<<

Social Monitoring Report

Bi-Annual Social Monitoring Report on Involuntary Resettlement (December 2019)

PAK: Provincial Road Improvement Project

Prepared by Works & Services Department Government of Sindh for the Asian Development Bank.

NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Islamic Republic of and its agencies ends on 30 June.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

This Social Monitoring Report on Involuntary Resettlement is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Social Monitoring Report

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report on Involuntary Resettlement (December 2019)

PAK: Sindh Provincial Road Improvement Project

Prepared by Works & Services Department Government of Sindh for the Asian Development Bank.

NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and its agencies ends on 30 June.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

This Bi-Annual Monitoring Report on Involuntary Resettlement is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Clients: Asian Works & Services Development Bank Department Government of Sindh

Project Management Consultants Bi-Annual Monitoring Report on Involuntary Resettlement (July-December 2019)

SINDH PROVINCIALROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (SPRIP) Loan No. 3305 – PAK/Contract No. SPRIP – CS1

JANUARY-2020

This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the view of ADB or the Government concerned and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents.

Prepared by Project Management Consultants Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE S/NO DESCRIPTION NO. 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 STATUSOF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT THE TIME OF FIELD VISIT 4 3 IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTION ADJUSTMENTS TO AVOID IR IMPACTS 4 4 INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON ADDITIONALSUB-PROJECTS 5 TABLE1: FINDINGS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES TO AVOID 6 POTENTIAL LAR IMPACTS FIGURE 1: NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO HOUSE LOCATED AT CHAINAGE 09+700 8 LOT-1 TANDO ALLAYAR TO CHAMBER FIGURE 2: NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO MOSQUE LOCATED AT CHAINAGE 09+10+500 8 LOT-1 TANDO ALLAYAR TO CHAMBER FIGURE 3: CONSTRUCTION WORK IS IN PROGRESS AND NO DAMAGES WAS DONE TO THE 9 HOUSES LOCATED AT CHAINGE at 04+200 LOT-2 SEHWAN-DADU ROAD FIGURE 4: CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO MOSQUE & 9 GRAVEMEN AT CHAINAGE 10+360 LOT-2 SEHWAN-DADU ROAD FIGURE 5: CONSTRUCTION WORK IS IN PROGRESS & NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO SHOPS 10 AT CH: 00+000 LOT-3 JEHAN KHAN TO CHAK SECTION SUB-PROJECT FIGURE-6: CONSTRUCTION WORK IS IN PROGRESS & NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO SHOPS LOCATED AT EDGE OF THE ROAD AT CH: 00+000 AT LOT-3 CHAK TO FAIZU LARO ROAD 10 SECTION FIGURE-7: NO LAND ACQUISITION IS REQUIRED AT LOT-3 CHAK TO FAIZU LARO ROAD 11 SECTION 5 CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION OF BRIDGES 11 TABLE-2: PROGRESS REGARDING CONSTRUCTION/REHABILITAION OF BRIDGES 11 6 MEASURES TO ADDRESS POTENTIAL OF ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE 12 TABLE-3: FINDINGS ON MEASURES TO AVOID ACCIDENTAL DAMAGES 12 FIGURE-8: Warning signs Placed at LOT-o1 to avoid traffic accidents 13 FIGURE-9: Warning signs Placed at LOT-02 to avoid traffic accidents 13 FIGURE-10: Warning signs placed at LOT-03 to avoid traffic accidents 13 7 OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: IMPAIRED OR RESTRICTED ASSESS 14 8 CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION 14 9 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 14 9.1 FUNCTIONING OF GRM 16 9.2 OBSERVATION / FINDING 16 10 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 17 11 MONITORING PLAN 17 11.1 OBJECTIVES OF MONITORING PLAN 18 TABLE MONITORING PLAN 19 ANNEXURE A Consultations with Local People & Notables 21 Table-1 A: Consultations with Local People &Notables of (ICB-07, LOT-01) Tando 22 Allahyar To Chamber Sub-Section Table-2A: Consultations with Local People & Notables of (ICB-07, LOT-02) Dadu Sehwan 22 Table 3A: Consultations with Local People & Notables (ICB-07, LOT-03) Jehan Khan to 23 Chak via Rustam ANNEXURE-B PICTORIAL PRESENTATION 24 CONSULTATION SESSION LOT-01 TANDO ALLAHYAR TO CHAMBER 25 CONSULTATION SESSION TO LOT-2 SEHWAN RAILWAY CROSSING (N-55) TO DADU VIA 26 TALTI UPTO DADU - MORO ROAD CONSULTATION SESSION TO LOT-3 JEHAN KHAN TO FAIZU LARO VIA CHAK RUSTAM 27 ROAD SECTION (29.1 KM) ANNEXURE-C, Letters for ROW 28 ANNEXURE-D, Minutes Of Meeting Grievance Redress Committee 32

