DOCSLIB.ORG

319.56–2G 7 CFR Ch

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
319.56–2G 7 CFR Ch § 319.56–2g 7 CFR Ch. III (1–1–02 Edition) § 300.1 of this chapter. The cold treat- boxes must be clearly marked with all ment must be conducted in accordance the information required by paragraph with the requirements of § 319.56–2d of (c)(6) of this section. this subpart. (Approved by the Office of Management and (f) Disease detection. If, during the Budget under control number 0579–0134) course of any inspection or testing re- quired by this section or § 319.56–6 of [65 FR 37668, June 15, 2000] this subpart, or at any other time, cit- § 319.56–2g Administrative instruc- rus black spot or sweet orange scab is tions prescribing method of treat- detected on any grapefruit, lemons, or ment of garlic from specified coun- oranges, APHIS and SENASA must be tries. notified and the grove in which the (a) Except as otherwise provided in fruit was grown or is being grown shall these administrative instructions, fu- be removed from the SENASA citrus migation with methyl bromide in vacu- export program for the remainder of um fumigation chambers, in accord- that year’s growing and harvest season, ance with the Plant Protection and and the fruit harvested from that grove Quarantine Treatment Manual, which may not be imported into the United is incorporated by reference at § 300.1 of States from the time of detection this chapter, is a condition of entry through the remainder of that shipping under permit for all shipments of garlic season. (Allium sativum) from Algeria, Armenia, (g) Limitations on distribution. The dis- Austria, Azerbaijan, Czech Republic, tribution of the grapefruit, lemons, and Egypt, Estonia, France, Georgia, Ger- oranges is limited to the continental many, Greece, Hungary, Iran, Israel, United States (the 48 contiguous Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Mo- States, Alaska, and the District of Co- rocco, Portugal, Romania, the area of lumbia.). In addition, during the 2000 the Russian Federation west of the through 2003 shipping seasons, the dis- Ural Mountains, Slovakia, South Afri- tribution of the grapefruit, lemons, and ca (Republic of), Spain, Switzerland, oranges is further limited as follows: Syria, Turkey, Ukraine, and the area (1) During the 2000 and 2001 shipping of the former Yugoslavia. Fumigation seasons, the fruit may be distributed in is to be carried out under the super- all areas of the continental United vision of a plant quarantine inspector States except Alabama, Arizona, Ar- and at the expense of the importer. kansas, California, Colorado, Florida, While it is believed that the garlic will Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ne- be unaffected by the fumigation, the vada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, treatment will be at the importer’s Texas, and Utah. risk. Such entry will be limited to (2) During the 2002 and 2003 shipping ports named in the permits, where ap- seasons, the fruit may be distributed in proved facilities for vacuum fumiga- all areas of the continental United tion with methyl bromide are avail- States except Arizona, California, Flor- able. ida, Louisiana, and Texas. (b)(1) The following alternate proce- (3) For the 2004 shipping season and dure is approved by the Deputy Admin- beyond, the fruit may be distributed in istrator of the Plant Protection and all areas of the continental United Quarantine Programs as a condition of States. entry under permit for shipments of (h) Ports of entry. The grapefruit, garlic (Allium sativum) from Italy and lemons, and oranges may enter the Spain: United States only through a port of (i) A certificate shall be obtained entry located in a State where the dis- from the appropriate phytosanitary of- tribution of the fruit is authorized pur- ficial of the country of origin to the ef- suant to paragraph (g) of this section. fect that such garlic is free of living (i) Repackaging. If any grapefruit, stages of Brachycerus spp. and lemons, or oranges are removed from Dyspessa ulula (Bkh.), said certifi- their original shipping boxes and re- cation to be based on field inspection packaged, the stickers required by and certification and subsequent reex- paragraph (c)(5) of this section may not amination at the port of departure be removed or obscured and the new