limited and transitioning countries have not been able to react adequately. Although, a vaccine- preventable disease, the annual number of human deaths caused by rabies is estimated to be 35,000 per year, mostly in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Though, dogs have been identified as being primarily responsible for the transmission of rabies in human and other domestic animals, known pathogenesis and available data suggest that all or nearly all cases of human rabies attributable to bats were transmitted by bat bites that were minimized or unrecognized by the patients. -
Comprehension-Polar-Creatures
Polar Creatures The North and South Poles are the coldest places on Earth. The Arctic is close to the North Pole while the Antarctic is near the South Pole. This is a polar This is a walrus. It eats fish and sea bear. It likes to creatures such as eat seals and clams. A walrus fish. It has a has two really thick furry long teeth called coat to keep tusks which are warm and big paws to help it used as hooks walk on the snow. to pull it out of the water. This is an arctic fox. Its This is a snowy owl. brown coat turns It has white white in the feathers so that it winter. Arctic cannot be seen. It foxes eat birds, swoops down to fish, small mammals grab hares, mice or and eggs. It has a thick lemmings in its claws fur coat to stay warm. for food. classroomsecrets.com © Classroom Secrets Limited 2015 Comprehension – Polar Creatures – 1a – Beginner Polar Creatures Complete this table with . (AF2) Name of Eats plants or Eats fish or sea Eats birds or Eats mammals creature fruit creatures eggs polar bear walrus snowy owl arctic fox Why has the writer put the information in boxes? (AF4) What does the walrus use to help it get out of the water? (AF2) Why do you think that the arctic fox turns white in the winter? (AF3) classroomsecrets.com © Classroom Secrets Limited 2015 Comprehension – Polar Creatures – 1a – Beginner Polar Creatures Complete this table with . (AF2) Name of Eats plants or Eats fish or sea Eats birds or Eats mammals creature fruit creatures eggs polar bear walrus snowy owl arctic fox Why has the writer put the information in boxes? (AF4) To make it easier to read. -
Raccoon Dog Misrepresentation Continues Investigation Results: Fall/Winter 2007
Raccoon Dog Misrepresentation Continues Investigation Results: Fall/Winter 2007 Published March 18, 2008 Summary In the fall and winter of 2007, investigators from The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) purchased and tested fur-trimmed jackets from some of the largest names in fashion. Seven jackets were found to contain real fur despite being advertised or labeled as faux fur, and these results were publicized on December 20, 2007. An additional six jackets— detailed in the chart below—were found to be falsely advertised or mislabeled as the wrong species—or simply as “fur.” Retailers and brand names associated with these jackets include Sears, Bluefly, Dillard’s, Eluxury.com, Caché, Dr. Jay’s, and Juicy Couture. Four of the jackets contain raccoon dog fur. Background December 2007: The HSUS publicizes findings that seven fur-trimmed garments purchased from major retailers, and advertised or labeled as faux fur, in fact contain real fur from raccoon dogs, raccoons, or rabbits. Retailers and brand names associated with these jackets include Saks Fifth Avenue, Dillard’s, Andrew Marc, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus and Burberry. March 2007: Andrew Marc, Dillard’s, Lord & Taylor, Neiman Marcus, Macy’s, and seven other major retailers and designers were named by The HSUS in a petition filed before the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) seeking enforcement actions for violations of the Fur Products Labeling Act. The petition remains pending before the FTC. February 2007: The Dog and Cat Fur Prohibition Enforcement Act—H.R. 891—is introduced by Reps. Jim Moran (D- Va.) and Michael Ferguson (R-N.J.). -
Rabies in Zimbabwe: Reservoir Dogs and the Implications for Disease Control
Rabies in Zimbabwe: reservoir dogs and the implications for disease control C. J. Rhodes1*, R. P. D. Atkinson2, R. M. Anderson1 and D. W. Macdonald2 1WellcomeTrust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, and 2Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK Using detailed ¢eld study observations of the side-striped jackal (Canis adustus) and a simple stochastic model of the transmission dynamics of the virus and host demography, we discuss the epidemiology of rabies virus infection in the jackal population of Zimbabwe. Of the two jackal species in Zimbabwe, the other being the black-backed jackal (Canis mesomelas), the bulk of noti¢ed rabies cases are in side-striped jackals. Speci¢cally, we show that the side-striped jackal population itself does not seem able to support rabies infection endemically, i.e. without frequent reintroduction from outside sources of infection. We argue that this is probably because the overall average jackal population density is too low to maintain the chain of infection. This study suggests that the disease is regularly introduced to jackals by rabid dogs from populations associated with human settlements. Given the rapidly rising dog population in Zimbabwe, estimates are derived of the future incidence of jackal rabies based on di¡erent dog-vaccination scenarios. Keywords: rabies; jackals; mathematical model transmission of rabies in this context (Gascoyne et al. 1. INTRODUCTION 1993b; Macdonald 1993). Furthermore, a greater preva- Rabies is a communicable disease capable of infecting all lence of rabies infection would have an impact on the mammals.