DOCSLIB.ORG

On Current New York Architecture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On Current New York Architecture OCULUS on current new york architecture Compensations and Awards The New York Chapter of the American Institute of Architects Volume 43, Number 9, June 1982 page2 Oculus OCULUS President's Report Compensation Survey Volume 43, Number 9, June 1982 by Joseph Wasserman Oculus A Change of Emphasis The NYC/AIA has completed a survey Editor: C. Ray Smith This issue of OCULUS is devoted to of Architects compensation. The last Managing Editor: Marian Page two subjects-looking at beautiful such survey was conducted ten years Art Director: Abigail Sturges buildings all designed by local boys, Typesetting: Susan Schechter ago. and architects' business - their fees, The New York Chapter of their <:ontracts, their compensation. I We are gratified with the the American Institute of Architects am sure we all prefer to focus on the participation: 109 out of 310 firms The Urban Center, 457 Madison A venue, awards. The business end of returned the questionnaire, a rather New York, New York 10022 architecture is not romantic, not the high percentage. In fact, the survey 212-838-9670 stuff to stir men's souls. One even accounts for nearly all the feels embarrassed having to concern architectural personnel covered by George S. Lewis, Executive Director oneself with these uncomfortable member firms' sustaining dues-2972 Executive Committee 1981-82: details of practice. After all, none of us owners and employees in all, of which Joseph Wasserman, President entered this profession with business 2495 are architecturally trained. Arthur I. Rosenblatt, First Vice President concerns uppermost in our minds. Tician Papachristou, Vice President The results are predictable. They Robert Siegel, Vice President But as we have all learned, many of us indicate that architectural Terrance Williams, Secretary painfully, we are engaged in a professionals are woefully Alan Schwartzman, Treasurer business/profession, in which the compensated at virtually all levels: Frank Eliseo remuneration is unacceptably low, and William Ellis the business is highly subject to the Starting salaries vary from $10,500 Theodore Liebman Nancy A. Miao adjustments of the economic cycle. In per year in firms of 3-5 persons to Stuart Pertz accountant's terms, we are a FITLOT $14,472 per yefir in offices of 41-100 Mildred F. Schmertz business-First in Trouble, Last out persons. of Trouble. NYC/AIA Staff Only 20% of the architecturally Cathanne Piesla Some of our greatest troubles come trained personnel earn over $35,000 Carol Jones from our fellow professionals, who per year, only 7% over $50,000, and Jeannette Manzo simply underprice the services we less than 2%, perhaps considerably Eileen McGrath render often performing front end less, earn more than $100,000 per © 1982 The New York Chapter of the services at little or no cost. year. American Institute of Architects. I trust that we will begin to raise our The 178 principals surveyed (7% of consciousness on many professional the total architectural personnel) earn Chapter HQ Fund Drive issues; that we, ourselves, will develop total average compensations of a greater respect for the services we $66,000 per year; the median render; and that we will begin to compensation is only $60,000. As of Friday, May 21-press time for charge for them accordingly, realizing this issue of OCUL US - we are that it is impossible to perform a The survey is quite fascinating: there pleased to report that we have responsible professional service are probably endless informative secured pledges from 20 firms and without adequate compensation. statistics that can be derived from the individuals totaling $130,000. mass of data we have gathered. But If we render a top professional they will say the same thing; it's past The results, to date, are very service, our clients will certainly time to put our practices and our lives encouraging; about 60% of the funds recognize the difference; many on a more sound financial basis. needed are now pledged. The average clients-among them developer pledge is approximately $6500. But clients notorious for paying low fees - Brunner Grant to most of these pledges have come in are demanding top quality service, John Gallery from the larger firms. The cream has imaginatively and reliably delivered. been taken. It's time now for all of us to dig into our pockets and make as It is my hope that the New York 1982 Brunner Grant of $10,000 has generous a contribution as possible. Chapter/AJA will p"rovide information been awarded to John Gallery of We need the pledges now. We can and leadership over the coming years Philadelphia for research in writing a wait a few months for the actual gift. in the many areas of changing and monograph on the life and work of Please call or write the Chapter and developing practice. Clarence Stein. Peter Kastl, chairman tell us what you are able to pledge. of the Brunner jury, reports that Ours is a wonderful town to live in. there