prior to exportation. The 288 VerDate 11<MAY>2000 04:14 Jan 16, 2002 Jkt 197014 PO 00000 Frm 00288 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\197014T.XXX pfrm03 PsN: 197014T Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–2h phytosanitary certificate to be issued fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata), the Queens- by such official shall show the ship- land fruit fly (Dacus tryoni), and the ment to be either initially free from light brown apple moth (Epiphyas these pests or to have been fumigated. postvittana). (ii) The original copy of the (2) If an APHIS inspector finds evi- phytosanitary certificate shall be at- dence of any other insect pests for tached to the manifest accompanying which a treatment authorized in the the shipment. However, with the con- Plant Protection and Quarantine sent of the Plant Quarantine inspector, Treatment Manual is available, the the importer may arrange to have the grapes will remain eligible for importa- original phytosanitary certificate tion into the United States only if they mailed direct to the Inspector in are treated for the pests in Australia, Charge, Plant Protection and Quar- or at their first port of arrival in the antine Programs, at the port of entry, United States, under the supervision of if this will expedite inspection and re- an APHIS inspector. lease of certified shipments. If such an (b) Authorized treatments. Authorized arrangement is made, a copy of the treatments are listed in the Plant Pro- phytosanitary certificate shall be at- tection and Quarantine Treatment tached to the manifest accompanying Manual, which is incorporated by ref- the shipment. erence. For the full identification of (iii) Shipments of certified Italian or this standard, see § 300.1 of this chap- Spanish garlic will be subject to in- ter, ‘‘Materials incorporated by ref- spection upon arrival in the United erence.’’ States and if found infested with living (c) Trust Fund Agreement. Grapes that stages of Brachycerus spp. or Dyspessa undergo the fumigation phase of their ulula (Bkh.) shall be fumigated in ac- treatment in Australia may be im- cordance with paragraph (a) of this sec- ported into the United States only if tion. the national plant protection service of (2) The entry of certified garlic under Australia has entered into a trust fund the alternate procedure provided for in agreement with APHIS. This agree- paragraph (b)(1) of this section will be ment requires the national plant pro- limited to the ports named in para- tection service of Australia to pay in graph (a)(1) of this section or such advance all costs that APHIS esti- other ports as may subsequently be mates it will incur in providing serv- named in the permits. ices in Australia. These costs include (3) Continuance of the alternate pro- administrative expenses and all sala- cedure provided for in paragraph (b)(1) ries (including overtime and the Fed- of this section for the importation of eral share of employee benefits), travel Italian or Spanish garlic is contingent expenses, and other incidental expenses upon the satisfactory observance of incurred by APHIS inspectors in per- such procedure by the respective coun- forming these services. The agreement tries of origin. requires the national plant protection [24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 35 service of Australia to deposit a cer- FR 18385, Dec. 3, 1970; 36 FR 24917, Dec. 24, tified or cashier’s check with APHIS 1971. Redesignated at 50 FR 9788, Mar. 12, for the amount of these costs, as esti- 1985; 62 FR 50235, Sept. 25, 1997] mated by APHIS. If the deposit is not sufficient to meet all costs incurred by § 319.56–2h Regulations governing the APHIS, the agreement further requires entry of grapes from Australia. the national plant protection service of (a) Importations allowed. (1) Grapes Australia to deposit with APHIS a cer- from Australia may be imported into tified or cashier’s check for the amount the United States only if they are in- of the remaining costs, as determined spected by an inspector of the Animal by APHIS, before the grapes may be and Plant Health Inspection Service imported. After a final audit at the [APHIS], either in Australia or the conclusion of each shipping season, any United States, and treated with an au- overpayment of funds would be re- thorized treatment under the super- turned to the national plant protection vision of an APHIS inspector for the service of Australia, or held on account following pests: the Mediterranean until needed. 289 VerDate 11<MAY>2000 04:14 Jan 16, 2002 Jkt 197014 PO 00000 Frm 00289 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\197014T.XXX pfrm03 PsN: 197014T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–2H
