DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment of Statoilhydro Canada Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment of Statoilhydro Canada Ltd Environmental Assessment of StatoilHydro Canada Ltd. Exploration and Appraisal/Delineation Drilling Program for Offshore Newfoundland, 2008-2016 Prepared by for March 2008 Project No. SA947b Environmental Assessment of StatoilHydro Canada Ltd. Exploration and Appraisal/Delineation Drilling Program for Offshore Newfoundland, 2008-2016 Prepared by LGL Limited environmental research associates 388 Kenmount Road, Box 13248, Stn. A., St. John’s, NL A1B 4A5 Tel: 709-754-1992 [email protected] www.lgl.com In Association With Canning & Pitt Associates, Inc. Box 21461, St. John's, NL A1A 5G2 Tel: 709-738-0133 www.canpitt.ca and Oceans Limited 65A LeMarchant Road St. John’s, NL A1C 2G9 Tel: 709-753-5788 Prepared for StatoilHydro Canada Ltd. Suite 600, Scotia Centre 235 Water Street St. John’s, NL A1C 1B6 March 2008 Project No. SA947b Suggested format for citation: LGL Limited. 2008. Environmental Assessment of StatoilHydro Canada Ltd. Exploration and Appraisal/Delineation Drilling Program for Offshore Newfoundland, 2008-2016. LGL Rep. SA947b. Rep. by LGL Limited, Canning & Pitt Associates Inc., and Oceans Ltd., St. John’s, NL, for StatoilHydro Canada Ltd., St. John’s, NL. 292 p. + appendices. Table of Contents Page List of Figures............................................................................................................................................ vi List of Tables ...............................................................................................................................................x 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 2.0 The Operator....................................................................................................................................5 2.1. Operator’s Objectives........................................................................................................5 2.2. Social Responsibility and Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Benefits.........................6 2.3. Operator Contacts..............................................................................................................6 3.0 Project Overview.............................................................................................................................7 3.1. Personnel...........................................................................................................................7 3.2. Name and Location of Proposed Project............................................................................7 3.3. Alternatives to Project/Alternative Means within Project................................................11 3.4. Mobile Offshore Drilling Units .......................................................................................11 3.5. Logistic Support ..............................................................................................................12 3.5.1. Marine Support Vessels ........................................................................................ 12 3.5.2. Helicopter Support................................................................................................ 13 3.5.3. Shorebase Facilities .............................................................................................. 13 3.5.4. Ice Management.................................................................................................... 13 3.6. Project Components/Structures/Activities .......................................................................13 3.6.1. General.................................................................................................................. 13 3.6.2. Project Phases....................................................................................................... 14 3.6.3. Project Scheduling................................................................................................ 14 3.6.4. Description of Waste Discharges, Air Emissions and Treatment......................... 15 3.6.5. Geohazard and VSP Surveys ................................................................................ 20 3.6.6. Geotechnical Testing............................................................................................ 20 3.6.7. Onsite Environmental/Ice Observers .................................................................... 20 3.6.8. Project Site Information........................................................................................ 21 3.6.9. Effects of the Environment on the Project............................................................ 23 3.7. Consultations...................................................................................................................23 4.0 Physical Environment ....................................................................................................................24 4.1. Geochemical....................................................................................................................24 4.1.1. Geology................................................................................................................. 24 4.1.2. Chemical Environment ......................................................................................... 24 4.2. Climatology.....................................................................................................................26 4.2.1. Data Sources......................................................................................................... 30 4.2.3. Waves.................................................................................................................... 37 4.2.4. Air and Sea Temperature ...................................................................................... 