were 23 submissions covering a Let's make it a great and rewarding wide range of projects. place to practice architecture. Oculus page3 Compensation Committee Report Richard Hayden, Chairman Carmi Bee Sam Haffey Eason Leonard Barry LePatner Frank Munzer Jeff Sydness Joseph Wasserman The Compensation Committee is attitude toward his job and this is consciousness to the point where the pleased to submit this initial report on often reflected in low productivity. elementary facts simply require that the work of the Committee. The Since we don't "invest" much in our we pledge our fullest energies to conclusions of the Committee, reached new employees, we tend not to value making this recommendation a reality. after extensive analysis and their contributions. We don't attach or discussion, are serious, and, in some require much loyalty from those A substantial increase in salary will ways, revolutionary. Our initial employees and we certainly do not almost certainly stimulate greater reactions from the Compensation offer much job security. interest among junior employees. Survey are simple: Firms will hire and financially reward There is a high turnover among only those who contribute to 1. Professional compensation in our younger employees, but, in fact, productivity and profitability. Firms field is woefully inadequate, turnover is damagingly high at all will have a much greater incentive to particularly at the starting levels, but levels of practice. Surveys in other make use of time and labor-saving in fact at all positions-except for a professions indicate that losing an practices. Architectural schools will very small group of principals who employee whose time is billable can be obliged to train young professionals are, perhaps, fairly compensated. cost 2-3 times the employee's annual with merchantable skills. There will salary in terms of lost time and be a weeding out process, long 2. The general lack of profitability, retraining costs. overdue, but at least those that firms and principals alike, appears remain in practice and find jobs, will effectively to preclude any realistic What does the Committee recommend? be assured of a future with reasonable adjustment of employee compensation We recommend primarily that a economic growth potential. without throwing virtually every financial program be implemented prudently managed firm into financial which will enable starting salaries for By stabilizing firm personnel, we will, chaos. qualified architectural school more and more, be selling the graduates to be increased by collective experience and ability of our Annual salaries for starting level approximately 20% each year for the firms with much more commitment to professionals range from $10,500 per next three years from the present quality of product and service. At year in an office of 3-5 persons (23 average starting wage in larger firms present, many firms are so busy firms reporting), to $14,472 in offices of $15,000 per year to approximately surviving that mastering the of 41-100 persons (6 firms reporting). $25,590 by January l, 1985. This architectural process takes a adjustment should be exclusive of any subsidiary role to meeting the payroll. How is a young professional able to further adjustments for inflation. The keep body and soul together at that effect of this increase will bring What will it cost? level of compensation? How can we architects' starting wages to The "cost" of restructuring our levels expect a person to work in an approximately the same level as the of compensation is high, though not so organized and devoted fashion toward neophyte mechanical and structural nearly high as we might expect. A becoming a seasoned professional engineers who are working on our 60% increase in base wages over a when that work is undertaken under projects. three-year period of a starting such an extraordinary economic professional and suitable adjustments disadvantage? Is it any wonder that Given the limited profitability of our at all levels (see accompanying table many of the more together individuals firms, how could we possibly for a hypothetical scenario for a quickly despair of ever being able to contemplate a 60% increase in initial typical 10-man firm), would result in earn a respectable wage and therefore professional salaries over a three year an overall increase in salaries of 35%, drift off into other associated areas period? Our Committee, made up of including an increase in partner draw where the rewards are more some of the best and toughest of15%. reasonable? It is practically professionals in New York­ impossible to evaluate the cost of this representing large, medium size, and Overhead attributed to payroll taxes personnel loss, but we sense that small offices- has met often and and vacations would go up 5% for a many of the most talented young grappled with this problem, and has total increase of 40%.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • District Lines Spring 2008