2

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

LIST OF ABBREVIATION

ADB Asian Development Bank SPRIP Sindh Provincial Road Improvement Project PMU Project Management Unit PMC Project Management Consultants FGD Focus Group Discussions WSD Works and Services Department GOS Government of Sindh IR Involuntary Resettlement IP Indigenous People MPR Monthly Progress Report GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism GRC Grievance Redress Committee LGRC Local Grievance Redress Committee PIU Project Implementation Unit ROW Right of Way RD Reduced Distance SPS Safeguard Policy Statement RP Resettlement Plan SC Supervision Consultants

3

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

1. INTRODUCTION

1. This is the Bi-annual monitoring report on involuntary Resettlement for (July- December 2019) covering works needed to be monitored identified IR issues in DDR August 2017 for 6 subprojects and DDR July 2018 for three additional provincial road sections: (i) road from Jahan Khan to FaizuLarro via Chak town, (29.1 km connecting N- 65 with N-55); (ii) road from Sehwan to Dadu (32 km); and (iii) road from Tando Allahyar to (19 km). 2. For this purpose, frequent field visits along with field staff of Supervision Consultants were undertaken from July to December 2019 to assess if project impacts are avoided based on design changes and if there are emerging IR issues during implementation. For this purpose all the 9 subproject roads were visited. 3. Public consultations with communities living around LAR areas and in project area were held with 36 shopkeepers and local people to seek their views on construction /rehabilitation of project roads. Meetings were also held with local residents of three additional roads to discuss probable project impacts and their mitigation measures. 2. STATUSOF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT THE TIME OF FIELD VISIT 4. The progress of construction works up to December 2019 in all the 6 sub-projects and three additional roads is given below which are at different stages of implementation. ICB-01: Thull to Kandhkot Section (44.0 Km) Achieved Progress: 100% ICB-02: Sheranpur to Ratodero Section (36.0 Km) Achieved Progress: 96% ICB-03: Khyber to Section (64.0 Km) Achieved Progress: 100% ICB-04: Sanghar to Mirpurkhas Section (63.0 Km) Achieved Progress: 100% ICB-05: Tando Muhammad Khan to Section (67.0 Km) Achieved Progress: 100% ICB-06: Digri to Naukot Section (54km) Achieved Progress: 100% ICB-07: LOT-1 Tando Allahyar- Chamber Road (18KM) Construction Work is in progress ICB-07: LO-2 Sehwan- Dadu (32KM) Construction Work is in progress ICB-07: LOT-3 Jahan khan to FaizuLarro (29.1 KM) Construction Work is in progress

3. IMPLEMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTION ADJUSTMENTS TO AVOID IR IMPACTS 5. It has been observed that construction works in the encroached areas of Package- 1 sub-projects Thull to Kandhkot, Pacakage-2 Sheranpur and Package-6Digri to Naukot have been fully completed by effectively avoiding IR impacts as identified in DDR August 2017. 6. In Tando Jan Muhammad built up area of Package-6 sub-project Digri-Naukot road number of illegally extended portions of shops (encroachments) were demolished by the District Administration Mirpurkhas, Government of Sindh under its anti- encroachment drive, as per order of Supreme Court of Pakistan. Construction work has been completed, monitoring Team observed that the contractor has strictly followed the approved design of 7.3 meters of carriageway throughout the built up

4

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

area of Tando Jan Muhammad Bazaar. In this connection Special Due Diligence Report was prepared as required by ADB Mid-term Review Mission (MTR) and has been submitted to ADB. 4. INVOLUNTARY RESETTLEMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT ON ADDITIONALSUB-PROJECTS 7. Construction activities have been started on proposed additional three sub- projects 8. On LOT-1 road Tando Allahyar To Chamber subproject, available road width was measured which is found11.30 meter throughout the road section with an exception of 10.5 m at village Fazul Mandri chainage10+500 where a mosque is located at the edge of road. Damage to the mosque has been avoided by reducing shoulders by about 0.40 m on both sides. 9. On LOT-2 Dadu-Sehwan road, available road width is sufficient for the main carriageway i.e. 7.3 meters particularly in local bazaar areas while at other bazaar areas more than 7.3 meters was available. However, At Wada Manhayoon town chainage 16+873 and chainage 17+00 only 7.0 to 8.5 m width is available. Therefore, the width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid any IR impacts. At chainage18+500 available carriageways width is just 6.0 m where a bridge and a shrine are located. The widening of bridge to be made on left side of the existing bridge, where sufficient land is available within ROW. 10. On LOT-3 Jahan Khan to Faizu Larro subproject, available road width is sufficient for the main carriageway i.e. 7.3 meters.