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–2h pest conditions on arrival or to assure fect that such garlic is free of living himself of the effectiveness of the stages of Brachycerus spp. and treatment. Dyspessa ulula (Bkh.), said certifi- (c) The entry of cipollini from Mo- cation to be based on field inspection rocco may be made only through the and certification and subsequent reex- ports of New York and Boston at which amination at the port of departure ports facilities for vacuum fumigation prior to exportation. The with methyl bromide, as herein re- phytosanitary certificate to be issued quired, are available. by such official shall show the ship- [24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 50 ment to be either initially free from FR 9788, Mar. 12, 1985] these pests or to have been fumigated. (ii) The original copy of the § 319.56–2f [Reserved] phytosanitary certificate shall be at- tached to the manifest accompanying § 319.56–2g Administrative instruc- the shipment. However, with the con- tions prescribing method of treat- sent of the Plant Quarantine inspector, ment of garlic from specified coun- tries. the importer may arrange to have the original phytosanitary certificate (a) Except as otherwise provided in mailed direct to the Inspector in these administrative instructions, fu- Charge, Plant Protection and Quar- migation with methyl bromide in vacu- antine Programs, at the port of entry, um fumigation chambers, in accord- if this will expedite inspection and re- ance with the Plant Protection and lease of certified shipments. If such an Quarantine Treatment Manual, which arrangement is made, a copy of the is incorporated by reference at § 300.1 of phytosanitary certificate shall be at- this chapter, is a condition of entry tached to the manifest accompanying under permit for all shipments of garlic the shipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Page Photo
    Эверсманния. Энтомологические исследования Eversmannia в России и соседних регионах. Вып. 9. 20.III.2007: 11–33 No. 9. 2007. Р. В. Яковлев г. Барнаул, Алтайский государственный университет (Южно-Сибирский ботанический сад), Алтайский краевой институт повышения квалификации работников образования Древоточцы (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) России R.V. Yakovlev. Carpenter moths (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) of Russia. SUMMARY. In this article the catalogue of Cossidae of Russia is presented. An annotated list including 32 species has been compiled. Two new species and two new subspecies: Catopta albonubila argunica, ssp. n. (Locus typicus: East Trasbaicalia, Kuenga, 45 km SW. Sretensk), Catopta perunovi, sp. n. (Locus typicus: Russia, Altai Rep., near Ongudai), Cossus cossus dauricus, ssp. n. (Locus typicus: Russia Transbaikalia, Chita Province, Nizhnii Tsasutchei), Phragmataecia pacifica, sp. n. (Locus typicus: Russia, Dagestan, 5 km E. Urma) are described. Besides, a new species from S. Mongolia Catopta saldaitisi, sp. n. (Locus typicus: S. Mongolia, Omnogovi Aimak, the Gobi Altai Mts., Gurvan Sayhan) is described. For each species bibliography and distribution map are given. Проводимая в последние годы работа по исследованию древоточцев (Сossidae) Евразии при- вела к описанию ряда новых таксонов с территории Палеарктики, позволила установить грани- цы распространения многих видов. В данной работе делается попытка представить полный ка- талог древоточцев России, выполненный как на основании анализа литературных данных, так и на большом фактическом материале. Исследованный материал хранится в ряде коллекций Рос- сии, Украины, Германии, Австрии. Приведен аннотированный список видов, включающий дан- ные о первичном описании, синонимии, месте хранения типового материала и распростране- нии. Для редких и малоизвестных видов и для новых таксонов приводятся полные данные эти- кеток. Для каждого вида приведена карта распространения на территории России.