    DISTRICT LINES news and views of the historic districts council spring 2008 vol. XXI no. 3 HDC Annual Conference Eyes Preservation’s Role In The Future of New York City In Ma r c h 2008, the Historic Districts neighborhoods throughout the five bor- and infrastructure concerns. Council’s 14th Annual Preservation oughs were able to admire the recently A group of respondents to the key- Conference, Preservation 2030, took a restored rotunda, built on the land where note zeroed in on PlaNYC’s lack of atten- tion to community preservation. Partici- pants included Peg Breen, president of The New York Landmarks Conservancy; Jonathan Peters, a transportation expert from the College of Staten Island; and Anthony C. Wood, author of “Preserving New York: Winning the Right to Protect a City’s Landmarks.” “New Yorkers need more than just water to drink and beds to sleep in,” said Mr. Wood. “New York is a city of neigh- HDC Director Leo Blackman, left, moderates “Surviving the borhoods, and long-term planning for the Building Boom: Urban Neighborhoods of the Future,” featuring city has to take that into account.” Michael Rebic, Andrew Berman and Brad Lander. “Surviving the Building Boom: Urban Neighborhoods of the Future,” brought HISTORIC DISTRICTS COUNCIL together experts to discuss tools for pre- critical look at preservation’s role in shap- George Washington took his oath of serving the city’s historic urban neigh- ing New York’s urban environment for office as the first president of the United borhoods while providing new housing future generations. Rather than lament- States.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Saving Carnegie Hall: A Case Study of Historic Preservation in Postwar New York City Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3x19f20h Author Schmitz, Sandra Elizabeth Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Saving Carnegie Hall: A Case Study of Historic Preservation in Postwar New York A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History by Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz June 2015 Thesis Committee: Dr. Patricia Morton, Chairperson Dr. Jason Weems Dr. Catherine Gudis Copyright by Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz 2015 The Thesis of Sandra Elizabeth Schmitz is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr. Patricia Morton, for helping me to arrive at this topic and for providing encouragement and support along the way. I’m incredibly grateful for the time she took to share her knowledgeable insight and provide thorough feedback. Committee members Dr. Jason Weems and Dr. Catherine Gudis also brought valuable depth to my project through their knowledge of American architecture, urbanism, and preservation. The department of Art History at the University of California, Riverside (UCR) made this project possible by providing me with a travel grant to conduct research in New York City. Carnegie Hall’s archivists graciously guided my research at the beginning of this project and provided more information than I could fit in this thesis. I could not have accomplished this project without the support of Stacie, Hannah, Leah, and all the friends who helped me stay grounded through the last two years of writing, editing, and talking about architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Field with Extre
    Adventuresin the field inwith Preservationextreme conservator kent diebolt he last pitch of the climb presents a number of technical problems. the holds are fragile and Tfar apart; the incline, sheer vertical. the summit is well within reach, only a few careful moves away. this is no ordinary big-wall ascent, however. the peak in question is none other than trinity towers, just north of trinity church, a mere three blocks from ground Zero. the neo-gothic edifice is one of lower manhattan’s architectural gems and the current subject of a careful conservation and structural analysis. the collapse of the world trade center on september 11 rocked every building in the neighborhood to its very foundations and blanketed the area photos: jon reis/www.jonreis.com with pulveriZed gypsum and debris. Adventuresin the field inwith Preservationextreme conservator kent diebolt cleveland towers at princeton university st. thomas church, new york city new jersey state house rotunda, trenton chrysler building, new york city Undertaking the survey is a team led by kent diebolt, founder of vertical access, a decade-old private firm specializing in building assess- ments in extreme locations. “a british mountaineering friend from graduate school suggested i look to ropes as an ideal medium for getting around on buildings,” diebolt told ICON. “ropes are relatively inexpensive, nondestructive, and afford a level of control and maneuverability simply not available using far more below: trinity towers, new york city costly scaffolding.” Using a range of techniques derived from rock climbing, below left: st thomas church, new york city search-and-rescue, and caving, vertical access has devised ingenious meth- ods by which to move about on and within steeples, domes, and towers.