49 4.2.5. Precipitation ....................................................................................................................52 4.2.6. Visibility..........................................................................................................................54 StatoilHydro’s Drilling Program LGL Limited Environmental Assessment Page ii 4.2.7. Tropical Storms ...............................................................................................................57 4.3. Physical Oceanography ...................................................................................................66 4.3.1. General Description of the Major Currents .......................................................... 66 4.3.2. Currents in the Project Area.................................................................................. 69 4.3.3. Water Mass Structure............................................................................................ 72 4.3.4. Water Properties in the Project Area .................................................................... 73 4.4. Ice and Icebergs...............................................................................................................81 4.4.1. Sea Ice................................................................................................................... 81 4.4.2. Icebergs................................................................................................................. 83 5.0 Biological Environment.................................................................................................................87 5.1. Ecosystem .......................................................................................................................87 5.2. Invertebrates and Fish .....................................................................................................87 5.2.1. Marine Habitats..................................................................................................... 87 5.2.2. Profiles of Commercially-Important Species........................................................ 90 5.2.3. Invertebrate and Fish Spawning............................................................................ 93 5.2.4. DFO Research Survey Data, 2005-2006............................................................... 93 5.3. Commercial Fisheries....................................................................................................103 5.3.1. Data..................................................................................................................... 103 5.3.2. Consultations....................................................................................................... 104 5.3.3. Historical Overview of Area Fisheries ............................................................... 104 5.3.4. Current Domestic Harvests................................................................................. 107 5.3.5. Fisheries Research.............................................................................................. 130 5.4. Seabirds.........................................................................................................................130 5.4.1. Seasonal Abundance of Seabirds in the Study Area........................................... 130 5.4.2. Prey and Foraging Habits.................................................................................... 136 5.5. Marine Mammals ..........................................................................................................138 5.5.1. DFO Cetacean Sighting Database....................................................................... 142 5.5.2. Species Profiles..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • And Bridge Overloads
    FINAL REPORT Development of Risk Models for Florida's Bridge Management System (Reuters) Contract No. BDK83 977-11 John O. Sobanjo Florida State University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 2525 Pottsdamer St. Tallahassee, FL 32310 Paul D. Thompson Consultant 17035 NE 28th Place Bellevue, WA 98008 Prepared for: State Maintenance Office Florida Department of Transportation Tallahassee, FL 32309 June 2013 Final Report ii Disclaimer The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), or Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Final Report iii SI* (MODERN METRIC) CONVERSION FACTORS APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in Inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft Feet 0.305 meters m yd Yards 0.914 meters m mi Miles 1.61 kilometers km SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL AREA in2 Square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 Square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms
    FLORIDA HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 1871-1995: An Historical Survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams '+wcCopy~~ I~BN 0-912747-08-0 Florida SeaGrant College is supported by award of the Office of Sea Grant, NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,grant number NA 36RG-0070, under provisions of the NationalSea Grant College and Programs Act of 1966. This information is published by the Sea Grant Extension Program which functionsas a coinponentof the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Extensionwork in Agriculture, Home Economics, and Marine Sciences,State of Florida, U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, U.S. Departmentof Commerce, and Boards of County Commissioners, cooperating.Printed and distributed in furtherance af the Actsof Congressof May 8 andJune 14, 1914.The Florida Sea Grant Collegeis an Equal Opportunity-AffirmativeAction employer authorizedto provide research, educational information and other servicesonly to individuals and institutions that function without regardto race,color, sex, age,handicap or nationalorigin. Coverphoto: Hank Brandli & Rob Downey LOANCOPY ONLY Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 1871-1995: An Historical survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams Division of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 32901 Technical Paper - 71 June 1994 $5.00 Copies may be obtained from: Florida Sea Grant College Program University of Florida Building 803 P.O. Box 110409 Gainesville, FL 32611-0409 904-392-2801 II Our friend andcolleague, Fred Doehringpictured below, died on January 5, 1993, before this manuscript was completed. Until his death, Fred had spent the last 18 months painstakingly researchingdata for this book.