    [Show full text]
  • Tese Final Sandro.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA ESCOLA DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA Departamento de Biologia Aspetos morfológicos dos insetos e sua importância na polinização Sandro Melo Cerqueira Orientador: Anabela Belo Mestrado em Biologia da Conservação Dissertação Évora, 2015 UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA ESCOLA DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA Departamento de Biologia UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA ESCOLA DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA Aspetos morfológicos dos insetos e sua importância na polinização Sandro Melo Cerqueira Orientador: Anabela Belo Mestrado em Biologia da Conservação Dissertação Évora, 2015 ―O que torna as coisas desconcertantes é o seu grau de complexidade, não a sua dimensão; uma estrela é mais simples do que um inseto‖ - Martin Rees, 1999. In ―Evolution of Insects‖, David Grimaldi and Michael S. Engel, Cambridge University Press Agradecimentos Em primeiro lugar gostaria de agradecer á Associação ―A Rocha‖ pela disponibilidade em fornecer os meios logísticos e técnicos necessários para a execução deste trabalho, em especial á Prof. Paula Banza pela sua ajuda e disponibilidade, por me ter passado o seu conhecimento e me ter acompanhado ao longo de todo o trabalho. Obrigado Jens D‘Haeseleer pela ajuda na identificação dos insetos e Drª Renata Medeiros pela ajuda na parte estatística. Quero agradecer á Prof. Anabelo Belo pela sua orientação, apoio e comentários. E por fim, aos meus pais e ao meu irmão, por todo o apoio financeiro e incentivo dado. A todas as pessoas que de algum modo contribuíram para que fosse possível a realização desta dissertação, muito obrigado. Índice A. Índice de Tabelas --------------------------------------------------------------------------6 B. Índice de Figuras---------------------------------------------------------------------------7 C. Resumo---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9 D. Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 1. Introdução-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of the Moth Fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a Wetland Forest: a Case Study from Motovun Forest, Istria, Croatia
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 117, No 3, 399–414, 2015 CODEN PDBIAD DOI: 10.18054/pb.2015.117.3.2945 ISSN 0031-5362 original research article Diversity of the moth fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a wetland forest: A case study from Motovun forest, Istria, Croatia Abstract TONI KOREN1 KAJA VUKOTIĆ2 Background and Purpose: The Motovun forest located in the Mirna MITJA ČRNE3 river valley, central Istria, Croatia is one of the last lowland floodplain 1 Croatian Herpetological Society – Hyla, forests remaining in the Mediterranean area. Lipovac I. n. 7, 10000 Zagreb Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014 lepidopterological 2 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, research was carried out on 14 sampling sites in the area of Motovun forest. Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia The moth fauna was surveyed using standard light traps tents. 3 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, Results and Conclusions: Altogether 403 moth species were recorded Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia in the area, of which 65 can be considered at least partially hygrophilous. These results list the Motovun forest as one of the best surveyed regions in Correspondence: Toni Koren Croatia in respect of the moth fauna. The current study is the first of its kind [email protected] for the area and an important contribution to the knowledge of moth fauna of the Istria region, and also for Croatia in general. Key words: floodplain forest, wetland moth species INTRODUCTION uring the past 150 years, over 300 papers concerning the moths Dand butterflies of Croatia have been published (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of the Lokrum Island, Southern Dalmatia