    [Show full text]
  • STEINWAY HALL, 109-113 West 57T1i Street (Aka 106-116 West 58L" Street), Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 13, 2001, Designation List 331 LP-2100 STEINWAY HALL, 109-113 West 57t1i Street (aka 106-116 West 58l" Street), Manhattan. Built 1924-25; [Whitney] Warren & [Charles D.] Wetmore, architects; Thompson-Starrett Co., builders. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1010, Lot 25. October 16, 2001 , the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of Steinway Hall and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 3). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions oflaw. Eight people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the property's owners, Community Board 5, Municipal Art Society, American Institute of Architects' Historic Buildings Committee, and Historic Districts Council. In addition, the Commission received two letters in support of designation, including one from the New York Landmarks Conservancy. Summary The sixteen-story Steinway Hall was constructed in 1924-25 to the design of architects Warren & Wetmore for Steinway & Sons, a piano manufacturing firm that has been a dominant force in its industry since the 1860s. Founded in 1853 in New York by Heinrich E. Steinweg, Sr., the firm grew to worldwide renown and prestige through technical innovations, efficient production, business acumen, and shrewd promotion using artists' endorsements. From 1864 to 1925, Steinway's offices/showroom, and famous Steinway Hall (1866), were located near Union Square. After Carnegie Hall opened in 1891, West 57t1i Street gradually became one of the nation's leading cultural and classical music centers and the piano companies relocated uptown. It was not until 1923, however, that Steinway acquired a 57th Street site.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Valley a Community Vision for the Future
    MANHATTAN VALLEY A COMMUNITY VISION FOR THE FUTURE Pratt Institute City & Regional Planning 1 Programs in Sustainable Planning & Development Graduate Department of City & Regional Planning Pratt Institute Higgins Hall North Room 206 Brooklyn NY 11205 2 MANHATTAN VALLEY A COMMUNITY VISION FOR THE FUTURE Pratt Institute School of Architecture Programs in Sustainable Planning & Development Graduate Program in City and Regional Planning PLAN 656: Fundamentals of Planning Spring 2010 CONTRIBUTORS Amy Bzdak Jennifer Gardner Sara Margolis Susan Stawicki Lauren Standke Jonathan Sussman Kristen Wilke Ronald Woudstra Instructors Dr. Ayse Yonder, Pratt Institute Sideya Sherman, Senior Planner, Municipal Art Society CONTENTS The Study 07 Introduction 09 History 12 Community Visioning 15 Recommendations Seniors 22 Youth 38 Open Space 46 Conclusion 62 Appendices A: Community Character i B: Community Visioning Data v C: Seniors xv D: Open Space xxi E: Contact Information xxv 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to express our thanks to those who have helped us throughout the course of this project. This report would not have been possible without the assistance and support of the following groups and people: Assemblyman Daniel O’Donnell and Staff Peter Arndtsen of the Columbus/Amsterdam Business Improvement District The Municipal Art Society Community Board 7, Youth Education and Library Committee Our Hosts: Red Oak Apartments International Youth Hostel Park West Neighborhood History Group Church of the Ascension Our Sources: Kathleen Benjamin, Dottie Janotjka,
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel D. Gruber 123 Clarke Street Syracuse, New York 13210 Tel (+1 315) 762-2850 / Email: [email protected]