11. The three additional sub projects roads generally have sufficient available ROW (110 ft.) for the proposed civil works; the Executive Engineers of Provincial Highways Works and Services Department have confirmed (See Annexure-C). The construction limit for embankment on either side comprises maximum of 7.3 m (24 ft.) carriageway with 3.0 m (6.5 ft.) shoulders on either side total 13.3 m (37 ft.) to avoid the resettlement impact. However, there are 18 road sections where proposed work has been designed to avoid causing any impacts to the encroaching structures. 12. The observations and preliminary impact assessment findings for Additional sub project Roads are summarized below in Table-1.

5

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

TABLE-1: FINDINGS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES TO AVOID POTENTIAL LAR IMPACTS

Available Identified Location/ clear Design Solution to avoid LAR impact as per Findings/ Sr.# Potential width DDR Chainage LAR issues Observations from the Field Visit (Meter)

1. Tando Allahyar To Chamber (19 km)

Fazul Mandri 5 shops are located at the edge of road. During construction any damage to the 1.1 9+700 5 Shops 10.5 Shop should be avoided by reducing shoulders Monitoring team found that by about 0.40m on both sides. construction work is in progress and no damage has been done to A mosque is located at the edge of road. During Shops and mosque (Figure-1 and construction any damage to the mosque should Figure-2). 1.8 10+500 Mosque 10.5 be avoided by reducing shoulders by about 0.40m on both sides.

2. Sehwan To Dadu (32 km)

Monitoring team found that construction work is in progress Goth Ali Khanana the shoulder width is reduced within proposed width without 2.1 4+200 4 Houses 8.5 to about 0.5 m either side to avoid damages to causing any damage to houses houses. located at the site. (Figure-3).

Improvement of bridge at Indus Link of RBOD-I Bridge construction work is in would be within ROW of road and Irrigation progress without involving any Channel. No land acquisition would be required damage to standing crops. 2.2 6+200 Bridge 8.00 as the diversion could be provided within ROW of irrigation department and of highway department crossing each other. LAR impacts are completely avoided.

Construction work has not been The width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to started at this chainage however 2.6 9+700 Mosque 8.00 avoid any IR impacts and avoid damages to the resettlement impact is completely mosque. avoided due to reduction in carriageway.

Construction work has been Mosque, 2 Width of carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to completed and no damage is done to 2.10 10+340 Houses and 7.4 avoid damages to structures and graveyard. the structures and grave yard Graveyard. (Figure-4).

Construction work has not been Improvement/rehabilitation of bridge would be started at this chainage however 14+100 Bridge 8.00 within ROW of road and irrigation channel. this site has no resettlement impacts.

6

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

Available Identified Location/ clear Design Solution to avoid LAR impact as per Findings/ Sr.# Potential width DDR Chainage LAR issues Observations from the Field Visit (Meter)

Construction work has not been The impact would be avoided to confine the started at this chainage however 16+440 2 Shops 9.3 section width compatible with the available this site has no resettlement width instead of taking full ROW. impacts.

At Wada Manhayoon town, the width of Work in progress, it has been 16+873 House 7.0 carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid any IR observed that there is no impact or impacts. any damage to shop.

At Wada Manhayoon town, the width of Work in progress, but o impacts or 16+920 House 7.5 carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid any IR damage to shop. impacts.

Construction work is not started Animal At Wada Manhayoon town, the width of here yet however resettlement 16+940 Fodder 8.3 carriageway is reduced to 5.5m to avoid any IR impact would be completely Shed impacts. avoided by reduction in carriageway.

Construction work is not started Improvement/rehabilitation of bridge would be here yet however resettlement 16+800 Bridge 8.00 within ROW of road and irrigation channel. impact would be completely avoided.

Construction work is not started The impact would be avoided to confine the here yet however resettlement 16+440 2 Shops 9.3 section width compatible with the available impact would be completely width instead of taking full ROW. avoided.

3. Jahan Khan (N-65) To FaizuLarro (N-55) Road Section (29.1 km)

The impact would be avoided to confine the Monitoring Team observed that section width designed at 7.3 m main Work is in progress and no damage 3.1 0+000 6 Shops 10.3 carriageway and 1.5 m shoulders on either side, was done to Shops (Figure-5). adjusted with available width instead of taking full ROW.

The impact would be avoided to confine the Work in progress, it has been 3.2 6+000 2 Shops 10.5 section width compatible with the available observed that no damage to shop width instead of taking full ROW. was done (Figure-6).