    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 29 Suppl.No 2 1227-24051-57 ZAGREB DecemberMarch 31, 31, 2021 2020 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad DOI 10.20302/NC.2020.29.29 BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTERA) OF THE LOKRUM ISLAND, SOUTHERN DALMATIA Toni Koren Association Hyla, Lipovac I 7, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia (e-mail: [email protected]) Koren, T.: Butterflies and moths (Insecta: Lepidoptera) of the Lokrum island, southern Dalmatia. Nat. Croat., Vol. 29, No. 2, 227-240, 2020, Zagreb. In 2016 and 2017 a survey of the butterflies and moth fauna of the island of Lokrum, Dubrovnik was carried out. A total of 208 species were recorded, which, together with 15 species from the literature, raised the total number of known species to 223. The results of our survey can be used as a baseline for the study of future changes in the Lepidoptera composition on the island. In comparison with the lit- erature records, eight butterfly species can be regarded as extinct from the island. The most probable reason for extinction is the degradation of the grassland habitats due to the natural succession as well as the introduction of the European Rabbit and Indian Peafowl. Their presence has probably had a tremendously detrimental effect on the native flora and fauna of the island. To conserve the Lepidop- tera fauna of the island, and the still remaining biodiversity, immediate eradication of these introduced species is needed. Key words: Croatia, Adriatic islands, Elafiti, invasive species, distribution Koren, T.: Danji i noćni leptiri (Insecta: Lepidoptera) otoka Lokruma, južna Dalmacija. Nat. Croat., Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Country – Brazil
    DATE – 6/14/13 COUNTRY – BRAZIL SUMMARY REFERENCE - Same APPROVED NAME – Brazil COMMODITY – Almonds, Pistachios, Apricots, and Plums, Cherries BOTANICAL NAME – Prunus spp. & Pistacia vera PRODUCT FORM – Fruit & Nuts PHYTO FORM – Fed IMPORT PERMIT – No –Apricots, Plums, Pistachios Yes - Almonds RESTRICTIONS – Restricted – Almonds, Apricots, Plums, Pistachios SUMMARY INFO – (From CA) ALMONDS- Federal Phytosanitary Certificate and Import Permit are required PISTACHIOS – Federal Phytosanitary Certificate Required. PLUMS, APRICOTS, CHERRIES– Federal Phytosanitary Certificate Required AD REQUIRED: “The shipment is free of TETRANYCHUS PACIFICUS and BREVIPALPUS LEWISI.” OR: “The shipment has been treated in accordance with Treatment 15 for BREVIPALPUS LEWISI and TETRANYCHUS PACIFICUS.” NOTE: If the AD stating the product is free from Tetranychus pacificus and Brevipalpus lewisi is used, then the shipment MUST enter the following ports: Port of Santos, Guarulhos International Airport in San Paulo, International Airport of Recife/Guararapes Gilberto Freyre, and Ports of Recife and Suape, located in Pernambuco State. Notification must be given to DDIV (Department of Defense and Vegetable Inspection) in Brazil prior to arrival of the product. **Treatment schedule Fumigation-Methyl Bromide Treatment at origin. Treatment Concentration Temperature Duration Comments details must be 1.5 pounds/1000 ft³ 80+˚C 2 Hours Prunus Fruit recorded on PC. 2 pounds/ 1000 ft³ 70-79˚C 2 Hours Prunus Fruit 2.5 pounds/ 1000 ft³ 60-69˚C 2 Hours Prunus Frut 3 pounds/ 1000 ft³ 50-59˚C 2 Hours Prunus Fruit 4 pounds/1000 ft³ 40-49˚C 2 Hours Prunus Fruit NOTE TO EXPORTERS: For any product to be imported into Brazil a Siscomex import license must be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • 319.56–2F 7 CFR Ch
    § 319.56–2f 7 CFR Ch. III (1–1–04 Edition) § 319.56–2f [Reserved] (ii) The original copy of the phytosanitary certificate shall be at- § 319.56–2g Administrative instruc- tached to the manifest accompanying tions prescribing method of treat- the shipment. However, with the con- ment of garlic from specified coun- sent of the Plant Quarantine inspector, tries. the importer may arrange to have the (a) Except as otherwise provided in original phytosanitary certificate these administrative instructions, fu- mailed direct to the Inspector in migation with methyl bromide in vacu- Charge, Plant Protection and Quar- um fumigation chambers, in accord- antine Programs, at the port of entry, ance with the Plant Protection and if this will expedite inspection and re- Quarantine Treatment Manual, which lease of