    [Show full text]
  • FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER by DAY (To 1994) OCTOBER 1 1969
    FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER BY DAY (to 1994) OCTOBER 1 1969 - 1730 - Clay Co., Orange Park - Lightning killed a construction worker who was working on a bridge. A subtropical storm spawned one weak tornado and several waterspouts in Franklin Co. in the morning. 2 195l - south Florida - The center of a Tropical Storm crossed Florida from near Fort Myers to Vero Beach. Rainfall totals ranged from eight to 13 inches along the track, but no strong winds occurred near the center. The strong winds of 50 to 60 mph were all in squalls along the lower east coast and Keys, causing minor property damage. Greatest damage was from rains that flooded farms and pasture lands over a broad belt extending from Naples, Fort Myers, and Punta Gorda on the west coast to Stuart, Fort Pierce, and Vero Beach on the east. Early fall crops flooded out in rich Okeechobee farming area. Many cattle had to be moved out of flooded area, and quite a few were lost by drowning or starvation. Roadways damaged and several bridges washed out. 2-4 1994 - northwest Florida - Flood/Coastal Flood - The remnants of Tropical Depression 10 moved from the northeast Gulf of Mexico, across the Florida Panhandle, and into Georgia on the 2nd. High winds produced rough seas along west central and northwest Florida coasts causing minor tidal flooding and beach erosion. Eighteen people had to be rescued from sinking boats in the northeast Gulf of Mexico. Heavy rains in the Florida Big Bend and Panhandle accompanied the system causing extensive flooding to roadways, creeks and low lying areas and minor flooding of rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Effect of Visualization Tool Exposure on Local-Level Stakeholder Perceptions on Climate Change Adaptation
    Examining the Effect of Visualization Tool Exposure on Local-level Stakeholder Perceptions on Climate Change Adaptation by Maliha Majeed A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Geography Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Maliha Majeed 2015 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii ABSTRACT Vulnerabilities of human communities, driven by environmental, social, economic, and political dynamics, vary across geographical and social regions. Coastal communities are considered to be among those greatest at risk from climate impacts. To cope with these impacts, communities must assess existing vulnerabilities and adaptive capacities, and begin to adapt. Currently, community-based research often focuses on identifying vulnerabilities and possible adaptations, but rarely examines how local-level stakeholders perceive adaptation-based needs and potential action. This research study focuses on Lennox Island, in Prince Edward Island and the Town of Lockeport, in Nova Scotia to examine how two innovative visualization tools, CLIVE and AdaptNS, influence stakeholder perceptions on climate change adaptation. This study explores whether tool exposure changes perceptions of awareness and priorities for potential action among local-level decision-makers and stakeholders. It further explores which aspects of the visualization tools resonate among local-level decision-makers. This research builds on existing vulnerability assessment information established through the Partnership for Canada-Caribbean Community Climate Change Adaptation (ParCA) research project and uses a methodological approach involving semi-structured interviews and community-based workshops with local-level decision-makers and community stakeholders, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Superstorm Sandy 2012 in a Multi-Disciplinary Approach
    EGU Journal Logos (RGB) Open Access Open Access Open Access Advances in Annales Nonlinear Processes Geosciences Geophysicae in Geophysics Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Open Access Open Access Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,Natural 1, 625–679, Hazards 2013 Natural Hazards www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/1/625/2013/ and Earth System doi:10.5194/nhessd-1-625-2013and Earth System © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License.Sciences Sciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Natural Hazards and Earth Chemistry Chemistry System Sciences (NHESS). