DOCSLIB.ORG

Russia CFO Route to the Top 2019 Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russia CFO Route to the Top 2019 Edition Financial Officer Russia CFO Route to the Top 2019 edition A changing role for a maturing economy IntroductIon This report provides a fresh overview of Russia’s current serving genera- tion of chief financial officers. Our ongoing data analysis shows that: » 15% of the largest Russian companies changed CFOs in 2018. » The companies under review maintain a tradition of hiring CFOs inter- nally. That said, we observed a slight increase in external hiring in 2018, to a level last seen in 2016. » Those having served as divisional financial directors form the largest cohort of CFOs. » Average tenure continues to decline, to 5.4 years. » ACCA/CFA and MBA qualifications are more evident among the CFO population. » Women hold 20% of CFO positions among the top 100 companies, maintaining a gradual upwards trajectory in representation. » Average total annual compensation is $1.48m. russia cfo route to the top 2019 AGe The average age of CFOs remains stable at 45.3 years. Fast-paced consumer, TMT and financial services sectors tend to hire younger CFOs, closer in age to executives who occupy product and technol- ogy roles in these companies. However, the majority of Russian listed companies operate in the industrial sector, where the average age of CFOs is 46.5, a reflection of a maturing CFO function. Average age of CFOs . . Three-year analysis . . . Average age of CFOs by . . industry sector ▪ 2015 ▪ 2016 ▪ 2017 ▪ 2018 CON FS IND LS TMT The average age of CFOs at FTSE 100 companies is 52. Fortune 500 CFOs average 49.3 years (up from 44 years in 2005). Two CFOs at Russian companies were hired into the role at the age of 26. The youngest CFO among Fortune 500 companies was hired when he was 29 years old. Four CFOs among FTSE 100 companies were 32 when appointed. page 2 spencer stuart inteRnAL VS eXteRnAL HiRinG When Russian companies appoint a new CFO they tend to draw from internal talent pool (59% in 2018) rather than hiring an external candidate (41%). Internal vs. External % % % % CFO appointments % % % % ▪ Internal ▪ External % % % % % % % % % Internal CFO appointments % %% % % % % % by industry sector % ▪ 2015 ▪ 2016 % %%% % ▪ 2017 ▪ 2018 % % % % CON FS IND LS TMT However, the decrease in internal promotions in 2018 could indicate talent shortages inside some Russian companies, possibly as a result of low renewal rates among senior management tiers in the biggest companies. At the moment, most companies have a good choice of senior professionals for the CFO role — either experienced external candidates or internal candi- date with the potential to become a fully pledged CFO. While companies may be saving costs with an internal promotion, they usually have to increase the compensation for a CFO after the first year in the role. 65% of FTSE 100 CFOs are internal promotions, while Fortune 500 compa- nies have 67% of internally promoted CFOs. The proportion of internal hires at Fortune 500 companies has been gradually growing for the last 11 years, from 61% in 2007 to a peak of 69% in 2016. russia cfo route to the top 2019 page 3 russia cfo route to the top 2019 PReVioUS eXPeRienCe Expectations of a CFO’s previous experience are changing Our review showed no dramatic shift in where demand is directed, although we do note a rise in interest from selection committees in FP&A professionals. That aside, divisional financial directors and former CFOs continue make up the primary talent pool for future CFO roles. Previous functional experience, by role 2015 2016 2017 2018 CFO 29% 26% 21% 23% DFD 22% 26% 31% 30% Controlling 11% 11% 12% 11% Corporate Finance / M&A 10% 9% 7% 7% GM 8% 9% 4% 1% Reporting 7% 4% 10% 9% FP&A 3% 3% 7% 8% IR 3% 3% 2% 3% Treasury 3% 3% 2% 2% Risk 2% 2% 2% 2% Non-finance 2% 2% 1% 2% The number of experienced CFOs has grown slightly in 2018, but the trend for newly promoted CFOs is clear. Among FTSE 100 companies 44% of CFOs have previous CFO experience. It is interesting to observe the oppo- site dynamics in Fortune 500 companies — only 31% of F500 CFOs have previous CFO experience, compared with 24% in 2006. page 4 spencer stuart tenURe Average CFO tenure has fallen slightly, to 5.4 years. We note that many companies with a ‘short CFO cycle’ changed their CFO again in 2018, so the shorter average tenure we are seeing does not indicate a specific trend on the Russian market. % % New CFOs among top 100 % % companies % % Percentage of companies with CFO hired in the past year . Average tenure of CFOs Years in current role . Average tenure of CFOs . . by sector . ▪ 2015 ▪ 2016 ▪ 2017 . CON FS IND LS TMT The average CFO tenure at Fortune 500 companies has been stable, remain- ing within 5–6 years since 2006 (it was 5.6 years in 2018). The tenure of FTSE 100 CFOs in 2018 was 5.3 years. 