    Samuel D. Gruber 123 Clarke Street Syracuse, New York 13210 Tel (+1 315) 762-2850 / email: [email protected] EDUCATION Ph.D. 1998 Columbia University, NY, NY, Dept. of Art History and Archeology M.Phil. 1993 Columbia University, NY, NY, Dept. of Art History and Archeology M.A. 1984 Columbia University, NY, NY, Dept. of Art History and Archeology 1981 Cornell University Summer Session, Rome, Italy Surveying and Measured Drawing Program B.A. 1977 Princeton University, Princeton, NJ (Honors in Medieval Studies, 1977) ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2017 Visting Associate Professor, Jewish Studies, Cornell University 2001– present Part-time faculty in Jewish Studies/History of Art, Syracuse University 2014 Part-time faculty, Honors Program, Lemoyne College 2013 Part-time instructor, College of Visual and Performing Arts Syracuse University (summer session) 2013 Part-time instructor, Syracuse, University Honors Program, 2009 Lecturer in Art History, Cazenovia College 2003 Lecturer in Art and Art History, Colgate University 2002 Humanistic Studies Center, Syracuse University 2001 Humanistic Studies Center, Syracuse University 1996-1997 Rothman Visiting Lecturer in Judaic Studies, 1996 Adjunct Professor of Fine Arts, Syracuse University 1995 Adjunct Professor of Architecture, Cornell University 1994 Adjunct Professor in Fine Arts, Syracuse University 1994 Guest Lecturer, Jewish Studies Program, SUNY Binghamton 1987-1989 Preceptor, Art Humanities Course, Columbia University 1987 Lecturer, Gruppo Archeologico Romano, Rome 1984-1986 Part-time faculty,
    [Show full text]
  • District Lines Spring 2009
    news and viewsDISTRICT of the Historic Districts Council LINESSpring 2009 vol. xxiii no. 1 “ENDANG E R E D ” SOUTH STR ee T SE APORT MAK es SE V E N TO SAV E LI S T RECENTLY , THE SOUTH ST R EET SEAPO R T the 1939 New Market Building, which toric district in 1977 and its subsequent Historic District made the annual “Sev- lies just outside the locally designated expansion in 1989, alterations and con- en to Save” Endangered Properties List historic district, to make room for two struction in the neighborhood, under of the Preservation League of New York high-rise towers. The new development the watchful eye of the Landmarks Preservation Commission, have been appropriate for the most part, some even enhancing the character of the dis- trict. Over the last few years, though, a number of projects proposed by the city to create new amenities in the increas- ingly residential and affluent neighbor- hood have been less sympathetic. For example, a roller-coaster-look- ing playground with ramps almost six feet high and additional six-foot-tall fences was approved for Burling Slip. In Peck Slip, a park with trees and sculp- tural rib-like elements evoking a ship will fill the open space. Another park, with tidal-marsh plantings, arrangement of bluestone in a wave pattern, and a water feature, will surround the Ti- HDC tanic Memorial located at the main en- 159-171 John Street, South Street Seaport Historic District trance to the district on Fulton Street. State, the statewide historic-preserva- would wall off the Seaport from the wa- Most recently, a proposal to reconstruct tion advocacy organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in People and Places @Regionalplan #Rpaassembly RPA Board of Directors
    April 19, 2019 Investing in People and Places @RegionalPlan #RPAassembly RPA Board of Directors Chairman Rohit T. Aggarwala* Trent Lethco* Scott Rechler* David Armour Christopher Levendos Mark Marcucci President & CEO Charles Avolio Andrew Mathias Thomas K. Wright* Joseph Barile Stephen R. Beckwith Jan Nicholson Robert Billingsley* Richard L. Oram Co-Chair, Advancement Committee Eugénie Birch Seth Pinsky* Marcia Bateson* Robert Blumenthal Clint Plummer Jason Post Co-Chair, Connecticut Committee Mark Blumkin Thomas Prendergast Michael J. Cacace Anthony Borelli Jo Ivey Boufford David Quart Co-Chair, Connecticut Committee Tonio Burgos Richard Ravitch Michael J. Critelli Vishaan Chakrabarti Gregg Rechler Michael J. Regan Vice Chair Kevin G. Chavers James Rubin Douglas Durst Jun Choi* Frank Cohen Elliot G. Sander Co-Chair, New Jersey Committee Anthony R. Coscia John Santora Hon. James J. Florio Jose Luis Cruz Samuel I. Schwartz Peggy Shepard Co-Chair, Nominating & Governance Committee Peter D’Arcy Tokumbo Shobowale Timur Galen* Mike DeMarco Steve Denning H. Claude Shostal