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in NHESS if available. and Physics and Physics Discussions Open Access Open Access Investigation ofAtmospheric superstorm SandyAtmospheric 2012 in Measurement Measurement a multi-disciplinaryTechniques approach Techniques Discussions Open Access Open Access M. Kunz1,2, B. Muhr¨ 1,2, T. Kunz-Plapp1,3, J.E. Daniell1,3, B. Khazai1,3, F. Wenzel1,3, 1,4Biogeosciences1,4 1,5 Biogeosciences1,6 1,7 M. Vannieuwenhuyse , T. Comes , F. Elmer , K. Schroter¨ , J.Discussions Fohringer , T. Munzberg¨ 1,8, C. Lucas1,9, and J. Zschau1,10 Open Access 1 Open Access Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (CEDIM),Climate Potsdam and Karlsruhe, Germany Climate 2 of the Past of the Past Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-TRO), Karlsruhe InstituteDiscussions of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe,
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms, 1871-1993: an Historical Survey, the Only Books Or Reports Exclu- Sively on Florida Hurricanes Were R.W
    3. 2b -.I 3 Contents List of Tables, Figures, and Plates, ix Foreword, xi Preface, xiii Chapter 1. Introduction, 1 Chapter 2. Historical Discussion of Florida Hurricanes, 5 1871-1900, 6 1901-1930, 9 1931-1960, 16 1961-1990, 24 Chapter 3. Four Years and Billions of Dollars Later, 36 1991, 36 1992, 37 1993, 42 1994, 43 Chapter 4. Allison to Roxanne, 47 1995, 47 Chapter 5. Hurricane Season of 1996, 54 Appendix 1. Hurricane Preparedness, 56 Appendix 2. Glossary, 61 References, 63 Tables and Figures, 67 Plates, 129 Index of Named Hurricanes, 143 Subject Index, 144 About the Authors, 147 Tables, Figures, and Plates Tables, 67 1. Saffir/Simpson Scale, 67 2. Hurricane Classification Prior to 1972, 68 3. Number of Hurricanes, Tropical Storms, and Combined Total Storms by 10-Year Increments, 69 4. Florida Hurricanes, 1871-1996, 70 Figures, 84 l A-I. Great Miami Hurricane 2A-B. Great Lake Okeechobee Hurricane 3A-C.Great Labor Day Hurricane 4A-C. Hurricane Donna 5. Hurricane Cleo 6A-B. Hurricane Betsy 7A-C. Hurricane David 8. Hurricane Elena 9A-C. Hurricane Juan IOA-B. Hurricane Kate 1 l A-J. Hurricane Andrew 12A-C. Hurricane Albert0 13. Hurricane Beryl 14A-D. Hurricane Gordon 15A-C. Hurricane Allison 16A-F. Hurricane Erin 17A-B. Hurricane Jerry 18A-G. Hurricane Opal I9A. 1995 Hurricane Season 19B. Five 1995 Storms 20. Hurricane Josephine , Plates, X29 1. 1871-1880 2. 1881-1890 Foreword 3. 1891-1900 4. 1901-1910 5. 1911-1920 6. 1921-1930 7. 1931-1940 These days, nothing can escape the watchful, high-tech eyes of the National 8.
    [Show full text]
  • WJXT Weather Guide, 1822-1972 : a Weather Handbook George Winterling
    University of North Florida UNF Digital Commons Jacksonville and Duval Co. Miscellaneous Community and Government Publications 1972 WJXT Weather Guide, 1822-1972 : a Weather Handbook George Winterling Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/jaxdoc Part of the Atmospheric Sciences Commons, Climate Commons, Meteorology Commons, and the Television Commons Recommended Citation WJXT Weather Guide, 1822-1972 : a Weather Handbook. 1972. Community and Government Publications Collections. University of North Florida, Thomas G. Carpenter Library Special Collections and Archives. UNF Digital Commons, https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/jaxdoc/3/ This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Community and Government Publications at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Jacksonville and Duval Co. Miscellaneous by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 1972 All Rights Reserved A day in the life of a T.V. weatherman ... As the first rays of daylighttbreak through the trees, George hears the call to hot chocolate and toast for his two teenagers, Frank and Steve. Peering out the window, he notes the movement of the fragmented cumulus clouds, checking for any changes that may have developed from yesterday's pattern. A half hour later, nine-year-old Wendy Gale joins him and his wife, Virginia, for breakfast. Steve is checking the sports page for the Atlanta Braves' score while Frank finishes combing his hair. Shortly, Wendy and the boys have left for school, Virginia relates her rounds for the day, and George picks up some packets of weather maps for the fifth-grade classes he will address this morning.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Tornadoes Associated with Land-Falling Gulf