The impact would be avoided to confine the Work in progress, it has been 3.3 7+300 4 Shops 10.7 section width compatible with the available observed that no damage to shop width instead of taking full ROW. was done (Figure-6).

The impact would be avoided to confine the Monitoring Team observed that 3.4 10+600 6 Shops 9.1 section width compatible with the available Work is in progress and no damage width instead of taking full ROW. was done to Shops. (Figure-6).

7

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

Available Identified Location/ clear Design Solution to avoid LAR impact as per Findings/ Sr.# Potential width DDR Chainage LAR issues Observations from the Field Visit (Meter)

No land acquisition would be required as the Construction work is not started diversion could be provided within ROW of here yet 3.5 23+760 Bridge 7.3 irrigation department and of highway department crossing each other.

FIGURE 1: NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO HOUSE LOCATED AT CHAINAGE 09+700 LOT-1 TANDO ALLAYAR TO CHAMBER

8

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

FIGURE 3: CONSTRUCTION WORK IS IN PROGRESS AND NO DAMAGES WAS DONE TO THE HOUSES LOCATED AT CHAINAGE AT 04+200 LOT-2 SEHWAN-DADU ROAD

FIGURE 4: CONSTRUCTION WORK IN PROGRESS NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO MOSQUE & GRAVEYARD AT CHAINAGE 10+360 LOT-2 SEHWAN-DADU ROAD

9

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

FIGURE 5: CONSTRUCTION WORK IS IN PROGRESS & NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO SHOPS AT CH: 00+000 LOT-3 JEHAN KHAN TO CHAK SECTION SUB-PROJECT

FIGURE-6: CONSTRUCTION WORK IS IN PROGRESS & NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO SHOPS LOCATED AT EDGE OF THE ROAD AT CH: 10+600 LOT-3 CHAK TO FAIZU LARO ROAD SECTION

10

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

FIGURE-7: NO LAND ACQUISITION IS REQUIRED AT LOT-3 CHAK TO FAIZU LARO ROAD SECTION

5. CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION OF BRIDGES 13. There is no bridge located at LOT-01 Tando Allahyar to Chamber sub-project road. There are 3 bridges each are located at LOT-02 Sehwan-Dadu sub-project road & LOT-03 Jehan Khan to Faizu Laro respectively as given in Table-03.

14. The monitoring team visited all the bridges and observed that work has not been started yet. Team observed that Construction/rehabilitation work not involved any Land acquisition and IR impacts.

TABLE-2: PROGRESS REGARDING CONSTRUCTION/REHABILITAION OF BRIDGES

SR. NO. CHAINAGE NATUREOFWORK PROGRESS IR IMPACT ICB-07: LOT-2 SEHWAN RAILWAY CROSSING (N-55) TO DADU VIA TALTI UPTO DADU - MORO ROAD SECTION (32 KM) Reconstruction 1 06+200 Work in Progress No 2 14+100 Rehabilitation Work yet to start No 3 16+800 Rehabilitation Work yet to start No ICB-07: LOT-3 JEHAN KHAN TO FAIZU LARO VIA CHAK RUSTAM ROAD SECTION (29.1 KM) 1 07+000 Reconstruction Work yet to start No 2 23+760 Rehabilitation Work yet to start No

11

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

6. MEASURES TO ADDRESS POTENTIAL OF ACCIDENTAL DAMAGE 15. The DDR also identified urban sections where there is a high risk of accidental damage to structures during construction and proposed measures to address the risk. Project Team visited all the sections mentioned in DDR and verified measures taken by contractors in compliance of ADB Safeguard Policy Statement to avoid potential damages as given in Table-03 below

TABLE-3: FINDINGS ON MEASURES TO AVOID ACCIDENTAL DAMAGES

Available Supervision Location/ Measures to Avoid Accidental Damages as per DDR 9 ROW width Responsibility Findings Chainage With Risks 1. LOT-01) 9.7m During construction, one lane will be closed for Contractor Project work is in Tando traffic while the other lane is used for traffic and progress. There were no Allahyar to movement. The contractor will manage flagman Supervision accidental damages were Chamber either sides with steel pegs and construction area Consultants reported. Sub Section cover with red tape. The road safety signs like “men (SC) It was observed and at work” heavy machinery working” etc. will be verified that safety erected at appropriate locations. measures are being adopted by the Upon completion of the works, proper safety contractors to avoid measures like traffic signs and road marking will be accidental damages adopted. Signs starting at 500m before the area will during the construction of be erected at interval of 100m. Warning signs like the road. Contractors have taken following measures Reduce Speed, Road Getting Narrow will be erected. for this purpose: Cat eyes will also be used. 2. LOT-02) 7.9m During construction, one lane will be closed for Contractor Construction work is not Dadu traffic and other lane will use for traffic movement. and yet started. However Sehwan The contractor will manage flagman either sides Supervision safety measures would be with steel pegs and construction area cover with Consultants provided effectively as per red tape. The road safety signs like “men at work” (SC) requirement. heavy machinery working” etc. will be erected at appropriate locations.