Counsel Lisa Diaz Ryan Simonetti David Huntington* Susannah Drake Jennifer Skyler Monica Slater Stokes Co-Chair, New Jersey Committee Blair Duncan Susan L. Solomon Paul Josephson* Eva Durst Winston Fisher Robert K. Steel* Co-Chair, Audit & Finance Committee Sarah Fitts Robert Stromsted Matthew S. Kissner* James E. Fitzgerald Michael Sweeney Reuben Teague Co-Chair, Audit & Finance Committee Maxine Griffith Travis Terry Hope Knight* Christopher Hahn Rachel Haot Richard T. Thigpen Co-Chair, Advancement Committee Richard J. Haray Darryl Towns Denise Richardson Suzanne Heidelberger Jane Veron Philippe Visser Co-Chair, Communications Committee Peter W. Herman Kevin Willens Marc Ricks Dylan Hixon Brian Hughes Kate Wittels Co-Chair, Communications Committee Kerry Hughes Eric Yarbro Janette Sadik-Khan Sabrina Kanner Robert D.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening of Mies’S Iconic Barcelona Pavilion
    95 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016 tel 646 424 9594 WORLD MONUMENTS FUND fax 646 424 9593 www.wmf.org Media Inquiries Holly Evarts, Director of Public Relations July 2005 646-424-9594, [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________ WORLD MONUMENTS FUND SECURES FUTURE FOR ENDANGERED 20th-CENTURY LANDMARK, EDWARD DURELL STONE’S A. CONGER GOODYEAR HOUSE WMF ARRANGES SALE OF ICONIC MODERN HOUSE TO NOTED DESIGNER OF CONTEMPORARY FURNITURE For Immediate Release—New York, New York, July 26, 2005 . .Bonnie Burnham, president of the World Monuments Fund (WMF), announced today that the landmark A. Conger Goodyear House, designed by Edward Durell Stone, has been sold with a preservation easement that will protect its architectural integrity in perpetuity. Located in Old Westbury (Long Island), New York, and designed in 1938-39 for A. Conger Goodyear, first president of The Museum of Modern Art, the House is considered to be one of Stone’s most important residential buildings and is one of the most important Modernist houses of its era in the Northeastern United States. In 2001, soon after the House was placed on the World Monuments Watch list of 100 Most Endangered Sites, WMF engineered a dramatic rescue of the building from imminent demolition. The Goodyear House was then was purchased and held temporarily under a partnership created by WMF with the Society for the Preservation of Long Island Antiquities (SPLIA) with funding from the Barnett and Analee Newman Foundation. It is now also on the New York State and National Register of Historic Places. The Goodyear House has been purchased by Troy Halterman, a noted designer and retailer of contemporary furniture in New York City, who plans to restore the iconic structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Researching Old Buildings in New York City
    1 BROOKLYN COLLECTION HOUSE AND BUILDING RESEARCH GUIDE The following facilities provide information for researchers of old buildings in Brooklyn. Brooklyn Collection Address: 10 Grand Army Plaza Phone: 718-230-2762 Website: bklynlibrary.org/brooklyncollection Brooklyn, NY 11238 The Brooklyn Public Library’s local history division, the Brooklyn Collection, holds numerous materials that will benefit the buildings researcher. Included in the collection are over 500 historic and contemporary maps and atlases, many of which show material content of buildings, house and block numbers, street status and usability, locations of sewers and water mains, locations of subway and rail lines, section and ward division lines, and original farm lines, among other information. The Brooklyn Collection also has Sanborn maps on microfilm ranging from 1886 to 1951 as well as hardcopies of Sanborn maps with corrections made as recently as 2005. Sanborn maps were designed to assist fire insurance agents in determining the degree of hazard associated with a particular property and therefore show the size, shape, and construction of dwellings, commercial buildings, and factories as well as fire walls, locations of windows and doors, sprinkler systems, and types of roofs. The maps also indicate widths and names of streets, property boundaries, building use, and house and block numbers. The maps on microfilm, which are available upon request in the Brooklyn Collection, are in black and white only. We also have online access to the Sanborn maps database available on-site at the library. If you have found the date of construction for your building, and if it falls before 1955, you can search the Brooklyn Daily Eagle online for articles mentioning the address.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Art Society Law Committee