15% of companies appointed a new CFO, slightly fewer than in 2017. Annual CFO turnover among Fortune 500 companies averages 14%. Among FTSE 100 companies, 17% had new CFO in 2018. russia cfo route to the top 2019 page 5 russia cfo route to the top 2019 edUCAtion Levels of education and professional qualifications among Russian CFOs continue to strengthen: we see more qualified accountants and PhDs in 2018. % % CFO education % % 2015 2016 2017 % ▪ ▪ ▪ % % % % % % % % % % % % % % MBA ACCA Ph.D. CFA A competitive talent market tends to push up education expectations and to increase professionalisation in the function. To drive a CFO agenda, solid financial acumen is essential. From our experience, the decision to select a candidate for a CFO role is driven by more than education. But we note a correlation between a strong professional education and career progress in blue-chip companies. Our survey shows, that only 6% of international CFOs hold a PhD compared with 15% of Russian CFOs. 13% of UK CFOs have an MBA compared with 24% in Russia. In the US, 48% of Fortune 500 CFOs have an MBA degree and 36% have CPA. page 6 spencer stuart diVeRSitY Gender diversity among the Russian CFO pool continues to grow, despite no official target existing. % % % % CFO Diversity ▪ Male ▪ Female % % % % One in five CFOs among the country’s top 100 companies is a woman. The population of women at the less senior tiers of financial departments is wider still, so we expect to see more women represented at CFO level in the future. Just 14% of FTSE 100 CFOs are women and 13% of F500 CFOs (compared with 7% in 2006) — both less than the 20% recorded in Russia. ComPenSAtion Wide variations in levels of CFO compensation are present among the companies in our sample. Although average figures can illuminate general compensation practices, they cannot be used for detailed analysis. Some CFOs at the largest compa- nies receive substantial long-term incentive payments, and as a result their total compensation greatly exceeds the average. We have noted some indicative figures that can help to gauge the current CFO market, however. The average base salary is ₽27.7 million, the average annual bonus is ₽29.9 million, and the average annualized LTI is ₽34.9 million. Total average compensation for a CFO is ₽92.5 million, or $1.48 million. russia cfo route to the top 2019 page 7 russia cfo route to the top A modern CFO for a modern board The role of the CFO continues to grow swiftly in » Boards need to know that a CFO will admit to complexity and scope, making the CFO one of the mistakes (the loss of market positions due to most important — and most scrutinised — execu- poor planning/analysis, for example). The real tive appointments the board will make. threats these days come from those who believe they do not make mistakes. Effective nomination committees expect an » Strong collaborating capabilities. Results are incoming CFO to step beyond the role’s already driven by the team, not by an individual. demanding fiscal responsibilities. He or she must Evidence of deep strategic awareness, of what demonstrate that they are comfortable helping to » is going on in the sector and other industries, shape strategy or operational matters, or advising of partnerships that could benefit the the board on risk and compliance decisions. This organisation. demanding slate of skills is enhanced by the kind of rapport and communication capabilities on » Good communication skills — an effective which trusted relationships are built. CFO must explain to the board and investors the workings of product lines and business Through its work with Russian and international divisions alike. boards in the country, Spencer Stuart has identi- » Experience of different cultures, which adds a fied patterns often present in CFO selection and global sensibility. decision-making processes. Some of our insight in particular emerges from our work with audit committee members, who deal with CFOs more closely than chairs or members of nomination committees. The following are the qualities and skills that boards most frequently seek in a CFO: » Boards want CFOs who can engage in a con- structive fashion, rather than either agreeing or arguing with everything. Soft challenges to others’ opinions are often encouraged within boards; hostile or critical attacks are not. A successful CFO uses open questions rather than open criticism. » Experience that speaks to honesty and integrity has a high value. The interests of stakeholders — including customers and investors — take precedence; personal agendas — promotion, bonus, ego — come last. page 8 spencer stuart metHodoLoGY The research uses data drawn from public sources and Spencer Stuart research that analyses the professional background and career paths of CFOs of the largest Russian public companies by market capitalisation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Expiry Notice