Upon completion of the works, proper safety measures like traffic signs and road marking will be adopted. Signs starting at 500 m before the area will be erected at interval of 100m. Warning signs like Reduce Speed, Road Getting Narrow will be erected. Cat eyes will also be used. 3. LOT-03) 13m In operation phase Proper safety measures like Contractor Safety measures like Jehan Khan traffic signs and road marking will be adopted. and road marking have to Chak via Signs starting from a distance of 500m before Supervision been taken to guide the Rustam entering LAR area will be erected at interval of Consultants traffic for safe 100m. Warning signs like Reduce Speed, Road (SC) movement. Getting Narrow, sing of LAR area ahead will be used and erected. Cat eyes will also be used.

 Warning signs have been placed at least from one kilometer ahead of hazard locations. The subsequent signs are erected at 500, 300, 100 and 50 meters respectively. The signs are followed by road marking and reflective road studs, till the hazard location. This has been adopted both at entering and exiting the hazard locations.

 Safety measures like road marking have been taken to guide the traffic for safe movement. Traffic road signs, pavement marking is at place to ensure traffic safety.

12

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

Traffic road signs erected at appropriate distances to ensure safety of road users. The information signs coupled with warning signs as well as mandatory signs will make travelling safe for the road users as per international standards.

 Strom water drain is provided which is covered with concrete slab which will be sufficient to cover the protection and safety aspects.

FIGURE-8: Warning signs Placed at LOT-01 to avoid traffic FIGURE-9: Warning signs Placed at LOT-02 to avoid traffic accidents accidents

`FIGURE-10: Warning signs placed at LOT-03 to avoid traffic accidents

13

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

7. OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: IMPAIRED OR RESTRICTED ASSESS 16. During the field visit it was observed and confirmed by conducting interviews with local community that mobility of the local residents particularly of women and children and their livestock was not affected during construction activities such as excavation and dumping of construction materials due to excavation or dumping. 8. CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSUREOF INFORMATION

 Consultation meetings with 36 participants were carried out during the period from January 2019 to July 2019. Almost all the people consulted are very much satisfied with the widening and rehabilitation of roads. List of participants and their comments is given in Annexure-A.

 Transportation cost of Agriculture production has been reduced resulting in increase in Income

 Access to hospitals and educational institutions become comparatively more easy as it was very difficult to reach hospitals before improvement of road net work

 Business opportunities have been opened up; previously travelers never stop to take food or tea due to dust and other environmental hazards. Due to construction of Road network dust and other problems have been eliminated. Therefore, new tea stalls and restaurants started opening. 9. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM  In compliance of ADB Safeguard Policy Statement 2009, the main functions of the GRM as per DDR are:  Provide a mechanism to the local people on problems arising as a result of project activities,  Record the grievance of the APs, categorize and prioritize the grievances that need to be resolved, and  Report to the aggrieved parties about the developments regarding their grievances and the decision of the project authorities.  The project management will adopt a policy of preventing grievances rather than going through a redress process. This will be achieved through careful development of the compensation procedure and its implementation, by ensuring full participation and consultation with the people by maintaining effective communication and coordination between the communities. 17. A Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)has been established under Deputy Director (Safeguards Quality Control) of PMU, as chairman assisted by Executive Engineer, SPRIP (Upper Division), Executive Engineer, SPRIP (Lower Division), Assistant Engineer-SPRIP, Resettlement Specialist PMC and Environmental Specialist PMC the Social Complaint Register (SCR) is maintained at all the six work sites.