    Zoning Variances And the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals The Municipal Art Society of New York, Inc. March 2004 About the Study This study of the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals was performed by the Municipal Art Society between January and April 2003. Christopher Rizzo, Esq., the Society’s Menapace Fellow, drafted the report. The Society’s Law Committee, chaired by Michael B. Gerrard, Esq. and composed of a wide range of attorneys in the private, public, non-profit and academic sectors, reviewed the data and worked to the craft the conclusions and recommendations in this report. The Planning Center of the Municipal Art Society provided additional review, including the mapping of data. A subcommittee that included staff from the Society and members of its Law Committee was formed to oversee and assist in the preparation of the report. From the Law Committee: From the Municipal Art Society: Vicki Been Eve Baron Antonia Levine Bryson Kent Barwick Christopher Collins Micaela Birmingham Richard Emery Eva Hanhardt Michael B. Gerrard Kimberly Miller Michael S. Gruen Frank Emile Sanchis III Holly M. Leicht Greg Studwell Norman Marcus Vicki Weiner Eileen D. Millet Charles B. Katzenstein Columbia University Law Students: Dorothy M. Miner Ross Sandler Mara Cusker Bruce H. Simon Joshua Plaut E. Gail Suchman Sally Peacock David P. Warner Philip Weinberg The Municipal Art Society is a private, non-profit membership organization whose mission is to promote a more livable city. Since 1893, the Society has worked to enrich the culture, neighborhoods and physical design of New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    2 3 Contents About the Public Design Commission 2 Commissioners 3 Staff 3 Conservation Advisory Group 3 Design Review 4 2019 Year in Review 7 Submissions by Type 8 Architecture and Structures 9 Parks, Open Spaces, and Streetscapes 10 Artworks 11 Private Structures on or over City-owned Land 12 Carry-over Projects 12 Submissions Acted or Commented Upon 13 Review Cycles 13 Submissions and Projects by Lead Agency 14 Submissions and Projects by Borough 15 Public Engagement and Data 16 Resiliency and Green Infrastructure Projects 17 Highlighted Projects by Borough 19 Designing New York: The Public Designers 31 Special Projects and Interagency Initiatives 51 The Archive 52 City Hall Tour Program 53 Annual Awards for Excellence in Design 55 Women-Designed NYC 60 Shared Spaces: Designing People-Friendly Urban Streets 61 Prefabrication in the Public Realm 62 Quality Affordable Housing 63 The City’s Public Art Database 64 Art for New York: The Making of a Public Art Collection 65 Other Collaborations and Professional Development 66 Commissioner Biographies 69 Staff Biographies 72 The Public Design Commission Commissioners Signe Nielsen, President, Landscape Architect Philip E. Aarons, Vice President, Lay Member Laurie Hawkinson, Architect Manuel Miranda, Lay Member Richard Moore, Brooklyn Museum Susan Morgenthau, The New York Public Library Ethel Sheffer, Mayor’s Representative Dr. Merryl H. Tisch, The Metropolitan Museum of Art Shin-pei Tsay, Secretary, Lay Member* Mary Valverde, Sculptor Hank Willis Thomas, Painter *Shin-pei Tsay served as a Lay Member of the Commission through September 2019. Staff Justin Garrett Moore, Executive Director Keri Butler, Deputy Executive Director Grace Han, Director of Capital Projects Rebecca Macklis, Senior Urban Design Manager Jenna E.
    [Show full text]