    Expiry Notice 19 January 2018 London Stock Exchange Derivatives Expiration prices for IOB Derivatives Please find below expiration prices for IOB products expiring in January 2018: Underlying Code Underlying Name Expiration Price AFID AFI DEVELOPMENT PLC 0.1800 ATAD PJSC TATNEFT 58.2800 FIVE X5 RETAIL GROUP NV 39.2400 GAZ GAZPROM NEFT 23.4000 GLTR GLOBALTRANS INVESTMENT PLC 9.9500 HSBK JSC HALYK SAVINGS BANK OF KAZAKHSTAN 12.4000 HYDR PJSC RUSHYDRO 1.3440 KMG JSC KAZMUNAIGAS EXPLORATION PROD 12.9000 LKOD PJSC LUKOIL 67.2000 LSRG LSR GROUP 2.9000 MAIL MAIL.RU GROUP LIMITED 32.0000 MFON MEGAFON 9.2000 MGNT PJSC MAGNIT 26.4000 MHPC MHP SA 12.8000 MDMG MD MEDICAL GROUP INVESTMENTS PLC 10.5000 MMK OJSC MAGNITOGORSK IRON AND STEEL WORKS 10.3000 MNOD MMC NORILSK NICKEL 20.2300 NCSP PJSC NOVOROSSIYSK COMM. SEA PORT 12.9000 NLMK NOVOLIPETSK STEEL 27.4000 NVTK OAO NOVATEK 128.1000 OGZD GAZPROM 5.2300 PLZL POLYUS PJSC 38.7000 RIGD RELIANCE INDUSTRIES 28.7000 RKMD ROSTELEKOM 6.9800 ROSN ROSNEFT OJSC 5.7920 SBER SBERBANK 18.6900 SGGD SURGUTNEFTEGAZ 5.2450 SMSN SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO 1148.0000 SSA SISTEMA JSFC 4.4200 SVST PAO SEVERSTAL 16.8200 TCS TCS GROUP HOLDING 19.3000 TMKS OAO TMK 5.4400 TRCN PJSC TRANSCONTAINER 8.0100 VTBR JSC VTB BANK 1.9370 Underlying code Underlying Name Expiration Price D7LKOD YEAR 17 DIVIDEND LUKOIL FUTURE 3.2643 YEAR 17 DIVIDEND MMC NORILSK NICKEL D7MNOD 1.8622 FUTURE D7OGZD YEAR 17 DIVIDEND GAZPROM FUTURE 0.2679 D7ROSN YEAR 17 DIVIDEND ROSNEFT FUTURE 0.1672 D7SBER YEAR 17 DIVIDEND SBERBANK FUTURE 0.3980 D7SGGD YEAR 17 DIVIDEND SURGUTNEFTEGAZ FUTURE 0.1000 D7VTBR YEAR 17 DIVIDEND VTB BANK FUTURE 0.0414 Members are asked to note that reports showing exercise/assignments should be available by approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Translation JSC Inter RAO 2014 Annual Report
    1 Information translation JSC Inter RAO 2014 Annual Report Preliminarily approved by the Board of Directors of JSC Inter RAO on April 07, 2015 (Minutes No. 138 of the meeting of the Board of Directors dated April 09, 2015). Management Board Boris Kovalchuk Chairman Chief Accountant Alla Vaynilavichute 2 Table of content 1 Report overview ........................................................................................................................ 4 2 General information on Inter RAO Group .................................................................................. 8 2.1 About Inter RAO Group ..................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Group's key performance indicators ................................................................................. 14 2.3 Inter RAO Group on the energy market ........................................................................... 15 2.4 Associations and partnerships ......................................................................................... 15 3 Statement for JSC Inter RAO shareholders and other stakeholders ........................................ 18 4 Development strategy of Inter RAO Group and its implementation ......................................... 21 4.1 Strategy of the Company ................................................................................................. 21 4.2 Business model ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Specialised Asset Management