certified shipments. If such an is incorporated by reference at § 300.1 of arrangement is made, a copy of the this chapter, is a condition of entry phytosanitary certificate shall be at- under permit for all shipments of garlic tached to the manifest accompanying (Allium sativum) from Algeria, Armenia, the shipment. Austria, Azerbaijan, Czech Republic, (iii) Shipments of certified Italian or Egypt, Estonia, France, Georgia, Ger- Spanish garlic will be subject to in- many, Greece, Hungary, Iran, Israel, spection upon arrival in the United Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Mo- States and if found infested with living stages of Brachycerus spp. or Dyspessa rocco, Portugal, Romania, the area of ulula (Bkh.) shall be fumigated in ac- the Russian Federation west of the cordance with paragraph (a) of this sec- Ural Mountains, Slovakia, South Afri- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • N Achrichten
    ©Entomologischer Verein Apollo e.V. Frankfurt am Main; download unter www.zobodat.at N achrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo (e. V, gegr. 1897) Supplementum 10 Ernst BROCKMANN: Kommentierte Bibliographie zur Faunistik der hessischen Lepidopteren 1990 Frankfurt am Main ISSN 0723-9920 ©Entomologischer Verein Apollo e.V. Frankfurt am Main; download unter www.zobodat.at Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo Herausgeber Entomologischer Verein Apollo e. V.. Frankfurt am Main, ge­ gründet 1897. Erster Vorsitzender: Dr. Klaus G. Schurian. Schriftleitung verantwortlicher Redakteur: Wolfgang A. Nässig, Postfach 3063, D-6052 M uhlheim 3. Redaktionskomitee Dr. Wolfgang Eckweiler. Gronauer Str. 40, 6000 Frankfurt; Ernst Görgner, Wilhelmstraße 31, 6050 Offenbach; P. J. Hof­ mann, Bergstraße 40, 6477 Limeshain 3; Wolfgang A. Nässig. Postfach 3063, 605Z MUhlheim 3; Dr. Klaus G. Schurian, Am Mannstein 13, 6233 Kelkheim 2. Manuskripte an W. A. Nässig, Postfach 3063, D-6052 MUhlheim 3. Inhalt Die Autoren sind fUr den Inhalt ihrer Beiträge allein ver­ antwortlich; die Artikel geben nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung der Redaktion oder des Vereins wieder, Autorenrichtlinien sind kostenlos in der jeweils gültigen Version von der Redaktion (W. A. Nässig) erhältlich. Freiexemplare Die Autoren erhalten 50 Freiexemplare ihrer Artikel (Originalarbeiten); werden weitere 50 Exemplare zum Selbst­ kostenpreis gewünscht, so ist dies beim Einreichen des Manuskriptes zu vermerken. Farbtafeln Prinzipiell besteht die Möglichkeit, auch Farbtafeln drucken zu lassen. Die Finanzierung solcher Tafeln kann nicht durch den Verein erfolgen, sondern muß durch den Autor des Artikels organisiert werden. Interessierte Autoren wen­ den sich bitte an W. A. Nässig. Abonnement Jahresbeitrag z. Zt. DM 30-, Schüler und Studenten DM 15,-, AufnahmegebUhr DM 5,-.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcodes for Bio-Surveillance
    Genome DNA Barcodes for Bio -surveillance: Regulated and Economically Important Arthropod Plant Pests Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2016-0024.R2 Manuscript Type: Review Date Submitted by the Author: 16-Jul-2016 Complete List of Authors: Ashfaq, Muhammad; University of Guelph Biodiversity Institute of Ontario Hebert, Paul; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, species identification,Draft cryptic taxa, invasive species, quarantine, pest Keyword: management https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 73 Genome DNA Barcodes for Bio-surveillance: Regulated and Economically Important Arthropod Plant Pests Muhammad Ashfaq* and Paul D.N. Hebert Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada * Corresponding author: Draft Muhammad Ashfaq Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada Email: [email protected] Phone: (519) 824-4120 Ext. 56393 1 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Genome Page 2 of 73 Abstract Many of the arthropod species that are important pests of agriculture and forestry are impossible to discriminate morphologically throughout all of their life stages. Some cannot be differentiated at any life stage. Over the past decade, DNA barcoding has gained increasing adoption as a tool to both identify known species and to reveal cryptic taxa. Although there has not been a focused effort to develop a barcode library for them, reference sequences are now available for 77% of the 409 species of arthropods documented on major pest databases. Aside from developing the reference library needed to guide specimen identifications, past barcode studies have revealed that a significant fraction of arthropod pests are a complex of allied taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Cossidae)