18. Under the GRM, a Local Grievance Redressal Committee (LGRC) as per the ADB guidelines has been constituted for ICB-SPRIP-07 (LOT-2) Sehwan Railway Crossing (N-55) to Dadu via Talti up to Dadu [Moro Road Section (32 Km).The

14

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

LGRC will record, review and redress grievances/disputes regarding environmental or resettlement issues that may pop-up during implementation of project works, including but not limited to construction works. The LGRC shall meet once a month at least. In addition, it shall hold meeting as and when required, particularly in case of any complaints. The LGRC is composed of following PMU and PMC staff members :-

1. Executive Engineer (Lower Division) Chairman Sindh Provincial Roads Improvement Project (SPRIP), Hyderabad 2. Assistant Engineer (Concerned) Sindh Provincial Roads Improvement Project (SPRIP), Hyderabad 3. Resident Engineer (Concerned) Sindh Provincial Roads Improvement Project (SPRIP),(PMC). 4. Local notable/Public Representative (with the approval of chairman) 5. Safeguard Specialist (Resettlement/Environment)

Functions and Responsibilities of the committee are:- i) To prepare a register to enter each and every complaint ,either received directly from the local community and Displaced Persons (DPs) or through other media i.e. outside agencies ( Contractor , Supervision Consultants or ADB);

ii) To screen, categorize and record complaints under separate headings i.e Social and Environmental with subcategories according to the issue involved.

iii) To issue acknowledgments to the complainants about their complaint received and conduct field investigation to determine and assess complainants concerns, eligibility and actions, to be implemented as per Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) or Environmental Management Plan (EMP) provisions, to resolve the complaint;

iv) To ensure that all field visits and consultations with the Affected Persons (APS) are properly documented, snapped and recorded. Copies of such records are placed in the PIU at site and record in original is maintained in the LGRC at PMU;

v) To review and record including report on complaint and visit the site (if deemed necessary), summons the complainant for hearing and to recommended the remedial measures consistent with LARP/EMP provisions, to resolve the issue;

vi) To disclose/disseminate information about progress on complaints and communicate the decision/recommendations to the complainant and PIU/PMU for implementation;

vii) Follow- up on implementation of recommended measures and clouser of the complaint file with prior approval from the PMU head;

15

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

viii) To reviews and report progress regarding complaints received/disposed and ensure such progress is included I the project progress and Social and Environmental monitoring reports.

9.1. FUNCTIONING OF GRM LGRC is operational under GRM and all its members are performing their tasks very effectively for quick resolution of complaints and queries. The field staff of supervision consultants is in close cooperation with the local people at site of work, they also receive and process the complaints and queries from the people including all stake holders and resolve the issue with the guidance of Resettlement Specialist and the members of LGRC.

In October 2019 ADB received requests from Social Reformer Mr. Abdul Ghafoor Siyal , regarding following issues on LOT-2 Sehwan Railway Crossing (N-55) To Dadu via Talti up to Dadu-Moro Road Section (32Km).

i. No proper usage quality material in construction of water-course Bridge/(s) of this road ii. No proper cutting & expansion of embankments iii. Technical issues of culverts have also raised iv. No proper planning how to use approved material i.e. gravel & bricks v. Material over dumping i.e. soil/gravel causing to be effecting the compaction standards layer to layer vi. Pre-selected lands whose soil samples collected for Lab-testing after such materials is useable for earthwork but those site still which are being selected randomly wherefrom no samples are collected for lab-test so same non-tested material is brought to use for earthwork vii. Random selection of different kind of soils are being effected directly to the quality of earthwork

A meeting of LGRC was conveyed on 25-10-2019 @3pm at PMU office Hyderabad Sindh. A prompt action was taken by LGRC and resolved the demands of complainant Mr. Abdul Ghafoor Siyal to his entire satisfaction.

Mr. Abdul Ghafoor Siyal was fully satisfied with the outcome of the meeting & thanked the committee for prompt response to his complaints. (Annexure-D)

9.2. OBSERVATION / FINDING  The local people said that the contractor’s Project Manager, Field Consultants, RS and PMU field Staff are cooperative and they have successfully avoided any impact over their personal and business activities. However 5 complaints on ICB-01 and 02 have been received regarding mobility of customers and females, which were satisfied by the contractor’s staff through proper management of work activity. In addition six (06) queries regarding completion time of individual activity, working hours, completion of project were received which were satisfied by the consultants field staffs.

10. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

 Based on observations and consultations conducted during the field visit, the following conclusions can be derived:

 Contractors are doing construction works in compliance with recommended mitigation measures as provided in the DDR .No damage to shops or other properties was found during field visit , similarly no traffic accident was reported by the shopkeepers and other community people due to proper safety measures adopted by the contractors..

 Public consultations and information disclosure meetings created awareness and confidence regarding their fundamental rights to express their reservations regarding any shortfalls they observe in implementation of the project. People were very much convinced and satisfied with the disclosure process.

Based on these conclusions, the following are recommended

 There is still a risk of accidental damages to road side structures i.e. shops, residential houses and religious or community structures during operation phase and for the remaining construction period. Continuous monitoring during construction phase and for the remaining construction work and the mitigation measures as described in the DDR is still required.