    specialised research and investment group Russian Power: The Greatest Sector Reform on Earth www.sprin-g.com November 2010 specialised research and investment group Specialised Research and Investment Group (SPRING) Manage Investments in Russian Utilities: - HH Generation - #1 among EM funds (12 Months Return)* #2 among EM funds (Monthly return)** David Herne - Portfolio Manager Previous positions: Member, Board of Directors - Unified Energy Systems, Federal Grid Company, RusHydro, TGK-1, TGK-2, TGK-4, OGK-3, OGK-5, System Operator, Aeroflot, etc. (2000-2008) Chairman, Committee for Strategy and Reform - Unified Energy Systems (2001-2008) Boston Consulting Group, Credit Suisse First Boston, Brunswick. * Top 10 (by 12 Months Return) Emerging Markets (E. Europe/CIS) funds in the world by BarclayHedge as of 30 September 2010 ** Top 10 (by Monthly Return) Emerging Markets (E. Europe/CIS) funds in the world by BarclayHedge as of 31 August 2010 2 specialised research and investment group Russian power sector reform: Privatization Pre-Reform Post-Reform Government Government 52% 1 RusHydro 1 FSK RAO ES RAO UES 58% 79% hydro generation HV distribution 53% Far East Holding control control Independent energos 53% 1 MRSK Holding 14 TGKs 0% (Bashkir, Novosibirsk, ~72 energos 0% generation (CHP) generation Irkutsk, Tat) 35 federal plants transmission thermal 11 MRSK distribution 51% hydro LV distribution 0% ~72 SupplyCos supply 6 OGKs other 0% generation 45% InterRAO 0% ~100 RepairCos Source: UES, Companies Data, SPRING research 3 specialised research
    [Show full text]
  • FY2020 Financial Results
    Norilsk Nickel 2020 Financial Results Presentation February 2021 Disclaimer The information contained herein has been prepared using information available to PJSC MMC Norilsk Nickel (“Norilsk Nickel” or “Nornickel” or “NN”) at the time of preparation of the presentation. External or other factors may have impacted on the business of Norilsk Nickel and the content of this presentation, since its preparation. In addition all relevant information about Norilsk Nickel may not be included in this presentation. No representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information. Any forward looking information herein has been prepared on the basis of a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect. Forward looking statements, by the nature, involve risk and uncertainty and Norilsk Nickel cautions that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Reference should be made to the most recent Annual Report for a description of major risk factors. There may be other factors, both known and unknown to Norilsk Nickel, which may have an impact on its performance. This presentation should not be relied upon as a recommendation or forecast by Norilsk Nickel. Norilsk Nickel does not undertake an obligation to release any revision to the statements contained in this presentation. The information contained in this presentation shall not be deemed to be any form of commitment on the part of Norilsk Nickel in relation to any matters contained, or referred to, in this presentation. Norilsk Nickel expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the contents of this presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Without Borders
    2011 GENERATING ASSETS 27 THERMAL POWER PLANTS, 2 HYDROPOWER PLANTS AND 1 WIND FARM IN THE MANAGEMENT INSTALLED CAPACITY 28.2 GW (+45.8%) SHARE IN THE TOTAL INSTALLED CAPACITY OF RUSSIA 10.2% GENERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER 116.9BN KW*H (+37.3%) BOILER HEAT THERMAL POWER 19.8M GCAL (+0.5%) POWER SUPPLY ASSETS ENERGY POWER SUPPLY ASSETS ENERGY SALES VOLUME AT THE RETAIL MARKET 143.1BN KW*H (SHARE AT THE RF MARKET 14.02%) POWER GRID ASSETS TOTAL LENGTH OF POWER TRANSMISSION LINES ABROAD 34265 KM (+1.1%) ELECTRICITY EXPORT AND IMPORT EXPORT VOLUME 22.7BN KW*H (+21.9%) (INCLUDING AZERBAIJAN +148.1% BELARUS +10774.7% GEORGIA +111.2% KAZAKHSTAN +60.5% CHINA +26.0% LITHUANIA +8.6% MONGOLIA +23.2% SOUTH OSSETIA +11.7% IMPORT VOLUME +17.2% (INCLUDING AZERBAIJAN +93.2% KAZAKHSTAN +58.0%) FINANCIAL INDICATORS REVENUE 536.2BN RUB (+15.5%) EBITDA 41.7BN RUB (+24.1%) NET PROFIT 41.5BN RUB (+123.1%) CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 32.5BN RUB (+97.0%) TOTAL ASSETS 531.9BN RUB (+113.5%) TOTAL EQUITY 390.7BN RUB (+180.9%) NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2011 47014 PERSONS ENERGY WITHOUT BORDERS ANNUAL REPORT 2011 JSC “INTER RAO UES” Contents ENERGY WITHOUT BORDERS.........................................................................................................................................................1 ADDRESS BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD OF JSC “INTER RAO UES”..............................................................................................................8 1. General Information about the Company and its Place in the Industry...........................................................10 1.1. Brief History of the Company......................................................................................................................... 