    CHARACTERISTICS OF TORNADOES ASSOCIATED WITH LAND-FALLING GULF COAST TROPICAL CYCLONES by CORY L. RHODES DR. JASON SENKBEIL, COMMITTEE CHAIR DR. DAVID BROMMER DR. P. GRADY DIXON A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Geography in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2012 Copyright Cory L. Rhodes 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Tropical cyclone tornadoes are brief and often unpredictable events that can produce fatalities and create considerable economic loss. Given these uncertainties, it is important to understand the characteristics and factors that contribute to tornado formation within tropical cyclones. This thesis analyzes this hazardous phenomenon, examining the relationships among tropical cyclone intensity, size, and tornado output. Furthermore, the influences of synoptic and dynamic parameters on tornado output near the time of tornado formation were assessed among two phases of a tropical cyclone’s life cycle; those among hurricanes and tropical storms, termed tropical cyclone tornadoes (TCT), and those among tropical depressions and remnant lows, termed tropical low tornadoes (TLT). Results show that tornado output is affected by tropical cyclone intensity, and to a lesser extent size, with those classified as large in size and ‘major’ in intensity producing a greater amount of tornadoes. Increased values of storm relative helicity are dominant for the TCT environment while CAPE remains the driving force for TLT storms. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor and committee chair, Dr. Jason Senkbeil, and fellow committee members Dr. David Brommer and Dr. P. Grady Dixon for their encouragement, guidance and tremendous support throughout the entire thesis process.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hazardous Weather Day-By-Day
    FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER DAY-BY-DAY Bartlett C. Hagemeyer JoAnn S. Carney National Weather Service Office Melbourne. Florida November 1995 National Weather Service Southern Region Headquarters Fort Worth, Texas FLORIDA HAZARDOUS WEATHER BY DAY (to 1994) Bartlett C. Hagemeyer JoAnn S. Carney National Weather Service Office Melbourne, Florida 32935 1. Introduction An extensive search of weather records and publications was undertaken to document the occurrence of hazardous weather elements in Florida. The hazardous weather events were then organized with the goal of having at least one event for every day of the year - in other words - a Florida hazardous weather calendar. The authors felt this was a method for a variety of users to better understand, and put into perspective, all the hazardous weather elements Florida is subject to. Initially, brief descriptions of every event that caused a weather-related fatality were included, and any other hazardous weather events that caused significant injuries or property damage, or that was of an unusual nature. Most days of the year were covered in this fashion. To have an event for each day, events that did not cause injury or serious property damage were included on some days. Many days had several major events and several days had only one minor event. In the interest of brevity not all non-fatal events could be included on days with multiple occurrences. There are literally hundreds of minor events that are not included in this document. The authors attempted to include the most significant events. This document concerns short-term hazardous weather events ranging in time from several minutes to several days.
    [Show full text]
  • 1973 Variations of Hurricane Heat Potential in the Philippine Sea and the Gulf of Mexico
    1973 VARIATIONS OF HURRICANE HEAT POTENTIAL IN THE PHILIPPINE SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO Paul Dennis Shuman NPS-58LR74031 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS 1973 VARIATIONS OF HURRICANE HEAT POTENTIAL IN THE PHILIPPINE SEA AND THE GULP 1 OF MEXICO by Paul Dennis Shuman March 1974 Thesis Advisor: D. F. LeiDDer Prepared for: Office of Naval Research NASA-Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Code 400P and Code 481 Zack H. Byrns, Code TF6 Arlington, VA 22217 Houston, TX 77058 AppAovzd fan. public neJLiLCUbz.; dUtAAJbution wnLbnittd. T160853 DUDLEY KiMUX LIBRARY NAVAL l-OSTGRADUATE SCHOOL iviONTEREY. CALIFORNIA 93940 1973 Variations of Hurricane Heat Potential in the Philippine Sea and the Gulf of Mexico by Paul Dennis Shuman Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy B.S., United States Naval Academy, 1965 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN OCEANOGRAPHY from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL March 197^ 7%esis a. i DUDLEY KNOX LIBRARY NAVAL POSTGRADUATE Si MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California Rear