    Die Puppen der mittel- und westeuropäischen Holzbohrer (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) J. PatoCka PATOCKA, J„ 2000. THE PUPAE OF THE CENTRAL AND WESTERN EUROPEAN COSSIDS (LEPIDOPTERA: COSSIDAE). - ENT. BER. AMST. 60 (4): 61-68. Abstract. Six species from six genera of Central and Western European cossid-pupae are described and figured. A key for identification of the subfamilies and genera and some biological data are added. Keywords: Lepidoptera, Cossidae, pupae, taxonomy, bionomics. Institut für Waldökologie der SAW, Sturova 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Republik Slowakei. Die vorliegende Arbeit behandelt die zugäng¬ Auch Clypeus meist mit Kanten- (Abb. 1, 2, lichen Puppen der mittel- und westeuropäi¬ 23) , bzw. Zahnstrukturen (Abb. 9, 10, 33). schen Cossidae (Lepidoptera, sechs Gattun¬ Labium mit Palpi labiales vorhanden ( Abb. 3, gen, sechs Arten). Die Puppen aus dieser 24) . Maxillae deutlich. Ihre Lappen (Probos¬ Familie sind bisher lückenhaft, ihre Bionomie cis) sehr kurz (Abb. 28, 29, 33) und oft von¬ jedoch relativ gut bekannt, weil die meisten einander isoliert (Abb. 3, 9). Palpi maxillares Arten Schädlinge sind. Eine Charakteristik der meist unterscheidbar (Abb. 3, 22). Antennae Lepidopteren-Puppen und Bestimmungstabel¬ kurz, viel kürzer als die Vorderflügel und kür¬ le ihrer mitteleuropäischen Überfamilien und zer auch als die Mittelbeine. Vorder- und Familien anhand der Puppenmerkmale bringt Mittelbeine relativ kurz (Abb. 1, 33). Vorder¬ Patocka (1999). Das System und die Nomen¬ schenkel groß. Vorderhüften (nicht immer von klatur folgen Karsholt & Razowski (1996) und den Vorderschenkeln deutlich differenziert, Leraut (1997), die puppenmorphologische Abb. 33) und oft auch Mittel- und Hinterhüf¬ Terminologie Mosher (1916). Das untersuchte ten vorhanden (Abb. 1). Enden der Hinter¬ Material stammt aus der Sammlung des beine sichtbar, kurz (Abb.
    [Show full text]
  • Cossidae (Lepidoptera) of Georgia. 1-16 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Jahr/Year: 2007 Band/Volume: 0028 Autor(en)/Author(s): Didmanidze Eteri A., Yakolev Roman V. Artikel/Article: Cossidae (Lepidoptera) of Georgia. 1-16 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Entomofauna ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR ENTOMOLOGIE Band 28, Heft 1: 1-16 ISSN 0250-4413 Ansfelden, 12. Jänner 2007 Cossidae (Lepidoptera) of Georgia DIDMANIDZE, Eteri A. & YAKOVLEV, Roman V. Abstract An annotated list of Cossidae of Georgia is for the first time given which includes 14 species. Zusammenfassung Erstmals wird eine kommentierte Liste der Cossidae von Georgien veröffentlicht, die 14 Arten umfasst. Introduction The first contributions to the systematic and faunistic knowledge on Lepidoptera of Transcaucasia were published by the Grand Duke N. M. ROMANOV (ROMANOFF, 1885); 1 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at they included some data on Cossidae. In this remarkable work, ROMANOV mentioned 10 cossid species for Transcaucasia, including 4 reported for Georgia. Further preliminary data on Cossidae of Georgia were already published by the first author in several papers (DIDMANIDZE, 1975, 1976, 1978, 1980; DIDMANIDZE & ZURASHVILI, 1981). Data on Cossidae of Abhasia were published by E. S. MILYANOVSKY (1964). A monographic work on Lepidoptera of arid landscapes of Georgia (DIDMANIDZE, 1978) contains data on life history and distribution of Cossidae, two of which were not identified to species, while the remaining 8 species were identified as follows: Cossus cossus L., Cossus terebra F., Zeuzera pyrina L., Catopta thrips Hb., Catopta caestrum caucasica Gr.-Gr., Dyspessa ulula Bkh., Dyspessa salicicola Ev., Dyspessa alpherakyi Chr.
    [Show full text]