10 1.2. Business Model of the Group..........................................................................................................................12 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report ‘06 Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT ‘06 CONTENTS MESSAGE TO SHAREHOLDERS ————————————————————————————— 4 MISSION AND STRATEGY ———————————————————————————————— 7 COMPANY OVERVIEW ————————————————————————————————— 13 ² GENERAL INFORMATION 13 ² GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION 14 ² CALENDAR OF KEY 2006 EVENTS 15 ² REORGANIZATION 16 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE —————————————————————————————— 21 ² PRINCIPLES AND DOCUMENTS 21 ² MANAGEMENT BODIES OF THE COMPANY 22 ² CONTROL BODIES 39 ² AUDITOR 40 ² ASSOCIATED AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES 40 ² INTERESTED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 41 SECURITIES AND EQUITY ——————————————————————————————— 43 ² CHARTER CAPITAL STRUCTURE 43 ² STOCK MARKET 44 ² DIVIDEND HISTORY 48 ² REGISTRAR 49 OPERATING ACTIVITIES. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ——————————————— 51 ² GENERATING FACILITIES 51 ² FUEL SUPPLY 52 ² ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION 56 ² HEAT PRODUCTION 59 ² BASIC PRODUCTION ASSETS REPAIR 59 ² INCIDENT AND INJURY RATES. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY 60 ² ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY 61 ELECTRICITY AND HEAT MARKETS ——————————————————————————— 65 ² COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT. OVERVIEW OF KEY MARKETS 65 ² ELECTRICITY AND HEAT SALES 67 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW ————————————————————————————————— 73 ² FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 73 ² REVENUES AND EXPENSES BREAKDOWN 81 INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES ———————————————————————————————— 83 ² INVESTMENT STRATEGY 83 ² INVESTMENT PROGRAM 84 ² INVESTMENT PROGRAM FINANCING SOURCES 86 ² DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS 87 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT —————————————————————— 89 PERSONNEL AND SOCIAL POLICY. SOCIAL PARTNERSHIP ———————————————— 91 INFORMATION FOR INVESTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS ——————————————————
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Moscow Exchange Index Review
    Notes on Moscow Exchange index review Moscow Exchange approves the updated list of index components and free float ratios effective from 16 March 2018. X5 Retail Group N.V. (DRs) will be added to Moscow Exchange indices with the expected weight of 1.13 per cent. As these securities were offered initially, they were added without being in the waiting list under consideration. Thus, from 16 March the indices will comprise 46 (component stocks. The MOEX Russia and RTS Index moved to a floating number of component stocks in December 2017. En+ Group plc (DRs) will be in the waiting list to be added to Moscow Exchange indices, as their liquidity rose notably over recent three months. NCSP Group (ords) with low liquidity, ROSSETI (ords) and RosAgro PLC with their weights now below the minimum permissible level (0.2 per cent) will be under consideration to be excluded from the MOEX Russia Index and RTS Index. The Blue Chip Index constituents remain unaltered. X5 Retail Group (DRs), GAZ (ords), Obuvrus LLC (ords) and TNS energo (ords) will be added to the Broad Market Index, while Common of DIXY Group and Uralkali will be removed due to delisting expected. TransContainer (ords), as its free float sank below the minimum threshold of 5 per cent, and Southern Urals Nickel Plant (ords), as its liquidity ratio declined, will be also excluded. LSR Group (ords) will be incuded into SMID Index, while SOLLERS and DIXY Group (ords) will be excluded due to low liquidity ratio. X5 Retail Group (DRs) and Obuvrus LLC (ords) will be added to the Consumer & Retail Index, while DIXY Group (ords) will be removed from the Index.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Severstal Press Release ENG