 To ensure that contractors implement the design adjustments in the remaining road sections, and measures to avoid/reduce risk of accidental damage as provided in the DDR, PMU should send a reminder communication to all contractors to ensure their compliance to the measures in the DDR;

 PMU in cooperation with PMC monitoring grievance redress process, ensure continuous liaison with Grievance Focal Points as well as PMU, and regularly inform ADB on actions taken on received complaints, their status and constraints in resolving those complaints if any..

 Lastly, it is recommended that the next monitoring report will be submitted to ADB for review on July 2020.The monitoring report will (i) review the implementation of the design adjustments and mitigation measures as provided in the DDR; (ii) identify any emerging IR issues in the remaining civil works under the project; (iii) review the implementation of the recommendations cited in Para 23; (iv) assess the consultation, information dissemination and grievance redress mechanism under the project; and (v) recommend corrective action plan, if needed.

11. MONITORING PLAN 19. The monitoring plan and its institutional requirements have been included in table below. The table identifies the effects of the construction of different project components on various social parameters. It also spells out mitigation/enhancement actions. The table also defines the responsibilities of various actors, viz. Proponent, Contractor and the Engineer in the implementation and monitoring of the mitigation actions.

11.1 OBJECTIVES OF MONITORING PLAN

17

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

20. This plan will help PMU to address the accidental impact of the project, enhance project benefits. The primary objectives of the plan are to:

Define the responsibilities of project proponents, contractors and other role players, and effectively communicate social issues among them.

Facilitate the implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the DDR by providing the details of each project accidental/ unforeseen impacts.

Define a monitoring mechanism and identify monitoring parameters to ensure that all mitigation measures are completely and effectively implemented.

18

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

TABLE MONITORING PLAN Responsibilities Stage of Resources Accidental Receptors Mitigation project Description Implementation Supervision Impacts *Effect on general *The Contractor will ensure mobility. that the mobility of the local Social During – *Accessibility of communities, particularly Local people Contractor PMU/SC Impact Construction the local women and children and their population to the livestock is not hindered by the access road. construction activities. The contractor will ensure the effective construction controls by the Contractor to avoid inconvenience to the locals due to noise, smoke and fugitive 1. Impacts dust. The contractor will *Community will on general frequently sprinkle water at the During – have to face the Local mobility of work areas and haul tracks to Contractor PMU/SC Construction noise and dust Communities Locals avoid generation of fugitive hazards. dust. The frequency of sprinkling will be determined by the weather condition. During long spell of hot and dry weather the sprinkling will be done after 2 or 3 hour intervals. The presence of The Contractor will be required outside to maintain close liaison with During – All social construction the local communities to ensure Contractor PMU/SC Construction Components workers that any potential conflicts inevitably causes related to common resource

19

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

TABLE MONITORING PLAN Responsibilities Stage of Resources Accidental Receptors Mitigation project Description Implementation Supervision Impacts some degree of utilization for the project social disruption. purposes are resolved quickly. Complying with the safety Occurrence of precautions for construction accidents/inciden workers as per International 2. Safety Construction Construction ts during the Labor Organization (ILO) Contractor PMU/SC Hazards Crew construction Convention No. 62, as far as activities. applicable to the project contract. If the construction work accidentally 3. Private damaged/affected The Contractor will rebuilding Houses or Construction Local People Contractor PMU/SC private structures the damaged structures Shops (houses) need to be compensation If accidentally damage any 4.Religious community / , Cultural religious (Masjid) The Contractor will rebuilding and Construction structures/histori Local People Contractor PMU/SC the damaged structures Historical cal or Sites archeological due to construction work.

20

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

ANNEXURE A Consultations with Local People &Notables

21

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

Table-1 A: Consultations with Local People &Notables of (ICB-07, LOT-01)TANDO ALLAHYAR TO CHAMBER SUB SECTION

Serial Location/ Contact Date Name of Main Participants Results of Consultations NO. Venue Details Muhammad Siddique Baloch 1. 12-Dec-2019 Fazul Stop S/o Khan Muhammad 2. 12-Dec-2019 Fazul Stop Nazir Ahmed S/o Kareem Bux 3. 12-Dec-2019 Fazul Stop Molehu S/o Mumlo Respondents were very much 4. 12-Dec-2019 Fazul Stop Manak S/o Kamal satisfied with the road project. 5. 12-Dec-2019 Fazul Stop Asghar S/o Niyaz Muhammad According to them journey time to Din Muhammad S/o Qadir Bux major cities & emergency visits to 6. 12-Dec-2019 Fazul Stop Muneer hospitals will be facilitate with 7. 12-Dec-2019 Fazul Stop Raheem S/o Nathoo higher speeds. 8. 12-Dec-2019 Fazul Stop Javed S/o Din Muhammad Ali Ahmed S/o Muhammad 9. 12-Dec-2019 Fazul Stop Bux