Admiral Mason Freeman Jack R. Borsting Superintendent Provost This thesis is prepared in conjunction with research supported in part by Office of Naval Research under Project Order No. PO-0121 and NASA-Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center under Project Order No. T-4650B. Reproduction of all or part of this report is authorized. Released as a Technical Report by: ABSTRACT The 1973 summer growth of hurricane heat potential (HHP) and its relation to tropical cyclones was studied in the Philippine Sea and the Gulf of Mexico on a monthly basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's History, but It Fell Into the Category of Only Being Slightly Feet
    22 wasreported in Homesteadon the21st of September.Lowest baro- metricpressure was 28,44 inches, and top winds were 122 miles per hour. Thehurricane killed 3 peopleand caused 105 million dollars damage. The second1948 storm ran from the 3rd to the 15thof October and startedjust off the Nicaraguan/Hondurascoast in the northwest CaribbeanSea. Thishurricane also moved across western Cuba into theFlorida Straits and even crossed the September hurricane's path nearthe coordinates 24.0N and 82.0W. This storm passed through theKeys and extreme south Florida into Grand Bahama Island. At about31N latitude it dida giganticloop in themiddle of the Atlantic andfinally became a non-tropical cyclone. A tornadowas reported in FortLauderdale onthe 5th of October.Lowest barometric pres- surewas 28.92 inches, and top winds were around 90 miles per hour. In August1949, another major hurricane, taking a coursesimilar to theGreat Hurricane of September1928 entered the coast near PalmBeach. It wasthe worst hurricane felt in the LakeOkeechobee areasince 1928. Hurricane force winds were reported atSt. Augus- tine,Cape Canaveral, andMelbourne, and winds of 120miles per houror greater were felt from Stuart to Pompano. The highest re- cordedwind speed gust, 153 miles per hour, was at Jupiter, only 2 milesper hour less than the wind speed record set on September 27, 1947.The amount of damagein dollars, 45 million equivalent to $270million in 1990!,was almost twice that of the1928 hurricane. Thestorm was not classified asbeing among the Great Hurricanes in Florida'shistory, but it fellinto the category ofonly being slightly belowthem U.S. Weather Bureau, August 1949!. Tides were 24 feetand 23 feet at Belle Glade and Okeechobee, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Superstorm Sandy 2012 in a Multi-Disciplinary Approach
    Open Access Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2579–2598, 2013 Natural Hazards www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/13/2579/2013/ doi:10.5194/nhess-13-2579-2013 and Earth System © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Sciences Investigation of superstorm Sandy 2012 in a multi-disciplinary approach M. Kunz1,2, B. Mühr1,2, T. Kunz-Plapp1,3, J. E. Daniell1,3, B. Khazai1,3, F. Wenzel1,3, M. Vannieuwenhuyse1,4, T. Comes1,4, F. Elmer1,5, K. Schröter1,6, J. Fohringer1,7, T. Münzberg1,8, C. Lucas1,9, and J. Zschau1,10 1Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology (CEDIM), Potsdam and Karlsruhe, Germany 2Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-TRO), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany 3Geophysical Institute (GPI), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany 4Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany 5Scientific Infrastructure and Platforms, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany 6Section Hydrology, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany 7Section Geoinformatics, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany 8Institute for Nuclear and Energy Technologies (IKET), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany 9Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (IPF), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany 10Section Earthquake Risk and Early Warning, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany Correspondence to: M. Kunz ([email protected]) Received: 8 January 2013 – Published in Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.: 25 March 2013 Revised: 3 July 2013 – Accepted: 6 September 2013 – Published: 18 October 2013 Abstract. At the end of October 2012, Hurricane Sandy Thus, seven years after the record impact of Hurricane Kat- moved from the Caribbean Sea into the Atlantic Ocean and rina in 2005, Hurricane Sandy is the second costliest hurri- entered the United States not far from New York.
    [Show full text]