    PRESS RELEASE Paris, June 3, 2021 Air Liquide and Severstal extend their partnership with a new long-term contract in major oxygen site in continental Europe Air Liquide and PAO Severstal, one of the leading steel producers, have signed a new long-term contract for the supply of oxygen to the Severstal CherMK site in Russia. Air Liquide will invest around 60 million euros in the construction of a state-of-the-art Air Separation Unit (ASU) on the site, one of the largest oxygen sites in continental Europe, where it already owns three other ASUs. Thanks to enhanced energy efficiency, this new unit will improve the overall environmental footprint. Air Liquide will design and build a new state-of-the-art ASU on the Severstal CherMK site in Cherepovets, one of the most competitive steel making sites worldwide. The new unit will produce 1,000 tons of oxygen per day. This is the fourth ASU installed by Air Liquide in Cherepovets. Planned to be started up by the end of 2023, the unit will be owned and operated by Air Liquide Severstal, a joint venture established in 2005 between Air Liquide (75%) and Severstal (25%). It will bring the total production capacity on this site, one of the largest sites for Oxygen production in continental Europe, at above 8,000 tonnes of oxygen per day. This new ASU is characterized by improved energy efficiency. In the framework of the agreement the two companies have also committed to further reduce the CO2 emissions arising from the oxygen production, in line with Air Liquide’s commitments to address the urgency of climate change and to act for a sustainable future.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia's Largest Public Companies
    An Overview Of Boards Of Directors At Russia’s Largest Public Companies Andrei Rakitin Milena Barsukova Arina Mazunova Translated from Russian August 2020 Key Results According to information disclosed by 109 of Russia’s largest public companies: “Classic” board compositions of 11, nine, and seven seats prevail The total number of persons on Boards of the companies under study is not as low as it might seem: 89% of all Directors were elected to only one such Board Female Directors account for 12% and are more often elected to the audit, nomination, and remuneration committees than to the strategy committee Among Directors, there are more “humanitarians” than “techies,” while the share of “techies” among chairs is greater than across the whole sample The average age for Directors is 53, 56 for Chairmen, and 58 for Independent Directors Generation X is the most visible on Boards, and Generation Y Directors will likely quickly increase their presence if the impetuous development of digital technologies continues The share of Independent Directors barely reaches 30%, and there is an obvious lack of independence on key committees such as audit Senior Independent Directors were elected at 17% of the companies, while 89% of Chairs are not independent The average total remuneration paid to the Board of Directors is RUR 69 million, with the difference between the maximum and minimum being 18 times Twenty-four percent of the companies disclosed information on individual payments made to their Directors. According to this, the average total remuneration is approximately RUR 9 million per annum for a Director, RUR 17 million for a Chair, and RUR 11 million for an Independent Director The comparison of 2020 findings with results of a similar study published in 2012 paints an interesting dynamic picture.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Withholding Tax Refund
    Russian withholding tax refund Tax & Legal If you or your clients invested in Russian securities and are entitled to a substantial dividend or interest income, there is a chance that you overpaid your taxes and may qualify for a tax refund © 2018 Deloitte Consulting LLC Background Investors may apply a According to the The Russian The tax refund reduced tax rate for Russian tax withholding tax rate is practice in Russia is their interest and/or authorities, they are set at 15% on not well-developed: dividend income, ready to reimburse dividends and 20 the tax legislation depending on the overpaid taxes, if a percent on interest. does not provide for a conditions set by the full package of Effective from 1 specific list of Russian Tax Code or documents confirming January 2014, the documents to be applicable Double Tax the income payment duties of the tax collected and Treaties. Calculations chain and the agent for WHT requirements to be of a standard Russian investor’s rights to purposes were met. For these rate or the standard the income is transferred to the reasons, the process reduced Double Tax submitted. local Russian can be lengthy and Treaty rate, as well as custodian or, in a sometimes fruitless. submission of claims limited number of However, the trend is on tax can be cases, to the reassuring: the refunded, should be fiduciary, broker or number of successful made by investors issuer. refund claims and themselves within positive court three calendar years, decisions is growing. following the year in which it was withheld.
    [Show full text]