Table-2 A: Consultations with Local People &Notables of (ICB-07, LOT-02) Dadu Sehwan

Name of Main Serial NO. Date Location/ Venue Contact Details Views /Concerns Participants Faroque Ahmed S/o 10. 12-Dec-2019 Khushk Bazar Muhammad Saleh Shams-Ud-Din S/o 11. 12-Dec-2019 Khushk Bazar Muhammad Bachoo Dost Muhammad S/o 12. 12-Dec-2019 Khushk Bazar Muhammad Usman Nazeer Ahmed S/o Safe & easy Visit to Sehwan 13. 12-Dec-2019 Khushk Bazar Durr Muhammad Shareef Dargah Business Ameer Ali S/o opportunities will be 14. 12-Dec-2019 Khushk Bazar Muhammad Saleh opened up.

Mehboob Ali S/o 15. 12-Dec-2019 Khushk Bazar Hassan Ali

Ghulam Nabi S/o 16. 12-Dec-2019 Wada Manahiyoon Muhammad Urs Ghulam Ali S/o Darya 17. 12-Dec-2019 Wada Manahiyoon Khan Abdul Ghaffar S/o 18. 12-Dec-2019 Wada Manahiyoon Lashari Sahib 19. 12-Dec-2019 Wada Manahiyoon Mustafa S/o Kashmir Local People Should be Habib Shah S/o 20. 12-Dec-2019 Wada Manahiyoon employed on the project Sultan Shah Shoukat S/o Sher 21. 12-Dec-2019 Wada Manahiyoon Muhammad Zuhaib Din S/o Seraj 22. 12-Dec-2019 Wada Manahiyoon Din

22

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

Table 3A: Consultations with Local People &Notables (ICB-07, LOT-03) Jehan Khan to Chak via Rustam

Name of Main Serial NO. Date Location/ Venue Contact Details Views /Concerns Participants

Ali Nawaz S/o 23. 13-Dec-2019 Jehan Khan Muhammad Iqbal 24. 13-Dec-2019 Jehan Khan Shoukat Ali S/o Peer Bux Muharram Ali Shah S/o 25. 13-Dec-2019 Jehan Khan Syed Maddan Shah Faheem S/o Abdul 26. 13-Dec-2019 Jehan Khan Majeed Speedy approach to main GulBahar S/o Raheem cities of the Sindh. Business 27. 13-Dec-2019 Jehan Khan Bux opportunities will increase Muhammad Bux S/o 28. 13-Dec-2019 Jehan Khan Dildar Bux Muhammad Yousuf S/o 29. 13-Dec-2019 Jehan Khan Muhammad Sachal Abdul Qayoom S/o 13-Dec-2019 Jehan Khan 30. Muhammad Habib Muhammad Shutal S/o 13-Dec-2019 Naper Goth 31. Muhammad Hayat Almost all the people Naper Goth MolviSajan S/o Ameer consulted were very much 13-Dec-2019 32. Bux satisfied with the widening Naper Goth Riyaz Ali S/o Nazeer and rehabilitation of roads. 13-Dec-2019 33. Ahmed Due to construction of Road network dust and other Naper Goth Muhammad Aslam S/o 13-Dec-2019 problems have been 34. Saifullah eliminated. Therefore, new Naper Goth tea stalls and restaurants 13-Dec-2019 Afzal S/o GulBehaar 35. started opening. Naper Goth Ashfaque Ahmed S/o 13-Dec-2019 36. Shah Dino

23

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

ANNEXURE-B

PICTORIAL PRESENTATION

24

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

PICTORIAL PRESENTATION OFPROJECTDISCLOSUREBYRESETTLEMENT SPECIALIST AND STAKEHOLD REVEIWSREGARDINGSUB-PROJECTSROADS

CONSULTATION SESSION LOT-01 TANDO ALLAHYAR TO CHAMBER

25

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

CONSULTATION SESSION TO LOT-2 SEHWAN RAILWAY CROSSING (N-55) TO DADU VIA TALTI UPTO DADU - MORO ROAD

26

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

CONSULTATION SESSION TO LOT-3 JEHAN KHAN TO FAIZU LARO VIA CHAK RUSTAM ROAD SECTION

27

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

ANNEXURE-C Letters for ROW

28

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

29

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

30

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

31

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

ANNEXURE-D MINUTES OF MEETING GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE

(GRC)

32

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

33

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

34

Bi-Annual Monitoring Report (Jul-Dec 2019)

35